Analyst-Patient Interaction, Were Not Without Very Large Political and Institutional Effects, Which Form Their Backdrop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analyst-Patient Interaction, Were Not Without Very Large Political and Institutional Effects, Which Form Their Backdrop Analyst—Patient Interaction Collected Papers on Technique Michael Fordham Edited by Sonu Shamdasani London and New York First published 1996 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1996 the Estate of Dr Michael Fordham, Sonu Shamdasani All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book has been requested ISBN 0-203-36019-2 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-37275-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-12184-1 (Print Edition) Contents Introduction 1 Sonu Shamdasani 1 Notes on the transference (1957) 12 2 Counter-transference (1960) 41 3 Suggestions towards a theory of supervision (1961) 49 4 Reply to Dr Edinger (1961) 57 5 A comment on James Hillman’s papers (1962) 59 6 Problems of a training analyst (undated) 62 7 Reflections on training analysis (1968) 73 8 Technique and counter-transference (1969) 84 9 Reply to Plaut’s ‘Comment’ (1970) 105 10 The interrelation between patient and therapist (1972) 109 11 Jung’s conception of transference (1974) 113 12 Defences of the self (1974) 138 13 Analyst—patient interaction (1975) 146 14 Discussion of Thomas B.Kirsch, ‘The practice of multiple 155 analysis in analytical psychology’ (1976) 15 Analytical psychology and counter-transference (1979) 159 16 Contribution to symposium ‘How do I assess progress in 175 supervision?’ (1982) 17 How I do analysis (1988) 178 18 Fordham’s rejoinder to Spiegelman’s comments (1988) 184 19 The supposed limits of interpretation (1991) 186 20 Rejoinder to Nathan Schwartz-Salant (1991) 195 21 On not knowing beforehand (1993) 197 iv Sources 205 Bibliography 207 Index 213 Introduction Sonu Shamdasani It would not surprise many people if the Collected Papers on Technique of an analyst who started practising in the days before established training might have little interest today, in an age of increasing professionalisation and state legitimation. For those contemporary clinicians for whom the invention of new conceptual nomenclature spells more than the history of the field, such a volume might simply seem to indicate developmental positions that have long been superseded. That such is not the case stems not only from the significance of the transformation of practice and the new lines of theoretical articulations that these papers opened, but also from the clearsighted way in which they raise controversial issues and problematics that are by no means stilled. All the less reason, then, to be assured that one can skip over these papers in the belief that what is of value in them has already been assimilated and augmented in subsequent work by others. The controversies that still surround Michael Fordham’s writings on technique attest to their significance. What makes them essential reading, irrespective of whether one agrees with their conclusions—and anyone who knows him will be familiar with the way he continually questions and reworks his previous conclusions—is that they have staked out inescapable markers in this field. The papers themselves provide their best introduction and overview, particularly as the recapitulation of his previous views on topics to set the contours of new problematics is a rhetorical form that Fordham favours. Given this, I will leave my remarks here to marginal comments—rather than give a schematic account which is in some respects superfluous, and which would be hard placed to do justice to the careful and intricate elucidation, which is their strength. Jung’s work left an ambiguous legacy for his followers. Amongst the problematic issues that he raised for the ‘practice of psychotherapy’, to use the title of the relevant volume of his Collected Works, are the following: the relations between culture and therapy, between technique and spontaneity in practice, between ‘reductive’ and ‘synthetic’ methods in analysis; issues concerning individuation and the ends of analysis, democratic and aristocratic views of the suitability of different types of analysis; questions on the very possibility of technique, clinical theory, and the validity of diagnosis; theses on the merits of the use of the ‘chair’ as opposed to the ‘couch’; the differences between free association, types of interpretation and active imagination—and all these shot through with an unabated mimetic rivalry in 2 INTRODUCTION relation to Freud and psycho-analysis. It is important to note that one of the main areas of contention between Jung and Freud was the question of technique: for the theoretical modifications that Jung was introducing were leading to a changed conception of analytic technique. At the same time classical psychoanalytic technique was not simply rejected by Jung, but pragmatically relativised within a more pluralistic conception of therapy. Jung was always interested in cases that were at the borders of what was considered analysable, as witnessed, for instance, by his early work with schizophrenia. His technical modifications may be seen to stem from problems posed by cases traditionally regarded as recalcitrant to what was being formulated as classical psychoanalytic technique—such as, ‘psychotic’, ‘borderline’ and elderly patients. For instance, in 1926 in ‘The relations between the ego and the unconscious’ (Jung, 1928, p. 130) Jung claimed that classical psychoanalytic technique was completely at a loss when it came to dealing with the problems posed by what he termed the archetypal transference—when larger than life images, such as that of saviours and devils, are projected onto the analyst. This was because for Jung such images did not have an ‘origin’ in a parental prototype, to which they could be traced back. He claimed that this explained numerous failures and relapses in psychoanalysis. His formulation of supplementary techniques, such as the synthetic method of interpretation, amplification and active imagination, were attempts to deal with such instances. It was primarily Fordham who inherited and took on these aspects of Jung’s estate, and who attempted to evaluate the clinical relevance of these technical innovations. This aspect of the transmission of the responsibility for clinical research is movingly brought out in one of Jung’s letters to Fordham, on the topic of children’s dreams, on which Jung lectured to his seminar group (Jung, 1987). Jung wrote: As I told you I know that it is a pity that I never found the time to do more work on children’s ‘great’ dreams, but I’m afraid that if I should tackle such a job I would have to do it in a thorough way and for that purpose I would have to elaborate on a much bigger material. This task is definitely too much for me. I cannot think of beginning anything of such a kind as long as I’m not through with the work in hand, namely the Mysterium Coniunctionis. And what with my correspondence and all sorts of urgent things cropping up continually I just cannot see my way to anything so ambitious as a book about children’s dreams. This would really be your province and I should like to persuade you to try your hand on such material. You are welcome to my material and I think you are in a position to add more to it. If you try it you will see that it is no easy thing, but tremendously interesting. For a time I was utterly fascinated by the beauty and profundity of such early childhood dreams. There I observed some of the best examples of autochthonous reconstructions of archetypal ideas. Through your careful investigations of my books you have acquired enough orientation over the already existing material INTRODUCTION 3 that could assist you in a thorough examination of children’s dreams. For most of their collective symbolism you would have the amplifying material ready-made. I’m now at an age when it becomes unwise to continue the great adventure of pioneering research. I must leave the joy and the despair of it to younger forces. (Jung to Fordham, February 22nd, 1952, private possession, Michael Fordham)1 When Fordham wrote his first papers on technique, it was not only the positions he took that aroused controversy in the Jungian world, but also whether technique was a subject that could be studied. In his Bailey Island seminar in 1936, whilst discussing the reasons why he felt that it was important for an individual to have an analyst of both sexes, Jung said: but these are technical problems. I could give you a whole book about these peculiar technical secrets, but I cannot go into all that. (Jung, 1936, p. 156) For the classical school of Jungian analysis, these lacunae were made into a virtue. What Jung had not formulated was regarded as unformulatable. Further, it was claimed that the effects of formulations of technique would restrict the essential uniqueness of the analytic encounter. Fordham contested the representation of Jung’s position that was used to support these claims. He further felt that this tendency had resulted in making analytical psychology into a quasi-religious cult, which he found unacceptable. He writes that his book The Objective Psyche (1958) was in part written to combat this tendency (Fordham, 1985, p.
Recommended publications
  • Freud, Jung, Klein—The Fenceless Field Freud, Jung, Klein— the Fenceless Field
    Freud, Jung, Klein—the fenceless field Freud, Jung, Klein— the fenceless field Essays on psychoanalysis and analytical psychology Michael Fordham Edited by Roger Hobdell London and New York First published 1995 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 First published in paperback 1998 Editor’s introduction, editorial matter and selection © 1995 Roger Hobdell; Introduction to Part I and Chapters 1, 2 and 3 © 1995 Michael Fordham; Chapter 4 and ‘An appreciation of C.G.Jung’s Answer to Job’ in Chapter 12 © British Journal of Medical Psychology; ‘Review of Jacobson’s The Self and the Object World’ in Chapter 10 © International Journal of Psychoanalysis; ‘A tribute to D.W.Winnicott’ in Chapter 10 © The Scientific Bulletin of the British Psychoanalytical Society; all other papers and reviews © Journal of Analytical Psychology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by an electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Jung, New York, 1912 Sonu Shamdasani
    Copyrighted Material IntroductIon: Jung, neW York, 1912 Sonu Shamdasani September 28, 1912. the New York Times featured a full-page inter- view with Jung on the problems confronting america, with a por- trait photo entitled “america facing Its Most tragic Moment”— the first prominent feature of psychoanalysis in the Times. It was Jung, the Times correctly reported, who “brought dr. freud to the recognition of the older school of psychology.” the Times went on to say, “[H]is classrooms are crowded with students eager to under- stand what seems to many to be an almost miraculous treatment. His clinics are crowded with medical cases which have baffled other doctors, and he is here in america to lecture on his subject.” Jung was the man of the hour. aged thirty-seven, he had just com- pleted a five-hundred-page magnum opus, Transformations and Sym‑ bols of the Libido, the second installment of which had just appeared in print. following his first visit to america in 1909, it was he, and not freud, who had been invited back by Smith ely Jelliffe to lec- ture on psychoanalysis in the new international extension course in medicine at fordham university, where he would also be awarded his second honorary degree (others invited included the psychiatrist William alanson White and the neurologist Henry Head). Jung’s initial title for his lectures was “Mental Mechanisms in Health and disease.” By the time he got to composing them, the title had become simply “the theory of Psychoanalysis.” Jung com- menced his introduction to the lectures by indicating that he in- tended to outline his attitude to freud’s guiding principles, noting that a reader would likely react with astonishment that it had taken him ten years to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRTH, DEATH and BEYOND MELISSA JANE MIDGEN a Thesis Su
    THE CHILD ANALYTIC TRADITION OF THE SOCIETY OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY – BIRTH, DEATH AND BEYOND MELISSA JANE MIDGEN A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of East London for the degree of Professional Doctorate in Child Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy December 2016 i Abstract This thesis seeks to chart the creation, development and eventual demise of the child analytic training of The Society of Analytical Psychology (SAP), the foremost Jungian Society in the UK. The brainchild of the Society’s founding director, Michael Fordham, the creation of the child training drew on the talents and persistence of many committed individuals. Through oral history interviews and archival research I weave together a narrative that will serve as testament to this achievement and offer first hand recollections for posterity. Through these sources the narrative also explores the difficulties that the training faced and which ultimately led to its eventual demise. Additionally I interrogate the current status of this tradition of child analysis and ask the question whether or not the tradition continues to exist and if so in what ways; I conclude that currently the tradition can only be said to exist in an attenuated form and that the future is bleak. In the course of the thesis I locate the SAP training within the development more generally of child analytic provision within the UK, the relationship of that to the child guidance movement and to the psychoanalytic diaspora, which made it possible. I describe the current obstacles faced by the child psychotherapy discipline as well as psychoanalytic psychotherapy in the NHS.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Consumer Research
    ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH Labovitz School of Business & Economics, University of Minnesota Duluth, 11 E. Superior Street, Suite 210, Duluth, MN 55802 What Do They Say About “Friends”? Jyh-Shen Chiou, National Chengchi University Jasi Lee, Proctor & Gamble What Do They Say About “Friends”?Jyh-Shen Chiou, National Chengchi UniversityJasi Lee, Proctor & GambleAbstractThis exploratory study is to analyze the impact of the popular US TV program Friends on Internet communication in the US, Japan, and Taiwan. It intends to establish whether exposure to foreign TV could lead to similar communication content in the context of the virtual community between exporting and importing societies. Content analysis was used in this cross-cultural study. The results of this exploratory study support the notion that the process of cultural value influence is more complex than Cultural Imperialism advocates propose. Audiences respond actively rather than passively to foreign TV programs. Prior information structure of the audience is affecting the interpretation of subsequent information. [to cite]: Jyh-Shen Chiou and Jasi Lee (2006) ,"What Do They Say About “Friends”?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33, eds. Connie Pechmann and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 161-174. [url]: http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/12422/volumes/v33/NA-33 [copyright notice]: This work is copyrighted by The Association for Consumer Research. For permission to copy or use this work in whole or in part, please contact
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of WITNESS SEMINAR FINAL 2009
    WITNESS SEMINAR CENTRE FOR THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY FROM 1960 UNTIL 1990 12 May 2009 Organisers Emeritus Professor Philip Graham, Institute of Child Health, London Dr Malcolm Nicolson, Director, Centre for the History of Medicine, University of Glasgow Editors Philip Graham Helen Minnis Malcolm Nicolson Copy Editor David Sutton Contents Introduction 1 Seminar Programme 3 Transcript of Proceedings 4 Reflections 106 List of Participants 110 Appendix: Biographical Information 111 Front row: Ian Berg, Dora Black, Lionel Hersov, Bryan Lask, Philip Graham Second row: Arnon Bentovim, William Yule, Sebastian Kraemer Back row: Bob Jezzard, Michael Rutter, Malcolm Nicolson, Hugh Morton Introduction Philip Graham, Emeritus Professor of Child Psychiatry, Institute of Child Health, London The specialty of child and adolescent psychiatry began in Britain in the 1920s. 1 The period from the 1960s to the present time has been exceptionally rapid both in academic and service development. We decided that a project was needed to capture the oral history memories of some of those who participated in the earlier part of this period from 1960 to 1990. Witness seminars are features of academic contemporary history research, and have for several years been used in the exploration of medical history by the Wellcome Trust at University College London. 2 Our seminar was hosted by the Centre for the History of Medicine at the University of Glasgow in May 2009. “Witnesses” were selected on the basis of their contributions to different spheres of the specialty. Because of time constraints it was not possible to invite all of those who had played a significant part.
    [Show full text]
  • The Margaret Lowenfeld Archive Largely Consists of Material Relevant to the Life and Work of the Child Psychiatrist, Dr Margaret Lowenfeld, 1890-1973
    The Margaret Lowenfeld archive largely consists of material relevant to the life and work of the Child Psychiatrist, Dr Margaret Lowenfeld, 1890-1973. It also contains much that is relevant to the history of child psychiatry, paediatrics and child guidance as a whole. The material is organised on the basis of a coding scheme developed from a system originally designed by Ville Andersen, Margaret Lowenfeld’s colleague in research and clinical work from the 1950s until Margaret Lowenfeld’s death. When Ville Andersen herself died in 1986, further material was made available. We are also grateful to friends and colleagues of the late Kate MacSorley, clinical psychologist at the Institute of Child Psychology from the mid nineteen sixties, for placing photographs, clinical records and research material with the archive. Particular thanks are due to Elaine Sharland for sorting through unclassified material. We have not been able to identify or date accurately all the material contained in the archive. Visitors to the archive may be able to provide further information. If so, they are asked to supply the librarian with a wording for an entry to the catalogue which is consistent with the existing scheme. Cathy Urwin, Margaret Lowenfeld Research Fellow, 1981-1990 Sally Roberts, Librarian to the Centre for Family Research Margaret Lowenfeld Archive Catalogue Copies of papers included in Boxes A-D may be found in the Centre for Family Research Library, and are available for general use. The contents of Boxes E-Z are available on a application to the Librarian, and may not be removed from the library.
    [Show full text]
  • C. G. Jung Center Library Catalog by Author Types: R=Reference O=Oversize M=Member Section
    C. G. Jung Center Library Catalog by Author Types: R=Reference O=Oversize M=Member Section PRINT TITLE AUTHOR COPY # PUBLISHER Bolligen TYPE Series YEAR History of Mysticism Abhayanarch, S. Atma Books 1996 M Reclaiming the Inner Child Abrams, Jeremiah, ed. Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc. 1990 M Shadow in America, The Abrams, Jeremiah, ed. Nataraj Publishing 1994 M Natural History of the Senses, A Ackerman, Diane Vintage Books 1991 M Natural History of the Senses Ackerman, Diane * CE Random House 1990 M Art as Healing Adamson, Edward Nicholas-Hays Inc. 1984 M Living Symbol, The Adler, Gerhard Pantheon Books x 1961 M Studies in Analytical Psychology Adler, Gerhard 1 G. P. Putnam's Sons 1966 M Studies in Analytical Psychology Adler, Gerhard 2 G. P. Putnam's Sons 1966 M Current Trends in Analytical Psychology Adler, Gerhard, ed. Tavistock Publications 1961 M Success and Failure in Analysis Adler, Gerhard, ed. G. P. Putnam's Sons 1974 M Drawing Down the Moon Adler, Margot Beacon Press 1979 M Russian Fairy Tales Afanas'ev, Aleksandr Pantheon Books 1973 M Inscapes of the Child's World Allan, John Spring Publications, Inc. 1988 M Sacred Hoop, The Allen, Paula Gunn Beacon Press 1986 M Green Man Anderson, William HarperCollins 1990 M Mandala Arguelles, Jose and Miriam Shambhala Publications 1972 M Saint Francis: Nature Mystic Armstrong, Edward Univ of Calif Press 1973 M Jungian Psychology Resource Guide, A Arraj, James and Tyra Tools for Inner Grow 1987 M Abandoned Child Within, The Asper, Kathrin Fromm International 1987 M Inner Child in Dreams, The Asper, Kathrin Shambhala Publications 1988 M Michael Fordham: Innovations in Analytical Psychology Astor, James Rutledge Books, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Jung and Analytical Psychology 2009
    ROUTLEDGE MENTAL HEALTH Jung and Analytical Psychology 2009 NEW BOOKS AND SELECTED BACKLIST JUNG AND FILM New! how key trickster-infused sites of transition reflect the psychological fragility of their willing and unwilling occupants. In differing ways, the Film After Jung selected texts – Deadwood, Grizzly Man, Lost, Solaris, The Biggest Loser, Amores Perros and Repulsion – all play with inner and outer marginality. Post-Jungian Approaches As this study demonstrates, the dramatic potential of transition is not to Film Theory always geared toward resolution. Prolonging the anxiety of change is Greg Singh, Buckinghamshire New an increasingly popular option. Trickster moves within this wildness University, UK and instability to agitate a form of dialogue between conscious and unconscious processes. “You will find this book indispensable. Not only does Greg Singh share his comprehensive grasp Waddell’s imaginative interpretation of screen material and her of theorists from both sides... but he makes original positioning of trickster, will inspire students of media, cinema, more of each of them through his inter-textual gender and Jungian studies, as well as academics with an interest in the application of Post-Jungian ideas to screen culture. discoveries which take Jungian film theorising to a brand new level.” - Christopher Hauke, From the Foreword ContEnts: Introduction. Verging on Wildness: Liminality and Trickster. From the Slime to the Scream: Pigs, Whores and Random Acts of Soiling – Deadwood. Popular film as a medium of communication, expression and Channelling the ‘Inner Warrior’: Bear Whispering as an Extreme Sport – Grizzly storytelling has proved one of the most durable and fascinating Man. Waiting for Godonlyknows: The Island with Agency – Lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Fordham, Jung and the Self: a Re-Examination of Fordham's Contribution to Jung's Conceptualization of the Self
    Journal of Analytical Psychology, 2005, 50, 571–594 Fordham, Jung and the self: a re-examination of Fordham’s contribution to Jung’s conceptualization of the self Elizabeth Urban, London Abstract: This paper is about Fordham’s contribution to Jung’s studies on the self. It opens with the epistemological dilemmas inherent in the subject, before moving on to an account of Fordham’s research into the incompatible ways Jung used the term ‘self’. There is a description of Fordham’s model, which covers his concepts of the primary self, deintegration, reintegration, self objects, self representations, and individuation in infancy. There is a section which discusses areas in which Fordham apparently diverged from Jung, including how these were reconciled by Fordham’s developmental approach. These areas include the definition of the self as totality or archetype, the mind-body relationship, the ‘ultimate’, the origins of the archetypes, and the primary self, the self and the sense of self. It concludes with an extension to Fordham’s outline of a resolution to Jung’s incompatible definitions. This draws upon the concept of the central archetype of order and how its unfolding is evidenced towards the end of the first year of infancy. Key words: archetypes, central archetype of order, deintegration, infant development, Michael Fordham, primary self, reintegration, self representations. This paper is about Fordham’s contribution to Jung’s studies on the self. He was well aware that the self is a ‘special case’ because the subject studying is also the object studied and, moreover, that the observing ego is only a part of the total subject of investigation: ‘...a concept of the totality is particularly difficult to construct’, he noted; ‘Indeed it is impossible’ (Fordham 1985, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Enchantment
    “The future has an ancient heart” CARLO LEVI Pari Perspectives Ideas in Science, the Arts, Spirit and Community Issue 1 / September 2019 Re-enchanting the World Friends of the Pari Center Pari Perspec- Religion tives is a quar- Spirituality By becoming a Friend of the Pari Center you will continue to terly journal Society receive the Pari Center quarterly journal Pari Perspectives. published Psychology We know many of you would like to become more involved annually in Language in supporting the work of the Pari Center. By taking out a September, The Arts membership at a cost of 30 euros per annum (from the date December, of purchase) you will be allowing our not-for-profit organi- March and For our guidelines contact zation to continue with its established projects and to start June by The us at new ventures, including this journal. Pari Center. pariperspectives@pari- center.com The Pari Perspectives journal will be free of charge to all Editors Friends. In addition, those who have purchased a member- Kristina Aleksandra ship will receive a discount on any events they may choose Janavicius to attend at the Pari Center within the year. Maureen Doolan To become a friend you can register through our website or Editorial Board in person at the Pari Center. Caroline Pawluk Eleanor Peat Your membership fee will entitle you to: James Peat Barbieri • a digital copy of the quarterly Pari Perspectives Genny Rabazzi • a 10% discount on all events at the Pari Center • access to a Members Area of our website which will Design and Layout include blogs, discussion groups, and a library of past Andrea Barbieri issues of Pari Perspectives The Pari Center Via Tozzi, 7 58045, Pari (GR) Italy Email: info@paricenter.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction by John Beebe and Ernst Falzeder
    Introduction by John Beebe and Ernst Falzeder Jung’s PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPES appeared in 1921 to widespread acclaim and received many laudatory reviews.1 In a two-page spread in the New York Times Book Review, Mark Isham concluded: “This volume is drastically serious, positive, didac- tic, classic, and yet more than stimulating. It is energizing, lib- erating and recreative. The author shows an amazingly sym- pathetic knowledge of the introvert of the thinking type, and hardly less for the other types. Jung has revealed the inner kingdom of the soul marvelously well and has made the signal discovery of the value of phantasy. His book has a manifold reach and grasp, and many reviews with quite different sub- ject matter could be written about it” (1923). Psychological Types has been one of Jung’s most infl uential and enduring works, leaving an indelible mark on psychology, psycho- therapy, personality testing, anthropology, popular culture, and even language. It was Jung’s fi rst major publication in nearly a decade since his 1911– 12 book on Transformations and Symbols of the Libido. Yet there has been little study of either its genesis and elaboration from his fi rst brief presentation on 1 Sigmund Freud was not pleased, however: “A new production by Jung of enormous size [,] 700 pages thick, inscribed ‘Psychologische Typen[,]’ the work of a snob and a mystic, no new idea in it. He clings to that escape he had de- tected in 1913, denying objective truth in psychology on account of the per- sonal differences in the observer’s constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Fordham
    Michael Fordham Michael Fordham’s immense contribution to analytical psychology has been marked by its combination of practical and theoretical genius. Before his retirement he ran a full clinical practice while concurrently developing the Society of Analytical Psychology and its child and adult training, co-editing the Collected Works of C. G. Jung and editing the Journal of Analytical Psychology for fifteen years. In his published work there has emerged a consistent and original contribution to Jungian thought, particularly in relation to the processes of individuation in childhood, and the links between analytical psychology and the work of the Kleinians. In this important addition to the series Makers of Modern Psychotherapy James Astor takes a critical and informed look at Fordham’s work and ideas. Using clinical examples to illustrate Fordham’s theories, the author evaluates key developments in his work, from his first publication in 1937 right up to the present day, and shows the fundamental ways in which it develops Jung’s theory in theory and practice. Michael Fordham: Innovations in Analytical Psychology will provide a useful amplification of Fordham’s own work for students of analytical psychology and a sound introduction to it for analysts interested in understanding the connections between post-Jungian and post-Kleinian thought. James Astor is a training analyst at the Society of Analytical Psychology in London and a member of the Association of Child Psychotherapists. The Makers of Modern Psychotherapy Series editor: Laurence Spurling This series of introductory, critical texts looks at the work and thought of key contributors to the development of psychodynamic psychotherapy.
    [Show full text]