DOCSLIB.ORG

Design Solutins for Ports of the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DESIGN SOLUTINS FOR PORTS OF THE FUTURE SCIENTIFIC AND PROJECT ENGINEERING COMPANY MorTransNIIProekt ADDRESS BY GENERAL DIRECTOR MorTransNiiProekt is the successor of best traditions and experience of the State Research and Project Design Institute of Merchant Marine «SOYUZMORNIIPROEKT» of the Ministry of Merchant Marine of the USSR for which our Litvinenko Gennady Ivanovich leading specialists worked 2-3 dozen years to have accumulated unique industry experience in science and design General Director of NPK MorTransNIIProekt Co., Doctor of Engineering, Professor, Honored Worker of Merchant Marine Today, our team is a mix of weathered professionals and young talents. Our core staff are the 1999 to 2014 graduates from the Moscow State Civil Engineering University and Moscow State Academy of Water Transport MorTransNiiProekt takes pride in having unique competencies and expertise that enable the company to engage in design and scientific activity, implement complex technical solutions under various natural and climatic conditions in Russia and elsewhere. CONSTRUCTING Our motto: to achieve the highest structural and SEAPORTS? THEN YOU functional perfection of every design NEED A RELIABLE decision Litvinenko PARTNER! Alexander Gennadievich Our experience combined with innovative technologies Director, Project Development ensures high economic efficiency of our design solutions, safety and quality of buildings and structures that we design. We see our mission in expanding the range of our products, permanent quality improvement to make a sizable contribution in the growth of Russia’s economic might We will help you with your projects whatever the size and scope! WE HAVE COMPANY. CAPABILITIES FACTS AND TO OFFER: FIGURES Front-end engineering design (FEED) • Preparing Notices (Declarations) of Intent; • Pre-investment feasibility studies; • Business planning; 9 R&D • Design finance; years old, • Tender documentation. founded in 2011 • Strategic plans for development of port infrastructure facilities; Project development • Methods to determine elements • Design documentation; 56 of the hydrodynamic regime in port water areas; • Urban development documentation; staff members • Loads and impacts on marine • Project specific technical conditions; structures; • DD documentation. 69 • Scientific support of project specific projects developed, of which: technical conditions. Support of projects 38 developed by the Company in the capacity of General Designer • Arrangement of public 31 Engineering survey hearings and discussions; as a Subcontractor • Engineering and hydro-meteorological • Approval of project specific survey; technical conditions; 62 • Ecological survey. • Projects justification before state expert examination bodies FEED contracts Numerical modeling • Preparing a package of documents to obtain permits for creation of artificial • Elements of hydrodynamic, land plots; 27 hydcrochemical, lithodynamic and thermal R&D contracts regimes; • Preparing a package of documents to obtain permits for design and • Protection of port water areas construction; against rough seas, delays due to weather • Preparation and presentation 21 and sea conditions; of proposals for amending compulsory port projects fully constructed • Vessels maneuvering within the port water area; regulations. • Spreading of pollutants in the air and port water area. Construction • Field supervision; Laboratory simulation • Developing marine structures • Wave loads and impacts datasheets; on mariner structures. • Developing checkpoints datasheets 18 GEOGRAPHIC 17 FOOTPRINT 2 16 15 1 RUSSIAРОССИЯ 14 3 13 12 8 5 6 7 ТУРЦИЯTURKEY 11 4 BANGLADESHБАНГЛАДЕШ 1 The White Sea: Port of Arkhangelsk 10 INDIAИНДИЯ 2 The Barents Sea: Liinahamari Terminal; Teriberk terminal 3 The Baltic Sea: Port of Kaliningrad; 9 Port of Ust-Luga; Port of Vysotsk The Azov Sea 6 10 The Ganga Delta 14 The Bering Sea Port of Taganrog; Beringovsky Port; Port of Yeisk; The Rooppur NPP (Bangladesh). Arinay Lagoon Terminal Port of Primorsk- Transshipment of containers with nuclear fuel 4 The Mediterranean Sea Akhtarsk; Port of Temryuk. The Akkuyu NPP (Turkey) 11 The Japan Sea 15 The Gulf of Anadyr .Vostochny Port; Port of Anadyr; 5 The Black Sea: Port of Nakhodka; Port of Novorossiysk; Port of Posyet; 16 The Chukchi Sea Port of Sochi; The Caspian Sea Port Vera. Port of Taman; Port of Makhachkala Port of Pevek; Port of Kavkaz; Hydraulic engineering structures for the floating nuclear Port of Tuapse; The Tatar Strait heat and power plant (Pevek). Port of Gelendzhik. 8 The Volga Delta Port of Shakhtersk; 17 The Kara Sea Uglegorsk Port. Port of Astrakhan; Port Dixon; Port of Olya. Port of Sabetta. 9 The Gulf of Mannar 13 The Bay of Vanino 18 The Pechora Sea Port of Vanino The protective ructures of the water Port of Varandei intake of the Kudankulam NPP (Republic of India) м ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES DEPARTMENT, numerical modeling and field DEPARTMENT, engineering surveys simulation of the hydrophysical processes Engineering geodetic, engineering geological and engineering Numerical modeling:: ecological surveys. Kochev Kabatchenko David Zakharovich Ilya Mikhailovich Field supervision and works progress monitoring; Advisory Ph.D, Geology and Minerology and consulting, internal due diligence of the survey. Head of department. Dr. Sci. in Geography, Professor ТA typical wind field over the Black Sea area Engineering and hydro-meteorological surveys: a full range of field works Basic instrumentation: Efficiency of the coal yard windbreaks Physical simulation Numerical modeling of the wind-driven waves Physical simulation of wave - the Russian atmospheric wave model loads on hydraulic engineering structures (wave records UltraLab «ULSHF54/58»; speed sensing device Vectrino): Key meteorological characteristics: Self- Wave heights and period contained regulator VANTAGE Pro2 Hydrological recorder GMU-2 Wave heights within Wave heights in the port water area a tropical cyclone Numerical modeling of the current speeds and lithodynamic characteristics Piled structures Level fluctuations: Levelogger Bottom sampling: Sea water sampling: Bottom sampler Patalas grab sampler Flow field Distribution of the seabed deformations Bank protection by hexabits ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT, general layouts process engineering Projects development: Development of general layouts: Passenger and cargo and passenger terminals; Shishkin Passenger and cargo and Musikhina Multipurpose (cross functional) terminals for passenger terminals; handling general (container terminals including), Vladimir Vasilievich Elena Alexandrovna Head of department Multipurpose (cross functional) Head of department dry bulk and timber cargoes. terminals for handling general (container terminals including), dry bulk and timber cargoes; Specialized terminals: Specialized terminals; Dry bulk cargoes (coal, ore, fertilizers, raw sugar, NPP water intakes. Area planning and demarcation. grain, mineral building cargoes, etc.); Liquid bulk cargoes (oil and oil products; liquid bulk chemicals; liquefied gases, food liquid cargoes); Cargoes carried by Ro-Ro vessels and sea ferries; perishables; Heavy and oversized cargoes; Cargoes carried by cargo lighters; Hazardous cargoes. The Akkuyu NPP (Turkey). Hydraulic structures layout Sea Port of Gelendzhik. Onshore and offshore infrastructure facilities Port of Vanino (Cape Burny). Coal loading on 160,000 dwt vessels, process diagram Astrakhan. LUKOIL-Nizhnevolskneft The Rooppur NPP (Bangladesh). assembly platform. Float-over of the Transshipment of containers with floating rig superstructure nuclear fuel Sea Port of Makhachkala. General development plan Sea Port of Vera General development plan ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES DEPARTMENT, hydraulic structures DEPARTMENT, onshore buildings and structures Design of hydraulic structures: Development and justification of the spatial and architectural solutions to onshore port infrastructure facilities; Development of technical requirements and resources Design of hydraulic structures of the sea shelve; estimates for the Section “Architectural Solutions”. Design of marine and inland waterway structures; Litvinenko Okusok Design of hydraulic structures for the water Sergei Alexandrovich supply systems of the thermal and nuclear power Ivan Gennadievich Head of department plants. Head of department DEPARTMENT, utility mains Development of technical requirements and resources estimates for the subsections: “Power Supply System”; “Water Supply System”;Development of technical requirements and resources estimates for the subsections: “Power Supply System”; “Water Supply System”; “Sewerage System”; “Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, Heating Networks”; “Communication Networks”; “Gas Supply System”. Gromykin Alexander Petrovich Head of department South and North quays at the Sea Port of Gelendzhik DEPARTMENT, construction planning Development of work schedules, techniques and deadlines; Justification of cost estimates for temporary buildings and structures; Work planning. The protective structures of the water intake of the Kudankulam NPP (Republic of India) Loginov The berth reconstruction at the Port of Kholmsk Andrei Yurievich Head of department ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES Bureau of Chief Project Engineers DEPARTMENT, economics and pricing Pricing of design and construction of capital construction facilities; Gavlin Matveev Review of cost estimates of the subcontractors; Dudnikova Gennady Oleg Elena Mikhailovna Borisovich Arkadievich Preparing construction cost estimates
Recommended publications
  • Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies

    Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies

    Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies No: | 20 5 December 20 Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies Year 3, Issue 5 December 2020 e-ISSN: 2667-470X editors Editor in Chief and Owner Mehmet HACISALİHOĞLU, Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University, Director of Center for Balkan and Black Sea Studies (BALKAR) Special Issue Editors Lyubomir POZHARLIEV, Dr. phil., Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde, Leipzig Florian RIEDLER, Dr. phil., University of Leipzig Stefan ROHDEWALD, Prof. Dr., University of Leipzig Managing/Section Editors Former Yugoslavia: Responsible Director: Hakan DEMİR, PhD., Sakarya University Jahja MUHASILOVIĆ, PhD. International University of Sarajevo Greece, Cyprus: Deniz ERTUĞ, PhD., Istanbul Albania, Kosovo: Fatih Fuat TUNCER, Assist. Prof. Dr., Istanbul Gelişim University Caucasus, Russia: Keisuke WAKIZAKA, Assist. Prof. Dr., Istanbul Gelişim University Bulgaria, Romania: Cengiz YOLCU, PhD cand., Istanbul 29 Mayıs University Secretary Ersin YILMAZ, Zeyneb GÖKÇE (YTU BALKAR Assistants) Editorial Board Chair: Mehmet HACISALİHOĞLU, Prof. Dr., Fuat AKSU, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Isa BLUMI, Prof. Dr., American University of Sharjah Cengiz ÇAĞLA, Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Ali ÇAKSU, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Bilgin ÇELİK, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Dokuz Eylül University Neriman ERSOY-HACISALİHOĞLU, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Istanbul University Ayşe KAYAPINAR, Prof. Dr., National Defence University Levent KAYAPINAR, Prof. Dr., Ankara University Elçin MACAR, Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Çiğdem NAS, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Ali Fuat ÖRENÇ, Prof. Dr., Istanbul University Nurcan ÖZGÜR-BAKLACIOĞLU, Prof. Dr., Istanbul University Esra ÖZSÜER, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Istanbul University Laçin İdil ÖZTIĞ, Assoc. Prof. Yıldız Technical University Milena PETKOVA, Assist. Prof. Dr., Kliment Ohridski University, Sofia Cevdet ŞANLI, Assist.
  • Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And

    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And

    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present State and Future Potential By Claes Lykke Ragner FNI Report 13/2000 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Tittel/Title Sider/Pages Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present 124 State and Future Potential Publikasjonstype/Publication Type Nummer/Number FNI Report 13/2000 Forfatter(e)/Author(s) ISBN Claes Lykke Ragner 82-7613-400-9 Program/Programme ISSN 0801-2431 Prosjekt/Project Sammendrag/Abstract The report assesses the Northern Sea Route’s commercial potential and economic importance, both as a transit route between Europe and Asia, and as an export route for oil, gas and other natural resources in the Russian Arctic. First, it conducts a survey of past and present Northern Sea Route (NSR) cargo flows. Then follow discussions of the route’s commercial potential as a transit route, as well as of its economic importance and relevance for each of the Russian Arctic regions. These discussions are summarized by estimates of what types and volumes of NSR cargoes that can realistically be expected in the period 2000-2015. This is then followed by a survey of the status quo of the NSR infrastructure (above all the ice-breakers, ice-class cargo vessels and ports), with estimates of its future capacity. Based on the estimated future NSR cargo potential, future NSR infrastructure requirements are calculated and compared with the estimated capacity in order to identify the main, future infrastructure bottlenecks for NSR operations. The information presented in the report is mainly compiled from data and research results that were published through the International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP) 1993-99, but considerable updates have been made using recent information, statistics and analyses from various sources.
  • Ukrainian and Russian Waterways and the Development of European Transport Corridors

    Ukrainian and Russian Waterways and the Development of European Transport Corridors

    European Transport \ Trasporti Europei n. 30 (2005): 14-36 Ukrainian and Russian waterways and the development of European transport corridors Michael Doubrovsky1∗ 1Odessa National Maritime University, Odessa, Ukraine Abstract Four of the nine international transport corridors pass through the territory of Ukraine: №3, №5, №7, and №9. In recent years Ukraine conducted an active policy supporting the European initiatives on the international transport corridors and offered variants of corridors to the European community. In the field of a water transport it is planned to carry out the construction of new and reconstruction of existing infrastructure (regarding corridors № 9; TRACECA; Baltic - Black Sea) in the main Ukrainian ports. The paper considers the situation in the Ukrainian waterways as a part of the international transport corridors. It presents an analysis of the existing situation and some planning measures. In order to optimize and rationally development the inland waterways and seaports of the Black Sea – Azov Sea region it is necessary to speed up the working out and official approval of the regional transport ways network. Regarding Ukrainian seaports this task is carried out within the framework of program TRACECA, and also by Steering Committee of Black Sea PETRA and working group on transport of the Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation. To connect the new members countries of EU two approaches are considered: (1) the use of the Danube River due to restoration of navigation in its Ukrainian part, providing an exit to the Black Sea; (2) the creation of new inland water-transport links providing a more rational and uniform distribution of freight traffics from the Central and Northern Europe (using the third largest river in Europe - Dnepr River running into the Black Sea).
  • Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time

    Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time

    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy ISSN: 2146-4553 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2016, 6(4), 782-788. Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time Tatyana I. Pototskaya1*, Alexander P. Katrovskiy2, Vladimir I. Chasovskiy3 1Department of Geography, Natural-Geographical Faculty, Smolensk State University, Smolensk Oblast, Russia, 2Department of Service and Tourism, Smolensk Humanitarian University, Smolensk, Russia, 3Department of Geography, Land Use and Spatial Planning, Institute of Environmental Management, Territorial Development and Urban Construction, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia. *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The article presents the research on transformation of territorial organization of Russian pipeline transport in the post-Soviet time, considering its relations with neighbouring countries. The research identifies general ways of such transformation: The influence of Russia’s desire to escape from the dictate of the transit countries exporting energy; the impact of Russia’s struggle for the transportation of gas and oil extracted in the Caspian Sea basin; the influence of the struggle for the transportation of oil and gas in the Asia-Pacific region. A new database including the main pipelines and sea ports in Russia, revealed correlations in the development of pipeline transport in the post-Soviet period with the development of infrastructure of the country’s sea transport. The article identifies positive changes in the transport infrastructure (construction of Russian alternative pipeline projects), which will reduce the degree of Russian dependence on relations with neighbouring countries, as well as negative changes (construction of alternative Russian pipeline projects).
  • 11771987 01.Pdf

    11771987 01.Pdf

    EXCHANGE RATE 1 Euro = 1.238 US dollar = 3.44 Lytas = 130 Yen (as of end of January 2004) PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter referred to as “GOL”), the Government of Japan decided to conduct a Study on the Port Development Project in the Republic of Lithuania and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a study team to Lithuania three times between March 2003 and June 2004, which was headed by Mr. Kiyokuni Okubo of Nippon Koei Co. Ltd. (NK). The team held discussion with the officials concerned of the GOL and conducted the field surveys at the study area. Upon returning to Japan, the team conducted studies and prepared this report. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of the project and to the enhancement of the friendly relationship between our two countries. Finally, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of GOL for their close cooperation extended to the team. September 2004 Kazuhisa Matsuoka Vice President Japan International Cooperation Agency LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL September 2004 Mr. Kazuhisa Matsuoka Vice President Japan International Cooperation Agency Dear Mr. Matsuoka It is my great pleasure to submit herewith the Final Report of “The Study on the Port Development Project in the Republic of Lithuania”. The study team comprised of Nippon Koei Co. Ltd. (NK) conducted surveys in the Republic of Lithuania over the period between March 2003 and June 2004 according to the contract with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).
  • Crimea: Anatomy of a Decision

    Crimea: Anatomy of a Decision

    Crimea: Anatomy of a decision Daniel Treisman President Vladimir Putin’s decision to seize the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine and incorporate it into Russia was the most consequential of his first 15 years in power.1 It had profound implications for both foreign and domestic policy as well as for how Russia was viewed around the world. The intervention also took most observers—both in Russia and in the West—by surprise. For these reasons, it is a promising case from which to seek insight into the concerns and processes that drive Kremlin decision-making on high-stakes issues. One can distinguish two key questions: why Putin chose to do what he did, and how the decision was made. In fact, as will become clear, the answer to the second question helps one choose among different possible answers to the first. Why did Putin order his military intelligence commandos to take control of the peninsula? In the immediate aftermath, four explanations dominated discussion in the Western media and academic circles. A first image—call this “Putin the defender”—saw the Russian intervention as a desperate response to the perceived threat of NATO enlargement. Fearing that with President Viktor Yanukovych gone Ukraine’s new government would quickly join the Western military alliance, so the argument goes, Putin struck preemptively to prevent such a major strategic loss and to break the momentum of NATO’s eastward drive (see, e.g., Mearsheimer 2014). 1 This chapter draws heavily on “Why Putin Took Crimea,” Foreign Affairs, May/June, 2016. A second image—“Putin the imperialist”—cast Crimea as the climax of a gradually unfolding, systematic project on the part of the Kremlin to recapture the lost lands of the Soviet Union.
  • Black Sea Container Market and Georgia's Positioning

    Black Sea Container Market and Georgia's Positioning

    European Scientific Journal November 2018 edition Vol.14, No.31 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 Black Sea Container Market and Georgia’s Positioning Irakli Danelia, (PhD student) Tbilisi State University, Georgia Doi:10.19044/esj.2018.v14n31p100 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n31p100 Abstract Due to the strategically important geographical location, Black Sea region has a key transit function throughout between Europe and Asia. Georgia, which is a part of Black sea area, has a vital transit function for Caucasus Region, as well as for whole New Silk Road area. Nevertheless, still there is no evidence what kind of role and place Georgia has in The Black Sea container market. As the country has ambition to be transit hub for containerizes cargo flows between west and east and is actively involved in the process of formation “One Belt One Road” project, it is very important to identify Country’s current circumstances, capacities and future potential. Because of this, the purpose of the study is to investigate cargo flows and opportunities of the Black Sea container market, level of competitiveness in the area and define Georgia’s positioning in the regional Container market. Keywords: Geostrategic Location, New Silk Road, Transit Corridor, Cargo flow, Container market, Georgia, Black Sea Methodology Based on practical and theoretical significance of the research the following paper provides systemic, historical and logical generalization methods of research in the performance of the work, scientific abstraction, analysis and synthesis methods are also used. Introduction Since the end of the Cold War, the Black Sea region has no longer been a static border between the West and the East.
  • Caucasian Review of International Affairs (CRIA) Is a Quarterly Peer-Reviewed Free, Non-Profit and Only-Online Academic Journal Based in Germany

    Caucasian Review of International Affairs (CRIA) Is a Quarterly Peer-Reviewed Free, Non-Profit and Only-Online Academic Journal Based in Germany

    CCCAUCASIAN REVIEW OF IIINTERNATIONAL AAAFFAIRS Vol. 4 (((2(222)))) spring 2020201020 101010 RUSSIAN ENERGY POLITICS AND THE EU: HOW TO CHANGE THE PARADIGM VLADIMER PAPAVA & MICHAEL TOKMAZISHVILI AUTHORITARIANISM AND FOREIGN POLICY : THE TWIN PILLARS OF RESURGENT RUSSIA LUKE CHAMBERS THE GEORGIA CRISIS : A NEW COLD WAR ON THE HORIZON ? HOUMAN A. SADRI & NATHAN L. BURNS ENFORCEABILITY OF A COMMON ENERGY SUPPLY SECURITY POLICY IN THE EU EDA KUSKU “A SSEMBLING ” A CIVIC NATION IN KAZAKHSTAN : THE NATION -BUILDING ROLE OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE PEOPLES OF KAZAKHSTAN NATHAN PAUL JONES NEW GEOPOLITICS OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS FAREED SHAFEE CLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN OF LANGUAGES : LANGUAGE LEARNING IN GEORGIA HANS GUTBROD AND MALTE VIEFHUES , CRRC “DRAMATIC CHANGES IN THE POLITICAL ORDER ARE TYPICALLY NOT THE PROVINCE OF DEMOCRACIES ” INTERVIEW WITH DR. JULIE A. GEORGE , CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK ISSN: 1865-6773 www.cria -online.org EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Nasimi Aghayev EDITORIAL BOARD: Dr. Tracey German (King’s College Dr. Robin van der Hout (Europa-Institute, London, United Kingdom) University of Saarland, Germany) Dr. Andrew Liaropoulos (Institute for Dr. Jason Strakes (Analyst, Research European and American Studies, Greece) Reachback Center East, USA) Dr. Martin Malek (National Defence Dr. Cory Welt (Georgetown University, Academy, Austria) USA) INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD: Prof. Hüseyin Bagci , Middle East Prof. Werner Münch , former Prime Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Minister of Saxony-Anhalt, former Member of the European Parliament, Germany Prof. Hans-Georg Heinrich, University of Vienna, Austria Prof. Elkhan Nuriyev , Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies under the Prof. Edmund Herzig , Oxford University, President of the Republic of Azerbaijan UK Dr.
  • For Classification and Construction of Ships (Rccs)

    For Classification and Construction of Ships (Rccs)

    RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SHIPS (RCCS) Part 0 CLASSIFICATION 4 RCCS. Part 0 “Classification” 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 The present Part of the Rules for the materials for the ships except for small craft Classification and Construction of Inland and used for non-for-profit purposes. The re- Combined (River-Sea) Navigation Ships (here quirements of the present Rules are applicable and in all other Parts — Rules) defines the to passenger ships, tankers, pushboats, tug- basic terms and definitions applicable for all boats, ice breakers and industrial ships of Parts of the Rules, general procedure of ship‘s overall length less than 20 m. class adjudication and composing of class The requirements of the present Rules are formula, as well as contains information on not applicable to small craft, pleasure ships, the documents issued by Russian River Regis- sports sailing ships, military and border- ter (hereinafter — River Register) and on the security ships, ships with nuclear power units, areas and seasons of operation of the ships floating drill rigs and other floating facilities. with the River Register class. However, the River Register develops and 1.2 When performing its classification and issues corresponding regulations and other survey activities the River Register is governed standards being part of the Rules for particu- by the requirements of applicable interna- lar types of ships (small craft used for com- tional agreements of Russian Federation, mercial purposes, pleasure and sports sailing Regulations on Classification and Survey of ships, ekranoplans etc.) and other floating Ships, as well as the Rules specified in Clause facilities (pontoon bridges etc.).
  • 2010 Peer Review Report by Hartikainen Frontiers Trabzon

    2010 Peer Review Report by Hartikainen Frontiers Trabzon

    1 Central level (EUSG, MoI, Coast Guard), Trabzon Airport and Seaport, eastern border with Georgia, western borders with Bulgaria and Greece – Expert Col (BG) Antti Hartikainen / Border Guard of Finland PEER REVIEW MISSION TO TURKEY (JHA IND/EXP 42920) 6 – 10 DEC 2010 1. Introduction At the central level, all the three border management experts assigned for the mission (Mr. Hartikainen, Mr. Karohl and Mr. Gaya van Stijn) with all the accompanied personnel from the EU Commission and the EU Delegation to Turkey had a common programme in Ankara. At the beginning, a preparatory meeting was organised with the EU Secretariat General. Subsequently, a meeting took place with the Ministry of the Interior Integrated Border Management (IBM) Bureau. Representatives of the General Directorate of Security (Turkish National Police, Department of Aliens, Borders and Asylum Affairs), General Staff, Land Forces Command, Gendarmerie General Command, Coast Guard Command, and Turkish Customs Enforcement also were present in both of the aforementioned meetings. At the end of the central level programme, a visit was made to the Coast Guard Command. During the field visit, the expert was familiarised with the Trabzon airport and seaport on the shore of the Black Sea, Sarp Border Crossing Point (BCP) on the border with Georgia, Kapıkule BCP on the border with Bulgaria, Pazarkule BCP on the border with Greece and Edirne Removal Centre located to the close proximity to the last two aforementioned BCPs. Moreover, two Deputy Governors joined the trip in their respective Areas of Responsibility on the eastern and western borders and a meeting was held with the Governor in Edirne and the Deputy Governor in Trabzon.
  • “A Trend Setter for the Cruise Industry”

    “A Trend Setter for the Cruise Industry”

    Summer 2007 Cruise, port and destination Digest Fain: Going Dingle: Europe Olesen: The where we are in a global impact of air wanted industry polution 27 & 29 22 33 Who said What? Seatrade Miami, Cruise Europe, MedCruise and Cruise3sixty Q Fain Q Dickinson Q Veitch Q Kruse Q Dingle Q Hanrahan Q Sasso Q Naylor Q Pate Q Lingard Q Mehta Q Krumrine Q Douwes Q Cox Q Diez Q Forney Q Oner: Delivering quality shore excursions: 24 Q Featured Destination: South Corsica: 12 Carnival moves quickly as Ratcliffe “A trend setter for announces retirement the cruise industry” arnival Corporation & plc has Cmoved quickly to announce two promotions to come into immediate effect following news of Peter Ratcliffe’s retirement next March. David Dingle has been promoted to chief executive offi cer, Carnival UK with responsibility for the company’s British brands – P&O Cruises, Ocean Village and Cunard Line. He is also appointed chairman of the Carnival plc Management Committee with responsibility for P&O Cruises n innovative new ship design three decks, right in the middle of Australia. Alan Buckelew has been Adeserves a spectacular send off the ship. Whereas conventional ship promoted to president and chief and the christening ceremony for design requires the strongest steels executive offi cer of Princess Cruises. AIDADiva, in Hamburg, did not to be placed in this section to provide Further management changes at disappoint. added strength to its structure, this Carnival UK are detailed on page 1. A crowd of up to half a million open space acts as a meeting place citizens from this ship crazy city during the day and a theatre and lined the banks of the Elbe to witness nightclub in the evening.
  • Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies

    Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies

    Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for development of transport corridors for further studies September 2013 Front page photos: Kjetil Iversen, Rune N. Larsen and Sindre Skrede/NRK Table of Contents Table Summary 7 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Objectives and members of the Expert Group 13 1.3 Mandate and tasks 14 1.4 Scope 14 1.5 Methodology 2 Transport objectives 15 2.1 National objectives 15 2.2 Expert Group’s objective 16 3 Key studies, work and projects of strategic importance 17 3.1 Multilateral agreements and forums for cooperation 17 3.2 Multilateral projects 18 3.4 National plans and studies 21 4 Barents Region – demography, climate and main industries 23 4.1 Area and population 23 4.2 Climate and environment 24 4.3 Overview of resources and key industries 25 4.4 Ores and minerals 25 4.5 Metal industry 27 4.6 Seafood industry 28 4.7 Forest industry 30 4.8 Petroleum industry 32 4.9 Tourism industry 35 4.10 Overall transport flows 37 4.11 Transport hubs 38 5 Main border-crossing corridors in the Barents Region 40 5.1 Corridor: “The Bothnian Corridor”: Oulu – Haparanda/Tornio - Umeå 44 5.2 Corridor: Luleå – Narvik 49 5.3 Corridor: Vorkuta – Syktyvkar – Kotlas – Arkhangelsk - Vartius – Oulu 54 5.4 Corridor: “The Northern Maritime Corridor”: Arkhangelsk – Murmansk – The European Cont. 57 5.5 Corridor: “The Motorway of the Baltic Sea”: Luleå/Kemi/Oulu – The European Continent 65 5.6 Corridor: Petrozavodsk – Murmansk – Kirkenes 68 5.7 Corridor: Kemi – Salla – Kandalaksha 72 5.8 Corridor: Kemi – Rovaniemi – Kirkenes 76