DOCSLIB.ORG

6 X 10.5 Three Line Title.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6 X 10.5 Three Line Title.P65 Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81799-8 - The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century Sheri Berman Index More information Index Action Franc¸ais, 84–5 balance of class forces theory Adler-Karlsson, Gunnar, 184, 196 (Gleichgewicht der Klassenkrafte¨ ), “age of liberalism,” 12 99–100 Allemanists, 30 Barres,` Maurice, 82–4 ambivalent parliamentarism, 36 Bauer, Otto, 63–4, 99–100 Amsterdam congress (1904), Socialist Bebel, August, 36–7, 44–5, 55, 62, 92, International, 160 158 anti-Semitism, 89–93, 138–9 Beer Hall Putsch, 139 antisocialist laws Bernstein, Eduard, 8, 14–16, 21, 36, 47, in Germany (1878–1890), 35–6 115, 117, 121, 202, 207 in Italy, 52 Fabian Society lecture, 39 Arbetet (newspaper), 157 Lenin’s attacks on, 8 Auer, Ignaz, 45 on nationalism, 62 Austria, 97 revisionism and, 38–45 Brno (Brunn)¨ program (1899), 64 and Sorel’s views, 71–2 Christian Social Party, 93–5 Volkspartei (people’s party) strategy, Linz program, 93 99 municipal socialism program, 94 on workers and homeland, 60–1 universal suffrage reform (1906), Berth, Edouard,´ 81–2 94 Bissolati, Leonida, 57–8, 75 Austria-Hungary and democratic Blair, Tony, 211 revisionism, 59–65 Blanc, Louis, 34 Austrian Freedom Party, 215 Blanquists, 30 Austrian Socialist Party (SDAP), Bloc National, 101 99 Bloch, Joseph, 86–9 Brno (Brunn)¨ program (1899), 64 Blum, Leon,´ 100–1, 121–3, 193–4 Linz program, 93 Bolshevik revolution, 102, 106 Avanti! (newspaper), 77 Bolshevism, 99, 128, 130 Axelrod, Paul, 96 Bonomi, Ivanoe, 75–6, 106 Bordiga, Amadeo, 102, 105 Baade, Fritz, 111 Bos, Wouter, 216 Bad Godesberg program, 190–1 Bottai, Giuseppe, 135 219 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81799-8 - The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century Sheri Berman Index More information 220 Index Boulanger, Georges, 29 Copenhagen congress (1910), Socialist Boulanger crisis of 1889, 29 International, 64–5 Boulangism, 82–3 corporatism, 133–6 Brandt, Willy, 191 Corradini, Enrico, 78–9 Branting, Hjalmar, 152–8, 160–1, 164, Craxi, Bettino, 193 167 Crispi, Francesco, 52 Breslau congress (1895), SPD, 37–8 Croce, Benedetto, 51, 74, 78 Bretton Woods conference, 179 Croix de Feu (CF), 149, 151 Brno (Brunn)¨ program (1899), 64 Crosland, C. A. R., 181, 187 Brousse, Paul, 29 cross-class cooperation, 11, 14–16, 20, Bruning,¨ Heinrich, 109–12, 142 34, 52, 56, 60, 74, 88, 97, 116, Bulow,¨ Bernhard von, 58 150, 155, 160, 200, 203 Czech nationalism, 64–5 Cabrini, Angiolo, 75 Capital (Marx), 23, 69 D’Annunzio, Gabriele, 127 capitalism, 2–8, 109–15 D’Aragona, Ludovico, 104 de Man Plan, 115, 118–19, 186 Daladier, Edouard, 101, 120 in postwar era, 187 Danielsson, Axel, 154–5, 157–8 Catholic Mouvement Republican´ Darwinism, 25 Populaire, 178 Das Dritte Reich (The Third Reich) Catholic Popular Party (Italy), 103, (Moeller), 137 130 Daudet, Leon,´ 84 Centre Confederal´ d’Etudes´ Ouvrieres` David, Eduard, 37, 158 de la C. G. T., 121 de Man Plan, 115, 118–19, 186 Cercle Proudhon, 85 Deat,´ Marcel, 120–1, 125–6 Christian Democratic Union (CDU) decommodification, 181, 185, 196, 213 (Germany), 178, 191 Delegation des Gauches, 49 Christian Socialist Union (CSU) democratic revisionism, 14–16, 204, 209 (Germany), 191 in Austria, 59–65 Christian Social Party (Austria), 93–5 in France, 28–35, 48–50 class struggle, 12–15, 20–1, 26, 33, 42, in Germany, 54–9 48, 51, 96–7, 99, 116, 126 in Italy, 50–4 communism, 22–3, 67, 206 origins in Germany, 35–46 in France, 122, 194 in Sweden, 152–9 in Germany, 109, 114 depression, 10, 13, 26 in Italy, 105, 192–3 Der Moderne Kapitalismus (Sombart), Communist International, 105 90 Communist Manifesto, 61 Deutsche Demokratische Partei (DDP) Communist Party of Germany (KPD), (German Democratic Party) 137, 139, 141, 143 (Germany), 140 communitarianism, 8, 15, 120, 125–6, Deutschnationale Volkspartei (DNVP) 200, 204–7, 211, 214, 217 (German National People’s Party) Confederazione Generale dell’Industria (Germany), 140 Italiana (Confindustrio) (CGII), dictatorship of the proletariat, 102–3 133 Dresden congress (1903), SPD, 55–6 conservative revolution (Germany), Dresden resolution, 55–6 137 Dreyfus, Alfred, 31 Conservatives, Italian, 130 Dreyfus Affair, 31–2, 83–4 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81799-8 - The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century Sheri Berman Index More information Index 221 Economic Crisis, The (Wigforss), 170 Fascist Unions, Confederation of (Italy), economy 133 European Economic Cooperation, Fed´ eration´ des Travailleurs Socialistes de Committee of (1947 report), 177 France (Possibilists), 29–30 Fascist policies (Italy), 128–30, 132–3 Federzoni, Luigi, 79 industrialized nations, 89 Ferri, Enrico, 48, 50, 52–4 Nazi programs, 143–8, 187 First World War. See World War I and orthodox Marxism and, 21–2, 27 aftermath in postwar era, 179–88 Fortuyn, Pim, 216 Rehn-Meidner model, 185, 196–7 France, 20, 47, 100, 202 SAP economic policies, 167–75 all-socialist congress of 1899. See also embedded liberalism, 179, 201 specific parties Engels, Friedrich, 12, 21, 24–6, 30–1, 37, Boulangism, 82–3 50 de Man Plan, 115, 118–19, 186 ENI (Italy), 182 democratic revisionism in, 28–35, Erfurt program, 35–6, 189 48–50 Erhard, Ludwig, 187 election of 1899, 34 Erlander, Tage, 169, 196 elections of 1919–28, 101 Eucken, Walter, 187 elections of 1932, 120 Europe, changes from 1870–1900, 68 elections of 1936, 122 European Economic Cooperation, general strike in 1906, 82 Committee of (1947 report), integral nationalism, 84, 85 177 party unification after Amsterdam European Union (EU), 214 congress, 57 Evolutionary Socialism (Bernstein), postwar era, 178, 182, 186 44 and postwar social democracy, 193–5 Fabian Society, 39 revolutionary revisionism in, 81–86 Facta, Luigi, 130 right-wing groups (1920–30), 149–51 Faisceau (party), 149–50 syndicalism in, 81–2 Fasci di Combattimento, 127–8 French Communist Party (PCF), 100, fascism, 5, 16–17, 74 122, 194 dividing line between National French National Front, 215 Socialism, social democracy, and, French socialist parties 207 Allemanists, 30 and French right-wing groups all-socialist congress of 1899, 34–5 (1920–30), 149–51 Blanquists, 30 and National Socialism, 151 Fed´ eration´ des Travailleurs Socialistes similarities to social democracy and de France (Possibilists), 29–30 National Socialism, 16–17, Parti Ouvrier Franc¸ais (POF), 28–31, 205–6 34, 49 Fascist party in Italy, 105–6, 126–36 Boulanger crisis of 1889, 29 agrarian program (1921), 128 congress in Marsielles (1892), 30 congress in Rome (1921), 129 congress in Nantes (1894), 30 corporatism, 133–6 Parti Populaire Franc¸ais (PPF), 149 economic control of, 135 Parti Socialiste (PS), 194–5 economic policies, 128–30, 132–3 Parti Socialiste de France (PSF), 49, Fascist state, 132 120–1 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81799-8 - The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century Sheri Berman Index More information 222 Index French socialist parties (cont.) Germany, 21, 25–6, 47, 97, 202–3, Parti Socialiste Franc¸ais (PSF), 49–50, 205 149 antisocialist laws (1878–90), 35 congress (1903), 50 budget crisis (1909), 58 Parti Socialiste Ouvrier democratic revisionism in, 54–9 Revolutionnaire (POSR), 30 elections of 1928–30, 109 Section Franc¸aise de l’Internationale elections of 1912, 59 Ouvriere´ (SIFO), 57, 102, 120–1 elections of 1932, 114–15, 142–3 congress (1920), 100 elections of 1969, 191 congress (1945), 193 elections of June 1903, 55 congress (1946), 194 Gemeinschaft (community), 91 membership decline from 1946–60, GNP (1932–8), 146 194 Great Inflation, 140 and postwar social democracy, industrialization of, 89 193–5 national debt (1933–8), 144 Friedman, Thomas, 209 National Socialism in, 136–48 Nazi movement in, 109–15, 139–48 Gaulle, Charles de, 182 origins of democratic revisionist Gaullism, 194 theory, 46 gemeinschaft (community), 4, 91, 181, postwar era, 178, 183–4, 186–7 214 and postwar social democracy, 192 Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft revolutionary revisionism in, 86–95 (Community and Society) Verbande¨ (industrial associations), (Tonnies),¨ 4 183 German Socialist Party (SPD), 35–8, 43, Volksgemeinschaft, 87–8, 91, 147–8 45, 109–15, 141 Wandervogel, 91 Bad Godesberg program, 191 Weimar Republic, 16, 98–9, 114, 137, Breslau congress (1895), SPD, 37–8 143 CDU/CSU coalition, 191 Weltpolitik, 87 congress (1931), 110 WTB plan, 111–14, 141–2 congress in Wurzburg¨ (1917), 98 gesellschaft (society), 4, 91, 181 Dresden congress (1903), SPD, Giddens, Anthony, 211 55–6 Giolitti, Giovanni, 53–4, 57–8, 75, Dresden resolution, 56 105–6, 129 elections of 1907, 86 globalization, 27, 68, 201, 209–10, elections of 1912, 59 213 elections of 1932, 114–15, 142–3 progressive, 212 elections of 1969, 191 Gogh, Theo van, 216 elections of June 1903, 55 Gramsci, Antonio, 76, 104–6 Erfurt congress (1891), 35 Great Depression (1873–95), 25 Hanover congress (1899), 45 Great Depression (early 1930s), 97, post-1907 party conferences, 88 109–11, 119, 134, 141–3, 161, and postwar social democracy, 192 167, 169–70, 175, 177, 203 revisionist forces and, 89–90 Great Inflation (Germany), 140 Stuttgart congress (1898), 44 Great War and aftermath, 15, 57, 96–7, support of war effort, 89, 96 100, 102, 115, 126, 136, 203 Umbau der Wirtschaft (Reorganization Gregor, A. James, 204 of the Economy) program, 113 Guesde, Jules, 28–32, 34–5,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Historiography of Fascism
    History in the Making Volume 6 Article 5 2013 A Historiography of Fascism Glenn-Iain Steinback CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Steinback, Glenn-Iain (2013) "A Historiography of Fascism," History in the Making: Vol. 6 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol6/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles History Department’s 2013 Faculty Choice Award A Historiography of Fascism By Glenn-Iain Steinback Abstract: A long-standing historical debate revolves around the definition, fundamental nature and historical constraints of the concept of fascism. A wide array of scholarly questions about the political and ideological nature of fascism, the minimum or necessary traits of a fascist movement, arguments over the classification of semi-fascist groups and the concept of generic fascism characterize this debate. The result is a substantial body of scholarly research replete with competing theories for the evolution and origin of fascism as a concept, of individual fascist movements and even over the geographic and temporal application of the term itself within history. This paper is a historiography of fascist studies that illuminates the development of the scholarly narrative and understanding of fascism. Beginning with the historically contemporary Marxist perceptive of fascism, this paper examines competing and complimentary understandings of the phenomenon across the twentieth century, including various theories for the evolution of fascism in Europe, the relationship to and placement of fascism in the broader political spectrum, and the debate over fascism as a form of political religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Instituto Juan March Juan March Institute
    Instituto Juan March Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales (CEACS) Juan March Institute Center for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences (CEACS) No third way : a comparative perspective on the left Author(s): Lipset, Seymour Martin Date 1991 Type Working Paper Series Estudios = Working papers / Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales 16 (1991) City: Madrid Publisher: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales Your use of the CEACS Repository indicates your acceptance of individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any document(s) only for academic research and teaching purposes. NO THIRD WAY: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON THE LEFT Seymour Martin Lipset Estudio/Working Paper 1991/16 April 1991 Seymour Martin Lipset is Senior Fellow al the Hoover Institution (Stanford University) and Hazel Professor of Public Policy at George Mason University. This paper is an extended version of an oral presentation given by Professor Lipset at the Center for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences of the Juan March Institute (Madrid) in July 1990. -1- NO THIRD WAY: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON THE LEFT by Seymour Martin Lipset While the attention of the world has been focused on the startling transformations in the Communist world, equally important if less dramatic shifts have been occurring in the noncommunist parties of the Left. Although less noteworthy, since they do not involve revolutionary economic and political changes, they are as ideologically significant, for they represent a withdrawal from the centralized redistributionist doctrines of the democratic Left.1 Their record confirms the conclusion of Pierre Mauroy, Prime Minister of France’s first majority Socialist government, who noted in the Spring of 1990: “We thought we could find a third way, but it turned out there isn’t one.”2 In country after country, socialist and other left parties have taken the ideological road back to capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Social Democracy
    1 Understanding Social Democracy By Sheri Berman Associate Professor of Political Science Barnard College Columbia University 3009 Broadway New York, NY 10027-6598 (212) 854-2158 2 For the first half of the twentieth century, Europe was the most turbulent region on earth, convulsed by war, economic crisis, and social and political conflict. For the second half of the century, it was among the most placid, a study in harmony and prosperity. What changed? Two narratives commonly emerge in answer to this question. The first focuses on the struggle between democracy and its alternatives, pitting liberalism against fascism, National Socialism, and Marxist-Leninism. The second focuses on competition between capitalism and its alternatives, pitting liberals against socialists and communists. Democratic capitalism is simply the best, indeed the “natural” form of societal organization, these stories assert, and once Western Europe fully embraced it, all was well. This account obviously contains some truth: the century did witness a struggle between democracy and its enemies and the market and its alternatives. But it is only a partial truth, because it overlooks a crucial point: democracy and capitalism were historically at odds. An indispensable element of their joint victory, therefore, was the discovery of some way for them to coexist. In practice, that turned out to mean a willingness to use political power to protect citizens from the ravages of untrammeled markets. The ideology that triumphed was not liberalism, as the “End of History” folks would have it, it was social democracy. If this sounds surprising or overblown it is because social democracy rarely gets either the respect or in-depth ideological analysis it deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poverty of Philosophy and Its Contemporary Relevance
    Crisis, Revolution, and the Meaning of Progress: The Poverty of Philosophy and its Contemporary Relevance Michael Joseph Roberto Proudhon and Marx ABSTRACT: In 1847, Marx wrote The Poverty of Philosophy, his polemical response to Pierre Joseph Proudhon’s System of Economical Contradictions Or, The Philosophy of Poverty, published a year earlier. Marx and Proudhon were the principal antagonists in the struggle for influence and control of the emerging European workers movement then fueled by the first great crisis of modern capitalism. While Marx propagated communist revolution as a solution to the crisis, Proudhon sought to preserve “good capitalism” by attempting to formulate a new political economy that would reconcile contradictions of capitalist exchange by means of reciprocal agreements and transactions; in a word, mutualism. In The Poverty of Philosophy, Marx took Proudhon to task for creating a massive “dialectical phantasmagoria” in the System of Economical Contradictions. Usually regarded as his first detailed treatment of political economy, Marx’s book also contains an implicit conception of social and historical progress based on the principles of contradiction, paradox, and Copyright © 2009 by Michael Joseph Roberto and Cultural Logic, ISSN 1097-3087 Michael Joseph Roberto 2 practice. Today, as the U.S. experiences an irreversible and possibly terminal capitalist crisis, Marx’s polemic against Proudhon remains instructive as an historical, theoretical, and practical-political guide. Key features of the Marx- Proudhon divide in the 1840s are now being recast in contemporary guises and forms. The Left must distinguish between revolutionary Marxist solutions and variations of the New Proudhonism. While Marxism holds the potential for revolutionary, socialist transformation and renewed social progress, the New Proudhonism seeks to save “good capitalism” – ironically and tragically, carrying with it the plausibility of a more coercive and barbarous system.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert O. Paxton-The Anatomy of Fascism -Knopf
    Paxt_1400040949_8p_all_r1.qxd 1/30/04 4:38 PM Page b also by robert o. paxton French Peasant Fascism Europe in the Twentieth Century Vichy France: Old Guard and New Order, 1940–1944 Parades and Politics at Vichy Vichy France and the Jews (with Michael R. Marrus) Paxt_1400040949_8p_all_r1.qxd 1/30/04 4:38 PM Page i THE ANATOMY OF FASCISM Paxt_1400040949_8p_all_r1.qxd 1/30/04 4:38 PM Page ii Paxt_1400040949_8p_all_r1.qxd 1/30/04 4:38 PM Page iii THE ANATOMY OF FASCISM ROBERT O. PAXTON Alfred A. Knopf New York 2004 Paxt_1400040949_8p_all_r1.qxd 1/30/04 4:38 PM Page iv this is a borzoi book published by alfred a. knopf Copyright © 2004 by Robert O. Paxton All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Alfred A. Knopf, a division of Random House, Inc., New York, and simultaneously in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto. Distributed by Random House, Inc., New York. www.aaknopf.com Knopf, Borzoi Books, and the colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. isbn: 1-4000-4094-9 lc: 2004100489 Manufactured in the United States of America First Edition Paxt_1400040949_8p_all_r1.qxd 1/30/04 4:38 PM Page v To Sarah Paxt_1400040949_8p_all_r1.qxd 1/30/04 4:38 PM Page vi Paxt_1400040949_8p_all_r1.qxd 1/30/04 4:38 PM Page vii contents Preface xi chapter 1 Introduction 3 The Invention of Fascism 3 Images of Fascism 9 Strategies 15 Where Do We Go from Here? 20 chapter 2 Creating Fascist Movements 24 The Immediate Background 28 Intellectual, Cultural, and Emotional
    [Show full text]
  • 9ÐUAE Edpucrs AT\Itónio COSTA P¡NTO
    a F F ANTóNIO COSTA PINTO Série 5 z Monumenta -{ o. æ =o ô O Nacional-Sindicalismo de Rolão Preto, expressão do fas_ o cismo -{ enquanto movimento em Portugal, foi criado em Þ 1932, plena ! em transição para um regime autoritário, re- z -{ presentando o último combate de uma "família política,,que o desempenhou um papel importante no processo de crise e de derrube do liberalismo português, mas que foi secunda- rizada na edificação de uma alternativa ditatorial estável no o início dos anos 30, o Estado Novo de Salazar. tt, António Costa pinto ? lnstituto de Ciências Sociais, È Universidade de Lisboa ¿,-a Þ(/, t Þ A nova produção da série Monumenta traz ao público acadê- N mico brasileiro uma das principais obras da historiografia por- e tuguesa. Atualizada e preparada para o Brasil, a investigação ú, proporciona uma reflexão única sobre as práticas autoritárias Ð no contexto do período entre guerras, ampliando ainda mais o >¡- os entendimentos sobre o estudo das direitas enquanto obje- o ; to de reflexão historiográfica e categoria analítica. n m --l o q Leandro Pereira Gonçalves m l Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul T ô t¡ o a' m -o o 7 c-t cl I t- +I.+ rsBN 978-85-5526- 408-5 rsBN 978-85-397 -o7 4o-9 C rti:ffr ril ROLAO PRETO E O FASCISMO EM PORTUGAL EdPIJCRS "F o s Ê RS ,ililIJttlttru[|ruilt ,ililxlttuxruil[[ilill ã 7¿ 9ÐUAE edpucRs AT\ITóNIO COSTA P¡NTO U N IVE RS IDAD E DE PERNAMBUCO Pontiffcia Universiclade Católica clo Rio Grancle clo Sul Chanceler Dom Jaime Spengler Reitor Reitor Pedro Henrique Falcão Joaquim Clotet Vice-Reitor Vice-Reítor Socorro Cavalcanti Evilázio Teixeira Conselho editorial Conselho Editorial Adriana de Farias Gehrer Presidente ,{ Amaury de Medeiros Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy Alexandre Gusmâo Diretor da EDIPUCRS Gilberto Keller de Andrade Álvaro Vieira de Mello Editor- Chefe 3 Ana Célia O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Way at the Crossroads
    THOMAS MEYER The Third Way at the Crossroads he term Third Way in its most recent use was be a meaningful and highly informative endeavour Tcoined in 1992 by a group of policy consultants to renarrate the whole history of socialism as a to Bill Clinton and taken over by Tony Blair and sequence of ever renewed steps towards actualised his intellectual aids with new emphasis half a forms of syntheses between liberalism and social- decade later in order to brand a new centre-left ism prompted either by changes in social, eco- approach to what they consider the inevitable new nomic and political reality itself or the perception challenges of economic globalisation. It is by its of them by the mainstream socialists – and the authors understood as the opening move for a new constant rejection of such a synthesis by dogmatic wave of revisionism which aims at a new synthesis socialists and communists. between traditional social democracy and libera- Revisionist socialism as contrary to the dogma- lism in some of the key fields of social reform such tic version of marxism, from its very outset, always as governance, welfare state, education, political has seen itself as an open process of learning from culture and job creation in a new economy. The reality, from the results of its own endeavours in very brand-name and the new direction of political the different fields of society, but abiding without thinking for which it stands have proved highly compromise by the basic values of freedom, justice controversial in the short time since they have and solidarity as the unchangeable guidelines for entered the political arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the SPD Exiles in Scandinavia Failed to Persuade the Post-1945 SPD to Adopt the Ideas and Ideals of the Scandinavian Social Democrats
    Why the SPD exiles in Scandinavia failed to persuade the post-1945 SPD to adopt the ideas and ideals of the Scandinavian Social Democrats. The SPD exiles and the Scandinavian Social Democrats in the period 1933-1956. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY” by AMI VATURY Submitted to the Senate of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev 30 of August 2004 Beer-Sheva Why the SPD exiles in Scandinavia failed to persuade the post-1945 SPD to adopt the ideas and ideals of the Scandinavian Social Democrats. The SPD exiles and the Scandinavian Social Democrats in the period 1933-1956. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY” by AMI VATURY Submitted to the Senate of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Approved by the advisor Approved by the Dean of the Kreitman School of Advanced Graduate Studies 30 of August 2004 Beer-Sheva This work was carried out under the Supervision of Professor Frank Stern In the Department of History Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Table of Content Introduction Chapter A: The aims of the research, the existing scholarship in this area, 1 the nature of the sources and the structure of the dissertation. Chapter B: The development of SPD ‘pragmatism’ and Swedish Social 7 Democratic ‘reformism’ up to 1914. Chapter C: The development of the Swedish Social Democrats ‘Functional 19 Socialism’ from 1914 to 1956, and main similarities with the Danish and Norwegian Social Democratic parties. Part 1- Good Cooperation but only Limited Influence (The SPD Exiles and the Scandinavian Social Democrats up to 1940) Chapter 1.1: SPD ‘party ideology’ from 1920 to 1933 compared to the ‘party 40 Ideology’ of the Scandinavian Social Democrats; the role played by the most senior SPD exiles in Scandinavia (Fritz Tarnow and Kurt Heinig) during this period and their views regarding the ‘Weimar SPD party ideology’.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorrected Proof F.-X
    German Social Policy 5 Edited and introduced by Lutz Leisering PROOF UNCORRECTED German Social Policy Edited and introduced by Lutz Leisering The 5-volume series “German Social Policy” presents a unique multidisciplinary approach to the history of German social policy and is written by the doyens of their respective disciplines. The volumes expound the contribution of the German tradition to the rise of social policy in the Western world in the 19th and 20th centuries. Germany pioneered modern social policy in the 19th century when Bismarck introduced social insurance. After the Second World War, Germany’s Social Market Economy became a model of social integration. The volumes cover the history of ideas (volume 1), the legal and political history before and after 1945 (volumes 2 and 3), the German Democratic Republic (1949-1990) and the impact of German reunification (1990) (volume 4). Volume 5 embeds the German case in a major comparative study of European welfare states, complemented by a study of the USA and the Soviet Union. The volumes also yield insights into general theoretical issues of social policy beyond the empirical case of Germany. Each volume has an introduction by the editor who summarizes the contribution made by the volumes and looks into the future of German social policy. Volume 1: F.-X. Kaufmann: Thinking About Social Policy – The German Tradition 2013. ISBN 978-3-642-19500-6 Volume 2: M. Stolleis: Origins of the German Welfare State – Social Policy in Germany to 1945 2013. ISBN 978-3-642-22521-5 Volume 3: H.F. Zacher: Social Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany – The Constitution of the Social 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Cercle Proudhon, Entre Édouard Berth Et Georges Valois
    LE CERCLE PROUDHON, ENTRE EDOUARD BERTH ET GEORGES VALOIS A l’époque où il publie ses Méfaits des intellectuels , en 1914, la grande idée du très sorélien Edouard Berth, décrit par Yves Guchet comme le « plus remarquable peut-être des collaborateurs » des Cahiers du Cercle Proudhon 1, est que Maurras et Sorel se complètent l’un l’autre à la façon d’Apollon et de Dionysos. « L’Action française qui, avec Maurras, est une incarnation nouvelle de l’esprit apollinien, par sa collusion avec le syndicalisme qui, avec Sorel, représente l’esprit dionysien, écrit-il, va pouvoir enfanter un nouveau grand siècle , une de ces réussites historiques qui, après elles, laissent le monde longtemps ébloui et comme fasciné »2. Berth, on aura l’occasion de le voir, changera d’avis par la suite. Mais il ne fait pas de doute que cette conclusion correspond alors aux leçons qu’il a tirés de sa participation aux activités du Cercle Proudhon, cénacle entouré aujourd’hui, près d’un siècle plus tard, d’une sorte d’aura mythique, mais dont l’histoire et la signification exigent d’être mises en perspective de façon plus large. Le principal animateur du Cercle Proudhon n’a toutefois pas été Edouard Berth, mais Georges Valois, personnage atypique dont l’itinéraire, en dépit des quelques travaux qui lui ont été consacrés, reste encore trop peu connu. De l’anarchisme à l’Action française Georges Valois, de son vrai nom Alfred-Georges Gressent, est né le 7 octobre 1878 à Paris, dans une famille ouvrière et paysanne. Son père, un Normand venu s’installer comme boucher à Montrouge, meurt accidentellement trois ans plus tard.
    [Show full text]
  • Proudhon's Influence in Belgium: Nationalism and Culture
    Proudhon’s influence in Belgium: nationalism and culture Erik Buelinckx 2009 Contents Abstract 3 Proudhon in Belgium (1858–1862). Nationalism and Culture. 3 Proudhon’s influence in Belgium: nationalism and culture. 4 Introduction ................................. 4 Trialectics? .................................. 5 Proudhon and Belgium ........................... 6 Proudhon and religion ............................ 10 Proudhon and nationalism ......................... 11 Georges Sorel ................................. 13 Hendrik de Man ............................... 16 Rudolf Rocker ................................ 17 Conclusion .................................. 20 Key literature 21 2 Abstract Proudhon in Belgium (1858–1862). Nationalism and Culture. Erik Buelinckx will reflect on the influence Proudhon eventually had onright wing nationalism in Belgium and abroad. This influence can be retraced toa broader pilfering of Proudhon’s ideas to sustain far-right ideologies across Europe and is an important, if negative element of Proudhon’s legacy and one which must be engaged with. After bringing up the links Proudhon had with Belgium, theuse and abuse of some of his ideas on religion and nationalism will be presented, fol- lowed by his influence on Georges Sorel, Hendrik de Man and Rudolf Rocker, three, more or less forgotten, but in their time influential thinkers of the first halfofthe twentieth century. 3 Proudhon’s influence in Belgium: nationalism and culture. Introduction ‘The people has never done anything else but praying and paying: we believe the time has come to make them PHILOSOPHIZE’ (1860, v1, p. II). In Brussels, writing these lines for the new introduction to the second edition of his key work De la Justice dans la Révolution et dans l’Église, Proudhon could seem to be overly optimistic that during and after his lifetime, and at least regarding his own texts, this would show true.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascism in Europe, 1919-1945
    Fascism in Europe, 1919–1945 ‘An excellent brief survey of fascism which treats all the major themes and problems, and is highly recommended.’ Stanley Payne, University of Wisconsin-Madison ‘The first book which makes the era of fascism as a whole fully intelligible to the student and the general reader.’ Roger Griffin, Oxford Brookes University Fascism in Europe, 1919–1945 surveys the elusive and controversial phenom- enon which is still the object of interest and debate over fifty years after its defeat in the Second World War. It introduces recent scholarship and continuing debates on the nature of fascism as well as often contentious con- tributions by foreign historians and political scientists. From the pre-First World War intellectual origins of fascism to its demise in 1945, this book examines: • the two ‘waves’ of fascism – in the period immediately following the First World War and in the late 1920s and early 1930s; • whether the European crisis created by the Treaty of Versailles allowed fascism to take root; • why fascism came to power in Italy and Germany, but not anywhere else in Europe; • fascism’s own claim to be an international and internationalist move- ment; • the idea of ‘totalitarianism’ as the most useful and appropriate way of analysing the fascist regimes. With a timeline of key dates, maps, illustrations, a glossary and a guide to further reading, Fascism in Europe, 1919–1945 is an invaluable introduction to this fascinating political movement and ideology. Philip Morgan is Senior Lecturer in Contemporary European History at the University of Hull. His previous publications include Italian Fascism, 1919–1945 (1995) and Italy, 1915–1940 (1998).
    [Show full text]