Armenia in a Reconnecting Eurasia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Armenia in a Reconnecting Eurasia COVER PHOTO TIKO ARAMYAN/ADOBE STOCK JUNE 2016 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Armenia in a Washington, DC 20036 202 887 0200 | www.csis.org Reconnecting Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Lanham, MD 20706 301 459 3366 | www.rowman.com Eurasia Foreign Economic and Security Interests AUTHORS Andrew C. Kuchins Jeffrey Mankoff Oliver Backes A Report of the ISBN 978-1-4422-5940-9 CSIS RUSSIA AND EURASIA PROGRAM 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington,Ë|xHSLEOCy259409z DC 20036v*:+:!:+:! 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org Blank JUNE 2016 Armenia in a Reconnecting Eurasia Foreign Economic and Security Interests AUTHORS Andrew C. Kuchins Jeffrey Mankoff Oliver Backes The South Caucasus in a Reconnecting Eurasia A REPORT OF THE CSIS RUS SIA AND EURASIA PROGRAM Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 594-65704_ch00_3P.indd 1 06/18/16 4:59 am About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. T oday, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organ ization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full- time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analy sis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Thomas J. Pritzker was named chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in November 2015. Former U.S. deputy secretary of defense John J. Hamre has served as the Center’s president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2016 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-4422-5940-9 (pb); 978-1-4422-5941-6 (eBook) Center for Strategic & International Studies Rowman & Littlefield 1616 Rhode Island Ave nue, NW 4501 Forbes Boulevard Washington, DC 20036 Lanham, MD 20706 202-887-0200 | www . csis . org 301 - 459 - 3366 | www . rowman . com 594-65704_ch00_3P.indd 2 06/18/16 4:59 am Contents iv Preface vi Acknowl edgments 1 CHAPTER 1 | The View from Yerevan 4 CHAPTER 2 | Armenia’s Foreign and Security Policy 22 CHAPTER 3 | Armenia in a Reconnecting Eurasia 42 CHAPTER 4 | Conclusion 44 About the Authors III 594-65704_ch00_3P.indd 3 06/18/16 4:59 am Preface In January 2014, the CSIS Rus sia and Eurasia Program launched its Eurasia Initiative. The vast Eurasian landmass, stretching from China in the east to Eu rope in the west and from the Arctic Ocean in the north to the Indian Ocean in the south, includes some of the world’s most power ful and dynamic states, as well as some of the world’s most intractable challenges. Scholars and analysts are accustomed to focusing on Eurasia’s vari ous regions— Europe, the former Soviet Union, East Asia, South Asia, and Southeast Asia— rather than on the interactions between them. The goal of this initiative is to focus on these interactions, while analyzing and understanding Eurasia in a comprehensive way. Today, more than any time since the collapse of the Silk Road five centuries ago, understanding these individual regions is impossible without also understanding the interactions among them. Over the past two de cades, Eurasia has begun to slowly reconnect, with the emergence of new trade relationships and transit infrastructures, as well as the integration of Rus sia, China, and India into the global economy. Even as this reconnection is u nder way, the center of economic dyna- mism in Eurasia, and in the world as a whole, continues shifting to the East. The impact of t hese shifts is potentially enormous, but they remain poorly understood because of intellectual and bureaucratic stovepiping in government and the broader analytic community. The report you are holding in your hands is one of the fruits of the Eurasia Initiative. Following the production of six reports as part of our 2015 series on Central Asia in a Reconnecting Eurasia, the CSIS Rus sia and Eurasia Program is now proud to announce the release of the next installment: The South Caucasus in a Reconnecting Eurasia. This four- report series includes detailed analytic reports on the foreign economic and security interests of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, as well as a summary report laying out the challenges and opportunities for U.S. policy in the region. Long an impor tant transit corridor between the western and eastern parts of Eurasia, the South Caucasus continues to face a range of geopo liti cal challenges, exacerbated by tectonic shifts taking place around the region’s borders: the crisis in Ukraine, growing confrontation between Rus sia and Turkey, turmoil in the M iddle East, and reduced appetite for engagement in both the Eu ro pean Union and the United States. IV 594-65704_ch00_3P.indd 4 06/18/16 4:59 am To better understand the geopo liti cal and geoeconomic environment confronting the South Caucasus states, starting in 2014, members of the CSIS Rus sia and Eurasia Program traveled to the region and conducted interviews with a wide range of government officials, experts, private- sector actors, and representatives of international organ izations to understand how elites in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia perceive the economic and security environment changing around them. This report and the others in the series reflect what we gleaned from these interviews, along with analy sis of published data and secondary lit er a ture, to provide a broad overview of how the world looks from the perspective of the South Caucasus. As in our earlier report series on Central Asia, the emphasis in t hese reports is the foreign economic and security policies of the three states. While we are cognizant of the complex situation surrounding domestic politics and h uman rights in some of these countries, the focus of this par tic u lar proj ect is the strategic implications of a reconnecting Eurasia—in other words, how the states of the South Caucasus interact with each other and with the outside world. We address domestic issues, including human rights, corruption, and authoritarian practices, to the extent that they affect the interactions between Armenia, Azer- baijan, and Georgia, on the one hand, and the rest of the world, on the other. The South Caucasus has throughout history been a po liti cal and civilizational fault zone between Eu rope, Turkey, Rus sia, and Persia. Since the Soviet collapse, the South Caucasus states have themselves acquired agency in international politics, even as they remain buffeted by the larger forces swirling around them. For the United States and other Western governments, effective policymaking in the South Caucasus requires a nuanced understanding of the interests, objectives, worries, and levers of influence available to the South Caucasus states. The South Caucasus in a Reconnecting Eurasia report series is designed to give a regional perspective to foreign officials, activists, investors, and others to help them better navigate the complex environment of the South Caucasus. Preface V 594-65704_ch00_3P.indd 5 06/18/16 4:59 am Acknowl edgments We would like to take this opportunity to express our gratitude to the many institutions and indi- viduals who made this report and the others in the series pos si ble. The proj ect would not have been pos si ble without the generous financial support of the Smith Richardson Foundation, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and Carlos Bulgheroni. We are also extremely grateful for program support provided by the Car ne gie Corporation of New York to the CSIS Rus sia and Eurasia Program. Additionally, we are grateful to the many government officials, experts, NGO staff, and private- sector actors who shared their insights with us during research trips to the region and in Washington, DC. Thanks are due as well to the embassies of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia in Washington, whose staff helped facilitate our travel to their respective countries, and in par tic u lar to Ambassadors Tigran Sargsyan (Armenia), Elin Suleymanov (Azerbai- jan), and Archil Gegishidze (Georgia). The assistance of Hrachia Tashchian at the Embassy of Armenia, Mammad Talibov at the Embassy of Azerbaijan, and Tinatin Mikiashvili and Giorgi Khelashvili at the Embassy of Georgia is also worthy of special thanks. We also owe a debt of gratitude to the reviewers who read and provided feedback on drafts of the reports in this series. These include Ambassador William Courtney, Rosemarie Forsythe, Richard Giragosian, Ambassador Batu Kutelia, Ambassador Richard Morningstar, Wayne Merry, and Sufian Zhemukhov. Fi nally, we would also like to extend our thanks to the many current and former members of the CSIS Rus sia and Eurasia Program who contributed to the proj ect in vari ous ways: Program Coordinator Sung In Marshall, as well as interns Fuad Abdul, Yulia Danilina, Jacob Gladysz, Yana Gololobova, Eric Griffith, Kendra Harkins, Vlad Kondratiuk, Peter Krivicich, Allen Maggard, Brina Malachowski, Daniel Mark, Kirill Prudnikov, Dylan Royce, Narek Sevacheryan, Jason Siler, and Nic Wondra. A special note of thanks goes to Aizhan Kul- Mukhammed, without whose tireless organ ization and management this proj ect would never have happened.
Recommended publications
  • The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia
    30312 Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia: Addressing Gaps in Service Delivery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure and Energy Services Department Europe and Central Asia Region 1st September 2004 FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 Disclaimer: This paper is published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with minimum delay. The typescript of this paper, therefore, has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. © 2004 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), The World Bank. ii FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 CONTENTS Abbreviations And Acronyms vi Acknowledgments vii Overview and Summary of Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 Why did we do this Study?........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • REPSOL YPF Argentina
    Buenos Aires, 2000 XI REPSOL YPF-HARVARD SEMINAR HARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA DECEMBER 2000 ENERGY POLICIES AND MARKETS: NEW TRENDS OR OLD CYCLES? WILLIAM W. HOGAN BIJAN MOSSAVAR-RAHMANI EDITORS THE REPSOL YPF-HARVARD SEMINAR SERIES JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT HARVARD UNIVERSITY 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 USA REPSOL YPF Paseo de la Castellana 278 28046 Madrid, Spain FUNDACIÓN REPSOL Juan Bravo 3B 28006 Madrid, Spain ISBN: [TO BE ADDED] Depósito legal: [to be added] Copyright 2001© FUNDACIÓN REPSOL Servicio de Publicaciones CONTENTS FOREWORD ........................................................................................v EDITORS’ NOTE .................................................................................ix OPENING SESSION WELCOME MR. ALFONSO CORTINA ........................................................3 «ARGENTINA’S ECONOMY IN THE NEW CENTURY» THE HONORABLE JOSÉ LUIS MACHINEA ...................................11 KEYNOTE ADDRESS «LIBERALIZATION AND THE ECONOMY IN LATIN AMERICA» THE HONORABLE DOMINGO F. C AVALLO .................................17 SESSION I OIL INTRODUCTORY REMARKS MR. BIJAN MOSSAVAR-RAHMANI ..........................................29 «PERSPECTIVES ON THE INTERNATIONAL OIL MARKET» MR. ADRIÁN LAJOUS ..........................................................33 «POLITICS AND OIL» MR. RICHARD PERLE...........................................................43 «FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS ON THE PRICE OF OIL» THE HONORABLE HUMBERTO CALDERÓN
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives
    WIND ENERGY IN ARMENIA: OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 MARCH 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by PA Government Services Inc. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 March 2010 © PA Consulting Group 2010 Prepared for: United States Agency for PA Government Services Inc. International Development 4601 N. Fairfax Drive Armenia Mission Suite 600 1 American Ave. Arlington, VA 22203 Yerevan 0082 Armenia Prepared by: PA Government Services Inc. Tel: +1 571 227 9000 Fax: +1 571 227 9001 www.paconsulting.com Version: 1.0 Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of potential and development perspectives. March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary 1-1 2. Introduction 2-1 2.1 International Trends 2-1 2.2 State of the energy sector in Armenia 2-3 3. Wind Studies 3-1 4. Wind Measurements 4-1 5. Wind Energy Potential 5-1 6. Development perspectives 6-1 6.1 Technical limitations 6-1 6.2 Perspective Sites 6-3 6.3 Grid Interconnection 6-8 6.4 Economic Limitations 6-11 7.
    [Show full text]
  • BP's Fracking Secrets: Pan American Energy And
    BP’s fracking secrets Pan-American Energy and Argentina’s shale mega-project November 2017 This report was researched and written by Anna Markova (Platform) with input from Hernán Scandizzo BP does not carry out and Diego Di Risio (OPSur). Thanks also to Ariana Ortega and Martín Alvarez (OPSur), Mika Minio- Paluello and Sarah Shoraka (Platform) and Paul fracking in its home Horsman (Greenpeace). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons country, the UK, Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) licence. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes, on the condition because “it would that you attribute the source. License terms: https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ attract the wrong kind of attention” Platform is a London-based organisation that conducts research, education, and campaigns towards a just future beyond fossil fuels. UK company limited by guarantee no. 2658515, registered charity no. 1044485. [email protected] +44 (0)20 7749 1109 Contents Summary 3 Observatorio Petrolero Sur conducts research, 1 BP and Pan-American Energy 4 communications, and intervenes in public policy for a just transition towards a sustainable society 2 What is Vaca Muerta? 8 and energy system. [email protected] +54 (011) 4373-6304 – Buenos Aires 3 Who is BP? 10 +54 (0299) 15 586-4313 – Neuquén 4 Pan-American Energy’s dossier 12 5 The bet on extreme gas 14 Addendum Pan-American Energy in other countries 18 This publication has been produced with the financial Endnotes 19 assistance of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-9/11 American Invasion of Afghanistan: Reasons and Motivations
    Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research idi University-Oum El Bouaghi Faculty of Letters and Languages Department of English Post-9/11 American Invasion of Afghanistan: Reasons and Motivations A Mémoire Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Anglo-American Studies By: BECHEKAOUI Youcef Board of Examiners: Dr. MAAMERI Fatima, Supervisor BOUDJLIT Amina, member 2016-2017 Abstract The reasons and motivations that led Unites States of America to invade Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks made a hot debate among many historians and politicians. Thus, this study is significant because it sheds light on the main embedded aims that the United States of America never stated behind its invasion in the aftermath of the 9/11 events. Although the United States of America claimed that the fundamental reason behind the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 is the 9/11 attacks, there are many other reasons that were overlooked. Afghanistan has a very important geo-strategic location in the world; thereby, this feature allows the United States government to accomplish its economic and political interests within Afghanistan and Central Asia. This study has come to the conclusion that the United States of America used 9/11 attacks as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and serve its imperialistic interests in the area. Keywords: Unites States, Afghanistan, 9/11 attacks, invasion of Afghanistan, economic and political interests, pretext Résumé Les raisons et motivations qui mènent les É tats-Unis D Amérique à envahir juste après les attentats du 11 septembre, a éveillé un débat chaleureux au sein des historiens et politiciens.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive
    Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive Interviewee: James C. Langdon, Jr. Interviewer: Rebecca Adeline Johnston Date: July 2, 2018 Location: Austin, TX Abstract James Calhoun Langdon, Jr. is Partner Emeritus at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP. A leading legal specialist in the energy sector, he has represented governments and oil and gas companies in the United States, Latin America, Europe, and numerous countries of the former Soviet Union. His government service has included positions at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Federal Energy Administration, and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, which he chaired in 2005. He is a co-creator and founding board member of the Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law and an alum of the University of Texas-Austin as well as its School of Law. This interview provides an overview of Mr. Langdon’s experience working in Azerbaijan, Russia, and Kazakhstan throughout the 1990s. This transcript is lightly edited for clarity and partially redacted. Unedited remarks are available in the embedded audio recording and can be located with the aid of timestamps bracketed in the transcript text. Portions marked as redacted are not available in the audio. Redacted portions may be made available at a later time. Interviewer questions and remarks are presented in bold. Interview Transcript Just to get started, why don’t you talk a little bit about how you became interested in the post-Soviet space in general? I can’t say that I ever had a vision that I would be doing this stuff.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Ice: the Role of Civil
    The failure of the 2009 Protocols to establish and develop diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey has largely overshadowed the success of civil society organizations in advancing the normalization process over the past decade. This report aims to help address this imbalance through a detailed account Breaking the Ice: of the United States Department of State-funded “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” project, implemented by the Global Political Trends Center (GPoT) of Istanbul Kültür University, Internews Network, Internews Armenia, the Yerevan Press Club and CAM Film between September 2010 and December 2011. The Role of Civil Society and Media in Including an introduction that analyzes the current “frozen” state and historical background of Turkish- Armenian relations, Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations presents the writings and reflections of the dozens of Turkish and Armenian journalists and students who participated in the project. The output of the Dialogue-Building Project demonstrates the continued, if not Turkey-Armenia Relations heightened, importance of civil society and media-based initiatives in the Turkey-Armenia normalization process, post-Protocols. Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan Since its founding in 2008, GPoT Center has played an active role in rapprochement and reconciliation projects between Turkey and Armenia through organizing numerous exchanges, roundtable discussions and conferences with the participation of leading Turkish civil society activists, academics, journalists and retired diplomats. For more information on these projects and GPoT Center, please visit www.gpotcenter.org. ISBN: 978-605-4233-80-9 Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations An Evaluation of the “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” Project Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan April 2012 BREAKING THE ICE: THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOcietY anD MEDia IN TUrkeY-Armenia RELatiOns Istanbul Kültür University Publication No.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Final Aug 31 Formatted
    Identity Gerrymandering: How the Armenian State Constructs and Controls “Its” Diaspora by Kristin Talinn Rebecca Cavoukian A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Kristin Cavoukian 2016 Identity Gerrymandering: How the Armenian State Constructs and Controls “Its” Diaspora Kristin Talinn Rebecca Cavoukian Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2016 Abstract This dissertation examines the Republic of Armenia (RA) and its elites’ attempts to reframe state-diaspora relations in ways that served state interests. After 17 years of relatively rocky relations, in 2008, a new Ministry of Diaspora was created that offered little in the way of policy output. Instead, it engaged in “identity gerrymandering,” broadening the category of diaspora from its accepted reference to post-1915 genocide refugees and their descendants, to include Armenians living throughout the post-Soviet region who had never identified as such. This diluted the pool of critical, oppositional diasporans with culturally closer and more compliant emigrants. The new ministry also favoured geographically based, hierarchical diaspora organizations, and “quiet” strategies of dissent. Since these were ultimately attempts to define membership in the nation, and informal, affective ties to the state, the Ministry of Diaspora acted as a “discursive power ministry,” with boundary-defining and maintenance functions reminiscent of the physical border policing functions of traditional power ministries. These efforts were directed at three different “diasporas:” the Armenians of Russia, whom RA elites wished to mold into the new “model” diaspora, the Armenians of Georgia, whose indigeneity claims they sought to discourage, and the “established” western diaspora, whose contentious public ii critique they sought to disarm.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Soon After Armenia's Independence In
    WT/TPR/S/228 Trade Policy Review Page 56 VI. TRADE POLICIES BY SECTOR (1) AGRICULTURE 1. Soon after Armenia's independence in September 1991, 864 collective and state farms were privatized and about 321,000 private farms created.1 By 2006 the number of private farms had increased to about 340,000, as more public land was privatized by open tender. Farms are not only small in size (the average is about 1.4 ha), they are also fragmented, with about 1,200,000 parcels of land shared among the 340,000 farms. The size varies considerably from 0.62 ha in the irrigated Ararat Marz to 3.8 ha in the extensive crop and livestock raising Syunik Marz. If agriculture is to develop further, farms and holdings will need to be consolidated in order to achieve economies of scale. A major impediment to consolidation and a functioning land market was poor registration of land parcels and the issuance of titles. During the review period, a project sponsored by the World Bank and supported by other donors has greatly improved this situation, and most land parcels have now been surveyed and registered, and titles have been issued.2 2. Agriculture contributed an average of 18.8% to Armenia's GDP during 2004-08, and made up about 46% of employment (Chapter I(1)). However, in addition to the problems associated with farm structure, the growth and competitiveness of the sector is restricted by various topographic and climatic factors; for example, most of the land is at an altitude of over 1,000 metres; and over two thirds is on slopes of 6º or more.
    [Show full text]