DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparative Ecotoxicological

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A COMPARATIVE ECOTOXICOLOGICAL STUDY OF TWO MAJOR SOUTH AFRICAN RIVER SYSTEMS: A CATCHMENT SCALE APPROACH FOR IMPROVED RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF ABIOTIC, BIOTIC, BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR ENDPOINTS By Arno Reed de Klerk Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Natural Sciences Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Anna-Maria Botha-Oberholster (Genetics Department) Co-supervisor: Prof. Johannes H van Wyk (Department of Botany and Zoology) Co-supervisor: Prof. Paul J Oberholster (Department of Botany and Zoology; CSIR: NRE) December 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION 1 By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. This dissertation includes two original papers published in peer-reviewed journals and three unpublished publications. The development and writing of the papers (published and unpublished) were the principal responsibility of myself and, for each of the cases where this is not the case, a declaration is included in the dissertation, indicating the nature and extent of the contributions of the co-authors. Signature: Declaration with signature in possession of candidate and supervisor Date: Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT Along with the prosperity of humankind, the inevitable increase in developments to support this often results in water resources becoming repositories for the waste generated by such progress. To ensure sustainable development, anthropogenic impacts need to be properly assessed and anticipated in order to respond accordingly to mitigate such events. With the Mokolo River being at the center of plans to exploit the largest remaining coalfield in South Africa, this study was initiated to improve our understanding of the range of expected water resource impacts that may occur, by taking lessons learned from the upper Olifants River system, which has been severely impacted by coal mining for more than a century. The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative ecotoxicological study at a catchment scale on both the Mokolo River and upper Olifants River systems. Study sites in the upper Olifants and Mokolo rivers, their major tributaries, as well as major impoundments were selected and assessed seasonally for a number of years. Water and sediment samples were analyzed for various constituents, whilst biological samples (invertebrates and fish) were also sampled to gain perspectives on the impact of pollution at molecular, cellular and community levels. Lastly, a case study to examine the potential use of rehabilitation measures on ecological infrastructure to mitigate the potential impact of acid mine drainage (associated with coal mining activities) was conducted. Important abiotic ecosystem drivers were identified, whilst the influence of the tributaries and impoundments on the main stream rivers were determined. The major exposure routes of bioaccumulation were found to be through the dietary uptake of contaminated sediment and algae. The use of the fresh water crab, Potamonautes warreni, provided an excellent model organism to study the fate, transport and impact of pollution and also to monitor various degrees of molecular and cellular impacts. In contrast to the general use of fish as bioindicators, the use of aquatic invertebrate community structures and freshwater crabs proved more useful to characterize the ecosystem integrity of these systems, detect turnover and determine the links with possible contaminants. From the various biochemical and molecular markers used, several endpoints proved useful in monitoring chronic impacts on biota, which may be used as early warning indicators, whilst others are linked to acute anthropogenic impacts. A significant improvement in water quality occurred after the wetland rehabilitation case study, including increased productivity, reduced toxicity (embryotoxicity and teratogenicity) and changes in the biotic community structures. Therefore, the benefit of the rehabilitation of ecological infrastructure to mitigate the impact of coal mining associated pollution was iii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za proven. Overall, the use of a comparative catchment approach, employing both an impacted and less impacted river system, proved extremely useful and valuable to support the future management of the Mokolo River in the face of ever increasing land use activities. This catchment scale comparative study is a rare and unique opportunity which few studies are able to utilize to assess the likely impacts of future land use change. iv Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za OPSOMMING Tesame met die welvaart van die mensdom, veroorsaak die onvermydelike styging in ontwikkelings om dit te ondersteun dikwels dat waterbronne bewaarplekke word vir afval wat gegenereer word tydens die vordering. Ten einde volhoubare ontwikkeling te verseker, is dit nodig om antropogeniese invloede behoorlik te evalueer en te verwag om sodoende dienooreenkomstig te reageer op sulke gebeurtenisse, sodat die impak verminder kan word. Met die Mokolorivier wat te midde is van planne om die grootste oorblywende steenkoolveld in Suid-Afrika te ontgin, is hierdie studie geïnisieer om ons begrip van die omvang van die verwagte waterbron impakte wat mag voorkom, te verbeter deur te leer uit vorige ervarings in die boonste Olifantsrivier, wat erg geraak is deur steenkoolmynbou vir meer as 'n eeu. Die doel van hierdie studie was om 'n vergelykende ekotoksikologiese studie te doen op 'n opvangsgebied skaal op beide die Mokolo- en boonste Olifantsriviere. Studie areas in die boonste Olifants- en Mokoloriviere, hulle hoof sytakke en damme is gekies en seisoenaal geassesseer vir 'n aantal jare. Water en sediment monsters is ontleed vir verskillende parameters, terwyl biologiese monsters (invertebrata en visse) ook versamel is om die uitwerking van besoedeling te bepaal op 'n molekulêre, sellulêre en gemeenskapsvlak. Laastens was 'n gevallestudie gedoen om die potensiële gebruik van rehabilitasie van ekologiese infrastruktuur om die impak van suur mynwater (geassosieer met steenkoolmyn aktiwiteite) te verminder, ondersoek. Belangrike abiotiese ekosisteem drywers is geïdentifiseer, terwyl die invloed van die sytakke en damme op die hoofstroom riviere bepaal was. Die grootste blootstellingsroetes van bioakkumulering is gevind om deur die opname van gekontamineerde sediment en alge te wees. Die gebruik van die varswater krap, Potamonautes warreni, is 'n uitstekende modelorganisme om die lot, vervoer en impak van besoedeling te bestudeer, asook om verskillende grade van molekulêre en sellulêre impakte te monitor. In kontras met die algemene gebruik van visse as bio-indikators het die gebruik van akwatiese invertebraat gemeenskapstrukture en varswater krappe bewys dat dit meer bruikbaar is om ekosisteem integriteit te beskryf, omsette te bepaal, asook die verbintenisse met moontlike besoedeling te bepaal. Vanuit die verskillende biochemiese en molekulêre biomerkers wat gebruik is, het verskeie eindpunte bewys om nuttig te wees in die monitering van kroniese impakte op biota, wat gebruik kan word as vroeë waarskuwingsindikators, terwyl ander gekoppel is aan akute antropogeniese impakte. Daar was 'n beduidende verbetering in die waterkwaliteit na die rehabilitasieproses van die vleiland, insluitend 'n toename in produktiwiteit, verminderde toksisiteit (embriotoksisiteit en v Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za teratogenisiteit) en verandering in die biotiese gemeenskapstrukture. Hierdeur was die nuttigheid van die rehabilitasie van ekologiese infrastruktuur om die impak van steenkoolmyn geassosieerde besoedeling te verminder, bewys. Dus, die gebruik van 'n vergelykende opvangsgebied benadering, deur die gebruik van beide 'n besoedelde en onbesoedelde rivierstelsel, is baie nuttig om die toekomstige bestuur van die Mokolorivier te ondersteun in die aangesig van toenemende antropogeniese aktiwiteite. Hierdie vergelykende studie op opvangsgebied skaal is 'n seldsame en unieke geleentheid wat min studies in staat is om aan te wend om die waarskynlike impak van veranderings in toekomstige grondgebruik te evalueer. vi Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the following persons and institutions for their assistance during the undertaking of this study: • My supervisors, Professors A-M Botha, JH van Wyk and PJ Oberholster, for their mentorship, support, patience and guidance during this study. • The Department of Genetics, as well as the Department of Botany and Zoology from the Stellenbosch University for the use of their facilities. • The Coaltech Research Association for their financial support and for all their assistance during the study. • The Water Research Commission of South Africa (WRC) (project K5/2203) for their financial support. • The National Research Foundation (NRF), Technology and Human Resources for Industry Program (THRIP) (Grant No. TP2011072900027) for their financial support. • The Olifants River Forum (ORF) for their financial support. • The South African Department of Environmental Affairs (Working for Wetlands) for their contributions
Recommended publications
  • Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa The

    Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa The

    This article was downloaded by: On: 12 May 2010 Access details: Access Details: Free Access Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t917447442 The geomorphic provinces of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: A physiographic subdivision for earth and environmental scientists T. C. Partridge a; E. S. J. Dollar b; J. Moolman c;L. H. Dollar b a Climatology Research Group, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS, South Africa b CSIR, Natural Resources and Environment, Stellenbosch, South Africa c Directorate: Resource Quality Services, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa Online publication date: 23 March 2010 To cite this Article Partridge, T. C. , Dollar, E. S. J. , Moolman, J. andDollar, L. H.(2010) 'The geomorphic provinces of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: A physiographic subdivision for earth and environmental scientists', Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 65: 1, 1 — 47 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/00359191003652033 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00359191003652033 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date.
  • An Assessment of Fish and Fisheries in Impoundments in the Upper Orange-Senqu River Basin and Lower Vaal River Basin

    An Assessment of Fish and Fisheries in Impoundments in the Upper Orange-Senqu River Basin and Lower Vaal River Basin

    AN ASSESSMENT OF FISH AND FISHERIES IN IMPOUNDMENTS IN THE UPPER ORANGE-SENQU RIVER BASIN AND LOWER VAAL RIVER BASIN Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements in respect of the Doctoral Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Zoology and Entomology in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences at the University of the Free State by LEON MARTIN BARKHUIZEN 1 July 2015 Promoters: Prof. O.L.F. Weyl and Prof. J.G. van As Table of contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ vi Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. ix List of tables ....................................................................................................................................... xii List of figures ....................................................................................................................................... xv List of some acronyms used in text .................................................................................................. xviii Chapter 1 General introduction and thesis outline ...................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 General Literature Review ........................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................
  • Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton

    Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton

    Marine and Petroleum Geology 33 (2012) 92e116 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine and Petroleum Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpetgeo Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic sedimentary sequence stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton Adam J. Bumby a,*, Patrick G. Eriksson a, Octavian Catuneanu b, David R. Nelson c, Martin J. Rigby a,1 a Department of Geology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa b Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Canada c SIMS Laboratory, School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia article info abstract Article history: The Kaapvaal Craton hosts a number of Precambrian sedimentary successions which were deposited Received 31 August 2010 between 3105 Ma (Dominion Group) and 1700 Ma (Waterberg Group) Although younger Precambrian Received in revised form sedimentary sequences outcrop within southern Africa, they are restricted either to the margins of the 27 September 2011 Kaapvaal Craton, or are underlain by orogenic belts off the edge of the craton. The basins considered in Accepted 30 September 2011 this work are those which host the Witwatersrand and Pongola, Ventersdorp, Transvaal and Waterberg Available online 8 October 2011 strata. Many of these basins can be considered to have formed as a response to reactivation along lineaments, which had initially formed by accretion processes during the amalgamation of the craton Keywords: Kaapvaal during the Mid-Archaean. Faulting along these lineaments controlled sedimentation either directly by Witwatersrand controlling the basin margins, or indirectly by controlling the sediment source areas. Other basins are Ventersdorp likely to be more controlled by thermal affects associated with mantle plumes.
  • Heritage Report-Paul Roux

    Heritage Report-Paul Roux

    Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment for proposed new 1.5 km-long underground sewerage pipeline in Paul Roux, Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality, Free State Province. Report prepared by Paleo Field Services PO Box 38806, Langenhovenpark 9330 16 / 02 / 2020 Summary A heritage impact assessment was carried for a proposed new 1.5 km-long underground sewerage pipeline in Paul Roux in the Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality, Free State Province. The study area is situated on the farm Farm Mary Ann 712, next to the N5 national road covering a section of the Sand River floodplain which is located on the eastern outskirts of Paul Roux . The proposed footprint is underlain by well-developed alluvial and geologically recent overbank sediments of the Sand River. Investigation of exposed alluvial cuttings next to the bridge crossing shows little evidence of intact Quaternary fossil remains. Potentially fossil-bearing Tarkastad Subgroup and younger Molteno Formation strata are exposed to the southwest of the study area. These outcrops will not be impacted by the proposed development. There are no major palaeontological grounds to suspend the proposed development. The study area consists for the most part of open grassland currently used for cattle grazing. The foot survey revealed little evidence of in situ Stone Age archaeological material, capped or distributed as surface scatters on the landscape. There are also no indications of rock art, prehistoric structures or other historical structures or buildings older than 60 years within the vicinity of the study area. A large cemetery is located directly west of the proposed footprint. The modern bridge construction at the Sand River crossing is not considered to be of historical significance.
  • Georesources and Environment Mining of the Waterberg

    Georesources and Environment Mining of the Waterberg

    International Journal of IJGE 2018 4(3): 127-132 Georesources and Environment http://ijge.camdemia.ca, [email protected] Available at http://ojs.library.dal.ca/ijge Research and Development and Industry Mining of the Waterberg - a Unique Deposit Requiring Innovative Solutions Chabedi Kelello1*, Mhlongo Sifiso2 1 Department School of Mining Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa 2 Exxaro Grootegeluk Coal Mine, Lephalale Limpopo, South Africa Abstract: The Waterberg coalfield is a resource for the future contribution of energy in South Africa and has been marginally exploited to date. The coal deposit is technically unique and challenging. The carbonaceous nature of the overburden, interburden, the coal intercalations and discard makes it prone to spontaneous combustion. The coal has a high percentage of ash and low yields after beneficiation. Another unique feature of this coalfield is that it is a multi-seam coal deposit with a total of 13 benches occurring over a total thickness of 110m. Only one large open pit mine is currently in operation at the Grootegeluk Colliery despite the size of the resource. The mine has innovatively exploited the coal deposit profitability despite these challenges. Grootegeluk Colliery produces about 86 million tonnes ex-pit. The ROM produced in 2015 was about 54 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) and the total waste produced was about 32 Mtpa making it one of the largest open pits in the history of South Africa. The paper discusses the state of the current mining and beneficiation techniques being used at the mine to exploit this vast reserve of the Waterberg coalfield which is the future coal supply of South Africa.
  • Early History of South Africa

    Early History of South Africa

    THE EARLY HISTORY OF SOUTH AFRICA EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES . .3 SOUTH AFRICA: THE EARLY INHABITANTS . .5 THE KHOISAN . .6 The San (Bushmen) . .6 The Khoikhoi (Hottentots) . .8 BLACK SETTLEMENT . .9 THE NGUNI . .9 The Xhosa . .10 The Zulu . .11 The Ndebele . .12 The Swazi . .13 THE SOTHO . .13 The Western Sotho . .14 The Southern Sotho . .14 The Northern Sotho (Bapedi) . .14 THE VENDA . .15 THE MASHANGANA-TSONGA . .15 THE MFECANE/DIFAQANE (Total war) Dingiswayo . .16 Shaka . .16 Dingane . .18 Mzilikazi . .19 Soshangane . .20 Mmantatise . .21 Sikonyela . .21 Moshweshwe . .22 Consequences of the Mfecane/Difaqane . .23 Page 1 EUROPEAN INTERESTS The Portuguese . .24 The British . .24 The Dutch . .25 The French . .25 THE SLAVES . .22 THE TREKBOERS (MIGRATING FARMERS) . .27 EUROPEAN OCCUPATIONS OF THE CAPE British Occupation (1795 - 1803) . .29 Batavian rule 1803 - 1806 . .29 Second British Occupation: 1806 . .31 British Governors . .32 Slagtersnek Rebellion . .32 The British Settlers 1820 . .32 THE GREAT TREK Causes of the Great Trek . .34 Different Trek groups . .35 Trichardt and Van Rensburg . .35 Andries Hendrik Potgieter . .35 Gerrit Maritz . .36 Piet Retief . .36 Piet Uys . .36 Voortrekkers in Zululand and Natal . .37 Voortrekker settlement in the Transvaal . .38 Voortrekker settlement in the Orange Free State . .39 THE DISCOVERY OF DIAMONDS AND GOLD . .41 Page 2 EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES Humankind had its earliest origins in Africa The introduction of iron changed the African and the story of life in South Africa has continent irrevocably and was a large step proven to be a micro-study of life on the forwards in the development of the people.
  • Conference Proceedings 2006

    Conference Proceedings 2006

    FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10 TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE STERKFONTEIN DAM, HARRISMITH 07 – 09 APRIL 2006 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING & DISTRIBUTION SPONSORED BY: sappi 1 CONTENTS Page List of participants 3 Press release 4 Chairman’s address -Bill Mincher 5 The effects of pollution on fish and people – Dr Steve Mitchell 7 DWAF Quality Status Report – Upper Vaal Management Area 2000 – 2005 - Riana 9 Munnik Water: The full picture of quality management & technology demand – Dries Louw 17 Fish kills in the Vaal: What went wrong? – Francois van Wyk 18 Water Pollution: The viewpoint of Eco-Care Trust – Mornē Viljoen 19 Why the fish kills in the Vaal? –Synthesis of the five preceding presentations 22 – Dr Steve Mitchell The Elands River Yellowfish Conservation Area – George McAllister 23 Status of the yellowfish populations in Limpopo Province – Paul Fouche 25 North West provincial report on the status of the yellowfish species – Daan Buijs & 34 Hermien Roux Status of yellowfish in KZN Province – Rob Karssing 40 Status of the yellowfish populations in the Western Cape – Dean Impson 44 Regional Report: Northern Cape (post meeting)– Ramogale Sekwele 50 Yellowfish conservation in the Free State Province – Pierre de Villiers 63 A bottom-up approach to freshwater conservation in the Orange Vaal River basin – 66 Pierre de Villiers Status of the yellowfish populations in Gauteng Province – Piet Muller 69 Yellowfish research: A reality to face – Dr Wynand Vlok 72 Assessing the distribution & flow requirements of endemic cyprinids in the Olifants- 86 Doring river system - Bruce Paxton Yellowfish genetics projects update – Dr Wynand Vlok on behalf of Prof.
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment

    Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment

    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
  • Shakati Private Game Reserve in Malaria-Free Waterberg/Vaalwater -Only 2 Hours from Pretoria

    Shakati Private Game Reserve in Malaria-Free Waterberg/Vaalwater -Only 2 Hours from Pretoria

    Shakati Private Game Reserve in Malaria-free Waterberg/Vaalwater -only 2 hours from Pretoria Waterberg. There is so much to see and do…. Waterberg is the area of magnificent views, panoramic savannah and bush landscapes, spectacular mountains and cliffs, crystal clear streams and an unbelievable abundance of wild animals, trees and flowers. Game viewing in the Waterberg area is absolutely fantastic and recognised among the best in the country –hence the Waterberg is one of the preferred eco-tourism destination in South Africa. Furthermore Waterberg with its unspoilt nature has been designated as UNESCO “Savannah Biosphere Reserve” –the first in Southern Africa. And Waterberg is MALARIA-free… Marakele National Park Shakati Private Game Reserve is hidden away on the lush banks of the Mokolo river in the deep heart of the untamed Waterberg bushveld paradise. Near Vaalwater and only 2 hours drive from Pretoria. Time spent at Shakati Game Reserve is about getting away from city life, work, traffic and stress. It is about peace and tranquillity, clean fresh air and clear skies with the brightest stars you have probably ever seen. It is about being quiet and listen to the jackal calling at night, to the paradise flycatcher singing in the morning. It is about seeing and walking with the animals, touching the fruits of the bush willow -and wonder about nature. It is about quietly sitting at the water hole watching game and taking life easy Its time to leave the city sounds, the hustle, the bustle and find some place that speaks to you who you really are inside.
  • Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps

    Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps

    Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps DRAFT May 2009 South African National Biodiversity Institute Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Contents List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of figures............................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Criteria for identifying threatened ecosystems............................................................... 10 3 Summary of listed ecosystems ........................................................................................ 12 4 Descriptions and individual maps of threatened ecosystems ...................................... 14 4.1 Explanation of descriptions ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Listed threatened ecosystems ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Critically Endangered (CR) ................................................................................................................ 16 1. Atlantis Sand Fynbos (FFd 4) .......................................................................................................................... 16 2. Blesbokspruit Highveld Grassland
  • Limpopo Water Management Area

    Limpopo Water Management Area

    LIMPOPO WATER MANAGEMENT AREA WATER RESOURCES SITUATION ASSESSMENT MAIN REPORT OVERVIEW The water resources of South Africa are vital to the health and prosperity of its people, the sustenance of its natural heritage and to its economic development. Water is a national resource that belongs to all the people who should therefore have equal access to it, and although the resource is renewable, it is finite and distributed unevenly both spatially and temporally. The water also occurs in many forms that are all part of a unitary and inter-dependent cycle. The National Government has overall responsibility for and authority over the nation’s water resources and their use, including the equitable allocation of water for beneficial and sustainable use, the redistribution of water and international water matters. The protection of the quality of water resources is also necessary to ensure sustainability of the nation’s water resources in the interests of all water users. This requires integrated management of all aspects of water resources and, where appropriate, the delegation of management functions to a regional or catchment level where all persons can have representative participation. This report is based on a desktop or reconnaissance level assessment of the available water resources and quality and also patterns of water requirements that existed during 1995 in the Limpopo Water Management Area, which occupies a portion of the Northern Province. The report does not address the water requirements beyond 1995 but does provide estimates of the utilisable potential of the water resources after so-called full development of these resources, as this can be envisaged at present.
  • Rivers of South Africa Hi Friends

    Rivers of South Africa Hi Friends

    A Newsletter for Manzi’s Water Wise Club Members May 2016 Rivers of South Africa Hi Friends, This month we are exploring our rivers. We may take them for granted but they offer us great services. Rivers provide a home and food to a variety of animals. You will find lots of plants, insects, birds, freshwater animals and land animals near and in a river. You can say rivers are rich with different kinds of living things. These living things play different roles such as cleaning the river and providing food in the river for other animals. Rivers carry water and nutrients and they play an important part in the water cycle. We use rivers for water supply which we use for drinking, in our homes, watering in farms, making products in factories and generating electricity. Sailing, taking goods from one place to another and water sports such as swimming, skiing and fishing happens in most rivers. Have you ever wondered where rivers begin and end? Well friends, rivers begin high in the mountains or hills, or where a natural spring releases water from underground. They usually end by flowing into the ocean, sea or lake. The place where the river enters the ocean, sea or lake is called the mouth of the river. Usually there are lots of different living things there. Some rivers form tributaries of other rivers. A tributary is a stream or river that feeds into a larger stream or river. South Africa has the following major rivers: . Orange River (Lesotho, Free State & Northern Cape Provinces), Limpopo River (Limpopo Province), Vaal River (Mpumalanga, Gauteng, Free State & Northern Cape Provinces), Thukela River reprinted with permission withreprinted (Kwa-Zulu Natal Province), Olifants River – (Mpumalanga & Limpopo Provinces), Vol.