DOCSLIB.ORG

Aldersley High School 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aldersley High School 1 Amethyst Trust: Directors Meeting Date of Meeting: Thursday 4th July 2019 Venue: Aldersley High School 1. Present Apologies Others in attendance Jim Inglis (Chair) Helen Bourton Laura Armato Bob Stephenson (Vice chair) Christine Thomas Lauren Jones (Clerk) Nicola Davis Nicola Bayliss Robert Grant Sue Reid Mick Marks 2. Declarations of interest Directors were advised that if a person has any interest in a contract, proposed contract or matter under consideration, s/he should disclose this fact and take no part in the consideration, discussion or vote in respect of the contract or matter and withdraw from the meeting. Directors were also reminded that care should be taken to ensure that they were aware of the agenda items of a confidential nature. In addition, they were advised to ensure that minutes of their meeting did not include information of a confidential nature as, once approved, they become public documents. 3. Minutes of previous meeting and matters arising. RESOLVED: That the minutes of the previous meeting, held on 22nd March 2018 shall be approved and signed as a correct record. Ref Item Discussion 4 Finance Update – presented by Laura Armato. 4.1 The trust board welcome Robert grant to the meeting as a new amethyst director. In a change to the agenda Laura Armato presented the financial report to the trust board. Laura explained that she had made assumptions for 3 years. The budget forecast return has been prepared based on the latest information available to the Amethyst Academies Trust. Inflation and payroll has been assumed at 2% from September for teachers and from April for other staff. Cost inflation has been assumed at 2% with additional costs included for energy. 4.2 Laura discussed current funding for the teachers’ pay Grant. She noted that funding beyond March 2020 has not been confirmed and therefore has not been included in future predictions. Laura explained that the employer contribution rate of the teacher's pension scheme (TPS) will increase from 16.48 % to 23.68% from September 2019. This is a 7.2% increase which naturally would drive schools into deficit positions without support from the government. 4.3 Academies will receive £114.08 per pupil funding rate for the academic year 2019/20, the Grant has been factored into both school plans at £134288 for Moreton school and £170660 at Aldersley High School. 1 4.4 Laura expressed satisfaction, in that pupil numbers are rising rapidly in both schools, and the trust is therefore likely to attract growth fund as a result of this, payable by the local authority. 4.5 In the long-term those funds need to sit a trust level, so that centralised services including marketing ICT and network manager positions are all paid from the centralised pot. This is known as top-slicing. Laura explain that post-16 funding moving forward will now sit within the Aldersley budget, as the Sixth Form Centre will be based on the Aldersley High School site. 4.6 The trust board stated that the trust appears to be in a strong financial position and given the current political landscape with many schools falling into deficit positions Mr Stephenson asked what the trust will be doing differently in order to secure and continue with its strong financial position? 4.7 Laura explain that the trust has been quick to cost out over-staffed departments and take a strategic approach to combat growing staffing costs. Trusts who have not done so are likely to have fallen into deficit positions and once a deficit is reached the effect can be cumulative year on a year. 4.8 There is a strong model of financial accountability within the trust governance system. Laura explained that the finance and general purposes committee that sits on a monthly basis ensures that monthly accounts are heavily scrutinised, and associated spending is in line with budgetary constraints. The board commended the work of Laura and her team, in light of evidence of clear strength in the reserve position at 0.69% approximately. Mr Mark asked at what a benchmark percentage would be, as recommended by the ESFA? Laura replied that the ESFA would be happy to see reserves at around 1% of the trust’s gross income. 4.9 Laura explains that she wouldn't want to report on large in year surplus’s as this may attract questions as to why money wasn't being spent on teaching and curriculum resources. Lara went on to explain that a balancing exercise was needed to be in constant review in order to demonstrate a healthy reserved for unseen and unaccounted costs (should they occur) whilst also using public funded money for the purpose in which it was acquired as per our funding agreement. Directors thanked Laura for her contribution. Laura left the meeting at 5:30 p.m. 5 School Report- Preparations for OFSTED Nicola Davies notes that next on the agenda is the school report for Moreton school with preparations for Ofsted inspection. It was agreed that as Nicola Bayliss had sent her apologies for this meeting this item would be deferred until the next meeting in October 2019. 6 Amethyst Academies Trust – Free School Proposal – Presented by Nicola Davis. Nicola Davies presented to the board plans to open a new free school in the Wolverhampton area. She stated that following her presentation it would be a matter for the Trust Board to consider whether they then felt there was a need in Wolverhampton for a new free school and whether they then considered it was a viable option for the Amethyst Academies Trust to continue to explore the option of a free school application at this present time. 6.1 Nicola Davis proposed that the free school would be opened in the centre of Wolverhampton City and would be called the Amethyst Central Academy (ACA). Nicola explained that the proposal for the ACA would be a coeducational non-denominational 8 form entry with a pan of 210. 2 6.2 Nicola Davis explains that Wolverhampton City Council have conducted an exercise which shows demonstratable need for a new school in the area. Their research has concluded that pupil numbers from nursery years through to 2023 and beyond are growing by 23%. Furthermore, there are growth plans within the city of Wolverhampton to invest money in regeneration in order to increase economic stability within the city. This is resulting in a further 8 large housing developments being built across the City. Nicola presented surplus data to the board. 6.3 This surplus data was based on the assumption that they UTC would increase its pan to 150 students taking them from Year 7 onwards. At present the UTC only offers Key Stage 4 education. Nicola notes that it is the Department of Education’s recommendation that each cohort carry a 2% surplus for new arrivals and migration of students in and out of the city; the data clearly notes and deficit of places from 2022 onwards. 6.4 Nicola presents that as well as a demonstratable basic need for a new school within the city, there is also a need to rise the academic profile of the city based on existing schools within a short radius of the newly proposed school. Nicola explained to the board that the thread throughout the free school application is based on the progress that can be made to disadvantaged students. The board are presented with headline data that shows progress 8 scores against others in the city. Jim Inglis asks if the UTC cohort numbers have now been agreed? Nicola confirm they have not yet been agreed 6.5 Nicola presented to the board that the proposed new site for the Amethyst Central Academy would be St George's parade in the city centre. This is known as the Old Sainsbury's site. Nicola explain the benefits of a city centre site would be that, having observed a map of schools in the Wolverhampton area- most schools currently situated around the perimeter of the city. This has a detrimental effect to most students who have to take two buses to get to their chosen School. Research has shown that students have to take one bus into the city to then catch a second bus back out to the perimeter schools. A Centrally placed Academy would mean that travel was easier for students and with a working college and university very close to the proposed free school this would make the strong working relationships with establishments and shared facilities. 6.6 Nicola explains to the board that the application is for an 11 through to 16 provision at present; there are no funding routes available for post-16 funding. Robert Grant asked what associated risks would need to be considered in opening city centre School. Nicola Davies explained that city centre associated risk had been given due consideration (example higher crime rates) however she was confident that the regeneration plan put forward by Wolverhampton City Council would have taken into her account some of the risks that could be identified with the location of the proposed School. Nicola feels that at the risk is greatly outweighed by the facilities /relationships that can be utilised in having a city centre school. 6.7 Nicola explained that the trust had applied for support via the new school network with the Trust’s free school application. Support from NSN has been successful obtained and the trust is therefore in the process of writing the wave 14 application which is then submitted to NSN in parts for scrutiny by their Free School experts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Place for Every Child
    A Place for Every Child The Vision for School Organisation in the City of Wolverhampton 2018-20 wolverhampton.gov.uk City of Wolverhampton Education Place Planning 2 City of Wolverhampton Council wolverhampton.gov.uk Contents CONTENTS 4 Chapter 1 34 Chapter 8 Executive summary Early Years Provision 18 Chapter 2 36 Chapter 9 Primary School Infant and Junior School Organisation Provision 20 Chapter 3 37 Chapter 10 Secondary School Post-16 Provision Organisation 22 Chapter 4 39 Chapter 11 The Introduction of Alternative Provision Additional School Places 27 Chapter 5 40 Chapter 12 Removal of Estate Management Maintained Provision/ Discontinuance of 41 Chapter 13 Maintained Provision Strategy Review 30 Chapter 6 42 Chapter 14 All-through Schools Resources 31 Chapter 7 43 Appendices Specialist Provision wolverhampton.gov.uk A Place for Every Child 3 Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary The main challenge that the City of Wolverhampton faces in relation to the organisation of school provision, is ensuring that sufficient high- quality school places are available to meet the needs of local communities across the City. Driven by a 24% increase in births between 2002 and 2016, levels of demand for school provision have increased significantly in recent years. In excess of 3,000 additional places have been commissioned since 2012 in primary schools and since 2017 in secondary schools, to cater for the demographic uplift. The recently witnessed increase in demand for primary provision in the City, has already started to impact on the City’s secondary estate and significant additional capacity will be required to cater for future cohorts.
    [Show full text]
  • Connected Networks
    ConnectEd Networks A unique Wolverhampton based partnership of over 100 local schools CN One CN Four CN Six and Seven Eastfield Nursery School Bantock Primary School Aldersley High School Eastfield Primary School Castlecroft Primary School Berrybrook Primary School Green Park Special School Highfields School Bushbury Nursery School Holy Rosary Catholic Primary Academy Merridale Primary School Bushbury Hill Primary School Moseley Park School Nishkam Primary School Dovecotes Primary School St Matthias School Penn Hall Special School Elston Hall Primary School Stow Heath Primary School Pennfields Special School Fallings Park Primary School Stow Lawn Primary School Smestow School Low Hill Nursery School Villiers Primary School Springdale Primary School Moreton Community School St Michael’s Catholic Primary Academy Ormiston NEW Academy CN Two Uplands Junior School Northwood Park Primary School Bilston Church of England Primary School Warstones Primary School Our Lady and St Chad Catholic Academy Bilston Nursery School Westacre Infant School Palmers Cross Primary School Field View Primary School Rakegate Primary School Holy Trinity Catholic Primary School St Mary’s Catholic Primary Academy Loxdale Primary School Westcroft School Ormiston SWB Academy Whitgreave Primary School St Martin’s Primary School Wilkinson Primary School CN Three CN Eight CN Five Colton Hills School Ashmore Park Nursery School Broadmeadow Special Nursery School Goldthorn Park Primary School Coppice Performing Arts School Christ Church Infant School Graiseley Primary School
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Schools
    List of West Midlands Schools This document outlines the academic and social criteria you need to meet depending on your current secondary school in order to be eligible to apply. For APP City/Employer Insights: If your school has ‘FSM’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling. If your school has ‘FSM or FG’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling or be among the first generation in your family to attend university. For APP Reach: Applicants need to have achieved at least 5 9-5 (A*-C) GCSES and be eligible for free school meals OR first generation to university (regardless of school attended) Exceptions for the academic and social criteria can be made on a case-by-case basis for children in care or those with extenuating circumstances. Please refer to socialmobility.org.uk/criteria-programmes for more details. If your school is not on the list below, or you believe it has been wrongly categorised, or you have any other questions please contact the Social Mobility Foundation via telephone on 0207 183 1189 between 9am – 5:30pm Monday to Friday. School or College Name Local Authority Academic Criteria Social Criteria Abbot Beyne School Staffordshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Alcester Academy Warwickshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Alcester Grammar School Warwickshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Aldersley High School Wolverhampton 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Aldridge
    [Show full text]
  • Barnhurst Lane Pitches Adjacent Aldersley School Barnhurst Lane Pendeford
    Gareth Dwight: Planning Assistant – Planning Committee 20/02/2018 17/00669/FUL Mrs Rebecca Duggan Councillor Val Chapman Councillor Paul Fieldhouse BILBROOK Barnhurst Lane Pitches Adjacent Aldersley School Barnhurst Lane Pendeford Ancillary changing facilities to support existing FA standard sports pitches 1. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING HISTORY 1.1 Site Description 1.1.1 The application relates to a 10 hectare multi-pitch grass playing field which was granted consent in 2013, comprising 5 senior soccer pitches, 1 junior soccer pitch and 1 mini-soccer pitch (12/00863/FUL). 1.1.2 The site is situated off Barnhurst Lane in Bilbrook on the District boundary with Wolverhampton, within the West Midlands Green Belt. 1.1.3 There is residential development to the east, Aldersely High School to the south, and open grassland/woodland further to the west and north. 1.1.4 Approximately 60% of the sports pitches fall within the borough of South Staffordshire District Council, with the remaining 40% within Wolverhampton City Council. 1.1.5 The application site itself concerns the south-eastern corner of the playing fields, near the site entrance off Barnhurst Lane. The site falls wholly within the South Staffordshire District boundary. 1.2 Planning History 2015: Site entrance sign and site sponsorship sign, Advertisement Consent granted, 15/00400/ADV 2014: Removal of condition no1 of permission 12/00301/FUL, Approved, 14/00613/VAR 2013: Variation of condition 3 of permission 12/00863/FUL to amend operational hours, Approved, 13/00459/VAR 2012: New 10-hectare (25-acre) multi-pitch grass playing field plus vehicle parking, fencing and landscaping [major development], Approved, 12/00863/FUL 2012: Creation and provision of new vehicular access and turning area, construction of temporary haul road, transitional material storage area and site hut in association with proposed works to Aldersley High School, Approved, 12/00301/FUL Gareth Dwight: Planning Assistant – Planning Committee 20/02/2018 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversubscribed Or Not- Oversubscribed
    [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED] Response to Request for Information Reference FOI 000890 Date 15 February 2017 Schools in Wolverhampton – Oversubscribed or Not- Oversubscribed Request: Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, please supply the following: 1 A list of all secondary, middle and upper schools in Wolverhampton and whether they were oversubscribed or not-oversubscribed on national offer day 2017 (1st March). Please include each school’s Unique Reference Number (URN), DFE code, or address/postcode to allow us to identify each relevant school without ambiguity. We define a school to be oversubscribed if, and only if, at least one on-time applicant was refused a place and the applicant did not receive an offer from any higher preference school. If there were no refusals to on-time applicants - even if the school was unable to accept one or more late applications, or admitted over its published admission number - then we do not consider this school to be oversubscribed. If you use a different definition of oversubscription, then please make this clear in the response. Aldersley High School – 336/5402 - Not oversubscribed Colton Hills Community School – 336/4133 – Not oversubscribed Coppice Performing Arts School – 336/4128 - Oversubscribed Heath Park – 336/4134 - Oversubscribed Highfields School – 336/4113 – Oversubscribed Moreton Community School – 336/4139 - Not oversubscribed Moseley Park Academy – 336/4000 - Not oversubscribed North East Wolverhampton Academy – 336/6906 - Not oversubscribed Our Lady and St Chad Catholic Sports
    [Show full text]
  • Secondaryschoolspendinganaly
    www.tutor2u.net Analysis of Resources Spend by School Total Spending Per Pupil Learning Learning ICT Learning Resources (not ICT Learning Resources (not School Resources ICT) Total Resources ICT) Total Pupils (FTE) £000 £000 £000 £/pupil £/pupil £/pupil 000 Swanlea School 651 482 1,133 £599.2 £443.9 £1,043.1 1,086 Staunton Community Sports College 234 192 426 £478.3 £393.6 £871.9 489 The Skinners' Company's School for Girls 143 324 468 £465.0 £1,053.5 £1,518.6 308 The Charter School 482 462 944 £444.6 £425.6 £870.2 1,085 PEMBEC High School 135 341 476 £441.8 £1,117.6 £1,559.4 305 Cumberland School 578 611 1,189 £430.9 £455.1 £885.9 1,342 St John Bosco Arts College 434 230 664 £420.0 £222.2 £642.2 1,034 Deansfield Community School, Specialists In Media Arts 258 430 688 £395.9 £660.4 £1,056.4 651 South Shields Community School 285 253 538 £361.9 £321.7 £683.6 787 Babington Community Technology College 268 290 558 £350.2 £378.9 £729.1 765 Queensbridge School 225 225 450 £344.3 £343.9 £688.2 654 Pent Valley Technology College 452 285 737 £339.2 £214.1 £553.3 1,332 Kemnal Technology College 366 110 477 £330.4 £99.6 £430.0 1,109 The Maplesden Noakes School 337 173 510 £326.5 £167.8 £494.3 1,032 The Folkestone School for Girls 325 309 635 £310.9 £295.4 £606.3 1,047 Abbot Beyne School 260 134 394 £305.9 £157.6 £463.6 851 South Bromsgrove Community High School 403 245 649 £303.8 £184.9 £488.8 1,327 George Green's School 338 757 1,096 £299.7 £670.7 £970.4 1,129 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys 211 309 520 £297.0 £435.7 £732.7 709 Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2022 National Funding Formula Provisional Allocations and Authority Proforma Tool Contact Officer Terry Shaw, Finance Manager
    City of Wolverhampton Council SCHOOLS’ FORUM Date 3 December 2020 Report title 2021-2022 National Funding Formula Provisional Allocations and Authority Proforma Tool Contact Officer Terry Shaw, Finance Manager Email address: [email protected] Summary In July 2020, the Department for Education published the National Funding Formula Provisional Allocations for the Schools Block, the High Needs Block and the Central Schools and Services Block for the 2021-2022 Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG). The purpose of this report is to notify Schools’ Forum Members of the indicative allocations and the process for setting budgets funded by the DSG in 2021-2022. The Early Years Block Provisional Allocation is expected to be published by the Department for Education in late November 2020, and a report will be received by Forum in February detailing the proposed budget for approval. Decision Members of Schools’ Forum are asked to note: The indicative allocations and the process for setting budgets funded by the DSG in 2021-2022. Schedule of Background Papers - Schools’ Forum High Needs Sub-Group Meeting Report 12.11.2020 (Appendix 3) 1.0 Schools Block Allocation 1.1 For the financial year 2021-2022 it will remain the duty of Local Authorities to set a local funding formula, in consultation with their Schools’ forum, to determine the allocation of funding from the School’s Block of the DSG to schools in the City. Central government has recently restated its intention to move to a National Funding formula (NFF) and already uses this formula to determine the funding allocated at an area level.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Building Schools for the Future Announcement of Monday 5 July 2010
    Impact of Building Schools for the Future announcement of Monday 5 July 2010 1. This list sets out the impact on schools of the announcement on Building Schools for the Future (BSF) made by the Secretary of State for Education on Monday 5 July 2010. It has been produced by Partnerships for Schools (PfS) after validation at senior level in Local Authorities and rigorously checked by the Department for Education, including by making telephone contact with every Local Authority listed and with all affected Academy sponsors. 2. This process of checking has been necessary because of the complexity of the BSF process, to ensure the accuracy of this list and, in particular, because, to date, PfS has collected data from Local Authorities about BSF schools as they progressed. Rather than micromanaging individual schools, PfS has relied on Local Authority-level information. 3. All Local Authorities which were participating in BSF are listed, plus those who have had one school pathfinders or academies built or being built through the Partnerships for Schools Academies Framework. That is 102 Local Authorities out of a total of 152. And every school which was included within a Local Authority project is listed and is categorised as either ‘open’, ‘unaffected’, ‘for discussion’ or ‘stopped’. 1592 schools are listed in total. 159 are categorised as ‘open’, 547 as ‘unaffected’, 151 as ‘for discussion’ and 735 as ‘stopped’. 4. For simplicity, and because large numbers of pupils cross constituency boundaries to attend school, this list does not provide a breakdown of schools by constituency. 5. There are many examples of Local Authorities in this list having schools in more than one of these categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Hard to Place Pupils Protocol Key Decision Yes / No in Forward Plan Yes / No
    Agenda Item No: 7(m) Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER) Cabinet / Cabinet Panel CABINET Date 27 JULY 2005 Portfolio(s) CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE Originating Service Group(s) LIFELONG LEARNING - EDUCATION Contact Officer(s) B A KEIL Telephone Number(s) 5925 Title HARD TO PLACE PUPILS PROTOCOL KEY DECISION YES / NO IN FORWARD PLAN YES / NO Recommendation That Members of the Cabinet: (i) note the requirement to have a Hard to Place Pupils Protocol in place by September 2005; (ii) note the consultation which has already taken place; (iii) approve the Protocol for implementation in the LEA from September 2005. Schedule of Background Papers None Hard to Place Pupil Protcol – Draft [July 04 05] 1 HARD TO PLACE PUPIL PROTOCOL (DRAFT) 1.0 Background 1.1 The DfES issued the Circular, Guidance on Hard To Place Pupils (LEA/0316/2004) in November 2004 requiring two areas for action. These were: i) that the local Admissions Forum develop a protocol on the admission of hard to place pupils; ii) that work be undertaken on delegating or devolving funding to groups of schools to enable them to take responsibility for managing difficult pupils and making alternative provision where necessary. 1.2 The first of these elements has been undertaken and the draft Protocol is attached at Appendix 1 for the Cabinet's consideration. 1.3 The second required action is part of a much larger piece of work which is underway and the elements of this are detailed in Appendix 2. 1.4 As the Hard To Place Pupils Protocol is intended to relate to the placement of secondary pupils in the first instance, the deliberations and consultations have been held with secondary colleagues and teacher associations, though when this was presented to the SIP Board and Schools' Forum, primary headteachers expressed an interest in considering this as an option once it had been introduced to the secondary sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Desktop Redirected Printer
    England LEA/Establishment Code School/College Name Town 928/4007 Abbeyfield School Northampton 803/4000 Abbeywood Community School Bristol 931/8007 Abingdon and Witney College Abingdon 894/6906 Abraham Darby Academy Telford 888/6905 Accrington Academy Accrington 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 209/4600 Addey and Stanhope School London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 935/4043 Alde Valley School Leiston 888/4030 Alder Grange Community and Technology School Rossendale 830/4089 Aldercar High School Nottingham 891/4117 Alderman White School Nottingham 336/5402 Aldersley High School Wolverhampton 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 830/4001 Alfreton Grange Arts College Alfreton 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 357/4604 All Saints Catholic College Dukinfield 340/4615 All Saints Catholic High School Knowsley 373/5401 All Saints' Catholic High School Sheffield 879/6905 All Saints Church of England Academy Plymouth 383/4040 Allerton Grange School Leeds 304/5405 Alperton Community School Wembley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College of Arts Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 909/5407 Appleby Grammar School Appleby-in-Westmorland 380/6907 Appleton Academy Bradford 341/4781 Archbishop Blanch School Liverpool 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 306/4600
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol, Late Night Refreshment and Entertainment Premises Register
    Alcohol, Late Night Refreshment and Entertainment Premises Register Alcohol, Late Night Refreshment and Entertainment Premises Register Contacts E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.Wolverhampton.gov.uk/licensing Phone: 01902 556036/37 Last updated: 30/07/2013 Licence number Name of premises Address Type of application Date granted 23015 31 Victoria Street, Town Centre, WV1 3PW Premises Licence Application 02-Dec-08 31712 70 Ettingshall Road, Lanesfield, WV14 9UG Premises Licence Application 28-May-10 37204 398-400 Penn Road, Wolverhampton Duty to notify change of name or address - Premises 18-Mar-09 37800 29 Snow Hill, Town Centre, WV2 4AG Premises Licence Application 17-Jun-11 38591 85-87 Church Street, Bilston, WV14 0BJ Premises Licence Application 03-Aug-11 40159 49 Rooker Avenue, Ettingshall, WV2 2DT Variation of Premises Licence 05-Oct-11 44042 9-10 Johnson Street, Lanesfield, WV14 9RL Premises Licence Application 13-Jul-12 47815 Rear of 61 Crowther Street, Park Village, WV10 9AG Premises Licence Application 29-Mar-13 48247 5 Bridgnorth Road, Compton / Wightwick, WV6 8AB Premises Licence Application 49632 220 Birmingham New Road, Wolverhampton, WV4 6NF Premises Licence Application 3964 44 Club Spring Road, Lanesfield, WV4 6LQ Variation of Club Premises Certificate 06-Sep-05 47487 ABH News Food & Wines Ltd 70 Green Lane, Aldersley, WV6 9HJ Minor Variations 13-Feb-13 45516 Agnes Rowe 16A High Street, Rugby, CV21 3B Duty to notify change of name or address - Premises 08-Jul-05 47444 AIBE Market 165 Dudley Road, Blakenhall,
    [Show full text]