DOCSLIB.ORG

ROMA INCLUSION in the CROATIAN SOCIETY Identity, Social Distance and the Experience of Discrimination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ROMA INCLUSION in the CROATIAN SOCIETY Identity, Social Distance and the Experience of Discrimination Europska unija Zajedno do fondova EU ROMA INCLUSION IN THE CROATIAN SOCIETY identity, social distance and the experience of discrimination Nikola Rašić - Danijela Lucić - Branka Galić - Nenad Karajić Publisher: Office for Human Rights and the Rights of National Minorities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia For the publisher: Alen Tahiri, M.A.Pol Sci Year of publication: 2020 Original title: Uključivanje Roma u hrvatsko društvo: identitet, socijalna distanca i iskustvo diskriminacije Authors: Nikola Rašić, Danijela Lucić, Branka Galić, Nenad Karajić Reviewers: Helena Popović and Krunoslav Nikodem Translation: Sinonim d.o.o. Graphic design, editing and printing: Kerschoffset d.o.o. Circulation: 50 copies Cataloguing-in-Publication data available in the Online Catalogue of the National and University Library in Zagreb under CIP record 001083072. ISBN: 978-953-7870-26-3 Projekt je sufinancirala Europska unija iz Europskog socijalnog fonda. Sadržaj publikacije isključiva je odgovornost Ureda za ljudska prava i prava nacionalnih manjina Vlade Republike Hrvatske. Za više informacija: Ured za ljudska prava i prava nacionalnih manjina Vlade Republike Hrvatske Mesnička 23, 10 000 Zagreb, + 385 (1) 4569 358, [email protected] Više informacija o EU fondovima dostupno je na www.strukturnifondovi.hr ROMA INCLUSION IN THE CROATIAN SOCIETY identity, social distance and the experience of discrimination Nikola Rašić - Danijela Lucić - Branka Galić - Nenad Karajić Zagreb, 2020 DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the institutions in which the authors are employed nor the views of the Office for Human Rights and the Rights of National Minorities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia. NOTE: All linguistic forms having a gender form in this study shall apply equally to both males and females, regardless of the form used. Content List of tables ................................................................................................................... 5 List of graphs .................................................................................................................. 7 List of abbreviations ..................................................................................................... 10 1. INTRODUCTION: THE DISADVANTAGED POSITION OF THE ROMA ...........12 2. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY ........................................18 2.1. Objectives of the study on identity, social distance and experience of discrimination .............................................................................................. 18 2.2. Data sources ......................................................................................................19 2.3. Methodology of the study on identity, social distance and experience of discrimination ..............................................................................................22 2.3.1. Regional division and population size estimation .............................22 2.3.2. Processing and analysis of quantitative data ....................................23 2.3.3. Processing and analysis of qualitative data .......................................24 3. ROMA IDENTITY IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA .................................... 26 3.1. Roma origins: linguistic, genetic, anthropological and sociocultural arguments ........................................................................................................26 3.1.1. Language as a clue ...............................................................................28 3.1.2. Roma in Croatia – data and groups ....................................................35 3.1.3. Language and dialects of Roma in the Republic of Croatia .............40 3.1.4. Religion ..................................................................................................45 3.1.5. Norms and values of the Roma population and the recognizability of Roma culture .....................................................................................51 3.2. Chapter summary ............................................................................................68 4. SOCIAL DISTANCE AND INCLUSION IN SOCIAL LIFE .............................. 74 4.1. The position of members of the Roma national minority ..........................74 4.1.1. Relationship between the Roma and non-Roma population ...........76 4.1.2. Perception of one’s own community ..................................................77 4.1.3. Perception of media coverage .............................................................80 4.2. Political participation ......................................................................................85 4.3. Participation in cultural, artistic and sports life ..........................................96 4.3.1. A gathering place for community members ......................................97 4.3.2. Organized sports and/or recreation .................................................100 4.3.3. Culture and arts societies (CAS) ....................................................... 106 4.3.4. Cultural and entertainment facilities and events ............................ 109 4.4. Chapter summary ........................................................................................... 117 5. EXPERIENCE OF DISCRIMINATION OF RNM MEMBERS ..........................122 5.1. Theoretical framework for the study of discrimination ............................ 122 5.1.1. Prejudices, stereotypes and discrimination – sociological interpretations .................................................................................... 122 5.1.2. Legal framework for combating discrimination .............................. 125 5.2. Discrimination and anti-Gypsyism in EU countries .................................... 127 5.3. Discrimination against the Roma in Croatia ............................................... 129 5.3.1. Experience of discrimination – research results .............................. 131 5.3.2. Perception of discrimination .............................................................. 143 5.3.3. Who to contact in case of discrimination ........................................ 148 5.3.4. Experience of hate crimes and police conduct ............................... 150 5.4. Chapter summary .......................................................................................... 154 6. THE POSITION OF RNM MEMBERS IN THE JUDICIARY ...........................158 6.1. Status issues .................................................................................................. 158 6.2. Free legal aid ..................................................................................................163 6.3. Convictions for criminal and misdemeanor offences, including minors ...166 6.4. Chapter summary .......................................................................................... 168 7. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: INCLUSION AND EQUALITY OF THE ROMA AS THE OUTCOME ......................................................... 170 List of tables Table 1. Regional division and population size estimation ...................................22 Table 2. Regional presentation of the share of the population according to the type of settlement ...................................................................................... 23 Table 3. Regional representation of Roma groups ................................................. 38 Table 4. The language of the Roma in localities and according to region – Romani ...........................................................................................41 Table 5. The language of the Roma in localities and according to region – the Bayash dialects of the Romanian language .......................42 Table 6. Share of the population living in localities where there is (no) religious facility according to the type of settlement ....................50 Table 7. By which element of Roma culture and customs would you like the Roma to be most recognized in Croatia? (idealistic perception) ... 52 Table 8. What are the elements by which the culture and tradition of the Roma is most recognized today among the majority population in Croatia (realistic perception) ................................................................. 53 Table 9. The importance of preserving the characteristics of Roma life ............ 55 Table 10. The importance of preserving the Romani language according to region ........................................................................................................... 56 Table 11. Norms of the Roma population .................................................................60 Table 12. Perception of one’s own community by the majority population according to the type of settlement (positive perception) .................... 79 Table 13. Gender differences in the frequency of voting in elections according to age group ................................................................................................87 Table 14. Premises for the gathering of community members in the localities according to region ..................................................................................... 97 Table 15. Organized sports and/or recreation in localities according to region.....101 Table 16. Sports and/or recreational facilities in localities according to the type of settlement and region ......................................................... 104 Table 17. Distance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Acrobat Pdf Format)!
    EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE 1386 Budapest 62, P.O. Box 906/93, Hungary Phone: (36-1) 413-2200; Fax: (36-1) 413-2201 E-mail: [email protected] http://errc.org Written Comments of the European Roma Rights Centre Concerning the Russian Federation for Consideration by the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination at its 73rd Session, 28 July -15 August 2008 1. Introduction 1.1. The European Roma Rights Centre (“the ERRC”) respectfully submits written comments concerning the Russian Federation for consideration by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (“the Committee”) at its 73rd session, 28 July – 15 August 2008. The ERRC is an international public interest law organisation engaging in activities aimed at combating anti-Romani racism and human rights abuse of Roma, in particular strategic litigation, international advocacy, research and policy development, and training of Romani activists. 1.2. The ERRC has been monitoring Roma rights in Russia since 2000, revealing an alarming pattern of human rights abuse of Roma and other people perceived as "Gypsies".1 Despite the rich ethnic diversity of a country that is home to approximately 160 ethnic groups or nationalities, it is important to single out Roma and assess their human rights situation, because not all minority groups in Russia are the object of egregious racist treatment and hate crime. Several ethnic/national communities are particularly vulnerable on the whole territory of the state, wherever they happen to be. The infamous label “person of Caucasian nationality “ applied by the Russian authorities to refer to a range of people such as Chechens, Ingushetians, Ossetians, Dagestanis, Georgians, Azeris, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin
    www.ssoar.info Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2017). Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2017, Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 48–59 DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Article Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Elena Marushiakova * and Vesselin Popov School of History, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9BA, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.M.), [email protected] (V.P.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 14 August 2017 | Accepted: 16 October 2017 | Published: 22 December 2017 Abstract This article presents the history of the politics of multilingualism (or lack thereof) in regard to Roma (formerly known as ‘Gypsies’). In the 1920s and 1930s in the newly established Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, against a backdrop of pro- claimed principles of full equality of all peoples1 living in the new state, commenced a rapid creation of schools for Roma children with instruction in Romani mother-tongue along with special training of Roma teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting the Social Inclusion of Roma
    EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors European Commission and these are not necessarily those of either the DG Employment, Social Affairs European Commission or the Member States. and Inclusion The original language of the report is English. EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT Overview based on the national reports prepared by the EU Network of Independent Experts on Social Inclusion Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors and these are not necessarily those of either the European Commission or the Member States. The original language of the report is English. On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion SYNTHESIS REPORT Contents Preface 3 Summary, conclusions and suggestions 4 A. Summary 4 A.1 Overview of the situation of the Roma in the European Union (EU) 4 A.2 Assessment of existing policy and governance frameworks and identification of key policy priorities to be addressed in national Roma integration strategies 6 B. Conclusions and suggestions 12 1. Overview of the Situation of the Roma in the EU 16 1.1 Roma population across the EU 16 1.2 Geographical variations within countries 20 1.3 Poverty and social exclusion of Roma 22 1.3.1 Income poverty and deprivation 23 1.3.2 Educational disadvantage 24 1.3.3 Employment disadvantage 27 1.3.4 Poor health 30 1.3.5 Inadequate housing and environment 32 1.3.6 Limited access to sport, recreation and culture 34 1.4 Widespread discrimination and racism 35 1.5 Gender discrimination 38 1.6 Extensive data gaps 39 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Films
    CALL FOR FILMS To all Roma, Sinti, Kale, Kalderash, Lovara, Lalleri, Ursari, Beasch, Manouches, Ashkali, Aurari, Romanichals, Droma, Doma, Gypsies, Travellers and all the other Romani groups of the world… The fourth Festival of Romani Film will take place in Berlin in 2020: AKE DIKHEA? Festival of Romani Film 19 – 23 November 2020 We are looking for films with which members of different Romani groups can identify to. People with a Romani background or self-organizations can propose films by Roma and non-Roma filmmakers whose themes concern the lives of Romani people in the world and critically reflect upon the reality of discrimination. Possibilities of film registration: FilmFreeWay: https://filmfreeway.com/AkeDikhea Form: https://bit.ly/2NiDumj E-mail: [email protected] Deadline for submission of proposals: Sunday, 9 August 2020 Background information: AKE DIKHEA? translated means “YOU SEE?". It is a self-organized, international festival of Romani film that will take place in Berlin in November 2020. The festival presents Berlin, Germany and the whole world from the perspective of Romani people: Which films represent us, which themes are important to us, how do we see ourselves and how do we want to be seen? We don't want to wait until someone gives us a voice. We want to shape the social space ourselves and decide on the themes and structure of the festival events. The festival is organized by the Berlin Roma self-organization RomaTrial in cooperation with Germany's oldest cinema, Moviemento. Further information can be found on the roma-filmfestival.com website. Selection process The AKE DIKHEA? Festival of Romani Film stands for a unique, participatory selection process: Thanks to our worldwide network of (Romani) filmmakers, we are able to discover topics, people and perspectives that would otherwise remain hidden or only have a local or national impact.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Status of the Romani Language in Europe. Mercator Working Papers
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 479 303 FL 027 781 AUTHOR Bakker, Peter; Rooker, Marcia TITLE The Political Status of the Romani Language in Europe. Mercator Working Papers. SPONS AGENCY European Union, Brussels (Belgium). REPORT NO WP-3 ISSN ISSN-1133-3928 PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 37p.; Produced by CIEMEN (Escarre International Centre for Ethnic Minorities and Nations), Barcelona, Spain. Contains small print. AVAILABLE FROM CIEMEN, Rocafort 242, bis, 08020 Barcelona,(Catalunya), Spain. Tel: 34-93-444-38-00; Fax: 34-93-444-38-09; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://www.ciemen.org/mercator. For full text: http://www.ciemen.org/mercator/ pdf/wp3-def-ang.PDF. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Civil Rights; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; Language Usage; Language of Instruction; *Minority Groups;,Public Policy; *Regional Dialects; Sociolinguistics IDENTIFIERS European Union; *Gypsies; Roma ABSTRACT This paper examines the political status of Romani. the language of the Gypsies/Roma, in the European Union (EU). Even though some groups do not call themselves "Roma," all Romani speaking groups use the name "Romanes" for their language and "Romani/Romano/Romane" for everything related to their group. All groups use the same language, and all languages can be subdivided into dialects. Three aspects make Romani dialects more diverse than other EU dialects: absence of centuries long influence from a standard language or prestige dialect; influence from a variety of local languages; and a great number of communities of Romani speakers (with speakers not all in contact with each other).
    [Show full text]
  • Analogy in Lovari Morphology
    Analogy in Lovari Morphology Márton András Baló Ph.D. dissertation Supervisor: László Kálmán C.Sc. Doctoral School of Linguistics Gábor Tolcsvai Nagy MHAS Theoretical Linguistics Doctoral Programme Zoltán Bánréti C.Sc. Department of Theoretical Linguistics Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest Budapest, 2016 Contents 1. General introduction 4 1.1. The aim of the study of language . 4 2. Analogy in grammar 4 2.1. Patterns and exemplars versus rules and categories . 4 2.2. Analogy and similarity . 6 2.3. Neither synchronic, nor diachronic . 9 2.4. Variation and frequency . 10 2.5. Rich memory and exemplars . 12 2.6. Paradigms . 14 2.7. Patterns, prototypes and modelling . 15 3. Introduction to the Romani language 18 3.1. Discovery, early history and research . 18 3.2. Later history . 21 3.3. Para-Romani . 22 3.4. Recent research . 23 3.5. Dialects . 23 3.6. The Romani people in Hungary . 28 3.7. Dialects in Hungary . 29 3.8. Dialect diversity and dialectal pluralism . 31 3.9. Current research activities . 33 3.10. Research of Romani in Hungary . 34 3.11. The current research . 35 4. The Lovari sound system 37 4.1. Consonants . 37 4.2. Vowels . 37 4.3. Stress . 38 5. A critical description of Lovari morphology 38 5.1. Nominal inflection . 38 5.1.1. Gender . 39 5.1.2. Animacy . 40 5.1.3. Case . 42 5.1.4. Additional features. 47 5.2. Verbal inflection . 50 5.2.1. The present tense . 50 5.2.2. Verb derivation. 54 5.2.2.1. Transitive derivational markers .
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary: Traditional Roma Names
    Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Page 1 of 9 Home Country of Origin Information Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests (RIR) are research reports on country conditions. They are requested by IRB decision makers. The database contains a seven-year archive of English and French RIR. Earlier RIR may be found on the UNHCR's Refworld website. Please note that some RIR have attachments which are not electronically accessible here. To obtain a copy of an attachment, please e-mail us. Related Links • Advanced search help 8 January 2018 HUN106036.E Hungary: Traditional Roma names; name-changing practices after marriage; languages spoken by Roma, including variations in spoken Hungarian (2015- December 2017) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa 1. Traditional Roma Names In correspondence with the Research Directorate, Tamás Farkas, a linguist at Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest (Országos Doktori Tanács 2017), indicated that the most common and typical surnames of Roma in Hungary are linguistically of Hungarian origin (Farkas 21 Dec. 2017). The same source added that "it is not so easy" to distinguish between Roma names and the rest of the Hungarian population "as in the case of other national or ethnic minorities" (Farkas 21 Dec. 2017). However, the same source indicated that, when looking at someone's full name, https://irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/country-information/rir/Pages/index.aspx?doc=457338&pls=1 9/7/2018 Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Page 2 of 9 there are some personal names for which "it is quite obvious that the person belongs to the Roma population" (Farkas 20 Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Resource
    CAN YOU HEAR ME? FOR MOST OF ROMANI CHILDREN CROATIAN IS NOT THEIR FIRST LANGUAGE, I.E., THEIR MOTHER TONGUE. THAT MEANS THAT SINCE CHILDHOOD THEY LEARN AND COMMUNICATE IN SOME OTHER LANGUAGE WITHIN THEIR FAMILIES. SOME ROMANI CHILDREN STARTING SCHOOL ARE NOT FAMILIAR ENOUGH WITH CROATIAN, OR DO NOT SPEAK IT ALL. UNLIKE OTHER CHILDREN, FOR WHOM CROATIAN IS THEIR FIRST LANGUAGE, ROMANI CHILDREN LEARN EVERY DAY IN A LANGUAGE THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WELL. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO MASTER A LANGUAGE? Proficiency in a language includes the ability BASIC FACTS ABOUT THE to speak, as well as all the activities that in- LANGUAGES SPOKEN BY THE The word ‘Roma’ or ‘Romani’ refers to Romani, Travellers, Sinti and other groups (Manouche, Gitano, volve the everyday use of listening, reading ROMANI IN CROATIA Resande, Romer, Romanlar, Domlar, Lomlar, Kaale, Egyptians, Ashkali, Tattare, Gypsies, Scottish Travellers, and writing skills. Too often teachers believe Mandopolini, Ghurbeti, Beyash (Rudari/Ludari), Jevgjit and many others), most of whom adhere to notions that a child who mastered speaking in Croa- Romani language/romani ćhib [t∫ib] of common origins, shared cultural practices and similar traditions. tian can perform deeper cognitive processes and Bayash Romanian/ljimba d’bjash and produce new knowledge in that language [lyimba dbya∫] are the two languages Translation of these documents into English was supported by the International Step by Step Association and that it is not true. spoken by most of the Romani and the Romani Early Years Network. A child first develops the basic skills needed people in Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Race' and Diaspora: Romani Music Making in Ostrava, Czech Republic
    Music, ‘Race’ and Diaspora: Romani Music Making in Ostrava, Czech Republic Melissa Wynne Elliott 2005 School of Oriental and African Studies University of London PhD ProQuest Number: 10731268 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731268 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract This thesis is a contribution towards an historically informed understanding of contemporary music making amongst Roma in Ostrava, Czech Republic. It also challenges, from a theoretical perspective, conceptions of relationships between music and discourses of ‘race’. My research is based on fieldwork conducted in Ostrava, between August 2003 and July 2004 and East Slovakia in July 2004, as well as archival research in Ostrava and Vienna. These fieldwork experiences compelled me to explore music and ideas of ‘race’ through discourses of diaspora in order to assist in conceptualising and interpreting Romani music making in Ostrava. The vast majority of Roma in Ostrava are post-World War II emigres or descendants of emigres from East Slovakia. In contemporary Ostrava, most Roma live on the socio­ economic margins and are most often regarded as a separate ‘race’ with a separate culture from the dominant population.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    RICE UNIVERSITY The Struggle for Modern Athens: Unconventional Citizens and the Shaping of a New Political Reality by Othon Alexandrakis A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE Doctor of Philosophy APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE: ttill g^ jLS^x£ft //t/T- Jafmelames Faubi((nFaubioV, Professor, Anthropology Amy Ninetto, Assistant Professor^Anthropology Lora Wildenthal, Associate Professor, History Eugenia Georges, Professor, Anthropology HOUSTON, TEXAS FEBRUARY 2010 UMI Number: 3421434 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3421434 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Copyright Othon Alexandrakis 2010 ABSTRACT The Struggle for Modern Athens: Unconventional Citizens and the Shaping of a New Political Reality by Othon Alexandrakis The dissertation is based on over one-and-a-half years of ethnographic field research conducted in Athens, Greece, among various diverse populations practicing unconventional modes of citizenship, that is, citizenship imagined and practiced in contradiction to traditional, prescribed, or sanctioned civil identities. I focus specifically on newcomer undocumented migrant populations from Africa, the broadly segregated and disenfranchised Roma (Gypsy) community, and the rapidly growing anti- establishment youth population.
    [Show full text]
  • The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration
    guo namuuiy B/121188 The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration General Editor Immanuel Ness Volume V Rem-Z )WILEY~BLACKWELL A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication Contents Volume I Contents to Volume I: Prehistory IX Lexicon xiii Notes on Contributors xlvii Introduction cxxvi Acknowledgments cxxxii Abbreviations cxxxv Maps cxxxvii Prehistory Part I: The Peopling of the World during the Pleistocene 7 Part II: Holocene migrations 11 Volume II Global Human Migration A—Cro 417-1122 Volume III Global Human Migration Cru-Ind 1123-1810 Volume IV Global Human Migration Ind-Rem 1811-2550 Volume V Global Human Migration Rem-Z 2551-3180 Index to Volume I: Prehistory 3181 Index to Volumes II-V 3197 3182 INDEX TO VOLUME I: PREHISTORY Anatolia (confd) Arawak culture, 379-80, 394, 397 Ice Age land bridge, 327 Mesolithic, 143^4 language, 87, 89, 93, 384, 385, language families, 87, 328 migrations into Europe, 141—4 386-7, 392, 396-7 linguistic history, 327-32 see also Anatolia Hypothesis origin, 379 lithic technologies, 44-5, 58 Neolithic culture, 139-40, 141, society, 397 megafauna, 56—7 142, 143-4 speakers, 376, 378, 379-80 migrations within, 57 pottery, 143 spread, 380, 386-7, 398 modern populations, 254 see also Turkey archaeological evidence, 32, 293 Northern Territories, 330 Anatolia Hypothesis, 92, 161, 163, cultural changes, 40-6, 108-9 Pleistocene, 327 169,170-1 paucity, 14, 104, 112 Western Desert, 330 Ancient Egypt and radiocarbon dating see see also Tasmania archaeological sites, 135—6, under radiocarbon dating Australo-Melanesians, 220
    [Show full text]
  • Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2002 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Third printing, July 2004 Copyright © 2002 by Ian Hancock, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Michael Zimmermann, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Guenter Lewy, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Mark Biondich, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Denis Peschanski, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Viorel Achim, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by David M. Crowe, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................i Paul A. Shapiro and Robert M. Ehrenreich Romani Americans (“Gypsies”).......................................................................................................1 Ian
    [Show full text]