Chapter 7: Infrastructure
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Transport Trends 2015
Transport Trends An Overview of Ireland’s Transport Sector Economic and Financial Evaluation Unit Issue 1/2015 : [email protected] Overview and Contents Transport Trends seeks to provide a concise overview of the key developments that are evident from the latest Irish transport data. The publication is produced annually by the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport’s Economic and Financial Evaluation Unit (EFEU); a constituent unit of the Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service (IGEES). The contents of this publication are based on data sourced from various official sources and internal data. While the responsibility for data accuracy remains with the original source as cited, any errors in transposition or analysis in this document are the responsibility of EFEU. Information provided here should be used for reference purposes. Any use of data for analysis or publication should rely on the original sources as cited. It is important to note that this publication is not intended to cover the full range of transport statistics and as such wider databases (such as the CSO) should be relied upon for analysis. The Data Sources and Notes section should be consulted when interpreting this document. This publication was produced by the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport’s Economic and Financial Evaluation Unit and does not necessarily represent any views of the Minister or the Government. This document is arranged as follows: Section A: Infrastructure A broad overview of the infrastructure that makes up the Irish transport system by area: roads, public transport, maritime, aviation and sustainable transport. Section B: Investment An analysis of expenditure and revenue associated with transport and recent trends in this context to detail where funding has been targeted. -
NRA M50 Multi-Point Tolling
National Roads Authority Supplementary Report M50 Multi-Point Tolling Preliminary Implementation Plan Date: 20 May 2011 WORKING DRAFT (Issued) Information Note: This report was prepared for the Department of Transport by the National Roads Authority with the assistance of Roughan & O’Donovan AECOM Alliance and Goodbody Economic Consultants. National Roads Authority M50 Multi-Point Tolling Preliminary Implementation Plan Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Project Description (Scope & Objectives) 4 3. Legislative Framework 6 4. Proposed Tolling & Operational Regime 12 5. Delivery / Procurement Approach 24 Appendix A – Map of Proposed Tolling Locations Appendix B – Report on Network Tolling Options, 1 November 2010 Roughan & O'Donovan – Goodbody Economic Aecom Alliance Consultants Grand Canal House Ballsbridge Park Upper Grand Canal Street Ballsbridge Dublin 4 Dublin 4 www.aecom.com www.goodbody.ie/consultants Page 1 of 29 National Roads Authority M50 Multi-Point Tolling Preliminary Implementation Plan 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 In November 2010, the National Roads Authority submitted a feasibility report to the Department of Transport setting out a number of options for generating additional revenue from road tolling to support future transport investment and maintenance. This feasibility report (appended to this document for ease of reference) reviewed the following options: ▪ Work-package A: Raising Tolls at Existing Facilities; ▪ Work-package B: Introducing new tolls on existing roads comprising: ▪ Work-package B1: M50 Multi-Point Tolling (M50 MPT); ▪ Work-package B2: Tolling Charges on Dublin Radial Routes; ▪ Work-package B3: Tolling Charges on Jack Lynch Tunnel, Cork; ▪ Work-package B4: Tolling Charges on N18, N9 and N11; ▪ Work-package C: Introducing new toll charges on new roads. -
4. Archaeology and the National Roads Authority Dáire O’Rourke
4. Archaeology and the National Roads Authority Dáire O’Rourke Bronze Age ditched enclosure (centre left) at Tullyallen 1, County Louth, on the M1 Drogheda Bypass (Valerie J Keeley Ltd) Functions of the National Roads Authority The National Roads Authority (NRA) was established in 1994, as an independent statutory body under the Roads Act 1993. The NRA’s primary function is to secure the provision of a safe and efficient network of national roads. Its current programme of new road schemes forms part of the government’s overall strategy for the improvement of national infrastructure. More specific functions are prescribed by the 1993 Act, including the following: • preparing or arranging for the preparation of national road designs • securing the carrying out of construction, improvement and maintenance works on national roads • allocating and paying grants for national roads. 19 Archaeology and the National Roads Authority A view of a Bronze Age ditched enclosure at Tullyallen 1, County Louth, on the M1 Drogheda Bypass (Valerie J Keeley Ltd) Historically, the NRA has discharged its functions through the relevant local authorities (though it is also empowered to carry out such functions directly). Under Section 20 of the Roads Act 1993 the NRA has general power to direct a road authority (i.e. a local authority) to ‘do any other thing which arises out of or is consequential on or is necessary or expedient for the purposes of or would facilitate the construction or maintenance of a national road.’ Funding Funding of the NRA is primarily in the form of grants from the Minister for Environment and Local Government. -
3.4 Sustainable Movement & Transport
3.4 Sustainable Movement & Transport 3.4.3 Challenges & Opportunities cater for occasional use and particularly for families. This in turn impacts on car parking requirements and consequently density levels. A key The Woodbrook-Shanganagh LAP presents a real opportunity to achieve a challenge with be to effectively control parking provision as a travel demand modal shift from the private car to other sustainable transport modes such management measure. 3.4.1 Introduction as walking, cycling and public transport. The challenge will be to secure early and timely delivery of key connections and strategic public transport 3.4.4 The Way Forward Since the original 2006 Woodbrook-Shanganagh LAP, the strategic transport elements - such as the DART Station - so to establish behaviour change from planning policy context has changed considerably with the emergence of a the outset. In essence, the movement strategy for the LAP is to prioritise walking series of higher level policy and guidance documents, as well as new state Shanganagh Park, straddling the two development parcels, creates the and cycling in an environment that is safe, pleasant, accessible and easy agency structures and responsibilities, including the National Transport opportunity for a relatively fine grain of pedestrian and cycle routes to achieve to move about within the neighbourhoods, and where journeys from and Authority (NTA) and Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII). a good level of permeability and connectivity between the sites and to key to the new development area are predominantly by sustainable means of The key policy documents emerging since 2006 include, inter alia: facilities such as the DART Station and Neighbourhood Centre. -
An Bord Pleanála
An Bord Pleanála ROADS ACTS 1993 to 2007 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTS 2000 to 2011 Cork County Council APPLICATION by the National Roads Authority of St Martin’s House, Ballsbridge, Dublin for approval under section 51 of the Roads Act, 1993, as amended, in accordance with documentation, including an environmental impact statement and a Natura impact statement, lodged with An Bord Pleanála on the 19 th day of July, 2012. PROPOSED ROAD DEVELOPMENT: An improved interchange at the location of the existing Dunkettle Interchange at the intersection of the N8 National Primary Road, the N25 National Primary Road and the N40 National Primary Road in the townlands of Lota, Dunkettle, Inchera, Kilcoolishal and Wallingstown, County Cork comprising: (i) a series of direct road links between the N8 National Primary Road, the N25 National Primary Road and the N40 National Primary Road and links to the R623 Regional Road in Wallingstown and to Burys Bridge in Dunkettle and Kilcoolishal, (ii) one number grade separated junction arrangement at the existing N25 National Primary Road approximately 650 metres to the east of the existing Dunkettle Interchange, (iii) four number roundabouts – two number at the grade separated junction, one number at the tie-in with the existing road network in Dunkettle and Kilcoolishal and one number at the tie-in with the existing road network in Wallingstown, ______________________________________________________________ 04.HA0039 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 5 (iv) 43 number major structures of various forms comprising: - one number overbridge, - seven number underbridges, - two number railway bridges, - one number footbridge, - modification of the northern approach structure to the Jack Lynch Tunnel, - seven number retaining walls, and - 24 number gantries, (v) several culverts where the scheme crosses watercourses or intertidal areas, and (vi) pedestrian and cyclist facilities, together with all ancillary and consequential works associated therewith. -
The Tara/Skryne Valley and the M3 Motorway; Development Vs. Heritage
L . o . 4 .0 «? ■ U i H NUI MAYNOOTH Qll*c«il n> h£jf**nn Ml Nuad The Tara/Skryne Valley and the M3 Motorway; Development vs. Heritage. Edel Reynolds 2005 Supervisor: Dr. Ronan Foley Head of Department: Professor James Walsh Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the M.A. (Geographical Analysis), Department of Geography, National University of Ireland, Maynooth. Abstract This thesis is about the conflict concerning the building of the MB motorway in an archaeologically sensitive area close to the Hill of Tara in Co. Meath. The main aim of this thesis was to examine the conflict between development and heritage in relation to the Tara/Skryne Valley; therefore the focus has been to investigate the planning process. It has been found that both the planning process and the Environmental Impact Assessment system in Ireland is inadequate. Another aspect of the conflict that was explored was the issue of insiders and outsiders. Through the examination of both quantitative and qualitative data, the conclusion has been reached that the majority of insiders, people from the Tara area, do in fact want the M3 to be built. This is contrary to the idea that was portrayed by the media that most people were opposed to the construction of the motorway. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Ronan Foley, for all of his help and guidance over the last few months. Thanks to my parents, Helen and Liam and sisters, Anne and Nora for all of their encouragement over the last few months and particularly the last few days! I would especially like to thank my mother for driving me to Cavan on her precious day off, and for calming me down when I got stressed! Thanks to Yvonne for giving me the grand tour of Cavan, and for helping me carry out surveys there. -
County Wexford Road Traffic Special Speed Limit Bye-Laws 2018 (Road Traffic Act 2004 As Amended)
County Wexford Road Traffic Special Speed Limit Bye-Laws 2018 (Road Traffic Act 2004 as Amended) DRAFT (Adopted on the __ of ________ 2018) County Wexford Road Traffic Special Speed Limit Bye Laws 2018 DRAFT Section Contents Page 1. Definitions and General Information 4 2. Repeals 6 3. Citation 6 4. Enniscorthy Municipal District 7 Special Speed Limits 4.1 First Schedule 20 km/h 4.2 Second Schedule 30 km/h 4.3 Third Schedule 40 km/h 4.4 Fourth Schedule 50 km/h 4.5 Fifth Schedule 60 km/h 4.6 Sixth Schedule 80 km/h 4.7 Seventh Schedule 100 km/h 4.8 Eighth Schedule 120 km/h Periodic Speed Limits 4.9 Ninth Schedule 30 km/h 4.10 Tenth Schedule 40 km/h 5. Gorey Municipal District 30 Special Speed Limits 5.1 First Schedule 20 km/h 5.2 Second Schedule 30 km/h 5.3 Third Schedule 40 km/h 5.4 Fourth Schedule 50 km/h 5.5 Fifth Schedule 60 km/h 5.6 Sixth Schedule 80 km/h 5.7 Seventh Schedule 100 km/h 5.8 Eighth Schedule 120 km/h Periodic Speed Limits 5.9 Ninth Schedule 30 km/h 5.10 Tenth Schedule 40 km/h 2 | P a g e County Wexford Road Traffic Special Speed Limit Bye Laws 2018 DRAFT 6. New Ross Municipal District 53 Special Speed Limits 6.1 First Schedule 20 km/h 6.2 Second Schedule 30 km/h 6.3 Third Schedule 40 km/h 6.4 Fourth Schedule 50 km/h 6.5 Fifth Schedule 60km/h 6.6 Sixth Schedule 80 km/h 6.7 Seventh Schedule 100 km/h 6.8 Eighth Schedule 120 km/h Periodic Speed Limits 6.9 Ninth Schedule 30 km/h 6.10 Tenth Schedule 40 km/h 7. -
In the Greater Carlow Town Area Identification of Suitable Sites For
Identification of Suitable Sites for the Location of a Logistics Park in the Greater Carlow Town Area FINAL CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background to this Document 1.2 Structure of this Document 2.0 DESCRIPTION 2.1 Definition 2.1.1 Examples of Logistics Parks in Ireland 2.2 Location of Logistics Parks 2.2.1 Strategic Planning Considerations 2.2.2 Local Planning Considerations 2.2.3 Transport Links and Quality 2.2.4 Multi and Inter Modality Potential 3.0 SITE SELECTION 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Methodology 3.3 Site Selection 3.3.1 Step One: Creating Catchments 3.3.2 Step Two: Catchments and Development Exclusion Zones Overlain 3.3.3 Step Three: Application of Constraints Criteria 3.4 Identified Sites 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF IDENTIFIED SITES 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Description of Sites 4.2.1 Site A 4.2.2 Site B 4.3 Selection of a Preferred Site 5.0 CONCLUSION | Study of Possible Sites for the Location of a Logistics Park Proximate to Carlow Town 1 Executive summary This document presents an assessment tool in identifying the most appropriate site for the location of a logistics park in the greater Carlow Town area. It first defines a logistics park and then identifies the locational requirements necessary to accommodate such a use. A Geographical Information System (GIS) is used to identify a series of catchment areas for desirable locational requirements such as roads, rail and services infrastructure. The GIS is also used to determine a series of development exclusion zones around heritage items. -
M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme
M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief of Evidence (Including Traffic, Non-agricultural Material Assets, Waste, Hydrology, Inter-relationships & Cumulative Impacts) by Eileen McCarthy BE., MICE, MIEI, PE Main Brief / FINAL M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief 1. Introduction 1.1 My name is Eileen McCarthy. I am an Associate Director with Arup. I hold an honours degree in Civil Engineering from University College Cork (UCC) (1987). I am a Chartered Member of the Institute of Civil Engineers in London, a Chartered Member of Engineers Ireland and a licensed professional engineer in USA. 1.2 I have over 25 years relevant experience and in particular, managed the planning and design for various road schemes including M20 Cork – Limerick Motorway Scheme, M7/N24 Ballysimon Road Improvement Scheme, N22 Baile Bhuirne to Macroom scheme and the Naas Southern Ring Road in Kildare. 1.3 I have been directly responsible for the project management of the M7 Osberstown Interchange and R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme since commencement of work on this application to An Bórd Pleanála in October 2012. I will be assisted as required by members of our design team when addressing specific queries which may arise during cross-examination. 1.4 The objective of my brief of evidence is to set the scene at the commencement of this hearing. I am mindful of the Boards direction to avoid repetition of the contents of the Environmental Impact statement, and therefore, make reference to various sections of the EIS throughout as opposed to repetition. -
Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1St Progress Report for Ireland 2014
Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1st Progress Report for Ireland Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1st Progress Report for Ireland 2014 Page 1 of 37 Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1st Progress Report for Ireland Article 17(3) of Directive 2010/40/EU 1st Progress Report for Ireland Section A – Contact details ........................................................................................................................ 3 Section B – General Overview .................................................................................................................... 3 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Section C – National ITS Activities in Priority Area 1 ................................................................................. 4 Optimal use of road, traffic and travel data .......................................................................................... 4 Section D – National ITS Activities in Priority Area 2 ................................................................................. 5 Continuity of traffic and freight management ITS services ................................................................... 5 Section E – National ITS Activities in Priority Area 3 .................................................................................. 6 ITS road safety and security applications ............................................................................................. -
Waterford Bypass
ENGINEERS IRELAND WATERFORD BYPASS WATERFORD BYPASS JOHN T. MURPHY, BE, CEng, FIEI, HDipMM, RConsEI Project Director, Mott MacDonald Ireland JOE SHINKWIN, BE, CEng, MIEI, DipMechEng Project Manager, Mott MacDonald Ireland Presented to a meeting of the Cork Region of Engineers Ireland 23rd February 2010 SYNOPSIS The N25 Waterford Bypass comprises a 16.3 km of dual carriageway bypass of Waterford City, 9.5 km of major link roads and an additional 13 km of side roads. It includes a 465 metre long dual carriageway cable-stayed bridge over the River Suir (with a 230m main span), plus a number of major viaduct and grade separated interchange structures totalling over 50 bridges. This paper describes the development of the current route for the N25 Waterford Bypass including the various phases of route selection. It deals with the project’s inclusion as a pilot PPP project and the development of the PPP contract. It follows the project through the statutory processes (including the discovery of Viking remains and the need to find a new route around the designated national monument site in Woodstown). The paper also describes the selection of the chosen bridge type for the Suir River Crossing and looks at some of the other major structures. Finally, the paper will briefly describe the construction contract and various aspects of construction. 1 MURPHY and SHINKWIN INTRODUCTION crossing of the Suir in the Waterford viii) were evaluated without area would impose costs on, and quantification while items v), vi), and vii) The need for a second river crossing of produce benefits for, the community at were derived in the process of the the River Suir in Waterford has been large. -
8-Strategic-Transport-Assessment.Pdf
Strategic Transport Assessment Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW – NATIONAL , REGIONAL AND LOCAL 3 1.1 Policy Hierarchy 3 1.2 The National Spatial Strategy (NSS) 3 1.2.1 Aims of National Spatial Strategy 3 1.2.2 Transport and the National Spatial Strategy 4 1.2.3 The Regional Planning Guidelines (RPGs) for the West Region 2010-2022 4 1.2.4 Transport and the RPGs 4 1.2.5 Smarter Travel – A Sustainable Transport Future A New Transport Policy for Ireland 2009 - 2020 5 1.2.6 National Cycle Policy Framework 5 1.3 Transport, County and Local Development Plans 5 1.3.1 Local Planning Policy: Settlements and Transportation 5 1.3.2 The County Development Plan - Key Sustainable Development and Transport Policies and Objectives and Specific Objectives 9 1.3.3 Local Planning Policies 9 1.3.4 Local Area Plans and Area Plans- Key Sustainable Development and Transport Objectives and Specific Objectives 9 1.4 Summary 10 Chapter 2 Overview of Road and Rail Transportation Networks National, Regional and Local 11 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 Roads Overview – County Roscommon 15 2.2.1 National Roads 15 2.2.2 Regional Roads 15 2.2.3 Local Roads 15 2.4 Strategic Roads Investment 16 2.4.1 Proposed Roads Projects 16 2.5 The Rail Network – overview 16 Chapter 3 Transport Demand Types 19 3.1 Vehicular Travel 19 3.2 Rail Travel – Overview of Service within County Roscommon 20 3.2.1 Train Schedules 21 3.2.2 Rail Travel for Work Commuters 22 3.2.3 Rail Travel – Recent Patronage Trends 22 3.2.4 Rail Travel