2009 the Future Role of the Waterberg Coalfield in SA Coal Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2009 the Future Role of the Waterberg Coalfield in SA Coal Industry Report R76/2009 THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE WATERBERG COALFIELD IN SOUTH AFRICA’S COAL INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE: MINERAL ECONOMICS 1 Report R76/2009 THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE WATERBERG COALFIELD IN SOUTH AFRICA’S COAL INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE: MINERAL ECONOMICS Compiled by: Mr Omphemetse Moumakwa [email protected] Issued by and obtainable from The Director: Mineral Economics, Trevenna Campus, 70 Meintjies Street, Arcadia, Pretoria 0001, Private Bag X59, Arcadia 0001 Telephone (012)444-3536, Telefax (012) 444-3134 Website: http://www.dme.gov.za 2 DEPARTMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES Director-General Adv. S Nogxina MINERAL POLICY AND PROMOTION BRANCH Acting Deputy Director-General Mr M Mabuza MINERAL PROMOTION CHIEF DIRECTORATE Chief Director Mr M Mabuza DIRECTORATE MINERAL ECONOMICS Director: Mineral Economics Mr TR Masetlana Deputy Director: Non-Ferrous Minerals and Energy Commodities Mr L Themba THIS IS THE FIRST EDITION PUBLISHED IN 2008 WHEREAS THE GREATEST CARE HAS BEEN TAKEN IN THE COMPILATION OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS PUBLICATION, THE DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS AND ENERGY DOES NOT HOLD ITSELF RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS ISBN: 978-1-920448-10-3 COPYRIGHT RESERVED 3 1. INTRODUCTION South Africa's indigenous energy resource base is dominated by coal. The bulk of South Africa’s coal reserves are situated in the central basin, which consists of the Witbank, Highveld, Ermelo, South Rand and KwaZulu-Natal coalfields. The Witbank area of Mpumalanga contains extensive coal reserves and remains the country’s most productive coalfield. Production from both Witbank and Highveld coalfields represents just over 80 percent of the total run-of-mine (ROM) coal in the country. South Africa has an estimated 30 billion tons of proven coal reserves left, which, at current production rates, would only offer supply for the next 40 to 50 years. An estimated 27 percent of these reserves are located in the Witbank and Highveld coalfields. However, it has become more and more apparent that production from the Witbank-Highveld coalfields will be difficult to sustain in the not-so-distant future. It is believed that by 2020, reserves in many of the large coal mines in these coalfields will be near exhaustion, taking into account the fact that power generation demand is likely to continue rising. The uncertainty of the availability of significant amounts of economically extractable coal reserves for future use means that the generally expected dependence on the Witbank-Highveld coalfields well into the foreseeable future is also uncertain. The Waterberg coalfield in the Limpopo Province has been largely untapped and as such could be regarded as SA’s future, as far as coal is concerned. Hosting 40 percent of SA’s remaining coal resources, the Waterberg coalfield offers a unique opportunity of significantly increasing the country’s coal reserves and doubling its output through new discoveries and developments. This has led to considerable interest and activity in the region, with many new research projects and pilot scale developments. The main aim of this report is therefore to review developments and highlight the new approaches that are now being taken regarding the Waterberg Coalfield, for future coal and energy developments in South Africa. 4 2. GEOLOGY AND EXPLOITATION OF WATERBERG 2.1 Location and General Geology Coal reserves in SA are hosted in sediments of the Permian age which overlie a large area of the country. The coalfields are generally spread over an area of 700 km from north to south and 500 km from east to west. The Waterberg Coalfield, located in the Waterberg basin, is situated in the north-western part of Limpopo province (Figure 1). It trends east-west and is characterised by faults, which strike east-west. Such faults are somewhat responsible for the deep occurrence of coal in some areas, which is the reason why those particular areas have been deemed unmineable. This is in contrast with the majority of South Africa's coal deposits, particularly in the Witbank- Highveld coalfields, which are relatively shallow with thick seams and are thus easier and usually cheaper to mine. FIGURE 1: THE LOCATION OF THE WATERBERG COALFIELD. 5 The Waterberg Coalfield has a 75 billion tonnes resource, making up just over 40 percent of South Africa’s total coal resources. Realistically, however, it will only be economically viable to convert a fraction of this resource into mineable reserves. The coalfield hosts coking coal as well as coal for power generation from both the Vryheid and Grootegeluk Formations of the Karoo Supergroup. The Grootegeluk Formation consists of low grade coal with an ash content of up to 65 percent. Consequently, it has to be beneficiated to get low ash products such as blend coking coal (approximately 10 percent ash content) and middlings (maximum of 35 percent ash content) suitable for power generation. The high P 2O5 content of up to 10 percent in the coal ash of the lower zones in the Grootegeluk Formation makes these zones unsuitable as a source of metallurgical coal. Characteristics of some coal products (air dry basis) from the Grootegeluk Formation are shown in Table 1. TABLE 1: CHARACTERISTICS OF BENEFICIATED COAL PRODUCTS FROM THE GROOTEGELUK FORMATION. Blend Coking Coal* Powerstation Coal (Middlings)* Ash % 10,0 35,0 max Volatile % 38,0 max 22,0 max Moisture % 10,0 max 11,0 max Sulphur % 1,1 1,4 max * Characteristics are based on 12 – 14 percent and 23 – 26 percent yield on ROM for blend coking coal and power station coal, respectively. On the other hand, raw coal from the Vryheid Formation is used as steam coal and for conversion into fuels and chemicals. A small percentage of the Vryheid Formation coal can be processed to higher quality metallurgical products and blend coking coal that can be considered for export. 2.2 Current Production Exxaro’s Grootegeluk opencast coal mine, the largest coal mine in SA, is the only operational mine currently situated in the Waterberg Coalfield (Figure 2). It was commissioned in 1980 to provide coking coal to the steel plants of the then Iscor. The mine also boasts the largest complex of coal beneficiation plants in the world, 6 allowing it to produce a diversity of products. It is also South Africa’s lowest cost coal mine on a free-on-rail basis and is the sole source of coal for Eskom’s Matimba power station, the largest directly dry-cooled power station in the world. FIGURE 2: OPERATIONS AT EXXARO'S GROOTEGELUK COAL MINE. Currently, Exxaro mines several coal zones or coal mining benches in the Grootegeluk mine, which are grouped into two zones. The Upper Ecca zone (Grootegeluk Formation) is characterised by bright coal with interbedded shale, while the Middle Ecca zone (Vryheid Formation) comprises dull coal, sandstone and carbonaceous shale. The coal is generally rich in vitrinite content, thus making it suitable for direct liquefaction. In 2007 the Grootegeluk mine produced 18,5 Mt of coal, of which approximately 14,6 Mt was sold to Eskom and approximately 0,72 Mt was exported. The remaining 3,18 Mt was sold domestically to the metals and other industries. Of all the remaining coal resources in the Waterberg, just over 60 percent would require underground mining, while the remaining portion can be mined in an opencast manner, depending on market trends and logistics. The majority of these resources occur in the Upper Ecca Grootegeluk Formation. 7 3. CURRENT AND FUTURE DVELOPMENTS 3.1 Expansion of Power Generation Internationally, coal is the most widely used primary fuel, accounting for about 36 percent of the total fuel consumption of the world's electricity production. In South Africa, 183 Mt of coal was sold locally in 2007, with 61 percent being consumed in the electricity sector. It is estimated that electricity demand will grow at 1 200 MW per annum over the next 20 years. This would require at least 8 new power stations. However, most of Eskom’s sources for coal are expected to be depleted in the next 15 years, posing an inevitable question of where all the coal is going to come from. The ever growing energy demands, coupled with the depletion of coal reserves in other major coalfields, have led to several major developments being undertaken within the Waterberg area. One of the most significant developments is the expansion of power generation by building new power stations as well as expanding the existing 4 000 MW Matimba Power station, which already sources all its coal requirements from the Grootegeluk mine. Exxaro has devised a three – phase development plan for the Waterberg. Phase 1 of the plan involves brown fields expansion of the current Grootegeluk coal mine to be able to supply Matimba power station with an extra 7.5 Mt between 2009 and 2015. The company has reached an agreement with Eskom to supply a total of 14,6 Mt/year of coal to the Medupi power station, which is now under construction adjacent Grootegeluk mine. In 10 – 12 years time, a new coal mine is expected to produce 10 Mt of coal, signalling Phase 3 of the development plan. South Africa’s dependence on coal for its elctricity needs is unlikely to change in the next two decades owing to the relative lack of alternatives to coal as an energy source. However, supply disruptions and sustained strong demand for South African low grade coal in Asian markets are threats to low grade coal availability to Eskom. Although South Africa’s newly approved nuclear policy would allow the country to diversify its primary energy sources, it would not lead to Uranium playing a dominant role in South Africa’s energy mix. Exploitation of the Waterberg Coalfield therefore remains the key to the country’s future electricity needs.
Recommended publications
  • Georesources and Environment Mining of the Waterberg
    International Journal of IJGE 2018 4(3): 127-132 Georesources and Environment http://ijge.camdemia.ca, [email protected] Available at http://ojs.library.dal.ca/ijge Research and Development and Industry Mining of the Waterberg - a Unique Deposit Requiring Innovative Solutions Chabedi Kelello1*, Mhlongo Sifiso2 1 Department School of Mining Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa 2 Exxaro Grootegeluk Coal Mine, Lephalale Limpopo, South Africa Abstract: The Waterberg coalfield is a resource for the future contribution of energy in South Africa and has been marginally exploited to date. The coal deposit is technically unique and challenging. The carbonaceous nature of the overburden, interburden, the coal intercalations and discard makes it prone to spontaneous combustion. The coal has a high percentage of ash and low yields after beneficiation. Another unique feature of this coalfield is that it is a multi-seam coal deposit with a total of 13 benches occurring over a total thickness of 110m. Only one large open pit mine is currently in operation at the Grootegeluk Colliery despite the size of the resource. The mine has innovatively exploited the coal deposit profitability despite these challenges. Grootegeluk Colliery produces about 86 million tonnes ex-pit. The ROM produced in 2015 was about 54 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) and the total waste produced was about 32 Mtpa making it one of the largest open pits in the history of South Africa. The paper discusses the state of the current mining and beneficiation techniques being used at the mine to exploit this vast reserve of the Waterberg coalfield which is the future coal supply of South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Coalfields – a 2014 Perspective
    South Africa's coalfields – a 2014 perspective 1Hancox, P. John and 2,3Götz, Annette E. 1University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geosciences, Private Bag 3, 2050 Wits, South Africa; [email protected] 2University of Pretoria, Department of Geology, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa; [email protected] 3Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation Highlights • South Africa’s Coalfields are presented. • The role of Gondwanan coals as palaeoclimate archives is stated. • Future research fields include palynology, sequence stratigraphy, basin fill. Abstract For well over a century and a half coal has played a vital role in South Africa’s economy and currently bituminous coal is the primary energy source for domestic electricity generation, as well as being the feedstock for the production of a substantial percentage of the country’s liquid fuels. It furthermore provides a considerable source of foreign revenue from exports. Based on geographic considerations, and variations in the sedimentation, origin, formation, distribution and quality of the coals, 19 coalfields are generally recognised in South Africa. This paper provides an updated review of their exploration and exploitation histories, general geology, and coal seam nomenclature and coal qualities. Within the various coalfields autocyclic variability is the norm rather than the exception, whereas allocyclic variability is much less so, and allows for the correlation of genetically related sequences. During the mid-Jurassic break up of Gondwana most of the coals bearing successions were intruded by dolerite. These intrusions are important as they may cause devolatilisation and burning of the coal, create structural disturbances and related seam correlation problems, and difficulties in mining operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves Report (Cmrr) 0
    Exxaro 2015 consolidated mineral resources and ore reserves report aro 2015 consolidated mineral resources and ore reserves report 2015 CONSOLIDATED MINERAL RESOURCES AND ORE RESERVES REPORT (CMRR) 0 Exxaro 2015 consolidated mineral resources and ore reserves report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. 3 1 FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................ 4 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 3 TENURE ..................................................................................................................................... 12 4 GOVERNANCE .......................................................................................................................... 15 5 COMPETENT PERSONS .......................................................................................................... 16 6 RISK, LIABILITY AND ASSURANCE ....................................................................................... 17 7 GROUP SUMMARY OF RESOURCE
    [Show full text]
  • Final IDP 2014/2016
    LEPHALALE MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2014-2016 OFFICE CONTACT DETAILS Physical address: Civic Centre C/O Joe Slovo and Douwater Road Overwacht Postal Address: Lephalale Municipality Private Bag x136 Lephalale Telephone Number: 014 763 2193 Facsimile Number: 014 763 5662 Website: www.lephalale.gov.za Email: [email protected] 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations 3 A.1. Vision Statement 6 A. 1.2. Executive Summary 8 1.3.1 Policies and Legislative Framework 13 1.4. Powers and Functions 21 1.4.1 Lephalale Municipality Priority issues 23 B.2. Demographic Profile 29 2.2. National Development Plan Focus Area 32 C.3. Spatial Economy and Development Rationale 38 3.3. Environmental 60 3.4. Climate Change and Global warming 65 3.4.1 Waste Management 68 D. Service Delivery and Infrastructure Development 74 4. Water 74 4.2. Sanitation 87 4.3. Electricity 92 4.4. Roads and Storm Water 101 1 4.5. Public Transport 106 5. Social Services 118 5.1. Integrated Human Settlement 118 5.2. Education and Training 125 5.3. Health and Social Services 127 5.4. Fire and Rescue Services and Disaster and Risk Management 131 5.5. Sports, Arts and Culture 137 5.6 Safety Security and Liaison 138 6. Local Economic Development 139 7. Financial Management and Viability 154 8. Good Governance and Public Participation 168 8.2 Institutional Development and Transformation 173 9. SWOT Analysis 184 D. Strategic Alignment 191 E. Sector Plans 225 F. Development Strategies Programmes and Projects 227 10. Approval 270 2 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS IDP Integrated development
    [Show full text]
  • Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy
    P WMA 01/000/00/02914/11A Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy DRAFT RECONCILIATION STRATEGY Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy i Project Name: Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy Report Title: Draft Reconciliation Strategy Authors: J Lombaard DWS Report No.: P WMA 01/000/00/02914/11A DWSContract No. WP 10768 PSP Project Reference No.: 60326619 Status of Report: Draft Date: September 2016 CONSULTANTS: AECOM in association with Hydrosol, Jones & Wagener and VSA Rebotile Metsi Consulting. Approved for AECOM: FGB de Jager JD Rossouw Task Leader Study Leader DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION (DWS): Directorate: National Water Resources Planning Approved for DWS: Reviewed: Dr BL Mwaka T Nditwani Director: Water Resources Planning Acting Director: National Water Resource Systems Planning Prepared by: AECOM SA (Pty) Ltd PO Box 3173 Pretoria 0001 In association with: Hydrosol Consulting Jones & Wagener VSA Rebotile Metsi Consulting P WMA 01/000/02914/11A - Draft Reconciliation Strategy Report Draft Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy ii Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy Date: September 2016 Phase 1: Study planning and Process PWMA 01/000/00/02914/1 Initiation Inception Report Phase 2: Study Implementation PWMA 01/000/00/02914/2 Literature Review PWMA 01/000/00/02914/3/1 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/3 Supporting Document 1: Hydrological Analysis Rainfall Data Analysis PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4/1 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4 Supporting Document
    [Show full text]
  • Water Risks of Coal Driven Mega Projects in Limpopo: the MCWAP and the EMSEZ
    Water risks of coal driven mega projects in Limpopo: the MCWAP and the EMSEZ Figure 1. Artist impression of proposed Electro Metallurgical Special Economic Zone (EMSEZ) between Musina and Makhado (from EMSEZ website). Victor Munnik, Society Work and Politics (SWOP) Institute, University of the Witwatersrand May 2020 1 Preface The proposed Electro Metallurgical Special Economic Zone (EMSEZ) threat in Makhado is both a huge risk to water users and the environment in the Limpopo valley, and difficult to take seriously, since it has so many irrational aspects. For that reason many NGO researchers have been reluctant to become involved in a complicated issue in what could be a waste of time and money. A word of thanks is thus due to Richard Worthington at Friedrich Ebert Foundation who commissioned this piece in order to get this work done. I sincerely hope that this will be useful to fellow activists and to decision makers. This report focuses specifically on the water aspects of the EMSEZ, which I believe is a major threat, although together with other activists I wonder about the likelihood of the EMSEZ plans. The Mokolo Crocodile West Augmentation Project (MCWAP) is also discussed in this report, as an example of how fossil fuel development can still have dire water implications five decades after the start of coal mining and coal fired power generation, and a caution that even failed mega projects, as the EMSEZ is likely to be, have a cost to people and the environment. This report relies on a close reading of the Department of Water and Sanitation’s 2016 Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy, as well as the October 2018 DWS Master Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Ecotoxicological
    A COMPARATIVE ECOTOXICOLOGICAL STUDY OF TWO MAJOR SOUTH AFRICAN RIVER SYSTEMS: A CATCHMENT SCALE APPROACH FOR IMPROVED RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF ABIOTIC, BIOTIC, BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR ENDPOINTS By Arno Reed de Klerk Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Natural Sciences Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Anna-Maria Botha-Oberholster (Genetics Department) Co-supervisor: Prof. Johannes H van Wyk (Department of Botany and Zoology) Co-supervisor: Prof. Paul J Oberholster (Department of Botany and Zoology; CSIR: NRE) December 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION 1 By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. This dissertation includes two original papers published in peer-reviewed journals and three unpublished publications. The development and writing of the papers (published and unpublished) were the principal responsibility of myself and, for each of the cases where this is not the case, a declaration is included in the dissertation, indicating the nature and extent of the contributions of the co-authors. Signature: Declaration with signature in possession of candidate and supervisor Date: Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT Along with the prosperity of humankind, the inevitable increase in developments to support this often results in water resources becoming repositories for the waste generated by such progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Donavan Henning Nemai Consulting 147 Bram Fischer Drive Randburg 2194 by Email: [email protected]
    Donavan Henning Nemai Consulting 147 Bram Fischer Drive Randburg 2194 By email: [email protected] Your ref: 10580/20180301 Our ref: NL/RH 11 April 2018 Dear Sir COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCOPING REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED MOKOLO AND CROCODILE RIVER (WEST) WATER AUGMENTATION PROJECT (PHASE 2) 1 We act for Earthlife Africa NPC (“Earthlife”)1 and groundWork2 (“our clients”). The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), Earthlife and groundWork, form part of the Life After Coal Campaign, a campaign which aims to discourage investment in new coal-fired power stations and mines; accelerate the retirement of South Africa’s coal infrastructure; and enable a just transition to renewable energy systems for the people.3 2 We confirm that our clients have been duly registered as interested and affected parties (I&APs) in relation to this project. 3 We submit these comments in response to the notification of 1 March 2018 titled “notice of review of draft scoping reports and public meetings in respect of the proposed Mokolo and Crocodile River (West) Water Augmentation Project (Phase 2)” (“MCWAP-2”, or the “project”). 4 We note that the notification refers to three separate components of MCWAP-2, namely: “Water Transfer Infrastructure - transfer of water from Crocodile River (West) to the Steenbokpan and Lephalale areas; Borrow Pits - sourcing of construction material for the water transfer infrastructure; and River Management System - manage abstractions from, and the river flow in, the Crocodile River (West) between Hartbeespoort Dam and Vlieëpoort Weir, the Moretele River from Klipvoor Dam to the confluence with the Crocodile River (West), the stretch of Elands River from Vaalkop Dam to Crocodile confluence, and also the required flow past Vlieëpoort”, but that the Scoping Report only deals with the first component – the water transfer infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Savannah Environmental Pty Ltd
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT/ ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME AMENDMENT PROCESS EIA/EMP REPORT COAL SILO, COAL CONVEYOR AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE BETWEEN GROOTEGELUK COAL MINE AND MEDUPI POWER STATION, LIMPOPO PROVINCE MINING RIGHT REFERENCE NO: 5/3/2/50 Submitted to: Department of Mineral Resources, Limpopo Province JUNE 2010 Prepared for: EXXARO Resources PO Box 9229 PRETORIA 0001 Prepared by: Savannah Environmental Pty Ltd Unit 606, 1410 Eglin office park 4 Eglin road, sunninghill, Gauteng po box 148, sunninghill, 2157 Tel: +27 (0)11 234 6621 Fax: +27 (0)86 684 0547 E-mail: [email protected] www.savannahsa.com EMP AMENDMENT FOR GROOTEGELUK COAL MINE, LIMPOPO PROVINCE: Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management Programme June 2010 PROJECT DETAILS Mining Right : 5/3/2/50 Reference No. Title : Environmental Impact Assessment/ Environmental Management Programme Amendment Process Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management Programme Coal Silo, Coal Conveyor and Associated Infrastructure between Grootegeluk Coal Mine and Medupi Power Station, Limpopo Province Authors : Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd Jo-Anne Thomas Specialists : Bathusi Environmental Consultants Johnny van Schalkwyk Client : Eskom Holdings Limited on behalf of EXXARO Report Status : Scoping Report for authority review Date : June 2010 When used as a reference this report should be cited as: Savannah Environmental (2010) EIA & EMP Report: Coal Silo, Coal Conveyor and Associated Infrastructure between Grootegeluk Coal Mine and Medupi Power Station, Limpopo Province COPYRIGHT RESERVED This technical report has been produced for Eskom Holdings Limited and EXXARO. The intellectual property contained in this report remains vested in Savannah Environmental. No part of the report may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from Eskom Holdings Limited, EXXARO or Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review Report
    Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy Date: December 2015 Phase 1: Study planning and Process PWMA 01/000/00/02914/1 Initiation Inception Report Phase 2: Study Implementation PWMA 01/000/00/02914/2 Literature Review PWMA 01/000/00/02914/3/1 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/3 Supporting Document 1: Hydrological Analysis Rainfall Data Analysis PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4/1 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4 Supporting Document 1: Water Requirements and Return Flows Irrigation Assessment PWMA 01/000/00/02914/5 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4/2 Water Quality Assessment Supporting Document 2: Water Conservation and Water Demand PWMA 01/000/00/02914/6 Management (WCWDM) Status Groundwater Assessment and Utilisation PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4/3 Supporting Document 3: PWMA 01/000/00/02914/7 Socio-Economic Perspective on Water Yield analysis (WRYM) Requirements PWMA 01/000/00/02914/8 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/7/1 Water Quality Modelling Supporting Document 1: Reserve Requirement Scenarios PWMA 01/000/00/02914/9 Planning Analysis (WRPM) PWMA 01/000/00/02914/10/1 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/10 Supporting Document 1: Water Supply Schemes Opportunities for Water Reuse PWMA 01/000/00/02914/11A PWMA 01/000/00/02914/10/2 Preliminary Reconciliation Strategy Supporting Document 2: Environmental and Social Status Quo PWMA 01/000/00/02914/11B Final Reconciliation Strategy PWMA 01/000/00/02914/10/3 Supporting Document 3: PWMA 01/000/00/02914/12 Screening Workshop Starter Document International Obligations PWMA 01/000/00/02914/13 Training Report P WMA 01/000/00/02914/14 Phase 3: Study Termination Close-out Report PWMA 01/000/00/02914/2– Literature Review Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Report
    Report No. 64977-ZA Report No. 48634 -ZR Investigation Report South Africa: Eskom Investment Support Project (IBRD Loan No. 78620-ZA) November 21, 2011 About the Panel The Inspection Panel was created in September 1993 by the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank to serve as an independent mechanism to ensure accountability in Bank operations with respect to its policies and procedures. The Inspection Panel is an instrument for groups of two or more private citizens who believe that they or their interests have been or could be harmed by Bank-financed activities to present their concerns through a Request for Inspection. In short, the Panel provides a link between the Bank and the people who are likely to be affected by the projects it finances. Members of the Panel are selected ―on the basis of their ability to deal thoroughly and fairly with the request brought to them, their integrity and their independence from the Bank‘s Management, and their exposure to developmental issues and to living conditions in developing countries.‖1 The three-member Panel is empowered, subject to Board approval, to investigate problems that are alleged to have arisen as a result of the Bank having failed to comply with its own operating policies and procedures. The Panel‘s work embraces the fundamental principles of independence, integrity, and impartiality. These cornerstone principles enable the Panel to respond to the issues raised and to provide technically sound, independent assessments to the Bank‘s Board. Processing Requests After the Panel receives a Request for Inspection, it is processed as follows: • The Panel decides whether the Request is prima facie not barred from Panel consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Coal Desktop Study INDEX
    Annexure Q South African Coal Desktop Study INDEX INTRODUCTION .....................................................................2 4. New Denmark Colliery ..................................................20 WATERBERG COALFIELD.................................................20 THE SOUTH AFRICAN COALFIELDS ...................3 Grootegeluk Colliery ..........................................................20 1. Witbank .................................................................................4 VEREENEGING-SASOLBURG COALFIELD ..............21 2. Highveld ................................................................................4 New Vaal Colliery .................................................................21 3. Waterberg .............................................................................5 ..........................................................21 4. Vereeniging-Sasolburg ....................................................5 ERMELO COALFIELD Savmore Colliery ..................................................................21 5. Ermelo ....................................................................................6 6. Klipriver .................................................................................7 KLIPRIVIER COALFIELD ....................................................22 7. Vryheid ...................................................................................7 1. Slater Coal (Forbes Coal) ..............................................22 8. Utrecht ...................................................................................8
    [Show full text]