Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation

Home , Curb

for a higher quality life of

creating solutionsremarkable

Wards 1-10

City of St. Charles, MISSOURI 16STR21

GBA PROJECT NO. 13459.00

FINAL REPORT MARCH,2017 Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 1 City of St. Charles, Missouri

1 Table of Contents

2 Executive Summary ...... 2 3 Introduction ...... 2 3.1 General Overview ...... 2 3.2 Purpose ...... 3 3.3 Procedure ...... 3 3.4 Benefits of Project ...... 3 4 Data Collection ...... 3 5 Explanation of the Rating System...... 5 6 Group Weighting Factor ...... 10 7 Data Collection Field Investigations ...... 10 8 Results and Discussion ...... 12 8.1 Ward 1 Results and Discussion ...... 12 8.2 Ward 2 Results and Discussion ...... 12 8.3 Ward 3 Results and Discussion ...... 12 8.4 Ward 4 Results and Discussion ...... 13 8.5 Ward 5 Results and Discussion ...... 13 8.6 Ward 6 Results and Discussion ...... 13 8.7 Ward 7 Results and Discussion ...... 13 8.8 Ward 8 Results and Discussion ...... 13 8.9 Ward 9 Results and Discussion ...... 13 8.10 Ward 10 Results and Discussion ...... 13 9 Conclusion ...... 24 10 Appendices ...... 25

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 2 City of St. Charles, Missouri

2 Executive Summary The City of St. Charles required a comprehensive tool to determine the difficulty of curb construction throughout streets that do not have curb. To do this, a set of criteria was developed to examine each segment of roadway throughout the City without curbs and develop a score and ranking system for each segment. Criterion with similar characteristics were grouped into major grading categories, as follows:  Parking  Constructability  Planning  Drainage  Engineering  Cost To emphasize the importance of a criteria group, a weighting factor was developed to apply to each group’s scoring. The summation of the group scores yields the overall rank or ease adding curb to a section of no-curb road. To quantify the scores, a database was created to record each street segment score as well as the applied weighting factor. The database was then liked to the City’s GIS system for easy review of the constructability of the curb and gutter on streets throughout the City.

3 Introduction

3.1 General Overview The City of St. Charles has requested the professional experience of George Butler Associates (GBA) for the examination of both residential and commercial streets throughout the city without curb and gutter. The GBA team began with the analysis and prioritization of no-curb segments in Ward 1, which would be used as a pilot project before implementing a refined approach for the remaining Wards. A combination of data was collected from on-site investigation as well as information obtained from City GIS, and was used to develop a scoring system that would prioritize the installation of curb and gutter based on difficulty of implementation. Following review with City staff regarding the data collection methods and prioritization process used for the pilot area, a refined process was agreed upon for the evaluation of the remaining City Wards. Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 3 City of St. Charles, Missouri

3.2 Purpose The addition of curb and gutter provides both an aesthetic and functional purpose. Curbs add a distinct demarcation of a roadway that is innate to driver expectancy, also adding a clear edge of property, while allowing for precise parking control and an increase in drainage efficiency. Additionally, the curb scores will assist in coordinating future construction of sidewalks and roadside safety improvements. The City of St. Charles plans to add curb and gutter where needed based upon the difficulty defined by the GBA team and City Staff.

3.3 Procedure The city is divided up into wards ranging from 1 to 10. For efficient data collection, the wards will be analyzed separately. Criteria for the installation difficulty of curb and gutter on any given street were created by the GBA team and reviewed by the City staff for concurrence. Upon field inspection of street sections without curb and gutter, data pertaining to criteria was collected from current City GIS information as well as on-site inspection. In response to the cities concern for various aspects of curb and gutter installation including parking, constructability, planning, drainage, engineering, and cost, the collected data was divided into the before mentioned groups. A score will be attached to each group and will be weighted according to the City’s needs.

3.4 Benefits of Project The information acquired from this analysis will allow the city to strategically and efficiently plan the construction of curb and gutter throughout the city.

4 Data Collection Arc GIS files were presented to the GBA team to be used for the mapping and consolidation of the curb and gutter data. The files were analyzed and all street sections within wards 1-10 without curb and gutter were assigned an object ID, a number that links the curb with the adjacent street or alley. The object ID allows for the cohesion between data provided by the City of St. Charles and data collected by the GBA team. The GBA team utilized preliminary field visits to determine the criteria necessary to formulate a difficulty rating for the installation of curb and gutter. A data Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 4 City of St. Charles, Missouri collection sheet was created to score each location and is included in the appendix. In accordance with the City of St. Charles’ requests, and GBA field investigations. The following groups of criteria were evaluated in order to accurately rate a ‘No- Curb’ street section:

 Parking o What is the width of the adjacent street? o Is there a No Parking Zone? o Is there need for extra parking? o Is there need for parking control? o Is there a lack of parking regulation?  Constructability o Is there an existing retaining wall? o Is a retaining wall required? o What is the condition of the existing pavement? o Is there an existing sidewalk? o If so, what is the condition of the existing sidewalk? o If curb and gutter is installed, will ADA improvements need to be installed? o What is the setback distance?  Planning o Does the installation of curb and gutter in this area fall in line with other Master Plan projects the city has planned? o What is the zoning classification of the area? o Is the adjacent owner public or private?  Drainage o Are there existing drainage structures? o Is the area in question a sump area? o Will the installation of curb and gutter cause excessive drainage at intersections? o Will the new curb section be too flat and ponding areas?  Engineering o What is the functional classification of the street/section in question? o What is the water quality potential of the area in question? Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 5 City of St. Charles, Missouri

 Cost o What is the number of utility impacts if curb and gutter were to be installed? o What is the number of miscellaneous impacts if curb and gutter were to be installed? o How much right of way is needed to proceed with construction? o What is the length of the section in question? Each criterion provides a score for their respective group as explained below. Each scoring group (i.e. parking, planning, etc.) will have an average upon which a weighting factor will be applied. A summation of the weighted scores produces an overall difficulty rating score.

5 Explanation of the Rating System The assigned scoring ranges from 0 to 10 allowing for score variability within the large amount of collected data. Criteria with a possibility of two answers were assigned either a 0 or a 10. Criteria with a possibility of three answers were assigned a 0, 5, or 10. The number of scoring criteria varies amongst the differing categories. To present an even playing field, a category average score was calculated before the final score. The average score is the total score for the category divided by the number of criteria in the category. A weighted scoring factor was discussed with and decided upon by the City of St. Charles, to be enacted upon the average category score. An excel spreadsheet was utilized to average the scores in each category, apply the desired category weighting factor, and sum each category score to produce a final score. The higher the score, the easier curb is to construct and the higher the overall benefit of constructing curb in the desired section. All assigned scores and scoring criteria are based on the opinion of the engineer. The importance and definition of the scoring criteria are described as follows: Street Width – the distance between the existing pavement edges. The installation of curb and gutter will make the street narrower. Streets wider than 20 feet will be labeled as sufficiently wide and will receive a score of 10. Street widths in between 15 and 20 feet will be labeled as moderately wide and will receive a score of 5. Street widths less than 15 feet will be labeled as narrow and will receive a score of 0. Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 6 City of St. Charles, Missouri

‘No Parking’ Zone – The presence of a ‘No Parking’ Zone sign on the side of the section under examination. No parking signs indicate a regulatory enforcement to keep the street open and unobstructed. No-curb conditions make enforcement more difficult. Signed areas will receive a score of 10 and unsigned areas will receive a score of 0. Need for Extra Parking – based upon the opinion of the engineer. The addition of curb and gutter can better partition a roadside to allow for increased parking if next to a commercial area. If extra parking is beneficial then the data input is yes and will receive a score of 10. If extra parking not needed the data input in no and will be scored 0.

Need for Parking Control – based upon the opinion of the engineer. The addition of curb and gutter can better partition a roadside eliminating access to area where parking is not wanted. If parking control is needed the data input is yes and a scored a 10. If parking control is not required, the score is 0. Existing MSE Wall – a masonry wall or wall of any material that is functioning as an earth stabilizer within the construction limits of the curb and gutter installation. The existing wall will complicate the construction of curb and gutter. If the no- curb segment has an existing MSE wall located in the construction limit the resulting score will be 0. If there is not a MSE Wall the score will be 10. Required MSE Wall – based upon the opinion of the engineer. The addition of curb and gutter may cut into a slope where a wall is deemed necessary to stabilize exposed earth. If an MSE wall is required, the score will be 0. If a MSE wall is not required, the score will be 10. Existing Pavement Condition – based upon the opinion of the engineer. Pavement in better condition will be easier to saw cut, remove and replace than deteriorated pavement. Accordingly, pavement in great condition will score a 10 while pavement in moderate condition will score a 5. Pavement in poor condition will score of 10.

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 7 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Existing Sidewalk – the existence of a paved path for pedestrians at the side of the road. If sidewalk is present, curb construction will be beneficial by adding a safety factor for pedestrians, and rate as a 10. If no sidewalk is present, the score will be 0. Sidewalk Condition – based upon the opinion of the engineer. The rating system is like the pavement condition rating, except that sidewalk will likely be replaced with curb construction regardless of its condition. Therefore, a sidewalk in poor condition will benefit by replacement and score higher than a sidewalk in good condition. The range is 10 for poor sidewalk and 0 for good sidewalk. Required ADA Improvements – Curb and gutter will in some cases terminate into existing sidewalks at street corners. Curbs are seen as an obstacle for pedestrians and the installation in such areas of concern must pass ADA approval. ADA improvements will make curb and gutter more difficult. If ADA. improvements will be required, the score will be 0, otherwise the score will be 10 Setback distance – the distance between the edge of pavement and the edge of the adjacent property. A larger setback allows for an ease in construction due to the increase in accessibility. A setback distance of less than 10ft will score a 0. A distance greater than 20 will score a 10 Zoning Classification – Higher zoning classifications typically allow improvements to be constructed closer to the property line. This increases the likelihood of encountering obstructions at proposed curb locations compared to lower zoned properties. Commercial properties also see less benefit from curb than residential properties that are closer to the roadway. These constraints will make curb construction more difficult, perceived value by commercial property owners lower, and right of way difficult to acquire. Higher zoning class such as commercial or industrial will have a lower score (0) than residential classes (10). Master Plan – The city of St. Charles has released master plans containing future construction jobs for the city. The addition of curb and gutter into areas Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 8 City of St. Charles, Missouri fitting the master plans will increase the efficiency of the money spent on said projects. Sections without curb that fall under more than 2 master plan projects will receive a score of 10. Sections that fall under 1 or 2 master plan projects will receive a score of 5. Sections that do not fall under a master plan project will receive a score of 0. Owner of Adjacent Property- If the owner of the adjacent property is a public stake holder, obtaining easements will be easier. Accordingly, if the owner is private, individual easements will be more difficult. Public owners will score a 10, and private owners will score a 0. Existing Drainage Structures – Curb and gutter will require dewatering to avoid flooding of the road. If drainage structures are present, the existing piping will make it easier to construct the curb. The greater the number of structures the higher the score. If there are no existing drainage structures the score will be 0. Sump Area – low spot along the street that collects water in a rain event. The addition of curb and gutter will increase flow rates on the street. An inlet or other type of drainage structure should be installed to handle increase in flow into the sump area to avoid flooding or damage to the surrounding area. An area labeled as a sump area will receive a score of 0. Sections without sump areas will receive a score of 10. Excessive Drainage – the installation of curb and gutter will increase the discharge rate of rainwater. Longer streets will require the installation of an inlet or other drainage structure to compensate for the increase in discharge rate. Sections having excessive drainage as examined by the engineer will receive a score of 0. Shorter sections that interconnect with adjacent drainage systems or not having excessive drainage will receive a score of 10. Ponding Area – Ponding is the buildup of rainwater due to low lying areas that do not have a defined drainage path. Curb installation will create a drainage path for the ponding areas, and will prevent standing water along pavement edges and on adjacent properties. Areas along the segment being where curb construction will improve drainage conditions will be scored a 10. Segments that appear to have little or no effect on drainage will receive a score of 0. Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 9 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Functional Classification- Roadways with a higher classification will have increased traffic and pavement sections. This condition will increase the difficulty of construction and increase the cost of replacing the adjacent pavement. Curb installed on the major classification roads will score a 0 and curb installed on the minor classifications will be scored a 10. Water Quality Potential-Roadways with the ability to provide water quality features such as raingardens or filter strips will increase the water quality of the runoff. These features usually require space and grade to create a horizon of material used in filtering the water. Areas that facilitate these features will receive a score of 10. While areas that are difficult to Utility Impacts- Utility conflicts, both above and below ground, can create significant obstacles to curb construction. The number of utilities and the size of each will impact the difficulty of curb construction. Areas that, in the opinion of the engineer have numerous or significantly large utilities will score lower than areas with no utilities. Accordingly, less than 2 utility conflicts will score 10, 2-4 conflicts will score a 5, and 4 or more utility conflicts will score a 0. Miscellaneous Impacts- Items in this category will be used to define any features that are not defined in other criteria. These features will increase the difficulty of construction curb and will be scored through a range. Fewer items will score higher than more items. Less than 2 impacts will score a 10, 2-4 impacts will score a 5, and greater than 4 will be assigned a score of 0. ROW required – the area adjacent to the roadway that will be required for curb construction is right of way. If right of way is required, the cost of installing curb will increase. The impact of right of way, either permanent or temporary, is measured in a scale from small to large. The smaller the necessary right of way the higher the score. if the right of way area is small (5 ft) the score will be 10. If the right of way area is large (15ft) the score will be 0. Moderate or average right of way needs (10 ft) will Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 10 City of St. Charles, Missouri score 5. Cost of right of way will vary depending on commercial or residential property. Right of way for commercial property will be valued at $15 per sq. ft. Residential right of way is valued at $4 per sq. ft. Length of Section – the length of curb section that will be constructed will affect the overall cost of construction. The section must have similar properties that reflect a consistent score. That is, if the section features change from one end to the other, the section will be broken and scored separately based on its individual criteria. Conversely, long sections exhibiting similar properties may be scored jointly. However, their extra length will indicate a high cost when reviewing cost by street. A value of 250 ft will be used for an average street length. Streets less than 200 ft. will be scored a 10. Street lengths between 200 and 600 will be scored a 5 and street section longer than 600 feet will score a 0.

6 Group Weighting Factor The weighting factor for each group of categories puts importance to the group’s overall contribution to the final difficulty rating. Each group was reviewed by a team from the City and the GBA team. The weighting factor considers history of projects and future planning in the development of the score. The weighting factors range from one being the least important to ten being the most important group. The weighting factors are easily modified if the importance of the category has changed.

7 Data Collection Field Investigations To illustrate the field investigation and data collection the following no-curb street was selected to show a need for extra parking. The street selected was Bainbridge Street between N Second and Alley 259 located in Ward 1. The street is narrow with on drainage structure near the middle of the section. The section has both private and public ownership and no sidewalks. The average parking score for this section was 4 out of a possible 5, with a weighted score of 11. Overall the total weighted score was 163 or a medium on the priority list. Figure No. 1 show the completed Field Report for this section.

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 11 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Figure No. 1: Field Report

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 12 City of St. Charles, Missouri

8 Results and Discussion The summation of the category scores and applied weighting factors result in an overall difficulty rating. The rating score is measured on a scale of high priority, medium priority, or low priority with higher scores being a higher priority and lower scores indicating lower priority. The results of the no-curb scoring are best displayed in the GIS map base. A database was used to compile data for each segment of no-curb roads. The database was then linked to the GIS map to map the no-curb sections. The difficulty of the section is represented by a green- yellow-red color scheme indicating the relative ease or difficulty of construction. An overall score of 185 or more will rank as High Priority and will be indicated on the GIS map with a green color. An overall score of 150 to 185 will rate as medium priority and will be indicated as yellow on the map. A score less than 150 will rate as low priority and will be indicated by the red color on the map. As indicated in the first part of the report these scores can be adjusted as category importance changes.

8.1 Ward 1 Results and Discussion Ward 1 was the pilot study area for the project. Ward 1 was the most diverse area with many legacy streets and alleys from some of the oldest platted areas. Of 133 no-curb segments investigated, 78 were scored as high priority, 46 were medium priority and the remaining 9 were low priority. Construction cost per foot ranged from $312 per foot to $80 per foot. Figure 8.1 shows the prioritized map of Ward 1.

8.2 Ward 2 Results and Discussion Ward 2 had 14 no-curb segments. 9 of Ward 2’s streets scored as a high priority for construction. 2 no-curb segments scored medium priority and 3 scored low priority. Construction cost ranged from $277 per foot to $80 per foot. Figure 8.2 shows the prioritized map of Ward 2.

8.3 Ward 3 Results and Discussion Ward 3 had 4 no-curb segments. All segments scored a high priority. Construction cost for all segments were $145 per foot. Figure 8.3 shows the prioritized map of Ward 3.

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 13 City of St. Charles, Missouri

8.4 Ward 4 Results and Discussion Ward 4 had 30 no-curb segments. 18 high priority, 10 medium priority, and 2 low priority no- curb segments. Construction cost for the Ward 4 range from $90 to $151 per foot. Figure 8.4 shows the prioritized map of Ward 4.

8.5 Ward 5 Results and Discussion Ward 5 is the smallest ward with 2 no-curb segments. Both are medium priority and both have estimated construction cost of $160 per foot. Figure 8.5 shows the prioritized map of Ward 5

8.6 Ward 6 Results and Discussion Ward 6 has 31 no-curb segments with no high priority segments, 18 medium priority and 13 low priority segments. Construction cost range from $145 to $250 per foot. Figure 8.6 shows the prioritized map of Ward 6

8.7 Ward 7 Results and Discussion Ward 7 had 6 no-curb segments, all high priority. The construction cost range from $90 to $110 per foot. Figure 8.7 shows the prioritized map of Ward 7

8.8 Ward 8 Results and Discussion Ward 8 has the most no-curb segments with 232. 162 High priority, 65 medium priority, and 5 low priority segments. Construction cost ranged from $329 per foot to $90 per foot. Figure 8.8 shows the prioritized map of Ward 8.

8.9 Ward 9 Results and Discussion Ward 9 had 7 no-curb segments. All segments were high priority. Construction cost ranged from $330 per foot to $80 per foot. Figure 8.9 shows the prioritized map of Ward 9

8.10 Ward 10 Results and Discussion Ward 10 is mostly commercial or industrial and has 3 no-curb segments. All segments were high priority. Construction cost ranged from $105 per foot to $80 per foot. Figure 8.10 shows the prioritized map of Ward 10

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 14 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 15 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 16 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 17 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 18 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 19 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 20 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 21 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 22 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 23 City of St. Charles, Missouri

Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 24 City of St. Charles, Missouri

9 Conclusion The results of the field investigation and scoring rubrics have yielded a mapping database that is easily loaded into a readable GIS format. Through this format, the relative ease of determining the constructability of curb and gutter for individual roadway segments can be determined at a glance. Through field investigation and collaborative reviews with the City, the no-curb segments throughout all wards have been investigated and ranked to determine the ease of construction. A database of the information has been constructed using an Excel spreadsheet that can easily rank or sort the no-curb segments by groups or by category criteria. This database is then linked to the GIS mapping system to show the no-curb roadway segments and is easily added as a single layer in the mapping. The database can be interactively changed by modifying the weighting factors according to changes in the importance of each group. Comprehensive Curb and Gutter Evaluation P a g e | 25 City of St. Charles, Missouri

10 Appendices Field Investigation Report.

Comprehensive Curb Gutter Analysis: Ward 1 Scoring

Parking Score Constructability Score Plan. Score Drainage Score Engineering Engineering Score Cost Score Total Score Evaluation of Total Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Water Quality Potential Weighted Score Weighted Score ward Unique ID Branch_nam Street Ahead Street Behind Weighted Parking Score Weighted Constructability Score Weighted Planning Score Weighted Drainage Score Water Quality Potential Score Weighted Engineering Score Weighted Cost Score Total Weighted Score Evaluation of Total Weighted Score (Low/Medium/High Priority)

2 6649 SOUTH DR EOP BOONES LICK RD 15 25 67 60 0 15 88 269 High Priority 2 6649 SOUTH DR EOP BOONES LICK RD 15 25 67 60 0 15 88 269 High Priority 10 7282 ELM POINT RD EOP HASTINGS WAY 8 29 80 60 0 15 72 263 High Priority 8 5472 ISLAND HARBOR DR MERTEN CROSSING ST ISLAND HARBOR DR 8 29 53 60 5 23 72 244 High Priority 8 5504 GALT HOUSE DR CIVIC GREEN DR SHUTTEN ST 23 29 53 40 0 15 85 244 High Priority 8 5410 SIMEON BUNKER ST NEW TOWN LAKE DR SIMEON BUNKER ST 8 36 53 40 0 15 87 238 High Priority 8 5430 GRANGER BLVD NEW TOWN LAKE DR MILLINGTON DR 8 36 53 40 0 15 87 238 High Priority 8 5430 GRANGER BLVD NEW TOWN LAKE DR MILLINGTON DR 8 36 53 40 0 15 87 238 High Priority 8 5430 GRANGER BLVD NEW TOWN LAKE DR MILLINGTON DR 8 36 53 40 0 15 87 238 High Priority 8 5487 TARN ST HEMPSTEAD ST TARN ST 23 29 53 40 0 15 76 236 High Priority 8 5518 DOMAIN ST N NEW TOWN AV CIVIC LN 23 29 53 40 0 15 76 236 High Priority 8 5528 N NEW TOWN AV CANAL ST N MESTER ST 23 29 53 40 0 15 76 236 High Priority 8 7285 ELM POINT RD GRANDVIEW DR OLD ELM ST 4 21 80 40 0 15 74 234 High Priority 8 4377 WALSH CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 40 60 0 15 72 231 High Priority 8 4377 WALSH CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 40 60 0 15 72 231 High Priority 8 4377 WALSH CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 40 60 0 15 72 231 High Priority 8 4618 ELM ST ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR ELMPOINT RD 8 29 80 40 0 15 60 231 High Priority 8 5430 GRANGER BLVD NEW TOWN LAKE DR MILLINGTON DR 8 36 53 40 0 15 79 230 High Priority 8 7496 CANAL ST N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 8 36 53 40 0 15 79 230 High Priority 7 7111 BOSCHERT DR EOP W ADAMS ST 8 29 53 40 0 15 85 229 High Priority 9 4998 PRAIRIE HAUTE DR BELLEPLANE DR SIBLEY ST 8 29 53 40 0 15 85 229 High Priority 8 5504 GALT HOUSE DR CIVIC GREEN DR SHUTTEN ST 23 29 53 40 0 15 68 227 High Priority 1 7044 ALLEY 49 FRENCH ST WOOD ST 8 18 27 60 10 30 85 227 High Priority 1 7043 ALLEY 49 FRENCH ST WOOD ST 8 18 27 60 10 30 85 227 High Priority 1 7043 WOOD ST ALLEY 49 N THIRD ST 8 18 27 60 10 30 85 227 High Priority 1 7044 WOOD ST ALLEY 49 N THIRD ST 8 18 27 60 10 30 85 227 High Priority 7 4929 CARR ST ALLEY 191 VINE ST 8 32 53 40 0 15 77 225 High Priority 1 4750 N MAIN ST N MAIN ST N MAIN ST 15 29 27 40 10 30 85 225 High Priority 8 5569 S NEW TOWN AV DOMAIN ST S MESTER ST 19 29 53 40 0 15 68 224 High Priority 8 5567 S NEW TOWN AV CANAL ST NEW TOWN DR 19 29 53 40 0 15 68 224 High Priority 8 4377 WALSH CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 40 60 0 15 64 222 High Priority 8 4377 WALSH CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 40 60 0 15 64 222 High Priority 8 4377 WALSH CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 40 60 0 15 64 222 High Priority 8 4377 WALSH CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 40 60 0 15 64 222 High Priority 8 5430 GRANGER BLVD NEW TOWN LAKE DR MILLINGTON DR 8 36 53 40 0 15 70 222 High Priority 8 5096 OLD ELM ST SUMMIT POINTE CT ELM POINT RD 0 25 67 40 5 23 67 221 High Priority 4 6732 WESTVIEW DR EOP OAKLAND DR 4 25 53 40 0 15 83 220 High Priority 1 4751 N MAIN ST N MAIN ST N MAIN ST 15 25 27 40 10 30 83 220 High Priority 8 4372 MUELLER RD N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 68 220 High Priority 11 12349 BOSCHERTOWN RD CARRIAGE CROSSING DR BOSCHERTOWN RD 8 29 27 60 10 15 80 218 High Priority 7 4713 ALLEY 199 EOP CARR ST 0 32 53 40 0 15 77 218 High Priority 7 4713 ALLEY 199 EOP CARR ST 0 32 53 40 0 15 77 218 High Priority 10 4284 ELM ST ELM POINT RD OLD ELM ST 8 25 80 20 5 23 63 218 High Priority 8 4618 ELM ST ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR ELMPOINT RD 8 29 67 40 0 15 60 217 High Priority 8 4618 ELM ST ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR ELMPOINT RD 8 29 67 40 0 15 60 217 High Priority 1 7013 LAWRENCE ST ALLEY 27 N SECOND ST 8 25 27 50 5 23 85 217 High Priority 1 7013 ALLEY 27 LAWRENCE ST MONTGOMERY ST 8 25 27 50 5 23 85 217 High Priority 1 7020 ALLEY 27 LAWRENCE ST MONTGOMERY ST 8 25 27 50 5 23 85 217 High Priority 1 7020 LAWRENCE ST ALLEY 27 N SECOND ST 8 25 27 50 5 23 85 217 High Priority 1 4752 N RIVER RD BLUE BIRD DR N MAIN ST 15 25 40 40 10 30 67 217 High Priority 1 4751 N MAIN ST N MAIN ST N MAIN ST 15 25 40 40 10 30 67 217 High Priority 8 5167 GLAZER WAY EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 39 27 40 0 15 88 217 High Priority 8 5167 GLAZER WAY EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 39 27 40 0 15 88 217 High Priority 8 5167 GLAZER WAY EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 39 27 40 0 15 88 217 High Priority 8 5167 GLAZER WAY EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 39 27 40 0 15 88 217 High Priority 8 5167 GLAZER WAY EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 39 27 40 0 15 88 217 High Priority Comprehensive Curb Gutter Analysis: Ward 1 Scoring

ward Unique ID Branch_nam Street Ahead Street Behind Weighted Parking Score Weighted Constructability Score Weighted Planning Score Weighted Drainage Score Water Quality Potential Score Weighted Engineering Score Weighted Cost Score Total Weighted Score Evaluation of Total Weighted Score (Low/Medium/High Priority)

1 4751 N MAIN ST N MAIN ST N MAIN ST 15 29 27 40 10 30 76 216 High Priority 1 4750 N MAIN ST N MAIN ST N MAIN ST 15 29 27 40 10 30 76 216 High Priority 1 4750 N MAIN ST N MAIN ST N MAIN ST 15 29 27 40 10 30 76 216 High Priority 4 6024 EASTVIEW DR VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY LAKEVIEW DR 8 25 53 40 0 15 75 216 High Priority 4 6024 EASTVIEW DR VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY LAKEVIEW DR 8 25 53 40 0 15 75 216 High Priority 8 5161 HUSTER RD BETHMAN RD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD 8 18 80 40 5 23 48 215 High Priority 8 5161 HUSTER RD BETHMAN RD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD 8 18 80 40 5 23 48 215 High Priority 8 7496 CANAL ST N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 8 36 53 40 0 15 62 213 High Priority 1 6683 ALLEY 157 N KINGSHIGHWAY ST N TENTH ST 15 25 27 40 5 23 83 213 High Priority 1 6882 N TENTH ST ALLEY 157 WASHINGTON ST 15 25 27 40 5 23 83 213 High Priority 1 6682 ALLEY 157 N KINGSHIGHWAY ST N TENTH ST 15 25 27 40 5 23 83 213 High Priority 1 6883 N TENTH ST ALLEY 157 WASHINGTON ST 15 25 27 40 5 23 83 213 High Priority 10 4284 ELM ST ELM POINT RD OLD ELM ST 8 25 67 20 5 23 71 213 High Priority 9 4999 PRAIRIE HAUTE DR BELLEPLANE DR BELLEPLANE DR 8 29 53 40 0 15 68 212 High Priority 9 4999 PRAIRIE HAUTE DR BELLEPLANE DR BELLEPLANE DR 8 29 53 40 0 15 68 212 High Priority 4 6732 WESTVIEW DR EOP OAKLAND DR 4 25 53 40 0 15 75 212 High Priority 4 6732 WESTVIEW DR EOP OAKLAND DR 4 25 53 40 0 15 75 212 High Priority 1 4751 N MAIN ST N MAIN ST N MAIN ST 15 25 27 40 10 30 75 212 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4372 MUELLER RD N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4372 MUELLER RD N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4372 MUELLER RD N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4372 MUELLER RD N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 8 4372 MUELLER RD N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 60 211 High Priority 9 5923 PAULA DR PAULA DR CONNIE DR 8 21 53 40 0 15 74 211 High Priority 8 5164 FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWYFOUNTAIN E LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 15 29 27 40 0 15 85 210 High Priority 8 5269 NEW TOWN LAKE DR GRANGER BLVD SOUTH SHUTTEN ST 23 29 27 40 0 15 76 209 High Priority 8 4375 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD 15 32 53 20 0 15 73 209 High Priority 8 4375 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD 15 32 53 20 0 15 73 209 High Priority 8 7287 CLOVER EOP W ADAMS ST 0 25 53 40 0 15 75 208 High Priority 8 7287 CLOVER EOP W ADAMS ST 0 25 53 40 0 15 75 208 High Priority 1 7049 FRENCH ST N THIRD ST ALLEY 31 8 18 27 50 5 23 83 208 High Priority 1 7048 ALLEY 49 FRENCH ST WOOD ST 8 18 27 50 5 23 83 208 High Priority 1 7047 ALLEY 49 FRENCH ST WOOD ST 8 18 27 50 5 23 83 208 High Priority 1 7047 ALLEY 50 OLIVE ST FRENCH ST 8 18 27 50 5 23 83 208 High Priority 1 7048 ALLEY 50 OLIVE ST FRENCH ST 8 18 27 50 5 23 83 208 High Priority 2 6663 BARBOUR ST S SIXTH ST S BENTON AVE 4 21 53 40 0 15 74 207 High Priority 4 6735 LAKEVIEW DR EOP PARK DR 8 21 53 30 0 15 80 207 High Priority 8 5153 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HIGHWAY 370 W 8 32 40 40 0 0 86 205 High Priority 8 5153 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HIGHWAY 370 W 8 32 40 40 0 0 86 205 High Priority 8 5153 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HIGHWAY 370 W 8 32 40 40 0 0 86 205 High Priority 2 4817 TOMPKINS ST EOP S EIGHTH ST 11 14 53 40 0 15 71 205 High Priority 2 4817 TOMPKINS ST EOP S EIGHTH ST 11 14 53 40 0 15 71 205 High Priority 1 5121 RIVERVIEW LN RIVERVIEW LN RIVERVIEW LN 4 29 27 40 10 30 76 205 High Priority 1 7023 ALLEY 28 RANDOLPH ST BAYARD ST 8 25 27 40 5 23 83 205 High Priority 1 7024 BAYARD ST N THIRD ST ALLEY 28 8 25 27 40 5 23 83 205 High Priority 1 7024 BAYARD ST N THIRD ST ALLEY 28 8 25 27 40 5 23 83 205 High Priority 1 7034 N THIRD ST RANDOLPH ST BAYARD ST 8 25 27 40 5 23 83 205 High Priority 1 6959 ALLEY 111 FRANKLIN ST DECATUR ST 15 25 27 40 0 15 83 205 High Priority 4 4228 PRALLE LN OLD HIGHWAY 94 S HIGHWAY 94 S 8 25 27 40 5 23 83 205 High Priority 4 4228 PRALLE LN OLD HIGHWAY 94 S HIGHWAY 94 S 8 25 27 40 5 23 83 205 High Priority 1 7023 BAYARD ST N THIRD ST ALLEY 28 8 25 27 40 5 23 83 205 High Priority Comprehensive Curb Gutter Analysis: Ward 1 Scoring

1 6959 ALLEY 112 MORGAN ST FRANKLIN ST 15 25 27 40 0 15 83 205 High Priority 8 4373 MUELLER RD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR N RUE ST 15 29 53 20 0 15 72 204 High Priority 8 4373 MUELLER RD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR N RUE ST 15 29 53 20 0 15 72 204 High Priority 8 4373 MUELLER RD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR N RUE ST 15 29 53 20 0 15 72 204 High Priority 8 7154 W ADAMS ST CLOVER KEN DR 4 25 53 40 0 15 67 204 High Priority 8 7154 W ADAMS ST CLOVER KEN DR 4 25 53 40 0 15 67 204 High Priority 1 4751 N MAIN ST N MAIN ST N MAIN ST 15 25 27 40 10 30 67 203 High Priority 8 5157 NEW TOWN BLVD MB CORPORATE CT SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR 8 25 40 40 5 8 83 203 High Priority 8 5501 GALT HOUSE DR GALT HOUSE ALLEY CIVIC GREEN DR 23 29 53 20 0 15 64 203 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 51 203 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 51 203 High Priority 8 4374 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 51 203 High Priority 8 4372 MUELLER RD N RUE ST GOLDEN BROOK DR 15 29 53 40 0 15 51 203 High Priority 8 5169 SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 15 25 40 40 0 15 67 202 High Priority 8 5164 FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWYFOUNTAIN E LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 15 29 27 40 0 15 76 201 High Priority 8 5164 FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWYFOUNTAIN E LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 15 29 27 40 0 15 76 201 High Priority 8 5164 FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWYFOUNTAIN E LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 15 29 27 40 0 15 76 201 High Priority 8 5164 FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWYFOUNTAIN E LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 15 29 27 40 0 15 76 201 High Priority 1 7039 RANDOLPH ST N SECOND ST ALLEY 16 4 18 0 70 5 23 87 201 High Priority 1 7039 ALLEY 16 WOOD ST RANDOLPH ST 4 18 0 70 5 23 87 201 High Priority 1 7026 ALLEY 47 EOP BAYARD ST 4 25 27 40 5 23 83 201 High Priority 1 7026 ALLEY 46 BAYARD ST LAWRENCE ST 4 25 27 40 5 23 83 201 High Priority 8 5154 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 8 29 40 40 0 0 85 201 High Priority 8 4375 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD 15 32 53 20 0 15 65 200 High Priority 8 4375 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD 15 32 53 20 0 15 65 200 High Priority 8 4375 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD 15 32 53 20 0 15 65 200 High Priority 1 7574 WOOD ST N FIFTH ST ALLEY 72 8 21 27 40 5 23 82 200 High Priority 1 7574 WOOD ST N FIFTH ST ALLEY 72 8 21 27 40 5 23 82 200 High Priority 1 6865 N BENTON AVE ALLEY 107 JEFFERSON ST 19 18 27 40 0 15 81 199 High Priority 4 6734 LAKEVIEW DR EASTVIEW DR PARK DR 8 21 53 30 0 15 72 199 High Priority 4 6734 LAKEVIEW DR EASTVIEW DR PARK DR 8 21 53 30 0 15 72 199 High Priority 4 6733 LAKEVIEW DR OAKLAND DR EASTVIEW DR 8 21 53 30 0 15 72 199 High Priority 1 7064 ALLEY 52 WILKINSON ST HOWARD ST 15 18 27 50 5 23 66 198 High Priority 1 7064 ALLEY 53 BAINBRIDGE ST WILKINSON ST 15 18 27 50 5 23 66 198 High Priority 4 6736 PARK DR EOP LAKEVIEW DR 15 25 53 40 0 15 50 198 High Priority 4 6736 PARK DR EOP LAKEVIEW DR 15 25 53 40 0 15 50 198 High Priority 3 6535 OLD FRIEDENS RD FORTRESS CT FLOYD DR 15 25 53 20 10 30 54 198 High Priority 3 6535 OLD FRIEDENS RD FORTRESS CT FLOYD DR 15 25 53 20 10 30 54 198 High Priority 1 6036 ALLEY 128 FRANKLIN ST DECATUR ST 8 25 27 40 0 15 83 198 High Priority 1 6037 ALLEY 128 FRANKLIN ST DECATUR ST 8 25 27 40 0 15 83 198 High Priority 1 6961 ALLEY 91 MORGAN ST FRANKLIN ST 15 25 27 40 5 8 83 198 High Priority 8 5153 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HIGHWAY 370 W 8 32 40 40 0 0 77 197 High Priority 8 5153 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HIGHWAY 370 W 8 32 40 40 0 0 77 197 High Priority 8 5153 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HIGHWAY 370 W 8 32 40 40 0 0 77 197 High Priority 1 4494 ALLEY 12 CLARK ST ADAMS ST 8 36 27 40 0 0 87 197 High Priority 8 12312 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD 8 25 27 40 5 23 75 197 High Priority 8 4376 KARYDAN CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 25 27 40 0 15 75 197 High Priority 8 4376 KARYDAN CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 25 27 40 0 15 75 197 High Priority 8 4376 KARYDAN CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 25 27 40 0 15 75 197 High Priority 8 4376 KARYDAN CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 25 27 40 0 15 75 197 High Priority 4 7774 OLD HIGHWAY 94 S OLD HIGHWAY 94 S OLD HIGHWAY 94 S 8 25 27 40 5 23 75 197 High Priority 8 7286 ELM POINT RD W ADAMS ST GRANDVIEW DR 4 21 67 20 0 15 70 196 High Priority 8 4266 ELM ST ELM ST OFF ELM ST ON 8 25 40 40 0 0 83 196 High Priority 1 4754 MELODY CT BLUE BIRD DR BLUE BIRD DR 4 21 27 40 10 30 74 196 High Priority 1 4754 MELODY CT BLUE BIRD DR BLUE BIRD DR 4 21 27 40 10 30 74 196 High Priority 8 4373 MUELLER RD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR N RUE ST 15 29 53 20 0 15 64 196 High Priority 8 4373 MUELLER RD ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR N RUE ST 15 29 53 20 0 15 64 196 High Priority 1 6978 ALLEY 93 N BENTON AVE LAWRENCE ST 8 18 27 40 5 23 81 195 High Priority 1 6978 ALLEY 92 LAWRENCE ST MORGAN ST 8 18 27 40 5 23 81 195 High Priority Comprehensive Curb Gutter Analysis: Ward 1 Scoring

8 5072 HILLTOP DR END OF ASPHALT KEN DR 0 21 53 40 0 15 65 195 High Priority 8 5072 HILLTOP DR END OF ASPHALT KEN DR 0 21 53 40 0 15 65 195 High Priority 8 12358 MILLSTONE CORPORATEMILSTONE DR PKWY MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 27 40 0 15 70 195 High Priority 8 5172 MILSTONE PKWY STREET END MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 27 40 0 15 70 195 High Priority 8 5172 MILSTONE PKWY STREET END MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 27 40 0 15 70 195 High Priority 8 12358 MILLSTONE CORPORATEMILSTONE DR PKWY MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 27 40 0 15 70 195 High Priority 8 5501 GALT HOUSE DR GALT HOUSE ALLEY CIVIC GREEN DR 23 29 53 20 0 15 55 195 High Priority 2 4600 ZUMBEHL RD OLD HIGHWAY 94 S HIGHWAY 94 S 15 29 27 40 0 0 85 195 High Priority 2 4419 FIRST CAPITOL LOOP FIRST CAPITOL DR FIRST CAPITOL DR OFF 15 29 27 40 5 8 76 194 High Priority 2 4417 FIRST CAPITOL LOOP FIRST CAPITOL DR FIRST CAPITOL DR 15 29 27 40 5 8 76 194 High Priority 8 5168 MB CORPORATE CT EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 29 27 40 0 15 76 194 High Priority 8 5168 MB CORPORATE CT EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 29 27 40 0 15 76 194 High Priority 8 5168 MB CORPORATE CT EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 29 27 40 0 15 76 194 High Priority 2 4417 FIRST CAPITOL LOOP FIRST CAPITOL DR FIRST CAPITOL DR 15 29 27 40 5 8 76 194 High Priority 1 6035 N SEVENTH ST FRANKLIN ST DECATUR ST 15 18 40 40 0 0 81 194 High Priority 1 6962 ALLEY 91 MORGAN ST FRANKLIN ST 11 25 27 40 5 8 83 194 High Priority 8 5169 SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 15 25 40 40 0 15 58 193 High Priority 8 5169 SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 15 25 40 40 0 15 58 193 High Priority 8 5473 ISLAND HARBOR DR ISLAND HARBOR DR BOSCHERTOWN RD 8 29 27 40 5 23 68 193 High Priority 1 7037 ALLEY 29 WOOD ST RANDOLPH ST 4 25 27 40 5 23 75 193 High Priority 1 7037 ALLEY 28 RANDOLPH ST BAYARD ST 4 25 27 40 5 23 75 193 High Priority 1 7038 ALLEY 28 RANDOLPH ST BAYARD ST 4 25 27 40 5 23 75 193 High Priority 1 7038 ALLEY 29 WOOD ST RANDOLPH ST 4 25 27 40 5 23 75 193 High Priority 8 5269 NEW TOWN LAKE DR GRANGER BLVD SOUTH SHUTTEN ST 23 29 27 40 0 15 60 192 High Priority 8 5154 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 8 29 40 40 0 0 76 192 High Priority 8 5154 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 8 29 40 40 0 0 76 192 High Priority 8 4375 MUELLER RD NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD 15 32 53 20 0 15 57 192 High Priority 7 5742 EDGEWOOD DR EOP ELM ST 4 18 67 20 0 15 68 192 High Priority 7 5742 EDGEWOOD DR EOP ELM ST 4 18 67 20 0 15 68 192 High Priority 1 6977 ALLEY 92 LAWRENCE ST MORGAN ST 4 18 27 40 5 23 81 192 High Priority 1 6977 ALLEY 93 N BENTON AVE LAWRENCE ST 4 18 27 40 5 23 81 192 High Priority 9 6668 BELLE PLAINE DR SIBLEY ST PRAIRIE HAUTE DR 8 25 53 20 0 15 71 192 High Priority 9 6667 BELLE PLAINE DR PRAIRIE HAUTE DR PRAIRIE HAUTE DR 8 25 53 20 0 15 71 192 High Priority 1 12348 LITTLE HILLS IND BLVD LITTLE HILLS EXPY LITTLE HILLS IND BLVD 15 29 40 20 10 15 72 191 High Priority 4 6617 HEMSATH RD EOP BLUESTONE DR 8 25 27 60 0 0 71 190 High Priority 1 6961 ALLEY 90 FRANKLIN ST DECATUR ST 8 25 27 40 5 8 83 190 High Priority 8 5248 BOSCHERTOWN RD HWY B ISLAND HARBOR DR 8 21 40 40 0 15 65 189 High Priority 3 6535 OLD FRIEDENS RD FORTRESS CT FLOYD DR 15 25 53 20 10 30 46 189 High Priority 3 6535 OLD FRIEDENS RD FORTRESS CT FLOYD DR 15 25 53 20 10 30 46 189 High Priority 1 7005 ALLEY 26 MONTGOMERY ST MORGAN ST 8 25 27 40 0 15 75 189 High Priority 8 12312 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD 8 25 27 40 5 23 67 188 High Priority 8 12311 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD 8 25 27 40 5 23 67 188 High Priority 8 4376 KARYDAN CT EOP ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 15 25 27 40 0 15 67 188 High Priority 4 7774 OLD HIGHWAY 94 S OLD HIGHWAY 94 S OLD HIGHWAY 94 S 8 25 27 40 5 23 67 188 High Priority 8 7286 ELM POINT RD W ADAMS ST GRANDVIEW DR 4 21 67 20 0 15 61 188 High Priority 1 6037 ALLEY 129 MORGAN ST FRANKLIN ST 8 18 27 40 0 15 81 188 High Priority 1 6036 ALLEY 129 MORGAN ST FRANKLIN ST 8 18 27 40 0 15 81 188 High Priority 9 4997 COLLEGE DR EOP SIBLEY ST 8 25 53 30 0 15 56 187 High Priority 1 4369 LITTLE HILLS EXPY BOSCHERTOWN RD N CORPORATE HLS 15 32 40 20 10 15 65 187 High Priority 1 4362 LITTLE HILLS EXPY S CORPORATE HILLS DR MEL WETTER PKWY 15 32 40 20 10 15 65 187 High Priority 1 4365 LITTLE HILLS EXPY S CORPORATE HILLS DR MEL WETTER PKWY 15 32 40 20 10 15 65 187 High Priority 8 7155 W ADAMS ST ELM POINT RD CLOVER 8 21 53 20 0 15 70 187 High Priority 4 6023 OAKLAND DR EOP WESTVIEW DR 8 21 53 20 0 15 70 187 High Priority 4 6023 OAKLAND DR EOP WESTVIEW DR 8 21 53 20 0 15 70 187 High Priority 8 5248 BOSCHERTOWN RD ISLAND HARBOR DR SILVERTRAIL DR 8 29 27 40 5 8 76 186 High Priority 8 12305 BOSCHERTOWN RD ISLAND HARBOR DR SILVERTRAIL DR 8 29 27 40 5 8 76 186 High Priority 1 6962 ALLEY 90 FRANKLIN ST DECATUR ST 4 25 27 40 5 8 83 186 High Priority 8 5155 NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIAL DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 83 186 High Priority 8 5155 NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIAL DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 83 186 High Priority Comprehensive Curb Gutter Analysis: Ward 1 Scoring

8 4260 ELM ST ELM ST ON MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 83 186 High Priority 8 4260 ELM ST ELM ST ON MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 83 186 High Priority 8 4260 ELM ST ELM ST ON MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 83 186 High Priority 8 4260 ELM ST ELM ST ON MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 83 186 High Priority 8 5168 MB CORPORATE CT EOP NEW TOWN BLVD 8 29 27 40 0 15 68 186 High Priority 2 4275 RIVERSIDE DR S S MAIN ST ALLEY 1 15 29 27 40 0 15 60 185 Medium Priority 1 7031 RANDOLPH ST N FOURTH ST N THIRD ST 4 25 27 40 5 23 67 185 Medium Priority 1 7031 RANDOLPH ST N FOURTH ST N THIRD ST 4 25 27 40 5 23 67 185 Medium Priority 8 5154 NEW TOWN BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES BLVD 8 29 40 40 0 0 68 184 Medium Priority 1 4369 LITTLE HILLS EXPY S CORPORATE HILLS DR MEL WETTER PKWY 15 29 40 20 10 15 64 182 Medium Priority 1 4369 LITTLE HILLS EXPY S CORPORATE HILLS DR MEL WETTER PKWY 15 29 40 20 10 15 64 182 Medium Priority 1 4754 MELODY CT BLUE BIRD DR BLUE BIRD DR 4 29 27 40 0 15 68 182 Medium Priority 6 4270 ZUMBEHL RD ZUMBEHL RD ZUMBEHL RD 15 25 27 40 0 0 75 182 Medium Priority 1 4721 DE ROY LN N SEVENTH ST N SIXTH ST 8 18 27 40 0 15 73 180 Medium Priority 8 5156 NEW TOWN BLVD SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR MUELLER RD 8 25 40 40 0 0 67 179 Medium Priority 6 4496 ZUMBEHL RD ZUMBEHL RD VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY 8 29 27 40 0 0 76 179 Medium Priority 6 4496 ZUMBEHL RD ZUMBEHL RD VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY 8 29 27 40 0 0 76 179 Medium Priority 8 7155 W ADAMS ST ELM POINT RD CLOVER 8 21 53 20 0 15 61 179 Medium Priority 6 7555 CENTRAL DR STRONG DR MOORE AVE 8 25 0 60 0 15 71 178 Medium Priority 8 5249 BOSCHERTOWN RD ISLAND HARBOR DR SILVERTRAIL DR 8 25 40 20 0 15 71 178 Medium Priority 8 5249 BOSCHERTOWN RD ISLAND HARBOR DR SILVERTRAIL DR 8 29 27 40 5 8 68 178 Medium Priority 1 5250 BOSCHERTOWN RD SILVERTRAIL DR CARRIAGE CROSSING DR 8 29 27 40 5 8 68 178 Medium Priority 8 5155 NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIAL DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 74 178 Medium Priority 8 5155 NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIAL DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 74 178 Medium Priority 1 7008 MONTGOMERY ST ALLEY 45 N THIRD ST 8 11 27 40 5 23 70 178 Medium Priority 1 7007 MONTGOMERY ST ALLEY 45 N THIRD ST 8 11 27 40 5 23 70 178 Medium Priority 1 7007 ALLEY 45 MONTGOMERY ST MORGAN ST 8 11 27 40 5 23 70 178 Medium Priority 1 7008 ALLEY 45 MONTGOMERY ST MORGAN ST 8 11 27 40 5 23 70 178 Medium Priority 1 4367 LITTLE HILLS EXPY S CORPORATE HILLS DR MEL WETTER PKWY 15 25 40 20 10 15 63 178 Medium Priority 1 4753 BLUE BIRD DR N RIVER RD MELODY CT 8 21 27 40 0 15 65 176 Medium Priority 1 4721 DE ROY LN N SEVENTH ST N SIXTH ST 8 14 27 40 0 15 71 175 Medium Priority 6 4264 HARRY S TRUMAN BLVD POINT WEST BLVD FRANK DR 15 39 40 0 0 0 80 174 Medium Priority 1 7556 ALLEY 35 TRANSIT ST MOORE AVE 8 21 0 60 0 15 70 174 Medium Priority 1 7555 STRONG DR CENTRAL DR TRANIST ST 8 21 0 60 0 15 70 174 Medium Priority 1 7556 ALLEY 35 TRANSIT ST MOORE AVE 8 21 0 60 0 15 70 174 Medium Priority 6 4463 ZUMBEHL RD FAYE AVE CITY BOUNDRY 15 25 27 40 0 0 67 173 Medium Priority 1 6865 N BENTON AVE ALLEY 107 JEFFERSON ST 19 18 0 40 0 15 81 173 Medium Priority 8 5156 NEW TOWN BLVD SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR MUELLER RD 8 25 40 40 0 0 58 171 Medium Priority 1 5128 FOX HILL RD BOSCHERTOWN RD COTTONWOOD DR 15 25 40 20 0 0 71 171 Medium Priority 1 5128 FOX HILL RD BOSCHERTOWN RD COTTONWOOD DR 15 25 40 20 0 0 71 171 Medium Priority 1 6975 LAWRENCE ST ALLEY 113 N BENTON AVE 8 11 27 40 0 15 70 170 Medium Priority 1 6975 LAWRENCE ST N KINGSHIGHWAY ST ALLEY 113 8 11 27 40 0 15 70 170 Medium Priority 8 5155 NEW TOWN BLVD MUELLER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIAL DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 66 169 Medium Priority 8 4260 ELM ST ELM ST ON MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR 8 36 40 20 0 0 66 169 Medium Priority 8 5166 FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES PKWY E NEW TOWN BLVD 15 29 27 20 0 15 64 169 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 78 167 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 78 167 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 78 167 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 78 167 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 78 167 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 78 167 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 78 167 Medium Priority 8 7157 ELM POINT RD LANCASTER DR W ADAMS ST 11 18 67 0 0 15 56 167 Medium Priority 4 6278 MCCLAY RD HACKMAN RD KENTON DR 8 25 53 0 5 23 58 167 Medium Priority 1 6976 ALLEY 113 EOP LAWRENCE ST 4 11 27 40 0 15 70 166 Medium Priority 1 6976 LAWRENCE ST ALLEY 113 N BENTON AVE 4 11 27 40 0 15 70 166 Medium Priority 1 7554 STRONG DR CENTRAL DR TRANIST ST 8 21 0 60 0 15 61 165 Medium Priority 1 7554 STRONG DR CENTRAL DR TRANIST ST 8 21 0 60 0 15 61 165 Medium Priority 1 7728 BAINBRIDGE ST N SECOND ST ALLEY 259 11 18 0 40 10 30 64 163 Medium Priority Comprehensive Curb Gutter Analysis: Ward 1 Scoring

1 7728 BAINBRIDGE ST N SECOND ST ALLEY 259 11 18 0 40 10 30 64 163 Medium Priority 8 4619 ELM ST HIGHWAY 370 ELM ST OFF 8 25 40 20 0 0 71 163 Medium Priority 8 5162 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 36 27 20 0 15 58 163 Medium Priority 8 5163 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E NEW TOWN BLVD 8 36 27 20 0 15 58 163 Medium Priority 8 5163 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E NEW TOWN BLVD 8 36 27 20 0 15 58 163 Medium Priority 8 5163 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E NEW TOWN BLVD 8 36 27 20 0 15 58 163 Medium Priority 1 7009 MONTGOMERY ST ALLEY 69 N FOURTH ST 11 14 27 20 5 23 67 162 Medium Priority 1 4756 ALLEY 18 WILKINSON ST HOWARD ST 4 25 0 50 5 23 60 162 Medium Priority 1 7010 ALLEY 69 LAWRENCE ST MONTGOMERY ST 15 11 27 20 5 23 66 161 Medium Priority 1 7010 MONTGOMERY ST ALLEY 69 N FOURTH ST 15 11 27 20 5 23 66 161 Medium Priority 8 7776 BOSCHERTOWN RD PATHFINDER TRL FOX HILL RD 8 43 27 30 0 0 54 161 Medium Priority 4 7765 DIEKAMP LN EOP DIEKAMP LN 8 14 53 20 0 15 51 161 Medium Priority 4 7765 DIEKAMP LN EOP DIEKAMP LN 8 14 53 20 0 15 51 161 Medium Priority 8 5166 FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES PKWY E NEW TOWN BLVD 15 29 27 20 0 15 55 161 Medium Priority 8 5166 FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALFOUNTAIN DR LAKES PKWY E NEW TOWN BLVD 15 29 27 20 0 15 55 161 Medium Priority 1 7022 ALLEY 14 BAYARD ST LAWRENCE ST 15 18 0 40 0 15 73 160 Medium Priority 1 7022 BAYARD ST N SECOND ST ALLEY 15 15 18 0 40 0 15 73 160 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 70 159 Medium Priority 8 4261 ELM ST MILLSTONE CORPORATE DR ELM POINT INDUSTRIAL DR 8 21 40 20 0 0 70 159 Medium Priority 4 6278 MCCLAY RD HACKMAN RD KENTON DR 8 25 53 0 5 23 50 158 Medium Priority 4 6422 DIEKAMP LN DIEKAMP LN OLD HIGHWAY 94 S 15 21 53 10 0 15 43 157 Medium Priority 1 7009 ALLEY 69 LAWRENCE ST MONTGOMERY ST 11 11 27 20 5 23 66 157 Medium Priority 1 7067 WILKINSON ST N THIRD ST ALLEY 33 15 21 0 40 0 15 65 157 Medium Priority 1 4756 HOWARD ST EOP ALLEY 18 4 21 0 50 5 23 59 157 Medium Priority 2 4895 BOONE AVE NATHAN AVE NATHAN AVE 19 14 53 0 5 23 46 155 Medium Priority 8 5162 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 36 27 20 0 15 49 154 Medium Priority 8 5162 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 36 27 20 0 15 49 154 Medium Priority 8 5162 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 36 27 20 0 15 49 154 Medium Priority 8 5162 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 36 27 20 0 15 49 154 Medium Priority 8 5162 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 36 27 20 0 15 49 154 Medium Priority 8 5162 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 36 27 20 0 15 49 154 Medium Priority 8 5162 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD HUSTER RD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 36 27 20 0 15 49 154 Medium Priority 8 5163 FOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E NEW TOWN BLVD 8 36 27 20 0 15 49 154 Medium Priority 1 6974 N BENTON AVE LAWRENCE ST MORGAN ST 15 18 27 20 5 23 52 154 Medium Priority 4 6423 DIEKAMP LN EOP DIEKAMP LN 11 21 53 10 0 15 43 154 Medium Priority 4 6423 DIEKAMP LN EOP DIEKAMP LN 11 21 53 10 0 15 43 154 Medium Priority 8 5165 FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALEOP DR FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 29 27 20 0 15 55 153 Medium Priority 8 5165 FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALEOP DR FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 29 27 20 0 15 55 153 Medium Priority 8 5165 FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALEOP DR FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 29 27 20 0 15 55 153 Medium Priority 8 5165 FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALEOP DR FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 29 27 20 0 15 55 153 Medium Priority 4 7765 DIEKAMP LN EOP DIEKAMP LN 8 14 53 20 0 15 42 152 Medium Priority 1 7014 ALLEY 69 LAWRENCE ST MONTGOMERY ST 4 4 27 30 5 23 66 152 Medium Priority 1 7060 ALLEY 32 HOWARD ST OLIVE ST 15 18 0 40 0 15 64 152 Medium Priority 1 7059 ALLEY 32 HOWARD ST OLIVE ST 15 18 0 40 0 15 64 152 Medium Priority 1 7068 ALLEY 33 BAINBRIDGE ST WILKINSON ST 15 18 0 40 0 15 64 152 Medium Priority 1 7068 WILKINSON ST N THIRD ST ALLEY 33 15 18 0 40 0 15 64 152 Medium Priority 1 7040 ALLEY 16 WOOD ST RANDOLPH ST 15 11 0 40 0 15 70 151 Medium Priority 1 7729 WILKINSON ST N SECOND ST ALLEY 259 8 21 0 40 0 15 65 149 Low Priority 1 7015 ALLEY 69 LAWRENCE ST MONTGOMERY ST 0 4 27 30 5 23 66 149 Low Priority 1 7014 ALLEY 70 BAYARD ST LAWRENCE ST 4 0 27 30 5 23 65 148 Low Priority 2 4895 BOONE AVE NATHAN AVE NATHAN AVE 19 14 53 0 5 23 38 147 Low Priority 8 5165 FOUNTAIN LAKES INDUSTRIALEOP DR FOUNTAIN LAKES PKWY E 8 29 27 20 0 15 47 145 Low Priority 1 7051 ALLEY 17 FRENCH ST WOOD ST 8 18 0 40 0 15 64 145 Low Priority 1 7051 FRENCH ST N SECOND ST ALLEY 17 8 18 0 40 0 15 64 145 Low Priority 1 7729 ALLEY 18 WILKINSON ST HOWARD ST 8 18 0 40 0 15 64 145 Low Priority 4 4596 ZUMBEHL RD HAWKS NEST DR OLD HIGHWAY 94 S 8 21 27 20 5 8 61 144 Low Priority 4 4596 ZUMBEHL RD HAWKS NEST DR OLD HIGHWAY 94 S 8 21 27 20 5 8 61 144 Low Priority 1 7015 ALLEY 70 BAYARD ST LAWRENCE ST 0 0 27 30 5 23 65 144 Low Priority 8 12353 W RANDOLPH ST STREET END W RANDOLPH ST 8 14 27 40 0 15 38 142 Low Priority Comprehensive Curb Gutter Analysis: Ward 1 Scoring

6 5907 CEDARBROOK DR WEST CLAY ST WEST CLAY ST 8 25 27 0 10 15 67 141 Low Priority 2 4860 SCHAEFER SCHAEFER S SIXTH ST 19 11 27 20 10 30 33 139 Low Priority 2 4859 SCHAEFER S EIGHTH ST S SIXTH ST 19 11 27 20 10 30 33 139 Low Priority 1 5251 BOSCHERTOWN RD FOX HILL RD MUELLER RD 8 32 27 20 0 0 48 135 Low Priority 1 5251 BOSCHERTOWN RD FOX HILL RD MUELLER RD 8 21 40 0 10 30 32 131 Low Priority 6 5907 CEDARBROOK DR WEST CLAY ST WEST CLAY ST 8 25 27 0 10 15 50 124 Low Priority 6 5907 CEDARBROOK DR WEST CLAY ST WEST CLAY ST 8 25 27 0 10 15 50 124 Low Priority 8 5170 SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR STREET END SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR 8 25 13 20 5 23 21 109 Low Priority 8 5170 SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR STREET END SKINNER INDUSTRIAL DR 8 25 13 20 5 23 21 109 Low Priority Scoring Template Data Input Input Score Category Weight

< 15 0 Width of Street (ft) = 15 - 20 5 > 20 10 Yes Y 10 Extra Parking No N 0

Parking Yes Y 10 Parking Control No N 0

Yes Y 10 No Parking Zone No N 0 3 Yes Y 0 Exisiting MSE Wall No N 10 Yes Y 0 MSE Wall Required Possibly P 5 No N 10 Yes Y 10 Existing Sidewalk No N 0 Poor P 10 If Yes, Sidewalk Condition Moderate M 5 Great G 0 Yes Y 0 ADA Improvements Required No N

Constructability Constructability 10 < 10 0 Setback Distance = 10 - 20 5 > 20 10 Poor P 0 Pavement Condition Moderate M 5 Great G 10 Other Comment Section 5 Residential R 10 Zoning Commercial C 0 = 00 Master Plan = 1-2 5 > Planning 210 Public Pu 10 Owner Private Pr 0 8

< 20 # of Existing Structures = 2 - 4 5 > 410 Yes Y 0 Sump Area No N 10 Yes Y Drainage 0 Excessive Drainage No N 10 Yes Y 10 Ponding Area No N 0 8 Minor Mi 10 Functional Classification Major Ma 0 Low L 0 Water Quality Potential Medium M 5 Engineering High H 10 3 < 210 # of Utility Impacts = 2 - 4 5 > 40 < 210 # of Miscellaneous Impacts = 2 - 4 5 > 40 Small S 10

Cost Necessary ROW Moderate M 5 Large L 0 < 200 10 Length of 'No Curb' Section (ft) = 200 - 600 5 > 600 0 Avg. Drainage Score = determined above Avg. Constructability Score = determined above 10 < 150 Low Priority

Difficulty Rating Evaluation = 175 Medium Priority Total > 185 High Priority Curb and Gutter Program Overall Map

U S H

B I U G

E H H W E A S T T Y D N V T S S B L L B S L N BETHMAN RD A N E R N P E R W N W I A M A T O H T A C T S H O W C I E W R N N A L M A K S T E D D R M R U N BLVD E W IN LAKES L TO 8 FOUNTA L R E E EL R H M C W S R T S 370 T D S O AY O E B HW FF U IG H R H IG F

D H H WA N O APRICOT DR A R S Y 0 E 3 X 37 Y A 70 L Y F R K W H WA L HAW O I R N H E E E L ING IG R H RD T

T N H H L N M A D N RD I S L W R T 4 D IN A R E O L D U P 9 K L D T R ELM T H H L O Y C T IG D I D L D P H R V A D R R A D W E R W INT R R R R O D R A D R P H E D D I Y M N D EL N E V E S 3 G D L K L G 7 I V R R B R L 0 I O I E H D D D E R E H W N E V K R L K E A L L N E I N O D O E

A 1 C N I S Y E I R C W

D H D S T A D N W C T I M H S T Y D S R N R H I E T E S ON S P N R RT A A R O V X O W H R I U S W Y 7 A M E A

W S A S A T D T E S R S N

T D T H L T R ME D S E A N LY N E

N O I Y N D A R N S A D T T

M E B M

L H R D S D H R H S E R L S O N P IP W V R G T S E D W D S A L N R I IC E P R F H T L B L S A K I L N S H U N E E E L E N N M T X 10 R A O G 6 L D D L S A N E M P H T F D R N S E S R V A R A E N N

N D S S R R F L T H M O R O A R T W K F N IC D A R N D Y A P E L L W E A V N H M S N C C N T R S V E H U O R S L S N E E T T WE R H I A ST E O C B S ME CL V D XICO RD AY A N U L R N S T T E R D D Y K E K T L A O S F A Y S N I 70 S S E R H O O S T T H E T T C C V E T X E N I F E R D R 9 I T S S S F A R E D R B T N U A JE N N L PL N C FIR FF C A S H T S ER Y Z M C AR OM T C SO TR A E H A P AP N N W M A N E KIN IT ST U Z A O R N V S OL O U Y W S A S D R C R T T R E D M IA O PE G L M O M R R B Y L R T ID D D A Y R E N E P S S E R K S H T MB R E H N Y W T O I N L E G SA N T D B Y G I W R R IN E E R S A O T G D D O D N N D M ID U O R N S M U R S R K U R C R S E D D E R V G 4 R R D L R N D I G D D N S R L T D E U E S O D Y S

E S N R L O 2 R C N A O R R H D N Y O R F I T I O E G 7 T G R E F 0 A L V I W S R I B L R Y IC N E E I F A E N L E L D B A R O A S D M E V F H G A D A T N N R R C A S 5 S O D K S F R M 94 D A AY P T A HW IG R S D N H P I LD O A R O V R R L R D L S T O E E I 94 W IV Y R M A E L R A W N GH S S R HI T EAU LN R LE B L D N S SER H R VICE RD ON E Y M W K E S 364 P WAY A 3 A HIGH H T N Legend I H E G R H R A W D A Y High Priority Y W 3 K 6 P 4 A N W E Medium Priority D R R R A IVE S R Low Priority