Razia Sultana Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Razia Sultana Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Summer 2018, Part-1, Vol.12, No.1, 1-16 Landed Aristocracy of the Punjab and Partition of India Sajid Hussain Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad Razia Sultana Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar The research paper mainly deals with last decade of British rule in India with special focus on the politics of the Punjab and Landed Aristocracy as a contributory factor in partition of India. The impression that economically powerful class attain political power in every society or region so having these powers the landed aristocracy of cross communal Unionist Party (which kept three major communities united for decades in Punjab) through allegiance to All India Muslim League, has been a contributory factor in partition of India, is the major argument of this research. Had landed aristocracy of the Punjab which assumed power and became ruler in Pakistan after independence played any intentional or unintentional role or contribution in partition of India? Landed aristocracy’s role, Sikandar-Jinnah Pact of 1937, Lahore Resolution of 1940, inclination of landed aristocracy towards All India Muslim League, thirst for power, self-interest, mass pressure or economic opportunities, mutual cooperation with British ruler, political engineering by the British rulers, communal divide in the Punjab, decline of Unionist Party, Hindu, Muslim, Sikhs relationship, 1946 elections, partition of Punjab and India are main subjects of the paper. Partition of India is much debated subject but almost historians have written in broader context of overall India and the Punjab. This analytical study is important and original contribution because in this paper landed aristocracy of the Punjab has been explored as major or minor contributory factor in partition of India which earlier has not been studied by the historians specifically. This paper highlights this unique subject. Keywords: landed aristocracy, the British, Punjab, Pakistan movement, partition of India After annexation of the Punjab in 1849, the British realized how necessary it was for them to obtain support from the landed aristocracy and nobility who were described as “break water to the storm which would otherwise have swept over them in one great wave” (Bevan, 1929). The British Government’s major objective in the Punjab was to gain revenue returns, military recruitment and political support by using landed aristocracy as the main pillars of the Raj. All the policies of the British Government revolve around their major objective of economic gains and military recruitment at any cost and for this main purpose they also needed the political support of local landed aristocracy consisting Hindus, Sikhs and Muslim landlords like Tiwanas, Noons, Mamdots, Daultanas, Legharis, Qureshis, Mazaries, Gardezis, Sials, Arains, Gilanis, Kharals, and Rajas of the Punjab to face internal and external challenges. The British used this landed aristocracy for the purpose of revenue returns, political support and military recruitment. In return, the landed aristocracy won the titles, jagirs, land free grants etc. The sole purpose of the landed aristocracy has been pronounced as self-preservation generally. Lambardars, Zaildars and some honorary Magistrates were recruited from the landed aristocracy to assist the British Government (Nina, 1985). There was a tendency on the part of the landed aristocracy to share the fruits with British by way of associating themselves with the administration. In the closing years of nineteenth century, the landed aristocracy started to seek political reforms. The administrative, social, religious and economic developments of Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mr. Sajid Hussain, PhD Candidate, Department of History, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. Email: [email protected] Hussain, Sultana 2 the nineteenth century had produced in the Punjab a wealthy landlord class and a group of financiers and opportunists. In order to build orderly rule and social stratification, the British rulers during seventeenth and eighteenth centuries created loyalist landed aristocracy in India specifically in Punjab. The landed aristocracy strengthened British rule as a tool and intermediary class and nearing the end of British rule caused a major factor in partition of India. Books and books have been written on Punjab, Indian Partition and freedom movement in the Subcontinent and they have presented varied arguments and factors behind the Indian partition in 1947. Too many articles and literature on British India have been published but they simply narrate political history explaining role and responsibilities of political organizations, local and British personalities in the partition and argument of the majority of the writers carries different perspective confusing detached spectators in understanding the real fact and truth. Almost historians have termed shifting of loyalties by the landed aristocracy from Unionist Party to AIML as factional conflict explaining less about their role as a factor in partition. Ian Talbot in his work ‘Provincial Politics and the Pakistan Movement’, David Gilmartin in his book ‘Empire and Islam’, Ayesha Jalal in ‘The Sole Spokesman’, Iftekhar H. Malik, US - South Asia Relations 1940-47: American Attitude Towards Pakistan Movement, Syed Noor Ahmad in Marshal Law to Marshal Law, Ishtiaq Ahmed in The Punjab Bloodied Partitioned and cleansed and many more writers have their argument of partition in broader context explaining overall factors and events throughout India but have little mention of landed aristocracy as a factor of partition because the Punjab, ruled by landed aristocracy, was the major canter for demand of Pakistan leading to partition of India ultimately. Switching of Landed aristocracy of Punjab from Unionist Party to League had proved last and stronger factor in Partition and almost historians have not given much importance to this factor. Hassan Javid in his work Class, Power, and Patronage: The Landed Elite and Politics in Pakistan Punjab, has given a background of landed elites but again the issues in question in this paper remain unanswered. The literature on partition and British Punjab may take pages and pages to review but all the writers and historians have paid minimum heed to a specific class and group of landed aristocracy of the Punjab whom division on communal basis caused the last blow to Indian unity and emerged as strong factor in partition of not only Punjab but the India as a whole into two separate homelands on religious lines. The division amongst Muslim, Sikh and Hindu landed aristocracy of the Punjab on religious / communal lines caused a major contributory factor of partition but all the literature on partition has not credited or discredited landed aristocracy as contributory aspect of the Indian partition as a separate subject. This paper is an attempt to decipher and highlight how landed aristocracy in Punjab influenced the overall politics to divide India into two separate countries. By 1935 Muhammad Ali Jinnah had realized the importance of Bengal and Punjab being Muslim majority provinces and by winning the support of strong Muslim leaders of these provinces the cause of All India Muslim League for wellbeing of Indian Muslims could be strengthened well. As regarded the Punjab Jinnah and Sir Fazl-e-Hussain of Unionist Party could not reach an agreement despite pursuance by Jinnah because of Jinnah’s preeminence to independence while Fazl’s emphasis on opportunities provided by provincial autonomy (Ahmad, 1985). Jinnah wanted him to run the elections under the flag of Muslim League but he refused to be side tracked. He knew that by hobnobbing with the League, he would scare away the Hindus and the Sikhs. Fazl asked Jinnah therefore rather sternly to leave the Punjab to itself (Rai, 1937) After Fazl’s death on 9 July 1936, Unionist Party’s leadership shifted to Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan, a renowned landed aristocrat. Fazl-i-Hussain had complete hold on Punjab politics and Unionist Party from 1923 to 1936 despite opposition from different personalities and groups within from the party. These groups were LANDED ARISTOCRACY OF THE PUNJAB 3 striving to gain control and power but Fazl’s group was largest and strong. However he faced perpetual opposition from the League Parliamentary Board on the one hand and from Sikandar and his supporters including Sikhs and Urban Hindus on the other (Hussain, 1946). Sikandar had sympathy of strong landlords like Ahmad Yar Khan Daultana, Nawab Muzaffar Qizlbash and Mir Maqbool Mahmood and he sent Daultana to League’s session in Bombay to ensure Jinnah landed aristocracy’s support against Fazl. Raja Ghazanfar Ali Khan may be termed as political entryism in Unionist Party by Jinnah because he contributed a lot in developing relations between League and Unionist party. Raja Ghazanfar Ali Khan, a close companion of Jinnah could be suspected as such political strategy. Sikandar’s group of landed aristocracy approached Jinnah through Raja and assured its support in coming provincial elections in Punjab in December 1934 (Mashriq, 1963). A turning point in the history of Indian partition was Jinnah – Sikandar Pact in October 1937 which actually weakened the ideological and political bases of cross communal Unionist Party and caused strengthening of purely communal AIML (Hussain, 1946). According to this pact, in Punjab a meeting of Unionist Party by Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan will be convened to advise all Muslim members of the
Recommended publications
  • Muslim Nationalism, State Formation and Legal Representations of the Ahmadiyya Community in Pakistan
    Politics of Exclusion: Muslim Nationalism, State Formation and Legal Representations of the Ahmadiyya Community in Pakistan by Sadia Saeed A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Sociology) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor George P. Steinmetz, Chair Professor Howard A. Kimeldorf Associate Professor Fatma Muge Gocek Associate Professor Genevieve Zubrzycki Professor Mamadou Diouf, Columbia University © Sadia Saeed 2010 2 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my parents with my deepest love, respect and gratitude for the innumerable ways they have supported my work and choices. ii Acknowledgements I would like to begin by acknowledging the immense support my parents have given me every step of the way during my (near) decade in graduate school. I have dedicated this dissertation to them. My ammi and baba have always believed in my capabilities to accomplish not only this dissertation but much more in life and their words of love and encouragement have continuously given me the strength and the will to give my research my very best. My father‘s great enthusiasm for this project, his intellectual input and his practical help and advice during the fieldwork of this project have been formative to this project. I would like to thank my dissertation advisor George Steinmetz for the many engaged conversations about theory and methods, for always pushing me to take my work to the next level and above all for teaching me to recognize and avoid sloppiness, caricatures and short-cuts. It is to him that I owe my greatest intellectual debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Development, the People's Party of Pakistan and the Elections of 1970
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1973 Political development, the People's Party of Pakistan and the elections of 1970. Meenakshi Gopinath University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Gopinath, Meenakshi, "Political development, the People's Party of Pakistan and the elections of 1970." (1973). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2461. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2461 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FIVE COLLEGE DEPOSITORY POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, THE PEOPLE'S PARTY OF PAKISTAN AND THE ELECTIONS OF 1970 A Thesis Presented By Meenakshi Gopinath Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS June 1973 Political Science POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, THE PEOPLE'S PARTY OF PAKISTAN AND THE ELECTIONS OF 1970 A Thesis Presented By Meenakshi Gopinath Approved as to style and content hy: Prof. Anwar Syed (Chairman of Committee) f. Glen Gordon (Head of Department) Prof. Fred A. Kramer (Member) June 1973 ACKNOWLEDGMENT My deepest gratitude is extended to my adviser, Professor Anwar Syed, who initiated in me an interest in Pakistani poli- tics. Working with such a dedicated educator and academician was, for me, a totally enriching experience. I wish to ex- press my sincere appreciation for his invaluable suggestions, understanding and encouragement and for synthesizing so beautifully the roles of Friend, Philosopher and Guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Partition: Violence, Nationalism and History in India
    Remembering Partition: Violence, Nationalism and History in India Gyanendra Pandey CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Remembering Partition Violence, Nationalism and History in India Through an investigation of the violence that marked the partition of British India in 1947, this book analyses questions of history and mem- ory, the nationalisation of populations and their pasts, and the ways in which violent events are remembered (or forgotten) in order to en- sure the unity of the collective subject – community or nation. Stressing the continuous entanglement of ‘event’ and ‘interpretation’, the author emphasises both the enormity of the violence of 1947 and its shifting meanings and contours. The book provides a sustained critique of the procedures of history-writing and nationalist myth-making on the ques- tion of violence, and examines how local forms of sociality are consti- tuted and reconstituted by the experience and representation of violent events. It concludes with a comment on the different kinds of political community that may still be imagined even in the wake of Partition and events like it. GYANENDRA PANDEY is Professor of Anthropology and History at Johns Hopkins University. He was a founder member of the Subaltern Studies group and is the author of many publications including The Con- struction of Communalism in Colonial North India (1990) and, as editor, Hindus and Others: the Question of Identity in India Today (1993). This page intentionally left blank Contemporary South Asia 7 Editorial board Jan Breman, G.P. Hawthorn, Ayesha Jalal, Patricia Jeffery, Atul Kohli Contemporary South Asia has been established to publish books on the politics, society and culture of South Asia since 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Who in Pakistan & Who Is Who in the World Study Material
    1 Who is Who in Pakistan Lists of Government Officials (former & current) Governor Generals of Pakistan: Sr. # Name Assumed Office Left Office 1 Muhammad Ali Jinnah 15 August 1947 11 September 1948 (died in office) 2 Sir Khawaja Nazimuddin September 1948 October 1951 3 Sir Ghulam Muhammad October 1951 August 1955 4 Iskander Mirza August 1955 (Acting) March 1956 October 1955 (full-time) First Cabinet of Pakistan: Pakistan came into being on August 14, 1947. Its first Governor General was Muhammad Ali Jinnah and First Prime Minister was Liaqat Ali Khan. Following is the list of the first cabinet of Pakistan. Sr. Name of Minister Ministry 1. Liaqat Ali Khan Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, Defence Minister, Minister for Commonwealth relations 2. Malik Ghulam Muhammad Finance Minister 3. Ibrahim Ismail Chundrigar Minister of trade , Industries & Construction 4. *Raja Ghuzanfar Ali Minister for Food, Agriculture, and Health 5. Sardar Abdul Rab Nishtar Transport, Communication Minister 6. Fazal-ul-Rehman Minister Interior, Education, and Information 7. Jogendra Nath Mandal Minister for Law & Labour *Raja Ghuzanfar’s portfolio was changed to Minister of Evacuee and Refugee Rehabilitation and the ministry for food and agriculture was given to Abdul Satar Pirzada • The first Chief Minister of Punjab was Nawab Iftikhar. • The first Chief Minister of NWFP was Abdul Qayum Khan. • The First Chief Minister of Sindh was Muhamad Ayub Khuro. • The First Chief Minister of Balochistan was Ataullah Mengal (1 May 1972), Balochistan acquired the status of the province in 1970. List of Former Prime Ministers of Pakistan 1. Liaquat Ali Khan (1896 – 1951) In Office: 14 August 1947 – 16 October 1951 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining the Role of Mian Muhamad Mumtaz Daultana in Colonial and Post-Colonial Punjab
    Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan Volume No. 57, Issue No. 1 (January – June, 2020) Farzanda Aslam * Muhamad Iqbal Chawla ** Zabir Saeed *** Moazzam Wasti **** Forgotten soldier of Pakistan Movement: Reimagining the role of Mian Muhamad Mumtaz Daultana in Colonial and Post-colonial Punjab Abstract Plethora of works have been produced on the colonial and post-colonial history of the Punjab but the role of Mian Muhammad Mumtaz Daultana has been academically overnighted by the historians to date and this paper intends to address it. He was an important leader of the Punjab who remained committed to the Pakistan movement, remained loyal and worked hard under the leadership of Quaid-i-Azam in the creation and consolidation of Pakistan. He was president of the Punjab Muslim League and also the first chief Minister of Pakistani Punjab. Therefore it is of immense importance to understand the role of Mian Muhammad Mumtaz Daultana in the creation and consolidation of Pakistan in the light of primary and secondary sources. Before the inception of Pakistan, his father Ahmad Yar Daultana was a popular politician from the Daultana family in the Punjab region. His house was the focal point for important political activities. Daultana was selected by Quaid-i- Azam to contend on behalf of the Muslim League against the Unionist Party because this party was not in favour of the Muslim League, by looking for the certainty of the Mumtaz Daultana, Quaid-i-Azam made him the individual from the member of Direct-action committee. The other member of the committee was ministers of the Muslim League s’ parliamentary and interim government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Calcutta Killings Noakhali Genocide
    1946 : THE GREAT CALCUTTA KILLINGS AND NOAKHALI GENOCIDE 1946 : THE GREAT CALCUTTA KILLINGS AND NOAKHALI GENOCIDE A HISTORICAL STUDY DINESH CHANDRA SINHA : ASHOK DASGUPTA No part of this publication can be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the author and the publisher. Published by Sri Himansu Maity 3B, Dinabandhu Lane Kolkata-700006 Edition First, 2011 Price ` 500.00 (Rupees Five Hundred Only) US $25 (US Dollars Twenty Five Only) © Reserved Printed at Mahamaya Press & Binding, Kolkata Available at Tuhina Prakashani 12/C, Bankim Chatterjee Street Kolkata-700073 Dedication In memory of those insatiate souls who had fallen victims to the swords and bullets of the protagonist of partition and Pakistan; and also those who had to undergo unparalleled brutality and humility and then forcibly uprooted from ancestral hearth and home. PREFACE What prompted us in writing this Book. As the saying goes, truth is the first casualty of war; so is true history, the first casualty of India’s struggle for independence. We, the Hindus of Bengal happen to be one of the worst victims of Islamic intolerance in the world. Bengal, which had been under Islamic attack for centuries, beginning with the invasion of the Turkish marauder Bakhtiyar Khilji eight hundred years back. We had a respite from Islamic rule for about two hundred years after the English East India Company defeated the Muslim ruler of Bengal. Siraj-ud-daulah in 1757. But gradually, Bengal had been turned into a Muslim majority province.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcqs of Past Papers Pakistan Affairs
    Agha Zuhaib Khan MCQS OF PAST PAPERS PAKISTAN AFFAIRS 1). Sir syed ahmed khan advocated the inclusion of Indians in Legislative Council in his famous book, Causes of the Indian Revolt, as early as: a) 1850 b) 1860 c) 1870 d) None of these 2). Who repeatedly refers to Sir Syed as Father of Muslim India and Father of Modern Muslim India: a) Hali b) Abdul Qadir c) Ch. Khaliquz Zaman d) None of these 3). Military strength of East India Company and the Financial Support of Jaggat Seth of Murshidabad gave birth to events at: a) Plassey b) Panipat c) None of these 4). Clive in one of his Gazettes made it mandatory that no Muslim shall be given an employment higher than that of chaprasy or a junior clerk has recorded by: a) Majumdar b) Hasan Isphani c) Karamat Ali d) None of these 5). The renowned author of the Spirit of Islam and a Short History of the Saracens was: a) Shiblee b) Nawab Mohsin c) None of these ( Syed Ameer Ali) 1 www.css2012.co.nr www.facebook.com/css2012 Agha Zuhaib Khan 6). Nawab Sir Salimullah Khan was President of Bengal Musilm Leage in: a) 1903 b) 1913 c) 1923 d) None of these (1912) 7). The first issue of Maualana Abul Kalam Azads „Al Hilal‟ came out on 13 July: a) 1912 b) 1922 c) 1932 d) None of these 8). At the annual session of Anjuman Hamayat Islam in 1911 Iqbal‟s poem was recited, poetically called: a) Sham-o-Shahr b) Shikwa c) Jawab-i-Shikwa d) None of these 9).
    [Show full text]
  • Picture of Muslim Politics in India Before Wavell's
    Muhammad Iqbal Chawala PICTURE OF MUSLIM POLITICS IN INDIA BEFORE WAVELL’S VICEROYALTY The Hindu-Muslim conflict in India had entered its final phase in the 1940’s. The Muslim League, on the basis of the Two-Nation Theory, had been demanding a separate homeland for the Muslims of India. The movement for Pakistan was getting into full steam at the time of Wavell’s arrival to India in October 1943 although it was opposed by an influential section of the Muslims. This paper examines the Muslim politics in India and also highlights the background of their demand for a separate homeland. It analyzes the nature, programme and leadership of the leading Muslim political parties in India. It also highlights their aims and objectives for gaining an understanding of their future behaviour. Additionally, it discusses the origin and evolution of the British policy in India, with special reference to the Muslim problem. Moreover, it tries to understand whether Wavell’s experiences in India, first as a soldier and then as the Commander-in-Chief, proved helpful to him in understanding the mood of the Muslim political scene in India. British Policy in India Wavell was appointed as the Viceroy of India upon the retirement of Lord Linlithgow in October 1943. He was no stranger to India having served here on two previous occasions. His first-ever posting in India was at Ambala in 1903 and his unit moved to the NWFP in 1904 as fears mounted of a war with 75 76 [J.R.S.P., Vol. 45, No. 1, 2008] Russia.1 His stay in the Frontier province left deep and lasting impressions on him.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferozepur District, No-12, Punjab
    CENSUS OF INDIA~ 1961 PUNJAB DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK No. 12 FEROZEPUR DISTRICT' R L. ANAND Superintendent of Census, Operations and Enumeration Commissioner, Punjab Published by the Government of Punjab 1965 CENSUS OF INDIA 1961 A-CENTRAL GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS ~~ations relating to Punjab bear Volume No. XIII, and are bound separately as follows ;- Part I-A , . General Report Part IV-B · . Tables on Housing and Establish- ments Part I-B Report on Vital Statistics Part V-A Special Tables on Scheduled PartI-C(i) · . Subsidiary Tables Castes and Scheduled Tribes Part V-B · . Eth_nographic Notes on Scheduled Part I-C(ii) · . Subsidiary Tables Castes and Scheduled Tribes Part II-A · . General Population Tables Part VI · . Village Survey Monographs : 44 in number, each relating to an Part II-B(i) · . General Economic Tables (Tables individual village B-I to B-IV, B-VIn and B-IX) Part VII-A Report on Selected Handicrafts Part 11-B (ii) · . General Economic Tables (Tables B-V to B-VII) Part VII-B Report and Tables on Fairs and Festivals Part H-C (i) · . Social and Cultural Tables Part VIII-A Administrative Report: Enurnera- tion (Not for sale) Part H-C (ii) · . Migration Tables Part VIII-B Administrative Report: Tabula- Part III · . Household Economic Tables tion (Not for sale) Part IV-A Report on Housing and Establish- Part IX · . Socio-Economic Atla~ ments B-PUNJAB GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS 19 Volumes of District Census Handboo ks ;- DCH-l · . Hissar DCH-ll · . Ludhiana DCH-2 · . Rohtak DCH-12 · . Ferozepur DCH-3 Gurgaon DCH-13 · . Amritsar DCH-4 · . Karnal DCH-14 Gurdaspur DCH-S · .
    [Show full text]
  • PRINT CULTURE and LEFT-WING RADICALISM in LAHORE, PAKISTAN, C.1947-1971
    PRINT CULTURE AND LEFT-WING RADICALISM IN LAHORE, PAKISTAN, c.1947-1971 Irfan Waheed Usmani (M.Phil, History, University of Punjab, Lahore) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SOUTH ASIAN STUDIES PROGRAMME NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2016 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. _________________________________ Irfan Waheed Usmani 21 August 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First I would like to thank God Almighty for enabling me to pursue my higher education and enabling me to finish this project. At the very outset I would like to express deepest gratitude and thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Gyanesh Kudaisya, who provided constant support and guidance to this doctoral project. His depth of knowledge on history and related concepts guided me in appropriate direction. His interventions were both timely and meaningful, contributing towards my own understanding of interrelated issues and the subject on one hand, and on the other hand, injecting my doctoral journey with immense vigour and spirit. Without his valuable guidance, support, understanding approach, wisdom and encouragement this thesis would not have been possible. His role as a guide has brought real improvements in my approach as researcher and I cannot measure his contributions in words. I must acknowledge that I owe all the responsibility of gaps and mistakes in my work. I am thankful to his wife Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Khizr Hayat Tiwana: the Last and Sole Voice of the Unionist Party in the British Punjab
    Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan Volume No. 55, Issue No. 2 (July - December, 2018) Maqbool Ahmad Awan* Khizr Hayat Tiwana: The Last and Sole Voice of the Unionist Party in the British Punjab Abstract This research paper provides a comprehensive description of Khizr Hayat Tiwana‘s role in the Punjab Politics and also examines briefly the settlement of the Tiwana tribe in Kalra estate of Punjab Province along with his emergence in the political field in detail. The Unionist Party had been enjoying unparalleled and unrivaled pinnacles of popularity with strong power base in the British Punjab since its inception. Further this article delineates the fall of the Unionist Party in the Punjab and gives a detailed account about how it started waning in apolitical hands of Khizr Hayat after Sir Sikandar‘s death. It was, in fact, a mighty task for Khizr Hayat to steer the party on the magnificent path laid down by his predecessors. This study chiefly encapsulates the incipient role of Khizr Hayat as a Minister of Public Works in Sikandar‘s cabinet and later as a Premier of the British Punjab. It further traces the Muslim League‘s disgraceful fall in the provincial elections of 1937 and later its revival under the magnetic and charismatic leadership of Jinnah during the elections of 1946. Besides this, the dual policy and diplomatic approach of the British Government during Khizr‘s Premiership in the Punjab has been highlighted minutely. The paper includes his significant role as the Premier of the Punjab during WW-II for the fulfillment of the British demands from the Punjab Province.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mirage of Power, by Mubashir Hasan
    The Mirage of Power AN ENQUIRY INTO THE BHUTTO YEARS 1971-1977 BY MUBASHIR HASAN Reproduced By: Sani H. Panhwar Member Sindh Council PPP. CONTENTS About the Author .. .. .. .. .. .. i Preface .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ii Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. v 1. The Dramatic Takeover .. .. .. .. .. 1 2. State of the Nation .. .. .. .. .. .. 14 3. Meeting the Challenges (1) .. .. .. .. 22 4. Meeting the Challenges (2) .. .. .. .. 43 5. Restructuring the Economy (1) .. .. .. .. 64 6. Restructuring the Economy (2) .. .. .. .. 85 7. Accords and Discords .. .. .. .. 100 8. All Not Well .. .. .. .. .. .. 120 9. Feeling Free .. .. .. .. .. .. 148 10. The Year of Change .. .. .. .. .. 167 11. All Power to the Establishment .. .. .. .. 187 12. The Losing Battle .. .. .. .. .. .. 199 13. The Battle Lost .. .. .. .. .. .. 209 14. The Economic Legacy .. .. .. .. .. 222 Appendices .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 261 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Mubashir Hasan is a well known figure in both academic and political circles in Pakistan. A Ph.D. in civil engineering, he served as an irrigation engineer and taught at the engineering university at Lahore. The author's formal entry into politics took place in 1967 when the founding convention of the Pakistan Peoples' Party was held at his residence. He was elected a member of the National Assembly of Pakistan in 1970 and served as Finance Minister in the late Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's Cabinet from 1971-1974. In 1975, he was elected Secretary General of the PPP. Following the promulgation of martial law in 1977, the author was jailed for his political beliefs. Dr. Hasan has written three books, numerous articles, and has spoken extensively on social, economic and political subjects: 2001, Birds of the Indus, (Mubashir Hasan, Tom J.
    [Show full text]