UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Genetics and Epigenetics of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Bioengineering by Athurva Jayavant Gore Committee in charge: Professor Kun Zhang, Chair Professor Adam Engler Professor Lawrence S. B. Goldstein Professor Xiaohua Huang Professor Alysson Muotri 2013 Copyright Athurva Jayavant Gore, 2013 All rights reserved. SIGNATURE PAGE The Dissertation of Athurva Jayavant Gore is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2013 iii DEDICATION For my wife, my parents, and my brother. Thank you for all your support. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE..................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION............................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... xi LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................xiii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................... xiv VITA...........................................................................................................................xvii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION.....................................................................xviii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................1 1.1 Next Generation Sequencing ...........................................................................1 1.2 Targeted Sequencing.......................................................................................3 1.3 Bisulfite Sequencing.........................................................................................5 1.4 Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells........................................................................7 1.5 Scope of the Dissertation .................................................................................8 Chapter 2: Library-Free Bisulfite Sequencing with Padlock Probes ...........................11 2.1 Abstract ..........................................................................................................11 2.2 Introduction ....................................................................................................11 2.3 Methods .........................................................................................................13 2.3.1 Bisulfite padlock probe production (Agilent) ............................................13 2.3.2 Bisulfite padlock probe production (LC Sciences)...................................14 2.3.4 Sample preparation and capture .............................................................15 v 2.3.5 Capture circles amplification (Library-free protocol, Agilent)...................16 2.3.6 Capture circles amplification (Library-free protocol, LC Sciences)..........16 2.3.7 Primer barcode design for multiplexing ...................................................16 2.3.8 Bisulfite read mapping and data analysis................................................17 2.3.9 Correlation of methylation levels between two samples..........................17 2.3.10 Analysis of differential methylation ........................................................18 2.4 Results ...........................................................................................................18 2.5 Conclusions....................................................................................................23 2.6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................24 Chapter 3: Identification of Coding Mutations in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells ......40 3.1 Abstract ..........................................................................................................40 3.2 Introduction ....................................................................................................40 3.3 Methods .........................................................................................................42 3.3.1 CV fibroblast derivation ...........................................................................42 3.3.2 CV-hiPS-B and CV-hiPS-F derivation .....................................................42 3.3.4 CV-hiPS characterization ........................................................................43 3.3.5 dH1F-iPS8 and dH1F-iPS9 derivation.....................................................44 3.3.6 hiPS 11a, 11b, 17a, 17b, 29A and 29e derivation...................................44 3.3.7 HFFxF fibroblast derivation .....................................................................46 3.3.8 FiPS3F1 and FiPS4F7 generation ..........................................................46 3.3.9 FiPS3F1 and FiPS4F7 characterization ..................................................47 3.3.10 CF-Fib, CF-RiPS1.4 and CF-RiPS1.9 derivation ..................................48 3.3.11 FiPS4F2 and FiPS4F-shpRb4.5 plasmid construction ..........................49 3.3.12 FiPS4F2 and FiPS4F-shpRb4.5 retroviral and lentiviral production......49 3.3.13 FiPS4F2P9, FiPS4F2P40 and FiPS4F-shpRb4.5 derivation ................50 vi 3.3.14 FiPS4F2 and FiPS4F-shpRb4.5 characterization .................................50 3.3.15 Preparation of padlock probes ..............................................................51 3.3.16 Multiplex capture of exonic regions .......................................................52 3.3.17 Amplification of capture circles..............................................................52 3.3.18 Shotgun sequencing library construction ..............................................53 3.3.19 Hybridization capture with DNA or RNA baits .......................................54 3.3.20 Consensus sequence generation and variant calling............................54 3.3.21 Sanger validation of candidate mutations .............................................55 3.3.22 Clonal fibroblast experiments ................................................................56 3.3.23 Digital quantification of mutations..........................................................57 3.3.24 Statistical analysis—probability of mutations occurring naturally ..........59 3.3.25 Statistical analysis—digital quantification..............................................60 3.3.26 Statistical analysis—NS/S mutation ratio ..............................................61 3.3.27 Statistical analysis—pathway and COSMIC gene enrichment..............61 3.4 Results ...........................................................................................................62 3.4.1 hiPS cell lines contain a high level of mutational load.............................62 3.4.2 Reprogramming-associated mutations arise through multiple mechanisms ........................................................................................................64 3.5 Conclusions....................................................................................................68 3.6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................70 Chapter 4: Functional Consequences of Coding Mutations in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells ..................................................................................................................79 4.1 Abstract ..........................................................................................................79 4.2 Introduction ....................................................................................................79 4.3 Methods .........................................................................................................81 vii 4.3.1 Cell culture...............................................................................................81 4.3.2 hiPSC generation. ...................................................................................81 4.3.3 Plasmid construction. ..............................................................................82 4.3.4 Retroviral and lentiviral production. .........................................................83 4.3.5 Immunostaining. ......................................................................................83 4.3.6 RNA isolation and real-time PCR analysis. .............................................84 4.3.7 Whole-genome library construction.........................................................84 4.3.8 In-solution hybridization capture with DNA baits. ....................................84 4.3.9 Consensus sequence generation and variant calling..............................84 4.3.10 Sanger validation of candidate mutations. ............................................85 4.3.11 Statistical
Recommended publications
  • Genetic Variation Across the Human Olfactory Receptor Repertoire Alters Odor Perception
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212431; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception Casey Trimmer1,*, Andreas Keller2, Nicolle R. Murphy1, Lindsey L. Snyder1, Jason R. Willer3, Maira Nagai4,5, Nicholas Katsanis3, Leslie B. Vosshall2,6,7, Hiroaki Matsunami4,8, and Joel D. Mainland1,9 1Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 2Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA 3Center for Human Disease Modeling, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA 4Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil 6Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, New York, USA 7Kavli Neural Systems Institute, New York, New York, USA 8Department of Neurobiology and Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA 9Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA *[email protected] ABSTRACT The human olfactory receptor repertoire is characterized by an abundance of genetic variation that affects receptor response, but the perceptual effects of this variation are unclear. To address this issue, we sequenced the OR repertoire in 332 individuals and examined the relationship between genetic variation and 276 olfactory phenotypes, including the perceived intensity and pleasantness of 68 odorants at two concentrations, detection thresholds of three odorants, and general olfactory acuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Metallothionein Monoclonal Antibody, Clone N11-G
    Metallothionein monoclonal antibody, clone N11-G Catalog # : MAB9787 規格 : [ 50 uL ] List All Specification Application Image Product Rabbit monoclonal antibody raised against synthetic peptide of MT1A, Western Blot (Recombinant protein) Description: MT1B, MT1E, MT1F, MT1G, MT1H, MT1IP, MT1L, MT1M, MT2A. Immunogen: A synthetic peptide corresponding to N-terminus of human MT1A, MT1B, MT1E, MT1F, MT1G, MT1H, MT1IP, MT1L, MT1M, MT2A. Host: Rabbit enlarge Reactivity: Human, Mouse Immunoprecipitation Form: Liquid Enzyme-linked Immunoabsorbent Assay Recommend Western Blot (1:1000) Usage: ELISA (1:5000-1:10000) The optimal working dilution should be determined by the end user. Storage Buffer: In 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 (10 mg/mL BSA, 0.05% sodium azide) Storage Store at -20°C. Instruction: Note: This product contains sodium azide: a POISONOUS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE which should be handled by trained staff only. Datasheet: Download Applications Western Blot (Recombinant protein) Western blot analysis of recombinant Metallothionein protein with Metallothionein monoclonal antibody, clone N11-G (Cat # MAB9787). Lane 1: 1 ug. Lane 2: 3 ug. Lane 3: 5 ug. Immunoprecipitation Enzyme-linked Immunoabsorbent Assay ASSP5 MT1A MT1B MT1E MT1F MT1G MT1H MT1M MT1L MT1IP Page 1 of 5 2021/6/2 Gene Information Entrez GeneID: 4489 Protein P04731 (Gene ID : 4489);P07438 (Gene ID : 4490);P04732 (Gene ID : Accession#: 4493);P04733 (Gene ID : 4494);P13640 (Gene ID : 4495);P80294 (Gene ID : 4496);P80295 (Gene ID : 4496);Q8N339 (Gene ID : 4499);Q86YX0 (Gene ID : 4490);Q86YX5
    [Show full text]
  • CD56+ T-Cells in Relation to Cytomegalovirus in Healthy Subjects and Kidney Transplant Patients
    CD56+ T-cells in Relation to Cytomegalovirus in Healthy Subjects and Kidney Transplant Patients Institute of Infection and Global Health Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Mazen Mohammed Almehmadi December 2014 - 1 - Abstract Human T cells expressing CD56 are capable of tumour cell lysis following activation with interleukin-2 but their role in viral immunity has been less well studied. The work described in this thesis aimed to investigate CD56+ T-cells in relation to cytomegalovirus infection in healthy subjects and kidney transplant patients (KTPs). Proportions of CD56+ T cells were found to be highly significantly increased in healthy cytomegalovirus-seropositive (CMV+) compared to cytomegalovirus-seronegative (CMV-) subjects (8.38% ± 0.33 versus 3.29%± 0.33; P < 0.0001). In donor CMV-/recipient CMV- (D-/R-)- KTPs levels of CD56+ T cells were 1.9% ±0.35 versus 5.42% ±1.01 in D+/R- patients and 5.11% ±0.69 in R+ patients (P 0.0247 and < 0.0001 respectively). CD56+ T cells in both healthy CMV+ subjects and KTPs expressed markers of effector memory- RA T-cells (TEMRA) while in healthy CMV- subjects and D-/R- KTPs the phenotype was predominantly that of naïve T-cells. Other surface markers, CD8, CD4, CD58, CD57, CD94 and NKG2C were expressed by a significantly higher proportion of CD56+ T-cells in healthy CMV+ than CMV- subjects. Functional studies showed levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α, as well as granzyme B and CD107a were significantly higher in CD56+ T-cells from CMV+ than CMV- subjects following stimulation with CMV antigens.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Structural Properties of Methylated Human Promoter Regions in Terms of Dna Helical Rise
    INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF METHYLATED HUMAN PROMOTER REGIONS IN TERMS OF DNA HELICAL RISE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF INFORMATICS OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY BURCU YALDIZ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOINFORMATICS AUGUST 2014 INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF METHYLATED HUMAN PROMOTER REGIONS IN TERMS OF DNA HELICAL RISE submitted by Burcu YALDIZ in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, Bioinformatics Program, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Nazife Baykal _____________________ Director, Informatics Institute Assist. Prof. Dr. Yeşim Aydın Son _____________________ Head of Department, Health Informatics, METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Yeşim Aydın Son Supervisor, Health Informatics, METU _____________________ Examining Committee Members: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tolga Can _____________________ METU, CENG Assist. Prof. Dr. Yeşim Aydın Son _____________________ METU, Health Informatics Assist. Prof. Dr. Aybar Can Acar _____________________ METU, Health Informatics Assist. Prof. Dr. Özlen Konu _____________________ Bilkent University, Molecular Biology and Genetics Assoc. Prof. Dr. Çağdaş D. Son _____________________ METU, Biology Date: 27.08.2014 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Burcu Yaldız Signature : iii ABSTRACT INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF METHYLATED HUMAN PROMOTER REGIONS IN TERMS OF DNA HELICAL RISE Yaldız, Burcu M.Sc. Bioinformatics Program Advisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Yeşim Aydın Son August 2014, 60 pages The infamous double helix structure of DNA was assumed to be a rigid, uniformly observed structure throughout the genomic DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement 1 Microarray Studies
    EASE Categories Significantly Enriched in vs MG vs vs MGC4-2 Pt1-C vs C4-2 Pt1-C UP-Regulated Genes MG System Gene Category EASE Global MGRWV Pt1-N RWV Pt1-N Score FDR GO Molecular Extracellular matrix cellular construction 0.0008 0 110 genes up- Function Interpro EGF-like domain 0.0009 0 regulated GO Molecular Oxidoreductase activity\ acting on single dono 0.0015 0 Function GO Molecular Calcium ion binding 0.0018 0 Function Interpro Laminin-G domain 0.0025 0 GO Biological Process Cell Adhesion 0.0045 0 Interpro Collagen Triple helix repeat 0.0047 0 KEGG pathway Complement and coagulation cascades 0.0053 0 KEGG pathway Immune System – Homo sapiens 0.0053 0 Interpro Fibrillar collagen C-terminal domain 0.0062 0 Interpro Calcium-binding EGF-like domain 0.0077 0 GO Molecular Cell adhesion molecule activity 0.0105 0 Function EASE Categories Significantly Enriched in Down-Regulated Genes System Gene Category EASE Global Score FDR GO Biological Process Copper ion homeostasis 2.5E-09 0 Interpro Metallothionein 6.1E-08 0 Interpro Vertebrate metallothionein, Family 1 6.1E-08 0 GO Biological Process Transition metal ion homeostasis 8.5E-08 0 GO Biological Process Heavy metal sensitivity/resistance 1.9E-07 0 GO Biological Process Di-, tri-valent inorganic cation homeostasis 6.3E-07 0 GO Biological Process Metal ion homeostasis 6.3E-07 0 GO Biological Process Cation homeostasis 2.1E-06 0 GO Biological Process Cell ion homeostasis 2.1E-06 0 GO Biological Process Ion homeostasis 2.1E-06 0 GO Molecular Helicase activity 2.3E-06 0 Function GO Biological
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Roles of Metallothioneins in Beta Cell Pathophysiology: Beyond and Above Metal Homeostasis and Antioxidant Response
    biology Review Emerging Roles of Metallothioneins in Beta Cell Pathophysiology: Beyond and above Metal Homeostasis and Antioxidant Response Mohammed Bensellam 1,* , D. Ross Laybutt 2,3 and Jean-Christophe Jonas 1 1 Pôle D’endocrinologie, Diabète et Nutrition, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; [email protected] 3 St Vincent’s Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-2764-9586 Simple Summary: Defective insulin secretion by pancreatic beta cells is key for the development of type 2 diabetes but the precise mechanisms involved are poorly understood. Metallothioneins are metal binding proteins whose precise biological roles have not been fully characterized. Available evidence indicated that Metallothioneins are protective cellular effectors involved in heavy metal detoxification, metal ion homeostasis and antioxidant defense. This concept has however been challenged by emerging evidence in different medical research fields revealing novel negative roles of Metallothioneins, including in the context of diabetes. In this review, we gather and analyze the available knowledge regarding the complex roles of Metallothioneins in pancreatic beta cell biology and insulin secretion. We comprehensively analyze the evidence showing positive effects Citation: Bensellam, M.; Laybutt, of Metallothioneins on beta cell function and survival as well as the emerging evidence revealing D.R.; Jonas, J.-C. Emerging Roles of negative effects and discuss the possible underlying mechanisms. We expose in parallel findings Metallothioneins in Beta Cell from other medical research fields and underscore unsettled questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Phytochemicals in Colon Cancer Prevention: a Nutrigenomics Approach
    Role of phytochemicals in colon cancer prevention: a nutrigenomics approach Marjan J van Erk Promotor: Prof. Dr. P.J. van Bladeren Hoogleraar in de Toxicokinetiek en Biotransformatie Wageningen Universiteit Co-promotoren: Dr. Ir. J.M.M.J.G. Aarts Universitair Docent, Sectie Toxicologie Wageningen Universiteit Dr. Ir. B. van Ommen Senior Research Fellow Nutritional Systems Biology TNO Voeding, Zeist Promotiecommissie: Prof. Dr. P. Dolara University of Florence, Italy Prof. Dr. J.A.M. Leunissen Wageningen Universiteit Prof. Dr. J.C. Mathers University of Newcastle, United Kingdom Prof. Dr. M. Müller Wageningen Universiteit Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool VLAG Role of phytochemicals in colon cancer prevention: a nutrigenomics approach Marjan Jolanda van Erk Proefschrift ter verkrijging van graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof.Dr.Ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 1 oktober 2004 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula Title Role of phytochemicals in colon cancer prevention: a nutrigenomics approach Author Marjan Jolanda van Erk Thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2004) with abstract, with references, with summary in Dutch ISBN 90-8504-085-X ABSTRACT Role of phytochemicals in colon cancer prevention: a nutrigenomics approach Specific food compounds, especially from fruits and vegetables, may protect against development of colon cancer. In this thesis effects and mechanisms of various phytochemicals in relation to colon cancer prevention were studied through application of large-scale gene expression profiling. Expression measurement of thousands of genes can yield a more complete and in-depth insight into the mode of action of the compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Signatures of Maturing Dendritic Cells
    Jin et al. Journal of Translational Medicine 2010, 8:4 http://www.translational-medicine.com/content/8/1/4 RESEARCH Open Access Molecular signatures of maturing dendritic cells: implications for testing the quality of dendritic cell therapies Ping Jin1*†, Tae Hee Han1,2†, Jiaqiang Ren1, Stefanie Saunders1, Ena Wang1, Francesco M Marincola1, David F Stroncek1 Abstract Background: Dendritic cells (DCs) are often produced by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM- CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) stimulation of monocytes. To improve the effectiveness of DC adoptive immune cancer therapy, many different agents have been used to mature DCs. We analyzed the kinetics of DC maturation by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon-g (IFN-g) induction in order to characterize the usefulness of mature DCs (mDCs) for immune therapy and to identify biomarkers for assessing the quality of mDCs. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from 6 healthy subjects by apheresis, monocytes were isolated by elutriation, and immature DCs (iDCs) were produced by 3 days of culture with GM-CSF and IL-4. The iDCs were sampled after 4, 8 and 24 hours in culture with LPS and IFN-g and were then assessed by flow cytometry, ELISA, and global gene and microRNA (miRNA) expression analysis. Results: After 24 hours of LPS and IFN-g stimulation, DC surface expression of CD80, CD83, CD86, and HLA Class II antigens were up-regulated. Th1 attractant genes such as CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11 and CCL5 were up-regulated during maturation but not Treg attractants such as CCL22 and CXCL12. The expression of classical mDC biomarker genes CD83, CCR7, CCL5, CCL8, SOD2, MT2A, OASL, GBP1 and HES4 were up-regulated throughout maturation while MTIB, MTIE, MTIG, MTIH, GADD45A and LAMP3 were only up-regulated late in maturation.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2012/174282 A2 20 December 2012 (20.12.2012) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2012/174282 A2 20 December 2012 (20.12.2012) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: David [US/US]; 13539 N . 95th Way, Scottsdale, AZ C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) 85260 (US). (21) International Application Number: (74) Agent: AKHAVAN, Ramin; Caris Science, Inc., 6655 N . PCT/US20 12/0425 19 Macarthur Blvd., Irving, TX 75039 (US). (22) International Filing Date: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 14 June 2012 (14.06.2012) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, English (25) Filing Language: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, Publication Language: English DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, (30) Priority Data: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 61/497,895 16 June 201 1 (16.06.201 1) US MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 61/499,138 20 June 201 1 (20.06.201 1) US OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SC, SD, 61/501,680 27 June 201 1 (27.06.201 1) u s SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, 61/506,019 8 July 201 1(08.07.201 1) u s TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Metallothioneins in Carcinogenesis Manfei Si and Jinghe Lang*
    Si and Lang Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2018) 11:107 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-018-0645-x REVIEW Open Access The roles of metallothioneins in carcinogenesis Manfei Si and Jinghe Lang* Abstract Metallothioneins (MTs) are small cysteine-rich proteins that play important roles in metal homeostasis and protection against heavy metal toxicity, DNA damage, and oxidative stress. In humans, MTs have four main isoforms (MT1, MT2, MT3, and MT4) that are encoded by genes located on chromosome 16q13. MT1 comprises eight known functional (sub)isoforms (MT1A, MT1B, MT1E, MT1F, MT1G, MT1H, MT1M, and MT1X). Emerging evidence shows that MTs play a pivotal role in tumor formation, progression, and drug resistance. However, the expression of MTs is not universal in all human tumors and may depend on the type and differentiation status of tumors, as well as other environmental stimuli or gene mutations. More importantly, the differential expression of particular MT isoforms can be utilized for tumor diagnosis and therapy. This review summarizes the recent knowledge on the functions and mechanisms of MTs in carcinogenesis and describes the differential expression and regulation of MT isoforms in various malignant tumors. The roles of MTs in tumor growth, differentiation, angiogenesis, metastasis, microenvironment remodeling, immune escape, and drug resistance are also discussed. Finally, this review highlights the potential of MTs as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis and introduces some current applications of targeting MT isoforms in cancer therapy. The knowledge on the MTs may provide new insights for treating cancer and bring hope for the elimination of cancer. Keywords: Metallothionein, Metal homeostasis, Cancer, Carcinogenesis, Biomarker Background [6–10].
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential Druggability of Chemosensory G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Beyond the Flavour: The Potential Druggability of Chemosensory G Protein-Coupled Receptors Antonella Di Pizio * , Maik Behrens and Dietmar Krautwurst Leibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, Freising, 85354, Germany; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (D.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-8161-71-2904; Fax: +49-8161-71-2970 Received: 13 February 2019; Accepted: 12 March 2019; Published: 20 March 2019 Abstract: G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) belong to the largest class of drug targets. Approximately half of the members of the human GPCR superfamily are chemosensory receptors, including odorant receptors (ORs), trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs), bitter taste receptors (TAS2Rs), sweet and umami taste receptors (TAS1Rs). Interestingly, these chemosensory GPCRs (csGPCRs) are expressed in several tissues of the body where they are supposed to play a role in biological functions other than chemosensation. Despite their abundance and physiological/pathological relevance, the druggability of csGPCRs has been suggested but not fully characterized. Here, we aim to explore the potential of targeting csGPCRs to treat diseases by reviewing the current knowledge of csGPCRs expressed throughout the body and by analysing the chemical space and the drug-likeness of flavour molecules. Keywords: smell; taste; flavour molecules; drugs; chemosensory receptors; ecnomotopic expression 1. Introduction Thirty-five percent of approved drugs act by modulating G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [1,2]. GPCRs, also named 7-transmembrane (7TM) receptors, based on their canonical structure, are the largest family of membrane receptors in the human genome.
    [Show full text]
  • NUDT21-Spanning Cnvs Lead to Neuropsychiatric Disease And
    Vincenzo A. Gennarino1,2†, Callison E. Alcott2,3,4†, Chun-An Chen1,2, Arindam Chaudhury5,6, Madelyn A. Gillentine1,2, Jill A. Rosenfeld1, Sumit Parikh7, James W. Wheless8, Elizabeth R. Roeder9,10, Dafne D. G. Horovitz11, Erin K. Roney1, Janice L. Smith1, Sau W. Cheung1, Wei Li12, Joel R. Neilson5,6, Christian P. Schaaf1,2 and Huda Y. Zoghbi1,2,13,14. 1Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA. 2Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA. 3Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA. 4Medical Scientist Training Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA. 5Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA. 6Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA. 7Center for Child Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, United States. 8Department of Pediatric Neurology, Neuroscience Institute and Tuberous Sclerosis Clinic, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. 9Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 10Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 11Instituto Nacional de Saude da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira - Depto de Genetica Medica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 12Division of Biostatistics, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA. 13Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.
    [Show full text]