DOCSLIB.ORG

Dati Di Traffico 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dati Di Traffico 2008 A cura di Patrizia Sapia Direzione Analisi Economiche T ra f f ico a erop ortu a l e Tav. GRA 1 Graduatoria degli scali italiani 2008 in base al numero totale di movimenti aerei commerciali Variazione Incidenza Totale movimenti Ripartizione (%) AEROPORTO 2007/2008 sul totale (numero) (%) (%) Nazionale Internazionale 1 ROMA FIUMICINO 340.971 3,9 23,2 45,3 54,7 2 MILANO MALPENSA 212.841 -19,3 14,5 11,4 88,6 3 MILANO LINATE 96.823 -3,6 6,6 69,2 30,8 4 VENEZIA 73.744 -8,8 5,0 25,2 74,8 % BERGAMO 61.980 5,7 4,2 21,4 78,6 " NAPOLI 60.448 -3,7 4,1 59,7 40,3 7 BOLOGNA 56.993 -7,5 3,9 31,4 68,6 CATANIA 56.704 -4,4 3,9 78,4 21,6 9 ROMA CIAMPINO 51.275 -12,2 3,5 28,1 71,9 10 TORINO 48.797 -5,2 3,3 49,3 50,7 11 PALERMO 47.120 -4,0 3,2 83,0 17,0 12 PISA 37.887 -1,4 2,6 30,6 69,4 13 VERONA 36.362 -6,5 2,5 39,1 60,9 14 FIRENZE 35.305 1,8 2,4 28,5 71,5 15 CAGLIARI 33.824 7,3 2,3 84,2 15,8 16 BARI 29.362 5,1 2,0 77,1 22,9 17 OLBIA 18.323 -7,7 1,2 68,5 31,5 18 GENOVA 18.322 -2,4 1,2 57,4 42,6 19 TRIESTE 14.731 23,8 1,0 55,5 44,5 20 LAMEZIA TERME 14.076 1,5 1,0 83,1 16,9 21 ALGHERO 13.844 6,7 0,9 68,2 31,8 22 TREVISO 13.651 6,7 0,9 15,8 84,2 23 ANCONA 12.518 -11,0 0,9 57,3 42,7 24 BRINDISI 11.321 17,4 0,8 83,2 16,8 25 BRESCIA 9.763 34,3 0,7 78,2 21,8 26 REGGIO CALABRIA 7.160 -16,9 0,5 71,3 28,7 27 TRAPANI 7.040 -13,3 0,5 78,7 21,3 28 PESCARA 6.556 -13,1 0,4 53,4 46,6 29 FORLI 6.274 2,1 0,4 36,5 63,5 30 PARMA 5.706 18,7 0,4 71,4 28,6 31 RIMINI 5.381 -10,7 0,4 36,2 63,8 32 PANTELLERIA 4.047 -16,9 0,3 100,0 0,0 33 PERUGIA 3.446 8,1 0,2 57,5 42,5 34 LAMPEDUSA 3.326 -1,6 0,2 100,0 0,0 35 BOLZANO 3.125 -8,7 0,2 84,5 15,5 36 FOGGIA 2.916 41,9 0,2 97,7 2,3 37 CUNEO 1.694 87,6 0,1 51,7 48,3 38 CROTONE 1.327 -20,1 0,1 100,0 0,0 39 GROSSETO 908 38,8 0,1 89,0 11,0 40 SALERNO % - 0,0 83,7 16,3 41 ELBA 563 -32,6 0,0 44,0 56,0 42 ALBENGA 514 -55,5 0,0 47,3 52,7 43 SIENA 462 -18,7 0,0 62,3 37,7 44 TORTOLI 366 -34,2 0,0 83,6 16,4 45 AOSTA 291 -64,0 0,0 94,5 5,5 46 TARANTO 143 -24,7 0,0 65,7 34,3 47 VICENZA 62 -85,6 0,0 64,5 35,5 TOTALE 1.468.880 -4,2 100,0 45,0 55,0 Tav. GRA 2 Graduatoria degli scali italiani 2008 in base al numero totale di passeggeri trasportati sui servizi aerei commerciali Variazione Incidenza sul Totale passeggeri Ripartizione (%) AEROPORTO 2007/2008 totale (numero) (%) (%) Nazionale Internazionale 1 ROMA FIUMICINO 34.815.230 7,2 26,2 38,7 61,3 2 MILANO MALPENSA 19.014.186 -19,8 14,3 9,1 90,9 3 MILANO LINATE 9.264.561 -6,7 7,0 72,4 27,6 4 VENEZIA 6.848.244 -2,6 5,2 24,5 75,5 % BERGAMO 6.462.591 13,0 4,9 17,9 82,1 " CATANIA 6.020.606 -0,4 4,5 78,1 21,9 7 NAPOLI 5.594.043 -2,2 4,2 53,9 46,1 ROMA CIAMPINO 4.778.059 -11,3 3,6 12,8 87,2 9 PALERMO 4.424.867 -1,4 3,3 81,1 18,9 10 BOLOGNA 4.124.298 -3,0 3,1 31,7 68,3 11 PISA 3.940.490 6,2 3,0 24,1 75,9 12 TORINO 3.402.047 -2,4 2,6 58,1 41,9 13 VERONA 3.366.766 -2,8 2,5 39,0 61,0 14 CAGLIARI 2.924.805 10,4 2,2 83,3 16,7 15 BARI 2.465.539 5,2 1,9 74,4 25,6 16 FIRENZE 1.926.837 0,9 1,4 27,4 72,6 17 OLBIA 1.739.619 -0,1 1,3 65,2 34,8 18 TREVISO 1.697.720 10,3 1,3 12,8 87,2 19 LAMEZIA TERME 1.495.421 3,4 1,1 79,6 20,4 20 ALGHERO 1.383.296 6,2 1,0 59,4 40,6 21 GENOVA 1.170.163 5,8 0,9 62,1 37,9 22 BRINDISI 967.546 5,0 0,7 87,3 12,7 23 TRIESTE 776.757 5,6 0,6 56,9 43,1 24 FORLI 772.078 8,4 0,6 33,2 66,8 25 TRAPANI 530.779 4,9 0,4 63,8 36,2 26 REGGIO CALABRIA 491.302 -10,5 0,4 93,5 6,5 27 RIMINI 417.879 -13,7 0,3 8,9 91,1 28 ANCONA 406.292 -15,1 0,3 34,7 65,3 29 PESCARA 396.188 8,9 0,3 27,7 72,3 30 PARMA 285.409 100,4 0,2 69,4 30,6 31 BRESCIA 253.598 37,4 0,2 33,4 66,6 32 LAMPEDUSA 208.567 10,5 0,2 100,0 0,0 33 PANTELLERIA 153.268 -7,6 0,1 100,0 0,0 34 PERUGIA 110.879 19,2 0,1 22,3 77,7 35 CROTONE 89.330 -15,7 0,1 100,0 0,0 36 CUNEO 79.379 43,1 0,1 12,3 87,7 37 BOLZANO 64.554 -13,1 0,0 86,6 13,4 38 FOGGIA 29.231 278,3 0,0 99,7 0,3 39 TORTOLI 17.229 -32,9 0,0 87,1 12,9 40 SALERNO 18.067 - 0,0 84,8 15,2 41 ELBA 10.360 -16,4 0,0 15,7 84,3 42 GROSSETO 5.627 226,4 0,0 28,9 71,1 43 AOSTA 3.057 -68,6 0,0 98,8 1,2 44 TARANTO 2.900 -9,3 0,0 84,5 15,5 45 ALBENGA 1.841 -89,8 0,0 48,7 51,3 46 SIENA 798 -26,3 0,0 52,8 47,2 47 VICENZA 99 -86,9 0,0 51,5 48,5 TOTALE 132.952.402 -1,7 100,0 41,1 58,9 Tav. GRA 3 Graduatoria degli scali italiani 2008 in base al totale cargo trasportato sui servizi aerei commerciali Variazione Incidenza sul Ripartizione (%) Totale cargo AEROPORTO 2007/2008 totale (tonnellate) (%) (%) Nazionale Internazionale 1 MILANO MALPENSA 415.952 -14,5 47,1 0,6 99,4 2 ROMA FIUMICINO 153.026 -0,9 17,3 11,7 88,3 3 BERGAMO 122.213 -8,8 13,8 13,4 86,6 4 BRESCIA 36.770 -21,7 4,2 65,4 34,6 % BOLOGNA 26.467 41,6 3,0 48,1 51,9 " VENEZIA 22.660 74,3 2,6 6,2 93,8 7 MILANO LINATE 20.007 -14,8 2,3 19,8 80,2 ROMA CIAMPINO 19.644 -14,6 2,2 0,3 99,7 9 PISA 9.824 -24,5 1,1 72,0 28,0 10 CATANIA 8.777 -0,3 1,0 75,6 24,4 11 TREVISO 8.647 -50,8 1,0 38,1 61,9 12 ANCONA 6.430 6,5 0,7 82,8 17,2 13 CAGLIARI 4.901 -2,1 0,6 95,0 5,0 14 PALERMO 4.320 -1,4 0,5 91,0 9,0 15 BARI 3.888 -3,8 0,4 98,9 1,1 16 NAPOLI 3.619 -25,9 0,4 9,6 90,4 17 PESCARA 3.338 1,4 0,4 57,1 42,9 18 TORINO 2.899 -4,6 0,3 67,1 32,9 19 LAMEZIA TERME 1.978 -4,9 0,2 100,0 0,0 20 VERONA 1.890 125,0 0,2 18,1 81,9 21 RIMINI 1.881 17,9 0,2 1,3 98,7 22 GENOVA 1.449 -0,3 0,2 87,5 12,5 23 ALGHERO 1.307 69,5 0,1 100,0 0,0 24 OLBIA 802 -46,7 0,1 97,8 2,2 25 TARANTO 378 32,2 0,0 0,0 100,0 26 TRIESTE 188 -50,3 0,0 67,0 33,0 27 REGGIO CALABRIA 180 -46,3 0,0 100,0 0,0 28 BRINDISI 131 -48,8 0,0 93,9 6,1 29 FIRENZE % 28,8 0,0 72,9 27,1 30 PANTELLERIA 79 -4,8 0,0 100,0 0,0 31 LAMPEDUSA 47 235,7 0,0 100,0 0,0 32 TRAPANI 27 - 0,0 59,3 40,7 33 FORLI 4 -89,2 0,0 100,0 0,0 34 CUNEO 6 -100,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 35 CROTONE 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 36 ELBA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 37 FOGGIA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 38 ALBENGA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 39 BOLZANO 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 40 VICENZA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 41 BIELLA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 42 PARMA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 43 PERUGIA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 44 AOSTA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 45 TORTOLI 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 46 SIENA 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 47 SALERNO 6 - 0,0 0,0 0,0 TOTALE 883.808 -9,9 100,0 14,0 86,0 Tav.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 1 Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research December 2008 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Petra Kokus, Dr. Peter Meincke, Holger Pabst, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2007 2008-12-02 Release: 2.2 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2007 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 2.2 Save date: 2008-12-02 Total pages: 222 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 1.2 2008-06-20 Final Report 2.0 2008-10-10 chapters 1,2,3 Final Report - full year 2007 draft 2.1 2008-11-20 chapters 1,2,3,5 Final updated Report 2.2 2008-12-02 all Layout items Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenth Session of the Statistics Division
    STA/10-WP/6 International Civil Aviation Organization 2/10/09 WORKING PAPER TENTH SESSION OF THE STATISTICS DIVISION Montréal, 23 to 27 November 2009 Agenda Item 1: Civil aviation statistics — ICAO classification and definition REVIEW OF DEFINITIONS OF DOMESTIC AND CABOTAGE AIR SERVICES (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY Currently, ICAO uses two different definitions to identify the traffic of domestic flight sectors of international flights; one used by the Statistics Programme, based on the nature of a flight stage, and the other, used for the economic studies on air transport, based on the origin and final destination of a flight (with one or more flight stages). Both definitions have their shortcomings and may affect traffic forecasts produced by ICAO for domestic operations. A similar situation arises with the current inclusion of cabotage services under international operations. After reviewing these issues, the Fourteenth Meeting of the Statistics Panel (STAP/14) agreed to recommend that no changes be made to the current definitions and instructions. Action by the division is in paragraph 5. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In its activities in the field of air transport economics and statistics, ICAO is currently using two different definitions to identify the domestic services of an air carrier. The first one used by the Statistics Programme has been reaffirmed and clarified during Ninth Meeting of the Statistics Division (STA/9) and it is the one currently shown in the Air Transport Reporting Forms. The second one is being used by the Secretariat in the studies on international airline operating economics which have been carried out since 1976 and in pursuance of Assembly Resolution A36-15, Appendix G (reproduced in Appendix A).
    [Show full text]
  • Elenco Codici IATA Delle Compagnie Aeree
    Elenco codici IATA delle compagnie aeree. OGNI COMPAGNIA AEREA HA UN CODICE IATA Un elenco dei codici ATA delle compagnie aeree è uno strumento fondamentale, per chi lavora in agenzia viaggi e nel settore del turismo in generale. Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree, costituito da due lettere, indica un determinato vettore aereo. Ad esempio, è utilizzato nelle prime due lettere del codice di un volo: – AZ 502, AZ indica la compagnia aerea Alitalia. – FR 4844, FR indica la compagnia aerea Ryanair -AF 567, AF, indica la compagnia aerea Air France Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree è utilizzato per scopi commerciali, nell’ambito di una prenotazione, orari (ad esempio nel tabellone partenza e arrivi in aeroporto) , biglietti , tariffe , lettere di trasporto aereo e bagagli Di seguito, per una visione di insieme, una lista in ordine alfabetico dei codici di molte compagnie aeree di tutto il mondo. Per una ricerca più rapida e precisa, potete cliccare il tasto Ctrl ed f contemporaneamente. Se non doveste trovare un codice IATA di una compagnia aerea in questa lista, ecco la pagina del sito dell’organizzazione Di seguito le sigle iata degli aeroporti di tutto il mondo ELENCO CODICI IATA COMPAGNIE AEREE: 0A – Amber Air (Lituania) 0B – Blue Air (Romania) 0J – Jetclub (Svizzera) 1A – Amadeus Global Travel Distribution (Spagna) 1B – Abacus International (Singapore) 1C – Electronic Data Systems (Svizzera) 1D – Radixx Solutions International (USA) 1E – Travelsky Technology (Cina) 1F – INFINI Travel Information (Giappone) G – Galileo International
    [Show full text]
  • Abelag Aviation Aigle Azur Transports Aeriens Air
    COMITÉ DE COORDINATION DES AÉROPORTS FRANÇAIS FRENCH AIRPORTS COORDINATION COMMITTEE Membres au 1er septembre 2016 Members on September 1st 2016 Transporteurs aériens - Air carriers : AAF ABELAG AVIATION AAL AIGLE AZUR TRANSPORTS AERIENS AAR AIR ATLANTIQUE ABW AMERICAN AIRLINES ACA AMSTERDAM AIRLINES ADR ASIANA AIRLINES AEA AFRIQIYAH AIRWAYS AEE AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC AFL AIR CONTRACTORS LTD AFR AIRBRIDGE CARGO AHY ABX AIR AIC AIR ARABIA AIZ AIR CANADA ALK AIR ORIENT AMC ITALI AIRLINES AMX ANTONOV AIRLINES ANA AIR ONE ANE ALYZIA ASSISTANCE ADP ASL ADRIA AIRWAYS AUA AIR EUROPA AUI AEGEAN AIRLINES AZA AIR ITALY POLSKA BAW STEVE TEST TO KEEP BCS ASTRAEUS BEE AEROSVIT AIRLINES BEL AIR ITALY BER AIR FRANCE HANDLING BIE AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES BMR AIR FRANCE BMS AZERBAIJAN AIRLINES BOS AVIES BRU AIRBUS INDUSTRIE BTI AIR INDIA CAI AIR GABON INTERNATIONAL CAJ ARKIA ISRAELI AIRLINES CCA YAK SERVICE AIRLINES CCM SRILANKAN AIRLINES CES HEWA BORA CFE ALYSAIR aviation generale CHH AIR MALTA CLG AMERICAN TRANSAIR CPA AMC AVIATION CRC AEROMEXICO CRL ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CSA AIR NOSTRUM CSN AIR NIGERIA CTN YANAIR CUB AIR NEW ZEALAND DAH AEOLIAN AIRLINES DAL CODE ASSISTANT AVIAPARTNER DJT ARIK INTERNATIONAL DLH ATA AEROCONDOR DTH AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS EIN AIR ARMENIA ELL SMARTLYNX ITALIA ELY ARAVCO LTD ETD AirSERBIA ETH AVANTI AIR EVA AUSTRIAN AIRLINES EWG AUGSBURG AIRWAYS EZE UKRAINE INTL AIRLINES EZS AURIGNY AIR SERVICES EZY TITAN AIRWAYS FDX US AIRWAYS FHY AIR INDIA EXPRESS FIN AIR EXPLORE FPO ATLANT-SOYUZ FWI ALITALIA GFA ARCUS AIR GMI ASTRA AIRLINES
    [Show full text]
  • 16325/09 ADD 1 GW/Ay 1 DG C III COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 November 2009 THE EUROPEAN UNION 16325/09 ADD 1 AVIATION 191 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 18 November 2009 to: Mr Javier SOLANA, Secretary-General/High Representative Subject: Commission staff working document accompanying the report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council European Community SAFA Programme Aggregated information report (01 january 2008 to 31 december 2008) Delegations will find attached Commission document SEC(2009) 1576 final. ________________________ Encl.: SEC(2009) 1576 final 16325/09 ADD 1 GW/ay 1 DG C III EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 18.11.2009 SEC(2009) 1576 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT accompanying the REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SAFA PROGRAMME AGGREGATED INFORMATION REPORT (01 January 2008 to 31 December 2008) [COM(2009) 627 final] EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT AGGREGATED INFORMATION REPORT (01 January 2008 to 31 December 2008) Appendix A – Data Collection by SAFA Programme Participating States (January-December 2008) EU Member States No. No. Average no. of inspected No. Member State Inspections Findings items/inspection 1 Austria 310 429 41.37 2 Belgium 113 125 28.25 29.60 3 Bulgaria 10 18 4 Cyprus 20 11 42.50 5 Czech Republic 29 19 32.00 6 Denmark 60 16 39.60 7 Estonia 0 0 0 8 Finland 120 95 41.93 9 France 2,594 3,572 33.61 10 Germany 1,152 1,012 40.80 11 Greece 974 103 18.85 12 Hungary 7 9 26.57 13 Ireland 25 10 48.80 14 Italy 873 820 31.42 15 Latvia 30 34 30.20 16 Lithuania 12 9 48.08 17 Luxembourg 26 24 29.08 18 Malta 13 6 36.54 19 Netherlands 258 819 36.91 EN 2 EN 20 Poland 227 34 39.59 21 Portugal 53 98 46.51 22 Romania 171 80 28.37 23 Slovak Republic 13 5 23.69 24 Slovenia 19 8 27.00 25 Spain 1,230 2,227 39.51 26 Sweden 91 120 44.81 27 United Kingdom 610 445 39.65 Total 9,040 10,148 34.63 Non-EU ECAC SAFA Participating States No.
    [Show full text]
  • Luca Mancini
    Curriculum Vitae Luca Mancini PERSONAL INFORMATION Luca Mancini Address: P.za Gen. Carlo Alberto dalla Chiesa, 40 – 00054 Fiumicino (Rome) – ITALY Mobile: +39 328 3622407 e-mail : [email protected] D.O.B.: 11 FEB 1973 Nationality: Italian Sex: Male WORK EXPERIENCE September 2010 – today CAMO – Avionics & Electrical Systems – Manager DOA – Compliance Verification Engineer Meridiana Maintenance (Olbia – ITALY) In the frame of Meridiana Maintenance CAMO – Engineering Department, manages a team of engineers and is responsible for the engineering support concerning Avionics & Electrical Systems issues provided to customers operating several aircraft types (A320FAM, A330, MD80 and B717). Provided support concerns mandatory (Airworthiness Directives) and not mandatory (Service Bulletins, Service Letters, Operators Information Telex) documentation evaluation, issuing of CAMO documentation for modifications embodiment / inspections accomplishment, troubleshooting analysis in support to Maintenance Control Center / maintenance staff and Special Operations (LVP, RNAV, RVSM, ETOPS) technical management. As Area Manager also provides support to Training Department as technical instructor in the organization of internal aircraft type training. Starting from August 2011, in the frame of the new Meridiana Maintenance Design Organization approval, also hold the position of Compliance Verification Engineer in the design of changes to large aeroplanes concerning the installation of avionics equipment, associated systems and electrical systems. Main responsibilities are the approval of all compliance documents, including test programmes and data, necessary for the verification of compliance with the applicable CS and environmental protection requirements as well as the approval of the technical content (completeness, technical accuracy) of the manuals approved by the Agency (AFM, the ALS of the ICA and the CMR document).
    [Show full text]
  • Base Abandonments by Low-Cost Carriers
    Journal of Air Transport Management 55 (2016) 234e244 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Air Transport Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jairtraman Base abandonments by low-cost carriers * Paolo Malighetti, Stefano Paleari, Renato Redondi Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, Viale Pasubio 7/b, Dalmine 24044, Italy article info abstract Article history: This paper is the first attempt to systematically investigate the phenomenon of base abandonments by Received 8 February 2016 low-cost carriers (LCCs) in the world, from 1997 to 2014. Our results identify 109 cases where the LCCs Received in revised form decreased their presence in airports by at least 50 per cent in terms of offered seats. In 28 cases, the LCCs 8 April 2016 completely abandoned the airports. The incidence of downsizing is significantly reduced for important Accepted 11 June 2016 base airports. The abandonment by LCCs can be reversed, even though this is not very likely; in only 7.3 per cent of cases the same LCCs recovered full capacity. The impact on airports of LCC abandonments depends on the carrier level of dominance. The presence of middle size alternative airports increases the Keywords: Low-cost carriers likelihood of downsizings. © Base abandonment 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Based aircrafts Airport-airline relationship 1. Introduction power in switching is markedly on the LCC side. Indeed, some LCCs are famous for their occasionally aggressive A recent study on airport competition, the report commissioned approaches to obtain favourable deals with airports and other by ACI Europe to Copenhagen Economics (2012), discussed airline suppliers, and often we read newspaper reports about LCCs switching, that is the ability of an airline to relocate its services, as a threatening to abandon airports.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport: Annual Report 2005
    ANALYSIS OF THE EU AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY Final Report 2005 Contract no: TREN/05/MD/S07.52077 by Cranfield University Department of Air Transport Analysis of the EU Air Transport Industry, 2005 1 CONTENTS 1 AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY OVERVIEW......................................................................................11 2 REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS.....................................................................................................19 3 CAPACITY ............................................................................................................................................25 4. AIR TRAFFIC........................................................................................................................................36 5. AIRLINE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE............................................................................................54 6. AIRPORTS.............................................................................................................................................85 7 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................................................................................................102 8. THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................110 9 CONSUMER ISSUES..........................................................................................................................117 10 AIRLINE ALLIANCES .......................................................................................................................124
    [Show full text]
  • Jetstream 08/2010
    08 INTERNATIONALES LUFTFAHRTMAGAZIN 50. JahrgangJANUAR 2010 9 771424 493006 08/10 AUGUST 2010 Schweiz CHF 8.50 Europa EUR 6.00 50 50 5050 50 50 50www.jetstream.ch 505050 Sao Paolo Guarulhos Seattle: Stadt der Jets Titelstory: Lufthansa August-Poster: Trans Northern Super DC-3 im Anflug auf Anchorage NEWS | DEUTSCHLAND AUGUST 2010 Lassen Sie die NEWS < TITELBILD Schweiz 2 coolen Bilder Das neue Flaggschiff der Lufthansa ist der Deutschland 18 Airbus A380. Die erste Maschine, D-AIMA, Österreich 22 startet hier in Köln (Rainer Bexten, Köln, nicht davonfliegen. Frankreich / Italien 29 3.6.10). Europa 46 USA / Kanada 46 Lateinamerika 48 Abonnieren Sie jetstream. Afrika / Nahost / Asien / Ozeanien 48 AIRLINE: LUFTHANSA > Tom Ziegler zeigt die Meilensteine der neuen deutschen Lufthansa seit 1955 bis Im Abo günstiger! zum A380 auf. 6 Probeabo unter: www.jetstream.ch < FOTOBERICHT: SAO PAOLO Alexandre Polati und Joao Ricardo Franca Pinto, zwei Lokalmatadoren aus Sao Paolo, Redaktion zeigen Bilder des Flughafens Guarulhos. Moritz Herrmann [email protected] Milo Kalberer [email protected] Lukas Lusser [email protected] 30 Michael Pellaton [email protected] Mitarbeiter Abos Doris Kalberer • Dispo Michael Pellaton • Europa Felix Gasser • Finanzen Karl Freund, Hanspeter Roth • Bildredak- REISE: Seattle, StaDT DER JETS > tion Urs Diener, Roli Büsser, Francesco Frasa, Olav Rhensius, Benjamin Schudel, Mike Steffen • International Ernst Sommer • Layout Milo Kalberer • Reiseberichte Romano Germann, Lukas Lusser beleuchtet
    [Show full text]
  • GSA (General Sales Agent): Cos’È E Cosa Fa
    Cosa e quali sono le Alleanze aeree? Oltre la metà del trasporto aereo mondiale è nelle mani delle compagnie aeree aderenti alle alleanze. Cosa sono le alleanze aeree e perchè sono nate? La necessità da parte del passeggero di raggiungere ogni parte del mondo e quella per i vettori aerei di ridurre i costi , pur offrendo un alto livello di sicurezza e servizi, hanno fatto si che le compagnie aeree hanno stipulato tra loro degli accordi. Questi accordi hanno dato origine a gruppi distinti di compagnie , le cosiddette Alleanze aeree. Quali sono i vantaggi delle alleanze aeree per le compagnie e i passeggeri? Strettamente correlato alle alleanze aeree vi sono i concetti di code sharing e slot aereo. I vettori aerei appartenenti alla stessa alleanza possono abbattere i costi condividendo le spese per: Vendita biglietteria Personale a terra e all’ufficio check-in Gestione infrastrutture Servizi catering a bordo Vantaggi passeggeri: Prezzi più bassi dei biglietti aerei Partenze più frequenti per raggiunggere una determinata destinazione Maggior numero di destinazioni raggiungibili bonus derivanti dai programmi di fedeltà.( ad esempio Millemiglia di Alitalia) *Le Alleanze aeree per il momento sono tre. Se vuoi vedere la lista aggiornata dei membri d ti consiglio di cliccare nei link subito sotto, ognuno è collegato al sito della rispettiva alleanza STAR Codice Vettore Aereo ALLIANCE IATA Paese (sede) Slovenia Adria JP Grecia Aegean A3 Canada Air Canada AC Cina Air China CA India Air India AI Nuova Zelanda Air New Zealand NZ Giappone ANA NH Corea
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Statistics 2009
    “Falcone e Borsellino Airport” TRAFFIC STATISTICS JAN-DIC 2009 DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC SCHEDULED AND NON SCHEDULED FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 46.780 4.350.563 93,00 % CHG 2008/09 + 3,88% - 1,62% -5,30% SCHEDULED FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 45.188 4.161.679 92,10 % CHG 2008/09 + 5,40% -0,42% -5,52% NON SCHEDULED FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 1.592 188.884 118,65 % CHG 2008/09 -26,19% -22,19% + 5,43% SCHEDULED AND NON SCHEDULED COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC DOMESTIC FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 40.820 3.651.227 89,45 % CHG 2008/09 + 9,63% + 1,83% -7,12% INTERNATIONAL FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 5.960 699.336 117,34 % CHG 2008/09 -23,57% - 16,39% + 9,39% Of which INTRA - EU 5.113 633.362 123,87 % CHG 2008/09 - 21,69% - 15,04% + 8,49% Of which EXTRA - EU 847 65.974 77,89 % CHG 2008/09 - 33,25% - 27,46% + 8,69% TOP SCHEDULED AIRLINES AIRLINE PASSENGERS %CHG 2008/09 A/C MOVEMENTS %CHG 2008/09 ALITALIA 821.329 -17,81% 8.133 -11,42% WIND JET 801.916 -4,12% 8.443 10,79% AIR ONE 678.325 -16,46% 8.024 -22,78% EASYJET 484.171 76,31% 3.974 89,33% MERIDIANA 434.992 -2,65% 7.792 26,70% RYANAIR 302.709 59,11% 2.041 63,67% AIR BERLIN 171.845 -11,90% 1.452 -9,36% BLU EXPRESS 163.817 N/S 1.676 N/S VOLARE 65.357 16,79% 659 8,03% TRANSAVIA.COM 41.555 16,99% 290 10,69% VUELING AIRLINES 38.245 59,93% 322 62,63% EUROFLY 33.628 -64,83% 366 -53,90% TUNIS AIR 19.512 -17,63% 414 -13,75% XL AIRWAYS FRANCE 17.069 128,35% 140 141,38% IBERIA 10.488 55,59% 158 75,56% N/S Not Significant TOP NON SCHEDULED AIRLINES AIRLINE PASSENGERS %CHG 2008/09 A/C MOVEMENTS %CHG 2008/09 AIR MEDITERRANEE 55.020 2,74% 299 2,40% EUROPE AIRPOST 32.999 -4,09% 295 -3,91% MISTRAL AIR 25.051 -45,44% 267 -46,81% TRAVEL SERVICE 8.820 N/S 51 N/S CESKOSLOVENSKE AER.
    [Show full text]