DOCSLIB.ORG

An Bord Pleanála

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Bord Pleanála An Bord Pleanála ROADS ACTS 1993 to 2007 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTS 2000 to 2011 Cork County Council APPLICATION by the National Roads Authority of St Martin’s House, Ballsbridge, Dublin for approval under section 51 of the Roads Act, 1993, as amended, in accordance with documentation, including an environmental impact statement and a Natura impact statement, lodged with An Bord Pleanála on the 19 th day of July, 2012. PROPOSED ROAD DEVELOPMENT: An improved interchange at the location of the existing Dunkettle Interchange at the intersection of the N8 National Primary Road, the N25 National Primary Road and the N40 National Primary Road in the townlands of Lota, Dunkettle, Inchera, Kilcoolishal and Wallingstown, County Cork comprising: (i) a series of direct road links between the N8 National Primary Road, the N25 National Primary Road and the N40 National Primary Road and links to the R623 Regional Road in Wallingstown and to Burys Bridge in Dunkettle and Kilcoolishal, (ii) one number grade separated junction arrangement at the existing N25 National Primary Road approximately 650 metres to the east of the existing Dunkettle Interchange, (iii) four number roundabouts – two number at the grade separated junction, one number at the tie-in with the existing road network in Dunkettle and Kilcoolishal and one number at the tie-in with the existing road network in Wallingstown, ______________________________________________________________ 04.HA0039 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 5 (iv) 43 number major structures of various forms comprising: - one number overbridge, - seven number underbridges, - two number railway bridges, - one number footbridge, - modification of the northern approach structure to the Jack Lynch Tunnel, - seven number retaining walls, and - 24 number gantries, (v) several culverts where the scheme crosses watercourses or intertidal areas, and (vi) pedestrian and cyclist facilities, together with all ancillary and consequential works associated therewith. DECISION APPROVE the above proposed road development in accordance with the said documentation based on the reasons and considerations under and subject to the conditions set out below. REASONS AND CONSIDERATIONS In reaching its decision in this matter the Board had regard to the information contained in the environmental impact statement and the supplementary information in relation to the proposed Dunkettle Interchange Improvement Motorway Scheme, 2012 submitted to An Bord Pleanála on the 14 th day of November, 2012, the 15 th day of November, 2012 and the 9th day of January, 2013, the submissions made in relation to the likely effects on the environment of the said proposed scheme and the report of the person who conducted the oral hearing, and had regard in particular to: (a) the strategic role of the Dunkettle Interchange Improvement Motorway Scheme, 2012 in facilitating connectivity in the national road network on the Atlantic Corridor route the provision of which is an objective in the Southern and Eastern Regional Operational Programme provided for in the National Development Plan 2007-2013, the National Spatial ______________________________________________________________ 04.HA0039 An Bord Pleanála Page 2 of 5 Strategy for Ireland 2002-2020 and the Regional Planning Guidelines for the South-West Region 2010-2022, (b) the provisions of the Cork Area Strategic Plan 2001-2020, the Cork County Development Plan 2009, the Cork City Development Plan 2009-2015 and the Blarney Electoral Area Local Area Plan 2011, (c) the level of congestion currently being experienced at the interchange, (d) the proposals for improvements to the local road network including access to and from Little Island, (e) the proposals to facilitate future access to a local railway station and park and ride facilities, (f) the proposals for dedicated cycle and pedestrian connectivity through the proposed road development, (g) the environmental sensitivity of the site of the proposed road development and its environs, and (h) the nature and extent of the mitigation measures set out in the environmental impact statement received by An Bord Pleanála on the 19 th day of July, 2012, and as set out in the revised schedule of environmental commitments submitted to the oral hearing on the 9th day of January, 2013. Having regard to the nature, scale and design of the proposed road development, the environmental impact statement submitted with the application, the submissions on file and received at the oral hearing and the Inspector’s assessment of environmental impacts, which is noted, the Board completed an environmental impact assessment and concluded that the proposed road development would not be likely to have significant adverse effects on the environment. Having regard to the nature, scale and design of the proposed road development, the Natura impact statement submitted with the application, the submissions on file and received at the oral hearing and the Inspector’s assessment, which is noted, the Board completed an appropriate assessment of the impacts of the proposed road development on the Blackwater River candidate Special Area of Conservation, the Great Island Special Area of Conservation and the Cork Harbour Special Protection Area. The Board concluded that the proposed road development, in itself or in combination with ______________________________________________________________ 04.HA0039 An Bord Pleanála Page 3 of 5 other plans or projects, would not adversely affect the integrity of the European sites in view of the conservation objectives for those sites. It is considered that, subject to compliance with the conditions set out below, the proposed road development would not have significant negative environmental effects on the residential, farming and business community in the vicinity of the scheme, would be acceptable in terms of the resulting visual and landscape impacts and would, therefore, be in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. CONDITIONS 1. The proposed road development shall be carried out in accordance with the plans, drawings and documentation submitted with the application and at the oral hearing, including the environmental impact statement and Natura impact statement, supporting documentation, and revised schedule of environmental commitments submitted to the oral hearing on the 9 th day of January, 2013. Reason: In the interest of clarity and to mitigate the environmental effects of the proposed road development, and to protect the amenities of properties in the vicinity. 2. The applicant shall provide for and adhere to the following requirements in the proposed road development: (a) Following commissioning of the proposed road development, the National Roads Authority shall, at intervals not exceeding twenty four months, review and upgrade the regional traffic model. At each review the road authority shall, in addition to measurement of traffic flows and validation of the model, include specific inputs for extant grants of planning permission within the Cork Metropolitan area. It shall publish this traffic flow information on the website of the National Roads Authority, and (b) Within six months of the date of the Board Order an automatic traffic counter shall be provided on a permanent basis on the N40 National Primary Road in close proximity to the Jack Lynch Tunnel to provide on-going recording and monitoring of traffic flows. Reason: To provide for on-going monitoring and review of traffic flows on the road network at the interchange, in order to indicate capacity to ______________________________________________________________ 04.HA0039 An Bord Pleanála Page 4 of 5 facilitate traffic generated by additional development, having particular regard to the capacity constraints of the Jack Lynch Tunnel. 3. The proposed cycle path from the Dunkettle roundabout extending along Link T1 shall be omitted in its entirety. Reason: The Board has concerns regarding this proposed cycle route from the perspectives of potential for conflict/accidents and inefficiencies in traffic flow. The Board considered that there may be preferable cycle routes available to cater for those travelling from Dunkettle roundabout to Little Island such as across the tunnel to the East following a route which avoids the busiest junctions and roads and which might be pursued by the National Roads Authority. Member of An Bord Pleanála duly authorised to authenticate the seal of the Board. Dated this day of 2013. ______________________________________________________________ 04.HA0039 An Bord Pleanála Page 5 of 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7: Infrastructure
    Navan Development Plan 2009-2015 November 2009 CHAPTER 7: INFRASTRUCTURE SECTIONS IN THIS CHAPTER 7.1 Transportation-Introduction 7.2 Goals 7.3 Roads 7.4 Pedestrians and Cyclists 7.5 Public Transport 7.6 Park & Ride, Parking, Loading & Taxi Ranks 7.7 Street Furniture & Lighting 7.8 Keeping the Street Clean 7.9 Water Supply & Sewerage Treatment & Disposal 7.10 Flooding 7.11 Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems 7.12 Telecommunications 7.13 Broadband 7.14 Solid Waste Collection & Disposal 7.15 Energy 161 Navan Development Plan 2009-2015 November 2009 7.1 Transportation-Introduction The context for this chapter is provided in Chapter Two of this Development Plan. The key to Navan’s sustainable growth is the development of an integrated land use and transportation system which provides for a development pattern that protects Navan’s architectural and natural heritage while providing for growth and economic development. The integration of land use and transportation policies, both in the town centre and outer suburban areas underpins the transportation strategy as outlined below. 7.2 Goals It is the goal of Navan Town Council and Meath County Council to create vibrant urban areas with good provision of public transport, reduced traffic congestion and an attractive urban centre, which is not dominated by the car. It is the main objective of the Planning Authorities to create an integrated and environmentally sound system, with particular emphasis on: Accessibility and choice of transport for all; Strong integration between transportation planning
    [Show full text]
  • Waterford Bypass
    ENGINEERS IRELAND WATERFORD BYPASS WATERFORD BYPASS JOHN T. MURPHY, BE, CEng, FIEI, HDipMM, RConsEI Project Director, Mott MacDonald Ireland JOE SHINKWIN, BE, CEng, MIEI, DipMechEng Project Manager, Mott MacDonald Ireland Presented to a meeting of the Cork Region of Engineers Ireland 23rd February 2010 SYNOPSIS The N25 Waterford Bypass comprises a 16.3 km of dual carriageway bypass of Waterford City, 9.5 km of major link roads and an additional 13 km of side roads. It includes a 465 metre long dual carriageway cable-stayed bridge over the River Suir (with a 230m main span), plus a number of major viaduct and grade separated interchange structures totalling over 50 bridges. This paper describes the development of the current route for the N25 Waterford Bypass including the various phases of route selection. It deals with the project’s inclusion as a pilot PPP project and the development of the PPP contract. It follows the project through the statutory processes (including the discovery of Viking remains and the need to find a new route around the designated national monument site in Woodstown). The paper also describes the selection of the chosen bridge type for the Suir River Crossing and looks at some of the other major structures. Finally, the paper will briefly describe the construction contract and various aspects of construction. 1 MURPHY and SHINKWIN INTRODUCTION crossing of the Suir in the Waterford viii) were evaluated without area would impose costs on, and quantification while items v), vi), and vii) The need for a second river crossing of produce benefits for, the community at were derived in the process of the the River Suir in Waterford has been large.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Review and Update of the Limerick 2030 Plan Ce
    Interim Review and Update of the Limerick 2030 Plan Ce Prepared for Limerick City and County Council 26 June 2021 © 2021 KPMG, an Irish partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by 0 guarantee. All rights reserved. Disclaimer If you are a party other than Limerick City and County Council: KPMG owes you no duty (whether in contract or in tort or under statute or otherwise) with respect to or in connection with the attached report or any part thereof; and will have no liability to you for any loss or damage suffered or costs incurred by you or any other person arising out of or in connection with the provision to you of the attached report or any part thereof, however the loss or damage is caused, including, but not limited to, as a result of negligence. If you are a party other than the Limerick City and County Council and you choose to rely upon the attached report or any part thereof, you do so entirely at your own risk. This document is an initial draft report. Our final report and any other deliverables will take precedence over this document. © 2021 KPMG, an Irish partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by 1 guarantee. All rights reserved. Introduction 2 Contents The contacts at KPMG in connection Page with this report are: Introduction 2 Executive summary 8 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Limerick | Shannon METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2040 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    Bonneagar Iompair Eireann Transport Infrastructure Ireland Draft Limerick | Shannon METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2040 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS National Transport Authority: Limerick City and County Council: Jacobs: Hugh Creegan Brian Kennedy John Paul FitzGerald David Clements Dan Slavin Kevin Burke Michael MacAree Maria Woods Marjely Caneva Jari Howard Jennifer Egan Transport Infrastructure Ireland: Robert Gallagher Sarah Cooper Martin Bourke Dara McGuigan Stephen Johnson Michael McCormack Tim Fitzgerald Colm Kelly Tara Spain Clare County Council Systra: Carmel Kirby Ian Byrne Liam Conneally Allanah Murphy Sean Lenihan Paul Hussey Ann Cronin Andrew Archer Brian McCarthy Sinead Canny John Leahy Tadgh McNamara Dolphin 3D Photomontages: Philip Watkin Date of publication: June 2020 Draft Limerick | Shannon METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORT STRATEGY The Strategy will deliver a high-quality, accessible, integrated and more sustainable transport network that supports the role of the Limerick-Shannon Metropolitan Area as the major growth engine of the Mid-West Region, an internationally competitive European city region and main international entry to the Atlantic Corridor. CONTENTS 01 Introduction 03 02 Policy Context 09 03 Study Area & Transport Context 19 04 Land Use 25 05 Strategy Development 29 06 Walking 33 07 Cycling 43 08 BusConnects 51 09 Rail 59 10 Roads and Streets 65 11 Parking 73 12 Freight, Delivery and Servicing 79 13 Supporting Measures 83 14 Implementation 91 15 Strategy Outcomes 95 2 LIMERICK SHANNON | METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORT STRATEGY 01 INTRODUCTION The Limerick-Shannon Metropolitan To mitigate this, land use and transport planning A flexible strategy with the ability to scale up Area Transport Strategy will be will be far more closely aligned.
    [Show full text]
  • Burren Signage Plan
    Burren Signage Plan A report commissioned by Burren Connect, a project funded by Fáilte Ireland, in partnership with Clare County Council, Shannon Development, National Parks & Wildlife Service, National Monuments Service and Burren Beo.. BURREN SIGNAGE PLAN Executive Summary The Burren Signage Plan is a component of the Burren Connect Project, a multi- agency tourism development project for the Burren. Field surveys and a public consultation programme were carried out during May and June of 2007. The signage plan is based on a set of fourteen principles that emerged from consultation, assessments of the Burren landscape and a review of practice elsewhere. The plan recommends that signage in the Burren countryside is kept to a minimum in recognition of the exceptional quality of the landscape. It recommends that primary reliance for navigation is placed on the standard directional road signs, which are in the process of being upgraded on all the national and regional roads in North Clare. The plan considers that there is a place for visitor signage in the Burren, but that signage and visitor information in general should, as far as possible, be concentrated in and near existing villages, at major junctions and at the larger established visitor sites. The plan recommends caution in deploying signage for new recreation initiatives such as looped walks and cycle routes in the remoter areas of the Burren. The Burren does not lend itself to precise geographical definition but a signage plan has to enable drivers and other visitors to be able to answer the question ‘Are we there yet?’ The plan recommends adopting the settlements that ring the area as boundary markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy on the Provision of Tourist and Leisure Signage on National Roads
    NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY POLICY ON THE PROVISION OF TOURIST AND LEISURE SIGNAGE ON NATIONAL ROADS REVISION 1 MARCH 2011 Index Part 1: Background. ................................................................................................................... 1 Part 2: Classification of Tourist / Leisure Destinations. ........................................................... 3 2.1.1 Tourist / Leisure Attractions. ................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Tourist / Leisure Facilities. ....................................................................................... 3 Part 3: Tourist & Leisure Signage Policy. .................................................................................. 4 3.1 Policy Objectives. ............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Categorisation of National Roads. ................................................................................... 4 3.3 Tourist / Leisure Destinations. ......................................................................................... 5 3.3.1 Motorways and Dual Carriageways. ........................................................................ 6 3.3.2 Other National Primary Roads. ................................................................................ 7 3.3.3 National Secondary Roads. ...................................................................................... 7 3.3.4 Continuity Signage for Tourist Destinations. ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dunkettle Interchange Improvement Scheme
    An Bord Pleanála Board Reference: MA0011/HA0039 Dunkettle Interchange Improvement Scheme REPORT OF MR. D. O’CONNOR ON THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS OF THE SCHEME: - • Transportation issues, including alternatives, prediction of traffic impacts and interaction of car base travel with public transport, cycling and walking. • Drainage issues and associated impacts. • Noise impacts including air quality associated with the construction and operational phases. • Construction issues and impacts. • Interactions of the above with other environmental issues. _____________________________________________________________________ PL.MA0011 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 43 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF REPORT This report examines the aspects of the scheme listed above. Section 2.0 contains a description of parts of the Oral Hearing which are relevant to traffic, noise, construction and drainage. In Section 3.0 there are lists of questions posed which require to be examined in the assessment of the scheme. Section 4.0 is the assessment of the issues and Section 5.0 contains conclusions and recommendations. _____________________________________________________________________ PL.MA0011 An Bord Pleanála Page 2 of 43 2.0 ORAL HEARING BRIEFS OF EVIDENCE AS RELATING TO THE ISSUES TO BE COVERED BY THIS REPORT 2.1 The oral hearing took place on the 14 th and 15 th December, 2012 and on 9 th January 2013 and five briefs of evidence were presented. On Day 1 of the hearing, following an introduction (pages 1-8, transcript) the brief of Mr. Alan McGinley was the first to be read into evidence. Mr. McGinley’s brief of evidence also covered the evidence prepared by Mr. Euan Barr in relation to traffic issues.
    [Show full text]
  • N11 Corridor Review Fassaroe Junction to Kilmacanogue, County
    N11 Corridor Review Fassaroe Junction to Kilmacanogue, County Wicklow March 2010 The Employer The Engineer National Roads Authority Roughan & O‟Donovan - Aecom St Martin‟s House Alliance Waterloo Road Arena House Ballsbridge Arena Road Dublin 4 Sandyford Dublin 18 Roughan & O‟Donovan - N11 Corridor Review AECOM Alliance Fassaroe to Kilmacanogue N11 Corridor Review Fassaroe to Kilmacanogue March 2010 Document No: ..................... 07.139.039.10A Made: ................................... Kevin Brennan / Eoin Ó Catháin Checked: ............................. Séamus MacGearailt Approved: ........................... Séamus MacGearailt Document No Description Made Checked Approved Date 07.139.039.10A Final KB / EOC SMG SMG Mar 2010 Ref: 07.139.039.10A March 2010 Page i Roughan & O‟Donovan - N11 Corridor Review AECOM Alliance Fassaroe to Kilmacanogue N11 Corridor Review Fassaroe to Kilmacanogue March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ................................................................................. 2 2.1 National Route Context for N11 ................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Historical Development of the N11 Route ................................................................................ 2 2.3 Road Standard .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Shoulder Running E40 and Weaving Segments E314
    Arc Atlantique Traffic Management Corridor Annex 1 Evaluation reports www.easyway-its.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FL-01: Hard shoulder running E40 and weaving segments E314 2. FL-02: Hard shoulder running E19 Kleine Bareel – St.-Job-in-‘t-Goor 3. WL-03: Management and transit traffic on Walloon motorways 4. FR-05: Intelligent Truck Parking 5. FR-16: Traffic Management Plans 6. IE-01: MIU ITS Deployment 7. NL-01: Field test Amsterdam 8. PT-..: Monitoring Enhancement on critical segments – to be delivered 9. PT-03: System Enhancements 10. E01: AG-64 Traffic Control and Traffic Management ITS deployment 11. E02: AG-55 Traffic Control and Traffic Management ITS deployment 12. ES-20: Floating Car Data use 13. ES-21: Analysis and evaluation of different traffic management strategies in order to reduce the congestions in Bilbao peri-urban area 14. UK 02: M25 J 5 – 7 Variable Speed Limit, All lane Running / Hard Shoulder Running 15. UK 03: M25 J 23 – 27 Variable Speed Limit, All lane Running / Hard Shoulder Running 16. UK ..: Welsh National Traffic Data System – to be delivered Arc Atlantique Evaluation report – Annex 1 2/2 Hard Shoulder Running and Weaving Segments Belgium –E40/E314 – Brussel - Aken Project Reference: FL-01 Project Name: Hard shoulder running E40 and weaving segments E314 ITS Corridor: E40/E314 Brussel - Aken Project Location: Belgium – E40/E314 Leuven Area 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM ADDRESSED BY THE PROJECT 1.1 Nature of the Site The R0, E40 and E314 in this report are part of a highway connection between the cities of Brussels-Lummen (E314), and Brussels-Luik (E40).
    [Show full text]
  • FREE SPEED STUDY Survey Report 2018
    FREE SPEED STUDY Survey Report 2018 Research Department December 2018 FREE-SPEED SURVEY 2018 Contents Free-Speed Survey – Overview Page 3 o Study Objectives Page 3 o Methodology Page 3 o Key Findings Page 3 Speeding on Urban Roads Page 4 o Historic speeding rates by years, vehicle type and urban Road – Bar Graph Page 4 o Percentage of vehicles on urban roads by road type and degree of violation – Bar Graph Page 5 Speeding on Rural Roads Page 6 o Historic speeding rates of cars on rural roads – Line Graph Page 6 o Percentage of cars speeding on rural roads by road type and degree of violation – Bar Graph Page 7 o Percentage of vehicles speeding on rural roads by road type and degree of violation – Bar Graph Page 8 Percentage of cars speeding on Urban and Rural Roadways – Bar Graph Page 8 Who’s up and who’s down: speeding by cars Page 9 Summary & Recommendations Page 10-11 Appendix 1 Page 12-13 o Detailed Tables – Free-Speed by Road Type 2018 Appendix 2 Page 14-15 o Percentage speeding (Urban) 1999 to 2018 Appendix 3 Page 16-17 o Percentage speeding (Rural) 1999 to 2018 Appendix 4 Page 18 o Breakdown of sites by road type and speed limit,2018 Appendix 5 Page 19 o Survey details o Legal speed limits by vehicle type Page 20 Appendix 6 Page 21 o Top 9 locations – Highest volumes o Lowest 5 locations – Lowest volumes 2 FREE-SPEED SURVEY 2018 Free-Speed Survey - Overview Study Objectives: To determine the incidence of drivers of all vehicle types driving on Irish roads while speeding, and therefore presenting a road safety risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Prepared August 2019
    UNIT 153 SHANNON FREE ZONE, SHANNON, CO. CLARE FOR SALE WWW.UNIT153.COM OPPORTUNITY Excellent opportunity to acquire a highly specified and well maintained facility within an established industrial location. The highly successful estate is home to many large occupiers including Zimmer, Magellan, EMC, GE Sensing, Intel, Irish Aviation Authority, Lufthansa Technik Turbine Shannon, and Symantec. The estate benefits from excellent accessibility to the Airport, Ports and National Road network. The subject facility and estate also benefit from excellent services including ESB, Natural Gas, Water and Fibre allowing for various industrial uses to be catered for. Belfast R468 M18 R472 UNIT 153 N19 L O U T H N5 R471 N17 Shannon N2 N3 N4 Galway N6 Dublin R452 N18 M7 N9 Shannon UNIT 153 N18 M7 R463 N10 Limerick N11 N8 N24 Limerick N20 R455 N21 N25 N20 Rosslare N22 R509 N25 R510 Cork N24 M7 R512 R511 N69 LOCATION Shannon is the second largest town in Co. Clare and occupies a strategic position along the Atlantic corridor and has excellent road connectivity to the Gateway cities of Limerick, Cork and Galway. It is situated in the Southwest region of Ireland and is a major pro-business community and a base for over 200 overseas companies in ICT, life sciences, financial services, engineering, publishing, software, aviation and logistics. The Shannon Free Zone where the subject property is located is of strategic importance and is home to the largest agglomeration of American companies in Ireland outside of Dublin. The Shannon Free Zone (SFZ) is a 243 hectare (600 acres) industrial area with more than 7,000 people working in over 100 companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Limerick Metropolitan District Movement Framework
    Limerick City and County Council Limerick Metropolitan District Movement Framework Study 2 The following people and organisations contributed Mr David Clements to the development of the Movement Framework Organisations/Individuals consulted as part of Study: the development of the study: Limerick City and County Council: Ultan Gogarty – Limerick Institute of Technology Paul Crowe Orlaith Borthwick, Gary Rowan – Limerick Chamber Vincent Murray Miriam Flynn – Bus Éireann Rory McDermott Joe Hoare – University Hospital Limerick Carmel Lynch Insp. Paul Reidy, Sgt. Peter Kelly – An Garda Neal Boyle Síochána John J. Ryan Helen O’Donnell, Philip Danaher – Limerick City Kieran Reeves Business Association Mairead Corrigan Brian Kirby – Mary Immaculate College Robert Reidy, John Moroney – University of Limerick Smarter Travel Office: Limerick Pat O’Neill Michael Curtin – Eurobus Limerick Lise-Ann Sheehan Consultant Members of the Project Team for National Transport Authority: delivery of the Movement Framework Study: Mr Hugh Creegan Tiago Oliveira, Arup Consulting Engineers David O’Keeffe, Arup Consulting Engineers Clifford Killeen, Arup Consulting Engineers Images Photography for this report was provided by Limerick City & County Council and Arup Consulting Engineers. Graphics for this report were provided by Arup Consulting Engineers. 3 Limerick Metropolitan District Movement Framework Study 1 Executive Summary and Introduction 7 1.1 Executive Summary 8 1.2 Introduction - The Limerick Metropolitan District Movement Framework Study 9 2 Literature
    [Show full text]