3.4 Sustainable Movement & Transport
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
State of the System September 2019
State of the System September 2019 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. | 0 Table of Contents Service Trends ..................................................................25 Ridership ..................................................................25 Introduction...................................................................... 2 Service Hours ............................................................26 CAT 2020 ................................................................... 2 Productivity ..............................................................26 State of the System ..................................................... 2 Cost .........................................................................27 Overview of Existing Services............................................... 3 Policies and Procedures .....................................................28 Urban ....................................................................... 3 Ends of Lines .............................................................28 Suburban................................................................... 3 Blocking ...................................................................28 Suburban Limited ....................................................... 4 Service Changes and Implementation ...........................28 Commuter Express ...................................................... 4 Public Notice .............................................................28 Express..................................................................... -
County Wexford Road Traffic Special Speed Limit Bye-Laws 2018 (Road Traffic Act 2004 As Amended)
County Wexford Road Traffic Special Speed Limit Bye-Laws 2018 (Road Traffic Act 2004 as Amended) DRAFT (Adopted on the __ of ________ 2018) County Wexford Road Traffic Special Speed Limit Bye Laws 2018 DRAFT Section Contents Page 1. Definitions and General Information 4 2. Repeals 6 3. Citation 6 4. Enniscorthy Municipal District 7 Special Speed Limits 4.1 First Schedule 20 km/h 4.2 Second Schedule 30 km/h 4.3 Third Schedule 40 km/h 4.4 Fourth Schedule 50 km/h 4.5 Fifth Schedule 60 km/h 4.6 Sixth Schedule 80 km/h 4.7 Seventh Schedule 100 km/h 4.8 Eighth Schedule 120 km/h Periodic Speed Limits 4.9 Ninth Schedule 30 km/h 4.10 Tenth Schedule 40 km/h 5. Gorey Municipal District 30 Special Speed Limits 5.1 First Schedule 20 km/h 5.2 Second Schedule 30 km/h 5.3 Third Schedule 40 km/h 5.4 Fourth Schedule 50 km/h 5.5 Fifth Schedule 60 km/h 5.6 Sixth Schedule 80 km/h 5.7 Seventh Schedule 100 km/h 5.8 Eighth Schedule 120 km/h Periodic Speed Limits 5.9 Ninth Schedule 30 km/h 5.10 Tenth Schedule 40 km/h 2 | P a g e County Wexford Road Traffic Special Speed Limit Bye Laws 2018 DRAFT 6. New Ross Municipal District 53 Special Speed Limits 6.1 First Schedule 20 km/h 6.2 Second Schedule 30 km/h 6.3 Third Schedule 40 km/h 6.4 Fourth Schedule 50 km/h 6.5 Fifth Schedule 60km/h 6.6 Sixth Schedule 80 km/h 6.7 Seventh Schedule 100 km/h 6.8 Eighth Schedule 120 km/h Periodic Speed Limits 6.9 Ninth Schedule 30 km/h 6.10 Tenth Schedule 40 km/h 7. -
Chapter 7: Infrastructure
Navan Development Plan 2009-2015 November 2009 CHAPTER 7: INFRASTRUCTURE SECTIONS IN THIS CHAPTER 7.1 Transportation-Introduction 7.2 Goals 7.3 Roads 7.4 Pedestrians and Cyclists 7.5 Public Transport 7.6 Park & Ride, Parking, Loading & Taxi Ranks 7.7 Street Furniture & Lighting 7.8 Keeping the Street Clean 7.9 Water Supply & Sewerage Treatment & Disposal 7.10 Flooding 7.11 Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems 7.12 Telecommunications 7.13 Broadband 7.14 Solid Waste Collection & Disposal 7.15 Energy 161 Navan Development Plan 2009-2015 November 2009 7.1 Transportation-Introduction The context for this chapter is provided in Chapter Two of this Development Plan. The key to Navan’s sustainable growth is the development of an integrated land use and transportation system which provides for a development pattern that protects Navan’s architectural and natural heritage while providing for growth and economic development. The integration of land use and transportation policies, both in the town centre and outer suburban areas underpins the transportation strategy as outlined below. 7.2 Goals It is the goal of Navan Town Council and Meath County Council to create vibrant urban areas with good provision of public transport, reduced traffic congestion and an attractive urban centre, which is not dominated by the car. It is the main objective of the Planning Authorities to create an integrated and environmentally sound system, with particular emphasis on: Accessibility and choice of transport for all; Strong integration between transportation planning -
Terminology and Basic Relationships
II. Terminology and Basic RltiRelationshi ps Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction II-1 WORLD BANK Planning and Analysis Bu ilding Blocks Schedule Cost Analysis and Building Financial Planning Performance Analysis Measures & Standards Service Monitoring and Data Collection Network and Route Design Fares and Revenue: Policy, Analysis, and Collection Market Factors Terminology and Focus of and Demand Analysis Basic Relationships Discussion II-2 II-2 WORLD BANK Basic Public Transport Terms SiService OtOutpu t • Route Alignment • Ridership • Terminal (Route) • Commercial • Garage (Parking Hours/KM and Maintenance) • Dead Hours/KM • Span of Service • Vehicle Hours/KM • Interval (Frequency) • Vehicle Capacity • Time • Passengers at – Running Maximum Load – Terminal Point – ClCycle • Bus Requirements II-3 WORLD BANK Comments on Terminology • Public transport systems sometimes use different terms to define the same operating concepts • This presentation uses common terminology found in many countries II-4 WORLD BANK Route Alignment Path Over Which the Bus Travels • BlBalance btbetween coverage an ddid direct ness • Maybe different alignments based on time of day • Some systems give new route name to each separate alignment and/or direction Megabus Pereira II-5 WORLD BANK Terminal The end of a route • May be shared by several routes • May also be served by different modes – Intercity bus or feeder • Bus stations often provided at major terminals Megabus Station BMTC KSB Station II-6 WORLD BANK Garage (Parking and Maintenance) -
M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme
M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief of Evidence (Including Traffic, Non-agricultural Material Assets, Waste, Hydrology, Inter-relationships & Cumulative Impacts) by Eileen McCarthy BE., MICE, MIEI, PE Main Brief / FINAL M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief 1. Introduction 1.1 My name is Eileen McCarthy. I am an Associate Director with Arup. I hold an honours degree in Civil Engineering from University College Cork (UCC) (1987). I am a Chartered Member of the Institute of Civil Engineers in London, a Chartered Member of Engineers Ireland and a licensed professional engineer in USA. 1.2 I have over 25 years relevant experience and in particular, managed the planning and design for various road schemes including M20 Cork – Limerick Motorway Scheme, M7/N24 Ballysimon Road Improvement Scheme, N22 Baile Bhuirne to Macroom scheme and the Naas Southern Ring Road in Kildare. 1.3 I have been directly responsible for the project management of the M7 Osberstown Interchange and R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme since commencement of work on this application to An Bórd Pleanála in October 2012. I will be assisted as required by members of our design team when addressing specific queries which may arise during cross-examination. 1.4 The objective of my brief of evidence is to set the scene at the commencement of this hearing. I am mindful of the Boards direction to avoid repetition of the contents of the Environmental Impact statement, and therefore, make reference to various sections of the EIS throughout as opposed to repetition. -
Using Multi-Criteria Analysis to Identify Suitable Light Rail Transit Route
Jurnal Alam Bina, Jilid 09, No; 01, 2007. USING MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY SUITABLE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT ROUTE Ahmad Nazri Muhamad Ludin, Siti Noor Haslinda Mohd Latip Email: [email protected] Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, University Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia ABSTRACT Public transportation planning and development are undergoing continuous changes often prompted by both external factors and policy-directed responses. The role of public transit, particularly rail transit, becomes increasingly importance with the changing demographic and economic pattern. The trend of returning to urban living for example, has significantly increased the demand for efficient public transportation in urban centers. However, the design and development of Light Rail Transit (LRT) route seldom takes into consideration land use changes and demand. This paper investigates how non-spatial and spatial data can be integrated within a multi criteria decision framework to formulate and evaluate land use development corridor to determine suitable route for LRT. A raster base multi-criteria analysis model was developed base on a set and specific objectives, criteria, indicator and data requirement. The set criteria and indicator proposed are in line with the objectives to improve public transportation as stipulated in the Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan. A case study approach is undertaken within a selected LRT railroad in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The model, integrating GIS and external software, shows that suitable LRT alignment can be identified that take into account social, institutional and environmental objectives. The approach will assist in the planning and development of LRT network, and thus maximizing usage of rail-based public transport to serve the community. -
A Transit-Center-Based Approach
56 Transportation Research Record 798 Redesigning Urban Transit Systems: A Transit-Center-Based Approach JERRY B. SCHNEIDER AND STEPHEN P. SMITH Current metropolitan travel patterns in American cities are examined. The in· systems are extremely limited in serving multidesti ability of highly downtown-focused (radial) transit networks to meet metropoli· national travel. Most riders who desire to reach tan travel desires in American cities is described. In addition, the limitations non-CBD destinations in a radial system are required of the grid network approach to route planning are critiqued. A transit net to travel to the downtown, transfer, and then travel work that is designed to converge on a few strategically located transit centers back out again to the final destination. A rider is recommended as having the greatest potential to serve the multidestinational travel demand that characterizes American cities. A planning framework de· seeking a destination that may be no more than 3 km signed to oid planner.sin the preparation of plans for a translt-i:enter-based (2 miles) from his or her origin may be forced to transit system is outlined. Its koy element is the strategic location of a few make a 15-km (10-mile), 50-min transit trip. transit centers at major activity centers. Regional shopping centers are sug Clearly, this is not a service that is likely to gested as ideal sites for transit-center locations. The center-based transit net capture a significant share of the non-CBD-bound work is assessed critically from operational, financial, and political perspec· travel market. -
FARMINGTON AVENUE 506 | Downtown New Britain
DRAFT Route Evaluation FARMINGTON AVENUE 506 | Downtown New Britain Service Design Route 506 is a radial route, providing service between Downtown New Britain and UConn Health/John Dempsey Hospital in Farmington. The route operates primarily on Washington Street, Farmington Avenue, Fienemann Road, Colt Highway, and Birdseye Road. FIGURE 1 | ROUTE MAP | 1 DRAFT System Interaction and Transfer Opportunities Route 506 originates in downtown New Britain, near the intersection of Bank Street and Main Street and the Downtown New Britain CTfastrak station, and terminates at the UConn Health Center Outpatient Pavilion. From downtown New Britain riders can transfer to nearly all other CTtransit routes serving New Britain, as well as CTfastrak routes for service to Hartford. In addition, Route 506 also has transfer opportunities with Route 66 and Route 121 at multiple locations on the campus of the UConn Health Center in Farmington and with Route 902 on Farm Springs Road (Figure 2). FIGURE 2 | TRANSFER OPPORTUNITIES TRANSFER TO SERVING Route 66 Hartford and Unionville Route 121 Farmington, Newington, Hartford, East Hartford Route 902 Downtown Hartford, New Britain, Farmington Alignments and Service Patterns The primary alignment of Route 506 travels outbound from downtown New Britain via Main Street and Washington Street. The route follows Washington Street for three blocks, turns right on Lasalle Street, and makes an immediate left turn on to Farmington Avenue. The route travels northwest on Farmington Avenue and continues as the road transitions to Fienemann Road. At Batterson Park Road the route turns right to serve the Batterson Park Road Park and Ride, and then returns to Fienemann Road, traveling west. -
Service Choices Report
JANUARY 22, 2018 SERVICE CHOICES REPORT Prepared by Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 3 Glossary ............................................................................................................... 40 Ridership or Coverage? ................................................................................................................................................ .4 What does planning for ridership mean? ...................................................................................................................... .4 Why are Coverage goals important? ............................................................................................................................ .6 Dividing the Budget by Priorities .................................................................................................................................. .7 Two Questions for the Public ........................................................................................................................................ .8 Next Steps .................................................................................................................................................................... .8 1 Market Assessment ........................................................................................ 9 Activity Density ............................................................................................................................................................ -
N11 Corridor Review Fassaroe Junction to Kilmacanogue, County
N11 Corridor Review Fassaroe Junction to Kilmacanogue, County Wicklow March 2010 The Employer The Engineer National Roads Authority Roughan & O‟Donovan - Aecom St Martin‟s House Alliance Waterloo Road Arena House Ballsbridge Arena Road Dublin 4 Sandyford Dublin 18 Roughan & O‟Donovan - N11 Corridor Review AECOM Alliance Fassaroe to Kilmacanogue N11 Corridor Review Fassaroe to Kilmacanogue March 2010 Document No: ..................... 07.139.039.10A Made: ................................... Kevin Brennan / Eoin Ó Catháin Checked: ............................. Séamus MacGearailt Approved: ........................... Séamus MacGearailt Document No Description Made Checked Approved Date 07.139.039.10A Final KB / EOC SMG SMG Mar 2010 Ref: 07.139.039.10A March 2010 Page i Roughan & O‟Donovan - N11 Corridor Review AECOM Alliance Fassaroe to Kilmacanogue N11 Corridor Review Fassaroe to Kilmacanogue March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ................................................................................. 2 2.1 National Route Context for N11 ................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Historical Development of the N11 Route ................................................................................ 2 2.3 Road Standard ......................................................................................................................... -
DN-GEO-03031 June 2017 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND (TII) PUBLICATIONS
Rural Road Link Design DN-GEO-03031 June 2017 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND (TII) PUBLICATIONS About TII Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) is responsible for managing and improving the country’s national road and light rail networks. About TII Publications TII maintains an online suite of technical publications, which is managed through the TII Publications website. The contents of TII Publications is clearly split into ‘Standards’ and ‘Technical’ documentation. All documentation for implementation on TII schemes is collectively referred to as TII Publications (Standards), and all other documentation within the system is collectively referred to as TII Publications (Technical). Document Attributes Each document within TII Publications has a range of attributes associated with it, which allows for efficient access and retrieval of the document from the website. These attributes are also contained on the inside cover of each current document, for reference. TII Publication Title Rural Road Link Design TII Publication Number DN-GEO-03031 Activity Design (DN) Document Set Standards Stream Geometry (GEO) Publication Date June 2017 Document 03031 Historical NRA TD 9 Number Reference TII Publications Website This document is part of the TII publications system all of which is available free of charge at http://www.tiipublications.ie. For more information on the TII Publications system or to access further TII Publications documentation, please refer to the TII Publications website. TII Authorisation and Contact Details This document -
10 TRANSPORTATION 10.1 Transport Network and Infrastructure 10.1.1
10 TRANSPORTATION 10.1 Transport Network and Infrastructure 10.1.1 Road Network The majority of inter-city roads in Chile are under the jurisdiction of the Road Department of MOP, except for urban streets and some private roads belonging to the mining and forestry companies. They are classified in five categories: • Class A: National Roads including Route 5 and other trunk roads connecting Route 5 to regional capitals, ports and/or major marine customs as well as international airports. • Class B: Primary Regional Roads are trunk roads not classified as national roads, connecting a national road to a province capital or to three communal capitals and those connecting provincial capitals to two communal capitals or frontiers. • Class C: Secondary Regional Roads are roads not classified as national or primary regional roads, and have access to communal capitals and areas populated by over 1,500 habitants. • Class D and E: Primary and Secondary Communal Roads are roads not classified as national or regional roads. The road network classified by the Class A, B and C is called the basic network. In 1998, the total length of public roads was 79,200 km, while the basic network was composed of 23,382 km, accounting for 30% of the total (Table 10.1.1). Figure 10.1.1 shows the basic network that is dominated by the north-south stretch of Route 5, due to the long and narrow shape of the nation. Figure 10.1.2 shows regional road length by surface type. Since the mid-1980s, the Government has given approximately of total infrastructure investment to the road sector, emphasizing road improvement rather than road construction.