DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Plan / Environmental Assessment, Atchafalaya National

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management Plan / Environmental Assessment, Atchafalaya National Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Heritage National Atchafalaya COMMISSION REVIEW- October 1, 2010 Vol. II SEPTEMBER 2011 Environmental Assessment Environmental Management Plan Note: This is a low resolution file of the painting, “Hope” to show artwork and placement. Artwork will be credited to Melissa Bonin, on inside front cover. AtchafalayaAtchafalaya NationalNational HeritageHeritage AreaArea MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEPT DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2011 As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration. Front cover photo credit: Louisiana Office of Tourism NPS ABF/P77/107232 SEPTEMBER 2011 Printed on recycled paper Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Management Plan/ Environmental Assessment Volume Two 1 2 CONTENTS OF VOLUME TWO CHAPTER FIVE: THE ALTERNATIVES, INCLUDING THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE INTRODUCTION 3 DESIRED FUTURE CONDITIONS 4 Natural Resources 4 Cultural Resources 5 Visitor Use and Experience 7 Socioeconomic Environment 7 ACTIONS COMMON TO ALL ALTERNATIVES: 8 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVES 9 ALTERNATIVE A: NO ACTION 10 ALTERNATIVE B: FOCUS ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND RELATED RECREATION 11 Description 11 Potential Key Partners 12 Related Interpretive Themes 13 ALTERNATIVE C: FOCUS ON HISTORY AND CURRENT CULTURES 14 Description 14 Potential Key Partners 15 Related Interpretive Themes 16 ALTERNATIVE D: THE HERITAGE CONNECTION—NATURE, CULTURE, HISTORY, AND RECREATION (THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE) 17 Description 17 Potential Key Partners 19 Related Interpretive Themes 19 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 21 CHAPTER SIX: THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT INTRODUCTION 27 IMPACT TOPICS 28 Identification of Impact Topics 28 Impact Topics Included in the Analysis 28 Impact Topics Dismissed from Analysis 30 NATURAL RESOURCES 35 Overview 35 Geology, Physiography, and Soils 35 Floodplains 37 Wetlands 38 Water 38 Vegetation 40 Wildlife 42 National Natural Landmarks 49 CULTURAL RESOURCES 50 Introduction 50 Archeological Resources 50 i Ethnographic Resources 55 Prehistoric and Historic Structures 66 Cultural Landscapes 80 Museum Collections 88 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES 93 General Description 93 National Parks 95 State Parks 96 Atchafalaya Basin Program 97 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Recreation Facilities 97 Wildlife Management Areas, Wildlife Refuges 97 SCENIC RESOURCES 100 Louisiana Natural and Scenic Rivers System 100 National and State Scenic Byways 100 SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 102 Population Growth 103 Highlighted Demographics 104 Economic Overview 106 Tourism 114 Land Use 119 THREATS TO RESOURCES 123 Climate Change 123 Development and Urbanization 123 FUTURE STUDIES NEEDED 126 Archeological Research 126 Ethnographic Research 126 Historical Research 126 Cultural Landscape Research 126 Natural Resources Research 126 Socioeconomics Research 127 Visitor Experience Research 127 CHAPTER SEVEN: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS PURPOSE AND NEED 131 METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYZING IMPACTS TO ALL NON-CULTURAL RESOURCES 133 Introduction and General Definitions 133 Definitions of Intensity Levels 133 METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYZING IMPACTS TO CULTURAL RESOURCES 136 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and Impacts to Cultural Resources 136 Definitions of Intensity Levels 136 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS METHODOLOGY 138 Actions of Others 138 2010 Oil Spill 139 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES 141 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO NATURAL RESOURCES 149 Introduction 149 Potential Impacts Associated with the Alternatives 149 Potential Cumulative Impacts to Natural Resources 156 ii POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO CULTURAL RESOURCES 161 Introduction 161 Actions Common to All Alternatives 161 Archeological Resources 162 Ethnographic Resources 167 Historic and Prehistoric Structures 173 Cultural Landscape Resources 178 Museum Collections 183 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO VISITOR EXPERIENCE 190 Recreation Resources 190 Scenic Resources 192 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO THE SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 194 CHAPTER EIGHT: CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 203 Scoping 203 Tribes, Agencies, and Organizations Contacted 204 Other Consultation 204 List of Recipients of the Document 206 Substantive comments and Responses 206 LETTERS OF SUPPORT/COMMITMENT FROM PARTNERS 207 APPENDIXES, REFERENCES, PREPARERS AND CONSULTANTS APPENDIX C: LIST OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPES 219 REFERENCES 221 PREPARERS AND CONSULTANTS 229 FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1. Generalized Geologic Map of Louisiana 36 Figure 2. Composite Map of Louisiana Recreation Opportunities 95 Figure 3. Population Within the Heritage Area 104 Figure 4. Population Distribution Within the Heritage Area 104 Figure 5. Growth in Employment, 2001-2007 107 Figure 6. Unemployment Rate by Parish, 2006-2008 Estimate 108 Figure 7. Median Household Income by Parish 111 Figure 8. Percentage of Individuals Below Poverty Level by Parish 112 Figure 9. Educational Attainment by Parish 113 Figure 10. Land Cover for the Four Regions 121 Table 1. Evaluation of Alternatives in Relationship to Legislative Requirements and Heritage Area Goals 23 Table 2. Nonnative Invasive Plant Species 42 iii Table 3. Nonnative Invasive Species 43 Table 4. Threatened, Endangered, or Species of Concern: Other Mammals 44 Table 5. Threatened, Endangered, or Species of Concern: Birds 45 Table 6. Threatened, Endangered, or Species of Concern: Fish, Reptiles, Amphibians, and Invertebrates 47 Table 7. Top 10 Important Outdoor Recreational Activities among households (2008) 93 Table 8. Resident Top 3 Important Activities and Participation for Outdoor Recreation Louisiana Region 4 94 Table 9. Recreation Provider Limitations and Priorities, Louisiana Region 4 94 Table 10. Population by Race for all parishes within the Heritage Area, 2008 105 Table 11. Population by Ancestry for all parishes within the Heritage Area 105 Table 12. Major Religious Traditions 106 Table 13. Employment by Major Category, 2007 110 Table 14. Welcome Center Visitation, 2004 to 2009 114 Table 15. Traveler Spending (Heritage Area Parishes), 2004-2007 118 Table 16. Traveler Expenditures in the Heritage Area and the State, 2007 118 Table 17. Domestic Travel Impact, Alphabetical by Parish (Heritage Area Parishes), 2006 119 Table 18. Parish Information 122 Table 19. Historic and Cultural Protection Districts in Atchafalaya NHA 125 Table 20. Summary of Direct and Indirect Impacts of the Alternatives 141 iv Chapter 5 The Alternatives, Including the Preferred Alternative Above: Lake Warner Left: Bayou Sorrel Photo Credits: Charlie Fryling 2 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents four alternatives for The alternatives outline different future management of the Atchafalaya management concepts or ways to fulfill the National Heritage Area. The four mission, goals, and other legislative alternatives are labeled as follows: requirements of the national heritage area. Alternative A No Action, Alternative B: The desired resource conditions for the Focus on Natural Resources and Related heritage area remain the same for all of the Recreation, Alternative C: Focus on History alternatives, but each alternative emphasizes and Current Cultures, and Alternative D: different interpretive themes or “stories” The Heritage Connection – Nature, Culture, and uses those themes to focus on particular History and Recreation. Alternative D is the kinds of resources and visitor experiences. preferred alternative. 3 DESIRED FUTURE CONDITIONS Regardless of which management alternative Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, is selected, there are certain conditions that Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries, and other are desired for the future of Atchafalaya agencies, as appropriate. The ecosystem National Heritage Area. These conditions would be protected. Natural resources and are described here. visitors would be managed through collaboration with partners; this The Atchafalaya National Heritage Area collaborative management would take into would be managed as part of a greater account the ecological and social conditions ecological, social, economic, and cultural of the heritage area. The Commission would system. Effective management would be work with partners to encourage natural accomplished through a network of heritage resource management that balances area partners. Regional cooperation would preservation and conservation needs with involve federal, state, and local agencies, sustainable economic uses. American Indians, neighboring landowners, and other concerned parties. Ecological integrity would be maintained or restored in sensitive areas not developed for Good relations would be maintained with visitors. The Commission and its partners partners, adjacent landowners, surrounding would adapt to changing ecological and communities, and private and public groups social conditions within and external to the that affect and are affected by the heritage heritage
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Analysis of Lower Mississippi Valley Pottery
    In Situ Issue 1 In Situ 2016 Article 7 5-14-2016 Time and Place at Smith Creek: A Brief Analysis of Lower Mississippi Valley Pottery Zhenia Bemko University of Pennsylvania This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/insitu/vol5/iss1/7 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Time and Place at Smith Creek: A Brief Analysis of Lower Mississippi Valley Pottery This article is available in In Situ: https://repository.upenn.edu/insitu/vol5/iss1/7 Bemko: Time and Place at Smith Creek: A Brief Analysis of Lower Mississi ty of Pennsylvania under the supervision of Dr. Time and Place at Smith Creek: Meg Kassabaum. Due the expert assistance of Sheridan Small, Ashely Terry, Arielle Person, Alex A Brief Analysis of Lower Mississippi King, Zhenia Bemko and Dr. Kassabaum’s Intro Valley Pottery to Archeology classes the lab work was complet- ed in short order. Under the dedicated, careful Zhenia Bemko and watchful eye of Dr. Kassabaum much of the ceramic analysis and rim drawing is currently be- Abstract: ing completed through the assistance of Zhenia The Smith Creek Archeological Project offered Bemko, Alex King and Arielle Person. a perfect opportunity to study prehistoric Native Introduction: Americans. This particular mound site is located in the Lower Mississippi River Valley, and what Site is known from preliminary excavations is that the site was primarily occupied during the Coles The site is located roughly fourteen miles west of Creek period, roughly 700-1200 AD. It is also Woodville, Mississippi, where route 24 runs right known that this was a time of great transforma- through it.
    [Show full text]
  • Konriko Company Store/Conrad Rice Mill Tour & Boiling Point
    Golden Opportunity Konriko Company Store/Conrad Rice Mill Tour & Boiling Point Restaurant (Lunch on your own) February 20, 2019 $25.00 per person (Includes tour and transportation) The Conrad Rice Mill is the oldest rice mill in America. It is also one of the leading tourist attractions in this area of the Bayou Teche. In 1981, the Mill was placed on the National Register of Historic Places. P.A. Conrad founded the Conrad Rice Mill and Planting Company in 1912. He would cut the rice by hand and let it sun-dry on the levees before putting the rice in the threshers. The rice was poured into 100-pound bags and taken to the mill. At that time, the mill operated only three to four months out of the year. Conrad would sell his rice from inventory, waiting for the next crop to harvest. Conrad was an astute businessman, steadily growing his business to the point where he no longer grew enough rice to meet demands. Buying grain from the other growers in the area supplemented his own crop. To satisfy his customers’ requests, he also began to sell the rice in smaller sized bags. In the 1950’s, “KONRIKO” was trademarked as an acronym for “CONRAD RICE COMPANY.” A few years afterwards, P.A. Conrad retired and left the business to his three sons: Phillip, Julian, and Allen. Phillip, the oldest, died at a very early age leaving the two remaining brothers to carry on the family business. After many years of operating the mill, the brothers were at a retirement age and eventually only three New Iberia grocery stores remained as customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Native American Indian Tribes
    Louisiana Native American Indian Tribes Cultural Competency Needs and Potential Challenges January 2016 Objectives 1. The learner will be able to name 3 of the 8 Federal and State recognized tribes that are found in the state of Louisiana. 2. The learner will identify two serious behavioral health needs. 3. The learner will be able to state how historical trauma may impact current mental health needs and be a barrier to treatment. 4. The learner will name two strengths commonly found in Native American families/communities that can be leveraged for effective mental health treatment. 5. The learner will identify one way their agency or practice might change to better serve their Native American clients. There are 8 tribes recognized in Louisiana. 1. Adais Caddo Tribe (Robeline, LA) 2. Biloxi Chitimacha Confederation (3 bands) - Bayou Lafourche Band (Zachary, LA), Isle de Jean Charles Band (Montegut, LA), Grand Caillou/Dulac Band (Bourg, LA) 3. Clifton Choctaw (Clifton, LA) 4. Choctaw-Apache Tribe of Ebarb (Zwolle, LA) 5. Four Winds Cherokee (Leesville, LA) 6. Louisiana Band of Choctaw (Greenwell Springs, LA) 7. Pointe-Au-Chien Tribe (Montegut, LA) 8. United Houma Nation (Golden Meadow, LA) State Recognized Tribes in Louisiana: http://www.ncsl.org/research/state-tribal-institute/list-of-federal-and-state-recognized-tribes.aspx#s-la Current Federally Recognized Indian Tribes in Louisiana • The four federally recognized Indian tribes are: Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana Jena Band of Choctaw Indians Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe of Louisiana Federally Recognized Tribes in Louisiana: http://www.ncsl.org/research/state-tribal-institute/list-of-federal-and-state-recognized-tribes.aspx#s-la Map of Native American Tribes in Louisiana Native American Tribes of Louisiana, www.native-languages.org/louisiana Jena Band of Choctaw Indians • The Choctaw are thought to have inhabited parts of Louisiana along the Pascagoula and Pearl Rivers from the early 1700s.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Polygons
    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication 14
    ADDENDUM I: A GUIDE TO RESEARCH PAPERS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTH CAROLINA ON FILE WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGY BRANCH OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Thomas H. Hargrove Compiler NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL PUBLICATION NUl{BER 14 Published Jointly by the North Carolina Archaeological Council and the Archaeology Branch Division of Archives and History North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources Raleigh, 1981 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 AUTHOR INDEX 3 INDEX 65 CONTRIBUTING INSTITUTIONS 71 ii Introduction In 1980 the North Carolina Archaeological Council published a bibliography of archaeological papers on file with one of its member institutions. Appearing as Publication 13 in the Council Series, "A guide to research papers in the archaeology of North Carolina on file with the Archaeology Branch of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History" provided a list of 661 works to those involved with archaeological research or resource management. Most of these works, which cover archaeological projects throughout the state, were unpublished. Since the publication of that bibliography, the Archaeology Branch's file of dissertations, theses, articles, and contract reports on archaeology has grown. In addition, many of the major sources of published archaeological works in North Carolina have been indexed for use in environmental review at the branch. As a result, the number of additional references has led to the compilation of a second bibliography. As in the first bibliography, the works l1sted here represent a wide variety of research interests, techniques, formats, and purposes. The geographical focus varies from excavations of single structures or surveys of one-acre plots of land to overviews of physiographic regions that include one-third of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicant's Environmental Report Operating License Renewal Stage
    APPENDIX E Applicant’s Environmental Report Operating License Renewal Stage Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Applicant’s Environmental Report Operating License Renewal Stage INTRODUCTION System Energy Resources, Inc., South Mississippi Electric Power Association, and Entergy Operations, Inc. (hereafter referred to as "Entergy"), submit this Environmental Report (ER) in conjunction with the application to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) to renew the operating license for Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Unit 1 (hereafter referred to as GGNS or GGNS Unit 1) for twenty (20) years beyond the end of the current license term. In compliance with applicable USNRC requirements, this ER analyzes potential environmental impacts associated with renewal of the GGNS Operating License (OL). This ER is designed to assist the USNRC staff with the preparation of the GGNS specific Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) required for license renewal. The GGNS ER is provided in accordance with 10 CFR 54.23, which requires license renewal applicants to submit a supplement to the ER that complies with the requirements of Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 51. This report also addresses the more detailed requirements of NRC environmental regulations in 10 CFR 51.45 and 10 CFR 51.53(c), as well as the intent of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 USC 4321 et seq. For major federal actions, NEPA requires federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement that evaluates environmental impacts, alternatives to the proposed action, and irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources associated with implementation of the proposed action. Entergy used Supplement 1 to Regulatory Guide 4.2, "Preparation of Supplemental Environmental Reports for Applications to Renew Nuclear Power Plant Operating Licenses," as guidance on the format and content of this ER.
    [Show full text]
  • American Tri-Racials
    DISSERTATIONEN DER LMU 43 RENATE BARTL American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America We People: Multi-Ethnic Indigenous Nations and Multi- Ethnic Groups Claiming Indian Ancestry in the Eastern United States Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München vorgelegt von Renate Bartl aus Mainburg 2017 Erstgutachter: Prof. Berndt Ostendorf Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Eveline Dürr Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 26.02.2018 Renate Bartl American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America Dissertationen der LMU München Band 43 American Tri-Racials African-Native Contact, Multi-Ethnic Native American Nations, and the Ethnogenesis of Tri-Racial Groups in North America by Renate Bartl Herausgegeben von der Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1 80539 München Mit Open Publishing LMU unterstützt die Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München alle Wissenschaft ler innen und Wissenschaftler der LMU dabei, ihre Forschungsergebnisse parallel gedruckt und digital zu veröfentlichen. Text © Renate Bartl 2020 Erstveröfentlichung 2021 Zugleich Dissertation der LMU München 2017 Bibliografsche Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografe; detaillierte bibliografsche Daten sind im Internet abrufbar über http://dnb.dnb.de Herstellung über: readbox unipress in der readbox publishing GmbH Rheinische Str. 171 44147 Dortmund http://unipress.readbox.net Open-Access-Version dieser Publikation verfügbar unter: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-268747 978-3-95925-170-9 (Druckausgabe) 978-3-95925-171-6 (elektronische Version) Contents List of Maps ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G: Recreational Resources
    APPENDIX G: RECREATIONAL RESOURCES ID PARK NAME LOCATION RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES 1 Beaver Lake State Park Rogers, Arkansas Walking, fishing, picnicking 2 Bull Shoals State Park Bull Shoals, Arkansas Walking, fishing, picnicking 3 Devil’s Den State Park West Fork, Arkansas Walking, fishing swimming, picnicking, jogging, biking 4 Lake Fort Smith State Park Mountainburg, Arkansas Walking, fishing, swimming, picnicking, jogging 5 Mammoth Spring State Park Mammoth Spring, Arkansas Walking, fishing, picnicking 6 Withrow Springs State Park Huntsville, Arkansas Walking, fishing, swimming, picnicking, jogging, baseball/softball 7 Lake Poinsett State Park Harrisburg, Arkansas Walking, fishing, driving, picnicking, jogging, biking 8 Louisiana Purchase State Park Near Brinkley, Arkansas Walking 9 Old Davidsonville State Park Pocahontas, Arkansas Walking, fishing, driving, picnicking, jogging, biking 11 Village Creek State Park Wynne, Arkansas Walking, fishing, driving, picnicking, jogging, biking 12 Crowley’s Ridge State Park Walcott, Arkansas Walking, fishing, driving, swimming, picnicking, jogging, biking 13 Jacksonport State Park Jacksonport, Arkansas Walking, fishing, driving, swimming, picnicking, jogging, biking 14 Lake Charles State Park Powhatan, Arkansas Walking, fishing, driving, swimming, picnicking, jogging, biking 15 Lake Chicot State Park Lake Village, Arkansas Walking, fishing, driving, swimming, picnicking, jogging, biking 16 Lake Frierson State Park Jonesboro, Arkansas Walking, fishing, driving, picnicking, jogging, biking 17 Pinnacle
    [Show full text]