Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive Post-Soviet States: People, Power, and Assets Oral History Archive Interviewee: James C. Langdon, Jr. Interviewer: Rebecca Adeline Johnston Date: July 2, 2018 Location: Austin, TX Abstract James Calhoun Langdon, Jr. is Partner Emeritus at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP. A leading legal specialist in the energy sector, he has represented governments and oil and gas companies in the United States, Latin America, Europe, and numerous countries of the former Soviet Union. His government service has included positions at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Federal Energy Administration, and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, which he chaired in 2005. He is a co-creator and founding board member of the Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law and an alum of the University of Texas-Austin as well as its School of Law. This interview provides an overview of Mr. Langdon’s experience working in Azerbaijan, Russia, and Kazakhstan throughout the 1990s. This transcript is lightly edited for clarity and partially redacted. Unedited remarks are available in the embedded audio recording and can be located with the aid of timestamps bracketed in the transcript text. Portions marked as redacted are not available in the audio. Redacted portions may be made available at a later time. Interviewer questions and remarks are presented in bold. Interview Transcript Just to get started, why don’t you talk a little bit about how you became interested in the post-Soviet space in general? I can’t say that I ever had a vision that I would be doing this stuff. My expertise and my experience has all been just in the energy sphere. That meant wherever there was something that was an oil and gas matter, that was of interest to me. I knew nothing about Russia, really, I mean hardly anything. I think at the time we had two guys in our Houston office that had done some international stuff, probably a decent amount, Todd Gremillion and Jack Langlois. They had been in our firm for a very long time and they knew the [BP] guys, kind of. [BP] had an interest in one or more of the fields in Azerbaijan, the Gunashli [oil]field. I think there was a consortium of companies that were British Gas, [BP]; I can’t remember who else. Agip, maybe; an Italian company. Two or three more. [BP's international guy was Rondo Fehlberg,] he was a friend of Todd’s and Jack’s, from Houston. He’s long since gone from [BP] and became the athletic director at Brigham Young [University] or some place. He’s had an interesting career. He’s a really good guy. This [BP] fellow had pretty much been living in Baku trying to sort this thing out, and rapidly came to the conclusion that, “Look, we’ll never get a deal done that will meet international standards without SOCAR [State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic]”—the state-owned oil company of Azerbaijan—“having legal representation. We need to get somebody to represent them, and the other international companies will support that.” [BP] called me and said, “What do you think, would you guys, Jack, Todd, would the firm do this?” And I said, “I don’t know why not, let’s try it.” Then the three of us began making these trips to Baku. Then our ethics people went through a process where they confirmed that it is possible for a lawyer to represent another party and then have the opposing party pay your legal expenses. But you have to maintain a wall; you have to do this; you have to do that. And you can’t submit bills to them that would detail exactly what you’re doing. There was a lot of stuff we had to do. We worked that out and our ethics council signed off on it. So we represented SOCAR with [BP] and, I think, the rest of that consortium paying our legal bills. We spent a lot of time there, and you didn’t have to be there a long time before that culture began to impact you, and before you began to understand that this was a very interesting historical place. It was the Silk Road. That’s what this was. And it was a very complicated place. The [BP] guy once said, “At [BP], we try to hire people that can do two things at one time, maybe three things at one time. There’s no one in this society that can’t do fifteen things at one time.” These people are smart, bright, and just a cab driver on the street has got to be thinking in three dimensions just to get through his day. And everybody has to live like that. Fifty percent of the heritage of Azerbaijan is out of Iran. It was a fascinating place to watch the way people struggled with their life. Azerbaijan was run by, for lack of a better term, about six big families, or clans. There was a flower clan. [0:05:00] Azerbaijan grew flowers that they sent all through Europe and every other place, and those people had a monopoly on all that. All the distribution to Europe, to Russia, to everywhere. And then there was an oil clan. And then there were other clans. And they were responsible for paying all the employees in their area. They, in turn, made a lot of money doing all that. It was pretty interesting to figure out who actually is going to sign these contracts for oil and gas things—some non-elected person that runs a clan that actually controls it? There were tons of legal challenges. And we met with the president from time to time President [Heydar Alirza oglu] Aliyev, and his son, now.1 His son in those days spent a lot of his time gambling in Turkey, and he was a playboy, twenty years old, living the life or whatever. Anyway, when we were in town, they took care of us. And somebody from the president’s entourage would pick us up at the airport, have a guarded escort back into town, some place where we’d stay. That’s how I got interested in all this. James C. Langdon, Jr., interview by Rebecca Adeline Johnston, July 2, 2018, transcript, Post-Soviet States Oral History 2 Collection, Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law, Austin, TX, available online at: https://www.strausscenter.org/interview/james-langdon You may remember that in those days that the conflict in the Nagorno-Karabakh was going full blast. To even get to Baku you flew to Istanbul, and then you got on some Turkish airway. It’s just a little jump over to Baku, but you couldn’t go over Nagorno-Karabakh. You would have to fly down the length of the Black Sea, six or seven hundred miles, then cross over to the coast of the Caspian [Sea], and then go back up to Baku. What would have been a short flight was three times longer. And then you would land and there were no lights at the airport and everybody on the plane looked like a terrorist. You’re the only person that didn’t. Although, I soon learned to look like a terrorist too. You get off the plane, there were no lights at the airport, there was no BA [British Airways] counter, there was no known Western airline there. And you walk through a darkened terminal and if you didn’t have somebody to pick you up, cab people in the street would pick you up. You just get in somebody’s car. Those were very, very interesting days. We stayed at some old KGB housing, in an apartment. It was a big three-story apartment that looked out over the Caspian. It was beautiful in one sense, but it was completely dilapidated in another. And it was questionable whether the elevator was ever going to work or not. If you had an earthquake, that whole thing had a good chance of tumbling down. One of the bankers we began working with at some point was there, they were with Credit Suisse [Group AG] I think. I said, “You know, if you just imagine what it was, this place is as beautiful as Paris, it’s like Paris. Paris left to rot for seventy years.” And that was a pretty good description of what it was, at that time. We’re talking the early ‘90s. Today it’s a modern American city. Anyway, that’s how we got started. Every aspect of what you did had the romance and all that stuff. We were doing all of that about the time that [Robert S.] Strauss was appointed to be ambassador to the Soviet Union. We were already in Baku when that happened, in the last years of the Bush 41 administration. And before he could get there—he’d already had his confirmation hearings and all that, but had not yet left, and then the wall fell.2 Then he had to go back and do it all again because he was now going to be the ambassador to Russia. And then when Strauss left, the first thing he said to us is, “I know you guys are going to try to be selling me by the pound, but do not come over here and try to practice law, okay? I don’t want to have to deal with some congressional investigation because you guys are trying to make money when I’m ambassador.” We absolutely paid no attention [0:10:00] to that, needless to say.
Recommended publications
  • The Killing of William Browder
    THE KILLING OF WILLIAM BROWDER THE KILLING OF WILLIAM BROWDER Bill Browder, the fa lse crusader for justice and human rights and the self - styled No. 1 enemy of Vladimir Putin has perpetrated a brazen and dangerous deception upon the Weste rn world. This book traces the anatomy of this deception, unmasking the powerful forces that are pushing the West ern world toward yet another great war with Russia. ALEX KRAINER EQUILIBRIUM MONACO First published in Monaco in 20 17 Copyright © 201 7 by Alex Krainer ISBN 978 - 2 - 9556923 - 2 - 5 Material contained in this book may be reproduced with permission from its author and/or publisher, except for attributed brief quotations Cover page design, content editing a nd copy editing by Alex Krainer. Set in Times New Roman, book title in Imprint MT shadow To the people of Russia and the United States wh o together, hold the keys to the future of humanity. Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like the evil spirits at the dawn of day. Thomas Jefferson Table of Contents 1. Bill Browder and I ................................ ................................ ............... 1 Browder’s 2005 presentation in Monaco ................................ .............. 2 Harvard club presentation in 2010 ................................ ........................ 3 Ru ssophobia and Putin - bashing in the West ................................ ......... 4 Red notice ................................ ................................ ............................ 6 Reading
    [Show full text]
  • REPSOL YPF Argentina
    Buenos Aires, 2000 XI REPSOL YPF-HARVARD SEMINAR HARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA DECEMBER 2000 ENERGY POLICIES AND MARKETS: NEW TRENDS OR OLD CYCLES? WILLIAM W. HOGAN BIJAN MOSSAVAR-RAHMANI EDITORS THE REPSOL YPF-HARVARD SEMINAR SERIES JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT HARVARD UNIVERSITY 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 USA REPSOL YPF Paseo de la Castellana 278 28046 Madrid, Spain FUNDACIÓN REPSOL Juan Bravo 3B 28006 Madrid, Spain ISBN: [TO BE ADDED] Depósito legal: [to be added] Copyright 2001© FUNDACIÓN REPSOL Servicio de Publicaciones CONTENTS FOREWORD ........................................................................................v EDITORS’ NOTE .................................................................................ix OPENING SESSION WELCOME MR. ALFONSO CORTINA ........................................................3 «ARGENTINA’S ECONOMY IN THE NEW CENTURY» THE HONORABLE JOSÉ LUIS MACHINEA ...................................11 KEYNOTE ADDRESS «LIBERALIZATION AND THE ECONOMY IN LATIN AMERICA» THE HONORABLE DOMINGO F. C AVALLO .................................17 SESSION I OIL INTRODUCTORY REMARKS MR. BIJAN MOSSAVAR-RAHMANI ..........................................29 «PERSPECTIVES ON THE INTERNATIONAL OIL MARKET» MR. ADRIÁN LAJOUS ..........................................................33 «POLITICS AND OIL» MR. RICHARD PERLE...........................................................43 «FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS ON THE PRICE OF OIL» THE HONORABLE HUMBERTO CALDERÓN
    [Show full text]
  • Treisman Silovarchs 9 10 06
    Putin’s Silovarchs Daniel Treisman October 2006, Forthcoming in Orbis, Winter 2007 In the late 1990s, many Russians believed their government had been captured by a small group of business magnates known as “the oligarchs”. The most flamboyant, Boris Berezovsky, claimed in 1996 that seven bankers controlled fifty percent of the Russian economy. Having acquired massive oil and metals enterprises in rigged privatizations, these tycoons exploited Yeltsin’s ill-health to meddle in politics and lobby their interests. Two served briefly in government. Another, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, summed up the conventional wisdom of the time in a 1997 interview: “Politics is the most lucrative field of business in Russia. And it will be that way forever.”1 A decade later, most of the original oligarchs have been tripping over each other in their haste to leave the political stage, jettisoning properties as they go. From exile in London, Berezovsky announced in February he was liquidating his last Russian assets. A 1 Quoted in Andrei Piontkovsky, “Modern-Day Rasputin,” The Moscow Times, 12 November, 1997. fellow media magnate, Vladimir Gusinsky, long ago surrendered his television station to the state-controlled gas company Gazprom and now divides his time between Israel and the US. Khodorkovsky is in a Siberian jail, serving an eight-year sentence for fraud and tax evasion. Roman Abramovich, Berezovsky’s former partner, spends much of his time in London, where he bought the Chelsea soccer club in 2003. Rather than exile him to Siberia, the Kremlin merely insists he serve as governor of the depressed Arctic outpost of Chukotka—a sign Russia’s leaders have a sense of humor, albeit of a dark kind.
    [Show full text]
  • William R. Spiegelberger the Foreign Policy Research Institute Thanks the Carnegie Corporation for Its Support of the Russia Political Economy Project
    Russia Political Economy Project William R. Spiegelberger The Foreign Policy Research Institute thanks the Carnegie Corporation for its support of the Russia Political Economy Project. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Author: William R. Spiegelberger Eurasia Program Leadership Director: Chris Miller Deputy Director: Maia Otarashvili Edited by: Thomas J. Shattuck Designed by: Natalia Kopytnik © 2019 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute April 2019 COVER: Designed by Natalia Kopytnik. Photography: Oleg Deripaska (World Economic Forum); St. Basil’s Cathedral (Adob Stock); Ruble (Adobe Stock); Vladimir Putin (kremlin.ru); Rusal logo (rusal.ru); United States Capitol (Adobe Stock; Viktor Vekselberg (Aleshru/Wikimedia Commons); Alumnium rolls (Adobe Stock); Trade War (Adobe Stock). Our Mission The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. It seeks to educate the public, teach teachers, train students, and offer ideas to advance U.S. national interests based on a nonpartisan, geopolitical perspective that illuminates contemporary international affairs through the lens of history, geography, and culture. Offering Ideas In an increasingly polarized world, we pride ourselves on our tradition of nonpartisan scholarship. We count among our ranks over 100 affiliated scholars located throughout the nation and the world who appear regularly in national and international media, testify on Capitol Hill, and are consulted by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • BP's Fracking Secrets: Pan American Energy And
    BP’s fracking secrets Pan-American Energy and Argentina’s shale mega-project November 2017 This report was researched and written by Anna Markova (Platform) with input from Hernán Scandizzo BP does not carry out and Diego Di Risio (OPSur). Thanks also to Ariana Ortega and Martín Alvarez (OPSur), Mika Minio- Paluello and Sarah Shoraka (Platform) and Paul fracking in its home Horsman (Greenpeace). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons country, the UK, Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) licence. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes, on the condition because “it would that you attribute the source. License terms: https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ attract the wrong kind of attention” Platform is a London-based organisation that conducts research, education, and campaigns towards a just future beyond fossil fuels. UK company limited by guarantee no. 2658515, registered charity no. 1044485. [email protected] +44 (0)20 7749 1109 Contents Summary 3 Observatorio Petrolero Sur conducts research, 1 BP and Pan-American Energy 4 communications, and intervenes in public policy for a just transition towards a sustainable society 2 What is Vaca Muerta? 8 and energy system. [email protected] +54 (011) 4373-6304 – Buenos Aires 3 Who is BP? 10 +54 (0299) 15 586-4313 – Neuquén 4 Pan-American Energy’s dossier 12 5 The bet on extreme gas 14 Addendum Pan-American Energy in other countries 18 This publication has been produced with the financial Endnotes 19 assistance of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-9/11 American Invasion of Afghanistan: Reasons and Motivations
    Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research idi University-Oum El Bouaghi Faculty of Letters and Languages Department of English Post-9/11 American Invasion of Afghanistan: Reasons and Motivations A Mémoire Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Anglo-American Studies By: BECHEKAOUI Youcef Board of Examiners: Dr. MAAMERI Fatima, Supervisor BOUDJLIT Amina, member 2016-2017 Abstract The reasons and motivations that led Unites States of America to invade Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks made a hot debate among many historians and politicians. Thus, this study is significant because it sheds light on the main embedded aims that the United States of America never stated behind its invasion in the aftermath of the 9/11 events. Although the United States of America claimed that the fundamental reason behind the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 is the 9/11 attacks, there are many other reasons that were overlooked. Afghanistan has a very important geo-strategic location in the world; thereby, this feature allows the United States government to accomplish its economic and political interests within Afghanistan and Central Asia. This study has come to the conclusion that the United States of America used 9/11 attacks as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and serve its imperialistic interests in the area. Keywords: Unites States, Afghanistan, 9/11 attacks, invasion of Afghanistan, economic and political interests, pretext Résumé Les raisons et motivations qui mènent les É tats-Unis D Amérique à envahir juste après les attentats du 11 septembre, a éveillé un débat chaleureux au sein des historiens et politiciens.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Krym Nash': an Analysis of Modern Russian Deception Warfare
    ‘Krym Nash’: An Analysis of Modern Russian Deception Warfare ‘De Krim is van ons’ Een analyse van hedendaagse Russische wijze van oorlogvoeren – inmenging door misleiding (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. H.R.B.M. Kummeling, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 16 december 2020 des middags te 12.45 uur door Albert Johan Hendrik Bouwmeester geboren op 25 mei 1962 te Enschede Promotoren: Prof. dr. B.G.J. de Graaff Prof. dr. P.A.L. Ducheine Dit proefschrift werd mede mogelijk gemaakt met financiële steun van het ministerie van Defensie. ii Table of contents Table of contents .................................................................................................. iii List of abbreviations ............................................................................................ vii Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... vii Country codes .................................................................................................................................................... ix American State Codes ....................................................................................................................................... ix List of figures ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mikhail Fridman: Profile and Perception
    Jan. 29, 2007 MIKHAIL FRIDMAN: PROFILE AND PERCEPTION Summary Wal-Mart has asked Stratfor to provide a report detailing public information available on Russian business-owner Mikhail Fridman, the chairman and controlling stakeholder of the Alfa Group. This group includes the TNK-BP oil company, Alfa Bank and the X5 chain of retail food stores. His estimated net worth of approximately $6.5 billion makes him one of Russia's richest people. He also is considered one of the most influential businessmen in Russia, part of an exclusive group known as oligarchs that rose after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. The purpose of the report is to identify any criminal or unethical behavior connected to Fridman that could harm any potential business relationship. All searches were conducted in a noninvasive manner that would not leave a trail leading back to those seeking the information. Stratfor’s searches indicate Fridman, who currently lives in Moscow, is one of the richest men in Russia with connections to a number of influential business ventures around the world. He himself admits his enormous wealth and business influence was gained through a number of unethical practices. While Fridman’s actions and unethical behavior are well known, such problems are typical of all influential individuals and businesses in the former Soviet Union. Relatively speaking, Fridman is thought to have one of the best reputations among similarly placed Russian businessmen. Traces conducted with U.S. intelligence agencies note that currently there is no adverse intelligence regarding Fridman. Historically, Fridman was tied to organized criminal groups at the time he was establishing his business; these groups are thought to have contributed partially to the success of the ventures.
    [Show full text]
  • Telenor Targers ALFA in US Insider Trading Claim
    Telenor Targers ALFA in US Insider Trading Claim Telenor Wednesday filed a lawsuit in the US District Court in New York against Alfa Group companies for their multiple violations of US securities laws in connection with their purchase of 9.5 per cent of Russian mobile operator VimpelCom between August 2006 and May 2007, including at least two instances of insider trading. The lawsuit is filed against Altimo, Eco Telecom, CTF Holdings, Crown Finance and Rightmarch in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint describes how on two occasions Alexey Reznikovich, Oleg Malis and Mikhail Fridman, the Alfa Group members of VimpelCom's Board, received advance notice of VimpelCom's financial results and a proposed dividend, and caused Eco Telecom and the other Alfa Group defendants to purchase VimpelCom ADSs and shares in the open market prior to VimpelCom's public disclosure of such information. "Telenor has taken this action to protect the rights and interests of VimpelCom and its shareholders," said Jan Edvard Thygesen, Executive Vice President and Head of Telenor in Central/Eastern Europe. Telenor's complaint alleges that in its purchases of VimpelCom shares and ADSs during the period since August 2006, Alfa committed numerous violations of US securities laws, including making false, misleading and incomplete filings with the SEC, failing to comply with US tender offer rules, and engaging in insider trading. "Those who sold VimpelCom shares during this period were not informed of Alfa's intentions and, as a consequence, traded on the basis of incomplete information," Thygesen said.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiira No Me Mar.Pdf (2.061Mb)
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA E CIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS SOCIAIS NAYARA DE OLIVEIRA WIIRA UMA ANÁLISE DA ESTRUTURAÇÃO DO CAPITALISMO RUSSO ATRAVÉS DA PRIVATIZAÇÃO NO GOVERNO YELTSIN (1991-1999). MARÍLIA 2020 NAYARA DE OLIVEIRA WIIRA UMA ANÁLISE DA ESTRUTURAÇÃO DO CAPITALISMO RUSSO ATRAVÉS DA PRIVATIZAÇÃO NO GOVERNO YELTSIN (1991-1999). Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais da Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, da Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP – Campus de Marília, para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências Sociais. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Francisco Luiz Corsi MARÍLIA 2020 Wiira, Nayara de Oliveira W662a Uma análise da estruturação do capitalismo russo através da privatização no governo Yeltsin (1991-1999) / Nayara de Oliveira Wiira. -- Marília, 2020 280 f. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Marília Orientador: Francisco Luiz Corsi 1. História econômica. 2. História econômica russa. 3. Privatização. 4. Capitalismo. I. Título. Sistema de geração automática de fichas catalográficas da Unesp. Biblioteca da Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Marília. Dados fornecidos pelo autor(a). Essa ficha não pode ser modificada. NAYARA DE OLIVEIRA WIIRA UMA ANÁLISE DA ESTRUTURAÇÃO DO CAPITALISMO RUSSO ATRAVÉS DA PRIVATIZAÇÃO NO GOVERNO YELTSIN (1991-1999). Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais da Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, da Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP – Campus de Marília, para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências Sociais. Linha de pesquisa 4: Relações Internacionais e Desenvolvimento BANCA EXAMINADORA ________________________________________ Orientador: Prof. Dr. Francisco Luiz Corsi Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências ________________________________________ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:17-Cv-02041 Document 1 Filed 10/03/17 Page 1 of 14
    Case 1:17-cv-02041 Document 1 Filed 10/03/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ----------------------------------------------------------------X : MIKHAIL FRIDMAN, PETR AVEN, AND : GERMAN KHAN, : Case No. _____/2017 c/o CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN LLP : 2 Wall Street : New York, NY 10005, : COMPLAINT : Plaintiffs, : : -v- : : BEAN LLC (A/K/A FUSION GPS) AND : GLENN SIMPSON, : 1700 Connecticut Avenue, Suite 400 : Washington, D.C. 20009, : : Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------X COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Mikhail Fridman, Petr Aven, and German Khan, by their attorneys Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, allege as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a defamation case brought by three international businessmen who were defamed in widely disseminated political opposition research reports commissioned by political opponents of candidate Donald Trump. The reports (which came to be known as the “Trump Dossier” and the “Dossier”) were published in advance of the 2016 presidential election by the Defendants: the Washington, D.C. based firm Fusion GPS (“Fusion”) and its principal Glenn Simpson, a former journalist specializing in political opposition research. In that role, the Defendants traffic in procuring damaging 8109453.2 Case 1:17-cv-02041 Document 1 Filed 10/03/17 Page 2 of 14 information about political candidates. The reports are gravely damaging in that they falsely accuse the Plaintiffs—and Alfa (“Alfa”), a consortium in which the Plaintiffs are investors—of criminal conduct and alleged cooperation with the “Kremlin” to influence the 2016 presidential election. But neither the Plaintiffs nor Alfa committed any of the acts irresponsibly attributed to them by the Defendants. To the contrary, the Plaintiffs and Alfa are collateral damage in a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual REPORT “In 2009, Alfa-Bank Not Only Succeeded in Retaining Market Share in Its Main Business Segments, but Also Increased It in Certain Areas.”
    staying ahe d 2009 AnnuAL REPORT “In 2009, Alfa-Bank not only succeeded in retaining market share in its main business segments, but also increased it in certain areas.” Mikhail Fridman Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Alfa Group Consortium Alfa-Bank 2009* countries 5 branches and offices 326 employees 14 117 corporate clients 53 000 retail clients 3 900 000 profit, usd million 77 equity, usd million 2 698 loan portfolio, usd million 14 953 total assets, usd million 21 646 * For the purposes of this report, the term “Alfa-Bank” is used to describe ABH Financial Limited and its subsidiaries. Alfa-Bank • Annual Report 2009 • Alfa-Bank 2009 1 Alfa-Bank Awards and Recognition in 2009 JP MORGAN and Сommerzbank AG “The Best Correspondent Bank in Dollar Settlements” “Excellence in Commercial Payments and Money Transfers Co-operation” EUROMONEY Magazine Alfa-Bank was recognised as “The Best Bank in Russia” Price Waterhouse Coopers and SENTEO AWARD «Customer Experience Index — 2009: Who is Winning the Retail Banking Race in Russia» NEXTEP Group Alfa-Bank was rated the Best Customer Service Bank in Moscow Mediologia Mass Media Analysis and Monitoring System Alfa-Bank was the Most Frequently Cited Bank SPEAR’S UK Magazine Alfa-Bank was awarded Russia’s first SPEAR’S Russia Wealth Management Awards for achievements in private banking & wealth management 2 Alfa-Bank • Annual Report 2009 • Alfa-Bank Awards And Recognition In 2009 Contents The Board of Directors report on Alfa-Bank’s results in its priority business areas 4-5 Board of Directors and
    [Show full text]