Post-9/11 American Invasion of Afghanistan: Reasons and Motivations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Post-9/11 American Invasion of Afghanistan: Reasons and Motivations Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research idi University-Oum El Bouaghi Faculty of Letters and Languages Department of English Post-9/11 American Invasion of Afghanistan: Reasons and Motivations A Mémoire Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Anglo-American Studies By: BECHEKAOUI Youcef Board of Examiners: Dr. MAAMERI Fatima, Supervisor BOUDJLIT Amina, member 2016-2017 Abstract The reasons and motivations that led Unites States of America to invade Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks made a hot debate among many historians and politicians. Thus, this study is significant because it sheds light on the main embedded aims that the United States of America never stated behind its invasion in the aftermath of the 9/11 events. Although the United States of America claimed that the fundamental reason behind the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 is the 9/11 attacks, there are many other reasons that were overlooked. Afghanistan has a very important geo-strategic location in the world; thereby, this feature allows the United States government to accomplish its economic and political interests within Afghanistan and Central Asia. This study has come to the conclusion that the United States of America used 9/11 attacks as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and serve its imperialistic interests in the area. Keywords: Unites States, Afghanistan, 9/11 attacks, invasion of Afghanistan, economic and political interests, pretext Résumé Les raisons et motivations qui mènent les É tats-Unis D Amérique à envahir juste après les attentats du 11 septembre, a éveillé un débat chaleureux au sein des historiens et politiciens. Ainsi, cette étude est signifiante principaux objectifs fixés que les É tats-Unis jamais mentionnés concernant leur invasion suite aux évènements du 11 septembre. Bien que les É tats-Unis affirment que la raison fondamentale de leur invasion en Afghanistan en 2001 est les ignorées. ce qui pousse le gouvernement des É tats-Unis à accomplir leurs intérêts économiques et politiques avec Centrale. En conclusion, cette étude a pour objectif de montrer queles É tats-Unis ont utilisé les attentats du 11 septembre comme et réaliser leurs intérêts impériaux dans la région. Mots clés : les É tats-Unis les attentats du 11 septembre, les intérêts économiques et politiques, le prétexte. ii Dedication I would like to dedicate this humble work to my dearest persons in my life; my Father and my Mother who provided me with everything to achieve this work especially my father. I would like to dedicate this work to all people who have helped me in achieving this work; friends, classmates, and teachers. iii Acknowledgments This work would not have been done without the advice, patience, wisdom, and support of Dr. Fatima Maameri. I owe immense gratitude to my Supervisor Dr. Fatima Maameri for her guidance, instructions, and assistance. I would like to thank all who contributed in this work through encouraging, and supporting me to finish this work. Finally, special thanks go to my best friends Malek, Fateh, Muhammed, and Jahid. iv Acronyms BBC: British Broadcasting Corporation. CIA: Central Intelligence Agency. CNN: Cable News Network. ISI: Inter-Services Intelligence. NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization. USAID: United States Agency for International Development. USSR: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. UN: United Nations. UNOCAL: Union Oil of California. v Table of Contents Abstract Dedication ii Acknowledgement .................. iii List of iv Table of v General Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Historical Background Introduction 4 I. The US-Afghan Diplomatic Relations before 9/11 Attacks 4 II. II. US-Afghan Partnership and Cooperation .......................................... 6 III. The Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan and its Impact on US-Afghan Relations, 1979-1989 1. The Foundation of Al-Qaeda Network 7 A. The Funding of Al-Qaeda 8 B. Bin Laden 9 2. Pakistan and its Role during the Soviet Invasion 12 IV. Taliban 1. The Emergence of Taliban vi 2. US-Taliban Relations 1994-2001 V. The 9/11 Attacks on New York and Washington, D.C. 2001 18 1. US Reaction to 9/11 Attacks 18 2. The International Response to 9/11 19 VI. Post-9/11 Invasion of Afghanistan, 2001 19 Conclusion ................ 20 Chapter 2: The Explicit and Implicit Reasons and Motivations of the Post-9/11 American Invasion of Afghanistan Introduction ... 24 I. The Political Reasons: 1. The 9/11 Attacks: The American Excuse to Invade Afghanistan 24 2. Humanitarian Intervention 3. The War on Terror 26 4. Democracy Promotion II. The Geo-Political Reasons: The Geo-Strategic Location of Afghanistan 30 III. The Economic Reasons: Gas and Oil Pipelines and Mineral Resources 33 39 Conclusion 40 vii Endnotes 42 List of Works Cited 43 1 General Introduction 9 September 2001 is marked as unforgettable day in the history of the United States. At that day, the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were crashed down by terrorist attacks. These attacks resulted in the death and injury of thousands of the American people. The 9/11 attacks were the turning point in United States and , in which the US government accused Al-Qaeda organization of these strikes as well as Taliban who were harboring Bin Laden and his followers. Thus, the Bush government declared war against Afghanistan that was launched one month later after the attacks occurred. Although the United States of America claimed that the fundamental reason behind the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 is the 9/11 attacks, there are many other reasons that were overlooked. This research aims at exploring the direct reasons, which led to the American invasion of Afghanistan in the post-9/11 attacks. Moreover, this study attempts to find out the embedded reasons which drove the Americans to invade the Afghan. Further, it seeks to determine the pull motivations that attracted the US interests in Afghanistan and Central Asia. Besides, this work tries to shed the light on the background of terrorism and its origins as well as the legitimacy of the American invasion of Afghanistan according to international law. This study attempts to find some suitable answers to many questions. Prominent among them is why did United States invade Afghanistan following 9/11 attacks? What 2 are the embedded reasons behind the American invasion of Afghanistan along with the direct ones? Is the US invasion of Afghanistan in the post-9/11 legal according to the international law? Concerning methodology, this Mémoire depends on different methods to achieve i s aim and have a clear understanding of the implicit and explicit reasons which drove United States of America to invade Afghanistan in the aftermath of 9/11 attacks. The first method used is the descriptive method, which helps reviewing the history of the diplomatic relations of Afghanistan and United States from its first contacts until the American invasion of Afghanistan. The second approach is rather analytical. It is used to analyze and scrutinize the various data, literature, and narratives in order to understand the direct reasons used by the American government to wage war against Afghanistan in 2001 as well as the implicit and hidden ones. Finally, in style, this Mémoire depends on the Modern Language Association (MLA), 7th edition. This study has depended on sources and literary materials in order to provide more comprehension and clear analysis to the American occupation of Afghanistan following 9/11 events. These sources consist of books, articles, encyclopedias, interviews, theses and others. The information provided by the Afghan Embassy in Washington, D.C. is very useful in tracing the history of the diplomatic relations of the US and Afghanistan ing creating terrorism during the Soviet-Afghan war to defeat the Soviet troops and oust them out of Afghanistan. 3 This research is made up of two chapters; the first chapter speaks about the historical background. It tackles the history of the US-Afghan diplomatic relations from their first establishment to 2001. Further, it sheds light on the Soviet-Afghan war, 1979- 1989 and the American support provided to the Afghan rebels to fight the Soviet troops in Afghanistan. In addition, it highlights the role of the US in the creation of Al-Qaeda organization and the assistance given to Taliban to take over Kabul in 1996. The second chapter highlights the major reasons provided by the Americans to invade Afghanistan in the wake of 9/11 attacks like war on terrorism, humanitarian intervention, and democracy promotion. Besides, this chapter examines the most important imperialistic objectives, which the American government did not declare to the public. The US hidden aims behind waging war on Afghanistan are most significant mainly the building of an oil pipeline across Afghanistan and the establishment of a permanent military bases in Afghanistan to sustain its imperialistic interests within Afghanistan and the Central Asia area as whole. 4 CHAPTER I: Historical Background Introduction: Historically speaking, the Middle East and Central Asia spheres have been a hotspots, conflictual points, and zones of instability. Afghanistan is one of the nations of this area which, throughout its history, had seen many interventions, wars and conflicts. major occupations of Afghanistan. The US intervention in Afghanistan, particularly, occurred in October 2001 shortly after the attacks on the World Trade Center in New Yo US-Afghan diplomatic relations prior to those attacks may give a better understanding and provide a clear analysis about the post- 9/11 US invasion of Afghanistan. I. The US-Afghan Diplomatic Relations before 9/11 Attacks According to the Embassy of Afghanistan in Washington, D.C., the US-Afghan diplomatic relations date back to the first part of the 19th century. The first contact happened in 1830 when Josiah Harlan1, a Pennsylvania political activist, ventured into Afghanistan.
Recommended publications
  • REPSOL YPF Argentina
    Buenos Aires, 2000 XI REPSOL YPF-HARVARD SEMINAR HARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA DECEMBER 2000 ENERGY POLICIES AND MARKETS: NEW TRENDS OR OLD CYCLES? WILLIAM W. HOGAN BIJAN MOSSAVAR-RAHMANI EDITORS THE REPSOL YPF-HARVARD SEMINAR SERIES JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT HARVARD UNIVERSITY 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 USA REPSOL YPF Paseo de la Castellana 278 28046 Madrid, Spain FUNDACIÓN REPSOL Juan Bravo 3B 28006 Madrid, Spain ISBN: [TO BE ADDED] Depósito legal: [to be added] Copyright 2001© FUNDACIÓN REPSOL Servicio de Publicaciones CONTENTS FOREWORD ........................................................................................v EDITORS’ NOTE .................................................................................ix OPENING SESSION WELCOME MR. ALFONSO CORTINA ........................................................3 «ARGENTINA’S ECONOMY IN THE NEW CENTURY» THE HONORABLE JOSÉ LUIS MACHINEA ...................................11 KEYNOTE ADDRESS «LIBERALIZATION AND THE ECONOMY IN LATIN AMERICA» THE HONORABLE DOMINGO F. C AVALLO .................................17 SESSION I OIL INTRODUCTORY REMARKS MR. BIJAN MOSSAVAR-RAHMANI ..........................................29 «PERSPECTIVES ON THE INTERNATIONAL OIL MARKET» MR. ADRIÁN LAJOUS ..........................................................33 «POLITICS AND OIL» MR. RICHARD PERLE...........................................................43 «FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS ON THE PRICE OF OIL» THE HONORABLE HUMBERTO CALDERÓN
    [Show full text]
  • BP's Fracking Secrets: Pan American Energy And
    BP’s fracking secrets Pan-American Energy and Argentina’s shale mega-project November 2017 This report was researched and written by Anna Markova (Platform) with input from Hernán Scandizzo BP does not carry out and Diego Di Risio (OPSur). Thanks also to Ariana Ortega and Martín Alvarez (OPSur), Mika Minio- Paluello and Sarah Shoraka (Platform) and Paul fracking in its home Horsman (Greenpeace). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons country, the UK, Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) licence. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes, on the condition because “it would that you attribute the source. License terms: https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ attract the wrong kind of attention” Platform is a London-based organisation that conducts research, education, and campaigns towards a just future beyond fossil fuels. UK company limited by guarantee no. 2658515, registered charity no. 1044485. [email protected] +44 (0)20 7749 1109 Contents Summary 3 Observatorio Petrolero Sur conducts research, 1 BP and Pan-American Energy 4 communications, and intervenes in public policy for a just transition towards a sustainable society 2 What is Vaca Muerta? 8 and energy system. [email protected] +54 (011) 4373-6304 – Buenos Aires 3 Who is BP? 10 +54 (0299) 15 586-4313 – Neuquén 4 Pan-American Energy’s dossier 12 5 The bet on extreme gas 14 Addendum Pan-American Energy in other countries 18 This publication has been produced with the financial Endnotes 19 assistance of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive
    Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive Interviewee: James C. Langdon, Jr. Interviewer: Rebecca Adeline Johnston Date: July 2, 2018 Location: Austin, TX Abstract James Calhoun Langdon, Jr. is Partner Emeritus at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP. A leading legal specialist in the energy sector, he has represented governments and oil and gas companies in the United States, Latin America, Europe, and numerous countries of the former Soviet Union. His government service has included positions at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Federal Energy Administration, and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, which he chaired in 2005. He is a co-creator and founding board member of the Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law and an alum of the University of Texas-Austin as well as its School of Law. This interview provides an overview of Mr. Langdon’s experience working in Azerbaijan, Russia, and Kazakhstan throughout the 1990s. This transcript is lightly edited for clarity and partially redacted. Unedited remarks are available in the embedded audio recording and can be located with the aid of timestamps bracketed in the transcript text. Portions marked as redacted are not available in the audio. Redacted portions may be made available at a later time. Interviewer questions and remarks are presented in bold. Interview Transcript Just to get started, why don’t you talk a little bit about how you became interested in the post-Soviet space in general? I can’t say that I ever had a vision that I would be doing this stuff.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REFORMS of the NINETIES in ARGENTINA Rodolfo Díaz
    The Reforms of the Nineties in Argentina By Rodolfo Diaz WCFIA Fellow - Harvard University THE REFORMS OF THE NINETIES IN ARGENTINA Rodolfo Díaz WCFIA Fellow Harvard University This book is published under the auspices of the Weatherhead Center For International Affairs of Harvard University 2 The Reforms of the Nineties in Argentina By Rodolfo Diaz WCFIA Fellow - Harvard University CONTENTS Introduction THE STARTING POINT (7) 1. The State: the "Bureaucratic Authoritarian Model".2. The Econ- omy: the "Assisted Capitalism". 3. The Means: Inflation. 4. The Ends: Transfers to the Private Sector. 5. The Starting Point: The Collapse of Assisted Capitalism Chapter I: Reforming the Economy I. ECONOMIC REFORM (33) 1. The Collapse of 1989. 2. The "Plan BB”. 3. Contents of the New Law. 4. The Approval. 5. Solutions to Problems. 6. Complementary Measures. 7. Enforcement of Economic Reform. 8. Information flows. 9. Effects. 10. Measuring the Reforms. 11. Two "Paces". II. MONETARY REFORM (61) 1. Crisis and Hyperinflation. 2. The Proposal. 3. Contents of the "Convertibility Law". 4. The Approval. 5. Implementation. 6. The "Impossible Trinity". 7. The Enforcement of Convertibility. 8. The Fixed Exchange Rate. 10. Effects. 11. Inflationary Effects of De- valuation. 12. Elimination of Devaluation as Monetary Policy In- strument. III. FISCAL REFORM (85) 1. Inflation: The Tax of Assisted Capitalism. 2. Fiscal Situation in 1989. 3. The Proposal. 4. Approval: Defeat and Debate. 5. The Contents of Law 24073. 6. Enforcement and Tax Collection. 7. Public Expenditure and Fiscal Deficit. 8. Budgetary Institutions. 9. The Fiscal Solvency Law. Chapter II: Reforming the Society I. EDUCATIONAL REFORM (117) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Still Untrodden Heights: Global Imperatives for Space Exploration in the 21St Century
    1 The Still Untrodden Heights: Global Imperatives for Space Exploration in the 21st Century CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 1 The Still Untrodden Heights: Global Imperatives for Space Exploration in the 21st Century About the Center for Strategic and International Studies For four decades, the Center for Strategic and International Studies has been dedicated to providing world leaders with strategic insights on—and policy solutions to—current and emerging global issues. The CSIS team of 190 researchers and support staff focus primarily on three subject areas. First, we address the full spectrum of new challenges to national and international security. Second, we maintain resident experts on all of the world's major geographical regions. Third, we are committed to helping to develop new methods of governance for the global age; to this end, CSIS has programs on technology and public policy, international trade and finance, and energy. A private, nonpartisan institution, CSIS is headquartered in Washington, D.C. CSIS is led by Dr. John J. Hamre, formerly deputy secretary of defense, who has been president and CEO since April 2000. We are also guided by a board of trustees chaired by former senator Sam Nunn and consisting of prominent individuals from both the public and private sectors. About the Human Space Exploration Initiative The Human Space Exploration Initiative (HSEI) is a project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies that is examining the uncertain future of human space exploration. The purpose of this initiative is to explore new international perspectives on the future of human presence in space, assess their relative prospects, and build a new common global vision and agenda for the future of human space exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-Pipeline (TAP- Pipeline)
    Die Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-Pipeline (TAP- Pipeline) - - Ausarbeitung - © 2008 Deutscher Bundestag WD 1 - 037/08 Wissenschaftliche Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages Verfasser/in: Die Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-Pipeline (TAP-Pipeline) Ausarbeitung WD 1 - 037/08 Abschluss der Arbeit: 14.04.2008 Fachbereich WD 1: Geschichte, Zeitgeschichte und Politik Telefon: Ausarbeitungen und andere Informationsangebote der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste geben nicht die Auffassung des Deutschen Bundestages, eines seiner Organe oder der Bundestagsverwaltung wieder. Vielmehr liegen sie in der fachlichen Verantwortung der Verfasserinnen und Verfasser sowie der Fachbereichsleitung. Die Arbeiten der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste sind dazu bestimmt, Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages bei der Wahrnehmung des Mandats zu unterstützen. Der Deutsche Bundestag behält sich die Rechte der Veröffentlichung und Verbreitung vor. Diese bedürfen der Zustimmung des Direktors beim Deutschen Bundestag. - 3 - Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite 1. Einleitung 4 2. Turkmenistan als Öl- und Erdgasproduzent 5 3. Die Entwicklung bei der TAP-Pipeline von 1994 bis 1998 5 4. Die Entwicklung bei der TAP-Pipeline von 1998 bis 2002 10 5. Die Entwicklung bei der TAP-Pipeline seit 2002 10 6. Zusammenfassung 12 7. Literaturverzeichnis 17 - 4 - 1. Einleitung Der Bau von Pipelines zum Transport von Erdgas oder Erdöl erfordert erfahrungsgemäß einen längeren zeitlichen Vorlauf, da von der Grundkonzeption über die vertragliche Festlegung bis hin zur Aufnahme des tatsächlichen Betriebes in der Regel mehrere Jahre vergehen. Da die Pipelines sich gewöhnlich über größere Entfernungen erstrecken, sind Investitionen in Milliardenhöhe keine Ausnahme. Aus diesem Grund schließen sich zum Bau und Vertrieb von Pipelines häufig verschiedene Firmen1 zu einem gemeinsa- men Konsortium zusammen.2 Doch Pipelines spielen nicht nur eine ökonomische Rolle.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran in a Reconnecting Eurasia: Foreign Economic And
    COVER PHOTO HEMNIK/ADOBE STOCK APRIL 2016 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 Iran in a 202 887 0200 | www.csis.org Reconnecting Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Lanham, MD 20706 301 459 3366 | www.rowman.com Eurasia Foreign Economic and Security Interests AUTHOR Mohsen Milani EDITOR Jeffrey Mankoff A Report of the ISBN 978-1-4422-5936-2 CSIS RUSSIA AND EURASIA PROGRAM 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington,Ë|xHSLEOCy259362z DC 20036v*:+:!:+:! 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org Blank APRIL 2016 Iran in a Reconnecting Eurasia Foreign Economic and Security Interests AUTHOR EDITOR Mohsen Milani Jeffrey Mankoff Eurasia from the Outside In A REPORT OF THE CSIS RUS SIA AND EURASIA PROGRAM Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 594-65044_ch00_4P.indd 1 4/19/16 12:43 PM About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organ ization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full- time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analy sis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkmenistan: a Model Kleptocracy
    Turkmenistan: A Model Kleptocracy Report by Crude Accountability June 2021 1 Published by: Crude Accountability Copyright © 2021 Crude Accountability This report may be quoted from or copied as long as the source/authors are acknowledged. Crude Accountability assumes full responsibility for the contents of the report. While we have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information presented in the report, we cannot be held liable for any errors, omissions or inconsistencies. Copies of this report are available on crudeaccountability.org Turkmenistan: A Model Kleptocracy Crude Accountability 2 Table of Contents Foreword 05 Key Findings 06 Introduction 07 Chapter 1. The Hidden Economy of Turkmenistan 11 Chapter 2. The Worst Place in the World to Do Business 40 Chapter 3. Turkmenistan Incorporated: The President’s Family 69 Chapter 4. Imprisoned Government Officials and Their Crimes 102 Conclusion 113 Turkmenistan: A Model Kleptocracy Crude Accountability 3 Crude Accountability is an environmental and human rights Who We nonprofit organization that works with communities in the Caspian and Black Sea regions who battle threats to local Are natural resources and the negative impacts on their health. Crude Accountability works on the local, national, regional, What We and international levels in partnership with active communities and organizations committed to a just and Do environmentally sustainable world. Since 2013, Crude Accountability has been a founding Prove member of the Prove They Are Alive! campaign. The campaign works to protect the rights of a large number of detainees serving long-term sentences in Turkmen Campaign prisons, about whom no information is available since their sentencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookings Corrected 041904.Qxd
    Global Governance Initiative Annual Report 2004 Global Governance Initiative Annual Report 2004 The views expressed in the articles in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Economic Forum. © 2004 World Economic Forum ISBN 0-9741108-3-3 Designed, edited and produced by Communications Development Incorporated, Washington, D.C., with Grundy Northedge, London Global Governance Initiative Developed in partnership with Expert group chairs and members Peace and security Mahmoud Fathalla, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chair: Gareth Evans, President, International Crisis Group (Australia) Assiut University (Egypt) Ellen Laipson, President, Henry L. Stimson Center (USA) Cesar Victora, Professor of Epidemiology, Federal University of Mohamed Sahnoun, Special Representative of the UN Pelotas (Brazil) Secretary-General for the Sudan (Algeria) Rick Steketee, Chief, Malaria Epidemiology Branch, Centers for Andrew Mack, Director, Human Security Centre, University of Disease Control and Prevention (USA) British Columbia (Australia) Tom Coates, Professor of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School Jane Nelson, Director, Business Leadership and Strategy, Prince of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (USA) of Wales International Business Leaders Forum, and Fellow, Center for Business and Government, Harvard University (UK) Ramesh Thakur, Senior Vice Rector for Peace and Governance, Human rights United Nations University (India) Chair: Robert Archer, Executive Director, International Council on Human Rights
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia in a Reconnecting Eurasia: Turkmenistan's Evolving Foreign Economic and Security Interests
    JUNE 2015 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 Central Asia in a 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org Reconnecting Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Eurasia Lanham, MD 20706 301- 459- 3366 | www.rowman.com Turkmenistan’s Evolving Foreign Economic and Security Interests AUTHORS Andrew C. Kuchins ISBN 978-1-4422-4098-8 Jeffrey Mankoff Ë|xHSLEOCy240988z v*:+:!:+:! Oliver Backes A Report of the CSIS Russia and Eurasia Program Cover photo: Velirina / Shutterstock.com. Blank Central Asia in a Reconnecting Eurasia Turkmenistan’s Evolving Foreign Economic and Security Interests AUTHORS Andrew C. Kuchins Jeffrey Mankoff Oliver Backes A Report of the CSIS Rus sia and Eurasia Program June 2015 Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 594-61683_ch00_3P.indd 1 5/7/15 10:12 AM hn hk io il sy SY eh ek About CSIS hn hk io il sy SY eh ek For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked hn hk io il sy SY eh ek to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are hn hk io il sy SY eh ek providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart hn hk io il sy SY eh ek a course toward a better world. hn hk io il sy SY eh ek CSIS is a nonprofit or ga ni za tion headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full- time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analy sis and hn hk io il sy SY eh ek develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkmenistan, Iran, Russia and Afghanistan
    geopolitics of gas working paper series INTERNATIONAL GAS TRADE IN CENTRAL ASIA: TURKMENISTAN, IRAN, RUSSIA AND AFGHANISTAN martha brill olcott International Gas Trade in Central Asia: Turkmenistan, Iran, Russia and Afghanistan Martha Brill Olcott Working Paper #28 May 2004 Prepared for the Geopolitics of Natural Gas Study, a joint project of the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development at Stanford University and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University. About the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development The Program on Energy and Sustainable Development at Stanford University is an interdisciplinary research program focused on the economic and environmental consequences of global energy consumption. Its studies examine the development of global natural gas markets, reform of electric power markets, and how the availability of modern energy services, such as electricity, can affect the process of economic growth in the world’s poorest regions. The Program also works on legal and regulatory issues surrounding the development of an effective international regime to address the issues of global climate change. The Program, established in September 2001, includes a global network of scholars—based at centers of excellence on six continents—in law, political science, economics and engineering. The Program is part of the Center for Environmental Science and Policy at the Stanford Institute for International Studies. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development At the Center for Environmental Science and Policy Stanford Institute for International Studies Encina Hall East, Room 415 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6055 http://pesd.stanford.edu [email protected] About the Energy Forum at the James A.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H1251
    March 10, 2010 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H1251 NOT VOTING—14 Authorization for Use of Military make a case for the logistics of with- Barrett (SC) Davis (AL) Roskam Force is being interpreted as carte drawal. Bartlett Deal (GA) Schakowsky blanche for circumventing Congress’ After 81⁄2 years, it is time that we Boswell Hoekstra Wamp role as a coequal branch of govern- have this debate. Camp Matsui Young (FL) Conyers Peterson ment. I reserve the balance of my time. My legislation invokes the War Pow- Mr. BERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise in ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE ers Resolution of 1973. If enacted, it opposition to the resolution, and I The SPEAKER pro tempore (during would require the President to with- yield myself 4 minutes. the vote). Members have 2 minutes re- draw U.S. Armed Forces from Afghani- Mr. Speaker, first of all, I want to maining in this vote. stan by December 31, 2010. say I have quite enjoyed working with b 1409 The debate today will be the first op- the gentleman from Ohio on this issue and a number of the issues we have had So (two-thirds being in the affirma- portunity we have had to revisit the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military dealings with since I have become tive) the rules were suspended and the chairman, and I fundamentally agree bill, as amended, was passed. Force, which the House supported fol- lowing the worst terrorist attack in with him and other supporters of the The result of the vote was announced resolution that it is right for the House as above recorded.
    [Show full text]