DOCSLIB.ORG

The Bonham Site Analysis Retains the Lan- Guage and Commentary of the 1992 Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Research Report Series No. 16 2005 Virginia Department of Historic Resources 280 1 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA 2322 1 Virginia Department of Hitoric Resources Research Report Serier No. I6 AUTHORS: C. Clifford Boyd, Jr. Donna C. Boyd Michael B. Barber Paul S. Gardner The initial draft of this report was submitted to the Virginia Department of Historic Resources in 1992. Over the past decade, a great deal has been learned about Late Wood- land cultures across Virginia due, for the most part, to federal and state-funded cultural resource management surveys and excavations. New analysis methods and interpretations have also enhanced our knowledge about the past since 1992. For example, the standards for the analysis of human skeletal remains, which are now standard operating procedure for Dr. Donna Boyd and myself (Buikstra and Ubelaker 1994), were not written and published until 1994. For the most part, this published version of the Bonham site analysis retains the lan- guage and commentary of the 1992 draft. Some revisions and additions have been made, especially in terms of radiocarbon dates and their calibration. So, this document should be read and interpreted largely in light of what was state-of-the-art knowledge about the Late Woodland cultures of Southwest Virginia in 1992. Cliff Boyd January 2003 The Bonham site (44SM7), a Late Woodland village complex located along the Middle Fork of the Holston River in Smyth County, Virginia, was tested and excavated in 1989 and 1990. The Virginia Department of Historic Resources, other state and federal enti- ties, and volunteers from the Archeological Society of Virginia provided support for this research. The 1989 test trenches uncovered 25 Native American features (including five with human remains) and evidence that at least two major village sites overlapped in the 44SM7 area. Some of the site area was protected from impending industrial development by a cap of fill dirt; however, the unprotected area of one site was subjected to salvage excavations in 1990. The main goal of these excavations was to uncover and remove any human remains from burials before they were destroyed. As a result, 25 refuse-filled fea- tures, three postmolds and 26 burial pits were partially or completely excavated. The site plan showed several palisade lines and features and burials generally clustered along the palisades. The recovered lithic and ceramic artifacts, as well as the human remains, verte- brate faunal remains, and samples of carbonized plant remains were analyzed. The predominant lithic raw materials used for producing stone tools were chert and chalce- dony, and most of the projectile points were small triangular arrow tips common on most Late Woodland sites. Ceramics were predominantly grit, limestone, or gastropod shell- tempered with knotted net impressed surfaces. Some decorations on rim sherds suggested contact with Mississippian groups to the south. The remains of 35 individuals were ana- lyzed; all major age and sex groups were represented in the human remains. Many of the individuals showed high incidences of nutritional, traumatic, or degenerative pathologies. Faunal utilization focused predominately on white-tailed deer and botanical remains sug- gested a mixed economy, with corn, beans, squash, and tobacco being the important domesticated plants. Even though looting extensively disturbed the Bonham site, the site is significant in the wealth of information it still preserves about Late Woodland peoples of Southwest Virginia. Editor? Note ....................................................................................................................ii ... Abstract ..........................................................................................................................111 Contents .........................................................................................................................iv Figures ............................................................................................................................. v Tables............................................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgments ......................... ............................................................................... vii 1: 44SM7: The Site and Its Environment ............................................................................1 2 Analysis Methods ............................................................................................................5 3: Context and Feature Descriptions .................................................................................11 4: Skeletal Analysis of Prehistoric Human Remains ...........................................................33 Donna C. Boyd 5: Lithic Artifact Analysis .................................................................................................. 45 6: Ceramic Artifact Analysis .............................................................................................. 53 7: Analysis of Vertebrate Faunal Remains and Bone and Shell Artifacts .............................. 65 Michael B. Barber 8: Carbonized Plant Remains ............................................................................................ 77 Paul S. Gardner 9: Summary and Recommendations .................................................................................. 87 10: References Cited ........................................................................................................... 89 Appendix A: Inventory of Human Skeletal Remains Donna C. Boyd Appendix B: Inventory of Ceramic Artifacts Section of U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute Chilhowie quadrangle showing the location of 44SM7 ................................................................... 2 Originally defined boundary of 44SM7 showing the 1989 trenches and the 1990 excavation area ............................................................. 3 West trench.. Trench 1 .................................................................................................... 7 East trench.. Trench 2 .....................................................................................................8 View of East trench showing Feature 2A in foreground ...................................................9 General view of the site with people excavating features ...................................................9 1990 site plan ................................................................................................................12 Map 1: 1990 excavations ............................................................................................... 13 Map 2: 1990 excavations ...............................................................................................14 Map 3: 1990 excavations ............................................................................................... 15 Map 4: 1990 excavations ............................................................................................... 16 Map 5: 1990 excavations ............................................................................................... 17 Map 6: 1990 excavations ...............................................................................................18 Map 7: 1990 excavations ............................................................................................... 19 Map 8: 1990 excavations ............................................................................................... 20 Feature 1E .....................................................................................................................21 Feature 11 ......................................................................................................................23 Features 1L and 1M ...................................................................................................... 23 Feature 1N .................................................................................................................... 23 Feature 2G .................................................................................................................... 24 Feature 10A .................................................................................................................. 26 Feature 11A .............................................................................................................. 26 Feature 1 lC .................................................................................................................. 27 Features 13F and 13G ...................................................................................................28 Feature 2 1A .................................................................................................................. 29 Feature 22F ................................................................................................................... 31 Feature 23C .................................................................................................................. 31 Feature 27A ..................................................................................................................32 Vertebral osteoarthritis ..................................................................................................39 Arthritic deterioration of the right knee .........................................................................40 Bone loss and arthritis to arms of individual 1 1E ..........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley

    Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1977 Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley Ann L. Magennis University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Magennis, Ann L., "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1977. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1340 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L. Magennis entitled "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Fred H. Smith, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: William M. Bass, Richard L. Jantz, Charles H. Faulkner Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L.
  • Bipolar Technology and Pebble Stone Artifacts

    Bipolar Technology and Pebble Stone Artifacts

    Bipolar Technology and Pebble Stone Artifacts: Experimentation in Stone Tool Manufacture A thesis submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department ofAnthropology and Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan By Bruce David Low Fall 1997 ( Copyright Bruce David Low, 1997. All rights reserved.) PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereoffor financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head ofthe Department ofAnthropology and Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (S7N 2AS) i ABSTRACT There is a general lack of research concerning the technological aspect of pebble stone artifacts throughout the Northern Plains.
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia

    2016 Athens, Georgia

    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
  • History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland

    History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland

    Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ History, Monumentality, And Interaction In The Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland By: Alice P. Wright Abstract The Middle Woodland period in eastern North America witnessed a florescence of monumental architecture and material exchange linked to widespread networks of ritual interaction. Although these networks encompassed large geographic areas and persisted for several centuries, extant archaeological models have tended to characterize Middle Woodland interaction as an historically unitary process. Using new data from the Garden Creek site in North Carolina, I argue that these frameworks obscure important historical shifts in Middle Woodland interaction. Recent collections-based research, geophysical survey, targeted excavation, and 14C dating (including Bayesian modeling) of this site reveal two coeval diachronic changes: a shift from geometric earthwork construction to platform mound construction; and a shift from the production of special artifacts (mica, crystal quartz) to the consumption of exotic artifacts in association with platform mound ceremonialism. These data hint at important changes in interregional relationships between the Appalachian Summit, the Hopewellian Midwest, and the greater Southeast during the Middle Woodland period, and provide a springboard for considering how processes of culture contact contributed to precolumbian cultural change. Wright, A. (2014). History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland. American Antiquity, 79(2), 277-294. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.79.2.277. Publisher version of record available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/history-monumentality-and- interaction-in-the-appalachian-summit-middle-woodland/8A6ABDE3030E29F367568A0F24692AD9 HISTORY, MONUMENTALITY, AND INTERACTION IN THE APPALACHIAN SUMMIT MIDDLE WOODLAND Alice P.
  • Bladelet Polish: a Lithic Analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an Upland Hopewell Campsite

    Bladelet Polish: a Lithic Analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an Upland Hopewell Campsite

    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 5-19-2018 Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite Tyler R. E. Heneghan Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Heneghan, Tyler R. E., "Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 928. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/928 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R. E. HENEGHAN 107 Pages This thesis builds upon recent investigations at Spracklen (33GR1585), a small upland site in Greene County, Ohio. The presence of non-local cherts, bladelets, and bladelet cores indicates a Middle Woodland Ohio Hopewell occupation. Raw material sourcing, debitage analyses, and a use-wear analysis uncovered that Spracklen functioned as a logistical hunting campsite. Its people utilized bladelets for butchery and hide-working processes. This information provides new insights into Hopewellian life in the uplands and its place within Hopewell community organization. KEYWORDS: Settlement patterns, Hopewell, Bladelets, Use-wear, GIS BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R.
  • Pukaskwa Pits: Rethinking the Vision Quest Hypothesis

    Pukaskwa Pits: Rethinking the Vision Quest Hypothesis

    PUKASKWA PITS: RETHINKING THE VISION QUEST HYPOTHESIS A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada Copyright by Nancy Denise Champagne 2009 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program September 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-53244-7 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-53244-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-Historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation

    Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-Historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation

    1 Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation William Bruce 2010 Rhodes Institute for Regional Studies 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………3 a. Site location……………………………………………………………………………..…4 II. Environmental setting………………………………………………………………………….5 a. Physiogrpahy and Geology ……………………………………………………………….5 b. Climate……………………………………………………………………………………..8 c. Flora and Fauna ………………………………………………………………………….11 III. Research Design and Methods………………………………………………………………...12 a. Ceramic Analysis…………………………………………………………………12 b. Lithic Analysis………………………………………………………..…………..17 IV. Results of testing Holcombe II and Holcombe III……………………………………………22 a. Previous Archaeological Investigations………………………………………………….22 b. Holcombe II………………………………………………………………………………..23 a. Shovel Tests………………………………………………………………………23 b. Formal Excavation………………………………………………………………25 c. Holcombe III………………………………………………………………………………61 a. Shovel Tests………………………………………………………………………61 b. Formal Excavation………………………………………………………………62 d. Results……………………………………………………………………………………...63 a. Features…………………………………………………………………………..63 b. Artifact Assemblage……………………………………………………………..64 1. Ceramic Analysis………………………………………………………64 a. Paste Characteristics…………………………………………65 b. Surface Decoration…………………………………………...67 c. Discussion……………………………………………………..71 2. Lithic Analysis ………………………………………………………...72 V. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………….80 VI. Future Excavations……………………………………………………………………………81 VII. References cited ………………………………………………………………………………82
  • Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition

    Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition

    Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition Submitted to the Minnesota Department of Transportation Submitted by Constance Arzigian Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse July 2008 MINNESOTA STATEWIDE MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM FOR THE WOODLAND TRADITION FINAL Mn/DOT Agreement No. 89964 MVAC Report No. 735 Authorized and Sponsored by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Submitted by Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 1725 State Street La Crosse WI 54601 Principal Investigator and Report Author Constance Arzigian July 2008 NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) (Expires 1-31-2009) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. __X_ New Submission ____ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Woodland Tradition in Minnesota B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Brainerd Complex: Early Woodland in Central and Northern Minnesota, 1000 B.C.–A.D. 400 The Southeast Minnesota Early Woodland Complex, 500–200 B.C. The Havana-Related Complex: Middle Woodland in Central and Eastern Minnesota, 200 B.C.–A.D.
  • Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common

    Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common

    Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common Name(s) Lab # B.P. S.D. Reference # TNDATE Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave AA-15810 260 50 161:57 0001 Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave Beta-103531 380 50 162:52 0002 Protected 1 2nd Unnamed Cave AA-15811 970 60 162:52 0003 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5067 4350 60 162:52; 163:669 0004 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5064 3115 65 162:52; 163:669 0005 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96624 3060 50 162:52; 163:669 0006 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114172 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0007 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114173 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0008 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5066 2950 65 162:52; 163:669 0009 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96623 2950 110 162:52; 163:669 0010 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5063 2805 75 162:52; 163:669 0011 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5065 2745 75 162:52; 163:669 0012 Protected 1 5th Unnamed Cave Beta-106695 2030 50 162:52 0013 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-109675 1890 50 162:52 0014 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-106697 630 50 162:52 0015 Protected 1 7th Unnamed Cave Beta-106698 1320 40 162:52 0016 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13937 1030 90 160:149 0017 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13938 620 150 160:149 0018 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126032 750 60 160:149 0019 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126033 680 60 160:149 0020 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-131221 560 60 160:149 0021 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta 134981 780 40 160:149 0022 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-134982 890 60 160:149 0023
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced

    INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aity type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quali^ of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and in^oper alignment can adverse^ affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photogr^hs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher qualiQr 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for aiqr photographs or illustrations gqxpearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313.'761-4700 800/521-0600 SHENKS FERRY SUBSISTENCE AND SETTLEMENT: THE ARCHAEOBOTANICAL RECORD DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U niversity by Annette Gabrielle Ericksen, B.A., M.A.
  • A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice Within a Mississippian Settlement

    A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice Within a Mississippian Settlement

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2017 A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice within a Mississippian Settlement Jessie Luella Johanson University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Johanson, Jessie Luella, "A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice within a Mississippian Settlement. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4630 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jessie Luella Johanson entitled "A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice within a Mississippian Settlement." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace D. Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: David G. Anderson, Barbara J. Heath, Sally P. Horn Accepted for the Council: Dixie L.
  • North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication 14

    North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication 14

    ADDENDUM I: A GUIDE TO RESEARCH PAPERS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTH CAROLINA ON FILE WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGY BRANCH OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Thomas H. Hargrove Compiler NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL PUBLICATION NUl{BER 14 Published Jointly by the North Carolina Archaeological Council and the Archaeology Branch Division of Archives and History North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources Raleigh, 1981 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 AUTHOR INDEX 3 INDEX 65 CONTRIBUTING INSTITUTIONS 71 ii Introduction In 1980 the North Carolina Archaeological Council published a bibliography of archaeological papers on file with one of its member institutions. Appearing as Publication 13 in the Council Series, "A guide to research papers in the archaeology of North Carolina on file with the Archaeology Branch of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History" provided a list of 661 works to those involved with archaeological research or resource management. Most of these works, which cover archaeological projects throughout the state, were unpublished. Since the publication of that bibliography, the Archaeology Branch's file of dissertations, theses, articles, and contract reports on archaeology has grown. In addition, many of the major sources of published archaeological works in North Carolina have been indexed for use in environmental review at the branch. As a result, the number of additional references has led to the compilation of a second bibliography. As in the first bibliography, the works l1sted here represent a wide variety of research interests, techniques, formats, and purposes. The geographical focus varies from excavations of single structures or surveys of one-acre plots of land to overviews of physiographic regions that include one-third of the state.