Chapter 25.Qxp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 25.Qxp LUCY’S BABY AN EXTRAORDINARY NEW HUMAN FOSSIL RENEWS DEBATE OVER THE EVOLUTION OF UPRIGHT WALKING BY KATE WONG he arid badlands of Ethiopia’s remote Afar brow and the small size of the canine teeth, among Tregion have long been a favorite hunting ground other humanlike characteristics. Further evaluation, for paleoanthropologist. Many hominins—the however, would have to wait until the fossil was group that included all the creatures in the human cleaned—a painstaking process in which the line since it branched away from that of the cementlike matrix is removed from the bone almost chimps—once called it home. The area is perhaps grain by grain with dental tools. best known for having yielded “Lucy,” the 3.2–mil- lion–year–old skeleton of a human ancestor known It took Alemseged five years to expose key ele- as Australopithecus afarensis. Now researchers ments of the child’s anatomy; many more bones have unveiled another incredible A. afarensis speci- remain obscured by the sediment. Still, the find has men from a site called Dikika, just four kilometers already surrendered precious insights into a species from where Lucy turned up. But unlike Lucy, who that most researchers believe gave rise to our own was well into adulthood by the time she died, the genus, Homo. Alemseged and his colleagues new fossil is that of an infant, one who lived 3.3 described the fossil and its geologic and paleonto- million years ago (and yet has nonetheless been logical context in two papers published in the dubbed “Lucy’s baby”). September 21 Nature. And at a press conference held in Ethiopia to announce the discovery, they No other hominin skeleton of such antiquity— christened the child Selam—“peace” in several including Lucy—is as complete as this one. Ethiopian languages—in hopes of encouraging har- Moreover, as the earliest juvenile hominin ever mony among the warring tribes of Afar. found, the Dikika child provides an unprecedented opportunity to study growth processes in our The skeleton, judged to be that of a three-year- ancient relatives. “If Lucy was the greatest fossil old girl, consists of a virtually complete skull, the discovery of the 20th century,” says Donald C. entire torso, and parts of the arms and legs. Even the Johanson of Arizona State University, who kneecaps—no larger than macadamia nuts—are unearthed the famed fossil in 1974, “then this baby preserved. Many of the bones are still in articula- is the greatest find of the 21st thus far.” tion. Hominin fossils this complete are incredibly rare, and ones of infants are rarer still because their bones are that much more fragile. Indeed, the next BUNDLE OF JOY oldest skeleton of a juvenile that is comparably intact is a Neandertal baby dating to around 50,000 IT WAS THE AFTERNOON of December 10, years ago. 2000, when fossil hunters led by Zeresenay Alemseged, now at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, WALKING VS.CLIMBING spotted the specimen. Only part of its tiny face was visible; most of the rest of the skeleton was THE EXCEPTIONAL PRESERVATION of Selam, entombed in a melon-size block of sandstone. But as well as that of other animals found at the site, “right away it was clear it was a hominin,” indicates to team geologist Jonathan G. Wynn Alemseged recollects, noting the smoothness of the of the University of South Florida that her “Lucy’s Baby,” Kate Wong. Scientific American. December 2006, pp. 78–85. 1 2 Lucy’s Baby body was buried shortly after death by a flood imaging, the team was able to glimpse her semicir- event. Whether she perished in the flood or before it cular canal system, which is important for maintain- is unknown. ing balance. The researchers determined that Selam’s semicircular canals are similar to those of Although she was only three when she died, African apes and A. africanus. This, they suggest, Selam already possessed the distinctive characteris- could indicate that A. afarensis was not as fast and tics of her species. Her projecting snout and narrow agile on two legs as we modern humans are. It could nasal bones, for example, readily distinguish her also mean that A. afarensis was limited in its ability from another ancient youngster, the so-called Taung to decouple the movements of its head and torso, a child from South Africa, who was a member of the feat that seems to play a key role in endurance run- closely related A. africanus species. And her lower ning in our own species. jaw resembles mandibles from Hadar, the site where Lucy and a number of other A. afarensis individuals The conclusion that A. afarensis was a bipedal were found. creature with an upper body at least partly adapted for life in the trees echoes what Jack T. Stern, Jr., of Selam also exhibits the same mash-up of traits Stony Brook University and his colleagues wrote in her postcranial skeleton that has long vexed sci- years ago in their reports on Lucy and her contem- entists interested in how A. afarensis moved around poraries. “I was happy to see that this paper sug- the landscape. Scholars agree that A. afarensis was gests I might have been right,” Stern comments. a creature that got around capably on two legs. But Johanson agrees that the case for a partly arboreal A. starting in the 1980s, a debate erupted over whether afarensis is stronger than it once was. “Early on I the species was also adapted for life in the trees. The was a staunch advocate of strict terrestrial bipedal- argument centered on the observation that whereas ism in afarensis,” he remarks. But taking more the species has clear adaptations to bipedal walking recent findings into consideration, Johanson says, in its lower body, its upper body contains a number “it’s not out of the realm of possibility that they of primitive traits better suited to an arboreal exis- were still exploiting some of the arboreal habitats tence, such as long, curved fingers for grasping tree for getting off the ground at night and sleeping up branches. One camp held that A. afarensis had made there or going back to familiar food sources.” a full transition to terrestrial life and that the tree- friendly features of the upper body were just evolu- A combination of walking and climbing would tionary baggage handed down from an arboreal fit neatly with the picture that is emerging from ancestor. The other side contended that if A. afaren- studies of the environments of early hominins, sis had retained those traits for hundreds of thou- including Selam. Today Dikika is an expanse of sands of years, then tree climbing must have still dusty hills dotted with only the occasional tree or formed an important part of its locomotor reper- shrub. But 3.3 million years ago, it was a well- toire. watered delta flanked by forests, with some grass- lands nearby. “In this context, it is not surprising to Like her conspecifics, Selam has legs built for have an ‘ape’ that spends time in the trees and on the walking and fingers built for climbing. But she also ground,” comments project member René Bobe of brings new data to the controversy in the form of the University of Georgia. two shoulder blades, or scapulae—bones previous- ly unknown for this species. According to Not everyone is persuaded by the arboreal Alemseged, her scapulae look most like those of a argument. C. Owen Lovejoy of Kent State gorilla. The upward-facing shoulder socket is par- University disputes the claim that Selam’s scapula ticularly apelike, contrasting sharply with the later- looks like a gorilla’s. “It’s primitive, but it’s really ally facing socket modern humans have. This orien- more humanlike than gorillalike,” he remarks. tation, Alemseged says, may have facilitated raising Lovejoy, a leading proponent of the idea that A. the hands above the head—something primates do afarensis was a dedicated biped, maintains that the when they climb. (Although gorillas do not forelimb features that are typically held up as indi- climb as adults, they do spend time in the trees as cators that A. afarensis spent time in the trees only youngsters.) provide “evidence that the animal has an arboreal history.” The discovery of the famed Laetoli foot- Further hints of arboreal tendencies reside in prints in 1978 closed the debate, he states. The trail the baby’s inner ear. Using computed tomographic did not show a prehensile big toe, without which, Lucy’s Baby 3 Lovejoy says, A. afarensis simply could not move Alemseged’s team ascertained that Selam had about effectively in the trees. attained only 65 to 88 percent of the adult brain size by the age of three. A chimp of comparable age, in contrast, has reached more than 90 percent of its A HODGEPODGE HOMININ adult brain size. This raises the tantalizing possibil- ity that A. afarensis experienced a more humanlike EXPERTS MAY DISAGREE over the functional pattern of brain growth. significance of Selam’s apelike skeletal characteris- tics, but they concur that different parts of the More fossils are needed to discern whether the hominin body were undergoing selection at differ- new skeleton is representative of A. afarensis ent times. A. afarensis is “a good example of mosa- infants, and scientists are doubtless eager to recover ic evolution,” Johanson states. “You don’t just mag- remains of other A. afarensis children of different ically flip some evolutionary switch somewhere and ages—if they ever can—to see how they compare.
Recommended publications
  • The Hairless Mutation Hypothesis
    Genes and Environment, Vol. 36, No. 3 pp. 78–88 (2014) Review The Hairless Mutation Hypothesis: a Driving Force of Humanization by Enforcing Bipedalism to Hold a Baby, by Allowing Immature Baby Delivery to Enlarge the Brain after Birth, and by Making Use of Fire to Get Meat and to Cook Foods Shizuyo Sutou1 School of Pharmacy, Shujitsu University, Okayama, Japan Received February 27, 2014; Revised June 8, 2014; Accepted June 13, 2014 J-STAGE Advance published date: June 19, 2014 Three characteristics, i.e., bipedalism, nakedness, and Three Major Characteristics of Humans the family reproductive unit, distinguish humans from Bipedalism other primates. Once a hairless mutation was initially in- There are several characteristics which separate hu- troduced, these three could be explained inseparately. All mans from other primates such as bipedalism, practical primates except humans can carry their babies without us- hairlessness, a family as a social unit, a large neocortex, ing their hands. A hairless mother would be forced to stand small canine teeth, uses of tools, ˆre, and language, and walk upright to hold a baby. As her activities were culture, and civilization. Especially, bipedalism, practi- markedly limited, the male partner had to collect food and carry it to her to keep their baby from starving. He must cal hairlessness, and family as a social unit are consi- have been sexually accepted by her at any time as a re- dered to constitute basic key factors of the origin of ward for food. Sexual relations irrespective of estrus cy- humans. Other important characteristics such as a large cles might have strengthened the pair bond, leading to fa- neocortex and the use of tools and ˆre are considered to mily formation.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Anthropology?
    Chapter 1 What Is Anthropology? nthropology is the scientific study of the origin, the behaviour, and the A physical, social, and cultural development of humans. Anthropologists seek to understand what makes us human by studying human ancestors through archaeological excavation and by observing living cultures throughout the world. In this chapter, you will learn about different fields of anthropology and the major schools of thought, important theories, perspectives, and research within anthropology, as well as the work of influential anthropologists. You’ll also learn methods for conducting anthropological research and learn how to formulate your own research questions and record information. Chapter Expectations By the end of this chapter, you will: • summarize and compare major theories, perspectives, and research methods in anthropology • identify the significant contributions of influential anthropologists • outline the key ideas of the major anthropological schools of thought, and explain how they can be used to analyze features of cultural systems Fields of Anthropology • explain significant issues in different areas of anthropology Primatology Dian Fossey (1932–1985) • explain the main research methods for conducting anthropological Physical Anthropology Archaeology Cultural Anthropology research Biruté Galdikas (1946–) Jane Goodall (1934–) Sue Savage-Rumbaugh (1946–) Archaeology Forensic Human Variation Ethnology Linguistic Anthropology Key Terms Prehistoric Anthropology Charles Darwin Ruth Benedict (1887–1948) Noam Chomsky
    [Show full text]
  • Class 2: Early Hominids
    Earliest Hominins CHARLES J VELLA, PHD JULY 25 2018 This is latest theory of how Lucy died! We are Mammals 3 defining mammalian traits: hair, mammary glands, homeothermy Mammalian traits show an adaptation for adaptability Miocene era: 23 to 5 Ma, Warmer global period • Ape grade: Planet of the apes • Over 30 genera and 100 species of ape – compared with 6 today • Location: Africa and Eurasia Proconsul: 25 to 23 Ma, during Miocene; arboreal quadruped Primates • Larger body size • Larger brain • Complete stereoscopic vision • Longer gestation, infancy, life span • More k-selected (tend towards single offspring) • Greater dependency on learned behavior • More social Great Apes Bonobos and Chimps split ~1 Ma Superfamily: Hominoidea Gibbons, Gorillas, Orangutan, Chimpanzee, Human Greater encephalization (brain to body ratio) = smarter larger body, brachiation, social complexity, lack of tail Why did Newt Gingrich recommend this book to all new politicians? Detailed and thoroughly engrossing account of ape rivalries and coalitions. Machiavellianism: political behavior is rooted at a level of development that is below the cognitive and is as much instinctive as it is learned. de Waal 1982 De Waal: Machiavellian IQ Machiavelli's The Prince: Frans de Waal introduced the term 'Machiavellian Intelligence' to describe the social and political behavior of chimpanzees Social behaviors: reconciliation, alliance, and sabotage Tactical deception in primates: Vervet monkeys use false predator alarm calls to get extra food Chimpanzees use deception to mate with females belonging to alpha male Chimpanzee cultures • Chimp Cultures: shared behaviors in different communities: • pounding actions • fishing; • probing; • forcing • comfort behavior • miscellaneous exploitation of vegetation properties • exploitation of leaf properties; • grooming; • attention-getting.
    [Show full text]
  • Anth 1 Lecture Note Guide – Final Exam Updated June 2, 2017 Key
    Anth 1 Lecture note guide – Final Exam Updated June 2, 2017 Key Terms – The final exam is cumulative, so review all the other study guides too. Hallux Altricial young Collateral ancestry Lucy Direct ancestry Selam (Dikika baby) taphonomy Taung child Epochs: Turkana Boy Eocene Oligocene Dmanisi Miocene Pliocene Australopithecus afarensis Pleistocene Au. africanus Holocene Paranthropus aethiopicus P. robustus Foramen magnum P. boisei (Know there are three Paranthropus) Diastema Homo habilis (includes H. rudolfensis) Sectorial first premolar H. erectus (includes H. ergaster) H. heidelbergensis + H. antecessor Cranial capacity H. neanderthalensis H. sapiens Postorbital constriction Cave art Pre-frontal cortex (frontal lobe) Hominoid / hominin / Homo Oldowan tools “Early hominins” adaptive radiation Acheulean handaxe “Early humans” adaptive radiation Lumbar curve “Archaic humans” adaptive radiation Facultative bipedalism “Modern humans” Obligate bipedalism Upper Paleolithic Precocial young Thought Questions – Answer each with a brief outline or paragraph. Include specific examples and definitions whenever possible. 1. Make another timeline, this time from memory, this time with 6 million years. Place the following on it: a. First hominins (hint, may need to draw an arrow off the timeline). b. Each of the species listed above. c. Each of the adaptive radiations listed above. d. First known use of tools e. First known use of fire f. First known obligate bipeds g. First known elderly folks h. First known sexually dimorphic pelves (in hominins) i. First known site outside Africa j. First species with definite burials k. First farming l. First writing (i.e., when written history began) 2. What is taphonomy? Why is it important in paleoanthropology? Discuss at least two examples of specific fossils with interesting taphonomic stories.
    [Show full text]
  • Hominid/Human Evolution
    Hominid/Human Evolution Geology 331 Paleontology Primate Classification- 1980’s Order Primates Suborder Prosimii: tarsiers and lemurs Suborder Anthropoidea: monkeys, apes, and hominids Superfamily Hominoidea Family Pongidae: great apes Family Hominidae: Homo and hominid ancestors Primate Classification – 2000’s Order Primates Suborder Prosimii: tarsiers and lemurs Suborder Anthropoidea: monkeys, apes, and hominids Superfamily Hominoidea Family Hylobatidae: gibbons Family Hominidae Subfamily Ponginae: orangutans Subfamily Homininae: gorillas, chimps, Homo and hominin ancestors % genetic similarity 96% 100% with humans 95% 98% 84% 58% 91% Prothero, 2007 Tarsiers, a primitive Primate (Prosimian) from Southeast Asia. Tarsier sanctuary, Philippines A Galago or bush baby, a primitive Primate (Prosimian) from Africa. A Slow Loris, a primitive Primate (Prosimian) from Southeast Asia. Check out the fingers. Lemurs, primitive Primates (Prosimians) from Madagascar. Monkeys, such as baboons, have tails and are not hominoids. Smallest Primate – Pygmy Marmoset, a New World monkey from Brazil Proconsul, the oldest hominoid, 18 MY Hominoids A lesser ape, the Gibbon from Southeast Asia, a primitive living hominoid similar to Proconsul. Male Female Hominoids The Orangutan, a Great Ape from Southeast Asia. Dogs: Hominoids best friend? Gorillas, Great Apes from Africa. Bipedal Gorilla! Gorilla enjoying social media Chimp Gorilla Chimpanzees, Great I’m cool Apes from Africa. Pan troglodytes Chimps are simple tool users Chimp Human Neoteny in Human Evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadar Formation Deposits at Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia
    Journal of African Earth Sciences 112 (2015) 234e250 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of African Earth Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jafrearsci Tephrostratigraphy and depositional environment of young (<2.94 Ma) Hadar Formation deposits at Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia * Erin N. DiMaggio a, , J Ramon Arrowsmith b, Christopher J. Campisano c, Roy Johnson d, Alan L. Deino e, Mark Warren f, Shimeles Fisseha g, Andrew S. Cohen d a Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA b School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA c Institute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 874101, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA d Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA e Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA f ConocoPhillips, 600 N Dairy Ashford, Houston, TX 77079, USA g Institute of Geophysics, Space Sciences and Astronomy, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia article info abstract Article history: The Pliocene Hadar Formation, exposed throughout the lower Awash Valley, Ethiopia, chronicles the Received 23 January 2015 evolution and paleoenvironmental context of early hominins. Deposition of the Hadar Formation Received in revised form continued until at least 2.94 Ma, but what transpired in the Hadar Basin after this time remains poorly 21 September 2015 documented due to an erosional event that truncated the formation throughout much of the valley. Here Accepted 22 September 2015 we present geologic mapping and stratigraphic analysis of a 26 m-thick section of sedimentary rocks and Available online 30 September 2015 tephras exposed in the Ledi-Geraru project area in the region of Gulfaytu.
    [Show full text]
  • 016 PVAVYHL Hominoid
    016 Paleontología de Vertebrados y Humana Hominoidea www.aragosaurus.com PALEONTOLOGÍA DE VERTEBRADOS Y HUMANA (PAVYH ULTIMO AÑO LICENCIATURA GEOLOGÍA 2012-2013) UNIVERSIDAD DE ZARAGOZA PROFESORES: GLORIA CUENCA JOSÉ IGNACIO CANUDO JARA PARRILLA DIEGO CASTANERA VICTOR SAUQUÉ Cercopithoidea Hominoidea Caracteres de los hominoideos. Cerebro relativamente grande Escápula con fuerte acromión Cabeza articular del húmero redondeada y orientada cola ausente medialmente En la actualidad se ha demostrado un El cráneo es movimiento cuadrúpedo tanto por el relativamente suelo como por las ramas de los árboles primitivo, con pequeños molares y largos caninos Carece de cola Proconsul es el primer hominoideo del registro fósil y el más primitivo. Se ha encontrado en el Mioceno Inferior del Este de África (Kenia). La historia evolutiva de los hominoideos comenzó en África La anatomía del codo y la muñeca es similar a las formas derivadas Hominidae se divide en dos subfamilias, los Ponginae que agrupa a los orangutanes y formas relacionadas, y Homininae que agrupa a humanos, gorilas, chimpancés, y primates cercanos. Hominini cuadrúpedos bípedos Homininae Ponginae Las dos subfamilias señalan dos diferentes tipos de locomoción. Ponginae adaptada braquiadores a la vida en los árboles (como sus ancestros). Hominidae adaptada a la vida terrestre, bien cuadrúpeda o bípeda Hominidae Para algunos autores el primer representante de los homínidos es Kenyapithecus del Mioceno inferior del Este de África. Formas cercanas agrupadas en la subfamilia Kenyapithecinae también se han encontrado en el Mioceno de Turquía y Europa. Kenyapithecus presenta dientes adaptados a comer semillas y frutos secos Los kenyapitecinos presentan adaptaciones a desplazarse sobre la cara anterior de las segundas falanges de los dedos segundo a quinto (“sobre los nudillos”).
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Series N° 33
    33 World Heritage papers Human origin sites and the Heritage World in Africa Convention 33 World Heritage papers HEADWORLD HERITAGES 2 Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Africa For more information contact: UNESCO World Heritage Centre papers 7, place Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel: 33 (0)1 45 68 18 76 Fax: 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail: [email protected] http://whc.unesco.org World HeritageWorld Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Africa Nuria Sanz, Editor Coordinator of the World Heritage/HEADS Programme Table of Contents Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Foreword Page 6 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France Kishore Rao, Director, UNESCO World Heritage Centre © UNESCO 2012 Foreword Page 7 All rights reserved H.E. Amin Abdulkadir, Minister, Ministry of Culture and Tourism Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia ISBN 978-92-3-001081-2 Introduction Page 8 Original title: Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Africa Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Coordination of the HEADS Programme, UNESCO World Heritage Centre The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Outstanding Universal Value of human evolution in Africa Page 13 Yves Coppens The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Among the Afar People of Ethiopia and Their Contribution to the Development Process
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Dispute resolution mechanisms among the Afar People of Ethiopia and their contribution to the Development Process KA GEBRE-EGZIABHER1 Abstract Disputes are one of the major factors negatively affecting the development process of any nation. They divert resources that could otherwise be used productively; hence, there appears to be general agreement on their undesirability (Alexander 2005). Dispute- resolution practices and peace-building mechanisms remain problematic for most societies in the world including those in Africa, as most of them are trying to imitate Western modalities instead of using their own indigenous knowledge systems and skills. The dispute-resolution practices of the ancient Ethiopians in have been established for many thousands of years, and have been used to prevent loss of life and the destruction of property. This paper reveals that the dispute-resolution practices of the Afar people of Ethiopia significantly contributed to the development process. The article reveals that it is difficult to attain development without developing dispute resolution practices and it also shows that it is difficult, though not impossible, to resolve disputes without assuring development by eliminating poverty. Thus, it concludes that the ancient Aksumite, which was one of the first four great civilizations on earth, must have developed a unique type of dispute resolution practices that enabled Ethiopia of that time to be one of the leading countries in the globe during that time. No doubt every nation has its own indigenous dispute-resolution practices. It is thus possible to resolve disputes in by using indigenous knowledge systems, instead of using Western modalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Zeresenay “Zeray” Alemseged
    Prof. Zeresenay “Zeray” Alemseged Academic Appointments Current: Donald N. Pritzker Professor DEPARTMENT OF ORGANISMAL BIOLOGY AND ANATOMY UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Previous: 2008 – 2016 Irvine Chair and Senior Curator of Anthropology Department of Vertebrate Zoology and Anthropology Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability The California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, USA 2004 - 2008 Senior Scientist, Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany 2000 - 2003 Postdoctoral Research Associate, Institute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA 1998 - 2000 Research Associate, French Center for Ethiopian Studies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 1991 - 1993 Junior Geologist, Paleoanthropology Laboratory, National Museum of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Educational Background 1998 Ph.D., Laboratory of Paleontology, University of Paris VI and the National Museum of Natural History, Paris, France 1994 M.Sc., Paleontology, Institute of Evolutionary Sciences, University of Montpellier II, France 1993 French Language Diploma, Cavilam de Vichy International Language School, Vichy, France 1990 B.Sc., Geology, Department of Geology, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia Honors and Awards 2018 Named the Donald N. Pritzker Professor by the University of Chicago 2014 Named an Expert by the National Geographic Society 2013 Named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advacement of Science 2011 Named a Fellow of the California Academy
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE DEAN FALK October, 2011 University Address and phone: Department of Anthropology Florida State University 1847 W. Tennessee Street Tallahassee, Florida 32306-7772 (850) 644-7016; fax: (850) 645-0032; email: [email protected] http://www.deanfalk.com web sites http://www.anthro.fsu.edu/people/faculty/falk.html http://sarweb.org/index.php?senior_scholar_dean_falk EDUCATION 1972-1976 University of Michigan, Ph.D. in anthropology, 1976. 1967-1972 University of Illinois, Chicago Campus; major in anthropology, minor in mathematics. Bachelor of Arts with honors, 1970; Master of Arts, 1972. 1964-1965 University of Washington; major in mathematics. 1962-1963 Antioch College, major in mathematics. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2010-2013 Senior Scholar, School for Advanced Research; Santa Fe, New Mexico 2003-current Hale G. Smith Professor of Anthropology, Florida State University 2008-2009 Resident scholar, School for Advanced Research; Santa Fe, New Mexico 8/2002-5/2008 Chair, Department of Anthropology, Florida State University 2001-2003 Professor of Anthropology, Florida State University 1988-2001 University at Albany, State University of New York: Professor of Anthropology 1991-2001 University at Albany, State University of New York: Adjunct Professor of Psychology 1991-1992 New York University: Visiting Professor of Anthropology 1986-1988 Purdue University: Associate Professor of Anthropology 1980-1986 University of Puerto Rico, School of Medicine: Asst., Assoc. (1982) Prof. of Anatomy Caribbean Primate Research Center: Curator Primate
    [Show full text]
  • Zeininger-Dissertation-2013
    Copyright by Angel Diane Zeininger 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Angel Diane Zeininger Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Ontogeny of Bipedalism: Pedal Mechanics and Trabecular Bone Morphology Committee: Liza Shapiro, Supervisor John Kappelman Denne Reed E. Christopher Kirk Jody Jensen Brian Richmond Ontogeny of Bipedalism: Pedal Mechanics and Trabecular Bone Morphology by Angel Diane Zeininger, B.S.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2013 Dedication For Roscoe, Aiden River, and Siena Rose. May you walk the path less traveled. Acknowledgements Completion of this dissertation was facilitated with the help of many people at various institutions over the course of many years. I have had the great fortune of working with some of the most considerate and dedicated mentors in the field of physical anthropology and would like to take this opportunity to thank them in turn. Applying to work with my dissertation advisor, Liza Shapiro, was the best decision I could have made. A good relationship between a graduate student and an advisor is essential for the intellectual growth of the student, and I could not have asked for a more understanding and generally awesome advisor than Liza. Liza gave me a chance and believed in me, even when I questioned myself, and I can only hope that I lived up to her expectations. From my Masters through my dissertation, Liza encouraged me to develop projects about which I was passionate but that were also reasonable and within her expertise.
    [Show full text]