DOCSLIB.ORG

The Influence of Service Planning Decisions on Rail Transit Success June 2009 Or Failure 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MTI The InfluenceThe of ServiceTransitPlanning Failure DecisionsSuccess or on Rail Funded by U.S. Department of Transportation and California The Influence of Service Planning Department of Transportation Decisions on Rail Transit Success or Failure MTI ReportMTI 08-04 MTI Report 08-04 June 2009 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) was established by Congress as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Reauthorized in 1998, MTI was selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation through a competitive process in 2002 as a national “Center of Excellence.” The Institute is funded by Con- MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES gress through the United States Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, the Califor- nia Legislature through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Honorary Co-Chair Rebecca Brewster Steve Heminger Stephanie Pinson Hon. James Oberstar ** President/COO Executive Director President/COO American Transportation Metropolitan Transportation Gilbert Tweed Associates, Inc. The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Chair House Transportation and Research Institute Commission New York, NY transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs Smyrna, GA Oakland, CA Infrastructure Committee Hans Rat and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home. The Board provides House of Representatives Donald H. Camph Hon. John Horsley # Secretary General policy direction, assists with needs assessment, and connects the Institute and its programs with the international transportation Washington, DC President Executive Director Union Internationale des California Institute for community. American Association of State Transports Publics Technology Exchange Honorary Co-Chair Highway & Transportation Bruxelles, Belgium ** Los Angeles, CA MTI’s transportation policy work is centered on three primary responsibilities: Hon. John L. Mica Officials (AASHTO) Ranking Member Washington, DC Vickie Shaffer Anne P. Canby House Transportation and General Manager President Infrastructure Committee Joseph Boardman Tri-State Transit Authority Surface Transportation President/CEO Huntington, WV Research House of Representatives Policy Project Amtrak MTI works to provide policy-oriented research for all levels of of Transportation, MTI delivers its classes over a state-of- Washington, DC Washington, DC 60 Massachusetts Ave., N.E. Paul Toliver # government and the private sector to foster the development the-art videoconference network throughout the state Washington, DC 20002 President David L.Turney * Jane Chmielinski of optimum surface transportation systems. Research areas of California and via webcasting beyond, allowing working New Age Industries Chair/President/CEO President DMJM Harris Will Kempton Seattle, WA include: transportation security; planning and policy develop- transportation professionals to pursue an advanced degree Digital Recorders, Inc. Director ment; interrelationships among transportation, land use, and the regardless of their location. To meet the needs of employ- Dallas, TX New York, NY California Department of Michael S. Townes # environment; transportation finance; and collaborative labor- ers seeking a diverse workforce, MTI’s education program Transportation President/CEO William Dorey management relations. Certified Research Associates conduct promotes enrollment to under-represented groups. William W. Millar ^ Sacramento, CA Transportation District President/CEO the research. Certification requires an advanced degree, gener- Vice Chair/President Commission of Hampton Roads American Public Transportation Granite Construction, Inc. ally a PhD, a record of academic publications, and professional Brian Macleod Hampton, VA Information and Technology Transfer Association (APTA) Watsonville, CA Senior Vice President references. Research projects culminate in a peer-reviewed Washington, DC MTI promotes the availability of completed research to Gillig Corporation Edward Wytkind Mortimer Downey publication, available both in hardcopy and on TransWeb, the professional organizations and journals and works to Hayward, CA President Hon. Rod Diridon, Sr. # Chairman MTI website (http://transweb.sjsu.edu). integrate the research findings into the graduate education Transportation Trades Executive Director PB Consult Inc. program. In addition to publishing the studies, the Institute Dr. Bruce Magid Department, AFL-CIO Mineta Transportation Institute Washington, DC Dean Washington, DC Education also sponsors symposia to disseminate research results to San Jose, CA College of Business The educational goal of the Institute is to provide graduate-level transportation professionals and encourages Research As- Nuria Fernandez San José State University Commissioner education to students seeking a career in the development and sociates to present their findings at conferences. The World Ronald Barnes San José, CA General Manager City of Chicago, Department of Aviation, ** Honorary operation of surface transportation programs. MTI, through San in Motion, MTI’s quarterly newsletter, covers innovation Veolia Transportation/East * Chair José State University, offers an AACSB-accredited Master of Sci- in the Institute’s research and education programs. MTI’s Valley RPTA Chicago, IL ^ Vice Chair # ence in Transportation Management and a graduate Certificate extensive collection of transportation-related publications Mesa, AZ Past Chair in Transportation Management that serve to prepare the nation’s is integrated into San José State University’s world-class transportation managers for the 21st century. The master’s de- Martin Luther King, Jr. Library. Directors Research Associates Policy Oversight Committee gree is the highest conferred by the California State University system. With the active assistance of the California Department Hon. Rod Diridon, Sr. Asha Weinstein Agrawal Ron Sylvia Executive Director Urban and Regional Planning Political Science Dr. Karen E. Philbrick Joe Giglierano Taeho Park Research Director Marketing and Decision Science Organization and Management DISCLAIMER Dr. Peter Haas Dr. Jan Botha Diana Wu The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented here- MTI Director Professor, Dept. of Civil & Research LIbrarian in. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program Environmental Engineering Martin Luther King, Jr. Library San José State University San José State University and the California Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. This report does not necessarily reflect the official Donna Maurillo Communications Director views or policies of the U.S. government, State of California, or the Mineta Transportation Institute, who assume no liability for the contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard specification, design standard, or regulation. MTI REPORT 08-04 THE INFLUENCE OF SERVICE PLANNING DECISION ON RAIL TRANSIT SUCCESS OR FAILURE June 2009 Jeffrey R. Brown, PhD Gregory L. Thompson, PhD a publication of the Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business San José State University San José, CA 95192-0219 Created by Congress in 1991 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-CA-MTI-09-2608 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Influence of Service Planning Decisions on Rail Transit Success June 2009 or Failure 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jeffrey Brown PhD and Gregory L. Thompson, PhD MTI Report 08-04 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business San José State University 11. Contract or Grant No. San José, CA 95192-0219 DTRT07-G-0054 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered California Department of U.S. Department of Transportation Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Sacramento, CA 95815 Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 1200 New Jersey Ave SE, Rm. E33 Washington, DC 20590-0001 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Some United States metropolitan areas with rail transit systems enjoy ridership and productivity success while others do not. This study examines the experiences of 11 U.S. metropolitan areas with between onr million and five million persons to better understand why some areas are successful and others are not. A particular focus is the role of service planning decisions in facilitating transit success. We find that successful transit systems are those that: 1) articulate a clear, multidestination vision for regional transit; 2) rely on rail transit as the system’s backbone; 3) recognize the importance of the non-CBD travel market; 4) encourage the use of transfers to reach a wider array of destinations; 5) recognize that rail transit alone is not enough to guarantee success; and 6) recognize the importance of serving regional destinations. 17. Keywords 18. Distribution Statement Dual mode transportation
Recommended publications
  • TCRP Report 31: Funding Strategies for Public Transportation

    TCRP Report 31: Funding Strategies for Public Transportation

    Station Concessions Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City, New York This page left intentionally blank. Station Concessions Metropolitan Transportation Authority Background Agency Profile Transit systems have many assets which provide attractive business opportunities to the private sector. One of these assets, real estate in high-traffic stations, can provide retailers with a steady stream of potential customers. Both large and small systems can benefit from the productive use of excess space in transit stations. Large transit systems serve thousands of people 169 daily and many small systems have central transfer points through which large numbers of people pass. In high-traffic stations transit agencies can raise funds and provide their riders with conveniences such as food, newspapers, flowers, or dry cleaning through concessions. Case Background For over a century, the transit system in New York City has recognized the value of the premium real estate it Transportation Authority [MTA]), maintained this holds. One of the founders of the system, August Belmont, program to generate revenue from otherwise unused saw concessions as a way to make additional money. When space. This space is licensed to concessionaires — the transit system was purchased by the public sector, the individuals, partnerships, or corporations — who pay city, and since 1953, the New York City Transit Authority rent to occupy space on MTA property. (now part of the Metropolitan Transit Cooperative Research Program While concessions can exist at any high-density safer in subway stations than on the streets of New York station, in New York, concessions are concentrated in City. about one-fourth of the 470 stations of the New York subway system.
  • Meeting Notice and Agenda

    Meeting Notice and Agenda

    MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP The SPRINTER Smart Growth Working Group may take action on any item appearing on this agenda. Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. City of San Marcos, Valley of Discovery Room 1 Civic Center Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 Staff Contacts: Susan Baldwin and Christine Eary (619) 699-1943; (619) 699-6928 [email protected]; [email protected] AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS • DEBRIEF FROM SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR • I-PLACE3S SKETCH MODELING TOOL • SPRINTER SERVICE PLAN AND BUS COORDINATION SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 1-800-COMMUTE or see www.sdcommute.com for route information. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP Wednesday, April 11, 2007 ITEM # RECOMMENDATION 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS +2. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP MEETING APPROVE SUMMARY The Working Group should review and approve the January 31, 2007, Meeting Summary. REPORTS (3 through 6) 3. DEBRIEF FROM SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR (WG members) DISCUSS Working Group (WG) members will have the opportunity to share comments and questions regarding the station area sites visited during the SPRINTER tour on March 14. Working Group members are asked to comment on site constraints common among the station areas, and strategies being implemented to address those constraints.
  • 3.4 Sustainable Movement & Transport

    3.4 Sustainable Movement & Transport

    3.4 Sustainable Movement & Transport 3.4.3 Challenges & Opportunities cater for occasional use and particularly for families. This in turn impacts on car parking requirements and consequently density levels. A key The Woodbrook-Shanganagh LAP presents a real opportunity to achieve a challenge with be to effectively control parking provision as a travel demand modal shift from the private car to other sustainable transport modes such management measure. 3.4.1 Introduction as walking, cycling and public transport. The challenge will be to secure early and timely delivery of key connections and strategic public transport 3.4.4 The Way Forward Since the original 2006 Woodbrook-Shanganagh LAP, the strategic transport elements - such as the DART Station - so to establish behaviour change from planning policy context has changed considerably with the emergence of a the outset. In essence, the movement strategy for the LAP is to prioritise walking series of higher level policy and guidance documents, as well as new state Shanganagh Park, straddling the two development parcels, creates the and cycling in an environment that is safe, pleasant, accessible and easy agency structures and responsibilities, including the National Transport opportunity for a relatively fine grain of pedestrian and cycle routes to achieve to move about within the neighbourhoods, and where journeys from and Authority (NTA) and Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII). a good level of permeability and connectivity between the sites and to key to the new development area are predominantly by sustainable means of The key policy documents emerging since 2006 include, inter alia: facilities such as the DART Station and Neighbourhood Centre.
  • Miami-Dade & Broward Counties

    Miami-Dade & Broward Counties

    MIAMI-DADE & BROWARD COUNTIES RESIDENTIAL MARKETS Make A Better Move With The Market In Sight. DOWNLOAD CONFERENCE PRESENTATION DOWNLOAD MIAMI-DADE CHARTS & DATA DOWNLOAD BROWARD CHARTS & DATA President & CEO, EWM Realty International | Ron Shuffield Senior Vice President & General Sales Manager, EWM Realty International | Sherrie Porter Senior Vice President, Business Development, EWM Realty International | Patrick O’Connell EDITORIAL Kreps DeMaria PR & Marketing | Israel Kreps Kreps DeMaria PR & Marketing | Caroline Underwood RESEARCH Chief Financial Officer, EWM Realty International | Hena M. Aguirre, CPA Financial Analyst, EWM Realty International | Sanja Shank, MBA TrendGraphix, Inc. DESIGN Director of Marketing, EWM Realty International | Lee S. Casey, MBA SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS Director, Transportation & Public Works, Miami-Dade County | Alice N. Bravo, P.E. Founder & Principal, Washington Economics Group | Dr. J. Antonio Villamil SOUTH FLORIDA SETTING THE GLOBAL PACE EWM Realty International’s 2017 South Florida Real Another key factor to consider is Florida’s booming Estate Market Outlook provides a snapshot of 2016 population growth, which pushed Florida to be results and trends expected to influence the 2017 recognized as the third largest state in the country in residential real estate markets in Miami-Dade and 2014, bypassing New York. Our State is growing by just Broward counties. over 1,000 “net” new residents per day! The latest U.S. Census Bureau data shows that the tri-county area of The proprietary platform from which this information is Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach is now the eighth- gleaned, coupled with insights provided by our internal most populated metropolitan statistical area (MSA) in the research team, affords our readers a one-of-a-kind nation, with the three counties comprising just over six perspective on South Florida’s dynamic residential real million permanent residents, or 30% of the State’s total estate market.
  • Operating and Capital Improvement Budget July 1, 2018 - Jurte 30, 2019 Fiscal Year 2019

    Operating and Capital Improvement Budget July 1, 2018 - Jurte 30, 2019 Fiscal Year 2019

    Operating and Capital Improvement Budget July 1, 2018 - Jurte 30, 2019 Fiscal Year 2019 PortAuthority.o rg This page intentionally left blank Board of Directors Officers Jeffrey W. Letwin, Esq., Chairperson of the Board of Directors Jennifer M. Liptak, Vice Chairperson of the Board of Directors Senator Jim Brewster, Secretary of the Board of Directors Directors Representative Dom Costa Robert J. Kania, Jr. Ann Ogoreuc D. Raja John L. Tague, Jr. Stephanie Turman Robert Vescio Michelle Zmijanac 2 | P a g e Chief Executive Officer Katharine Eagan Kelleman Officers and Assistant General Managers Barry Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer Michael Cetra, Chief Legal Officer Jeffrey Devlin, Chief Information Officer David Huffaker, Chief Development Officer William Miller, Chief Operations Officer James Ritchie, Chief Communications Officer Peter Schenk, Chief Financial Officer Heinz 57 Center 345 Sixth Avenue Floor 3 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2327 (412) 566-5500 www.portauthority.org 3 | P a g e FY 2019 Operating and Capital Table of Contents Improvement Budget Board of Directors ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Officers and Assistant General Managers ..................................................................................................... 3 Regional and Port Authority Profile .............................................................................................................. 6 Allegheny County .....................................................................................................................................
  • Llght Rall Translt Statlon Deslgn Guldellnes

    Llght Rall Translt Statlon Deslgn Guldellnes

    PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT V.4.0 7/20/18 STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) provides public transportation throughout Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The Authority’s 2,600 employees operate, maintain, and support bus, light rail, incline, and paratransit services for approximately 200,000 daily riders. Port Authority is currently focused on enacting several improvements to make service more efficient and easier to use. Numerous projects are either underway or in the planning stages, including implementation of smart card technology, real-time vehicle tracking, and on-street bus rapid transit. Port Authority is governed by an 11-member Board of Directors – unpaid volunteers who are appointed by the Allegheny County Executive, leaders from both parties in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate, and the Governor of Pennsylvania. The Board holds monthly public meetings. Port Authority’s budget is funded by fare and advertising revenue, along with money from county, state, and federal sources. The Authority’s finances and operations are audited on a regular basis, both internally and by external agencies. Port Authority began serving the community in March 1964. The Authority was created in 1959 when the Pennsylvania Legislature authorized the consolidation of 33 private transit carriers, many of which were failing financially. The consolidation included the Pittsburgh Railways Company, along with 32 independent bus and inclined plane companies. By combining fare structures and centralizing operations, Port Authority established the first unified transit system in Allegheny County. Participants Port Authority of Allegheny County would like to thank agency partners for supporting the Light Rail Transportation Station Guidelines, as well as those who participated by dedicating their time and expertise.
  • Proposed Area Route

    Proposed Area Route

    Better Bus Network (West) The route maps include the following information: - Key Destinations: list of places/connections served by the respective transit route - Frequency: buses per hour, listed by peak and off peak and on weekdays and weekend days - Span of Service: time period of operation on weekdays and weekend days - Notes: relationship of proposed Better Bus routes to existing routes Better Bus Route 8 – Brickell-FIU-SW 152 Ave/26 St via SW 8 St Key Destinations: FIU Maidique Campus Metrobus terminal, Brickell Metrorail/ Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 30 30 Sat 30 Sun Off Peak Frequency 30 5:00 AM to Span of 5:00 AM to 12:00 AM Sat Service 12:00 AM 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM Sun Note: Similar route 24/51 routing on west end. Increased frequency all day to FIU. Branch to Coral Way eliminated. Proposed peak only service to provide 15 min frequency from 82 Ave to Brickell. Better Bus Route Peak 8 – Brickell- Westchester via SW 8 St Key Destinations: FIU Maidique Campus Metrobus terminal, Brickell Metrorail/ Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 30 No service Off Peak Frequency No service 6:00 AM to Span of 9:00 AM; No service Service 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM Note: Proposed peak only service to provide 15 min frequency from 82 Ave to Brickell. Better Bus Route 11 – FIU-Downtown via Flagler St Key Destinations: FIU Maidique Campus, Government Center Metrorail / Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 10 10 Sat 15 Sun Off Peak Frequency 10 Span of 24 hours 24 hours Service Note: More frequent service all day to FIU from 20/40 min to 10 min.
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit

    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit

    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
  • 2010 Year in Review from the General Manger

    2010 Year in Review from the General Manger

    2010 Year in Review From the General Manger UTA marked its 40th anniversary in 2010. I am honored to have been part of UTA for more than 30 of those years. I remember when we were a small, 67-bus operation with one garage. Now we are a vibrant, multimodal transit system serving six counties with 118 bus routes, 20 miles of TRAX light rail lines and 44 miles of FrontRunner commuter rail. Despite the current economic challenges, I have never been more excited about our future. We're working hard to place a major transit stop within reach of every resident in the counties we serve. We are even closer to that goal with the FrontLines 2015 program, which will add 25 miles of light rail in Salt Lake County and 45 miles of FrontRunner commuter rail in Salt Lake and Utah counties. In 2010 we completed more than half of the FrontLines 2015 program and announced the openings of the Mid-Jordan and West Valley TRAX lines for summer 2011. We're on track to complete the rest of the lines in this massive project by 2015, as promised. None of these major projects would be possible without the support of community members along the Wasatch Front. So as we celebrate 40 years of service, remember our best years are yet to come. Warm Regards, Michael Allegra General Manager Utah Transit Authority 2010 Progress Frontlines 2015 Progress in 2010 FrontLines 2015 Progress UTA has been busy constructing the largest transit Line Percent Complete project in its history—the $2.8 billion FrontLines 2015 FrontRunner South 74 project—making significant progress in 2010.
  • Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project

    Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project

    Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project Phase One: ENVISION Engagement & Communications Summary Stakeholder Report Back – SPRING 2020 Table of Contents Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project .................................................. 1 Project overview .................................................................................................................. 1 Communications and engagement program overview ........................................................ 2 Phase One: ENVISION overview .......................................................................................... 3 What did we do and who did we talk to? ............................................................................. 4 About the Westbrook Communities Working Group ........................................................... 6 What did we ask through engagement? .............................................................................. 8 What did we hear throughout engagement? ....................................................................... 9 Summary of input received ................................................................................................ 10 What did we do with the input received? ........................................................................... 16 Project next steps .............................................................................................................. 17 Appendix: Participant demographic information .............................................................
  • Rail Monitoring from the Dynamic Response of a Passenger Train

    Rail Monitoring from the Dynamic Response of a Passenger Train

    Rail monitoring from the dynamic response of a passenger train George Lederman1, Jacobo Bielak1, and Hae Young Noh1 1 Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, {G. Lederman [email protected], J. Bielak [email protected], H.Noh [email protected]} ABSTRACT: In this case study, we monitor Pittsburgh’s light rail-network from sensors placed on passenger trains, as a more economical monitoring approach than either visual inspection or inspection with dedicated track vehicles. Over time, we learn how the trains respond to each section of track, then use a data-driven approach to detect changes to the track condition relative to its historical baseline. We instrumented the first train in Fall 2012, and the second train in Summer 2015. We have been continuously collecting data on the trains’ position using GPS and their dynamic response using accelerometers; in addition, we have the track maintenance logs from the light-rail operator. As a validation of our system, we have been able to detect changes in the tracks, which correspond to known maintenance activity. Test Structure and Measured Data Our effective “test structure” is Pittsburgh’s 30km light-rail track network. This network has been pieced together over more than a century; the variety of assets in the system makes it a good test-bed. The network includes bridges, viaducts and tunnels, as well as both street running track and ballasted track. In addition, given Pittsburgh’s temperate climate, we have observed temperatures lower than -20oC and higher than 35oC. a b accelerometer c d e accelerometer Figure 1: Sensor Locations for (a) the train instrumented in 2012.
  • TRAX RED LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route

    TRAX RED LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route

    TRAX RED LINE light rail time schedule & line map TRAX Red Line View In Website Mode The light rail line TRAX Red Line has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Central Pointe: 11:30 PM (2) To Central Pointe: 6:31 PM - 11:16 PM (3) To Daybreak Parkway: 4:42 AM - 10:50 PM (4) To University: 4:51 AM - 5:06 AM (5) To University Medical: 4:46 AM - 10:16 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest TRAX RED LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next TRAX RED LINE light rail arriving. Direction: To Central Pointe TRAX RED LINE light rail Time Schedule 11 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 11:19 PM University Medical Center Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City Tuesday 11:19 PM Fort Douglas Station Wednesday 11:30 PM 200 South Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City Thursday 11:30 PM University South Campus Station Friday 11:30 PM 1790 East South Campus Drive, Salt Lake City Saturday 11:20 PM Stadium Station 1349 East 500 South, Salt Lake City 900 East Station 845 East 400 South, Salt Lake City TRAX RED LINE light rail Info Direction: To Central Pointe Trolley Station Stops: 11 605 E 400 S, Salt Lake City Trip Duration: 26 min Line Summary: University Medical Center, Fort Library Station Douglas Station, University South Campus Station, 217 E 400 S, Salt Lake City Stadium Station, 900 East Station, Trolley Station, Library Station, Courthouse Station, 900 South Courthouse Station Station, Ballpark Station, Central Pointe Station 900 South Station 877 S 200 W, Salt Lake City Ballpark Station 212 W 1300 S, Salt Lake City Central Pointe Station Direction: To Central Pointe TRAX RED LINE light rail Time Schedule 16 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:36 PM - 8:36 PM Monday 6:11 PM - 10:56 PM Daybreak Parkway Station 11383 S Grandville Ave, South Jordan Tuesday 6:11 PM - 10:56 PM South Jordan Parkway Station Wednesday 6:31 PM - 11:16 PM 5600 W.