DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction INTRODUCTION Other Transportation Documents This report is a TMP (Transportation Management Plan) for the This TMP is just one of several transportation new DC United Stadium in the Buzzard Point neighborhood of efforts/reports that will be performed for the new DC Washington, D.C. This TMP was prepared in coordination with a United Stadium. Other efforts will include a partnership between the District of Columbia government, Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) presented via an including the DC Department of Transportation (DDOT), and Environmental Mitigation Study (EMS) and a the ownership of the DC United professional soccer club. Transportation Operations Plan (TOP). This TMP document is a planning-level report that summarizes The TIA will contain a detailed technical review of the travel characteristics of Stadium patrons, reviews intersection capacity, as well as impacts to other modes of travel on game-days. It is intended to identify comparable stadiums, and outlines recommendations for each the amount of additional transportation activity mode of transportation for accommodating game-day expected during game-days and will recommend transportation needs. It is intended to be the guiding document mitigation measures to alleviate concerns. This will be that outlines transportation strategies that other included in the EMS for the new Stadium. This TMP transportation efforts and actions follow. As such, it will be document will be coordinated with the TIA by providing updated several times prior to the expected inaugural season in information on patron travel characteristics and strategies to manage demand. 2017. The TOP, prepared closer to the stadium’s opening, This report is written assuming that the new DC United Stadium acts as an operations “how to” manual. It details will accommodate 20,000 patrons, although the Stadium has special measures on game days, including signs, special yet to be designed; current estimates of the Stadium’s capacity traffic operations, and traffic control officer locations range from 18,000 to 20,000. In addition, this study assumes and duties. It is a detailed list of operational measures the Stadium begins operations in the Spring of 2017, in time for that happen on game-days. The TOP is intended to be a the Major League Soccer (MLS) season. Overall, this study aims living document, so it always reflects current Stadium conditions. As future projects and developments, such to provide all patrons with a positive game-day experience by as the South Capitol Street improvements are minimizing vehicular impacts, promoting transit as an attractive completed and future transit service is added, the TOP mode of transportation, and providing a safe and effective bike will be revised to reflect the changes to the area. In and pedestrian environment, all while minimizing the impacts addition, transportation operations at the new Stadium to surrounding neighborhoods. will be monitored by DDOT and DC United over the first several seasons and changes will be made to the TOP This TMP is broken into the following sections: based on these findings. Site Review: This section reviews the site location, In addition to the transportation documents prepared specifically for the DC United Stadium, the District identifying the advantages and disadvantages it offers. recently completed the SE/SW Special Events Study, Included in this section is a list of planned developments which reviewed the long-term impacts of the new and District infrastructure projects in the area, as well as soccer stadium in conjunction with other large event projected site conditions in 2017 and beyond. venues (Nationals Park and Wharf Hall) for the year Comparables Review: This section provides background on 2035. The Study found that if there were simultaneous Major League Soccer (MLS) and the other stadium facilities events on weeknights at all of the venues, the throughout the league. It contains a list of MLS stadia roadways and transit systems would be over capacity. However, if events were to occur individually they transportation features and draws conclusions on how would generate a manageable amount of elements from these venues could be brought to the DC transportation activity with the use of Traffic Control United Stadium. Officer (TCOs) stationed at critical intersections. Event Patron Profile: This section reviews existing data from soccer games at RFK and the proposed list of events at the new Stadium. Using the data, this section also 1 derives a projected game-day travel profile for the new These existing facilities can aid significantly in accommodating Stadium. These projections will drive the development of patrons of the new Stadium. solutions to accommodate patrons by mode. Also incorporated into this section is a review of how often SITE CONCERNS soccer and baseball games overlapped between RFK and Although Buzzard Point has quality regional transportation Nationals’ Park in the last few seasons. access, reaching the proposed site within Buzzard Point is not Management Plan Concepts: This section reviews each as direct. Figure 2 summarizes some concerns regarding the mode of travel and presents solutions to accommodate site. demand on game-days. Recommendations are split between high- and low-priority, and within three First, the roadways in the area south of M Street SW and west categories: (1) infrastructure, (2) operations, and (3) of South Capitol Street have been developed in a manner that marketing. The section begins with a discussion of general deters traffic from entering. These traffic measures include strategies that overarch each mode and then provides signs indicating that only local traffic should enter the area sections on parking, vehicular routing, transit, pedestrian, from the north and prohibiting left turns while traveling and bicycles. northbound on South Capitol Street. The objectives of these Marketing Opportunities: This section summarizes all of deterrents are to protect the residential community that exists the marketing recommendations presented so far and north of the proposed site and minimize cut-through traffic identifies opportunities to work with new technologies, from regional commuters. including tablet/phone apps and website strategies. Next Steps and Implementation: The TMP ends with a Approach and departure routes to parking locations will need summary of thoughts on how each of the strategies to be planned carefully to minimize disruptions to the contained within this report should be implemented over residential community. This will become less difficult once the next several years. Site Review construction of the proposed South Capitol Street and Potomac Avenue traffic oval is completed (details presented below), as This section reviews the site location, identifying the that will become a proper gateway to the Buzzard Point site advantages and disadvantages it offers. Included in this section that does not require travel through the residential community. is a list of planned developments and District infrastructure In addition, the Navy Yard Metrorail Station is the preferred projects in the area. This section also projects site conditions in transit portal because walking routes between the Waterfront 2017 and beyond. Metrorail station and the proposed site will be primarily along residential streets. EXISTING FEATURES Several major transportation facilities surround Buzzard Point, Second, the major transportation features in near providing many high quality connections between the site area Southeast/Southwest, such as the parking lots serving and regional destinations. Figure 1 contains a summary of Nationals’ Park and the Metrorail station portals, are mostly these facilities. These include the Navy Yard and Waterfront within a 10-15 minute walk from the proposed site, about 5 Metrorail stations, served by the Green Line, and several minutes longer than the walk between RFK and the highways, such as the SE/SW Freeway, I-395, I-295, and Stadium/Armory Metrorail station. A significant proportion of Suitland Parkway. Through these facilities, Buzzard Point is event patrons can and will walk these distances, but in order to regionally accessible and has many of the positive benefits of a provide a quality game-day experience, it will be necessary to centralized urban location. implement operational solutions to improve accessibility to the Stadium. Walking routes across South Capitol Street will need In addition to these facilities, the location of the Stadium within to be reviewed to ensure pedestrians can safely and easily an urban setting and the proximity of Nationals’ Park provide make the crossings before and after events. Finally, helping several advantages. Notably, (1) the improvements to the Navy create a pedestrian-friendly walking route, with a quality arrival Yard Metrorail portal that allow for greater flow of riders in and sequence to the Stadium, can help reduce the perceived out of the station on game days and (2) the numerous parking walking time. lots that serve office space and/or events at Nationals’ Park. 2 Figure 1: Major Transportation Facilities 3 Figure 2: Summary of Concerns 4 BUZZARD POINT BACKGROUND the vision on the opposite side of South Capitol Street. In the The area known as Buzzard Point is generally considered to be past 10 years, there has been significant interest in the District bordered by M Street SW to the north, South Capitol Street to regarding major office tenants or mixed-use development the east, the Anacostia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Traffic Technical Report
    United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Headquarters Consolidation Traffic Technical Report December 2016 GSA/CIS Preliminary Draft Review Prepared by: The US General Services Administration With Technical Assistance from: 1 USCIS Lease Consolidation Traffic Technical Report Project Summary 1 PROJECT SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION 3 This Traffic Technical Report has been prepared for the United States General Services Administration (GSA) 4 to assess and report potential transportation impacts resulting from the proposed consolidation of the 5 United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) at a site in southeastern Maryland, located at One 6 Town Center, Camp Springs, Prince George’s County. The proposed consolidation would result in the 7 relocation of approximately 3,200 USCIS employees to a single 575,000 rentable square-foot (RSF) office site, 8 from six other offices: 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, 131 M Street, NE, 9 1200 First Street, NE, and 633 Third Street, NW in Washington, DC and 2121 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. 10 The One Town Center site is located within the Town Center at Camp Springs, a 227.4 acre subdivision 11 originally known as Capital Gateway. This subdivision is located on the northeast side of the Branch Avenue 12 Metro Station in the Morningside area of Prince George’s County, Maryland. There have been several 13 Detailed Site Plan approvals covering different parts of the Capital Gateway subdivision, zoned as M-X-T, that 14 include plans for residential, retail, and office uses. The latest and final approved plan includes the proposed 15 10.96 acre USCIS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment
    Preliminary Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment SOUTHERN AVENUE NAYLOR ROAD SUITLAND BRANCH AVENUE The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission www.pgplanning.org Abstract Title: Preliminary Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment Author: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Subject: Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for Central Annapolis Road Date: May 2013 Source of Copies: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 (301) 952-3195 Series Number: 108132405 Number of Pages: 202 Abstract: II Preliminary Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment Southern Green Line Station Area Plan Preliminary Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment May 2013 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20772 301-952-3972 www.pgplanning.org III Preliminary Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Elizabeth M. Hewlett, Chairman Françoise Carrier, Vice Chairman Officers Patricia Colihan Barney, Executive Director Joseph Zimmerman, Secretary-Treasurer Adrian R. Gardner, General Counsel The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission is a bicounty agency, created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission’s geographic authority extends to the great majority of Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties: the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M-NCPPC planning jurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks) comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Final PMOC Safetrackreport (June2017)
    Monthly Report SafeTrack Program Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) June 2017 Progress Surge 15 – Building forms for new grout pads between Cheverly and Landover Stations October 25, 2017 PMOC Contract Number: DTFT60-14-D-00011 Task Order Number: 006, Project Number: DC-27-5272, Work Order No. 02 OPs Referenced: 01, 25 Hill International, Inc. One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, 17th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 PMOC Lead: Michael E. Radbill, P.E. (215) 309-7926 [email protected] Length of Time PMOC Assigned to Project under current Contract: 3 years, 5 months Length of Time PMOC Lead Assigned to Project: 5 years, 6 months TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 A. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 2 B. PROGRAM STATUS ....................................................................................................... 2 C. CORE ACCOUNTABILITY INFORMATION ....................................................................... 3 D. MAJOR PROBLEMS/ISSUES ........................................................................................... 4 MAIN REPORT ....................................................................................................................... 7 1. PROGRAM STATUS ........................................................................................................... 7 2. PROGRAM COST ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Southern Green Line Station Area
    Abstract Title: Approved Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment Author: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Subject: Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for Southern Green Line Station Area Date: February 2014 Source of Copies: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 (301) 952-3195 Number of Pages: 376 Abstract: The Approved Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment seeks to bring transit-oriented development to the four Metrorail station areas along the Southern Green Line: Branch Avenue, Suitland, Naylor Road, and Southern Avenue in order to maximize the potential for economic and community development, and identifies opportunities for infill and redevelopment, sets a vision for each station area, and makes recommendations for future land use, creation of new Transit-Oriented Development zoning districts, regional and local roadway projects, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities and outlines implementation strategies, including specific recommendations for rezoning through the approved SMA where existing zoning districts can be applied to facilitate plan implementation. II Approved Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment Approved Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment February 2014 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20772 301-952-3972 www.pgplanning.org Approved Southern Green Line Station Area Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment III The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Elizabeth M. Hewlett, Chairman Françoise Carrier, Vice Chairman Officers Patricia Colihan Barney, Executive Director Joseph Zimmerman, Secretary-Treasurer Adrian R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Performance Oversight Questions
    2014-2015 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Performance Oversight Questions Agency Organization 1. Please provide a complete, up-to-date organizational chart for each division within WMATA including, either attached or separately, an explanation of the roles and responsibilities for each division and subdivision. Answer: Please access the following link: http://wmata.com/pdfs/Org_Chart_1-14-15.pdf Human Resources 2. Please provide a complete, up-to-date position listing for WMATA in Excel spreadsheet format, which includes the following information: Title of position Name of employee or statement that the position is vacant, unfunded, or proposed For each vacant position, how long has it been vacant and what is the status to fill the position Date employee began in position Salary and fringe benefits, including the specific grade, series, and step of position Job status (continuing/term/temporary/contract) Answer: See Attachment #2 3. What is the current vacancy rate and turnover rate? Answer: Current Vacancy rate = 6% Turnover Rate = 6.8% 4. What number and percent of your employees are District residents? What number and percent of new hires in FY’14 and FY’15 to date are District residents? Answer: DC Residents = 12.7% Fiscal Year DC Resident Total Hires % DC Residents CY 2014 1815 841 14% CY 2015 YTD 1641 12% 5. How many individuals have been interviewed and/or hired by WMATA as a result of the partnership with the DC Office of Employment Services (DOES) in FY’14, FY’15 to date, and total to date since the program’s inception? Has the nature of the partnership been reviewed or revisited to increase candidates? Answer: FY2013 = 5 FY2014 = 1 Total DOES hires since inception = 7 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlboro Ridge Community Guide Copyright 2012 Toll Brothers, Inc
    A GUIDE TO THE SERVICES AVAILABLE NEAR YOUR NEW HOME Marlboro Ridge COMMUNITY GUIDE Copyright 2012 Toll Brothers, Inc. All rights reserved. These resources are provided for informational purposes only, and represent just a sample of the services available for each community. Toll Brothers in no way endorses or recommends any of the resources presented herein. MRCM-2537-30310 4/12 CONTENTS COMMUNITY PROFILE . 1 SCHOOLS . 2 SHOPPING . 3 MEDICAL FACILITIES . 4 PUBLIC UTILITIES . 4 WORSHIP . 5 TRANSPORTATION . 7 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES . 8 RESTAURANTS . 12 LIBRARIES . 14 COLLEGES . 14 VETERINARIANS . 15 SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS . 15 GOVERNMENT . 16 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS . 16 EMERGENCY . 17 LEARN ABOUT THE SERVICES YOUR COMMUNITY HAS TO OFFER COMMUNITY PROFILE Nestled in a charming country setting, Marlboro Ridge is a sophisticated recreational community offering state-of-the-art equestrian facilities and resort-style amenities, and is just minutes from any convenience you may need . Families who live here will enjoy the relaxed atmosphere of tranquil country living, with excellent shopping and a wide choice of cultural and recreational events close to home . The beautiful Potomac and Patuxent Rivers, only 20 minutes away, and the Chesapeake Bay and Maryland Eastern Shore, 45 minutes away, offer opportunities for boating, fishing, and other water sports . Several local and state parks are located nearby, including Rosaryville State Park, home to the historic Mount Airy Mansion, and Watkins Regional Park . At these parks, you and your family can enjoy touring a nature center, camping, picnicking, hiking, biking, and horseback riding, among other recreational activities . In addition to the many recreational opportunities, Prince George’s County also offers a broad variety of cultural diversions .
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Transit Development Plan
    DC Circulator Transit Development Plan 2020 Update April 12, 2021 (Page intentionally left blank) DC Circulator 2020 TDP i April 2021 Transit Development Plan 2020 Update DRAFT Table of Contents 1.046T 46T Introduction46T ..............................................................46T .................................................... 1 46T 46T Purpose of the Transit Development Plan (TDP)46T ..............................................................46T ............ 1 46T 46T Transit Development Plan Process46T ..............................................................46T ................................. 3 2.046T 46T DC Circulator System Overview46T ..............................................................46T ....................... 4 46T 46T History46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................................. 4 46T 46T Organizational Structure46T 46T ............................................................................................................... 6 46T 46T Strategic Goals and Objectives46T ..............................................................46T ....................................... 6 46T 46T Levels of Service46T 46T ............................................................................................................................ 8 46T 46T Fare Structure46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................... 10 46T 46T Fleet
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Corridor Network Plan
    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Priority Corridor Network Plan PRIORITY CORRIDOR NETWORK PLAN Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority PRIORITY CORRIDOR NETWORK PLAN Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority THE NEED FOR IMPROVED BUS SERVICES The Washington metropolitan area has Figure 1: Transit Modes Used Figure 2: Metrorail, Metrobus, and been growing steadily for the past 30 years Local Service Areas and is expected to continue to grow. Accord- ing to Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) estimates, jobs are expected to increase by 31 percent between 2008 and 2030, and population is expected to grow 26 percent over the same period. How- ever, the region is not growing uniformly. The outer suburbs are expected to grow much faster than the regional core, with dramatic increases in population and employment. The regional core and inner suburbs will still have the highest concentrations of jobs in 2030, but the inner and outer suburbs will have the ma- jority of the population. per year, and is expected to continue to grow Between 2000 and 2008, travel time by Me- as population and employment increase. This trobus has increased due to growing conges- The growth in population and employment growth has led to challenges for the Metrobus and the pattern of growth both are contribut- tion. For example, Route 52 on Fourteenth service. Not only has demand been increas- Street in Washington DC experienced nearly ing to increased vehicle travel. More people ing, but the added traffic congestion stem- are traveling longer distances to reach their a 14 percent increase in travel time, Route ming from regional growth has been increas- 29K on Little River Turnpike/Duke Street in places of employment and other destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • WMATA Station Site and Access Planning Manual
    $% %# ! %#%#$%&% #% $%% $%$$ !& , STATION SITE AND ACCESS PLANNING MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 ACCESS NEEDS 1-2 1.2 DEFINING ACCESS 1-3 1.3 ACCESS HEIRARCHY 1-4 1.3.1 Pedestrians 1-5 1.3.2 Bicycles 1-5 1.3.3 Transit (Buses) 1-6 1.3.4 Kiss & Ride 1-6 1.3.5 Park & Ride 1-6 1.4 REGULATIONS AND CONTROLS 1-6 1.4.1 Reference Documents 1-7 1.5 PROCEDURES 1-7 CHAPTER 2 – STATION SITE FACILITIES DESIGN 2.1 GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 2-1 2.1.1 Walkway Width 2-3 2.2 SEPARATION BETWEEN MODES 2-5 2.2.1 Pedestrians 2-5 2.2.2 Bicycles 2-5 2.2.3 Transit 2-5 2.2.4 Kiss & Ride/Park & Ride 2-5 2.3 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 2-6 2.3.1 Pedestrian Network 2-6 2.3.2 Walkway Surfaces , Stairs, and Egress 2-7 -i- 2.3.3 Intersections, Crosswalks, and Medians 2-7 2.3.4 Grade Separated Crossings and Pedestrian Tunnels 2-8 2.4 BICYCLE FACILITIES 2-8 2.4.1 Bicycle Access 2-8 2.4.2 Bicycle Parking 2-9 2.5 TRANSIT FACILITIES 2-9 2.5.1 General Access Considerations 2-10 2.5.2 Off-Street Bus Bays 2-11 2.5.3 On-Street Bus Bays 2-15 2.2.4 Bus Facilities Understructure 2-15 2.5.5 Connecting Rail 2-16 2.6 KISS & RIDE FACILITIES 2-16 2.6.1 General 2-16 2.6.2 Pick-Up/Drop-Off Zones 2-17 2.6.3 Driver-Attended Parking 2-20 2.6.4 Motorcycle Parking 2-20 2.6.5 Short-Term Parking 2-20 2.6.6 Kiss & Ride Facilities Under Structure 2-20 2.7 PARK & RIDE FACILITIES 2-20 2.7.1 General 2-20 2.7.2 Park & Ride Size 2-21 2.7.3 Park & Ride Layout 2-21 2.7.4 Parking Access and Revenue Control 2-21 2.7.5 Signage 2-23 2.7.6 Parking Structures
    [Show full text]
  • NEW LRT SYSTEMS for 2013 Hong Kong’S Changing Transit Landscape
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Royal opening for Casablanca tramway l DART becomes USA’s biggest LRT system l Edinburgh Trams - full speed tests begin TOURS DE FORCE: NEW LRT SYSTEMS FOR 2013 Hong Kong’s changing transit landscape Salt Lake City Liberec Utah’s key player The dual-gauge in the modern network with renaissance high ambitions of US light rail for the future FEBRUARY 2013 No. 902 WWW . LRTA . ORG l WWW . TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 TAUT_1302_Cover.indd 1 03/01/2013 13:54 AD TRAM URBAN.pdf 2 27/06/12 11:18 C M Y CM With the merger of three of their companies, CAF Group MY has multiplied resources in a single company: CY CAF Power & Automation. CMY CAF Group promoted the merger of three of its companies (Traintic, Trainelec and DTQ4) K to form a single company: CAF Power & Automation. A new company dedicated to the design and production of onboard power units as well as control and communication systems for any type of rolling stock. CAF Power & Automation is an evolution in the solution suppliers market for the international rail sector, providing its own technology and human team, which is both adaptable and highly qualified. 60th UITP World Congress and Mobility & City Transport Exhibition # 21 Congress sessions and 10 Regional workshops # 15 Expo forums to share product development information # Platform for innovations, networking, business opportunities # Multi-modal Exhibition, 30,000m² # Over 150 speakers from 30+ countries # A special Swiss Day! www.uitpgeneva2013.org Organiser Local host Supporters Under the patronage of 42_TAUT1302_layoutpage.indd 1 19/12/2012 10:45 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 44 News 44 FEBRUARY 2013 Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • 65 Table 23: Intersection Summary – Channing Street NW & First Street NW
    Table 23: Intersection Summary – Channing Street NW & First Street NW ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 13-14 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia 65 CASE NO.13-14 EXHIBITDeleted NO.32D3 Table 24: Intersection Summary – Channing Street NE/NW & North Capitol Street (1 of 2) 66 Table 25: Intersection Summary – Channing Street NE/NW & North Capitol Street (2 of 2) 67 Table 26: Intersection Summary – Bryant Street NW & First Street NW 68 Table 27: Intersection Summary – Columbia Road NW & Georgia Avenue NW (1 of 2) 69 Table 28: Intersection Summary – Columbia Road NW & Georgia Avenue NW (2 of 2) 70 Table 29: Intersection Summary – Harvard Street NW & Georgia Avenue NW (1 of 2) 71 Table 30: Intersection Summary – Harvard Street NW & Georgia Avenue NW (2 of 2) 72 Table 31: Intersection Summary – W Street NW & Georgia Avenue NW (1 of 2) 73 Table 32: Intersection Summary – W Street NW & Georgia Avenue NW (2 of 2) 74 Table 33: Intersection Summary – North Service Court NW & North Capitol Street (1 of 2) 75 Table 34: Intersection Summary – North Service Court NW & North Capitol Street (2 of 2) 76 Table 35: Intersection Summary – Evarts Street NW & North Capitol Street (1 of 2) 77 Table 36: Intersection Summary – Evarts Street NW & North Capitol Street (2 of 2) 78 Table 37: Intersection Summary – Evarts Street NW & First Street NW (1 of 2) 79 Table 38: Intersection Summary – Evarts Street NW & First Street NW (2 of 2) 80 Table 39: Intersection Summary – North Service Court NW & First Street NW (1 of 2) 81 Table 40: Intersection Summary – North Service Court NW & First Street NW (2 of 2) 82 Table 41: Intersection Summary – Medical Office Driveway #1 & First Street NW (1 of 2) 83 Table 42: Intersection Summary – Medical Office Driveway #1 & First Street NW (2 of 2) 84 SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining the Metropolis LRT and Streetcars for Super Cities
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C177 November 2013 Sustaining the Metropolis LRT and Streetcars for Super Cities 12th International Light Rail Conference November 11–13, 2012 Salt Lake City, Utah TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2013 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk, Virginia Vice Chair: Kirk T. Steudle, Director, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing Division Chair for NRC Oversight: Susan Hanson, Distinguished University Professor Emerita, School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2013–2014 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Katherine F. Turnbull, Executive Associate Director, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Paul Carlson, Research Engineer, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Operations and Maintenance Group Chair Barbara A. Ivanov, Director, Freight Systems, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Freight Systems Group Chair Paul P. Jovanis, Professor, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Safety and Systems Users Group Chair Thomas J. Kazmierowski, Senior Consultant, Golder Associates, Toronto, Canada, Design and Construction Group Chair Mark S. Kross, Consultant, Jefferson City, Missouri, Planning and Environment Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, LeighFisher, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Harold R. (Skip) Paul, Director, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, State DOT Representative Anthony D. Perl, Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies and Director, Urban Studies Program, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Rail Group Chair Lucy Phillips Priddy, Research Civil Engineer, U.S.
    [Show full text]