The Eighteenth Century: the Westernizers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Eighteenth Century: the Westernizers chapter 9 The Eighteenth Century: the Westernizers Unlike the preceding years, the final decade of the eighteenth century is one of the most studied periods in Ottoman history.1 Selim III (1789–1807) succeeded Abdülhamid in the course of the war against Russia and was determined to enforce decisive reforms and restore Ottoman power. Even before his ascen- sion, from 1786 on, he had been corresponding with the French king Louis XVI with the help of his tutor, Ebubekir Ratıb Efendi, as seen in the previous chap- ter, with a view to seeking advice and diplomatic support for his plans.2 At the beginning of his reign, he called an enlarged council, consisting of more than 200 administrators and military and religious officials to ask their opinion on how to restore Ottoman power. It is interesting to note that this was not a novelty; such councils (meşveret) were regularly held at many administra- tive levels and they became increasingly important in the second half of the eighteenth century.3 For instance, we have the minutes of the council called after the disaster at Maçin (1791), arguably the central event that set Selim’s thoughts into action.4 After the end of the 1787–92 war, Selim III asked a series of high administration officials to write memoranda on the situation of the army and the state and to propose reforms or amendments, and then set out to make radical changes, particularly in the military. In the janissary corps, ad- ministrative roles were allocated to special supervisors, while the former aghas were left with military tasks alone. What remained of the timariot system was rearranged, with special care given to producing a cavalry ready to fight during both summer and winter, thanks to a system of rotation; provincial governors were asked to recruit and train troops as reserves; the engineering schools, ini- tiated by Bonneval and Tott earlier, were expanded and enhanced; and foreign advisors were invited to contribute their knowledge to drilling and training the janissaries and other soldiers. Most importantly, an entirely new corps was cre- ated, the Nizam-i Cedid or “New order”. This was composed of youths recruit- ed in Anatolia; they were trained and commanded by European officers and 1 On the events of this period, see Shaw 1971; Mantran 1989, 425–445; Beydilli 2001, 70–90; Hanioğlu 2008, 42–71. 2 Uzunçarşılı 1938; Ratıb Efendi – Yıldız 2013. 3 See Aksan 2004, 21–22, and cf. Yaycıoğlu 2008, 144ff.; Yılmaz 2015a, 255–258. The preambles of the Nizam-i Cedid regulations often stress that these decisions were taken unanimously (ittifak-ı ara-yı ulema ve erbab-ı şura ile); see, for example, Koç – Yeşil 2012, 3, 60, 79, 95. 4 Yıldız 2016, 150–156. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/9789004385245_011 382 chapter 9 funded by specially allocated revenues, the irad-i cedid (“new revenues”).5 In addition, recent research has shown that, the new army apart, Selim’s reforms also had a centralizing aspect, specializing in population control and what has been called the “statistical” state, which was very much in line with features of “modernity” without being introduced from the West.6 Unfortunately for Selim, earlier troubles did not cease. In the Balkans, the power of the provincial notables reached new heights with Ali Pasha in Yanya and Pasvanoğlu Osman Pasha in Vidin creating nearly autonomous territories. On the other hand, the rearrangement in European alliances brought about by the French Revolution soon reached the Ottoman Empire with Napoleon’s invasion of Egypt (1798–1801), which ultimately resulted in enhanced power for provincial notables in Syria and Arabia and increased the role of Russia in the Balkans. What was perhaps more important was that the opposition to Selim’s military reforms, led by dispossessed members of the janissary corps (which, by that time, had come to represent a huge number of urban dwellers),7 fi- nally brought about his demise. After a first conflict in Edirne in 1806, which ended with Selim dismissing the commanders of the new troops that he him- self had selected, the following year a revolt erupted among the auxiliary forces of the janissaries (yamak) who were guarding the fortresses of the Bosphorus, under Kabakçı Mustafa.8 As had happened before, the rebels were soon joined by janissaries, ulema, and urban dwellers; Selim was forced to dismantle the Nizam-i Cedid and soon after to abdicate in favor of his cousin Mustafa IV. In response, the ayan of Ruşçuk and a former opponent of Selim, Bayraktar (or Alemdar) Mustafa Pasha, marched on Istanbul; in 1808 he entered the city with his army, as the chief of a committee of notables. He did not manage to rescue Selim, who was killed in the palace, but he overthrew Mustafa IV and put on the throne the young prince Mahmud II (1808–39). Mahmud’s reign began with an impressive document, the famous Sened-i ittifak or “Deed of alliance” (1808), which was signed by the sultan, the rep- resentatives of the government, and a group of provincial ayan, officially de- scribed as “great families” (hanedân), who had assembled in Istanbul. With this document, the latter had their local powers guaranteed in exchange for their support for the dynasty, and thus for the first time had their role in imperial 5 On Selim’s reforms see Shaw 1971; Karal 1988; Kenan 2010. 6 Başaran 2014, 82–105; Başaran – Kırlı 2015. 7 Quataert 1993; Sunar 2006; this process had begun in the mid-seventeenth century (Tezcan 2010a; Yılmaz Diko 2015). 8 On this rebellion see the detailed analysis in Yıldız 2008; Yıldız 2012. The analysis in Argun 2013, 271ff., argues that this was “much more about the collision of two rival elite cliques for apportion of human and material resources than that of reformist-conservative struggle”..
Recommended publications
  • Selim I–Mehmet Vi)
    CHRONOLOGY (SELIM I–MEHMET VI) Years of Sultan Important dates reign 1512–1520 Selim I Conquest of Egypt, Selim assumes the title of Caliph (1517) 1520–1566 Süleyman Vienna sieged (1529); War with Venice (1537–1540); Annexation of Hungary (1541) 1566–1574 Selim II Ottoman navy loses the battle of Lepanto (1571) 1574–1595 Murad III Janissary revolts (1589 and 1591–1592) 1595–1603 Mehmed III War with Austria continues (1595– ) 1603–1617 Ahmed I War with Austria ends; Buda is recovered (1604) 1617–1622 Osman II Janissaries murder Osman (1622) 1622–1623 Mustafa I Janissary Revolt (1622) 1623–1640 Murad IV Baghdad recovered (1638); War with Iran (1624–1639) 1640–1648 İbrahim I War with Venice (1645); Assassination of İbrahim (1648) 1648–1687 Mehmed IV Janissary dominance in Istanbul and anar- chy (1649–1651); War with Venice continues (1663); War with Austria, and siege of Vienna (1683) 1687–1691 Süleyman II Janissary revolt (1687); Austria’s occupation of Belgrade (1688) 1691–1695 Ahmed II War with Austria (1694) 1695–1703 Mustafa II Treaty of Karlowitz (1699); Janissary revolt and deposition of Mustafa (1703) 1703–1730 Ahmed III Refuge of Karl XII (1709); War with Venice (1714–1718); War with Austria (1716); Treaty of Passarowitz (1718); ix x REFORMING OTTOMAN GOVERNANCE Tulip Era (1718–1730) 1730–1754 Mahmud I War with Russia and Austria (1736–1759) 1754–1774 Mustafa III War with Russia (1768); Russian Fleet in the Aegean (1770); Inva- sion of the Crimea (1771) 1774–1789 Abdülhamid I Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (1774); War with Russia (1787)
    [Show full text]
  • 2Artboard 1 Copy
    From dancing and providing pleasure to the head of the Ottoman Empire Maidservants who ascended to the throne of the Ottoman Empire Under the ruling of the Ottomans, it was possible for any maidservant of unknown parentage and religion to instantly find herself sitting on the throne, controlling the lives of millions of Muslims. This is what historical sources say, which narrated how influential the maidservants were, in the era of the Ottoman Empire, and how they became mothers and wives of the Turkish sultans. The path was almost paved, it was enough for any maidservant, who knows how to seduce the Sultan, to make him fall in love with her in order to deliver him a child, and according to the Ottoman protocols, she becomes a wife, then a mother to the next sultan, a position that gives her sovereignty and an expected advantage over the throne of the Ottoman family, then dominating the fate of millions of Muslims in the countries occupied by the Ottoman Empire. Considering the weakness of the Turkish sultans as well, the task becomes easy, as most of the Ottomans family - according to historical sources - never panted after anything as much as women, and did nothing in their lives more than just lying in beds; some sultans never even left their palaces, in addition to the extravagance in purchasing maidservants from all over the world and being stacking them up in the Harem, where the place designated for them was in the palaces, which is something many leaders of the Ottoman Empire warned of, as many of the maidservants pretended to enter Islam and falling in love the Sultan, while in fact they are only spies for their countries of origin, which were hostile to the Ottoman Empire and to the Muslims at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Said Nursi
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2015 The Dialectics of Secularism and Revivalism in Turkey: The Case of Said Nursi Zubeyir Nisanci Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Nisanci, Zubeyir, "The Dialectics of Secularism and Revivalism in Turkey: The Case of Said Nursi" (2015). Dissertations. 1482. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1482 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2015 Zubeyir Nisanci LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO THE DIALECTICS OF SECULARISM AND REVIVALISM IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF SAID NURSI A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN SOCIOLOGY BY ZUBEYIR NISANCI CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2015 Copyright by Zubeyir Nisanci, 2015 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to Dr. Rhys H. Williams who chaired this dissertation project. His theoretical and methodological suggestions and advice guided me in formulating and writing this dissertation. It is because of his guidance that this study proved to be a very fruitful academic research and theoretical learning experience for myself. My gratitude also goes to the other members of the committee, Drs. Michael Agliardo, Laureen Langman and Marcia Hermansen for their suggestions and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MATERIAL CULTURE in the ISTANBUL HOUSES THROUGH the EYES of BRITISH TRAVELER JULIA PARDOE (D.1862)
    THE MATERIAL CULTURE IN THE ISTANBUL HOUSES THROUGH THE EYES OF BRITISH TRAVELER JULIA PARDOE (d.1862) by GÜLBAHAR RABİA ALTUNTAŞ Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University March 2017 © Gülbahar Rabia Altuntaş 2017 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE MATERIAL CULTURE IN THE ISTANBUL HOUSES THROUGH THE EYES OF BRITISH TRAVELER JULIA PARDOE (d.1862) Gülbahar Rabia Altuntaş M.A. in History Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Tülay Artan Keywords: Ottoman material culture, 19th century travel writings, middle-class travelers, Ottoman houses, decoration, interior design This thesis focuses on the domestic interiors and material worlds of Istnabul houses through Julia Pardoe’s travel account “The City of the Sultan; and Domestic Manners of the Turks, in 1836”. She traveled to Ottoman lands in 1836 and wrote of her experiences and observations in her account. Firstly, the thesis will present that Julia Pardoe's account was one of the early examples of 19th-century travel writings. It will analyze how travel writing was transformed in the 19th century by middle class women travelers through their critical approach to previous travelers and through their constructing of a new perspective and discourses. Secondly, the life of householders she visited will be evaluated to understand the atmosphere in these houses. This also allows us to position them within social hierarchy as either royal, high-ranking or upper middle class. Lastly, these houses will be analyzed on the basis of Pardoe’s detailed descriptions, considering the main issues of material culture such as comfort, heating, luxury, decoration and design.
    [Show full text]
  • Alemdar Mustafa Paşa'nin Devlet Hayati
    T.C. SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ ALEMDAR MUSTAFA PAŞA’NIN DEVLET HAYATI YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Mehmet ALKAN Enstitü Anabilim Dalı : Tarih Enstitü Bilim Dalı : Yakınçağ Tarihi Tez Danışmanı : Yrd. Doç. Dr. Turgut SUBAŞI HAZİRAN-2011 BEYAN Bu tezin yazılmasında bilimsel ahlak kurallarına uyulduğunu, baĢkalarının eserlerinden yararlanılması durumunda bilimsel normlara uygun olarak atıfta bulunulduğunu, kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmadığını, tezin herhangi bir kısmının bu üniversite veya baĢka bir üniversitede baĢka bir tez çalıĢması olarak sunulmadığını beyan ederim. Mehmet ALKAN 24/06/2011 ÖNSÖZ Bu çalıĢma dört bölümden oluĢmaktadır. Birinci bölümde Osmanlı Devleti’nde âyanlık müessesesi incelendi. Ġkinci bölümde Kabakçı Mustafa isyanı, IV. Mustafa’nın tahta çıkıĢı, Alemdar Mustafa PaĢa’nın Kabakçı Mustafa’yı öldürmesi, Serdarı Ekrem ile Ġstanbul’a hareketleri ve bu hususta Ruscuk Yaranı’nın faaliyetleri, Ġstanbul’a geliĢi ve isyancıların öldürülmesi üzerinde duruldu. Üçüncü bölümde ise Alemdar Mustafa PaĢa’nın Babıâli baskını, III. Selim’in Ģehit edilmesi, II. Mahmud’un tahta çıkması, Alemdar’ın sadrazamlığı, Sened-i Ġttifak’ın imzalanması ve Sekban’ı Cedit’in kurulması üzerinde duruldu. Bu çalıĢmanın son bölümü olan dördüncü bölümde de Alemdar Mustafa PaĢa’nın ölümü ve yaĢanan olaylar hakkında detaylı bilgi verildi. Bu çalıĢma yapılırken Alemdar Mustafa PaĢa ile ilgili orijinal bilgilere sahip olmak amacıyla BaĢbakanlık Osmanlı ArĢivi’nden yararlanılmıĢtır. ÇalıĢmamızda dönemin vekayinüvis tarihçilerinin çalıĢmaları ile arĢiv belgelerini karĢılaĢtırarak nesnel bilgiler vermeye özen gösterdik. Ayrıca çalıĢmada konumuza ıĢık tutan kitap ve makâle gibi eserlerde ihmal edilmemiĢtir. ÇalıĢmamızın her aĢamasında yakın ilgi ve desteğini gördüğüm değerli hocam Sayın Yrd. Doç. Dr. Turgut SUBAġIYA, ArĢiv belgelerinin okunmasında yardımlarını gördüğüm Yrd. Doç. Dr. M.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ISLAMIC COINS Athens at BY
    THE ATHENIANAGORA RESULTS OF EXCAVATIONS CONDUCTED BY THE AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS VOLUME IX THE ISLAMIC COINS Athens at BY GEORGE C. MILES Studies CC-BY-NC-ND. License: Classical of o go only. .,0,00 cc, 000, .4. *004i~~~a.L use School personal American © For THE AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 1962 American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to The Athenian Agora ® www.jstor.org PUBLISHED WITH THE AID OF A GRANT FROM MR. JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER, JR. Athens at Studies CC-BY-NC-ND. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED License: Classical of only. use School personal American © For PRINTED IN GERMANY at J.J. AUGUSTIN GLO CKSTADT PREFACE T he present catalogue is in a sense the continuation of the catalogue of coins found in the Athenian Agora published by MissMargaret Thompson in 1954, TheAthenian Agora: Results of the Excavations conductedby the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Volume II, Athens Coins from the Roman throughthe Venetian Period. Miss Thompson's volume dealt with the at Roman, Byzantine, Frankish, Mediaeval European and Venetian coins. It was in the spring of 1954 that on Professor Homer A. Thompson's invitation I stopped briefly at the Agora on my way home from a year in Egypt and made a quick survey of the Islamic coins found in the ex- cavations. During the two weeks spent in Athens on that occasion I looked rapidly through the coins and that their somewhat and their relative Studies reported despite unalluring appearance CC-BY-NC-ND.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ottoman Global Moment
    AN OTTOMAN GLOBAL MOMENT: WAR OF SECOND COALITION IN THE LEVANT A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History By Kahraman Sakul, M.A Washington, DC November, 18, 2009 Copyright 2009 by Kahraman Sakul All Rights Reserved ii AN OTTOMAN GLOBAL MOMENT: WAR OF SECOND COALITION IN THE LEVANT Kahraman Sakul, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: Gabor Agoston, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation aims to place the Ottoman Empire within its proper context in the Napoleonic Age and calls for a recognition of the crucial role of the Sublime Porte in the War of Second Coalition (1798-1802). The Ottoman-Russian joint naval expedition (1798-1800) to the Ionian Islands under the French occupation provides the framework for an examination of the Ottoman willingness to join the European system of alliance in the Napoleonic age which brought the victory against France in the Levant in the War of Second Coalition (1798-1802). Collections of the Ottoman Archives and Topkapı Palace Archives in Istanbul as well as various chronicles and treatises in Turkish supply most of the primary sources for this dissertation. Appendices, charts and maps are provided to make the findings on the expedition, finance and logistics more readable. The body of the dissertation is divided into nine chapters discussing in order the global setting and domestic situation prior to the forming of the second coalition, the Adriatic expedition, its financial and logistical aspects with the ensuing socio-economic problems in the Morea, the Sublime Porte’s relations with its protectorate – The Republic of Seven United Islands, and finally the post-war diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ulema, Waqf, and Ottoman State (1789-1839)
    ELITE CONFIGURATIONS AND CLUSTERS OF POWER: THE ULEMA, WAQF, AND OTTOMAN STATE (1789-1839) by Selim Argun Institute of Islamic Studies McGill University, Montréal January, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, McGill University, Montréal in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Selim Argun 2013 wāw), the twenty-seventh letter of the Arabic alphabet is considered to have) ﻭ mystical qualities. A saintly saying warns the faithful against words that begin with this letter by drawing attention to the sense of heavy responsibility and perils of accountability attached to their meanings. For example, waqf (religious endowment), waṣāyah (will/trusteeship), wirāthah (inheritance), wakālah (legal representation), wadīah (entrustment), wizārah (ministry), are words one must approach with utmost care when using them in his/her daily life. It is even recommended that one should refrain from seeking a career in these professions. There is, however, even more to say about the mystery of the wāw. 1 According to the discipline of ebced,0F the numerical value of this letter is 6 and the pair of two wāws (66) are equal to the words Allah and Lale (tulip) in its arithmetical sense. This is why the two figures are often mixed in Ottoman architectural designs and decorative ornamentations. Moreover, the purpose of the two facing wāws engraved above the shortened door of imperial loges of 1 The first of several mnemonic formulas designed to help one learn the numerical values assigned to the letters of the Arabic alphabet. ii Ottoman mosques where the powerful Sultans performed their prayers in seclusion, called hünkâr mahfili, was to remind them greatness of the Almighty while they were forced to enter in a bowed position.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomacy Might Be As Old As Politics Which Is As Old As State and People and As Long As the Debate of “We” and “Them” Existed, the Concept Is Likely to Prolong
    UNDERSTANDING THE REFORM PROCESS OF THE OTTOMAN DIPLOMACY: A CASE OF MODERNIZATION? A THESIS SUBMITTED TO GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY CEM ERÜLKER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EUROPEAN STUDIES DECEMBER 2015 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science Asst. Prof. Dr Galip Yalman Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science/ Asst. Prof. Dr Sevilay Kahraman Supervisor Examining Committee Members Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mustafa S. Palabıyık (TOBB ETU/IR) Doç. Dr. Sevilay Kahraman (METU/IR) Doç. Dr. Galip Yalman (METU/ADM) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Cem Erülker Signature : iii ABSTRACT UNDERSTANDING THE REFORM PROCESS OF THE OTTOMAN DIPLOMACY : A CASE OF MODERNIZATION? Erülker, Cem MS., Department of European Studies Supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sevilay Kahraman December 2015, 97 pages The reasons that forced the Ottoman Empire to change its conventional method of diplomacy starting from late 18th century will be examined in this Thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Warrior Traditions: How the Janissaries and Samurai
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 55 Article 6 Number 55 Fall 2006 10-1-2006 Comparing Warrior Traditions: How the Janissaries and Samurai Maintained Their tS atus and Privileges During Centuries of Peace Oleg Benesch University of British Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Recommended Citation Benesch, Oleg (2006) "Comparing Warrior Traditions: How the Janissaries and Samurai Maintained Their tS atus and Privileges During Centuries of Peace," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 55 : No. 55 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol55/iss55/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Benesch: Comparing Warrior Traditions: How the Janissaries and Samurai Mai Oleg Benesch 37 COMPARING WARRIOR TRADITIONS: HOW THE JANISSARIES AND SAMURAI MAINTAINED THEIR STATUS AND PRIVILEGES DURING CENTURIES OF PEACE OLEG BENESCH UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA [email protected] History has witnessed the rise and fall of countless warrior classes, all of which were the tools of rulers, and many of which grew strong enough to usurp power and become rulers themselves. The existence of warrior classes in such a great variety of cultures and eras seems to indi- cate a universal human disposition for entrusting a certain group with the most dangerous and undesirable task of conducting warfare. In some cases, such as that of the samurai, the warriors came from within the society itself, and in others, including those of the Mamluks, Cossacks, and janissaries, members of certain ethnic or religious groups were compelled to serve as professional fighters.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebellion, Janissaries and Religion in Sultanic Legitimisation in the Ottoman Empire
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Istanbul Bilgi University Library Open Access “THE FURIOUS DOGS OF HELL”: REBELLION, JANISSARIES AND RELIGION IN SULTANIC LEGITIMISATION IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE UMUT DENİZ KIRCA 107671006 İSTANBUL BİLGİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH YÜKSEK LİSANS PROGRAMI PROF. DR. SURAIYA FAROQHI 2010 “The Furious Dogs of Hell”: Rebellion, Janissaries and Religion in Sultanic Legitimisation in the Ottoman Empire Umut Deniz Kırca 107671006 Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi Yard. Doç Dr. M. Erdem Kabadayı Yard. Doç Dr. Meltem Toksöz Tezin Onaylandığı Tarih : 20.09.2010 Toplam Sayfa Sayısı: 139 Anahtar Kelimeler (Türkçe) Anahtar Kelimeler (İngilizce) 1) İsyan 1) Rebellion 2) Meşruiyet 2) Legitimisation 3) Yeniçeriler 3) The Janissaries 4) Din 4) Religion 5) Güç Mücadelesi 5) Power Struggle Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü’nde Tarih Yüksek Lisans derecesi için Umut Deniz Kırca tarafından Mayıs 2010’da teslim edilen tezin özeti. Başlık: “Cehennemin Azgın Köpekleri”: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda İsyan, Yeniçeriler, Din ve Meşruiyet Bu çalışma, on sekizinci yüzyıldan ocağın kaldırılmasına kadar uzanan sürede patlak veren yeniçeri isyanlarının teknik aşamalarını irdelemektedir. Ayrıca, isyancılarla saray arasındaki meşruiyet mücadelesi, çalışmamızın bir diğer konu başlığıdır. Başkentte patlak veren dört büyük isyan bir arada değerlendirilerek, Osmanlı isyanlarının karakteristik özelliklerine ve isyanlarda izlenilen meşruiyet pratiklerine ışık tutulması hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmamızda kullandığımız metot dâhilinde, 1703, 1730, 1807 ve 1826 isyanlarını konu alan yazma eserler karşılaştırılmış, müelliflerin, eserlerini oluşturdukları süreçteki niyetleri ve getirmiş oldukları yorumlara odaklanılmıştır. Argümanların devamlılığını gözlemlemek için, 1703 ve 1730 isyanları ile 1807 ve 1826 isyanları iki ayrı grupta incelenmiştir. 1703 ve 1730 isyanlarının ortak noktası, isyancıların kendi çıkarları doğrultusunda padişaha yakın olan ve rakiplerini bu sayede eleyen politik kişilikleri hedef almalarıdır.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MODERNIZATION of the OTTOMAN NAVY DURING the REIGN of SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) By
    THE MODERNIZATION OF THE OTTOMAN NAVY DURING THE REIGN OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) by DİLARA DAL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham April, 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The main focus of this study is to examine the modernization of the Ottoman navy during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz, exploring naval administration, education, and technology. Giving a summary of the transformation of shipbuilding technologies and bureaucratic institutions of the Ottoman naval forces between 1808 and 1861, it analyses the structure of the Ottoman navy, its level of development in comparison to previous periods of time, and the condition of the vessels making up the naval fleet from 1861 to 1876. It also intends to evaluate the character of existing administrative structures at the outset of Abdülaziz’s reign in 1861 and the nature of subsequent changes, including structural reorganization of the Imperial Naval Arsenal, the Ministry of Marine, and the Naval Academy, as well as advancements in military training and seafaring; all within the context of the impact of these changes on the military, political, and economic condition of the Empire during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz.
    [Show full text]