Permanent Alliance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Permanent Alliance Permanent Alliance: A Case Study on the Impact of US-Israeli Relations on US-Iranian Relations By Katharine Chance Senior Honors Thesis Submitted to the Department of Political Science University of California, San Diego 2019-2020 Abstract This thesis analyzes the development of a permanent alliance and its impact on other relationships in the system. Though an alliance serves to balance against a mutual security threat, the maintenance of an alliance has the potential to destabilize the system. The long-term commitment and continued joint strategic interests of two states will evolve into a permanent alliance. Despite the perceived benefits of the alliance, the smaller state will continuously entangle the dominant state in heightened levels of commitment against its own regional security threats until those threats become permanent adversaries of the dominant state. This paper illustrates these developments through U.S-Israeli relations and its impact on U.S.-Iranians relations. This case can be expanded to other permanent alliances in the Middle East and beyond to better understand potential obstacles to regional stability. 2 Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………...…….....2 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………..4 2 Theory…………………………………………………………………….……...7 2.1 Balance of Power………………………………………...…....………………..7 2.2 Defining an Alliance……………………………………………..……………..8 2.3 Failure of the Balance of Power…………………………………...…...……..11 2.4 Commitments in an Alliance…………………………………………………..15 2.5 Heightened Commitment and Small State Influence……………………...…..17 2.6 Perpetual Commitment Against an Ally’s Adversary…………………..……..22 2.7. Permanent Adversary from a Permanent Alliance…………………..……….24 3 Middle Eastern System………………………………………………………..27 3.1 Defining the Middle Eastern System…………………………………..….…..27 3.2 Background on the Middle Eastern System………………………..………….29 4 U.S. Foreign Policy…………………………………………………………….38 5 The United States and Israel…………………………………………………..61 5.1 Alliance Formation ……………………………………………………61 5.2. Commitments to the Alliance…………………………………………..63 5.3 Heightened Commitment and Small State Influence…………………...71 5.4 The Rebalance and Increased Small State Influence………………..…76 5.5 High Small State Influence and Firming against Iran………………....88 5.6 The Possible Change under Obama……………………………………96 5.7 Solidified Adversary under Trump …………………………………… 98 6 The United States and Iran………………………………..…………………101 6.1 Iranian Relations………………………………………...……………101 6.2 Background on Iran………………………………………..…………102 6.3 Alliance Formation and Commitment……………………………...…105 6.4 The Iranian Revolution…………………………………..……………113 6.5 Attempts to Restore Relations…………………………..….…………117 6.6 Uncertainty and Increasing Threat to Israel………………………….125 6.7 Permanent Adversary…………………………………………………127 7 Conclusion……………………………………………………………….……137 9.1 Future Study………………………………………………..…………137 9.2 Implications…………………………………………..………..…...…138 Bibliography……………………………………………………………….……140 3 1 Introduction The United States prided itself on “friendship with all nations—entangling alliances with none.”1 In line with Washington’s Farewell Address of 1796, U.S. policymakers sought to “steer clear of permanent alliance, with any part of the world.”2 In this warning to future policymakers, he did not disavow the formation of alliances, but rather expressed a hesitation towards any long- standing ties to any particular nation. Through long-standing ties, a nation was prevented from being truly free and was, “in some degree a slave.” Looking back at the last two centuries of U.S. foreign policy, has the U.S. steered clear of permanent alliances? As the U.S. sought a greater role in the international system, alliances produced influence over smaller states and cooperation among great powers. Through a growing system of alliances, the U.S. expanded its economic capabilities and produced stability within its sphere of influence. Out of two World Wars and into the Cold War, the U.S. dove into strategic alliances throughout the developing world and tightened its existing partnerships. In a competition for alliances, the U.S. committed to protect the interests of smaller states in an effort to combat the Soviet threat. As the Soviet Union diminished, new threats emerged that threatened the United States’ system of alliances. In the Middle East, the United States committed to a War on Terror and deepened its commitments to its regional allies. Today, the United States maintains alliances throughout the world. These alliances are permanent as long as the interests remain the same. 1 Jefferson, Thomas. “First Inaugural Address, Vol. 33: 17 February to 30 April 1801.” The Papers of Thomas Jefferson Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pub. 2006. P. 148-152. 2 Hamilton, Alexander. “Draft Fragment of George Washington’s Farewell Address, c. August 1796.” Manuscripts and Archives Division, The New York Public Library. Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations. 4 This thesis seeks to analyze the development of permanent alliances. Alliances form to balance power in system.3 Though the balance of power produces stability in the system, the maintenance of alliances causes the balance of power to fail.4 Dominant states in the system will commit to smaller states in the system to preserve the alliances.5 This commitment comes in the form of a “payoff” through an assessment of joint strategic interests. The long-term commitment will continue as long as the joint strategic interests remain.6 This evolves the alliance into a “permanent” alliance.7 Permanent alliances will impact other states in the system. The smaller state will leverage the dominant state to heighten its commitment.8 Perceiving high benefits from the alliance, the dominant state becomes entangled in backing up the small state in its foreign policy objectives. The dominant state will commit against other states in the system that are security threats to the smaller state.9 The perpetual commitment against the other state produces permanent adversaries in the system. The state will remain a permanent adversary as long as it is identified as a security threat to the smaller state and as long as the permanent alliance remains. 3 Levy, Jack S. “Balances and Balancing: Concepts, Propositions and Research Design.” Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate. Eds. John A. Vasquez and Colin Elman. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pub. 2003; Dingman, Roger V. “Theories of, and Approaches to, Alliance Politics.” Diplomacy: New Approaches in Theory, History, and Policy. New York. Pub. 1979; Modelski, George. “The Study of Alliances: A Review.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 7, no. 4. Pub. 1963; Friedman, Julian R. Alliance in International Politics. Boston. Pub. 1970; Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics Among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Pub. 1948; Morgenthau, Hans J. “Alliances in Theory and Practice.” Alliance Policy in the Cold War. Baltimore, MD. Pub. 1959; Gulick, Edward V. Europe’s Classical Balance of Power. New York: Norton. Pub. 1955; Kaplan, Morton A. Systems and Process in International Politics. New York: John Wiley. Pub. 1957. 4 Snyder, Glenn H. “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics.” World Politics. Vol. 36, no. 4. Pub. 1984. P 467- 468. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/2010183. 5 Gaddis, John Lewis. “The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System.” International Security, vol. 10, no. 4. Pub. 1986. P 132. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/2538951. 6 Snyder, Glenn H. “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics.” World Politics. Vol. 36, no. 4. Pub. 1984. P 463. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/2010183. 7 The term “permanent alliance” will be defined in the Theory section. 8 Walt, Stephen M. The Origins of Alliance. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press. Pub. 1987. P. 272. 9 Snyder, Glenn H. “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics.” World Politics. Vol. 36, no. 4. Pub. 1984. P 467. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/2010183. 5 This development is illustrated through the case of the United States relationship with Israel. By analyzing U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, this paper draws out U.S. objectives and interests in the region. This is followed by an analysis of U.S.-Israeli relations to examine the development of the permanent alliance and the increase in small state influence. To draw on the impact of the permanent alliance on other relationship in the system, this study analyzes the U.S-Iranian relationship from under the Shah until today. Embedded in both studies of U.S. relations is the relationship between Israel and Iran. As the Iranian regime became more hostile towards Israel and other regional allies, the U.S. stepped down attempts to normalize relations. By examining the change in relations, this thesis aims to demonstrate the impact of the U.S.- Israeli alliance on U.S.-Iranian relations. 6 2 Theory 2.1 Balance of Power Alliance literature derives from the foundational assumption that “alliances are created to provide security against threats.”10 Implicit to the assumption is that alliances are created to balance power in a system. Morgenthau argues that alliances are “a necessary function of the balance of power operating in a multiple state system.”11 Guided by this framework, scholars analyze alliances within the context of the balance of power theory.12 The balance of power is the “actual state of affairs in which power is distributed among several nations with approximate equality.” 13 At the center of this theory is the idea that “power alone can limit power.”14 This “balance” forms from
Recommended publications
  • International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War
    Mercer Law Review Volume 43 Number 2 Lead Articles I - The Legal Article 1 Implications of a Nation at War 3-1992 International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War Francis A. Boyle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Boyle, Francis A. (1992) "International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran- Iraq War," Mercer Law Review: Vol. 43 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol43/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mercer Law Review by an authorized editor of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEAD ARTICLES International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War by Francis A. Boyle* Prescript This Article was written in 1986 and submitted to the University of New Orleans Symposium on Neutrality. The Article reflects the author's analysis regarding the United States military intervensionism into the Middle East with a special focus on the Persian Gulf region. The author analyzes the United States' policies to divide-and-conquer the Arab oil * Professor of International Law, University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illi- nois. University of Chicago (A.B., 1971); Harvard Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 1976); Harvard University (A.M., 1978 and Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Soore Mehr Publishing Co
    Soore Mehr Publishing Co. Visit us Hall5.0/B132 16-20 Oct 2019 Soore Mehr Publishing Co. is one of the Best and huge Publishing group in Iran, and established 1998, we selected 7 years as the best Publisher in Iran and get the prize with cultural ministry Of Iran. we published about 10000 title books up to now, and we publish about 300 new title( 1st edition) every year, we have fiction, Non-fiction, Poem, War story and Memory for Adults. In addition we have a special Department for Children›s and Young Adults that name is «Mehrak Publication», and we have about 1000 books for children›s and young Adult it›s included Poem, Story, comic story, poem story. we register Mehrak publication Brand last year. Mehrak Puplication Children's Department www.mehrak.ir Title: The Twenty-three Ones Author: Ahmad Yousefzadeh Subject: Non-Fiction (Memory) Year of Publishing: 2017 / 58th Edition No. of Pages: 408/Paperback Size: 14 × 21 ISBN: 9786001755842 Awards: The book was honored by the supreme leader of Iran. about book The age of Ahmad (the author of the book) is sixteen. His name, after military training, is finally listed on the list of expeditions to the warfront. He participates in Operation Baytol-Moghaddass . But after a while, he has taken as a prisoner of war. There, during his captivity in the Iraqi POW camp, he is called a «minor child» due to his young age and his small body. He is being taken to the city of Basra along with 150 other prisoners of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of Inherited War Ree American Presidents in Vietnam
    THE 13 DREW PER PA S Images of Inherited War ree American Presidents in Vietnam William R. Hersch Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Air University David S. Fadok, Lieutenant General, Commander and President School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Jeffrey J. Smith, Colonel, PhD, Commandant and Dean AIR UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ADVANCED AIR AND SPACE STUDIES Images of Inherited War Three American Presidents in Vietnam William R. Hersch Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Drew Paper No. 13 Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jeanne K. Shamburger Hersch, William R., 1972– Cover Art, Book Design, and Illustrations Images of inherited war : three American presidents in Vietnam Daniel Armstrong / William R. Hersch, Lt. Colonel, USAF. Composition and Prepress Production pages cm. — (Drew paper, ISSN 1941-3785 ; no. 13) Nedra Looney Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-58566-249-4 Print Preparation and Distribution 1. Vietnam War, 1961–1975—Public opinion. 2. Vietnam War, Diane Clark 1961–1975—United States. 3. Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917–1963—Public opinion. 4. Johnson, Lyndon B. (Lyndon Baines), 1908–1973—Public opinion. 5. Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 1913–1994—Public opinion. 6. Political AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE culture—United States—History—20th century. 7. Public opinion—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS DS559.62.U6H46 2014 959.704’31–dc23 2014034552 Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Published by Air University Press in February 2014 Managing Editor Demorah Hayes Design and Production Manager Cheryl King Air University Press 155 N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Tribalism and Sectarianism in Defining the Iraqi National Identity
    The Role of Tribalism and Sectarianism in Defining the Iraqi National Identity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Abdallat, Saleh Ayman. 2020. The Role of Tribalism and Sectarianism in Defining the Iraqi National Identity. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365053 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Role of Tribalism and Sectarianism in Defining the Iraqi National Identity Saleh Ayman Abdallat A Thesis in the Field of Middle Eastern Studies for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University May 2020 Copyright 2020 Saleh Ayman Abdallat Abstract In this thesis, I examine the roots that aggravated the Iraqi national identity to devolve into sectarianism. The thesis covers 603 years of historical events that coincided during the time the Ottoman ruled Mesopotamia, until the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003. The thesis is divided into four chapters, in which I address the factors that aggravated to deteriorate the Iraqi national unity. The historical events include the Ottoman-Persian rivalry that lasted for more than three centuries, and the outcomes that precipitated the Iraqi national identity to devolve into sectarianism. Furthermore, the thesis covers the modern history of Iraq during the period that Britain invaded Iraq and appointed the Hashemite to act on their behalf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Artesh: Iran's Marginalized Regular Military
    The Artesh: Iran’s Marginalized Regular Military Middle East Institute Viewpoints November 2011 © Middle East Institute 2011. All rights reserved. Distribution of this work is per- mitted for non-commercial use, unmodified, with attribution to the Middle East Institute. The Middle East Institute does not take positions on Middle East policy; the views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its employees, or its trustees. Cover photos, from left to right: Wikimedia user Ebrahim-jamal, Wikimedia user Jilas.wox, US Government For more publications from the Middle East Institute: http://mei.edu/Publica- tions/WebPublications.aspx The Middle East Institute 1761 N St. NW Washington, DC 20036 Tel: 202-785-1141 Fax: 202-881-8861 www.mei.edu Middle East Institute Viewpoints: The Artesh • www.mei.edu 2 Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowl- edge of the Middle East in America and strengthen understand- ing of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Mid- dle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It provides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in coun- tries throughout the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Artesh: Iran's Marginalized Regular Military
    The Artesh: Iran’s Marginalized Regular Military Middle East Institute Viewpoints November 2011 © Middle East Institute 2011. All rights reserved. Distribution of this work is per- mitted for non-commercial use, unmodified, with attribution to the Middle East Institute. The Middle East Institute does not take positions on Middle East policy; the views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its employees, or its trustees. Cover photos, from left to right: Wikimedia user Ebrahim-jamal, Wikimedia user Jilas.wox, US Government For more publications from the Middle East Institute: http://mei.edu/Publica- tions/WebPublications.aspx The Middle East Institute 1761 N St. NW Washington, DC 20036 Tel: 202-785-1141 Fax: 202-881-8861 www.mei.edu Middle East Institute Viewpoints: The Artesh • www.mei.edu 2 Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowl- edge of the Middle East in America and strengthen understand- ing of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Mid- dle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It provides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in coun- tries throughout the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Commitment Without Control: the Burdensharing Dilemma in the US-Japan Alliance
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 4-2014 Commitment without Control: The Burdensharing Dilemma in the US-Japan Alliance Jake A. Douglas College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the American Politics Commons, Asian Studies Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Douglas, Jake A., "Commitment without Control: The Burdensharing Dilemma in the US-Japan Alliance" (2014). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 28. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/28 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Commitment without Control: The Burdensharing Dilemma in the US-Japan Alliance A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Government from The College of William and Mary by Jake Arthur Douglas Accepted for _____________________________ (Honors) ___________________________________ Tun-Jen Cheng, Director ___________________________________ Sophia Hart ___________________________________ Hiroshi Kitamura Williamsburg, Va April 11, 2014 Douglas 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Iran Policy the Saudi-American Rift Christopher Parmly Florida International University, [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-13-2015 The Role of Iran Policy the Saudi-American Rift Christopher Parmly Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC000198 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Parmly, Christopher, "The Role of Iran Policy the Saudi-American Rift" (2015). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2301. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/2301 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida THE ROLE OF IRAN POLICY IN THE SAUDI-AMERICAN RIFT. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in INTERNATIONAL STUDIES by Christopher Parmly 2015 To: Dean John Stack Green School of International and Public Affairs This thesis, written by Christopher Parmly, and entitled The Role of Iran Policy in the Saudi-American Rift, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Naisy Sarduy _______________________________________ Iqbal Akhtar _______________________________________ Felix Martin, Major Professor Date of Defense: November 13, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Gulf War and the Army's Future
    THE LAND WARFARE PAPERS No . 27 OCTOBER 1997 The First Gulf War and the Army's Future Brian J. Dunn A National Security Affairs Paper Published on Occasion by THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY Arlington. Virginia The First Gulf War and the Army's Future by Brian J. Dunn The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN AUSA INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of the editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a patticular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Atmy agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concemed about imp01tant defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. 27, OCTOBER 1997 The First Gulf War and the Army's Future by Brian J. Dunn Brian J. Dunn eamed a bachelor's degree in political science and history from the University of Michigan and a master's degree in history from Eastem Michigan University. For six years he served in the Michigan Atmy National Guard as a radio operator in the 1561h Signal Battalion, which was tasked to supp01t VII Corps in Getmany.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Iran-Iraq War on Iranian Children
    Impact of Iran-Iraq War on Iranian Children Nasrin Mosaffa* Professor of International Relations, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Received: 2018/07/06 Accepted: 2018/08/25 Abstract The devastating Iran - Iraq war was the longest war of the 20 century, that also affected Iranian children from Sep 1980 to August 1988, suffering immediate or subsequent physical, mental, sociological and economic impacts. The focus of this paper is children’s victimisation as there are thousands of them killed, injured, captured as prisoners of war, acts that all are now categorised as grave violations of children rights during armed conflicts by the UN. To highlight the extent of these violations and their con-sequences, this study investigate ‘war of cities’ with missile attacks on Iranian cities, schools and hospital. Despite existence legal framework for protection the children in International Humanitarian Law and other documents, United Nations failed to positive action to protect them even as a moral imperative. Study will also recount stories of children affected by chemical weapons and remaining mines in western Iran, that still killing them. Keywords: Children, Iran, Iraq, Iran-Iraq War Introduction Thirty years after a devastating eight-year war between Iran and Iraq, various attempts have been made to study its effects on the Middle East * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] … Impact of Iran-Iraq War ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ Nasrin Mosaffa and the Persian Gulf region, and on broader themes of international relations and security.1 The emphasis of focusing on the political and military elements of the war is justified by its nature and consequences; however, a socio-legal and political analysis of how civilians, especially children, were affected by this war, in both the short and long term, is missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Attacking Iran: Lessons from the Iran-Iraq War
    The Dubai Initiative Policy Brief Attacking Iran: Lessons from the Iran-Iraq War Annie Tracy Samuel AttackIng IrAn: LeSSonS from The IrAn-IrAq WAr Dubai Initiative – Policy Brief Annie Tracy Samuel The Dubai Initiative December 2011 2 | DuBaI InITIaTIve – PolIcy BrIef This policy brief seeks to contribute to and inform the debate concerning a possible attack by the united States and/or Israel on Iranian nuclear and military facil- ities. The presumed aim of such an attack would be to weaken the Islamic republic, particularly by hindering its ability to build a nuclear weapon. However, the history of the Iraqi invasion of Iran in September 1980 calls into question the contention that an attack will weaken the regime in Tehran. This policy brief examines Iran’s reactions to the Iraqi invasion in order to shed light on Iran’s possible reactions to au .S. or Israeli attack. It will assess how the Iranian people responded to the invasion and its effects on Iranian politics and the position of the new regime. It will also explore the nature of the policies adopted by the Islamic republic in waging the Iran-Iraq War that carried on for eight years after the Iraqi invasion. The subjects addressed in this policy brief are only a small part of the factors that must be addressed when considering a policy towards Iran that includes a military option. The ramifications of such an attack will be immense and unpredictable. It is therefore critical that we examine Iranian responses to the Iraqi invasion in order to draw whatever lessons we can and to understand the implications of a future attack.
    [Show full text]
  • An Iraqi Military Perspective of the Iran-Iraq
    Kevin M. Woods, Williamson Murray, and Thomas Holaday with Mounir Elkhamri INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON, D.C. 2009 The opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any other agency of the Federal Government. This pub- lication is cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Except for the maps on pages 47, 51, 52, and 68, portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included. NDU Press would appreciate a courtesy copy of reprints or reviews. This work was conducted under contract DASW01-04-C-003, Task ET-8-2579 for the National Intelligence Council. The publication of this IDA document does not in- dicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official position of the Agency. © 2007, 2008 Institute for Defense Analyses, 4850 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1882 • (703) 845-2000. This material may be reproduced by or for the U.S. Government pursuant to the copyright license under the clause at DFARS 252.227-7013 (Nov 95). First printing, March 2009 ISSN 1071–7552 NDU Press publications are sold by the U.S. Government Printing Office. For ordering information, call (202) 512-1800 or write to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. For the U.S. Government On-line Bookstore, go to: <http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/sale.html>.
    [Show full text]