Impact of Building Schools for the Future Announcement of Monday 5 July 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impact of Building Schools for the Future Announcement of Monday 5 July 2010 Impact of Building Schools for the Future announcement of Monday 5 July 2010 1. This list sets out the impact on schools of the announcement on Building Schools for the Future (BSF) made by the Secretary of State for Education on Monday 5 July 2010. It has been produced by Partnerships for Schools (PfS) after validation at senior level in Local Authorities and rigorously checked by the Department for Education, including by making telephone contact with every Local Authority listed and with all affected Academy sponsors. 2. This process of checking has been necessary because of the complexity of the BSF process, to ensure the accuracy of this list and, in particular, because, to date, PfS has collected data from Local Authorities about BSF schools as they progressed. Rather than micromanaging individual schools, PfS has relied on Local Authority-level information. 3. All Local Authorities which were participating in BSF are listed, plus those who have had one school pathfinders or academies built or being built through the Partnerships for Schools Academies Framework. That is 102 Local Authorities out of a total of 152. And every school which was included within a Local Authority project is listed and is categorised as either ‘open’, ‘unaffected’, ‘for discussion’ or ‘stopped’. 1592 schools are listed in total. 159 are categorised as ‘open’, 547 as ‘unaffected’, 151 as ‘for discussion’ and 735 as ‘stopped’. 4. For simplicity, and because large numbers of pupils cross constituency boundaries to attend school, this list does not provide a breakdown of schools by constituency. 5. There are many examples of Local Authorities in this list having schools in more than one of these categories. This is because investment through BSF has typically, in larger Local Authorities, taken place in separate ‘waves’ and many have academy projects at various stages of development. 6. Most Local Authorities procure ‘Local Education Partnerships’ (LEPs), to deliver BSF projects at school level. In summary, the procurement process for establishing a LEP is as follows: Remit This marks the formal entry of a local authority into the BSF programme. The local authority has been assessed to be ready to progress their project and is advised by Partnerships for Schools (PfS) of an indicative allocation of future funding. At this stage the authority will have been actively engaging with its schools community, will have assessed pupil place requirements and will be considering issues such as amalgamation and closure of schools as well as status of schools. 1 Pre- This phase is broken into two stages; the first to develop the procurement educational strategy linked to an investment strategy known as the ‘Strategy for Change’ and the second, more technical, requirement to prepare an Outline Business Case (OBC). An OBC articulates how the estate strategy will be delivered and that the project is sufficiently robust, deliverable and affordable to move into a market competition. Some components of an OBC require HM Treasury (HMT) approval to specific criteria, notably if PFI is involved. An approval of an OBC gives the local authority a firmer indication of the funding envelope and gives permission to start procurement. Notice in the A LEP procurement is governed by EU regulation called Official Competitive Dialogue. A notice in the Official Journal of the Journal of European Union (OJEU) indicates the intention of the local the authority to procure and gives a clear indication to the market European of both scope and timetable, inviting expressions of interest. Union The process is determined by European Law. The first step is (OJEU) to pre-qualify bidders from a long-list of interested parties and then to determine a short-list of three bidding consortia. The consortia comprise a number of companies such as construction, ICT and facilities management providers and possibly funders. Dialogue The three shortlisted bidders are invited to discuss the local authority’s requirements in more detail and to submit formal bids setting out their response, including outline designs. One of the bidders is rejected at this stage and the remaining two bidders are taken through more detailed dialogue which involves detailed design development, negotiation of contractual terms and the funding arrangements. Close of The Close of Dialogue is a formal part of the legal process Dialogue where the authority confirms that the bidders have met their Preferred requirements and invites bidders to submit their final bid with Bidder well developed designs and prices. The bids are evaluated by the authority and a preferred bidder is selected by elected members on the recommendation of officers. Financial This is the point where contracts are signed between the close procuring authority and the private sector partner for the creation of the LEP together with two or more of the first schools to be delivered (known as ‘sample schools’). There are further ‘closes’ at school level during the life of the LEP. Approval is given after evaluation of a final business case and at this point local authorities receive a confirmation of BSF funding. 2 Operational The principle of a LEP procurement is that the contractor is LEP – one awarded the exclusive opportunity to deliver capital wave of investment to schools in the local authority area for 10 years. investment Contractually any investment in schools above a determined level (typically £250k) must be offered to the LEP subject to performance criteria. The first procurement for a ‘wave’ of BSF investment covers, typically around ten schools. Two of those schools are used to test the bidders in competition – one capital funded and one PFI. These are known as ‘sample schools’. The scope of the wave and capital value is part of the invitation to the market and is set out within the contracts signed. The remaining eight schools (known as ‘non-samples’ or the ‘pipeline’) are then delivered by the partnership without further HMT-level approvals. The LEP delivers the eight schools in the ‘pipeline’ through a process determined by the contract. This leads to a financial close on each individual school. At any one time the LEP may have several schools in various stages of development. Operational Some local authorities have a further ‘repeat’ wave of funding LEP – more after the procurement has been concluded, to deliver further than one schools. This does not require a procurement process as the wave of LEP is already in place, with exclusive rights to deliver. investment However, repeat waves do need formal approval from central Government to secure additional funding. National At the pre-procurement stage some BSF projects conclude Academy that the National Academy Framework offers a more Framework appropriate delivery method for their project. The framework was established under European procurement rules and has panel of construction companies which compete for design and build contracts, typically of lower value than the LEP procurements. PFI projects are not delivered through this route. Individual Academy projects are delivered through this procurement method where there is no Local Education Partnership in place or in response to local circumstances. 7. Schools listed as ‘Open’ in this list are those in which the procurement has delivered the planned new building, refurbishment, extension or ICT. For simplicity, ‘open’ is used for all complete projects, even where the project was for ICT only. 8. Schools listed as ‘Unaffected’ in this list are those which are within initial LEP or Academy Framework procurements which have reached ‘Financial Close’; or which for BSF are within a repeat wave of investment 3 which was approved prior to 1 January 2010. 9. Schools listed as ‘Stopped’ in this list are those which are within initial LEP procurements which had not yet reached ‘Financial Close’ (other than the ‘sample’ schools in projects which had passed the ‘Close of Dialogue’ point) or are Academy Framework projects, which had not achieved Financial Close, and where there is no funding agreement in place and the Academy is not open or about to open; or which were to have been in a repeat wave of investment, but which had not received approval prior to 1 January 2010. 10. Schools listed as ‘For Discussion’ in this list are either: a. those which were to have been ‘sample’ schools in projects which were at an advanced stage in the procurement process (that is, they had passed the ‘Close of Dialogue’ point described above), but which had not yet reached ‘Financial Close’; or b. academies where the building projects have not reached financial close, but are either already open, have a signed Funding Agreement, are due open in the next academic year or are making completely new provision. Complexity of local circumstances 11. These criteria have been applied consistently to all projects. The list is intended to describe the result of applying these criteria to schools as simply as possible. However, there are very significant complexities to the programme, as set out above. This gives rise to a wide variety of complicated local circumstances. A number of these are explained below. To avoid creating a very complicated list, a number of simplifying conventions have been adopted to deal with these complexities. These are also described below. a. Joint LEPs – there are a number of instances where a Local Authority, rather than establish its own LEP to deliver school projects, had worked to establish a joint LEP with another Local Authority and would have had its school projects treated as a subsequent ‘wave’ for approval and investment through that LEP. In such cases, it is possible that the initial ‘wave’ of investment for one Local Authority will be unaffected, but that the subsequent ‘wave’ for the second Local Authority will be stopped. This is the case, for example, in Salford (all projects unaffected) and Wigan (most projects stopped); b.
Recommended publications
  • EDUCATION of POOR GIRLS in NORTH WEST ENGLAND C1780 to 1860: a STUDY of WARRINGTON and CHESTER by Joyce Valerie Ireland
    EDUCATION OF POOR GIRLS IN NORTH WEST ENGLAND c1780 to 1860: A STUDY OF WARRINGTON AND CHESTER by Joyce Valerie Ireland A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire September 2005 EDUCATION OF POOR GIRLS IN NORTH WEST ENGLAND cll8Oto 1860 A STUDY OF WARRINGTON AND CHESTER ABSTRACT This study is an attempt to discover what provision there was in North West England in the early nineteenth century for the education of poor girls, using a comparative study of two towns, Warrington and Chester. The existing literature reviewed is quite extensive on the education of the poor generally but there is little that refers specifically to girls. Some of it was useful as background and provided a national framework. In order to describe the context for the study a brief account of early provision for the poor is included. A number of the schools existing in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries continued into the nineteenth and occasionally even into the twentieth centuries and their records became the source material for this study. The eighteenth century and the early nineteenth century were marked by fluctuating fortunes in education, and there was a flurry of activity to revive the schools in both towns in the early nineteenth century. The local archives in the Chester/Cheshire Record Office contain minute books, account books and visitors' books for the Chester Blue Girls' school, Sunday and Working schools, the latter consolidated into one girls' school in 1816, all covering much of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary School Admissions September 2021’ Booklet and Certify That the Information Given in This Application Is Correct
    . Secondary School Admissions September 2021 The information in this booklet relates to year 7 admissions in a secondary school for children who were born between 1 September 2009 and 31 August 2010 inclusive. Apply online by 31 October 2020 @ www.blackburn.gov.uk/admissions 2 | P a g e Dear parents and carers Your child is about to start one of the most important and exciting stages of their education and the information in this booklet will help you choose the school/academy you would prefer your child to attend. Blackburn with Darwen is fast earning a reputation as a great place to learn, and deservedly so, with over 80% of our schools and academies now rated by Ofsted as “good” or “outstanding”. Every high school and academy in Blackburn with Darwen is committed to providing the best opportunities for learning and preparing all children for further education, training and work. It’s not only Blackburn with Darwen’s examination results that are improving, but also the range and quality of what our schools and academies can offer your child. Most of the borough’s secondary schools and academies are in new or newly refurbished buildings, offering state of the art facilities and technology. Many also provide adult learning and health and leisure facilities for the community. In normal circumstances, all schools and academies would welcome you to visit them during their open evenings and open days. This year, due to the ongoing restrictions relating Coronavirus, many schools and academies will be holding virtual online tours with the opportunity for you to submit questions.
    [Show full text]
  • TYPE Aylesbury Grammar School Further Offers Ma
    Moving up to Secondary School in September 2014 Second Round Allocation Positions GRAMMAR SCHOOLS GRAMMAR SCHOOLS - ALLOCATION PROFILE (qualified applicants only) TYPE Further offers made under rule 4 (linked siblings), and some under rule 7 (catchment) to a distance of 1.291 Aylesbury Grammar School Academy miles. Aylesbury High School All applicants offered. Academy Beaconsfield High School All applicants offered. Foundation Burnham Grammar School Further offers made under rule 5 (distance) to 10.456 miles. Academy Chesham Grammar School All applicants offered. Academy Dr Challoner's Grammar School Further offers made under rule 4 (catchment) to a distance of 7.378 miles. Academy Dr Challoner's High School Further offers made under rule 2 (catchment) to a distance of 6.330 miles. Academy John Hampden Grammar School All applicants offered. Academy The Royal Grammar School Further offers made under rule 2 (catchment) and some under rule 6 (distance) to 8.276 miles. Academy The Royal Latin School Further offers made under rule 2 (catchment) some under rule 5 (distance) to 7.661 miles. Academy Sir Henry Floyd Grammar School All applicants offered. Academy Further offers made under rule 2{3}(catchment siblings) and some under rule 2 (catchment), to a distance of Sir William Borlase's Grammar School Academy 0.622 miles. Wycombe High School Further offers made under rule b (catchment) and some under rule d (distance) to 16.957 miles. Academy UPPER SCHOOLS UPPER SCHOOLS - ALLOCATION PROFILE TYPE Further offers made under rule b (catchment), rule c (siblings) and some under rule e (distance) to 4.038 Amersham School Academy miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspire Succeed Achieve Eastleigh.Ac.Uk 2021/22 APPRENTICESHIPS & FULL TIME COURSES
    Inspire Succeed Achieve eastleigh.ac.uk 2021/22 APPRENTICESHIPS & FULL TIME COURSES 2021/22 APPRENTICESHIPS & FULL-TIME COURSES GUIDE CONTENTS WELCOME 03 ENGINEERING 42 WHY EASTLEIGH COLLEGE 04 ENTERPRISE SKILLS 44 A GUIDE TO THE RIGHT LEARNING STYLE 06 EVENT MANAGEMENT 46 FULL TIME STUDY PROGRAMMES 07 HAIRDRESSING 48 APPRENTICESHIPS 08 HR & RECRUITMENT 50 YOUR APPRENTICESHIP JOURNEY 10 KICKSTART 52 REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL COURSES 12 LOGISTICS & SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 54 SUPPORTING YOUR SUCCESS 13 MEDIA MAKE-UP & HAIR ARTISTRY 56 COLLEGE FACILITIES 15 MOTOR VEHICLE 58 WHAT OUR LEARNERS THINK 16 NURSING, HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE 60 ENGLISH & MATHS 17 PLUMBING 62 PUBLIC SERVICES 64 ACCOUNTANCY & FINANCE 18 REFRIGERATION 66 ART, DESIGN & MEDIA 20 SPORT & FITNESS 68 BEAUTY THERAPIES 22 SUPPORTED LEARNING 70 BUILT ENVIRONMENT 24 TRAVEL & TOURISM 72 BUSINESS 26 CARPENTRY 28 LIFE AFTER COLLEGE 74 CATERING & HOSPITALITY 30 HOW TO APPLY 75 CONSTRUCTION 32 DENTAL 34 DIGITAL INDUSTRIES 36 EARLY YEARS, CARE & EDUCATION 38 ELECTRICAL 40 2021/22 APPRENTICESHIPS & FULL TIME COURSES GUIDE WELCOME You’re at an exciting time, taking We’ll expect you to share our values, namely ambition, resilience, professionalism and your first steps away from school respect. In return, you will not be short of or sixth form and towards your enriching experiences; talks from experts, future career. workshops, employer visits, trips and industry competitions are built into our courses Here at Eastleigh College we specialise in to ensure we leave no stone unturned in technical and professional courses and providing relevant and fulfilling extra-curricular apprenticeships. As you read through this opportunities for you. prospectus and explore our social media and website, you’ll see we offer so much more than Don’t take our word for it, listen to those who just qualifications - you’ll gain invaluable work have already studied with us - 93% would experience, industry knowledge, insight and recommend us to a friend! essential skills.
    [Show full text]
  • A Place for Every Child
    A Place for Every Child The Vision for School Organisation in the City of Wolverhampton 2018-20 wolverhampton.gov.uk City of Wolverhampton Education Place Planning 2 City of Wolverhampton Council wolverhampton.gov.uk Contents CONTENTS 4 Chapter 1 34 Chapter 8 Executive summary Early Years Provision 18 Chapter 2 36 Chapter 9 Primary School Infant and Junior School Organisation Provision 20 Chapter 3 37 Chapter 10 Secondary School Post-16 Provision Organisation 22 Chapter 4 39 Chapter 11 The Introduction of Alternative Provision Additional School Places 27 Chapter 5 40 Chapter 12 Removal of Estate Management Maintained Provision/ Discontinuance of 41 Chapter 13 Maintained Provision Strategy Review 30 Chapter 6 42 Chapter 14 All-through Schools Resources 31 Chapter 7 43 Appendices Specialist Provision wolverhampton.gov.uk A Place for Every Child 3 Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary The main challenge that the City of Wolverhampton faces in relation to the organisation of school provision, is ensuring that sufficient high- quality school places are available to meet the needs of local communities across the City. Driven by a 24% increase in births between 2002 and 2016, levels of demand for school provision have increased significantly in recent years. In excess of 3,000 additional places have been commissioned since 2012 in primary schools and since 2017 in secondary schools, to cater for the demographic uplift. The recently witnessed increase in demand for primary provision in the City, has already started to impact on the City’s secondary estate and significant additional capacity will be required to cater for future cohorts.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Learning Course Programme 2014/15 3 Autumn (September 2014)
    community use Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council Sustainable Neighbourhoods Service Community Learning Room 423, 4th Floor, Old Town Hall Tel: (01254) 585544 Course Programme Email: [email protected] www.blackburn.gov.uk 2014/2015 Welcome Enrolment Information Our community learning programme continues for another year, with the aim of Enrolment for most of our courses is done in the learning centres and/or schools, helping adults to learn new skills and develop their interests. although some of the workshops can be booked over the telephone – please see each course for specific enrolment information. Short courses in the community are available on a range of subjects, some being 2hr workshops and others lasting for a number of weeks. Enrolment for Autumn (September onwards) Courses Our aim is to make sure you enjoy learning with us and help you achieve. Venue Date Time Courses are designed for general interest (leisure learning), as well as to support Audley & Queen’s Park NLC From Mon 15 Sept 2014 9am-5pm (9-4pm on Fridays) you to move onto further learning or employment, as well as improve your health and wellbeing. Bank Top NLC From Mon 15 Sept 2014 9am-5pm (9-4pm on Fridays) See where learning could take you! Enrolment for Winter (Jan onwards) Courses Our courses run in the following venues: Audle Venue Date Time y & Q Audley & Queen’s Park NLC From Mon 5 Jan 2015 9am-5pm (9-4pm on Fridays) Audley & Queen’s Park Neighbourhood ue e n Learning Centre ’s Bank Top NLC From Mon 5 Jan 2015 9am-5pm (9-4pm on
    [Show full text]
  • Connected Networks
    ConnectEd Networks A unique Wolverhampton based partnership of over 100 local schools CN One CN Four CN Six and Seven Eastfield Nursery School Bantock Primary School Aldersley High School Eastfield Primary School Castlecroft Primary School Berrybrook Primary School Green Park Special School Highfields School Bushbury Nursery School Holy Rosary Catholic Primary Academy Merridale Primary School Bushbury Hill Primary School Moseley Park School Nishkam Primary School Dovecotes Primary School St Matthias School Penn Hall Special School Elston Hall Primary School Stow Heath Primary School Pennfields Special School Fallings Park Primary School Stow Lawn Primary School Smestow School Low Hill Nursery School Villiers Primary School Springdale Primary School Moreton Community School St Michael’s Catholic Primary Academy Ormiston NEW Academy CN Two Uplands Junior School Northwood Park Primary School Bilston Church of England Primary School Warstones Primary School Our Lady and St Chad Catholic Academy Bilston Nursery School Westacre Infant School Palmers Cross Primary School Field View Primary School Rakegate Primary School Holy Trinity Catholic Primary School St Mary’s Catholic Primary Academy Loxdale Primary School Westcroft School Ormiston SWB Academy Whitgreave Primary School St Martin’s Primary School Wilkinson Primary School CN Three CN Eight CN Five Colton Hills School Ashmore Park Nursery School Broadmeadow Special Nursery School Goldthorn Park Primary School Coppice Performing Arts School Christ Church Infant School Graiseley Primary School
    [Show full text]
  • Art, Craft and Design Education
    Making a mark: art, craft and design education 2008/11 This report evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of art, craft and design education in schools and colleges in England. It is based principally on subject inspections of 96 primary schools, 91 secondary schools and seven special schools between 2008 and 2011. This includes five visits in each phase to focus on an aspect of good practice. The report also draws on institutional inspections, 69 subject inspections in colleges, and visits to a sample of art galleries. Part A focuses on the key inspection findings in the context of the continued popularity of the subject with pupils and students. Part B considers how well the concerns about inclusion, creativity and drawing raised in Ofsted’s 2008 report, Drawing together: art, craft and design in schools, have been addressed. Contents Executive summary 1 Key findings 3 Recommendations 4 The context of art, craft and design education in England 5 Part A: Art, craft and design education in schools and colleges 6 Achievement in art, craft and design 7 Teaching in art, craft and design 14 The curriculum in art, craft and design 25 Leadership and management in art, craft and design 33 Part B: Making a mark on the individual and institution 39 Progress on the recommendations of the last triennial report Promoting achievement for all 41 Providing enrichment opportunities for all 46 Developing artists, craftmakers and designers of the future 48 Focusing on key subject skills: drawing 51 Further information 57 Notes 58 Further information 59 Publications by Ofsted 59 Other publications 59 Websites 59 Annex A: Schools and colleges visited 60 Executive summary Executive summary Children see before they speak, make marks before they Stages 1 and 2 and was no better than satisfactory at Key write, build before they walk.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Supportive Mentoring Relationship to Aid Independent Action Research
    Using a supportive mentoring relationship to aid independent action research This summary was commissioned by the National Teacher Research Panel for the Teacher Research Conference 2006, which explored and celebrated teacher engagement in and with research. All conference materials are available at www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/ntrp Aims of the project Within the English classroom, the focus was on releasing the capacity for imagination within the constraints of the The primary aim of this project was to provide a supportive, Literacy Strategy. This research was conducted using a pro-active and practical mentoring partnership in which high ability Year 9 group. In Geography, the focus was the individual teachers could conduct their independent action examination of ways of engaging pupils, using Gardner’s research. The results were actually far more significant Research on Multiple Intelligences, and to structure a than the original aim suggested and extended beyond the series of lessons aimed at fulfilling the criteria for each of boundaries of the action research itself. Research the intelligences. This research was conducted using a top mentoring led to tangible and long-term benefits both for set Year 8 Geography group. It was not until later that the our personal development and our professional importance of the research mentoring aspect of these development as teachers. The key findings are individual action research projects became apparent. Once summarised below. we had established a collaborative relationship, we engaged with research literature to help us develop an Dimensions of the study approach to mentoring from which we would both benefit. Bitterne Park School is an LEA comprehensive with 1400 pupils and 90 members of staff situated within the eastern Methods and strategies area of the city of Southampton.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education
    Buckinghamshire Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education Annual Report 2017-18 Learning and growing through challenging RE 1 Contents Page No. Foreword from the Chair……………………………………………………………….. 1. Standards and quality of provision of RE: 2. Managing the SACRE and Partnership with the LA and Other Key Stakeholders: 3. Effectiveness of the Agreed Syllabus: 4. Collective Worship: 5. SACRE and School Improvement: Appendix 1: Examination data…………………….………………………………… Appendix 2: Diversity in Christianity ……………………………………………… Appendix 3: SACRE Membership and attendance for the year 2016/2017…… 2 Learning and growing through challenging RE Foreword from the Chair of SACRE September 2017 - July 2018 As with any organisation it is the inspiration given by the members that provides the character. I shall focus on some of the creativity we have valued in Bucks SACRE this year both from our members and during our visits to schools. In addition, we receive wise counsel from our Education Officer at Bucks CC, Katherine Wells and our RE Adviser Bill Moore. At our meeting in October we learned that Suma Din our Muslim deputy had become a school governor and would no longer fulfil her role with SACRE. However, her legacy to us is her book published by the Institute of Education Press entitled ‘Muslim Mothers and their children’s schooling.’ See SACRED 7, for a review. (For this and all other references to SACRED see the website at the end of this section). In her contribution to SACRED 6 Suma wrote; From the Qur’an, I understand my role as being a ‘steward’ on this earth; one who will take care, take responsibility and hand on a legacy to those who come after them.
    [Show full text]
  • Going to School in Nottingham 2013/142017/18 Information About A
    Going to school in Nottingham 2013/142017/18 Information about a Appendix 1 – admission criteria for secondary schools and academies in Nottingham City Admission criteria for secondary schools and academies in Nottingham City. The following pages set out the admission criteria for the 2017/18 school year for each secondary school and academy in Nottingham City. If a school receives more applications than it has places available, this means the school is oversubscribed and places are offered using the school’s admission criteria. The table below lists the secondary schools and academies in Nottingham City: School/academy name Type of school Bluecoat Academy Voluntary Aided Academy Bluecoat Beechdale Academy Academy The Bulwell Academy Academy Djanogly City Academy Academy Ellis Guilford School & Sports College Community The Farnborough Academy Academy The Fernwood School Academy Nottingham Academy Academy The Nottingham Emmanuel School Voluntary Aided Academy Nottingham Free School Free School Nottingham Girls' Academy Academy Nottingham University Academy of Science & Technology 14-19 Academy Nottingham University Samworth Academy Academy The Oakwood Academy Academy Top Valley Academy Academy The Trinity Catholic School Voluntary Aided Academy For a list of the secondary schools and academies oversubscribed at the closing date in year 7 in the 2016/17 school year, see page 23 of the ‘Going to School in Nottingham 2017/18’ booklet; and for information regarding school/academy addresses, contact details for admission enquiries, etc. see pages 66 to 68 of the booklet. Admissions Policy 2017/18 Bluecoat Church of England Academy Bluecoat Academy offers an all though education from age 4 – 19. The Academy is both distinctively Christian and inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • ACADEMY and VOLUNTARY AIDED SCHOOLS ADMINISTERED by DEMOCRATIC SERVICES – August 2021
    ACADEMY AND VOLUNTARY AIDED SCHOOLS ADMINISTERED BY DEMOCRATIC SERVICES – August 2021 Primary Schools:‐ Secondary Schools:‐ Abbey Primary School (Mansfield) (5 – 11 Academy) The Alderman White School (11‐18) Abbey Road Primary School (Rushcliffe) ‐ Academy (5 – 11 Academy) Ashfield School (11 – 18) All Saints Primary, Newark (5 – 11 Voluntary Aided) Bramcote College (11‐18) Bracken Lane Primary Academy (5 – 11 Academy) Chilwell School (11‐18) Brookside Primary (5 – 11 Academy) East Leake Academy (11 – 18) Burntstump Seely Church of England Primary Academy (5 – 11) Magnus Church of England Academy (11 – 18) Burton Joyce Primary (5 – 11 Academy) Manor Academy (11‐18) Cropwell Bishop Primary (5 – 11 Academy) Outwood Academy Portland (11 – 18) Crossdale Drive Primary (5 – 11 Academy) Outwood Academy Valley (11 – 18) Flintham Primary (5 – 11 Academy) Quarrydale Academy (11 – 18) Haggonfields Primary School (3‐11) Queen Elizabeth’s Academy (11 – 18) Harworth Church of England Academy (4‐11) Retford Oaks Academy (11 – 18) Heymann Primary (5 – 11 Academy) Samworth Church Academy Hillocks Primary ‐ Academy (5 – 11 Academy) Selston High School (11 – 18) Hucknall National C of E Primary (5 – 11 Academy) The Garibaldi School (11‐18) John Clifford Primary School (5 – 11 Academy) The Fernwood School (11‐ 18) (City School) Keyworth Primary and Nursery (5 – 11 Academy) The Holgate Academy (11 – 18) Langold Dyscarr Community School (3‐11) The Meden SAchool (11 – 18) Larkfields Junior School (7 – 11 Foundation) The Newark Academy (11 – 18) Norbridge Academy
    [Show full text]