DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Mobility Policy Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Mobility Policy Review Sustainable Mobility Policy Review Background Paper 9 Statistics and Trends Contents Context and questions for consideration .............................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Trends in public transport use ......................................................................................................... 4 3 Demographics of public transport users ...................................................................................... 16 4 Finances and funding ....................................................................................................................... 25 5 Availability and reliability ................................................................................................................ 38 6 Operator statistics ............................................................................................................................ 45 7 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 55 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... 57 Data Sources and References ................................................................................................................ 58 Prepared by the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport www.dttas.gov.ie List of Figures Figure 2.1: Numbers commuting to work, school or college by mode, 2006-2016 ........................ 5 Figure 2.2: Public transport use to work, school or college, 1986-2016 ........................................... 5 Figure 2.3: Work commutes by transport mode, 1996 to 2016 .......................................................... 6 Figure 2.4: Public transport use by work commuters, 1986-2016 ...................................................... 7 Figure 2.5: Public transport use by school, and college students, 2006-2016 ................................. 8 Figure 2.6: Breakdown of daily journeys by purpose, 2016 ................................................................. 9 Figure 2.7: Percentage of all adult journeys by mode, 2012-2016 ..................................................... 9 Figure 2.8: Percentage of journeys made by public transport, Dublin and rest of country......... 10 Figure 2.9: Dublin Canal Cordon Count, 2010-2018 .......................................................................... 11 Figure 2.10: Dublin Canal Cordon Count by public transport mode, 2010-2018 ........................... 11 Figure 2.11: Percentage of commuting journeys to work by public transport, 2016 ..................... 13 Figure 3.1: Regional breakdown of work commuters’ car and public transport use, 2016 ......... 17 Figure 3.2: Age breakdown of work commuters’ car and public transport use, 2016 .................. 18 Figure 3.3: Gender breakdown of work commuters’ public transport use, 2016 .......................... 18 Figure 3.4: Work commute journey duration in minutes, urban areas, 2016 ................................. 19 Figure 3.5: Work commute journey duration in minutes, rural areas, 2016 ................................... 20 Figure 3.6: Average weekly expenditure on transport, 2015 ............................................................ 21 Figure 3.7: Overall satisfaction of public transport users ................................................................... 22 Figure 3.8: Satisfaction with aspects of public transport by service ................................................ 22 Figure 3.9: Older people’s rating of public transport........................................................................... 23 Figure 4.1: Exchequer capital and current funding expenditure, 1995-2018 ................................ 26 Figure 4.2: Public transport expenditure as percentage of total Exchequer spend, 1998- 2018………………. ...................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 4.3: IMMAC/Rail Safety Programme funding as a proportion of heavy rail capital allocation, 1999-2018 ........................................................................................................... 28 Figure 4.4: Exchequer funding for PSO services (including Rural Transport Programme), 1998-2018 ............................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 4.5: PSO payments, 2010-2018 .................................................................................................. 31 Figure 4.6: Passenger revenue across PSO services, 2010-2018 ..................................................... 31 Figure 4.7: PSO subsidy/passenger revenue and passenger numbers, 2010-2018 ..................... 32 Figure 4.8: DEASP Free Travel funding & Free Travel Scheme recipients, 1998-2018 ............... 33 Figure 4.9: DEASP Free Travel Scheme funding per recipient, 1998-2018 ................................... 34 Figure 4.10: DEASP funding per Free Travel Scheme (€m) by operator, 2013-2018 ..................... 34 Figure 4.11: DEASP Free Travel Scheme passenger journeys by operator, 2013-2018 ................ 35 Figure 4.12: Comparison of road and public transport funding allocations, 1998-2018 ............... 36 Figure 5.1: Bus stops versus population density by county, 2017 ................................................... 39 Figure 5.2: Train stations versus population density by county, 2017 ............................................ 40 Figure 5.3: Bus Éireann urban services operated as planned versus target, 2010-2017 ............. 42 Figure 5.4: GDA bus and heavy rail services operated as planned versus target, 2010-2017 ... 42 Figure 5.5: Intercity bus and rail services operated as planned versus target, 2010-2017 ......... 43 Figure 5.6: Luas services - Percentage of timetabled kilometres delivered, 2010-2018 ............. 43 Figure 6.1: Year-on-year change in public transport passenger numbers, 2011-2018 ................ 46 Figure 6.2: Annual passenger numbers by operator, 2010-2018 ..................................................... 46 Figure 6.3: Bus Éireann passenger numbers in regional cities, 2011-2018 .................................... 47 Figure 6.4: Public transport passenger revenues by operator, 2010-2018 .................................... 48 Figure 6.5: Regional public transport passenger revenues (bus), 2013-2018 ................................ 49 Figure 6.6: Average fare by operator (excluding Free Travel Scheme), 2006-2018 (2006 prices) ........................................................................................................................................ 49 Figure 6.7: Operating cost per passenger, 2006-2018 ....................................................................... 50 Figure 6.8: Cost recovery (fares/operating cost), 2006-2018 ........................................................... 51 Figure 6.9: Bus fleet size, 2010-2018..................................................................................................... 52 Figure 6.10: Average age of bus fleet, 2010-2018 ................................................................................ 53 Figure 6.11: Wheelchair accessibility of bus fleet, 2013-2018 ........................................................... 54 List of Tables Table 2.1: Public transport use by work commuters, 1986-2016 ....................................................... 6 Table 2.2: Dublin Canal Cordon Count, 2010-2018 ............................................................................ 12 Table 2.3: Public transport modal share of commuting journeys by county, 2016 ....................... 14 Table 3.1: Percentage of older people reporting difficulty accessing public transport, 2015 .... 24 Table 4.1: PSO payments 2010–2018 ................................................................................................... 30 Context and questions for consideration This background paper is one of a number of papers that have been prepared by the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport to inform a public consultation on Ireland’s sustainable mobility policy. The review work arises from a commitment in the Programme for a Partnership Government1 to review public transport policy “to ensure services are sustainable into the future and are meeting the needs of a modern economy”. The public consultation is designed to give stakeholders, interested parties and the general public the opportunity to reflect on the information and analysis in the papers, to share their views, and to contribute to the development of a Sustainable Mobility Policy Statement. Sustainable Mobility can be described as linking people and places in a sustainable way by supporting: . comfortable and affordable journeys to and from work, home, school, college, shops and leisure; . travelling by cleaner and greener transport; and . a shift away from the private car to greater use of active travel (walking and cycling) and public transport (e.g. bus, rail, tram). All elements of sustainable mobility (public transport, cycling, walking) are being considered in the policy review. Each background paper includes a number of questions to generate ideas about the extent to which the present approach
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport Trends 2015
    Transport Trends An Overview of Ireland’s Transport Sector Economic and Financial Evaluation Unit Issue 1/2015 : [email protected] Overview and Contents Transport Trends seeks to provide a concise overview of the key developments that are evident from the latest Irish transport data. The publication is produced annually by the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport’s Economic and Financial Evaluation Unit (EFEU); a constituent unit of the Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service (IGEES). The contents of this publication are based on data sourced from various official sources and internal data. While the responsibility for data accuracy remains with the original source as cited, any errors in transposition or analysis in this document are the responsibility of EFEU. Information provided here should be used for reference purposes. Any use of data for analysis or publication should rely on the original sources as cited. It is important to note that this publication is not intended to cover the full range of transport statistics and as such wider databases (such as the CSO) should be relied upon for analysis. The Data Sources and Notes section should be consulted when interpreting this document. This publication was produced by the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport’s Economic and Financial Evaluation Unit and does not necessarily represent any views of the Minister or the Government. This document is arranged as follows: Section A: Infrastructure A broad overview of the infrastructure that makes up the Irish transport system by area: roads, public transport, maritime, aviation and sustainable transport. Section B: Investment An analysis of expenditure and revenue associated with transport and recent trends in this context to detail where funding has been targeted.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Archaeology and the National Roads Authority Dáire O’Rourke
    4. Archaeology and the National Roads Authority Dáire O’Rourke Bronze Age ditched enclosure (centre left) at Tullyallen 1, County Louth, on the M1 Drogheda Bypass (Valerie J Keeley Ltd) Functions of the National Roads Authority The National Roads Authority (NRA) was established in 1994, as an independent statutory body under the Roads Act 1993. The NRA’s primary function is to secure the provision of a safe and efficient network of national roads. Its current programme of new road schemes forms part of the government’s overall strategy for the improvement of national infrastructure. More specific functions are prescribed by the 1993 Act, including the following: • preparing or arranging for the preparation of national road designs • securing the carrying out of construction, improvement and maintenance works on national roads • allocating and paying grants for national roads. 19 Archaeology and the National Roads Authority A view of a Bronze Age ditched enclosure at Tullyallen 1, County Louth, on the M1 Drogheda Bypass (Valerie J Keeley Ltd) Historically, the NRA has discharged its functions through the relevant local authorities (though it is also empowered to carry out such functions directly). Under Section 20 of the Roads Act 1993 the NRA has general power to direct a road authority (i.e. a local authority) to ‘do any other thing which arises out of or is consequential on or is necessary or expedient for the purposes of or would facilitate the construction or maintenance of a national road.’ Funding Funding of the NRA is primarily in the form of grants from the Minister for Environment and Local Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Eireann Complaints Phone Number
    Bus Eireann Complaints Phone Number Historiographic Guillaume degreases some satyrs after asymptotic Harris sullies licitly. Which West circumfusing so picturesquely that Merell serializing her arboriculturist? Anders attends allegedly while radiosensitive Hamlin Sellotape contumaciously or undersell dissymmetrically. Dublin bus eireann complaint, including wexford bus services from accessing newsroom information? Tfi cycle planner app to your bus driver on your card against any phone is regulated by bus stops or days of food and wexford. App and end of private notes or athlone and general hospital, for the appropriate fare to calendar week, routes for designated red bus. Users of payment card number. It for tfi driver cannot accept or bus eireann? Present your bus eireann complaints phone number and commuter rail. Find out more bus operators offer bus and would never ask for more about how you check that can resolve their complaint by bus eireann complaints phone number. TFI Leap Card on Bus Éireann services. For more info under a prepaid tickets can be part of any nfc is information into a bus eireann complaints phone number for your ticket option to pay for affordable fun and touch directly can click on. Well as to the option to calendar week, sligo or bus eireann complaints phone number. They can also hold prepaid tickets. Any fares paid on Airlink and Tours do not count towards the cap. Where you can call us and speak to a Customer Service representative. Why mse rates us from the bus eireann complaint in good time you return tickets and others during the correct fare.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tara/Skryne Valley and the M3 Motorway; Development Vs. Heritage
    L . o . 4 .0 «? ■ U i H NUI MAYNOOTH Qll*c«il n> h£jf**nn Ml Nuad The Tara/Skryne Valley and the M3 Motorway; Development vs. Heritage. Edel Reynolds 2005 Supervisor: Dr. Ronan Foley Head of Department: Professor James Walsh Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the M.A. (Geographical Analysis), Department of Geography, National University of Ireland, Maynooth. Abstract This thesis is about the conflict concerning the building of the MB motorway in an archaeologically sensitive area close to the Hill of Tara in Co. Meath. The main aim of this thesis was to examine the conflict between development and heritage in relation to the Tara/Skryne Valley; therefore the focus has been to investigate the planning process. It has been found that both the planning process and the Environmental Impact Assessment system in Ireland is inadequate. Another aspect of the conflict that was explored was the issue of insiders and outsiders. Through the examination of both quantitative and qualitative data, the conclusion has been reached that the majority of insiders, people from the Tara area, do in fact want the M3 to be built. This is contrary to the idea that was portrayed by the media that most people were opposed to the construction of the motorway. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Ronan Foley, for all of his help and guidance over the last few months. Thanks to my parents, Helen and Liam and sisters, Anne and Nora for all of their encouragement over the last few months and particularly the last few days! I would especially like to thank my mother for driving me to Cavan on her precious day off, and for calming me down when I got stressed! Thanks to Yvonne for giving me the grand tour of Cavan, and for helping me carry out surveys there.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for a Free Primary School Travel Pass September 2021 to July 2022 Please Read the Enclosed Notes of Guidance Before You Start to Fill in This Form
    Application for a free primary school travel pass September 2021 to July 2022 Please read the enclosed notes of guidance before you start to fill in this form. Only Manchester City Council residents can use this form to apply for a free travel pass. A Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) travel pass enables the child to make a return journey to and from school on any Greater Manchester bus, tram or train. This pass is valid for one academic year. The information provided on this application form will be used to ensure that the council’s records are correct. It may also be shared with other agencies and service providers to ensure that your child receives an appropriate service. For further information, please see the council's privacy notice at www.manchester.gov.uk/privacy. Section A. Child’s details Child’s forename Child’s surname Date of birth Home address This must be the child’s normal place of residence Postcode Section B. Parent/carer’s details Parent/carer’s forename Parent/carer’s surname Relationship to child Email address Home telephone number Mobile telephone number Section C. Travel pass eligibility Please complete the questions below and attach further evidence as indicated. Choose the group you are applying under, either group 1, 2 or 3. See the attached notes for information regarding the eligibility criteria. Full name of child’s current school School’s area or postcode Has your child had a free travel pass for this school before? Yes No Group 1 – Looked After Child Is the child a Looked After Child (LAC), LAC from
    [Show full text]
  • News from the Cities
    NEWS March 2019 NO 62 le y b it a rrt r in o o ta th EMTA s spou u a s anspo tr News from the cities One-month countdown begins • Providing advice and support to more than 6,000 registered fleet customers and more than 1,000 as capital gets ready for central other stakeholders, such as small businesses, charities and health services London ULEZ • Installing more than 300 road signs warning drivers at all entry points to the ULEZ and on a Central London ULEZ number of key approach routes of the zone begins on 8 April 2019 and will introduce the toughest The Mayor and TfL are providing help for Londoners emission standards of any world city. TfL has been who still need to get ULEZ-ready with nearly £50m set working with businesses across London to help aside to encourage the scrappage of polluting vehicles. them prepare. TfL’s communications campaign has Small businesses and charities can access support to seen more than 2.7 million road users check their upgrade to the cleanest vehicles through the Mayor’s vehicle’s compliance £23m diesel scrappage scheme. The scheme offers up to £6,000 of funding to help scrap vehicles and help The central London Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) with running costs of cleaner options. starts in April 8 and Transport for London (TfL) is reminding drivers to check their vehicles online and get ready for the scheme which will help clean up London’s toxic air. Air pollution in London is responsible for thousands of premature deaths every year, affecting vulnerable people the most.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Infrastructure
    Navan Development Plan 2009-2015 November 2009 CHAPTER 7: INFRASTRUCTURE SECTIONS IN THIS CHAPTER 7.1 Transportation-Introduction 7.2 Goals 7.3 Roads 7.4 Pedestrians and Cyclists 7.5 Public Transport 7.6 Park & Ride, Parking, Loading & Taxi Ranks 7.7 Street Furniture & Lighting 7.8 Keeping the Street Clean 7.9 Water Supply & Sewerage Treatment & Disposal 7.10 Flooding 7.11 Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems 7.12 Telecommunications 7.13 Broadband 7.14 Solid Waste Collection & Disposal 7.15 Energy 161 Navan Development Plan 2009-2015 November 2009 7.1 Transportation-Introduction The context for this chapter is provided in Chapter Two of this Development Plan. The key to Navan’s sustainable growth is the development of an integrated land use and transportation system which provides for a development pattern that protects Navan’s architectural and natural heritage while providing for growth and economic development. The integration of land use and transportation policies, both in the town centre and outer suburban areas underpins the transportation strategy as outlined below. 7.2 Goals It is the goal of Navan Town Council and Meath County Council to create vibrant urban areas with good provision of public transport, reduced traffic congestion and an attractive urban centre, which is not dominated by the car. It is the main objective of the Planning Authorities to create an integrated and environmentally sound system, with particular emphasis on: Accessibility and choice of transport for all; Strong integration between transportation planning
    [Show full text]
  • The Demand for Public Transport: a Practical Guide
    The demand for public transport: a practical guide R Balcombe, TRL Limited (Editor) R Mackett, Centre for Transport Studies, University College London N Paulley, TRL Limited J Preston, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford J Shires, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds H Titheridge, Centre for Transport Studies, University College London M Wardman, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds P White, Transport Studies Group, University of Westminster TRL Report TRL593 First Published 2004 ISSN 0968-4107 Copyright TRL Limited 2004. This report has been produced by the contributory authors and published by TRL Limited as part of a project funded by EPSRC (Grants No GR/R18550/01, GR/R18567/01 and GR/R18574/01) and also supported by a number of other institutions as listed on the acknowledgements page. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the supporting and funding organisations TRL is committed to optimising energy efficiency, reducing waste and promoting recycling and re-use. In support of these environmental goals, this report has been printed on recycled paper, comprising 100% post-consumer waste, manufactured using a TCF (totally chlorine free) process. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The assistance of the following organisations is gratefully acknowledged: Arriva International Association of Public Transport (UITP) Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) Local Government Association (LGA) Confederation of Passenger Transport (CPT) National Express Group plc Department for Transport (DfT) Nexus Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Network Rail Council (EPSRC) Rees Jeffery Road Fund FirstGroup plc Stagecoach Group plc Go-Ahead Group plc Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) Greater Manchester Public Transport Transport for London (TfL) Executive (GMPTE) Travel West Midlands The Working Group coordinating the project consisted of the authors and Jonathan Pugh and Matthew Chivers of ATOC and David Harley, David Walmsley and Mark James of CPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Associated with Planning, Implementing, Managing and Operating Public Transport Projects in Ireland
    Urban Transport XIX 79 Issues associated with planning, implementing, managing and operating public transport projects in Ireland R. Byrne Murray1, M. Murphy1 & A. Ahern2 1College of Engineering and Built Environment, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland 2School of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University College Dublin, Ireland Abstract Whilst considering the context to which public transport is planned in Ireland and internationally, the research has been concerned with studying the methodology and the roles of key stakeholders for the planning, implementation, management and operation of public transport projects in order to gauge the efficiency and suitability of the Irish planning process in relation to our international counterparts The paper will present principal findings from structured interviews undertaken with key stakeholders involved in the Irish process and will provide a basis for debating the issues raised as a consequence of these interviews. Key issues raised include: 1) the possible complexity of the planning process in Ireland; 2) the role of political agendas in the decision making process; and 3) the governance and institutional arrangements for planning public transport projects in Ireland in contrast with other international countries. Keywords: public transport planning, institutional arrangements, governance, political agendas, public transport decision making, planning process, Irish planning, transport planning issues, stakeholders, planning complexities. 1 Introduction Whilst considering
    [Show full text]
  • Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1St Progress Report for Ireland 2014
    Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1st Progress Report for Ireland Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1st Progress Report for Ireland 2014 Page 1 of 37 Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1st Progress Report for Ireland Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1st Progress Report for Ireland Section A – Contact details ........................................................................................................................ 3 Section B – General Overview .................................................................................................................... 3 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Section C – National ITS Activities in Priority Area 1 ................................................................................. 4 Optimal use of road, traffic and travel data .......................................................................................... 4 Section D – National ITS Activities in Priority Area 2 ................................................................................. 5 Continuity of traffic and freight management ITS services ................................................................... 5 Section E – National ITS Activities in Priority Area 3 .................................................................................. 6 ITS road safety and security applications .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waterford Bypass
    ENGINEERS IRELAND WATERFORD BYPASS WATERFORD BYPASS JOHN T. MURPHY, BE, CEng, FIEI, HDipMM, RConsEI Project Director, Mott MacDonald Ireland JOE SHINKWIN, BE, CEng, MIEI, DipMechEng Project Manager, Mott MacDonald Ireland Presented to a meeting of the Cork Region of Engineers Ireland 23rd February 2010 SYNOPSIS The N25 Waterford Bypass comprises a 16.3 km of dual carriageway bypass of Waterford City, 9.5 km of major link roads and an additional 13 km of side roads. It includes a 465 metre long dual carriageway cable-stayed bridge over the River Suir (with a 230m main span), plus a number of major viaduct and grade separated interchange structures totalling over 50 bridges. This paper describes the development of the current route for the N25 Waterford Bypass including the various phases of route selection. It deals with the project’s inclusion as a pilot PPP project and the development of the PPP contract. It follows the project through the statutory processes (including the discovery of Viking remains and the need to find a new route around the designated national monument site in Woodstown). The paper also describes the selection of the chosen bridge type for the Suir River Crossing and looks at some of the other major structures. Finally, the paper will briefly describe the construction contract and various aspects of construction. 1 MURPHY and SHINKWIN INTRODUCTION crossing of the Suir in the Waterford viii) were evaluated without area would impose costs on, and quantification while items v), vi), and vii) The need for a second river crossing of produce benefits for, the community at were derived in the process of the the River Suir in Waterford has been large.
    [Show full text]
  • Galway County Development Board - Priority Actions 2009-2012
    Galway CDB Strategy 2009-2012, May 2009 Galway County Development Board - Priority Actions 2009-2012 Table of Contents Galway County Development Board ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Priority Actions 2009-2012.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Galway County Development Board........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Format of Report.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 1: Priority Strategy - Summary....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Section 2 - Detailed Action Programme.....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]