DOCSLIB.ORG

North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication 14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ADDENDUM I: A GUIDE TO RESEARCH PAPERS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTH CAROLINA ON FILE WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGY BRANCH OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Thomas H. Hargrove Compiler NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL PUBLICATION NUl{BER 14 Published Jointly by the North Carolina Archaeological Council and the Archaeology Branch Division of Archives and History North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources Raleigh, 1981 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 AUTHOR INDEX 3 INDEX 65 CONTRIBUTING INSTITUTIONS 71 ii Introduction In 1980 the North Carolina Archaeological Council published a bibliography of archaeological papers on file with one of its member institutions. Appearing as Publication 13 in the Council Series, "A guide to research papers in the archaeology of North Carolina on file with the Archaeology Branch of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History" provided a list of 661 works to those involved with archaeological research or resource management. Most of these works, which cover archaeological projects throughout the state, were unpublished. Since the publication of that bibliography, the Archaeology Branch's file of dissertations, theses, articles, and contract reports on archaeology has grown. In addition, many of the major sources of published archaeological works in North Carolina have been indexed for use in environmental review at the branch. As a result, the number of additional references has led to the compilation of a second bibliography. As in the first bibliography, the works l1sted here represent a wide variety of research interests, techniques, formats, and purposes. The geographical focus varies from excavations of single structures or surveys of one-acre plots of land to overviews of physiographic regions that include one-third of the state. The scale of reporting ranges from brief reports used to clear small earth-moving projects with an absence of archeological sites to short articles in archaeological and historical society newsletters to reports of large-scale river basin surveys and major excavations, Ph.D. dissertations, master's theses, and published works with wide distribution. 2 In each citation the compiler has attempted to include the name of the institution or agency that performed the work described in the report. When a performing agency is not listed in the report, the sponsoring or contracting agency (if known) is listed in its place. This reference is intended to supply the researcher with the information needed to contact directly the individuals or the institutions that have on file not only the manuscript cited, but also (presumably) the notes, photographs, and artifacts produced by the project in question. In most cases a researcher interested in past work in a particular area will not need to refer to the Archaeology Branch files. This bibliography uses the format prescribed by American Antiquity (Style Guide for American Antiquity 1979). The body of the list has been arranged alphabetically by the first author listed in the report, or by principal inves­ tigator or sponsoring institution if no author was listed on the Archaeology Branch copy. An index of works arranged by county or region (when the entry deals with several counties) follows the author index. The numbers listed next to each county or region refer to the numbers found to the right of each title in the author index. Style variants such as the spellings of archeology and archaeology have been maintained. To prevent redundancy, the addresses of most of the contributing organizations have been abbreviated in individual entries. A list of these organizations appears in the appendix. ';here report titles do not mention the North Carolina counties (or regions) involved, county names or regions have been added in brackets. Author Index Adams, William Hampton, Robin L. Johnson, and David Ferguson Barton 1979 Archaeological investigations of Ebenezer 662 Log Church and vicinity. [Chatham County]. Ms. on file, Soil Systems, Inc., Bloomington, Indiana. Ambrose, Ronald J. 1979 Archaeological survey of land Froposed for 663 use as logging platform near North Fork of Catawba River, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest [McDowell County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Archaeological survey of two proposed parking 664 lots in compartments 302 and 307, Chestnut Mountain quad, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest [Burke County]. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource assessment of the proposed 665 construction of a parking lot on Mortimer­ Piedmont Road, compartment 96, Chestnut Mountain quad, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest, Burke County, North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 4 Ambrose, Ronald J. (Continued) 1979 Cultural resource assessment of the proposed con­ 666 struction of parking lots at the wilderness camp­ ground on Cold Mountain Road, compartment 97, Chestnut 110untain quad, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest, Burke County, North Carolina. Ms. of file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource assessment of the proposed Sally f:fJ7 Creek system road, Grandfather Ranger District, com­ partments 55, 56, 57, 58, Pisgah National Forest, Caldwell County, North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource assessment of the proposed system 668 road in compartment 302, Lower Steels Creek, Grand­ father Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest [Burke County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource assessment of the proposed temporary f:fJ9 road near Swannanoa Creek, Grandfather Ranger District, compartment 204, Mackey Mountain quad [McDowell County) , North Carolina. Ms. of file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource survey of compartment 254, Bee Branch, 670 Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest [McDowell County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource survey of compartment 257, Toms 671 Creek, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest [McDowell County] , North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource survey of compartment 265, Twin 672 Branch, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest IMcDowell County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource survey of compartment 264, Woodlawn, 673 Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest, [McDowell County] , North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1979 Cultural resource survey of compartment 269, North 674 Fork Catawba River, Grandfather Ranger station, Pisgah National Forest IMcDowell County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 5 Ambrose, Ronald J. (Continued) 1980 Cultural resource assessment of "proposed Jackson 675 County landfill," Jackson County, North Carolina, Highlands Ranger District, Nantaha1a National Forest. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1980 Cultural resource survey of area proposed for use 676 as a log landing site in compartment 241, Beerock, Pisgah National Forest, McDowell County, North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1980 ·Cu1tura1 resource survey of compartment 288, Sandy 677 Branch, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest [Burke County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1980 Cultural resource survey of compartment 287, Shook 678 Creek, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest IBurke County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. 1980 Cultural resource survey of compartment 258, South 679 Fork Tom's Creek, Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest [McDowell County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, U.S. Forest Service, Asheville. Anthony, Ronald W., and Andrew N. Ash 1980 An environmental and cultural resources survey of the Aulander 201 facilities plan project area, Hertford and Bertie counties, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Carolina Archaeological Services, Columbia, South Carolina. 1980 An environmental and cultural resources survey of 681 the Creswell 201 facilities plan project area, Washington County, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Carolina Archaeological Services, Columbia, South Carolina. 1980 An environmental and cultural resources survey of 682 the Nashville 201 facilities plan project area, Nash County, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Carolina Archaeological Services, Columbia, South Carolina. 6 Archaeological Research Consultants, Inc. 1980 Draft final report of an archaeological resource 683 survey and significance evaluation for the phase I development area at Medoc Mountain State Park [Halifax County]. Ms. on file, Archaeolo­ gical Research Consultants, Inc., Chapel Hill. 1980 Interim report on the archaeological survey con­ 684 ducted for the phase I development, Medoc Moun­ tain State Park, Halifax County, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Archaeological Research Consultants, Inc., Chapel Hill. 1981 Final report: archaeological resource survey and 685 significance evaluation for the phase I develop­ ment area at Medoc Mountain State Park IHalifax County]. Ms. on file, Archaeological Research Consultants, Inc., Chapel Hill Archaeological Society of North Carolina 1941 Excavations at Hillsboro [Orange County]. Archaeo­ 686 logical Society of North Carolina, Newsletter 6: 3,5. 1941 Frutchey mound excavations [Montgomery County] • 687 Archaeological Society
Recommended publications
  • Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina

    Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina

    The following chapter is from: The Archaeology of North Carolina: Three Archaeological Symposia Charles R. Ewen – Co-Editor Thomas R. Whyte – Co-Editor R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr. – Co-Editor North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication Number 30 2011 Available online at: http://www.rla.unc.edu/NCAC/Publications/NCAC30/index.html CHEROKEE ETHNOGENESIS IN SOUTHWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA Christopher B. Rodning Dozens of Cherokee towns dotted the river valleys of the Appalachian Summit province in southwestern North Carolina during the eighteenth century (Figure 16-1; Dickens 1967, 1978, 1979; Perdue 1998; Persico 1979; Shumate et al. 2005; Smith 1979). What developments led to the formation of these Cherokee towns? Of course, native people had been living in the Appalachian Summit for thousands of years, through the Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi periods (Dickens 1976; Keel 1976; Purrington 1983; Ward and Davis 1999). What are the archaeological correlates of Cherokee culture, when are they visible archaeologically, and what can archaeology contribute to knowledge of the origins and development of Cherokee culture in southwestern North Carolina? Archaeologists, myself included, have often focused on the characteristics of pottery and other artifacts as clues about the development of Cherokee culture, which is a valid approach, but not the only approach (Dickens 1978, 1979, 1986; Hally 1986; Riggs and Rodning 2002; Rodning 2008; Schroedl 1986a; Wilson and Rodning 2002). In this paper (see also Rodning 2009a, 2010a, 2011b), I focus on the development of Cherokee towns and townhouses. Given the significance of towns and town affiliations to Cherokee identity and landscape during the 1700s (Boulware 2011; Chambers 2010; Smith 1979), I suggest that tracing the development of towns and townhouses helps us understand Cherokee ethnogenesis, more generally.
  • SEAC Bulletin 58.Pdf

    SEAC Bulletin 58.Pdf

    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE BULLETIN 58 SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE BULLETIN 58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 DOUBLETREE BY HILTON DOWNTOWN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE Organized by: Kevin E. Smith, Aaron Deter-Wolf, Phillip Hodge, Shannon Hodge, Sarah Levithol, Michael C. Moore, and Tanya M. Peres Hosted by: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Middle Tennessee State University Division of Archaeology, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Office of Social and Cultural Resources, Tennessee Department of Transportation iii Cover: Sellars Mississippian Ancestral Pair. Left: McClung Museum of Natural History and Culture; Right: John C. Waggoner, Jr. Photographs by David H. Dye Printing of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 58 – 2015 Funded by Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327420, 750 copies. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $4.08 per copy. October 2015. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s Policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 2nd floor, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 312 Rosa L.
  • National Register of Historic Places 2013 Pending Lists

    National Register of Historic Places 2013 Pending Lists

    National Register of Historic Places 2013 Pending Lists January 5, 2013. ............................................................................................................................................ 3 January 12, 2013. .......................................................................................................................................... 7 January 26, 2013. ........................................................................................................................................ 15 February 2, 2013. ........................................................................................................................................ 19 February 9, 2013. ........................................................................................................................................ 26 February 16, 2013. ...................................................................................................................................... 33 February 23, 2013. ...................................................................................................................................... 37 March 2, 2013. ............................................................................................................................................ 42 March 9, 2013. ............................................................................................................................................ 48 March 16, 2013. .........................................................................................................................................
  • THE MISSISSIPPIAN OCCUPATION of the SAVANNAH RIVER VALLEY Author(S): David G

    THE MISSISSIPPIAN OCCUPATION of the SAVANNAH RIVER VALLEY Author(S): David G

    THE MISSISSIPPIAN OCCUPATION OF THE SAVANNAH RIVER VALLEY Author(s): David G. Anderson, David J. Hally and James L. Rudolph Source: Southeastern Archaeology, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Summer 1986), pp. 32-51 Published by: Allen Press on behalf of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40713472 . Accessed: 02/10/2013 09:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Allen Press and Southeastern Archaeological Conference are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Southeastern Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 160.36.64.162 on Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:25:14 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE MISSISSIPPIAN OCCUPATION OF THE SAVANNAH RIVER VALLEY David G. Anderson chronologicaland culturalsequence forthe period David J.Hally along much of the drainage;(b) the publicationof and major surveyand excavationreports from several areas of the workat several L. basin, including major James Rudolph moundand village sites; (c) the linkageof ethnoh- istoricand archaeologicalsite records;and (d) the initiationof diachronicanalyses encompassing both drainage-specificand regional political evolution, 1970, in the Before knowledgeof Mississippian occupations subsistencetrends, mortuary practices, and settle- SavannahRiver came isolated, re- Valley from oftenbrief mentpatterning.
  • Local Historic Landmark Designations

    Local Historic Landmark Designations

    Item No: AIR - 0080 Staff Responsible: Lisa McCarter Agenda Date: 10 Nov 2015 Prepared For: RE: DESCRIPTION Local Historic Landmark Designations MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FROM: LISA MCCARTER, PLANNER II SUBJECT: LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATIONS DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2015 CC: MELODY SHULER, WARREN WOOD Request: BOC consideration to vote on the commencement of local historic landmark designation reports for four town owned structures: Duncan McDonald House (115 McDonald Street), Niven‐Price Mercantile Building (216 W. North Main Street), The Meeting Place (209 W. South Main Street) and the Waxhaw Water Tank (113 McDonald Street). Benefits of Local Landmark Designation: Local Historic Designation of structures provides economic benefits, tourism and placemaking benefits, and community‐building benefits. The Town of Waxhaw wishes to preserve the unique character of Waxhaw for generations to come—including its historic buildings. Historic buildings are integral to an excellent Waxhaw visitor experience. Historic structures that are aesthetically cohesive and well promoted can be a community’s most important attraction and reinforce Waxhaw’s unique sense of place. The retention of our historic structures is a way to attract tourist dollars that contribute to the local economy. Waxhaw Local Landmarks: There are currently three designated local historic landmarks in Waxhaw. These are the Waxhaw Woman’s Club (200 E. South Main Street), the Cockinos Building/Antique Mart (portion of the 100 block of W. South Main Street), and the downtown overhead pedestrian bridge over the CSX railroad line. Local Landmark Designation vs. National Historic Registry Listing: National Historic Registry listings are mostly honorary and do not impose any restrictions that prevent private property owners from making changes to their buildings or demolishing them.
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C

    Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C

    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.

  • Scenic and Historic Illinois

    917.73 BBls SCENIC AND== HISTORIC ILLINOIS With Abraham lincoln Sites and Monuments Black Hawk War Sites ! MADISON. WISCONSIN 5 1928 T»- ¥>it-. .5^.., WHm AUNOIS HISTORICAL SIISYIT 5 )cenic and Historic Illinois uic le to One TKousand Features of Scenic, Historic I and Curious Interest in Illinois w^itn ADraKam Lincoln Sites and Monuments Black Hawk War Sites Arranged by Cities and Villages CHARLES E. BROWN AutKor, Scenic and Historic Wisconsin Editor, TKe Wisconsin ArcKeologist The MusKroom Book First Edition Published by C. E. BROWN 201 1 CKadbourne Avenue Madison, Wisconsin Copyrighted, 1928 t' FOREWORD This booklet is issued with the expectation that prove of ready reference service to those who motor in Illinois. Detailed information of the Ian monuments, etc. listed may be obtained from th' cations of the Illinois Department of Conse Illinois State Historical Society, State Geological Chicago Association of Commerce, Chicago H. Society, Springfield Chamber of Commerce, an local sources. Tourists and other visitors are requested to re that all of the landmarks and monuments mentior many others not included in this publication, are lie heritage and under the protection of the state the citizens of the localities in which they occ the Indian mounds some are permanently pr' The preservation of others is encouraged. Tl ploration, when desirable, should be undertaken ganizations and institutions interested in and i equipped for such investigations. Too great a the States' archaeological history and to educat already resulted from the digging* in such an Indian landmarks by relic hunters. The mutile scenic and historic monuments all persons shoul in preventing.
  • 1992 Program + Abstracts

    1992 Program + Abstracts

    The J'J'l!. Annual Midwest Archaeological Conference 1 1 ' ll\T ii~,, !,II !ffll}II II I ~\: ._~ •,.i.~.. \\\•~\,'V · ''f••r·.ot!J>,. 1'1.~•~'l'rl!nfil . ~rt~~ J1;1r:1ri WA i1. '1~;111.-U!!•ac~~ 1.!\ ill: 11111m I! nIn 11n11 !IIIIIIII Jill!! lTiili 11 HJIIJJll llIITl nmmmlllll Illlilll 1IT1Hllll .... --·---------- PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS October 16-18, 1992 Grand Rapids, Michigan F Con£eren ·, MAC 1992 Midwest Archaeological Conference 37!!! Annual Meeting October 16-18, 1992 Grand Rapids, Michigan Sponsored By: The Grand Valley State University Department of Anthropology and Sociology The Public Museum of Grand Rapids CONFERENCE ORGANIZING C0MMITIEE Janet BrashlerElizabeth ComellFred Vedders Mark TuckerPam BillerJaret Beane Brian KwapilJack Koopmans The Department of Anthropology and Sociology gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following organizations for their assistance in planning the 1992 Midwest Archaeological Conference: The Grand Valley State University Conference Planning Office The Office of the President, Grand Valley State University The Anthropology Student Organization The Public Museum of Grand Rapids Cover Rlustration: Design from Norton Zoned Dentate Pot, Mound C, Norton Mounds 8f(!r/!lA_. ARCHIVES ;z.g-'F' Office of the State Archaeologist The Universi~i of Iowa ~ TlA<-, Geuetftf 1'l!M&rmation \"l,_ "2. Registration Registration is located on the second floor of the L.V. Eberhard Center at the Conference Services office. It will be staffed from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Friday, Oct. 16; 7:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, Oct. 17; and from 7:30 a.m.
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River

    Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River

    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
  • The Rich Heritage African Americans North Carolina

    The Rich Heritage African Americans North Carolina

    THE RICH HERITAGE OF AFRICAN NORTH CAROLINA AMERICANS HERITAGE IN North Carolina Division of Tourism, Film and Sports Development Department of Commerce NORTH 301 N. Wilmington Street, Raleigh, NC 27601-2825 1-800-VISIT NC • 919-733-8372 www.visitnc.com CAROLINA 100,000 copies of this document were printed in the USA at a cost of $115,000 or $1.15 each. Dear Friends, North Carolina is a state rich in diversity. And it is blessed with an even richer heritage that is just waiting to be explored. Some of the most outstanding contributions to our state’s heritage are the talents and achievements of African Americans. Their legacy embraces a commitment to preserving, protecting, and building stronger communities. The North Carolina Department of Commerce and Department of Cultural Resources acknowledge I invite you to use “The Rich Heritage of African Americans in North Carolina” as a guide to explore the history the generous support of the following companies in the production of this booklet: of the African American community in our state. If you look closely, you will find that schools, churches, museums, historic sites, and other landmarks tell the powerful story of African Americans in North Carolina. Food Lion Remember that heritage is not just a thing of the past. It is created every day. And by visiting these sites, you can be part Miller Brewing Company of it. Consider this an invitation to discover and celebrate the history that is the African American community. Philip Morris U.S.A. Its presence has made – and continues to make – North Carolina a better place to be.
  • Bipolar Technology and Pebble Stone Artifacts

    Bipolar Technology and Pebble Stone Artifacts

    Bipolar Technology and Pebble Stone Artifacts: Experimentation in Stone Tool Manufacture A thesis submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department ofAnthropology and Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan By Bruce David Low Fall 1997 ( Copyright Bruce David Low, 1997. All rights reserved.) PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereoffor financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head ofthe Department ofAnthropology and Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (S7N 2AS) i ABSTRACT There is a general lack of research concerning the technological aspect of pebble stone artifacts throughout the Northern Plains.
  • Management Plan / Environmental Assessment, Atchafalaya National

    Management Plan / Environmental Assessment, Atchafalaya National

    Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Heritage National Atchafalaya COMMISSION REVIEW- October 1, 2010 Vol. II SEPTEMBER 2011 Environmental Assessment Environmental Management Plan Note: This is a low resolution file of the painting, “Hope” to show artwork and placement. Artwork will be credited to Melissa Bonin, on inside front cover. AtchafalayaAtchafalaya NationalNational HeritageHeritage AreaArea MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEPT DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2011 As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration. Front cover photo credit: Louisiana Office of Tourism NPS ABF/P77/107232 SEPTEMBER 2011 Printed on recycled paper Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Management Plan/ Environmental Assessment Volume Two 1 2 CONTENTS OF VOLUME TWO CHAPTER