Ten Years of Rebuilding River Queens the New World Trade Center Is Rising from Ground Zero

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Hudson Ten years of rebuilding River Queens The new World Trade Center is rising from ground zero. Two skyscrapers, a memorial, a museum and a transit hub are under construction. Three more towers and a performing arts center are planned. Manhattan 1 World Trade Center World 2 World Trade Center (Formerly Freedom Tower) Trade 1,349 feet high, 88 stories 1,776 feet high, 102 stories Center 3.1 million rentable site 2.6 million square feet square feet Brooklyn Construction began April 2006 The foundation Scheduled to open in 2013 construction It will have 69 office floors, began the a restaurant, an enclosed summer of observation deck and a 2010. two-level broadcast facility. 3 World Trade Center 1,170 feet high 7 World Trade Center 80 stories 750 feet high, 52 stories 2.8 million square feet 1.7 million square feet Construction began The rebuilt tower opened in May summer 2010 2006 and is two-thirds leased. The building will include Performing Arts Center 53 floors of office space and five retail levels. 1,000-seat venue with focus on modern dance No construction is scheduled 4 World Trade Center while site is used as an exit 977 feet high from commuter trains. 72 stories 2.3 million square feet The National September 11 Memorial & Museum It includes retail and commercial office Reflecting pools where the space. Trade Center towers stood Names of 2,987 victims of the 1993 and 2001 attacks will be World Trade Center inscribed around pools in the Transportation Hub 8-acre plaza. 800,000 square feet, The above-ground memorial will comparable to Grand open Sept. 11, 2011 and the museum Central Terminal will open in 2012. It will provide access to PATH commuter 5 World Trade Center rail, subway lines and There is no construction timetable yet. It will Hudson River ferries. stand on the site formerly occupied by the It is expected to be remains of the Deutsche Bank building. completed by 2014. Among 1 WTC Interna- Interna- Taipei World tional Petronas New York Financial tional 1 WTC giants 101 Commerce Towers Willis Finance 1,776 Center Centre Tower New York 1 World Trade Taiwan Kuala Zifeng Center Incomplete Shanghai Tower Center will be Hong Kong Lumpur, Chicago Guangzhou, 1,368** 1,666* Malaysia among the 1,614 1,588 Nanjing 1,450** China Destroyed tallest buildings 1,482 1,476 1,439 in the world. The towering Burj Khalifa was completed last year. Burj Khalifa Dubai, UAE 2,717 feet * Top of spire ** Top of roof SOURCES: Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat; Silverstein Properties; The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey AP SEPT 11 GROUND ZERO 081911: Graphic shows the state of reconstruction of the World Trade Center; 4c x 9 inches; with any related stories; ETA 6 p.m. Editor’s Note: It is mandatory to include all sources that accompany this graphic when repurposing or editing it for publication.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

TM 3.1 Inventory of Affected Businesses
N E W Y O R K M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O U N C I L D E M O G R A P H I C A N D S O C I O E C O N O M I C F O R E C A S T I N G POST SEPTEMBER 11TH IMPACTS T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M NO. 3.1 INVENTORY OF AFFECTED BUSINESSES: THEIR CHARACTERISTICS AND AFTERMATH This study is funded by a matching grant from the Federal Highway Administration, under NYSDOT PIN PT 1949911. PRIME CONSULTANT: URBANOMICS 115 5TH AVENUE 3RD FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10003 The preparation of this report was financed in part through funds from the Federal Highway Administration and FTA. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do no necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration, FTA, nor of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M NO.
[Show full text]
1 World Trade Center Llc, Et Al
1 WORLD TRADE CENTER LLC, ET AL. - DETERMINATION - 12/03/09 In the Matter of 1 WORLD TRADE CENTER LLC, ET AL. TAT(H)07-34 (CR), ET AL. - DETERMINATION NEW YORK CITY TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION COMMERCIAL RENT TAX – THE LESSEES' PAYMENTS TO THE PORT AUTHORITY AFTER SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 DID NOT CONSTITUTE BASE RENT PAID FOR TAXABLE PREMISES BECAUSE THE LESSEES NO LONGER HAD THE RIGHT TO OCCUPY SPECIFIC SPACE AFTER THE GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER SITE ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. THUS, THE COMMERCIAL RENT TAX DOES NOT APPLY TO THOSE PAYMENTS. DECEMBER 3, 2009 NEW YORK CITY TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION : In the Matter of the Petition : DETERMINATION : of : : TAT(H)07-34(CR), et al. 1 World Trade Center LLC, et al. : : Schwartz, A.L.J.: Petitioners, 1 World Trade Center LLC, 2 World Trade Center LLC, 4 World Trade Center LLC and 5 World Trade Center LLC (now known as 3 World Trade Center LLC) (“Petitioners” or the “Silverstein Lessees”) filed Petitions for Hearing with the New York City (“City”) Tax Appeals Tribunal (“Tribunal”) seeking redeterminations of deficiencies of City Commercial Rent Tax (“CRT”) under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the City Administrative Code (“Code”) for the five tax years beginning June 1, 2001 and ending May 31, 2006 (“Tax Years”). A hearing was held and various documents were admitted into evidence. Petitioners were represented by Elliot Pisem, Esq. and Joseph Lipari, Esq. of Roberts & Holland LLP. The Commissioner of Finance (“Respondent” or “Commissioner”) was represented by Frances J.
[Show full text]
Negotiating the Mega-Rebuilding Deal at the World Trade Center: Plans for Redevelopment
NEGOTIATING THE MEGA-REBUILDING DEAL AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER: PLANS FOR REDEVELOPMENT DARA M. MCQUILLAN* & JOHN LIEBER ** Good morning. The current state of Lower Manhattan is the result of multiple years of planning and refinement of designs. Later I will spend a couple of minutes discussing the various buildings that we are constructing. First, to give you a little sense of perspective, Larry Silverstein,1 a quintessential New York developer, first got involved at the World Trade Center and with the Port Authority, owner of the World Trade Center,2 in 1980 when he won a bid to build 7 World Trade Center.3 In 1987, Silverstein completed the seventh tower, just north of the World Trade Center site.4 As Alex mentioned, 7 World Trade Center was not the most attractive building in New York and completely cut off Greenwich Street. Greenwich Street is the main street running through Tribeca and connects one of the most dynamic and interesting neighborhoods in New York to the financial district.5 Greenwich serves as a major link to Wall Street. I used to live in SoHo. I would walk to work at the Twin Towers every morning down Greenwich Street past the Robert DeNiro Film Center, Bazzini‘s Nuts, the parks, and the lofts of movie stars, and all of a sudden I would be in front of a 656-foot brick wall of a building. There were huge wind vortexes which often swept garbage all over the place, you could never get a cab, and it was a very * Vice President of Marketing and Communications for World Trade Center Properties, LLC, and Silverstein Properties, Inc.
[Show full text]
As Lower Manhattan Rebuilds, a New Map Takes Shape
ID NAME: Nxxx,2004-07-04,A,024,Bs-BW,E2 3 7 15 25 50 75 85 93 97 24 Ø N THE NEW YORK TIMES METRO SUNDAY, JULY 4, 2004 CITY A Status Report: As Lower Manhattan Rebuilds, a New Map Takes Shape By DAVID W. DUNLAP and GLENN COLLINS Below are projects in and around ground DEVELOPMENT PLAN zero and where they stood as of Friday. Embassy Goldman Suites Hotel/ Sachs Bank of New York BUILDINGS UA Battery Park Building Technology and On the World Trade Center site City theater site 125 Operations Center PARKS GREENWICH ST. 75 Park Place Barclay St. 101 Barclay St. (A) FREEDOM TOWER / TOWER 1 2 MURRAY ST. Former site of 6 World Trade Center, the 6 United States Custom House 0Feet 200 Today, the cornerstone will be laid for this WEST BROADWAY skyscraper, with about 60,000 square feet of retail space at its base, followed by 2.6 mil- Fiterman Hall, lion square feet of office space on 70 stories, 9 Borough of topped by three stories including an obser- Verizon Building Manhattan PARK PL. vation deck and restaurants. Above the en- 4 World 140 West St. Community College closed portion will be an open-air structure Financial 3 5 with wind turbines and television antennas. Center 7 World The governor’s office is a prospective ten- VESEY ST. BRIDGE Trade Center 100 Church St. ant. Occupancy is expected in late 2008. The WASHINGTON ST. 7 cost of the tower, apart from the infrastruc- 3 World 8 BARCLAY ST. ture below, is estimated at $1 billion to $1.3 Financial Center billion.
[Show full text]
WORLD TRADE CENTER Bachelor Thesis
Palacký University Olomouc Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 - WORLD TRADE CENTER Bachelor thesis BACHELOR THESIS ADVISOR: WRITTEN BY: PhDr. Matthew Sweney, Ph.D. Halina Kudličková Olomouc 2016 Univerzita Palackého v Olomouc Filozofická fakulta Katedra anglistiky a amerikanistiky 11. ZÁŘÍ, 2001 – SVĚTOVÉ OBCHODNÍ CENTRUM Bakalářská práce VEDOUCÍ BAKALÁŘSKÉ PRÁCE: VYPRACOVALA: PhDr. Matthew Sweney, Ph.D. Halina Kudličková Olomouc 2016 PROHLÁŠENÍ: Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci na téma ‘’11. září, 2001 – Světové obchodní centrum’’ vypracovala samostatně pod odborným dohledem vedoucího práce a uvedla jsem všechny použité podklady a literaturu. V ………………. dne ………………. …………………………………… Halina Kudličková ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: For help, comments and advice with writing this bachelor thesis and for lending me relevant literature I wish to thank to PhDr. Matthew Sweney, Ph.D. I would also like to thank my friend Kateřina Janská for providing me with photos. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7 1. About the World Trade Center and the Pentagon ......................................... 8 1.1. The World Trade Center ..................................................................................... 8 1.1.1. Description of the complex ................................................................................. 8 1.1.2. The Twin Towers structure ................................................................................
[Show full text]
New York's "Unfortunate Event" Test: Its Application Prior to the Events of 9/11
California Western Law Review Volume 39 Number 2 Article 5 2003 New York's "Unfortunate Event" Test: Its Application Prior to the Events of 9/11 Jon A. Baumunk Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr Recommended Citation Baumunk, Jon A. (2003) "New York's "Unfortunate Event" Test: Its Application Prior to the Events of 9/11," California Western Law Review: Vol. 39 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol39/iss2/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Western Law Review by an authorized editor of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Baumunk: New York's "Unfortunate Event" Test: Its Application Prior to the COMMENTS NEW YORK'S "UNFORTUNATE EVENT" TEST: ITS APPLICATION PRIOR TO THE EVENTS OF 9/11 I. INTRODUCTION On the morning of September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked two airplanes from Boston's Logan Airport.' After American Airlines Flight 11 struck the North Tower of the World Trade Center,2 some employees of the investment banking and brokerage firm, Keefe Bruyette & Woods, ran to the windows of the firn's headquarters in the South Tower.' The co-CEO emerged from his office and exclaimed, "[wihat the hell was that?"4 The traders, however, remained at their desks;5 some even chided those who abandoned their com- puter screens to see what happened.6 Shortly thereafter, United Airlines Flight 175 struck close to the top of the
[Show full text]
The Emergency Response Operations
NISTNCSTAR1-8 Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster The Emergency Response Operations J. Randall Lawson Robert L. Vettori Natiohal Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Adminlslrollon • U.S. Deportment of Commerce NISTNCSTAR1-8 Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster The Emergency Response Operations J. Randall Lawson Robert L. Vettori Building and Fire Researcti Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology September 2005 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary Technology Administration Michelle O'Neill, Acting Under Secretary for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology William Jeffrey, Director Disclaimer No. 1 Certain commercial entities, equipment, products, or materials are identified in this document in order to describe a procedure or concept adequately or to trace tlie liistory of the procedures and practices used. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation, endorsement, or implication that the entities, products, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Nor does such identification imply a finding of fault or negligence by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Disclaimer No. 2 The policy of NIST is to use the International System of Units (metric units) in all publications. In this document, however, units are presented in metric units or the inch-pound system, whichever is prevalent in the discipline. Disclaimer No. 3 Pursuant to section 7 of the National Construction Safety Team Act, the NIST Director has determined that certain evidence received by NIST in the course of this Investigation is "voluntarily provided safety-related information" that is "not directly related to the building failure being investigated" and that "disclosure of that information would inhibit the voluntary provision of that type of information" (15 USC 7306c).
[Show full text]
1 WORLD TRADE CENTER LLC, Et Al
New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal -----------------------------------------------------------x : In the Matter of : : DECISION 1 WORLD TRADE CENTER LLC, et al. : : TAT (E) 07-34(CR), et al. Petitioners. : : : -----------------------------------------------------------x The Commissioner of Finance of the City of New York (“Respondent”) filed an Exception to a Determination of an Administrative Law Judge (the “ALJ”) dated December 3, 2009 (the “ALJ Determination”). The ALJ Determination cancelled Notices of Determination issued by the New York City Department of Finance (the “Department”) that asserted New York City Commercial Rent Tax (“CRT”) deficiencies against 1 World Trade Center LLC, 2 World Trade Center LLC, 4 World Trade Center LLC and 5 World Trade Center LLC, now known as 3 World Trade Center LLC, (collectively “Petitioners” or the “Silverstein Lessees”) for the 12-month CRT tax years beginning June 1, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 (the “Tax Years”). Petitioners filed a Cross-Exception to the ALJ Determination (“Petitioners’ Cross-Exception”). Petitioners appeared by Elliot Pisem, Esq. and Joseph Lipari, Esq. of Roberts & Holland LLP. Respondent appeared by Frances J. Henn, Esq., Senior Corporation Counsel, and Joshua M. Wolf, Esq., Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York City Law Department. The Parties filed briefs and oral argument was held before this Tribunal. Each of the Silverstein Lessees entered into an Agreement of Lease with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the “Port Authority”) dated as of July 16, 2001, having a term of 99 years (individually a “Lease” and collectively the “Leases”).1 Each Lease related to one of four buildings, respectively known as “One World Trade Center,” “Two World Trade Center,” “Four World Trade Center” and “Five World Trade Center” (the “Buildings”).
[Show full text]
Request for Proposals for Site 5 World Trade Center (“RFP”) Addendum #3
Request for Proposals for Site 5 World Trade Center (“RFP”) Addendum #3 Release Date: August 16, 2019 Please see below for additional items relating to the Site 5 World Trade Center RFP. A copy of the RFP is available here. All capitalized terms used below and not otherwise defined in this addendum will have the meanings set forth in the RFP. 1) Additional Site 5 World Trade Center RFP Site Visit Attendees The attendee list for the July 22, 2019 Site 5 Information Session and Site Visit posted in Addendum 2 (link) has been updated to reflect an additional attendee. 2) Additional Site 5 Documents: As outlined in the below responses to RFP Inquiries, additional supporting documents for Site 5 are being made available as part of this addendum. These documents include: • World Trade Center Commercial Design Guidelines (“CDGs”) (see Appendix G on the Shared Drive) and Agreement between City of New York and The Port Authority for administration of CDGs (link) • 130 Liberty Street Deconstruction Plan Documents (“Demolition File”) (link) • WTC Lot 1 Block 54 Survey (“Survey”) (see Appendix H on the Shared Drive) • Ground level drawing from the WTC Master Plan Version 11, dated October 10, 2013 (see Appendix I on the Shared Drive) • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Spill Reports (see Appendix J on the Shared Drive) • Liberty Park Plan (see Appendix K on the Shared Drive) • Updated “Schedule B” for MWBE Participation (see Appendix L on the Shared Drive) Respondents are also advised that a link to the The World Trade Center Memorial and Redevelopment Plan Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (“FGEIS”), Record of Decision and Findings Statement can be found in footnote 3 on page 8 of the RFP.
[Show full text]
1.Introduction
1.Introduction The original idea for a world trade center in New York is generally credited to David Rockefeller, one of industrialist John D. Rockefeller's many grandsons. In fact, the idea was proposed soon after World War II, a decade before Rockefeller ever got involved, but he was the one who actually got the ball rolling. In the 1950s and '60s, while serving as chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, Rockefeller was dedicated to revitalizing lower Manhattan. He hoped to energize the area with new construction, in much the same way his father revitalized midtown Manhattan in the 1930s with Rockefeller Center. As part of his plan, David Rockefeller proposed a complex dedicated to international trade, to be constructed at the east end of Wall Street. Rockefeller believed that the trade center, which would include office and hotel space, an exhibit hall, a securities and exchange center and numerous shops, would be just the thing to spur economic growth in the area. The original World Trade Center featured landmark twin towers(1 WTC and 2 WTC), which opened on April 4, 1973. The North Tower (left), with antenna spire, is 1 WTC. The South Tower (right) is 2 WTC 33 2.Contruction of the World Trade Center The construction of the World Trade Center was conceived as an urban renewal project, spearheaded by David Rockefeller, to help revitalize Lower Manhattan. On September 20, 1962, the Port Authority announced the selection of Minoru Yamasaki as lead architect, and Emery Roth & Sons as associate architects. Originally, Yamasaki submitted to the Port Authority a concept incorporating twin towers, but with each building only 80 stories tall.
[Show full text]
DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK Electronicaily FILED
USDCSDNY . DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECtRONICAILY FILED --............--.---.-.--••••••- •• - •••--- •• --.---••••• --•• - x DOC #: - __"'!":'"::-;-t;;,~ IN RE SEPTEMBER II LITIGATION DATEFU..ED: q /Q.3i'2Dll ----..-.----..------.•---.--.---.------.•-.---..---.------ x AEGIS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.; LIBERY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC. (As to the First through Tenth Causes ofAction); NATIONAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER AND OPINION OF pmSBURGH; NUCLEAR ELECTRIC GRANTING MOTIONS FOR INSURANCE LIMITED; CERTAIN SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, (SYNDICATE DEFENDANTS 7 WORLD 1225): aJslo CONSOLIDATED EDISION TRADE COMPANY AND COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. and CITIGROUP CONSOILDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., 21 MC 101 (AKH) Plaintiffs, 04 Civ. 7272 -against 7 WORLD TRADE COMPANY, L.P.; SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES, INC.; CITIGROUP, INC.; SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HOLDINGS, INC.; SALOMON INC.; SWANKE HAYDEN CONNELL ARCHITECTS; : AMBASSADOR CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.; COSENTINI ASSOCIATES INC.; CANTOR SEINUK GROUP, P.C.; OFFICE OF IRWIN G. CANTOR, P.C.; B.O. PENN MACHINERY CO., INC.; KABACK ENTERPRISES; PREFERRED UTILITIES MANUFACTURING CORP.; ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.; AMERICAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; G.C. ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES, P.C.; TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; FIRECOM INC.; GRACE CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS; FIBERLOCK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; EMERY ROTH & SON, P.C.; SYSKA & HENNESSY ENGINEERS; SKIDMORE OWINGS AND MERRILL, L.L.P.; FLACK & KURTZ, INC.; ABCO PEERLESS SPRINKLER CORPORATION; AMEC PLC FORMERLY KNOWN AS MORSE DIESEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.; CENTIFUGAL ASSOCIATES, INC.; AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.; UAL : CORPORATION; UNITED AIRLINES, INC.; : COLGAN AIR, INC.; US AIRWAYS GROUP, : INC.; US AIRWAYS, INC.; HUNTLEIGH USA : CORPORATION; ICTS INTERNATIONAL NV; : GLOBE AVIATION SERVICES : CORPORATION; BURNS INTERNATIONAL : SECURITY SERVICES CORPORATION; : PINKERTON’S INC.; SECURITAS AB; : BOEING CO., : : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------------- x ALVIN K.
[Show full text]
1 World Trade Center LLC, Et Al
NEW YORK CITY TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION : In the Matter of the Petition : DETERMINATION : of : : TAT(H)07-34(CR), et al. 1 World Trade Center LLC, et al. : : Schwartz, A.L.J.: Petitioners, 1 World Trade Center LLC, 2 World Trade Center LLC, 4 World Trade Center LLC and 5 World Trade Center LLC (now known as 3 World Trade Center LLC) (“Petitioners” or the “Silverstein Lessees”) filed Petitions for Hearing with the New York City (“City”) Tax Appeals Tribunal (“Tribunal”) seeking redeterminations of deficiencies of City Commercial Rent Tax (“CRT”) under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the City Administrative Code (“Code”) for the five tax years beginning June 1, 2001 and ending May 31, 2006 (“Tax Years”). A hearing was held and various documents were admitted into evidence. Petitioners were represented by Elliot Pisem, Esq. and Joseph Lipari, Esq. of Roberts & Holland LLP. The Commissioner of Finance (“Respondent” or “Commissioner”) was represented by Frances J. Henn, Esq., Senior Counsel of the City’s Law Department. Joshua M. Wolf, Esq., Assistant Corporation Counsel, participated on Respondent’s briefs. Both parties filed briefs and reply briefs. CONCLUSIONS The payments made by Silverstein Lessees to the Port Authority after September 11, 2001 did not constitute base rent paid for taxable premises because the Silverstein Lessees no longer had the right to occupy specific space after the government takeover of the World Trade Center site on September 11, 2001. Thus, the Commercial Rent Tax does not apply to those payments. FINDINGS OF FACT The Silverstein Lessees and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the “Port Authority”) executed four Agreements of Lease (the “Leases”), dated as of July 16, 2001, each for a term of 99 years.
[Show full text]