DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Historic Landmark Designations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Item No: AIR - 0080 Staff Responsible: Lisa McCarter Agenda Date: 10 Nov 2015 Prepared For: RE: DESCRIPTION Local Historic Landmark Designations MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FROM: LISA MCCARTER, PLANNER II SUBJECT: LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATIONS DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2015 CC: MELODY SHULER, WARREN WOOD Request: BOC consideration to vote on the commencement of local historic landmark designation reports for four town owned structures: Duncan McDonald House (115 McDonald Street), Niven‐Price Mercantile Building (216 W. North Main Street), The Meeting Place (209 W. South Main Street) and the Waxhaw Water Tank (113 McDonald Street). Benefits of Local Landmark Designation: Local Historic Designation of structures provides economic benefits, tourism and placemaking benefits, and community‐building benefits. The Town of Waxhaw wishes to preserve the unique character of Waxhaw for generations to come—including its historic buildings. Historic buildings are integral to an excellent Waxhaw visitor experience. Historic structures that are aesthetically cohesive and well promoted can be a community’s most important attraction and reinforce Waxhaw’s unique sense of place. The retention of our historic structures is a way to attract tourist dollars that contribute to the local economy. Waxhaw Local Landmarks: There are currently three designated local historic landmarks in Waxhaw. These are the Waxhaw Woman’s Club (200 E. South Main Street), the Cockinos Building/Antique Mart (portion of the 100 block of W. South Main Street), and the downtown overhead pedestrian bridge over the CSX railroad line. Local Landmark Designation vs. National Historic Registry Listing: National Historic Registry listings are mostly honorary and do not impose any restrictions that prevent private property owners from making changes to their buildings or demolishing them. Structures in the National Historic Registry are eligible for federal tax credits for rehabilitation, and will be eligible for State tax credits for rehabilitation in 2016. Local Historic Landmark Designation protects the historic integrity of a structure by requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness for exterior changes or renovations other than ordinary repair and maintenance. Work on a local landmark must be in keeping with the Waxhaw Historic Landmark Guidelines (copies are available for viewing at the Town Hall and can be printed upon request). Further, demolition to a local landmark can be delayed 365 days by the WHPC in order to consider other preservation options. Privately owned Local Historic Landmarks are given a 50% tax deferral of Union County and Waxhaw taxes. Local Landmark Designation Process: A Board of Commissioners vote for the commencement of a local historic landmark report is the first step in the process for local landmark designation. If the commencement is approved, the local landmark report is prepared and goes before the WHPC (Waxhaw Historic Preservation Commission) for recommendation. The report is then provided to the State Historic Preservation Office, which has 30 days to comment. After receiving comments from the State Historic Preservation Office, a joint public hearing is held with the WHPC and the Board of 1 | Page Commissioners in which the WHPC votes on a recommendation immediately prior to the Commissioners vote. A historic landmark designation ordinance is then prepared and filed with the Union County Register of Deeds. Quote for Local Historic Landmark Designation Reports: A quote for the four designations was received from Fearnbach History Services, Inc. for $6,140.50. This is a discounted rate as designation reports average $3,000 per structure and involve an extensive amount of research. Structures for Designation: State statutes require that local historic landmarks have historic significance as well as historic integrity. These four structures are all listed in the National Historic Registry and hold historic significance for Waxhaw. The Duncan McDonald House, Water Tank and Niven‐Price Building have all retained historic integrity, however, further study is necessary to determine if The Meeting Place has retained historic integrity through fire damage and different renovations over the years. Duncan McDonald House, 115 McDonald Street (Photo Taken Prior to Current Construction) Niven‐Price Mercantile Building, 216 West North Main Street 2 Waxhaw Water Tank, 113 McDonald Street The Meeting Place, 209 West South Main Street Attachments: Fearnbach History Services, Inc. Quote Fearnbach History Services, Inc. Company Profile Heather Fearnbach Resume National Registry Listings Local Historic Landmarks Frequently Asked Questions 3 PROPOSAL Duncan McDonald House, 115 McDonald Street Niven-Price Mercantile Building, 216 West North Main Street Water Tower ***House (The Meeting Place), 209 West South Main Street [pending integrity evaluation] Local Landmark Designation Reports Waxhaw, Union County October 21, 2015 Fearnbach History Services, Inc. I. LABOR COSTS Est. Hours Rate/Hour Cost($) A. Site Visit, Photography, and Digital Photograph Management Heather Fearnbach, Architectural Historian 18 $ 50.00 $ 900.00 B. Historic Background Research and Context Development Heather Fearnbach, Architectural Historian 30 $ 50.00 $ 1,500.00 C. Local Landmark Application Preparation and Submittal: First and Final Drafts Heather Fearnbach, Architectural Historian 120 $ 50.00 $ 6,000.00 Total Labor Costs $ 6,000.00 II. SUPPORT SERVICES/SUPPLIES Mileage: 220 mi. @ $0.575/mi. (1 research trip to Waxhaw and Monroe) $ 126.50 Fedex Ground shipping to Raleigh $ 14.00 Total Support Services/Supplies Costs $ 140.50 III. PROJECT COSTS Labor Subtotal $ 6,000.00 Overhead no charge Support Services/Supplies Subtotal $ 140.50 Profit (0%) Total Cost For Project $ 6,140.50 Fearnbach History Services, Inc. Company Profile Firm Introduction Fearnbach History Services, Inc. is a woman-owned and operated business offering high-quality historic resource research, documentation, analysis, and management services to federal agencies, local and state governments, non-profits, and individuals. Prior to starting the firm, president and owner Heather Fearnbach served as an architectural historian for Edwards-Pitman Environmental, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the Historic Sites Section of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources. She has worked throughout North Carolina, successfully completing historic architectural surveys and reports for transportation projects; municipal and county architectural surveys; and numerous nominations to the National Register of Historic Places, North Carolina Study List applications, local historic designation reports, and rehabilitation tax credit applications. Ms. Fearnbach also serves as a lecturer in the Art and Design Department and the coordinator of the Historic Preservation Certificate program at Salem College in Winston-Salem. She has been a lecturer in the history and interior architecture department at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Ms. Fearnbach meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards as set forth in 36 CFR Part 61 and is certified as a Historically Underutilized Business through the North Carolina Department of Administration. Fearnbach History Services, Inc. is located at 3334 Nottingham Road in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Types of Services Fearnbach History Services, Inc. is Qualified to Perform Architectural Surveys National Register of Historic Places Nominations NEPA/Section 106 Evaluations Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record Documentation Preservation Plans Local Historic Landmark and District Designation Reports Preservation Ordinance and Design Review Guidelines Preparation Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit Applications Historical Research HEATHER FEARNBACH FEARNBACH HISTORY SERVICES, INC. EDUCATION ● Ph.D. in History coursework, 2006-2007, University of North Carolina at Greensboro ● Master of Arts in History, emphasis in Public History, 1997, Middle Tennessee State University ● Graduate coursework in Anthropology, 1994-1995, University of Tennessee at Knoxville ● Bachelor of Arts in English Literature, 1993, University of North Carolina at Greensboro PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE President and Architectural Historian, Fearnbach History Services, Inc., Winston-Salem, N.C., established May 2008 ● Prepare National Register of Historic Places nominations, local designation reports, Section 106/4f reports, site management plans, historic structures reports, and historic furnishings plans ● Conduct comprehensive architectural surveys and historical research ● Provide historic rehabilitation tax credit consultation and application submittal services Lecturer, Art and Design Department, Salem College, Winston-Salem, N.C., Spring 2003 to present; Coordinator of the Certificate Program in Historic Preservation from its summer 2010 launch to present Teach “Introduction to Historic Preservation” (ARTD 206/PRSV 230) and “Preservation-Sensitive Sustainable Design” (PRSV 240) to undergraduate and continuing education students ● Recruit and advise certificate program students ● Arrange and supervise historic preservation internships Lecturer, History and Interior Architecture Departments, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Spring 2008 to Fall 2012 ● Taught HIS/IAR 628, “Identification and Evaluation of the Historic Built Environment” to graduate students Architectural Historian, Edwards-Pitman
Recommended publications
  • Education Recourse Packet for Teachers Dear Educators, Thank

    Education Recourse Packet for Teachers Dear Educators, Thank

    Education Recourse Packet for Teachers Dear Educators, Thank you for your interest in Somerset Place State Historic Site’s educational guided tours! We hope this packet will be helpful as you decide whether to bring your class to our historic site. This packet is designed to provide information about visiting our site, as well as ideas for activities to implement in your classroom before and after your field trip. Hopefully these activities will prepare the students for their trip, as well as reinforce what they learned during their experience at Somerset Place. Sincerely, The Staff of Somerset Place State Historic Site Phone: 252-797-4560 Email: [email protected] Website: https://historicsites.nc.gov/all-sites/somerset-place Today, Somerset Place State Historic Site is situated on 31 acres in Washington County, North Carolina. Most of the tour consists of walking outdoors and through seven buildings. We ask that visitors remember to wear comfortable walking shoes. In the spring and summer, an afternoon rain shower is not uncommon, and we do give guided tours in the rain. Please be prepared for this possibility. If you have scheduled a guided tour, we ask that your group arrives no later than 15 minutes before your scheduled start time. This will give you the opportunity to walk from the parking lot to our visitor center and for the group leader to fill out a brief group tour form. Since our restroom facilities are limited, allow students time to use the restrooms prior to the tour. We recommend allowing 15-30 minutes for this if you have a large group.
  • The Rich Heritage African Americans North Carolina

    The Rich Heritage African Americans North Carolina

    THE RICH HERITAGE OF AFRICAN NORTH CAROLINA AMERICANS HERITAGE IN North Carolina Division of Tourism, Film and Sports Development Department of Commerce NORTH 301 N. Wilmington Street, Raleigh, NC 27601-2825 1-800-VISIT NC • 919-733-8372 www.visitnc.com CAROLINA 100,000 copies of this document were printed in the USA at a cost of $115,000 or $1.15 each. Dear Friends, North Carolina is a state rich in diversity. And it is blessed with an even richer heritage that is just waiting to be explored. Some of the most outstanding contributions to our state’s heritage are the talents and achievements of African Americans. Their legacy embraces a commitment to preserving, protecting, and building stronger communities. The North Carolina Department of Commerce and Department of Cultural Resources acknowledge I invite you to use “The Rich Heritage of African Americans in North Carolina” as a guide to explore the history the generous support of the following companies in the production of this booklet: of the African American community in our state. If you look closely, you will find that schools, churches, museums, historic sites, and other landmarks tell the powerful story of African Americans in North Carolina. Food Lion Remember that heritage is not just a thing of the past. It is created every day. And by visiting these sites, you can be part Miller Brewing Company of it. Consider this an invitation to discover and celebrate the history that is the African American community. Philip Morris U.S.A. Its presence has made – and continues to make – North Carolina a better place to be.
  • Somerset Place and Its Restoration

    Somerset Place and Its Restoration

    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS IVIembers and Sloan Foundation I http://archive.org/details/somersetplaceits1954tarl ^^TH "^^ "7^%. ^^x^/' «?^ SOMERSET PLACE AND ITS RESTORATION Prepared For The Department of Conservation and Development Division of State Parks >- O BY VJILLlAl-i S. TARLTON U August 1, 195^ O z 5 z ffi c 1-^ C . 2- o , TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES Preface. o.. - .,» ... ..o ........... o .o ....... ,iii-iv History of the Lake Gcmpany. , . « , 1-1^ The Collins Family At "Somerset Place", ,....., 15-^8 Report On The Research And Restoration Program At Pettigrew State Park. , o, ....... c ..<,..,. 49-64 Recommendations For Further Development of The Historical Area At Pettigrew State Park. .... o ... ,o.. .o.. 65-69 Appendix I--Inventory of Personal Property of Josiah Collins III (1863). o ..'. o „,. o . 70-72 Appendix II"-V>[ills of Josiah Collins I; Josiah Collins III and Mary Collins. , . o . o. „ o . 73-78 Appendix III--Dro Edward Warren's Account of Life At Somerset Place ,..,,. .<...„ o » ....... o <,.....,........... 79-88 Appendix IV--Discovery of Lake Scuppernong. 89-96 Appendix V--Article From Edmund Puffin's The Farmers* Register . ....,<, ..... ... c ... c, .......... 97-116 Appendix VI--A Sketch of The Life of Josiah Collins I.... 117-126 Appendix VII--Somerset Plantation Sixty-Five Years Ago by Mrs. T. C. Holmes. .. o ....... .... .... 127-1^4 Appendix VIII-- Memories of Lake Phelps by Mrs. S. C. Davis. ... o .........,.,.,.,......,.. o ....... .135-137 Appendix IX--Southern Plantations Interestingly Described by Miss Matilda M. Kessinger. .138-l4l PREFACE Pettigrew State Park, situated on the northeast shore of Lake Phelps in Washington and Tyrrell counties, North Carolina, embraces the dwelling sites of two nineteenth century plantations which were notable for size and for the efficiency of their organization and operation.
  • General Assembly of North Carolina Session 2007

    General Assembly of North Carolina Session 2007

    GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW 2007-307 HOUSE BILL 1724 AN ACT TO DEDICATE AND ACCEPT CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS PART OF THE STATE NATURE AND HISTORIC PRESERVE, TO REMOVE CERTAIN LANDS FROM THE STATE NATURE AND HISTORIC PRESERVE, TO REDESIGNATE ELK KNOB STATE NATURAL AREA AS ELK KNOB STATE PARK, AND TO REDESIGNATE DISMAL SWAMP STATE NATURAL AREA AS DISMAL SWAMP STATE PARK. Whereas, Section 5 of Article XIV of the Constitution of North Carolina authorizes the dedication of State and local government properties as part of the State Nature and Historic Preserve upon acceptance by a law enacted by a three-fifths vote of the members of each house of the General Assembly and provides for removal of properties from the State Nature and Historic Preserve by a law enacted by a three-fifths vote of the members of each house of the General Assembly; and Whereas, the General Assembly enacted the State Nature and Historic Preserve Dedication Act, Chapter 443 of the 1973 Session Laws, to prescribe the conditions and procedures under which properties may be specifically dedicated for the purposes set out in Section 5 of Article XIV of the Constitution of North Carolina; and Whereas, over 20,350 acres have been added to the State Parks System since the last dedication and acceptance of properties as part of the State Nature and Historic Preserve pursuant to a petition of the Council of State dated 1 May 2007; and Whereas, in accordance with G.S. 143-260.8, on 1 May 2007 the Council of State voted to petition the General Assembly to enact a law pursuant to Section 5 of Article XIV of the Constitution of North Carolina to dedicate and accept properties added to the State Parks System and designated in the petition for inclusion as parts of the State Nature and Historic Preserve; and Whereas, as a part of its petition of 1 May 2007, the Council of State also requested the General Assembly to remove certain properties from the State Nature and Historic Preserve; and Whereas, G.S.
  • Magnolia- Summer 2001

    Magnolia- Summer 2001

    Magnolia Bulletin of the Magnolia grandiflora Southern Garden The Laurel Tree of Carolina Catesby’s Natural History, 1743 History Society Vol. XVI No. 4 Summer 2001 An Unlikely Plantation Mistress: Mary Riggs Collins and the Gardens at Somerset Place by John Sykes, Baton Rouge, Louisiana uring the 1850s visitors to Somerset Place Collins (1808-1872). In April 1856 her neighbor plantation in Washington County, North remarked that “Mrs. Collins[’s] garden is bringing out all D Carolina passed through miles of desolate swamp its treasures... ”3 lands before arriving at the borders of large cultivated Although gardening fell well within the “feminine fields, edged with cypress trees, along the shoreline of sphere” in the prescribed role of a plantation mistress in Lake Phelps, the second largest fresh water lake in the the ante-bellum South, Mary Riggs Collins was hardly a state. Antebellum visitors were often startled with the typical plantation mistress. Nothing in her early life marked contrast of the highly prepared her to be mistress of one of cultivated plantation North Carolina’s largest plantations. A s environment amid its “wilder,” e northerner by birth and education, for c r u more natural surroundings. The o almost four decades, she lived s e R image of clean, whitewashed exclusively at Somerset Place. Unlike l a r buildings under a lush grove of u other southern women in her class or t l trees gave the appearance of a u “station in life,” Mary Riggs Collins C f o small village, for in a sense, the lacked the suitable training for her t n plantation was a thriving e position on the plantation.
  • Bibliography of North Carolina Underwater Archaeology

    Bibliography of North Carolina Underwater Archaeology

    i BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH CAROLINA UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY Compiled by Barbara Lynn Brooks, Ann M. Merriman, Madeline P. Spencer, and Mark Wilde-Ramsing Underwater Archaeology Branch North Carolina Division of Archives and History April 2009 ii FOREWARD In the forty-five years since the salvage of the Modern Greece, an event that marks the beginning of underwater archaeology in North Carolina, there has been a steady growth in efforts to document the state’s maritime history through underwater research. Nearly two dozen professionals and technicians are now employed at the North Carolina Underwater Archaeology Branch (N.C. UAB), the North Carolina Maritime Museum (NCMM), the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and East Carolina University’s (ECU) Program in Maritime Studies. Several North Carolina companies are currently involved in conducting underwater archaeological surveys, site assessments, and excavations for environmental review purposes and a number of individuals and groups are conducting ship search and recovery operations under the UAB permit system. The results of these activities can be found in the pages that follow. They contain report references for all projects involving the location and documentation of physical remains pertaining to cultural activities within North Carolina waters. Each reference is organized by the location within which the reported investigation took place. The Bibliography is divided into two geographical sections: Region and Body of Water. The Region section encompasses studies that are non-specific and cover broad areas or areas lying outside the state's three-mile limit, for example Cape Hatteras Area. The Body of Water section contains references organized by defined geographic areas.
  • North Carolina General Assembly 1979 Session

    North Carolina General Assembly 1979 Session

    NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1979 SESSION RESOLUTION 21 HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 1128 A JOINT RESOLUTION DEDICATING PROPERTIES AS PART OF THE STATE NATURE AND HISTORIC PRESERVE. Whereas, Article XIV, Section 5 of the North Carolina Constitution authorizes the dedication of State and local government properties as part of the State Nature and Historic Preserve, upon acceptance by resolution adopted by a vote of three fifths of the members of each house of the General Assembly; and Whereas, the North Carolina General Assembly enacted the State Nature and Historic Preserve Dedication Act, Chapter 443, 1973 Session Laws to prescribe the conditions and procedures under which properties may be specially dedicated for the purposes enumerated by Article XIV, Section 5 of the North Carolina Constitution; and Whereas, the 1973 General Assembly sought to declare units of the State park system and certain historic sites as parts of the State Nature and Historic Preserve by adoption of Resolution 84 of the 1973 Session of the General Assembly; and Whereas, the effective date of 1973 Session Laws, Resolution 84 was May 10, 1973, while the effective date of Article XIV, Section 5, of the North Carolina Constitution and Chapter 443 of the 1973 Session Laws was July 1, 1973, thereby making Resolution 84 ineffective to confer the intended designation to the properties cited therein; and Whereas, the General Assembly desires to reaffirm its intention to accept certain properties enumerated in Resolution 84 of the 1973 General Assembly and to add certain properties acquired since the adoption of said Resolution as part of the State Nature and Historic Preserve; and Whereas, the Council of State pursuant to G.S.
  • DCR and DENR/Study State Attractions Savings. (Public) Sponsors: Representative Howard (Primary Sponsor)

    DCR and DENR/Study State Attractions Savings. (Public) Sponsors: Representative Howard (Primary Sponsor)

    GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 944* Short Title: DCR and DENR/Study State Attractions Savings. (Public) Sponsors: Representative Howard (Primary Sponsor). For a complete list of Sponsors, see Bill Information on the NCGA Web Site. Referred to: Finance. May 17, 2012 1 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 2 AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES AND THE 3 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES TO STUDY 4 VARIOUS REVENUE ENHANCEMENTS AND POTENTIAL SAVINGS AT STATE 5 HISTORIC SITES AND MUSEUMS, THE STATE ZOO, STATE PARKS, AND STATE 6 AQUARIUMS, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 7 EVALUATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. 8 The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: 9 SECTION 1. The Department of Cultural Resources shall implement the following 10 recommendations: 11 (1) Study site proximity and span of control to identify historic sites that could 12 adopt a coordinated management structure and report no later than 13 December 15, 2012, to the Senate Appropriations Committee on General 14 Government and Information Technology and the House Appropriations 15 Committee on General Government. 16 (2) Study reduced schedules for historic sites and report no later than December 17 15, 2012, to the Senate Appropriations Committee on General Government 18 and Information Technology and the House Appropriations Committee on 19 General Government. 20 (3) Study the feasibility of implementing more reliable mechanisms for counting 21 visitors and report no later than December 15, 2012, to the Senate 22 Appropriations Committee on General Government and Information 23 Technology and the House Appropriations Committee on General 24 Government.
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or

    Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or

    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
  • Abstract Postmortem Archaeology: Reinterpreting Salvaged Sites Using the CSS Neuse As a Case Study by Chelsea Hauck April 2016 Director: Dr

    Abstract Postmortem Archaeology: Reinterpreting Salvaged Sites Using the CSS Neuse As a Case Study by Chelsea Hauck April 2016 Director: Dr

    Abstract Postmortem Archaeology: Reinterpreting Salvaged Sites using the CSS Neuse as a Case Study By Chelsea Hauck April 2016 Director: Dr. Bradley Rodgers Department of History, Program in Maritime Studies Traditionally, salvaged wreck sites are disregarded by academia because contextual data are lost without detailed measured site maps. When these sites are ignored, the information that can be gained from individual artifacts and the collection as a whole is lost. Archaeologists have attempted to recreate salvaged sites to rediscover that contextual information. This thesis will examine a new set of methods called “postmortem” archaeology which will be applied to the American Civil War wreck of the CSS Neuse, which is the largest single collection of artifacts from a Confederate vessel. There are four issues affecting contextual data that have arisen since the salvage of the CSS Neuse wreck site: 1) how the ship was scuttled, 2) contamination by additional artifacts during excavation, 3) looting of artifacts during excavation, and 4) the timeline of the removal of the cannons. These four issues will serve as examples of broader problems that affect salvaged sites and possible methodologies that can be used to recreate the site. The “postmortem” methodology used to study the CSS Neuse can then be broadened and applied to other salvaged sites. Postmortem Archaeology: Reinterpreting Salvaged Sites using the CSS Neuse as a Case Study A Masters of Arts Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History Program in Maritime Studies East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Maritime Studies by Chelsea Hauck April 2016 © Chelsea Hauck 2016 Postmortem Archaeology: Reinterpreting Salvaged Sites using the CSS Neuse as a Case Study By Chelsea Hauck Approved By: Director of Thesis:_____________________________________________________________ Bradley Rodgers, Ph.D.
  • North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication 14

    North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication 14

    ADDENDUM I: A GUIDE TO RESEARCH PAPERS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTH CAROLINA ON FILE WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGY BRANCH OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Thomas H. Hargrove Compiler NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL PUBLICATION NUl{BER 14 Published Jointly by the North Carolina Archaeological Council and the Archaeology Branch Division of Archives and History North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources Raleigh, 1981 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 AUTHOR INDEX 3 INDEX 65 CONTRIBUTING INSTITUTIONS 71 ii Introduction In 1980 the North Carolina Archaeological Council published a bibliography of archaeological papers on file with one of its member institutions. Appearing as Publication 13 in the Council Series, "A guide to research papers in the archaeology of North Carolina on file with the Archaeology Branch of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History" provided a list of 661 works to those involved with archaeological research or resource management. Most of these works, which cover archaeological projects throughout the state, were unpublished. Since the publication of that bibliography, the Archaeology Branch's file of dissertations, theses, articles, and contract reports on archaeology has grown. In addition, many of the major sources of published archaeological works in North Carolina have been indexed for use in environmental review at the branch. As a result, the number of additional references has led to the compilation of a second bibliography. As in the first bibliography, the works l1sted here represent a wide variety of research interests, techniques, formats, and purposes. The geographical focus varies from excavations of single structures or surveys of one-acre plots of land to overviews of physiographic regions that include one-third of the state.
  • GENERAL ASSEMBLY of NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 H 2 HOUSE BILL 332 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/21/21

    GENERAL ASSEMBLY of NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 H 2 HOUSE BILL 332 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/21/21

    GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 H 2 HOUSE BILL 332 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/21/21 Short Title: Historic Sites-Property Sale Revenue. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: March 22, 2021 1 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 2 AN ACT TO ALLOW NET PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY 3 OWNED BY OR UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND 4 CULTURAL RESOURCES TO BE DEPOSITED INTO SPECIAL FUNDS TO BE USED 5 FOR THE BENEFIT OF CERTAIN STATE HISTORIC SITES AND MUSEUMS AND TO 6 REMOVE CERTAIN LAND FROM THE STATE NATURE AND HISTORIC 7 PRESERVE. 8 The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: 9 SECTION 1. G.S. 146-30 reads as rewritten: 10 "§ 146-30. Application of net proceeds. 11 (a) The net proceeds of any disposition made in accordance with this Subchapter shall be 12 handled in accordance with the following priority: 13 (1) First, in accordance with the provisions of any trust or other instrument of title 14 whereby title to real property was acquired. 15 (2) Second, as provided by any other act of the General Assembly. 16 (3) Third, by depositing the net proceeds with the State Treasurer. 17 Nothing in this section, however, prohibits the disposition of any State lands by exchange for 18 other lands, but if the appraised value in fee simple of any property involved in the exchange is 19 at least twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), then the exchange shall not be made without 20 consultation with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations.