DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Dundee Interventions to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Dundee Interventions to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing University of Dundee Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients Davey, Peter; Marwick, Charis A.; Scott, Claire L.; Charani, Esmita; McNeil, Kirsty; Brown, Erwin Published in: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4 Publication date: 2017 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Davey, P., Marwick, C. A., Scott, C. L., Charani, E., McNeil, K., Brown, E., Gould, I. M., Ramsay, C. R., & Michie, S. (2017). Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(2), 1-368. [CD003543]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients (Review) Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, Charani E, McNeilK, Brown E, Gould IM, Ramsay CR, Michie S Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, Charani E, McNeil K, Brown E, Gould IM, Ramsay CR, Michie S. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003543. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4. www.cochranelibrary.com Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients (Review) Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON . ..... 4 BACKGROUND .................................... 8 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 8 METHODS ...................................... 8 RESULTS....................................... 13 Figure1. ..................................... 14 Figure2. ..................................... 16 Figure3. ..................................... 18 Figure4. ..................................... 18 Figure5. ..................................... 19 Figure6. ..................................... 20 Figure7. ..................................... 21 Figure8. ..................................... 22 Figure9. ..................................... 22 Figure10. ..................................... 23 Figure11. ..................................... 24 Figure12. ..................................... 25 Figure13. ..................................... 26 Figure14. ..................................... 27 DISCUSSION ..................................... 28 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 31 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 32 REFERENCES ..................................... 32 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 49 DATAANDANALYSES. 315 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Effectiveness: Prescribing outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 1 Dichotomous outcomes, increase in desired practice. 317 Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Effectiveness: Prescribing outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 2 Dichotomous outcomes, all RCTs with results of cluster RCTs adjusted by inflation factor. .................................... 319 Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Effectiveness: Prescribing outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 3 Dichotomous outcomes, low or medium ’Risk of bias’ studies only. 321 Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Effectiveness: Prescribing outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 4 Continuous outcomes, duration of all antibiotic treatment (days). 322 Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Effectiveness: Prescribing outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 5 Continuous outcomes, duration of all antibiotic treatment with results of cluster RCTs adjusted by inflation factor. 323 Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Effectiveness: Prescribing outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 6 Continuous outcomes, low or medium ’Risk of bias’ studies only. 324 Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Effectiveness: Prescribing outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 7 Continuous outcome, consumption of targeted antibiotic only, standardised mean reduction (original outcome cost, days or DDD). 325 Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 1 Mortality, all RCTs. 326 Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 2 Mortality, all RCTs with results of cluster RCTs adjusted by inflation factor. 328 Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 3 Mortality, low or medium ’Risk of bias’ RCTs. ............... 330 Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients (Review) i Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 4 Length of stay, all RCTs. 331 Analysis 2.5. Comparison 2 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 5 Length of stay, all RCTs with results of cluster RCTs adjusted by inflation factor. 332 Analysis 2.6. Comparison 2 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes from RCTs of interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, Outcome 6 Length of stay, low or medium ’Risk of bias’ RCTs only. ............. 333 Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes of interventions targeting antibiotic choice, Outcome 1 Mortality for trial patients. 334 Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes of interventions targeting antibiotic choice, Outcome 2 Length of stay for trial patients. 335 Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes of interventions targeting antibiotic exposure, Outcome 1 Mortality for trial patients. 336 Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4 Adverse effects: Clinical outcomes of interventions targeting antibiotic exposure, Outcome 2 Length of stay for trial patients. 337 Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Modifiers of intended effect: Comparison of enabling interventions with and without feedback, Outcome1Enablementwithfeedback. 338 Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 Modifiers of intended effect: Comparison of enabling interventions with and without feedback, Outcome 2 Enablement without feedback. 339 ADDITIONALTABLES. 339 APPENDICES ..................................... 346 WHAT’SNEW..................................... 364 HISTORY....................................... 365 CONTRIBUTIONSOFAUTHORS . 366 DECLARATIONSOFINTEREST . 367 SOURCESOFSUPPORT . 367 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PROTOCOL AND REVIEW . .... 367 INDEXTERMS .................................... 368 Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients (Review) ii Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Intervention Review] Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients Peter Davey1, Charis A Marwick2, Claire L Scott3, Esmita Charani4, Kirsty McNeil5, Erwin Brown6, Ian M Gould7, Craig R Ramsay 8, Susan Michie9 1Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 2Population Health Sciences Division, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 3Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme, NHS Education for Scotland, Dundee, UK. 4NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK. 5School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 6No affiliation, Bristol, UK. 7Department of Medical Microbiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK. 8Health Services Research Unit, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. 9Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK Contact address: Peter Davey, Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, Scotland, DD2 4BF, UK. [email protected]. Editorial group: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. Publication status and date: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed), published in Issue 2, 2017. Review content assessed as up-to-date: 19 January 2015. Citation: Davey P,Marwick CA, Scott CL, Charani E, McNeil K, Brown E,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Infant Antibiotic Exposure Search EMBASE 1. Exp Antibiotic Agent/ 2
    Infant Antibiotic Exposure Search EMBASE 1. exp antibiotic agent/ 2. (Acedapsone or Alamethicin or Amdinocillin or Amdinocillin Pivoxil or Amikacin or Aminosalicylic Acid or Amoxicillin or Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination or Amphotericin B or Ampicillin or Anisomycin or Antimycin A or Arsphenamine or Aurodox or Azithromycin or Azlocillin or Aztreonam or Bacitracin or Bacteriocins or Bambermycins or beta-Lactams or Bongkrekic Acid or Brefeldin A or Butirosin Sulfate or Calcimycin or Candicidin or Capreomycin or Carbenicillin or Carfecillin or Cefaclor or Cefadroxil or Cefamandole or Cefatrizine or Cefazolin or Cefixime or Cefmenoxime or Cefmetazole or Cefonicid or Cefoperazone or Cefotaxime or Cefotetan or Cefotiam or Cefoxitin or Cefsulodin or Ceftazidime or Ceftizoxime or Ceftriaxone or Cefuroxime or Cephacetrile or Cephalexin or Cephaloglycin or Cephaloridine or Cephalosporins or Cephalothin or Cephamycins or Cephapirin or Cephradine or Chloramphenicol or Chlortetracycline or Ciprofloxacin or Citrinin or Clarithromycin or Clavulanic Acid or Clavulanic Acids or clindamycin or Clofazimine or Cloxacillin or Colistin or Cyclacillin or Cycloserine or Dactinomycin or Dapsone or Daptomycin or Demeclocycline or Diarylquinolines or Dibekacin or Dicloxacillin or Dihydrostreptomycin Sulfate or Diketopiperazines or Distamycins or Doxycycline or Echinomycin or Edeine or Enoxacin or Enviomycin or Erythromycin or Erythromycin Estolate or Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate or Ethambutol or Ethionamide or Filipin or Floxacillin or Fluoroquinolones
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption: 2016-2018 Early Implementation ISBN 978-92-4-151488-0 © World Health Organization 2018 Some Rights Reserved
    WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption 2016-2018 Early implementation WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption 2016 - 2018 Early implementation WHO report on surveillance of antibiotic consumption: 2016-2018 early implementation ISBN 978-92-4-151488-0 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non- commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. WHO report on surveillance of antibiotic consumption: 2016-2018 early implementation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • E3 Appendix 1 (Part 1 of 2): Search Strategy Used in MEDLINE
    This single copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. For permission to reprint multiple copies or to order presentation-ready copies for distribution, contact CJHP at [email protected] Appendix 1 (part 1 of 2): Search strategy used in MEDLINE # Searches 1 exp *anti-bacterial agents/ or (antimicrobial* or antibacterial* or antibiotic* or antiinfective* or anti-microbial* or anti-bacterial* or anti-biotic* or anti- infective* or “ß-lactam*” or b-Lactam* or beta-Lactam* or ampicillin* or carbapenem* or cephalosporin* or clindamycin or erythromycin or fluconazole* or methicillin or multidrug or multi-drug or penicillin* or tetracycline* or vancomycin).kf,kw,ti. or (antimicrobial or antibacterial or antiinfective or anti-microbial or anti-bacterial or anti-infective or “ß-lactam*” or b-Lactam* or beta-Lactam* or ampicillin* or carbapenem* or cephalosporin* or c lindamycin or erythromycin or fluconazole* or methicillin or multidrug or multi-drug or penicillin* or tetracycline* or vancomycin).ab. /freq=2 2 alamethicin/ or amdinocillin/ or amdinocillin pivoxil/ or amikacin/ or amoxicillin/ or amphotericin b/ or ampicillin/ or anisomycin/ or antimycin a/ or aurodox/ or azithromycin/ or azlocillin/ or aztreonam/ or bacitracin/ or bacteriocins/ or bambermycins/ or bongkrekic acid/ or brefeldin a/ or butirosin sulfate/ or calcimycin/ or candicidin/ or capreomycin/ or carbenicillin/ or carfecillin/ or cefaclor/ or cefadroxil/ or cefamandole/ or cefatrizine/ or cefazolin/ or cefixime/ or cefmenoxime/ or cefmetazole/ or cefonicid/ or cefoperazone/
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption in Europe 2013-2014 SURVEILLANCE REPORT
    SURVEILLANCE REPORT SURVEILLANCE REPORT Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe in Europe consumption of antimicrobial Surveillance Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe 2013-2014 2012 www.ecdc.europa.eu ECDC SURVEILLANCE REPORT Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe 2013–2014 This report of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) was coordinated by Klaus Weist. Contributing authors Klaus Weist, Arno Muller, Ana Hoxha, Vera Vlahović-Palčevski, Christelle Elias, Dominique Monnet and Ole Heuer. Data analysis: Klaus Weist, Arno Muller and Ana Hoxha. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the ESAC-Net Disease Network Coordination Committee members (Marcel Bruch, Philippe Cavalié, Herman Goossens, Jenny Hellman, Susan Hopkins, Stephanie Natsch, Anna Olczak-Pienkowska, Ajay Oza, Arjana Tambić Andrasevic, Peter Zarb) and observers (Jane Robertson, Arno Muller, Mike Sharland, Theo Verheij) for providing valuable comments and scientific advice during the production of the report. All ESAC-Net participants and National Coordinators are acknowledged for providing data and valuable comments on this report. The authors also acknowledge Gaetan Guyodo, Catalin Albu and Anna Renau-Rosell for managing the data and providing technical support to the participating countries. Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe, 2013‒2014. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018. Stockholm, May 2018 ISBN 978-92-9498-187-5 ISSN 2315-0955
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Antimicrobial Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Alexander A
    Alexander A. Vinks · Hartmut Derendorf Johan W. Mouton Editors Fundamentals of Antimicrobial Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Alexander A. Vinks • Hartmut Derendorf Johan W. Mouton Editors Fundamentals of Antimicrobial Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Editors Alexander A. Vinks Hartmut Derendorf Division of Clinical Pharmacology Department of Pharmaceutics Cincinnati Children’s Hospital University of Florida Medical Center and Department of Gainesville College of Pharmacy Pediatrics Gainesville , FL , USA University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati , OH , USA Johan W. Mouton Department of Medical Microbiology Radboudumc, Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen, The Netherlands ISBN 978-0-387-75612-7 ISBN 978-0-387-75613-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75613-4 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013953328 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • European Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units
    TECHNICAL DOCUMENT European surveillance of healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units HAI-Net ICU protocol Protocol version 1.02 www.ecdc.europa.eu ECDC TECHNICAL DOCUMENT European surveillance of healthcare- associated infections in intensive care units HAI-Net ICU protocol, version 1.02 This technical document of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) was coordinated by Carl Suetens. In accordance with the Staff Regulations for Officials and Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union and the ECDC Independence Policy, ECDC staff members shall not, in the performance of their duties, deal with a matter in which, directly or indirectly, they have any personal interest such as to impair their independence. This is version 1.02 of the HAI-Net ICU protocol. Differences between versions 1.01 (December 2010) and 1.02 are purely editorial. Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. European surveillance of healthcare- associated infections in intensive care units – HAI-Net ICU protocol, version 1.02. Stockholm: ECDC; 2015. Stockholm, March 2015 ISBN 978-92-9193-627-4 doi 10.2900/371526 Catalogue number TQ-04-15-186-EN-N © European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2015 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. TECHNICAL DOCUMENT HAI-Net ICU protocol, version 1.02 Table of contents Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Prescribing – Quality Indicators
    Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 12, Supplement 4, 2006 Antibiotic prescribing – quality indicators P1460 Methods: Medical records from all patients with positive blood Is self-medication with antibiotics in Europe cultures in 2001 were analysed retrospectively. Factors driven by prescribed use? predisposing to infections, results of blood cultures, antibiotic use, and outcome were recorded. L. Grigoryan, F.M. Haaijer-Ruskamp, J.G.M. Burgerhof, Results: The antibiotic use in 226 episodes of true bacteraemia J.E. Degener, R. Deschepper, D. Monnet, A. Di Matteo, were analysed. According to guidelines empirical antibiotic ˚ and the SAR E.A. Scicluna, A. Bara, C. Stalsby Lundborg, J. Birkin treatment should be adjusted in 166 episodes. Antibiotic use was group adjusted in 146 (88%) of these 166 episodes, which led to a Objectives: The occurrence of self-medication with antibiotics narrowing of therapy in 118 (80%) episodes. Compared to has been described in the US and Europe, a possible empirical therapy there was a 22% reduction in the number of contributing factor to increased antibiotic resistance. An antibiotics. Adjustment of therapy was more often performed in important reason for using self-medication can be past Gram-negative bacteraemia and polymicrobial cultures than in experience with antibiotics prescribed by health professionals. Gram-positive bacteraemia. In bacteraemia caused by We investigated whether self-medication in Europe follows the ampicillin-resistant E. coli, ampicillin was mostly replaced by same pattern as prescribed use. ciprofloxacin. The cost for 7 days adjusted therapy was 19800 Methods: A population survey was conducted in: North and EUR (23%) less than for 7 days of empirical therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report on Antimicrobials Dispensed in Public Hospitals
    Summary Report on Antimicrobials Dispensed in Public Hospitals Year 2014 - 2016 Infection Control Branch Centre for Health Protection Department of Health October 2019 (Version as at 08 October 2019) Summary Report on Antimicrobial Dispensed CONTENTS in Public Hospitals (2014 - 2016) Contents Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 1 2.1 Healthcare system of Hong Kong ......................... 2 3 Data Sources and Methodology 2 3.1 Data sources .................................... 2 3.2 Methodology ................................... 3 3.3 Antimicrobial names ............................... 4 4 Results 5 4.1 Overall annual dispensed quantities and percentage changes in all HA services . 5 4.1.1 Five most dispensed antimicrobial groups in all HA services . 5 4.1.2 Ten most dispensed antimicrobials in all HA services . 6 4.2 Overall annual dispensed quantities and percentage changes in HA non-inpatient service ....................................... 8 4.2.1 Five most dispensed antimicrobial groups in HA non-inpatient service . 10 4.2.2 Ten most dispensed antimicrobials in HA non-inpatient service . 10 4.2.3 Antimicrobial dispensed in HA non-inpatient service, stratified by service type ................................ 11 4.3 Overall annual dispensed quantities and percentage changes in HA inpatient service ....................................... 12 4.3.1 Five most dispensed antimicrobial groups in HA inpatient service . 13 4.3.2 Ten most dispensed antimicrobials in HA inpatient service . 14 4.3.3 Ten most dispensed antimicrobials in HA inpatient service, stratified by specialty ................................. 15 4.4 Overall annual dispensed quantities and percentage change of locally-important broad-spectrum antimicrobials in all HA services . 16 4.4.1 Locally-important broad-spectrum antimicrobial dispensed in HA inpatient service, stratified by specialty .
    [Show full text]
  • Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies
    Arrhythmogenic potential of drugs FP7-HEALTH-241679 http://www.aritmo-project.org/ Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies V 1.3 Draft Lead beneficiary: EMC Date: 03/01/2010 Nature: Report Dissemination level: D5.2 Report on Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5: Conduct of Additional Observational Security: Studies. Author(s): Gianluca Trifiro’ (EMC), Giampiero Version: v1.1– 2/85 Mazzaglia (F-SIMG) Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT INFOOMATION AND HISTORY ...........................................................................4 DEFINITIONS .................................................... ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................6 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................7 2. STUDY OBJECTIVES................................ ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. 3. METHODS ..........................................................................................................................8 3.1.STUDY DESIGN ....................................................................................................................8 3.2.DATA SOURCES ..................................................................................................................9 3.2.1. IPCI Database .....................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis Plan / Data Specifications the Risk of Acute Liver Injury Associated with the Use of Antibiotics. a Replica
    WP6 validation on methods involving an extended audience Statistical analysis plan / data specifications The risk of acute liver injury associated with the use of antibiotics. A replication study in the Utrecht Patient Oriented Database Version: July 11, 2013 Authors: Renate Udo, Marie L De Bruin Reviewers: Work package 6 members (David Irvine, Stephany Tcherny-Lessenot) 1 1. Context The study described in this protocol is performed within the framework of PROTECT (Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium). The overall objective of PROTECT is to strengthen the monitoring of the benefit-risk of medicines in Europe. Work package 6 “validation on methods involving an extended audience” aims to test the transferability/feasibility of methods developed in other WPs (in particular WP2 and WP5) in a range of data sources owned or managed by Consortium Partners or members of the Extended Audience. The specific aims of this study within WP6 are: to evaluate the external validity of the study protocol on the risk of acute liver injury associated with the use of antibiotics by replicating the study protocol in another database, to study the impact of case validation on the effect estimate for the association between antibiotic exposure and acute liver injury. Of the selected drug-adverse event pairs selected in PROTECT, this study will concentrate on the association between antibiotic use and acute liver injury. On this topic, two sub-studies are performed: a descriptive/outcome validation study and an association study. The descriptive/outcome validation study has been conducted within the Utrecht Patient Oriented Database (UPOD).
    [Show full text]
  • Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine – 5Th Revision. Geneva
    WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR) Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine 5th Revision 2016 Ranking of medically important antimicrobials for risk management of antimicrobial resistance due to non-human use Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine – 5th rev. ISBN 978-92-4-151222-0 © World Health Organization 2017, Updated in June 2017 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine – 5th rev. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
    [Show full text]
  • 6-Veterinary-Medicinal-Products-Criteria-Designation-Antimicrobials-Be-Reserved-Treatment
    31 October 2019 EMA/CVMP/158366/2019 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use Advice on implementing measures under Article 37(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 on veterinary medicinal products – Criteria for the designation of antimicrobials to be reserved for treatment of certain infections in humans Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Introduction On 6 February 2019, the European Commission sent a request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for a report on the criteria for the designation of antimicrobials to be reserved for the treatment of certain infections in humans in order to preserve the efficacy of those antimicrobials. The Agency was requested to provide a report by 31 October 2019 containing recommendations to the Commission as to which criteria should be used to determine those antimicrobials to be reserved for treatment of certain infections in humans (this is also referred to as ‘criteria for designating antimicrobials for human use’, ‘restricting antimicrobials to human use’, or ‘reserved for human use only’). The Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) formed an expert group to prepare the scientific report. The group was composed of seven experts selected from the European network of experts, on the basis of recommendations from the national competent authorities, one expert nominated from European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), one expert nominated by European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), one expert with expertise on human infectious diseases, and two Agency staff members with expertise on development of antimicrobial resistance .
    [Show full text]