DOCSLIB.ORG

Promoting the Social Inclusion of Roma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Promoting the Social Inclusion of Roma EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors European Commission and these are not necessarily those of either the DG Employment, Social Affairs European Commission or the Member States. and Inclusion The original language of the report is English. EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT Overview based on the national reports prepared by the EU Network of Independent Experts on Social Inclusion Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors and these are not necessarily those of either the European Commission or the Member States. The original language of the report is English. On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion SYNTHESIS REPORT Contents Preface 3 Summary, conclusions and suggestions 4 A. Summary 4 A.1 Overview of the situation of the Roma in the European Union (EU) 4 A.2 Assessment of existing policy and governance frameworks and identification of key policy priorities to be addressed in national Roma integration strategies 6 B. Conclusions and suggestions 12 1. Overview of the Situation of the Roma in the EU 16 1.1 Roma population across the EU 16 1.2 Geographical variations within countries 20 1.3 Poverty and social exclusion of Roma 22 1.3.1 Income poverty and deprivation 23 1.3.2 Educational disadvantage 24 1.3.3 Employment disadvantage 27 1.3.4 Poor health 30 1.3.5 Inadequate housing and environment 32 1.3.6 Limited access to sport, recreation and culture 34 1.4 Widespread discrimination and racism 35 1.5 Gender discrimination 38 1.6 Extensive data gaps 39 2. Assessment of existing policy and governance frameworks 42 2.1 Overall policy frameworks 43 2.2 Targets 47 2.3 National Reform Programmes (NRPs) and the Roma 48 2.4 Main strengths and weaknesses of policies 49 2.4.1 Income (tax and welfare policies) 50 2.4.2 Education 52 2.4.3 Employment 55 2.4.4 Health 57 2.4.5 Housing and environment 59 2.4.6 Personal social services 60 2.4.7 Sport, recreation, culture 61 2.4.8 Anti-discrimination 62 2.4.9 Gender equality 64 2.5 Use of EU Structural Funds 64 2.6 Role of civil society organisations and international organisations 67 1 SYNTHESIS REPORT 3. Key policy priorities for Member States 71 3.1 Key elements to include in Roma integration strategies 71 3.1.1 Overall elements 72 3.1.2 Access to education 74 3.1.3 Employment 78 3.1.4 Healthcare 82 3.1.5 Social and day-care services 84 3.1.6 Housing and environment 85 3.1.7 Income support 88 3.1.8 Transport 89 3.1.9 Sport/recreation/cultural activities 89 3.1.10 Anti-discrimination 89 3.1.11 Gender equality 92 3.2 Strengthening data collection, monitoring and evaluation 92 3.3 Strengthening cooperation and dialogue 94 3.4 Enhancing use of EU Structural Funds 97 3.5 Integrating Roma into Europe 2020 98 3.5.1 Integrating Roma into Europe 2020 targets 98 3.5.2 Integrating Roma into NRPs 99 2 SYNTHESIS REPORT Preface In a Communication issued in April 2011, the European Commission presented a European Union (EU) Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies up to 20201. This Framework seeks to ensure a more efficient monitoring of, and support to national and EU efforts with regard to Roma integration. This EU Framework should help guide national Roma policies and mobilise funds available at EU level to support Roma inclusion efforts. The Framework focuses on four pillars: access to education, jobs, healthcare and housing. Member States are expected to set individual national Roma integration goals in proportion to the Roma population on their territory and depending on their starting point. They have to submit national Roma strategies by the end of 2011 specifying how they will contribute to the achievement of these goals. These national strategies should pursue a targeted approach in line with the Common Basic Principles on Roma Inclusion2. In this context, the members of the EU Network of Independent Experts on Social Inclusion were asked, in their second 2011 country reports, to prepare country reports on the social inclusion of Roma. These reports are intended to contribute to the EU’s work on economic and social inclusion of Roma, following up the 2011 Commission’s Communication. Network experts from non-EU countries have also provided thematic reports on Roma (except Iceland). Experts for those Member States with very few Roma (i.e. LU, MT) did not prepare reports on Roma. Also the experts for Cyprus and Denmark, given the small numbers concerned, only produced short reports on Roma as part of wider reports on migrants and/or other ethnic minorities. This Synthesis Report draws on the experts’ reports covering 25 of the 27 EU Member States. It gives an overview of the situation of Roma in the EU, assesses existing policy and governance frameworks in Member States and identifies common themes among the key challenges that experts address to Member States in relation to their preparation of National Roma Integration Strategies. It also contains a series of suggestions for advancing future work at national and EU level on promoting the social inclusion of Roma. We want to emphasise that in this Synthesis Report, where the experience in one or more individual Member States is highlighted, this is either because the independent experts from these countries have emphasised the particular point or because we think they represent a good illustration of the issue under discussion. Consequently, the fact that a particular country is mentioned does not necessarily mean that the point being made does not apply to other countries. In producing their reports, experts cite many different sources and reports in support of their analysis. References to these have not been included in this report. Readers wishing to follow up the original sources are invited to go to the individual experts’ reports. 1 European Commission, An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies up to 2020, COM (2011) 173 final, Brussels. It is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/discrimination/docs/com_2011_173_en.pdf. See also the press release launching the Framework which contains more links to the EU’s work on Roma: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/11/400&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN& guiLanguage=en. 2 The 10 Common Basic Principles on Roma Inclusion were presented at the first Roma Platform meeting on 24 April 2009. They comprise: 1) constructive, pragmatic and non-discriminatory policies; 2) explicit but not exclusive targeting; 3) intercultural approach; 4) aiming for the mainstream; 5) awareness of the gender dimension; 6) transfer of evidence-based policies; 7) use of EU instruments; 8) involvement of regional and local authorities; 9) involvement of civil society; and 10) active participation of Roma. 3 SYNTHESIS REPORT Summary, conclusions and suggestions A. Summary A.1 Overview of the situation of the Roma in the European Union (EU)3 At the outset, it should be stressed that giving a good picture of the situation of Roma in the EU is seriously compromised by the lack of data. Data either do not exist or are out of date or are partial and incomplete. Qualitative studies or local studies on particular issues are more common than comprehensive quantitative national reports. In some countries, information gaps have been exacerbated with the recent arrival of European Roma from other EU countries and from outside the EU. The lack of data concerns a wide range of issues: lack of demographic data (population numbers, age, gender, geographical distribution, etc.); lack of data about income, wealth, poverty and social exclusion; lack of data about housing, health, education and employment outcomes; lack of administrative data (particularly in relation to access to services); lack of data about the extent to which Roma benefit from particular policies; lack of data about discrimination; etc. This lack of data has two very negative effects. First, it can serve to make the problems faced by Roma “invisible” and thus become an excuse for inaction. Secondly, it can undermine effective policy making and regular monitoring of the effectiveness of policies. Roma population across the EU There are no precise figures on the number of Roma in any Member State and national estimates vary widely. There is a very wide diversity across the EU ranging from those countries where the Roma make up between 5-8% of the total population to those where they are less than 0.5%. However, even in most of the countries where there are (relatively) small numbers of Roma, these numbers represent still a significant minority of people who very often experience high levels of poverty and social exclusion. Only in Cyprus, Luxembourg, Malta and, to some extent, Denmark and Lithuania, are the numbers so low as to be not very significant. The age profile of Roma in all Member States is much younger than the national average, with a much higher proportion of young people and a relatively small older population. The Roma in the EU are very heterogeneous and experts stress the diversity and complexity of Roma populations in their countries. There are “national” Roma who have been resident for many centuries but who may sub-divide into distinct groups.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Great “Gypsy” Round-Up in Spain
    PROJECT EDUCATION OF ROMA | HISTORY ROMA CHILDREN COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L´EUROPE IN EUROPE THE GREAT “GYPSY” 3.3 ROUND-UP IN SPAIN The Great Antonio Gómez Alfaro “Gypsy” Round-up in Spain A Preventive Security Measure l A Favourable Juncture l The Strategy l Funding the Round-up l The Prisoners’ Destination l Review of the Round-up l Problems with Freed “Gypsies” l The Reasons for the Pardon l An Unexpected Delay The Age of Enlightened Absolutism provided the authorities with increasing opportunities to apply their measures on all the citizens in their range of power. In Spain, this resulted in the most painful episode in the history of the country’s “Gypsy” community: the general round-up carried out during the reign of Ferdinand VI, on July 30, 1749. The operation, which was as thorough as it was indiscriminate, led to the internment of ten to twelve thousand people, men and women, young and old, “simply because they were Gypsies.” The co-ordination of the different public authorities involved, the co-operation of the Church, which remained passive in the face of such injustice, the excesses committed by all those who made the operation possible, and the collaboration of the prisoners’ fellow citizens and neighbours made “Black Wednesday”, as the round-up is also called, an unchallenged event in the long history of European anti-“Gypsyism”. Oviedo A S T U R I A S CANTABRIA BASQUE NUMBER OF “GYPSY” FAMILIES DOMICILED COUNTRY Following a list by the Council of Castile, probably of 1749 N A V A R R E Ill.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMA INCLUSION in the CROATIAN SOCIETY Identity, Social Distance and the Experience of Discrimination
    Europska unija Zajedno do fondova EU ROMA INCLUSION IN THE CROATIAN SOCIETY identity, social distance and the experience of discrimination Nikola Rašić - Danijela Lucić - Branka Galić - Nenad Karajić Publisher: Office for Human Rights and the Rights of National Minorities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia For the publisher: Alen Tahiri, M.A.Pol Sci Year of publication: 2020 Original title: Uključivanje Roma u hrvatsko društvo: identitet, socijalna distanca i iskustvo diskriminacije Authors: Nikola Rašić, Danijela Lucić, Branka Galić, Nenad Karajić Reviewers: Helena Popović and Krunoslav Nikodem Translation: Sinonim d.o.o. Graphic design, editing and printing: Kerschoffset d.o.o. Circulation: 50 copies Cataloguing-in-Publication data available in the Online Catalogue of the National and University Library in Zagreb under CIP record 001083072. ISBN: 978-953-7870-26-3 Projekt je sufinancirala Europska unija iz Europskog socijalnog fonda. Sadržaj publikacije isključiva je odgovornost Ureda za ljudska prava i prava nacionalnih manjina Vlade Republike Hrvatske. Za više informacija: Ured za ljudska prava i prava nacionalnih manjina Vlade Republike Hrvatske Mesnička 23, 10 000 Zagreb, + 385 (1) 4569 358, [email protected] Više informacija o EU fondovima dostupno je na www.strukturnifondovi.hr ROMA INCLUSION IN THE CROATIAN SOCIETY identity, social distance and the experience of discrimination Nikola Rašić - Danijela Lucić - Branka Galić - Nenad Karajić Zagreb, 2020 DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the institutions in which the authors are employed nor the views of the Office for Human Rights and the Rights of National Minorities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin
    www.ssoar.info Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2017). Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2017, Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 48–59 DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Article Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Elena Marushiakova * and Vesselin Popov School of History, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9BA, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.M.), [email protected] (V.P.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 14 August 2017 | Accepted: 16 October 2017 | Published: 22 December 2017 Abstract This article presents the history of the politics of multilingualism (or lack thereof) in regard to Roma (formerly known as ‘Gypsies’). In the 1920s and 1930s in the newly established Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, against a backdrop of pro- claimed principles of full equality of all peoples1 living in the new state, commenced a rapid creation of schools for Roma children with instruction in Romani mother-tongue along with special training of Roma teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Outline
    COMMON AND DIFFERING IMPACTS OF THE EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF SWEDEN AND POLAND A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Katarzyna M. Polanska IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Advisers: Professor Ann Hironaka and Professor Joachim J. Savelsberg December 2012 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I want to thank my advisors, Ann Hironaka and Joachim Savelsberg. Ann’s excellent guidance, caring, patience, and encouragement truly kept me going. She was always available to discuss my ideas, and provide feedback and suggestions on how to strengthen my arguments. Joachim’s feedback was invaluable and conversations with him led to many of the ideas put forth; his comments and critiques enriched the work. Countless conversations with these two intelligent mentors helped focus and improve my work. I cannot thank them enough. I also benefitted from my superb dissertation committee. Its members provided important input and critique at various stages of research and writing. Ron Aminzade reminded me of the importance of considering a variety of forces in the study of social phenomena and his comments improved my arguments. Joseph Gerteis provided excellent suggestions on how to clarify of my arguments, suggested methods, and challenged me to strengthen the project in a variety of ways. I also thank Helga Leitner for her thoughtful critique and support over the years. During my time at the University of Minnesota, I took a number of excellent and intellectually stimulating classes and met a number of other faculty who left an impression and inspired me in a variety of ways including Jeffrey Broadbent, Liz Boyle, Robin Stryker, and Evan Schofer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Status of the Romani Language in Europe. Mercator Working Papers
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 479 303 FL 027 781 AUTHOR Bakker, Peter; Rooker, Marcia TITLE The Political Status of the Romani Language in Europe. Mercator Working Papers. SPONS AGENCY European Union, Brussels (Belgium). REPORT NO WP-3 ISSN ISSN-1133-3928 PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 37p.; Produced by CIEMEN (Escarre International Centre for Ethnic Minorities and Nations), Barcelona, Spain. Contains small print. AVAILABLE FROM CIEMEN, Rocafort 242, bis, 08020 Barcelona,(Catalunya), Spain. Tel: 34-93-444-38-00; Fax: 34-93-444-38-09; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://www.ciemen.org/mercator. For full text: http://www.ciemen.org/mercator/ pdf/wp3-def-ang.PDF. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Civil Rights; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; Language Usage; Language of Instruction; *Minority Groups;,Public Policy; *Regional Dialects; Sociolinguistics IDENTIFIERS European Union; *Gypsies; Roma ABSTRACT This paper examines the political status of Romani. the language of the Gypsies/Roma, in the European Union (EU). Even though some groups do not call themselves "Roma," all Romani speaking groups use the name "Romanes" for their language and "Romani/Romano/Romane" for everything related to their group. All groups use the same language, and all languages can be subdivided into dialects. Three aspects make Romani dialects more diverse than other EU dialects: absence of centuries long influence from a standard language or prestige dialect; influence from a variety of local languages; and a great number of communities of Romani speakers (with speakers not all in contact with each other).
    [Show full text]
  • CPRSI Newsletter
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights CPRSI Newsletter August 1996 Vol.2 No. 4 A group numerically inferior to the rest of the population of the state, in a non-dominant position, whose members being nationals of the State - possess ethnic, religious or linguistic characteristics differing from those of the rest of the population and show, if only implicitly, a sense of solidarity, directed towards presenting their culture, traditions, religion or language. INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Editorial............................................................................................................................... The Travelling Communities - History, Culture and Educational Opportunities, by Arthur Ivatts ..................................................................................................................................... Roma As National Minority, by Noboru Miyawaki ............................................................... The Marginalisation of Gypsies (Exerts), by Helen O'Nions LL.M.................................... Czech Photoproject.............................................................................................................. Book reviews: Struggling for Ethnic Identity............................................................................................... The Great Gypsy Round-Up................................................................................................. Reports submitted to the CPRSI.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 2 • NUMBER 1 • 2019 Aims and Scope
    CRITICAL ROMANI STUDIES CRITICAL Volume 2 ■ Number 1 ■ 2019 Articles Timeo Danaos Blaming the Victim in Roma Inclusion Policies Csaba Fényes “They’re Saying That to Us?” The Unspeakable Racism of Spanish Gadjo Feminism Sarah Werner Boada A Transatlantic Perspective on Romani Thoughts, Movements, and Presence beyond Europe Esteban Acuña Cabanzo Nomads, “Gypsies,” and Criminals in England and India from the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Century Cristina-Ioana Dragomir Book Reviews Reni Eddo-Lodge. 2017. Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People about Race. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Izabella Anna Wódzka Sam Beck and Ana Ivasiuc, eds. 2018. Roma Activism: Reimagining Power and Knowledge. New York: Berghahn Books. Blair Biggar Arts and Culture Accessorizing (with) “Gypsyness” in the Twenty-first Century: 2 • NUMBER 1 2019 VOLUME Cultural Appropriations in the Fashion Industry Mihaela Moscaliuc VOLUME 2 • NUMBER 1 • 2019 Aims and Scope Critical Romani Studies is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal providing a forum for activist-scholars to critically examine racial oppressions, different forms of exclusion, inequalities, and human rights abuses of Roma. Without compromising academic standards of evidence collection Editors and analysis, the Journal seeks to create a platform to critically engage with academic knowledge production, and generate critical academic and policy Maria Bogdan knowledge targeting – amongst others – scholars, activists, and policymakers. Heidelberg University Scholarly expertise is a tool, rather than the end, for critical analysis of social Jekatyerina Dunajeva phenomena affecting Roma, contributing to the fight for social justice. The Journal Pázmány Péter Catholic University especially welcomes the cross-fertilization of Romani studies with the fields of critical race studies, gender and sexuality studies, critical policy studies, diaspora Tímea Junghaus studies, colonial studies, postcolonial studies, and studies of decolonization.
    [Show full text]
  • Austro-Hungarian Empire
    PROJECT EDUCATION OF ROMA | HISTORY ROMA CHILDREN COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L´EUROPE IN EUROPE AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN 3.1 EMPIRE Austro-Hungarian compiled by the editors Empire A New Method: Assimilation | The Four Decrees of Maria Theresia | Little Success | Failed Attempts in Spain and Germany Already at an early stage, people had tried to stop the Roma from living their way of life and culture. On a larger scale, however, policies of assimilation to the majority population were only pushed ahead by rulers in the Age of Enlightened Absolutism. Empress Maria Theresia and her son Joseph II in particular pursued programs which aimed at the Roma’s settlement and assimilation. Instead of physical violence a new form of cruelty was used in order to transform the uncontrollable and, to the state, unproductive “Gypsies” into settled, profitable subjects: the Roma were given land, they were no longer allowed to speak Romani and marry among each other, they were registered, and finally their children were taken away. However, these measures succeeded only in Western Hungary, today’s Austrian Burgenland and adjacent areas. In the other territories of the Empire, as well as in Spain and Germany, where the pressure for assimilation was likewise increased, the rulers’ policy of assimilation failed. COMITATUS MOSON INTRODUCTION (WIESELBURG) The Age of Enlightened Absolutism was characterised by essential changes in the sovereigns’ policies toward the “Gypsies”. In the face of the complete failure of all attempts to banish them COMITATUS permanently from their dominion, the SOPRON sovereigns of the Enlightenment were (ÖDENBURG) searching for new methods and ways to solve the “Gypsy problem” from the second half of the 18th century onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 and Minority Rights: Overview and Promising Practices
    HUMAN RIGHTS AT THE HEART OF RESPONSE TOPICS IN FOCUS COVID-19 AND MINORITY RIGHTS 4 JUNE 2020 COVID-19 AND MINORITY RIGHTS: OVERVIEW AND PROMISING PRACTICES WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON MINORITIES? COVID-19 has a broad range of disproportionate and adverse impacts upon national, ethnic, religious and linguistic minority communities. Some minority groups have suffered death rates several times higher than other groups during the pandemic. Emergency measures, including lockdowns, in response to COVID-19 have had a profound impact on people from minority groups, particularly migrants. Minority communities also face greater impacts from the economic downturn engendered by the pandemic. In countries where official data exist, a disproportionate number of deaths affecting minorities has been confirmed, revealing substantial, structural inequalities in society1. While COVID-19 poses a huge challenge to the whole of society, the impact on minorities can be more severe in a number of ways, and for a variety of reasons. Experiences differ, of course, between minority communities and in different contexts. But there are a number of areas of concern that have quickly emerged as particularly relevant for minorities in many locations. The pandemic has been most devastating for the lives, health and well-being of those with lower socio-economic status – a category that tracks closely with minority status in most countries2. In certain regions or countries, minorities are more likely to live in over-crowded housing conditions, making physical distancing and self- isolation more challenging, and some live in conditions with inadequate access to water and sanitation or where those utilities are communal.
    [Show full text]
  • Roma at a Glance
    ROMA AT A GLANCE OVERVIEW Roma have origins in North India, and scholars estimate that their migration happened more than million Roma worldwide a thousand years ago. 15 There are currently upwards of 15 million Roma living across the world. Roma are citizens of the countries they live in unless institutional barriers million Roma in Europe hinder it. 10-12 Throughout the centuries, a persistent mechanism of oppression has been established against Roma populations. In Europe, for more than seven centuries, Roma went from one harmful policy to million Roma in Latin America another: enslavement for 500 years in Romania, 1.5 mass killings during the Holocaust, forced assimilation until the early 2000s in some Central and Eastern European countries. million Roma in North America More so, the history and the collective memory 1 of domination and violence, and power imposed through enslavement, mass killings, expulsions, forced assimilation, or forced sterilization of Romani women, has received no recognition, but still informs the inequalities and the anti-Roma thousand Roma in Australia sentiments prevalent today. 100 Roma or the Romani people is an umbrella term for groups identified, amongst others, as Roma, Gitanos, Sinti, Manush. Oftentimes, they are pejoratively called “Gypsies”. one in every four The ideas of “Gypsy criminality” and “Gypsy Roma in the EU has been discriminated against in the inferiority” have been embedded in European 1 culture. past year because of their ethnicity. 1 2016 FRA survey Across EU countries, only 1% of the Roma are enrolled in third-level education and only 12% in secondary education. In southeastern Europe, only 18% of Roma attend secondary school vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Romani Language
    ROMANINET- A MULTIMEDIA ROMANI COURSE FOR PROMOTING LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY AND IMPROVING SOCIAL DIALOGUE: REPORT ON ROMANI LANGUAGE 1 Instituto de Enseñanza Secundaria Ribeira do Louro (Spain), Asesoramiento, Tecnología e Investigación S.L. (Spain), Fundación Secretariado Gitano (Spain), "ETHNOTOLERANCE" (Bulgary), Secretariado Diocesano de Lisboa da Obra Pastoral dos Ciganos (Portugal), Grup Scolar Industrial Victor Jinga (Romania), SC CONCEPT CONSULTING SRL (România), University of Manchester (United Kingdom) CONTENT REPORT ON ROMANI LANGUAGE .................................................................2 1. Spoken Dialects ...................................................................................2 2. Geographical spread .............................................................................8 3. Users - by group and number ................................................................. 11 4. The place of the language in the European curriculum .................................. 13 5. Educational materials and other information sources available in Romani language18 2 Instituto de Enseñanza Secundaria Ribeira do Louro (Spain), Asesoramiento, Tecnología e Investigación S.L. (Spain), Fundación Secretariado Gitano (Spain), "ETHNOTOLERANCE" (Bulgary), Secretariado Diocesano de Lisboa da Obra Pastoral dos Ciganos (Portugal), Grup Scolar Industrial Victor Jinga (Romania), SC CONCEPT CONSULTING SRL (România), University of Manchester (United Kingdom) REPORT ON ROMANI LANGUAGE 1. Spoken Dialects A. Origins and attestation Romani
    [Show full text]
  • 21St Century Exclusion: Roma and Gypsy-Travellers in European
    Angus Bancroft (2005) Roma and Gypsy-Travellers in Europe: Modernity, Race, Space and Exclusion, Aldershot: Ashgate. Contents Chapter 1 Europe and its Internal Outsiders Chapter 2 Modernity, Space and the Outsider Chapter 3 The Gypsies Metamorphosed: Race, Racialization and Racial Action in Europe Chapter 4 Segregation of Roma and Gypsy-Travellers Chapter 5 The Law of the Land Chapter 6 A Panic in Perspective Chapter 7 Closed Spaces, Restricted Places Chapter 8 A ‘21st Century Racism’? Bibliography Index Chapter 1 Europe and its Internal Outsiders Introduction From the ‘forgotten Holocaust’ in the concentration camps of Nazi controlled Europe to the upsurge of racist violence that followed the fall of Communism and the naked hostility displayed towards them across the continent in the 21st Century, Europe has been a dangerous place for Roma and Gypsy-Travellers (‘Gypsies’). There are Roma and Gypsy-Travellers living in every country of Europe. They have been the object of persecution, and the subject of misrepresentation, for most of their history. They are amongst the most marginalized groups in European society, historically being on the receiving end of severe racism, social and economic disadvantage, and forced population displacement. Anti-Gypsy sentiment is present throughout Europe, in post-Communist countries such as Romania, in social democracies like Finland, in Britain, in France and so on. Opinion polls consistently show that they are held in lower esteem than other ethnic groups. Examples of these sentiments in action range from mob violence in Croatia to ‘no Travellers’ signs in pubs in Scotland. This book will examine the exclusion of Roma and Gypsy-Travellers in Europe.
    [Show full text]