DOCSLIB.ORG

Standard VHB Memo Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standard VHB Memo Template January 29, 2010 Contract No. 09-049 An Evaluation of the Metrobus Priority Corridor Networks Draft Final Report Submitted to Metropolitan Washington Council of 777 North Capitol Street, N.E Governments Suite 300 Washington, District of Columbia 20002 Washington Metropolitan Area 600 5th Street, NW Transit Authority Washington, DC 20001 Submitted by In Association With: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Shapiro Transportation Consulting, LLC 8300 Boone Boulevard, Suite 700 Foursquare Integrated Transportation Planning Vienna, VA 22182 Gallop Corporation Contents Overview of Priority Corridor Network (PCN) Concept ...................................................... 1 PCN Concept ............................................................................................................................ 1 Current PCN Status ................................................................................................................. 1 PCN Evaluation Project .......................................................................................................... 4 PCN Evaluation Overall Findings ......................................................................................... 5 Overall Results of PCN Alternatives .................................................................................... 5 Results of Key Measures of Effectiveness in PCN Corridors ............................................ 7 PCN Impact on Regional Transit Ridership ...................................................................... 14 PCN Relationship with Larger Regional Priority Bus Network ..................................... 15 Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 17 A : Detailed PCN Analysis Methodology and Results .................................................... 18 PCN Evaluation Project Introduction ................................................................................. 18 Assumptions ........................................................................................................................... 18 Corridors Analyzed and Modeled ...................................................................................... 20 Impact of Existing and Modeled Projects on PCN Evaluation ....................................... 37 Alternatives Development ................................................................................................... 38 Corridor Segmentation and Cut-Lines ............................................................................... 39 Exclusive Lane Full-Build Scenario Tool ............................................................................ 39 Defined Alternatives ............................................................................................................. 43 CORRIDOR ................................................................................................................................ 47 Goals, Objectives and Measures of Effectiveness .............................................................. 48 Results of Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 50 Overall Review of Objectives for PCN System .................................................................. 51 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 61 References ............................................................................................................................... 62 B : PCN Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology ........................................................ 63 C : Travel Time Savings attributable to PCN Attributes ................................................. 79 Existing Research Basis ......................................................................................................... 79 PCN Final Draft Report Effect of Exclusive Use of Roadway Space ........................................................................ 82 Use of Transit Signal Preemption to Reduce Bus Delays at Traffic Signals .................. 83 Use of Off-Board Fare Collection to Reduce Boarding Times ......................................... 84 Spacing of Bus Stops or Stations .......................................................................................... 85 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 86 D : PCN Accounting for Non-travel Time Related Factors ............................................. 89 E : Research from Existing Studies for PCN Corridors ................................................... 93 Metrobus 16th Street Line Study .......................................................................................... 93 Metrobus 30s Line Study ...................................................................................................... 96 MetroExtra Service Plan and District of Columbia Rapid Bus Study .......................... 100 Bethesda-College Park Corridor Study ............................................................................ 103 Leesburg Pike Updated Technical Memorandum Review ............................................ 108 F : PCN Corridor Segmentation ....................................................................................... 113 Background and Purpose of Segmentation ..................................................................... 113 Segmentation Methodology ............................................................................................... 113 Segmentation Results .......................................................................................................... 115 Segment Characteristics ...................................................................................................... 116 Segment Maps ...................................................................................................................... 157 G : Exclusive Lane Improvements Alternative Level of Investment Methodology .. 181 Levels of Investment Recommended ................................................................................ 182 PCN Final Draft Report Figures Figure A-1: 2008 CLRP Transit and HOV Improvements .................................................. 19 Figure A-2: Process for Developing Alternatives ................................................................. 38 Figure A-3 Daily Transit Ridership for Full-Build Exclusive Lane Scenario Tool .......... 42 Figure A-4 Transit Riders by Mode for Full-Build Exclusive Lane Scenario .................... 43 Figure A-5 PCN Treatments for Exclusive Lanes Investment Alternative ...................... 45 Figure A-6 Exclusive Lanes and Spot Improvements for Exclusive Lane Improvements Alternative .................................................................................................................................. 46 Figure A-7 Mode Split for Daily Transit Riders for Alternatives ...................................... 54 Figure A-8 Percent of PCN Transit to Auto Trip Time ........................................................ 57 Figure A-9 PCN Corridor Auto Travel Time Changes for Alternatives (AM Peak) ...... 59 Figure B-1: Analysis Approach ............................................................................................... 64 Figure B-2 Estimating Existing Ridership .............................................................................. 66 Figure B-3 Cutline Map ............................................................................................................ 67 Figure B-4 Validation Process .................................................................................................. 69 Figure B-5 Process to Estimate 2030 Baseline Ridership ...................................................... 74 Figure B-6 Process to Forecast 2030 Ridership with PCN Treatments .............................. 76 Figure C-1: Components of bus running time (New York MTA) ...................................... 81 Figure C-2: Components of Bus Travel Time, Fairfax County VA.................................... 81 Figure C-3: Percent Reduction in Travel Time vs. Stop Spacing ........................................ 86 Figure F-1: Map of PCN Corridor #1-- Columbia Pike (Mainline) .................................. 157 Figure F-2: Map of PCN Corridor #1-- Columbia Pike (section to downtown Washington) ............................................................................................................................. 158 Figure F-3: Map of PCN Corridor #2 – Richmond Highway Express ............................. 159 Figure F-4: Map of PCN Corridor #3 – Georgia Avenue / 7th Street (D.C.) ................... 160 Figure F-5: Map of PCN Corridor #4 – Crystal City / Potomac Yard ............................. 161 Figure F-6: Map of PCN Corridor #6 – Wisconsin Avenue / Pennsylvania Avenue ... 162 Figure F-7: Map of PCN Corridor #7 – University Boulevard / East-West Highway .. 163 Figure F-8: Map of PCN Corridor #8 – Sixteenth Street (D.C.) ......................................... 164 Figure F-9: Map of PCN Corridor #9 – Leesburg Pike ....................................................... 165 PCN Final Draft Report Figure F-10: Map of PCN Corridor #10 – Veirs Mill Road ................................................ 166 Figure F-11:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Naylor Road Metro Station Area Accessibility Study
    Naylor Road Metro Station Area Accessibility Study Pedestrian and Bicycle Metro Station Access Transportation Land-Use Connection (TLC) National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission May 2011 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Study Process ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Planning Context and Past Studies ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Conditions and Challenges ............................................................................................................. 10 Public Outreach .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bowie Washington Clinton Oxon Hill Camp Springs
    503 Z7 to/from Laurel to/from Columbia 409 Z2 to/from Olney C8 to/from White Flint to/from Elkridge Z11 to/from Laurel Racetrack Burtonsville Park & Ride Montgomery 295 St 302 Main St Z6 Sandy Spring Rd 89M WESTFARM to/from Burtonsville/ RTA provides local service Castle Blvd Z7 Old Sandy 87 Z2 Z7 to/from throughout Central Maryland, Spring Rd Z8 Z6 Paul S. Sarbanes Transit Center to/from Greencastle/Briggs Chaney (Silver Spring m ) Sweitzer Ln including Laurel. 503 COLUMBIA PIKE 302 Gorman Ave 5th St WHITE OAK 409 K6 Industrial Intercounty Connector Van Dusen Rd 87 Pkwy CALVERTON 141 89 89M 89 Laurel Tech Broadbirch Dr 141 to/from Rd Galway Dr Gaithersburg Park & Ride Calverton Blvd Laurel 301 Washington Blvd Van Dusen Rd Fort Meade Rd B30 Z6 Z7 Regional Z7 302 LAUREL Baltimore-Washingtonto/from Pkwy BWI Airport via Arundel Mills Z7 502 Hospital Ashford 4th St LOCKWOOD DR Blvd 502 to/from Arundel Mills Z11 K9 R2 Beltsville Dr 87 C8 FDA Cherry Ln Z2 C8 Red Clay Rd PATUXENT RIVER Plum Orchard Dr Towne Centre 502 Old Z8 Mulberry St Laurel 87 Annapolis Rd Broadbirch Dr Broadbirch R2 Z6 95 301 White Oak Cherry Hill Rd 89 Cherry Ln Adventist St Cypress 302 502 89M Laurel-Bowie Federal Medical Center 87 Z7 Rd Research South Laurel NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE AmmendaleVirginia Rd B30 Muirkirk Park & Ride Center 86 Manor Ritz Way Baltimore Ave COLUMBIA PIKE Rd Rd Z7 Centerpark Powder Mill Rd Laurel-Bowie Rd89M 87 Office Park Contee Rd 301 89 Z2, Z6, Z7, Z8, Z11 to/from Powder Mill Rd Muirkirk Rd 89M Muirkirk Paul S.
    [Show full text]
  • 900 16 Street Project Is Located at the Level of Service to a Component of the Th Intersection of I (Eye) and 16 Streets in Surrounding Transportation Network
    TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY 900 16TH STREET PUD WASHINGTON, DC May 1, 2013 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 13-04 21C ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.13-04 EXHIBIT NO.21C Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 7001 Heritage Village Plaza Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 220 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Gainesville, VA 20155 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 13-04 21C Contents Figures Executive Summary ................................................................... i Figure 1: Site Location ............................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................. 1 Figure 2: Roadway Functional Classification............................ 4 Project Summary ................................................................. 1 Figure 3: AADT Map ................................................................. 4 Figure 4: Existing Transit Facilities ........................................... 7 Purpose of Study ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Business Tracking
    2011 Major Transit Initiatives City of Alexandria / DASH Name of Transit System: City of Alexandria / DASH Initiative Description of Initiative New Service, Service Enhancement, Incentives Description or examples of new or improved transit service implemented, new technology (i.e. WiFi), free bus pass, etc. New DASH AT2X Service from King Street Station to the Mark Center On August 8, 2011, DASH began providing 10 minute headway express service from King Street Station to the BRAC-133 complex at the Maark Center. New WMATA 7M Service from the Pentagon to the Mark Center. On August 8, 2011, WMATA began providing 10 minute headway express service from Pentagon to the BRAC-133 complex at the Maark Center. The City worked with the DOD to implement a new transit center at the Mark Center Business/Resident/Commuter Marketing Initiatives Description or examples of advertising, promotion, direct mail, facebook/twitter, events, etc. Advocacy Description of activity or member ship to APTA, local Chamber of Commerce, etc Major Transit Initiatives Name of Transit System: Arlington Transit (ART) Initiative Description of Initiative New Service, Service Enhancement, Incentives Description or examples of new or improved transit service implemented, new technology (i.e. WiFi), free bus pass, etc. Taking data from the dispatch/AVL/CAD system and 1) presenting it in a map module that allows selection of stop by route or location with a pop up showing next RealTime bus arrival system arrival times, 2) presenting it through an Internet url also allowing search by stop number or routes. Worked with CAD contractor to develop GTFS presentation system and making it available to the public through a commuterpage.com interface with RSS feed for GTFS interface updates.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Line Functional Plan? 6 Table 9 Stewart Avenue to CSX/WMATA Right-Of-Way 23
    Approved and Adopted September 2010 purple line F u n c t i o n a l P l a n Montgomery County Planning Department The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission P u r p l e L i n e F u n c t i o n a l P l a n I A p p r o v e d a n d A d o p t e d 1 p u r p l e l i n e f u n c t i o n a l p l a n Approved and Adopted a b s t r a c t The Commission is charged with preparing, adopting, and amending or extending The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical This plan for the Purple Line transit facility through Montgomery County Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Montgomery contains route, mode, and station recommendations. It is a comprehensive and Prince George’s Counties. amendment to the approved and adopted 1990 Georgetown Branch Master Plan Amendment. It also amends The General Plan (On Wedges and The Commission operates in each county through Planning Boards Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington appointed by the county government. The Boards are responsible for all Regional District in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, as local plans, zoning amendments, subdivision regulations, and amended, the Master Plan of Highways for Montgomery County, the administration of parks. Countywide Bikeways Functional Master Plan, the Bethesda-Chevy Chase Master Plan, the Bethesda Central Business District Sector Plan, the Silver The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission encourages Spring Central Business District and Vicinity Sector Plan, the North and West the involvement and participation of individuals with disabilities, and its Silver Spring Master Plan, the East Silver Spring Master Plan, and the facilities are accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 2: Ballston Station Area Sites EXHIBIT NO.57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia
    ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia ZONING COMMISSION Case No. 06-27 District of Columbia CASE NO.06-27 57A2 Figure 2: Ballston Station Area Sites EXHIBIT NO.57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 3: Courthouse Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 4: Crystal City Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 5: Dunn-Loring-Merrifield Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 6: Eisenhower Avenue and King Street Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 7: Farragut West Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 8: Friendship Heights Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 9: Gallery Place-Chinatown Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 57A2 Figure 10: Grosvenor-Strathmore Station Area Sites ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 11: New Carrollton Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 12: Silver Spring Station Area Sites 57A2 MJ Station Entrance/Exit • Office c::J Residential ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 13: U Street/African American Civil War Memoriai/Cardozo Station Area Sites 57A2 3. Data Collection At each site, data about the travel characteristics of individuals who work, live, shop or use the sites were collected through a series of questionnaires conducted through self-administered survey forms and oral intercept interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded and Analyzed the Vehicle Monitoring Data for This Event
    WMSC Commissioner Brief: W-0034 – Fatality at Farragut West Station December 9, February201 2019 Prepared for Washington Metrorail Safety Commission meeting on August 4, 2020 Safety event summary: A customer jumped from the Farragut West platform to the track bed as outbound Blue Line Train 406 entered the station on Track 2 on December 9, 2019 at approximately 12:53 p.m. Upon report of the collision, Metro Transit Police and D.C. Fire EMS were called and third rail power was de- energized on Track 2 at 12:55 p.m. Power was de-energized to Track 1 at 1:07 p.m. Service resumed after 3 p.m. Probable Cause: The customer intentionally placed themselves in front of oncoming train. Corrective Actions: None planned in specific response to this event. Train 3166 broken TWC antenna repaired. Staff recommendation: Adopt final report. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Department of Safety & Environmental Management FINAL REPORT OF INVESTIGATION A&I E19675 SMS 20191209#84904 Date of Event: 12/09/2019 Type of Event: Collision (Fatality) Incident Time: 12:54 hrs. Location: Farragut West Station, Track 2 Time and How received by SAFE: 12/09/2019 - 12:55 hrs. - SAFE on-call phone WMSC Notification: 12/09/2019 - 13:09 hrs. WMSC on-call phone Responding Safety officers: WMATA SAFE: Yes, SAFE 203 WMSC: No Other: N/A Rail Vehicle: (L) 3166.3167 x 3114.3115 x 3156.3157 Injuries: Fatal Injury Damage: Car 3166 Broken TWC Antenna Emergency Responders: Metro Transit Police Department (MTPD), Office of Car Maintenance (CMNT), Office of Rail Transportation (RTRA), DC Fire and EMS (DCFD), Safety and Environmental Management (SAFE), Track and Structure (TRST).
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget
    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Serving the National Capital Region Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Serving the National Capital Region Table of Contents Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Serving the National Capital Region Table of Contents Table of Contents General Manager’s Letter......................................................................................3 Chapter 1. Introduction to Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority...............................................................................5 Metro Profile ...............................................................................................5 Metro’s Strategic Plan ................................................................................6 Metro Board of Directors and Agency Oversight ........................................7 Organization Chart .....................................................................................9 How to Contact Metro...............................................................................10 Chapter 2. Budget Summary..............................................................................13 Operating Budget .....................................................................................16 Capital Budget..........................................................................................17 Reimbursable Projects .............................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Metrobus of 9 De Julio Avenue, PMI Argentina
    PM World Journal Project Management Update from Argentina Vol.VI, Issue VI – June 2017 Cecilia Boggi www.pmworldjournal.net Regional Report Project Management update from Argentina By Cecilia Boggi, PMP International Correspondent Buenos Aires, Argentina A successful Argentine Project in public transportation has recently received an international award. It’s the Project of the "Metrobus of 9 de Julio Avenue" in the city of Buenos Aires, which was chosen as the "Greatest Achievement of World Transportation" by the International Transport Forum, as it constitutes "a good example of an effective framework of cooperation between diverse actors" of the sector. The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organization integrated with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which carries out its activities autonomously and the Argentine project was chosen from 57 projects from China, Germany, France, United Kingdom, India, Japan, Spain, Switzerland, United States, Korea, Canada, Mexico, Russia, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Denmark and Finland, among others. The Metrobus is a transportation system that combines traditional and articulated buses with exclusive lanes that reduce travel times and improves environmental quality. In the city of Buenos Aires, the first Metrobus was inaugurated in 2011 on Juan B. Justo Avenue, between Liniers and Palermo districts, and in 2013 the same system was implemented on 9 de Julio Avenue. When this project began, it generated many controversies because its construction modified the view of the mythical 9 de Julio Avenue, the widest in the world according to the “Porteños”- inhabitants of the city of Buenos Aires-, in the middle of which is the Obelisco, the largest emblem of the city of Buenos Aires.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudio Comparativo De Sistemas De Capacidad Intermedia: Metros Ligeros Y Autobuses Rápidos (Brt): Aproximación Al Problema Desde El Estudio De Casos
    ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO DE SISTEMAS DE CAPACIDAD INTERMEDIA: METROS LIGEROS Y AUTOBUSES RÁPIDOS (BRT): APROXIMACIÓN AL PROBLEMA DESDE EL ESTUDIO DE CASOS. 1. INTRODUCCIÓN El transporte público urbano de capacidad intermedia (metro ligero o autobuses de plataforma reservada) se caracteriza por usar la propia vía pública de las ciudades como soporte para realizar su objetivo, a diferencia del metro o de los sistemas elevados, que en buena parte son independientes de las vías urbanas. El comportamiento, la aceptación y el éxito de estos sistemas de transporte, dependen de las características en el ámbito económico, social, político y urbano de la ciudad en la que se encuentran implementados. El objetivo de este trabajo es caracterizar y comparar las experiencias de sistemas de transporte de capacidad intermedia que se han explotado en Europa (caso metro ligero) y en algunos países de América Latina (caso autobuses con plataforma reservada) y poder llegar a conclusiones que permitan obtener una visión más amplia de cual podría ser la mejor opción entre estos dos sistemas, analizando las ventajas e inconvenientes, fortalezas y debilidades, de cada uno de ellos. 2. SISTEMAS DE TRANSPORTE COLECTIVO Es preciso considerar que hay tres categorías básicas que reflejan el grado de independencia de la infraestructura de un sistema de transporte colectivo (MPTM, 1995): Categoría A, o infraestructura completamente controlada, que tiene la plataforma para el transporte colectivo completamente independiente, sin cruces a nivel de vehículos y personas. Categoría B, o infraestructuras parcialmente controlada, que comprenden los casos en la cuales el transporte colectivo esta separado físicamente del resto del trafico (por bordillos, barreras especiales o vallas, entre otros) pero con cruce a nivel con vehículos y peatones, incluyendo intersecciones.
    [Show full text]
  • Farragut North and Farragut West Pedestrian Passageway Tunnel Study
    FARRAGUT NORTH AND FARRAGUT WEST PEDESTRIAN PASSAGEWAY TUNNEL STUDY Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND STRATEGIC PROGRAMS OFFICE OF BUSINESS PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (BPPD) August 23, 2004 Prepared By: Parsons KGP Design Studio Basile Baumann Prost & Associates Farragut North and Farragut West Pedestrian Passageway Tunnel TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION and DESCRIPTION of PROJECT 5 II. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION OPTIONS 6 A. Connections at Farragut West 6 B. Connections at Farragut North 7 C. Pedestrian Tunnel Options 7 1. Option 1 – Pedestrian Tunnel 8 2. Option 2 – Pedestrian Tunnel with Moving Walkway 8 3. Option 3 – Pedestrian Tunnel with Commercial Space 8 III. CODES and DATA 9 IV. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS and DECISION PROCESS 9 A. Initial Scope and Alternatives 9 1. Alternative 1: Pedestrian Tunnel to Existing Mezzanines in North and West 10 2. Alternative 2: Pedestrian Tunnel to South End of Farragut North and Existing Mezzanine at Farragut West 10 B. Entrances To the Tunnel 11 C. Farragut North – South Entrance to Platform Options, Alternative 2 and All Options 11 D. Farragut West – Station Entrance and Platform Elevators, All Alternatives and Options 12 E. Decision Process 12 V. STRUCTURAL FEATURES 13 A. Modification of Farragut North Station 13 B. Modification of Farragut West Station 15 C. Relocation of Vent Shaft at 17th Street 15 D. Tunnel Construction Method 16 E. Emergency Egress of Passageway 16 VI. MECHANICAL FEATURES A. General Mechanical Issues Common to All Options 17 1. Passageway Air Conditioning 17 2. Vent Shaft Relocation 18 3. Station Mechanical Room Modifications 18 4. Fire Protection 19 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Other Transportation Documents This report is a TMP (Transportation Management Plan) for the This TMP is just one of several transportation new DC United Stadium in the Buzzard Point neighborhood of efforts/reports that will be performed for the new DC Washington, D.C. This TMP was prepared in coordination with a United Stadium. Other efforts will include a partnership between the District of Columbia government, Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) presented via an including the DC Department of Transportation (DDOT), and Environmental Mitigation Study (EMS) and a the ownership of the DC United professional soccer club. Transportation Operations Plan (TOP). This TMP document is a planning-level report that summarizes The TIA will contain a detailed technical review of the travel characteristics of Stadium patrons, reviews intersection capacity, as well as impacts to other modes of travel on game-days. It is intended to identify comparable stadiums, and outlines recommendations for each the amount of additional transportation activity mode of transportation for accommodating game-day expected during game-days and will recommend transportation needs. It is intended to be the guiding document mitigation measures to alleviate concerns. This will be that outlines transportation strategies that other included in the EMS for the new Stadium. This TMP transportation efforts and actions follow. As such, it will be document will be coordinated with the TIA by providing updated several times prior to the expected inaugural season in information on patron travel characteristics and strategies to manage demand. 2017. The TOP, prepared closer to the stadium’s opening, This report is written assuming that the new DC United Stadium acts as an operations “how to” manual.
    [Show full text]