DOCSLIB.ORG

Irans Relations with China and the West Cooperation And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Irans Relations with China and the West Cooperation And Iran’s Relations with China and the West Cooperation and Confrontation in Asia Willem van Kemenade November 2009 NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ‘CLINGENDAEL’ CIP-Data Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague Van Kemenade, Willem: Cooperation and Confrontation in Asia: Iran’s Relations with China and the West The Hague, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ Clingendael Diplomacy Papers No. 24 ISBN: 978-90-5031-1472 Desktop publishing by Ragnhild Drange Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ Clingendael Diplomatic Studies Programme Clingendael 7 2597 VH The Hague Telephone +31(0)70 - 3746628 Telefax +31(0)70 - 3746666 P.O. Box 93080 2509 AB The Hague Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.clingendael.nl The Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ is an independent institute for research, training and public information on international affairs. It publishes the results of its own research projects and the monthly Internationale Spectator and offers a broad range of courses and conferences covering a wide variety of international issues. It also maintains a library and documentation centre. © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright-holders. Clingendael Institute, P.O. Box 93080, 2509 AB The Hague, The Netherlands. Contents Preface 3 1 The Historical and Geo-strategic Setting From the “Old Silk Road” to the New ‘Energy’ Silk Road 7 2 Iran’s Contemporary Relations with the West The Failure of Westernization in the Shah’s Iran 17 3 Iran’s Contemporary Relations with China Cooperative Opposition against US Hegemony but no Alliance 41 4 “Nuclear Brinkmanship” China and the EU-US led Confrontation over Iran’s Nuclear Programme 59 5 The China-Iran Economic Relationship Linking East and West Asia through “Pipelineistan” 105 6 Epilogue 123 Bibliography 127 Appendix: Map of Iran 131 1 2 Preface: The project to study China-Iran relations was conceived immediately after the publication of my “Détente Between China and India: The Delicate Balance of Geopolitics in Asia (Clingendael Diplomacy Papers No. 16) in the autumn of 2008. Based on the triple rationale of containing India, serving as a comrade-in- arms in the struggle against Islamic extremism and a backdoor to the Indian Ocean and the Middle East, Pakistan is the premier strategic ally of China in the world. But since Pakistan is also a ‘fragile’ state, Iran is a welcome additional major partner. Unlike Pakistan it is a natural, cohesive country, an energy superpower and a partner in resisting American domination, sanctions and pressure of which both China and Iran have long been targets. A second incentive to focus on Iran was/is that 2009 marks the 30th anniversary of severed diplomatic relations with the United States. China and the United States re-established diplomatic relations 30 years after the 1949 Chinese Communist revolution in 1979, the year that the Iranian Islamic revolution shook the world. The American rupture with Iran was triggered by the hostage taking of American diplomats by revolutionary thugs in 1979, sanctioned by Grand-Ayatollah Khomeini himself, and has lasted so long mainly because of the lopsided Israel- fixated ideology and diplomacy of successive American administrations. The American absence has paved the way for China to move into Iran in a big way, initially as a major arms supplier during the Iran-Iraq War, then as a supplier of 3 nuclear technology, then as a buyer of oil, then as an industrial power and builder of infrastructure, altogether making China the largest trading partner of Iran. As tensions between China and the United States escalated nearly out of control over China’s support for the Iranian nuclear programme, China made a grand bargain with the Clinton Administration in 1997, terminated this support and Russia took over as the major supplier of nuclear technology and raw materials. Since China’s modus operandi is not yet that of a high profile assertive superpower that takes the lead, Russia has evolved as the main political superpower-ally of Iran with China as a mostly discreet secondary player on the public diplomatic scene, although its role as an economic superpower player is of far more strategic significance. 1 The role of Russia in the long drawn-out multilateral powergame around Iran has been extensively covered but as the primary focus of this book is China-Iran relations, no separate chapter has been included on Russia-Iran relations. After the folly of the Bush years, reflexive, blind support for – almost -- anything Israel does, crippling sanctions against Iran, axis-of-evil rhetoric, threats of invasion, possibly with nuclear weapons, regime change etc., President Barack Obama wants to end three decades of ideo-psychological warfare against and the isolation of Iran, but while initial diplomatic steps were underway, the country plunged into turmoil over the disputed re-election of the hard-line confrontational President Mahmud Ahmadinejad. Mass protests, followed by violent repression, show trials of opposition leaders by kangaroo courts, etc. have complicated the Obama initiative, at least temporarily. As part of my project, I had planned a research visit to Tehran, but it took me three months of applications, for different types of visas on each occasion, before I could pack my bags. I arrived in Tehran late in the evening, two days before the June election with Tehran’s urban motorway system clogged with tens of thousands of young people, leaning out of their car windows, the men making V- signs, the women waving their headscarves in shows of defiance to indicate that the days of the strict Islamic dress code were numbered. They were all supporters of moderate presidential hopeful Mir-Hussein Mousavi, displaying a jubilance and euphoria as if the election had already been won. Then two days later came the great anti-climax, when the predetermined election results were announced: Ahmadinejad 63 per cent! Although it was not a Stalinist 90+ figure, for all the people I spoke to, it had zero credibility. 1) For China’s diplomatic strategy see: Willem van Kemenade, China’s Post-Olympic Rise and its place in the Global Concert of Nations, in: Challenges in a Changing World, Clingendael Views on Global and Regional Issues, The Hague, 2008, pp. 85-99. 4 I had not gone to Iran to observe the election, though, but to conduct research for a monograph on China-Iran relations through a series of interviews with Iranian China specialists, government officials, diplomats and Chinese academics working in Iran. For a start, the Netherlands Ambassador to Iran, Radinck van Vollenhoven, kindly hosted a lunch for me, attended by former senior officials of the pre-Ahmadinejad government of the reformist President Mohammed Khatami (1997-2005), diplomats and businessmen. The opposition movement against the election result had gained momentum in a few days and Tehran was in utter chaos. My host organization, assigned to me by the Iranian Embassy in Beijing, was the “Institute of Political and International Studies” (IPIS), which had gained notoriety by hosting the so-called “Holocaust Denial” conference in 2005 (see Chapter 3). I was to deliver a lecture there and they would make arrangements for me with other organizations, but nothing had happened and nobody could be reached. Within a week after the election, all visiting journalists were told to leave; they had come on one-week visas and no visas would be extended. As a visiting academic, I had a one-month visa but with all doors closed, it was meaningless. Chinese academics in Beijing had given me the names of their Iranian counterparts, but again: incommunicado. Some people had agreed to meet me, but then they did not show up and later explained that it was too dangerous on the streets, or that nobody wanted to be seen with a “Westerner” in a hotel or restaurant or that they needed special permission to meet with me which they could not get. It was like China in the 1970s.2 In the hope that the situation would calm down in a week or so, I spent my days surfing the heavily censored internet and cruising the streets of Tehran, watching the protests, but that was becoming increasingly risky indeed. Soon I realized that no effective research was possible and I decided to return to China, via Urumqi, the capital of the Far-Western Xinjiang region, which incidentally a few days after my stopover was in flames as well, as Muslim Uygurs had gone on the rampage against harsh repressive Han-Chinese rule. Back in Beijing, I had to satisfy myself with library and internet research. The main source for the narrative of the 1980s and 1990s is John Garver’s standard work on historical and contemporary relations between China and Iran,3 from which I have quoted extensively, but since this excellent book’s coverage of events does not extend beyond 2004-2005, my sources for the period 2005-2009 are a number of other more recent books, 2) On the 2008 Economist Intelligence Unit’s ‘Democracy Index’, out of 167 countries, China is ranked 136 and Iran 145, although Iran has a “multiparty system”. http://graphics.eiu.com/PDF/Democracy%20Index%202008.pdf 3) John W. Garver, China and Iran, Ancient Partners in a Post-Imperial World, University of Washington Press, 2006. 5 leading newspapers and journals of the world, such as The New York Times, The Financial Times, The Wall Street Journal, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Survival, Iranian Studies, etc. and numerous websites. I also had some valuable interviews with Chinese think-tank academics who do not want to be named because of the sensitivities in China-Iran relations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alexander Von Nordheim Mphil Thesis
    IRAN'S ISLAMIC REVOLUTION: THE ULAMA, THE WEST, NATIONALISM, AND THE GROWTH OF POLITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS Alexander von Nordheim A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of MPhil at the University of St. Andrews 2012 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3231 This item is protected by original copyright SUBMISSION OF PHD AND MPHIL THESES REQUIRED DECLARATIONS 1. Candidate's declarations: ...... , hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately ..... words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in [month, year] and as a candidate for the degree of ..... in [month, year]; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between [year] and [year]. (If you received assistance in writing from anyone other than your supervisor/s): I, ......, received assistance in the writing of this thesis in respect of [language, grammar, spelling or syntax], which was provided by ....... Date .......signature of candidate .......... 2. Supervisor's declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of ...........in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date .......signature of supervisor ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Unwavering Israel-Hatred
    Iran’s Unwavering Israel-Hatred Dr. Doron Itzchakov BESA Center Perspectives No. 1,104, March 6, 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Four decades ago, the revolutionary movement led by Ayatollah Khomeini overthrew the Pahlavi dynasty and established the Islamic Republic of Iran on its ruins. Since then, significant changes have taken place in the discourse and concepts of its leaders. However, the Iranian political establishment has never wavered in its relentless hostility towards Israel. Once a friend to Israel, Tehran overnight became an archenemy dedicated to its destruction. Iran’s overnight shift from Israel’s friend to its archenemy was a strange and shocking turn of events. The two countries do not share a common border, and there is no conflict between them regarding the presence of an ethnic or religious minority – including the Jewish community living in Iran. So what was the source of such virulent and apparently indestructible hostility? To answer this question, it is helpful to examine the pattern of bilateral relations that developed between the countries not long after the establishment of the State of Israel. Bilateral relations between monarchist Iran and Israel began to warm gradually upon Iran's de facto recognition of Israel in March 1950. Iran was the second Muslim country after Turkey to recognize Israel and even opened consular representation in Jerusalem. The relationship was established during a period of global and regional change that influenced Tehran's geopolitical status, both as a buffer between East and West and within the Muslim world. Iran had to position itself in the new international order. It was a Shiite monarchy in the heart of a volatile Sunni region that was being shaken by new waves of Arab nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • English-126.Pdf
    2019 / 1398 ، بهار 126 ی شماره « آورد ره » ی فصلنامه 1 Page RAHAVARD Quarterly Persian & English Journal of Iranian Studies Issue 126, Spring 1398 / 2019 GOAL: Is to empowere our young generation with the richness of our Persian heritage, keep them informed of the history of the extraordinary people to whom they belong as they gain mighty wisdom from a western system that embraces them in the aftermath of the revolution and infuse them with the knowledge and ideals that inspire them. FINANCIAL: RAHAVARD is entirely supported by, Supscription dues, advertisers and RAHAVARD: contributions from its readers, and followers A Los Angeles-based Quarterly Bilingual who largely constitute the elite of the Iranians Journalof Iranian Studies, was founded by living in diaspora. HASSAN SHAHBAZ in 1981 in Los Angeles. DIGITAL RAHAVARD (ebook): In 2012 with the Rahavard, publishes scholarly articles in the encouragement & constant reminder of HOMA field of: Persian (Iranian) Studies (Literature, SARSHAR and Dr. FIROUZ NADERI RAHAVARD History, Politics, Culture, Society and beyond). English and Persian digital (ebook) was Its readers are well educated, well informed, launched as an online version of the publication business owners, scholars, intellectuals, at: www.rahavard.com. Since then it's appeal professors, politicians & philanthropists. has increased drastically, specifically by younger It's founder HASSAN SHAHBAZ passed away in generation and Iranians living in Iran. May 2006. Forming an Advisory Committee, ENGLISH RAHAVARD: In 2016 with the his widow Sholeh Shams Shahbaz has encouragements of H.E. ARDESHIR ZAHEDI, Dr. continued publishing. FIROUZ NADERI & the assistance of Dr. JANET Today, Rahavard has grown both in volume, AFARY, Cal State Santa Barbara (by providing subscription, and influence.
    [Show full text]
  • C01384460 Approved for Release: 2014/02/26
    C01384460 Approved for Release: 2014/02/26 APPLIND1X A . ;hose Dil? An Abbreviated History of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Dispute,-'194; -53 In 1372, the then Shah of Persia, rlaser ad-Din, in return for much needed cash, gave to Baron Paul Julius de Reuter. .'a concession to. exploit all his country's minerals (except for gold, silver, and precious stones'), all its forests and uncultivated land, and ail canals and irrigation works, as ;sell as a monopoly to construct railways and tranilways. Although the resulting uproar,-zsrac:.a11~ from neighboring Russiaraused this sweeping concession to be cancelled, de Reuter, who was a German Jew with British citizenship, persisted and by 1889 regained two parts of his original concession--the operation of a bank and the working of Persia's mines. Under the latter grant, de Reuter's men explored-for oil without great success, and the concession expired in 1999, 'the year the Baron died.` Persian oil right Shen passed to a British speculator, William Knox D'Arcy, whose first fortune had been made in Australian gold mines: The purchase price of the concession was about 50,000 pounds, and in 1903 the enterprise began to sell shares in "The First Exploitation Company." Exploratory drilling proceeded, and by 1904, two producing wells were in. a,+A - Shortly thereafter,Ainterest in oil was sharply stimulated by the efforts of Admiral Sir John Fisher, First Lord of the Admiralty, to convert the Royal Navy.from'burning coal to oil.. As a result, the Burmah Oil Company sought to become involved in eersian oil and, joining with D "lrcy and Lord Strathcona, formed the new Concessions Syndicate, L d, which endured un'ti'l 1907 when Burmah Oil bought D'Arcy out for 200„000 pounds cash and 900,000 pounds in shares.
    [Show full text]
  • International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War
    Mercer Law Review Volume 43 Number 2 Lead Articles I - The Legal Article 1 Implications of a Nation at War 3-1992 International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War Francis A. Boyle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Boyle, Francis A. (1992) "International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran- Iraq War," Mercer Law Review: Vol. 43 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol43/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mercer Law Review by an authorized editor of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEAD ARTICLES International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War by Francis A. Boyle* Prescript This Article was written in 1986 and submitted to the University of New Orleans Symposium on Neutrality. The Article reflects the author's analysis regarding the United States military intervensionism into the Middle East with a special focus on the Persian Gulf region. The author analyzes the United States' policies to divide-and-conquer the Arab oil * Professor of International Law, University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illi- nois. University of Chicago (A.B., 1971); Harvard Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 1976); Harvard University (A.M., 1978 and Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Nuclear Ambitions From
    IDENTITY AND LEGITIMACY: IRAN’S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS FROM NON- TRADITIONAL PERSPECTIVES Pupak Mohebali Doctor of Philosophy University of York Politics June 2017 Abstract This thesis examines the impact of Iranian elites’ conceptions of national identity on decisions affecting Iran's nuclear programme and the P5+1 nuclear negotiations. “Why has the development of an indigenous nuclear fuel cycle been portrayed as a unifying symbol of national identity in Iran, especially since 2002 following the revelation of clandestine nuclear activities”? This is the key research question that explores the Iranian political elites’ perspectives on nuclear policy actions. My main empirical data is elite interviews. Another valuable source of empirical data is a discourse analysis of Iranian leaders’ statements on various aspects of the nuclear programme. The major focus of the thesis is how the discourses of Iranian national identity have been influential in nuclear decision-making among the national elites. In this thesis, I examine Iranian national identity components, including Persian nationalism, Shia Islamic identity, Islamic Revolutionary ideology, and modernity and technological advancement. Traditional rationalist IR approaches, such as realism fail to explain how effective national identity is in the context of foreign policy decision-making. I thus discuss the connection between national identity, prestige and bargaining leverage using a social constructivist approach. According to constructivism, states’ cultures and identities are not established realities, but the outcomes of historical and social processes. The Iranian nuclear programme has a symbolic nature that mingles with socially constructed values. There is the need to look at Iran’s nuclear intentions not necessarily through the lens of a nuclear weapons programme, but rather through the regime’s overall nuclear aspirations.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Statement
    Received bv NSD/FARA Registration Unit 12/30/2019 11:55:09 AM OMB NO. 1124-0002; Expires February 28, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Supplemental Statement Washington, dc 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended For Six Month Period Ending Nov 30, 2019 (Insert date) I - REGISTRANT 1. (a) Name of Registrant (b) Registration No. National Council of Resistance of iran-US Rep Offi 6171 (c) Business Address(es) of Registrant 1747 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 1125 Washington, DC 20006 2. Has there been a change in the information previously furnished in connection with the following? (a) If an individual: (1) Residence address(es) Yes □ No H (2) Citizenship Yes □ No 53 (3) Occupation Yes □ No IS (b) If an organization: (1) Name Yes □ No E3 (2) Ownership or control Yes □ No H (3) Branch offices Yes □ No ® (c) Explain fully all changes, if any, indicated in Items (a) and (b) above. IF THE REGISTRANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OMIT RESPONSE TO ITEMS 3,4, AND 5(a). 3. If you have previously filed Exhibit C1, state whether any changes therein have occurred during this 6 month reporting period. Yes □ No 0 If yes, have you filed an amendment to the Exhibit C? Yes □ No □ If no, please attach the required amendment. 1 The Exhibit C, for which no printed form is provided, consists of a true copy of the charter, articles of incorporation, association, and by laws of a registrant that is an organization. (A waiver of the requirement to file an Exhibit C may be obtained for good cause upon written application to the Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Education and Emigration: the Case of the Iranian-American Community
    Education and Emigration: The case of the Iranian-American community Sina M. Mossayeb Teachers College, Columbia University Roozbeh Shirazi Teachers College, Columbia University Abstract This paper explores the plausibility of a hypothesis that puts forth perceived educational opportunity as a significant pull factor influencing Iranians' decisions to immigrate to the United States. Drawing on various literatures, including research on educational policy in Iran, government policy papers, and figures from recent studies and census data, the authors establish a case for investigating the correlation between perceived educational opportunity (or lack thereof) and immigration. Empirical findings presented here from a preliminary survey of 101 Iranian-born individuals living in the U.S. suggest that such a correlation may indeed exist, thus providing compelling grounds for further research in this area. The paper expands on existing literature by extending prevailing accounts of unfavorable conditions in Iran as push factors for emigration, to include the draw of perceived educational opportunity, as a coexisting and influential pull factor for immigration to the U.S. Introduction Popular discourse about Iranian immigration to the United States focuses on the social and political freedoms associated with relocation. The prevailing literature on Iranian immigration explains why people leave Iran, but accounts remain limited to a unilateral force--namely, unfavorable conditions in Iran. Drawing on existing studies of Iranian educational policies and their consequences, we propose an extension to this thesis. We hypothesize that perceived educational opportunity is a significant attraction for Iranians in considering immigration to the U.S. To establish a foundation for our research, we provide a background on Iran's sociopolitical climate after the 1978/1979 revolution and examine salient literature on Iran's higher education policy.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Fileiranian Migrations to Dubai: Constraints and Autonomy of A
    Iranian Migrations to Dubai: Constraints and Autonomy of a Segmented Diaspora Amin Moghadam Working Paper No. 2021/3 January 2021 The Working Papers Series is produced jointly by the Ryerson Centre for Immigration and Settlement (RCIS) and the CERC in Migration and Integration www.ryerson.ca/rcis www.ryerson.ca/cerc-migration Working Paper No. 2021/3 Iranian Migrations to Dubai: Constraints and Autonomy of a Segmented Diaspora Amin Moghadam Ryerson University Series Editors: Anna Triandafyllidou and Usha George The Working Papers Series is produced jointly by the Ryerson Centre for Immigration and Settlement (RCIS) and the CERC in Migration and Integration at Ryerson University. Working Papers present scholarly research of all disciplines on issues related to immigration and settlement. The purpose is to stimulate discussion and collect feedback. The views expressed by the author(s) do not necessarily reflect those of the RCIS or the CERC. For further information, visit www.ryerson.ca/rcis and www.ryerson.ca/cerc-migration. ISSN: 1929-9915 Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License A. Moghadam Abstract In this paper I examine the way modalities of mobility and settlement contribute to the socio- economic stratification of the Iranian community in Dubai, while simultaneously reflecting its segmented nature, complex internal dynamics, and relationship to the environment in which it is formed. I will analyze Iranian migrants’ representations and their cultural initiatives to help elucidate the socio-economic hierarchies that result from differentiated access to distinct social spaces as well as the agency that migrants have over these hierarchies. In doing so, I examine how social categories constructed in the contexts of departure and arrival contribute to shaping migratory trajectories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Revolution, Past, Present and Future
    The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Dr. Zayar Copyright © Iran Chamber Society The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Content: Chapter 1 - The Historical Background Chapter 2 - Notes on the History of Iran Chapter 3 - The Communist Party of Iran Chapter 4 - The February Revolution of 1979 Chapter 5 - The Basis of Islamic Fundamentalism Chapter 6 - The Economics of Counter-revolution Chapter 7 - Iranian Perspectives Copyright © Iran Chamber Society 2 The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Chapter 1 The Historical Background Iran is one of the world’s oldest countries. Its history dates back almost 5000 years. It is situated at a strategic juncture in the Middle East region of South West Asia. Evidence of man’s presence as far back as the Lower Palaeolithic period on the Iranian plateau has been found in the Kerman Shah Valley. And time and again in the course of this long history, Iran has found itself invaded and occupied by foreign powers. Some reference to Iranian history is therefore indispensable for a proper understanding of its subsequent development. The first major civilisation in what is now Iran was that of the Elamites, who might have settled in South Western Iran as early as 3000 B.C. In 1500 B.C. Aryan tribes began migrating to Iran from the Volga River north of the Caspian Sea and from Central Asia. Eventually two major tribes of Aryans, the Persian and Medes, settled in Iran. One group settled in the North West and founded the kingdom of Media. The other group lived in South Iran in an area that the Greeks later called Persis—from which the name Persia is derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology and the Iranian Revolution1
    Ideology and the Iranian Revolution1 Mehdi Shadmehr2 First Draft: May 2008. This Draft: Summer 2011 Comments are welcomed. 1I wish to thank Bing Powell, Charles Ragin, Mehran Kamrava, Bonnie Meguid, Gretchen Helmeke, and participants in the Comparative Politics Workshop at the University of Rochester for helpful suggestions and comments. 2Department of Economics, University of Miami, Jenkins Bldg., Coral Gables, FL 33146. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Some theories of revolution deny an independent role for ideology in the making of rev- olutions, whereas others grant it an indispensable role. I investigate the role of ideology in the Iranian Revolution by focusing on two periods of Iranian history that witnessed popular uprising: the early 1960's and the late 1970's. While the former uprising was aborted, the latter led to the Iranian Revolution. Contrasting these periods, I argue that the structural and non-agency process factors underwent the same dynamic in both periods, and hence are not sufficient to explain the variation in outcome. I propose that the change in the oppo- sition's ideology accounts for this variation. To establish the causal link, I investigate this ideological change, tracing its role in the actors' decision-making processes. I argue that: (1) Khomeini's theory of Islamic state expanded the set of alternatives to the status quo theory of state, and changed the Islamic opposition's \calculus of protest"; (2) an ideological change is an intellectual innovation/shock, the timing of which is intrinsically uncertain. Therefore, integrating ideology to the theory enhances its explanatory power; (3) an ideological change can serve as an observable intermediate variable that mediates the effect of unobservable cumulative and/or threshold processes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Muting the Trumpets of Sabotage
    Muting the Trumpets of Sabotage: Saudi Arabia, the US and the Quest to Securitize Iran1 Dr Simon Mabon [email protected] In recent years, the rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran has become increasingly influential in shaping the nature of Middle Eastern politics, with the two exerting influence across the region in an attempt to increase their power and to reduce that of the other. Amidst an increasingly fractious region, this article explores Saudi Arabia's attempts to securitize Iran to actors in the US. The signing of the nuclear agreement and the failure of the US to move beyond normal politics signals the failure of Riyadh’s efforts to securitize Iran. Understanding the nature of relationships in the region, particularly between Riyadh and Tehran and between Riyadh and Washington, helps to understand the changing nature of regional politics and ultimately, the emergence of a more pro-active Saudi foreign policy. Words: 10409 1 I would like to thank Dr Sarah Hitchen for her insightful comments on an earlier draft of this article. 1 Introduction In recent years, the rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran has become increasingly influential in shaping the nature of Middle Eastern politics, with the two exerting influence across the region in an attempt to increase their power and to reduce that of the other. Following the execution of the Shi’a cleric Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr on the 2nd January 2016, relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran became increasingly fractious, resulting in the storming of the Saudi embassy in Tehran and the severing of diplomatic ties between the two.
    [Show full text]