DOCSLIB.ORG

2021-2022 National Funding Formula Provisional Allocations and Authority Proforma Tool Contact Officer Terry Shaw, Finance Manager

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021-2022 National Funding Formula Provisional Allocations and Authority Proforma Tool Contact Officer Terry Shaw, Finance Manager City of Wolverhampton Council SCHOOLS’ FORUM Date 3 December 2020 Report title 2021-2022 National Funding Formula Provisional Allocations and Authority Proforma Tool Contact Officer Terry Shaw, Finance Manager Email address: [email protected] Summary In July 2020, the Department for Education published the National Funding Formula Provisional Allocations for the Schools Block, the High Needs Block and the Central Schools and Services Block for the 2021-2022 Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG). The purpose of this report is to notify Schools’ Forum Members of the indicative allocations and the process for setting budgets funded by the DSG in 2021-2022. The Early Years Block Provisional Allocation is expected to be published by the Department for Education in late November 2020, and a report will be received by Forum in February detailing the proposed budget for approval. Decision Members of Schools’ Forum are asked to note: The indicative allocations and the process for setting budgets funded by the DSG in 2021-2022. Schedule of Background Papers - Schools’ Forum High Needs Sub-Group Meeting Report 12.11.2020 (Appendix 3) 1.0 Schools Block Allocation 1.1 For the financial year 2021-2022 it will remain the duty of Local Authorities to set a local funding formula, in consultation with their Schools’ forum, to determine the allocation of funding from the School’s Block of the DSG to schools in the City. Central government has recently restated its intention to move to a National Funding formula (NFF) and already uses this formula to determine the funding allocated at an area level. 1.2 At the January 2020 meeting of Schools’ forum, members voted to fully adopt all factors of the NFF. At that stage the forecast suggested that this implementation may not be affordable within the City’s indicative allocation, and so forum voted to maintain the NFF minimum funding guarantee (MFG) of 1.84% and cap maximum increases at a school level to reduce the overall cost as required. When the final allocation was received, it was possible to implement full NFF with 1.84% MFG and no cap by utilising an element of the funding allocated for the growth fund. 1.3 The City of Wolverhampton’s 2021-2022 modelling Authority Proforma Tool (APT) was made available by the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) in September to allow the Authority to calculate its Schools Block requirement for 2021-2022. 1.4 The Council has been notified of an indicative Schools Block National Funding Formula allocation of £219,033,201 million for 2021-2022 and the APT modelling tool indicates that it will be affordable to implement full NFF factors with the recommended Minimum Funding Guarantee of 2% and no capping factor. 1.5 The actual DSG allocation is expected to be published in the third week in December 2020 in line with the previous two years. This will be based on October 2020 census data. It is assumed that this will provide sufficient funding to implement the NFF as planned, however should this not be affordable within the allocation, then the Authority may have to present a range of options to ensure its affordability and consult with schools upon the available options. 1.6 If there is a requirement to consult following the official DSG Allocation, then it would be the intention of the Authority to consult with schools in early January 2021 via an online survey and present the results and options to forum at the January 2021 meeting. Schools’ forum will be asked to recommend the funding formula to Cabinet at the January meeting, and the final budgets will be published and presented to Schools’ Forum at the February 2021 meeting. 1.7 The uplifted National Funding Formula factors for 2021-2022 are shown as Appendix 1 and a comparison of the funding per school for 2021-2022 and 2020-2021 is shown as Appendix 2. It must be noted that this is based on the ESFA’s current APT model which uses census data from October 2019. 2.0 High Needs Block Provisional Allocation 2021-2022 2.1 The total High Needs Block provisional settlement for the City of Wolverhampton Council for 2021-2022 was published in July 2020 is £46,641,863, which is a provisional increase of £4,935,965 when comparing to the allocation for 2020-2021. Work has begun to determine a 2021-2022 High Needs Block budget, in conjunction with the School’s Forum High Needs Sub-Group, and the final budget will be presented to Forum for approval at the February meeting. 2.2 After academies recoupment, the allocation to the Council is £41,255,627 as shown in the table below. NFF Provisional Allocation 2021- 2022 Breakdown of High Needs Block Allocation for 2021-2022 (£) High Needs Block Provisional Allocation 46,641,863 Deduct Academies Recoupment (5,386,236) High Needs Block DSG Allocation following recoupment 41,255,627 Deduct overspend from previous year 0 Total DSG Allocation after recoupment & previous year overspend £41,255,627 3.0 Central School Services Block Allocation 3.1 The Central School Services Block provisional settlement for the City of Wolverhampton Council for 2021-2022 published in July 2020 is £1,904,826, which is a provisional decrease of £37,595 when comparing to the allocation for 2020-2021. A report will be presented to School’s Forum at the February meeting with a proposed CSSB budget to agree. 4.0 Growth Fund 4.1 The required budget for growth funding in 2021-2022 has been estimated to be £2.0 million. The Council will be notified of the allocation in December and this will be discussed with forum at the January meeting. APPENDIX 1 City of Wolverhampton National Funding Formula factors for 2021-2022 CWC CWC National recommended recommended National Funding rates rates Funding Funding Formula 2021-2022 2020-2021 Factor Formula 2021- (with Area (with Area 2020-2021 2022 Cost Cost Adjustments) Adjustment) Age- Primary 3,123.00 3,133.52 2,857.00 2,866.63 Basic Weighted entitlement Pupil Unit Secondary: KS3 4,404.00 4,418.84 4,018.00 4,031.54 (AWPU) Secondary: KS4 4,963.00 4,979.73 4,561.00 4,576.37 Needs Led Factors Free School Deprivation Meals Primary FSM 460.00 461.55 450.00 451.52 Secondary FSM 460.00 461.55 Ever6 FSM: Primary 575.00 576.94 560.00 561.89 Through a Ever6 FSM: combination of Secondary 840.00 842.83 815.00 817.75 FSM and IDACI IDACI Band Bands F Primary 215.00 215.72 210.00 210.71 Secondary 310.00 311.04 300.00 301.01 IDACI Band E Primary 260.00 260.88 250.00 250.84 Secondary 415.00 416.40 405.00 406.36 IDACI Band D Primary 410.00 411.38 375.00 376.26 Secondary 580.00 581.95 535.00 536.80 IDACI Band C Primary 445.00 446.50 405.00 406.36 Secondary 630.00 632.12 580.00 581.95 IDACI Band B Primary 475.00 476.60 435.00 436.47 Secondary 680.00 682.29 625.00 627.11 IDACI Band A Primary 620.00 622.09 600.00 602.02 Secondary 865.00 867.92 840.00 842.83 CWC National recommended CWC Funding rates National recommended Funding Funding rates Formula 2021-2022 Factor Formula 2020-2021 2021- (with Area 2020-2021 (with Area Cost 2022 Cost Adjustment) Adjustments) Low Prior Primary 1,095.00 1,098.69 1,065.00 1,068.59 Attainment Secondary 1,660.00 1,665.59 1,610.00 1,615.43 Pupils with Primary a first 550.00 551.85 535.00 536.80 language English As an other than Additional English Language (EAL) attract Secondary funding for 1,485.00 1,490.00 1,440.00 1,444.85 up to 3 years Counts pupils Primary entering a 900.00 903.03 875.00 877.95 school during the last 3 Pupil Mobility academic years but Secondary did not 1,290.00 1,294.35 1,250.00 1,254.21 start in August or September) School/ Premises Led Factors Schools located in Primary areas - where Sparsity pupils have to travel; Secondary or small schools - Primary 117,800.00 118,196.99 114,400.00 114,785.53 Lump Sum Secondary 117,800.00 118,196.99 APPENDIX 2 Indicative Funding per School 2021-2022 and comparison with allocations for 2020-2021 NFF per pupil 2021-22 Pupil funding used Numbers for the (Based on minimum per Census data pupil funding Indicative NFF from October allocation funding for NFF funding School Name Phase 2019) 2021-22 2021-22 for 2020-21 Bantock Primary School Primary 398.0 £5,156 £2,077,791 £1,827,433 Berrybrook Primary School Primary 211.0 £5,244 £1,106,435 £1,067,286 Bilston Church of England Primary Primary 416.0 £4,933 £2,095,458 £1,994,667 School Bushbury Hill Primary School Primary 272.0 £5,187 £1,447,365 £1,329,357 Bushbury Lane Academy Primary 196.0 £5,339 £1,046,429 £974,607 Castlecroft Primary School Primary 221.0 £4,323 £972,285 £898,954 Christ Church (C of E) Infant and Primary 174.0 £4,284 £756,772 £712,306 Nursery Christ Church (C of E) Junior Primary 236.0 £4,262 £1,022,818 £979,100 School Claregate Primary School Primary 386.0 £4,209 £1,663,987 £1,598,889 Corpus Christi Catholic Primary Primary 196.0 £4,811 £943,033 £858,937 Academy Deyncourt Primary School Primary 314.0 £4,293 £1,348,113 £1,237,268 Dovecotes Primary School Primary 267.0 £5,131 £1,401,352 £1,272,928 Dunstall Hill Primary School Primary 401.0 £5,058 £2,061,830 £1,780,518 East Park Academy Primary 594.0 £4,611 £2,739,177 £2,610,282 Eastfield Primary School Primary 405.0 £4,928 £2,078,628 £2,030,297 Edward the Elder Primary School Primary 216.0 £4,841 £1,056,769 £978,212 Elston Hall Primary School Primary 632.0 £4,253 £2,687,962 £2,497,119 Fallings Park Primary School Primary 600.0 £4,846 £2,959,792 £2,658,059 Field View Primary School Primary 413.0 £5,030 £2,105,078 £2,010,695 Goldthorn Park Primary School Primary 403.0 £4,552 £1,873,955 £1,826,835 Graiseley Primary School Primary 209.0 £5,280 £1,127,587 £1,047,209 Grove Primary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Place for Every Child
    A Place for Every Child The Vision for School Organisation in the City of Wolverhampton 2018-20 wolverhampton.gov.uk City of Wolverhampton Education Place Planning 2 City of Wolverhampton Council wolverhampton.gov.uk Contents CONTENTS 4 Chapter 1 34 Chapter 8 Executive summary Early Years Provision 18 Chapter 2 36 Chapter 9 Primary School Infant and Junior School Organisation Provision 20 Chapter 3 37 Chapter 10 Secondary School Post-16 Provision Organisation 22 Chapter 4 39 Chapter 11 The Introduction of Alternative Provision Additional School Places 27 Chapter 5 40 Chapter 12 Removal of Estate Management Maintained Provision/ Discontinuance of 41 Chapter 13 Maintained Provision Strategy Review 30 Chapter 6 42 Chapter 14 All-through Schools Resources 31 Chapter 7 43 Appendices Specialist Provision wolverhampton.gov.uk A Place for Every Child 3 Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary The main challenge that the City of Wolverhampton faces in relation to the organisation of school provision, is ensuring that sufficient high- quality school places are available to meet the needs of local communities across the City. Driven by a 24% increase in births between 2002 and 2016, levels of demand for school provision have increased significantly in recent years. In excess of 3,000 additional places have been commissioned since 2012 in primary schools and since 2017 in secondary schools, to cater for the demographic uplift. The recently witnessed increase in demand for primary provision in the City, has already started to impact on the City’s secondary estate and significant additional capacity will be required to cater for future cohorts.
    [Show full text]
  • Connected Networks
    ConnectEd Networks A unique Wolverhampton based partnership of over 100 local schools CN One CN Four CN Six and Seven Eastfield Nursery School Bantock Primary School Aldersley High School Eastfield Primary School Castlecroft Primary School Berrybrook Primary School Green Park Special School Highfields School Bushbury Nursery School Holy Rosary Catholic Primary Academy Merridale Primary School Bushbury Hill Primary School Moseley Park School Nishkam Primary School Dovecotes Primary School St Matthias School Penn Hall Special School Elston Hall Primary School Stow Heath Primary School Pennfields Special School Fallings Park Primary School Stow Lawn Primary School Smestow School Low Hill Nursery School Villiers Primary School Springdale Primary School Moreton Community School St Michael’s Catholic Primary Academy Ormiston NEW Academy CN Two Uplands Junior School Northwood Park Primary School Bilston Church of England Primary School Warstones Primary School Our Lady and St Chad Catholic Academy Bilston Nursery School Westacre Infant School Palmers Cross Primary School Field View Primary School Rakegate Primary School Holy Trinity Catholic Primary School St Mary’s Catholic Primary Academy Loxdale Primary School Westcroft School Ormiston SWB Academy Whitgreave Primary School St Martin’s Primary School Wilkinson Primary School CN Three CN Eight CN Five Colton Hills School Ashmore Park Nursery School Broadmeadow Special Nursery School Goldthorn Park Primary School Coppice Performing Arts School Christ Church Infant School Graiseley Primary School
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Schools
    List of West Midlands Schools This document outlines the academic and social criteria you need to meet depending on your current secondary school in order to be eligible to apply. For APP City/Employer Insights: If your school has ‘FSM’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling. If your school has ‘FSM or FG’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling or be among the first generation in your family to attend university. For APP Reach: Applicants need to have achieved at least 5 9-5 (A*-C) GCSES and be eligible for free school meals OR first generation to university (regardless of school attended) Exceptions for the academic and social criteria can be made on a case-by-case basis for children in care or those with extenuating circumstances. Please refer to socialmobility.org.uk/criteria-programmes for more details. If your school is not on the list below, or you believe it has been wrongly categorised, or you have any other questions please contact the Social Mobility Foundation via telephone on 0207 183 1189 between 9am – 5:30pm Monday to Friday. School or College Name Local Authority Academic Criteria Social Criteria Abbot Beyne School Staffordshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Alcester Academy Warwickshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Alcester Grammar School Warwickshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Aldersley High School Wolverhampton 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Aldridge
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Contextual Data at the University of Warwick Please Use
    Use of contextual data at the University of Warwick Please use the table below to check whether your school meets the eligibility criteria for a contextual offer. For more information about our contextual offer please visit our website or contact the Undergraduate Admissions Team. School Name School Postcode School Performance Free School Meals 'Y' indicates a school which meets the 'Y' indicates a school which meets the Free School Meal criteria. Schools are listed in alphabetical order. school performance citeria. 'N/A' indicates a school for which the data is not available. 6th Form at Swakeleys UB10 0EJ N Y Abbey College, Ramsey PE26 1DG Y N Abbey Court Community Special School ME2 3SP N Y Abbey Grange Church of England Academy LS16 5EA Y N Abbey Hill School and Performing Arts College ST2 8LG Y Y Abbey Hill School and Technology College, Stockton TS19 8BU Y Y Abbey School, Faversham ME13 8RZ Y Y Abbeyfield School, Northampton NN4 8BU Y Y Abbeywood Community School BS34 8SF Y N Abbot Beyne School and Arts College, Burton Upon Trent DE15 0JL Y Y Abbot's Lea School, Liverpool L25 6EE Y Y Abbotsfield School UB10 0EX Y N Abbotsfield School, Uxbridge UB10 0EX Y N School Name School Postcode School Performance Free School Meals Abbs Cross School and Arts College RM12 4YQ Y N Abbs Cross School, Hornchurch RM12 4YB Y N Abingdon And Witney College OX14 1GG Y NA Abraham Darby Academy TF7 5HX Y Y Abraham Guest Academy WN5 0DQ Y Y Abraham Moss High School, Manchester M8 5UF Y Y Academy 360 SR4 9BA Y Y Accrington Academy BB5 4FF Y Y Acklam Grange
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 715KB
    LBP0018 Written evidence submitted by The Northern Powerhouse Education Consortium Education Select Committee Left behind white pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds Inquiry SUBMISSION FROM THE NORTHERN POWERHOUSE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM Introduction and summary of recommendations Northern Powerhouse Education Consortium are a group of organisations with focus on education and disadvantage campaigning in the North of England, including SHINE, Northern Powerhouse Partnership (NPP) and Tutor Trust. This is a joint submission to the inquiry, acting together as ‘The Northern Powerhouse Education Consortium’. We make the case that ethnicity is a major factor in the long term disadvantage gap, in particular white working class girls and boys. These issues are highly concentrated in left behind towns and the most deprived communities across the North of England. In the submission, we recommend strong actions for Government in particular: o New smart Opportunity Areas across the North of England. o An Emergency Pupil Premium distribution arrangement for 2020-21, including reform to better tackle long-term disadvantage. o A Catch-up Premium for the return to school. o Support to Northern Universities to provide additional temporary capacity for tutoring, including a key role for recent graduates and students to take part in accredited training. About the Organisations in our consortium SHINE (Support and Help IN Education) are a charity based in Leeds that help to raise the attainment of disadvantaged children across the Northern Powerhouse. Trustees include Lord Jim O’Neill, also a co-founder of SHINE, and Raksha Pattni. The Northern Powerhouse Partnership’s Education Committee works as part of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership (NPP) focusing on the Education and Skills agenda in the North of England.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Information
    Freedom of Information Enquiry Number - FS108955071 Request and Response: Q: The number of children that have been allocated secondary schools in March 2019 and where they have been allocated to, including grammar school places. A: Preference School Total Bristnall Hall Academy 187 George Salter Academy 269 Holly Lodge High School 290 Oldbury Academy 319 Ormiston Forge Academy 202 Ormiston Sandwell Community Academy 217 Perryfields High School, Maths and Computing College 162 Phoenix Collegiate 325 Q3 Academy 192 Q3 Academy Langley 237 RSA Academy 192 Sandwell Academy 192 Shenstone Lodge School 11 Shireland Collegiate Academy 209 St Michael's Church of England High School 254 Stuart Bathurst Catholic High School, College of Performing Arts 82 The ACE Academy (now Q3 - Tipton) 297 The Meadows School 31 The Westminster School 18 West Bromwich Collegiate Academy 175 Wodensborough Ormiston Academy 224 Wood Green Academy 175 XX Wood Green Sport 12 [IL0: UNCLASSIFIED] Preference School Total ZB Bishop Vesey's Grammar School 8 ZB Broadway School 1 ZB Cardinal Wiseman Catholic School 1 ZB City Academy 2 ZB City Academy Birmingham 1 ZB Four Dwellings Academy 6 ZB George Dixon Academy 11 ZB Great Barr Academy 8 ZB Hamstead Hall Academy 19 ZB Harborne Academy 2 ZB Hillcrest School - Specialist Maths & Computing College 6 ZB Jewellery Quarter Academy 3 ZB King Edward VI Aston School 10 ZB King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys 7 ZB King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Girls 7 ZB King Edward VI Handsworth Grammar School for Boys 24 ZB King Edward
    [Show full text]
  • Barnhurst Lane Pitches Adjacent Aldersley School Barnhurst Lane Pendeford
    Gareth Dwight: Planning Assistant – Planning Committee 20/02/2018 17/00669/FUL Mrs Rebecca Duggan Councillor Val Chapman Councillor Paul Fieldhouse BILBROOK Barnhurst Lane Pitches Adjacent Aldersley School Barnhurst Lane Pendeford Ancillary changing facilities to support existing FA standard sports pitches 1. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING HISTORY 1.1 Site Description 1.1.1 The application relates to a 10 hectare multi-pitch grass playing field which was granted consent in 2013, comprising 5 senior soccer pitches, 1 junior soccer pitch and 1 mini-soccer pitch (12/00863/FUL). 1.1.2 The site is situated off Barnhurst Lane in Bilbrook on the District boundary with Wolverhampton, within the West Midlands Green Belt. 1.1.3 There is residential development to the east, Aldersely High School to the south, and open grassland/woodland further to the west and north. 1.1.4 Approximately 60% of the sports pitches fall within the borough of South Staffordshire District Council, with the remaining 40% within Wolverhampton City Council. 1.1.5 The application site itself concerns the south-eastern corner of the playing fields, near the site entrance off Barnhurst Lane. The site falls wholly within the South Staffordshire District boundary. 1.2 Planning History 2015: Site entrance sign and site sponsorship sign, Advertisement Consent granted, 15/00400/ADV 2014: Removal of condition no1 of permission 12/00301/FUL, Approved, 14/00613/VAR 2013: Variation of condition 3 of permission 12/00863/FUL to amend operational hours, Approved, 13/00459/VAR 2012: New 10-hectare (25-acre) multi-pitch grass playing field plus vehicle parking, fencing and landscaping [major development], Approved, 12/00863/FUL 2012: Creation and provision of new vehicular access and turning area, construction of temporary haul road, transitional material storage area and site hut in association with proposed works to Aldersley High School, Approved, 12/00301/FUL Gareth Dwight: Planning Assistant – Planning Committee 20/02/2018 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversubscribed Or Not- Oversubscribed
    [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED] Response to Request for Information Reference FOI 000890 Date 15 February 2017 Schools in Wolverhampton – Oversubscribed or Not- Oversubscribed Request: Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, please supply the following: 1 A list of all secondary, middle and upper schools in Wolverhampton and whether they were oversubscribed or not-oversubscribed on national offer day 2017 (1st March). Please include each school’s Unique Reference Number (URN), DFE code, or address/postcode to allow us to identify each relevant school without ambiguity. We define a school to be oversubscribed if, and only if, at least one on-time applicant was refused a place and the applicant did not receive an offer from any higher preference school. If there were no refusals to on-time applicants - even if the school was unable to accept one or more late applications, or admitted over its published admission number - then we do not consider this school to be oversubscribed. If you use a different definition of oversubscription, then please make this clear in the response. Aldersley High School – 336/5402 - Not oversubscribed Colton Hills Community School – 336/4133 – Not oversubscribed Coppice Performing Arts School – 336/4128 - Oversubscribed Heath Park – 336/4134 - Oversubscribed Highfields School – 336/4113 – Oversubscribed Moreton Community School – 336/4139 - Not oversubscribed Moseley Park Academy – 336/4000 - Not oversubscribed North East Wolverhampton Academy – 336/6906 - Not oversubscribed Our Lady and St Chad Catholic Sports
    [Show full text]
  • Secondaryschoolspendinganaly
    www.tutor2u.net Analysis of Resources Spend by School Total Spending Per Pupil Learning Learning ICT Learning Resources (not ICT Learning Resources (not School Resources ICT) Total Resources ICT) Total Pupils (FTE) £000 £000 £000 £/pupil £/pupil £/pupil 000 Swanlea School 651 482 1,133 £599.2 £443.9 £1,043.1 1,086 Staunton Community Sports College 234 192 426 £478.3 £393.6 £871.9 489 The Skinners' Company's School for Girls 143 324 468 £465.0 £1,053.5 £1,518.6 308 The Charter School 482 462 944 £444.6 £425.6 £870.2 1,085 PEMBEC High School 135 341 476 £441.8 £1,117.6 £1,559.4 305 Cumberland School 578 611 1,189 £430.9 £455.1 £885.9 1,342 St John Bosco Arts College 434 230 664 £420.0 £222.2 £642.2 1,034 Deansfield Community School, Specialists In Media Arts 258 430 688 £395.9 £660.4 £1,056.4 651 South Shields Community School 285 253 538 £361.9 £321.7 £683.6 787 Babington Community Technology College 268 290 558 £350.2 £378.9 £729.1 765 Queensbridge School 225 225 450 £344.3 £343.9 £688.2 654 Pent Valley Technology College 452 285 737 £339.2 £214.1 £553.3 1,332 Kemnal Technology College 366 110 477 £330.4 £99.6 £430.0 1,109 The Maplesden Noakes School 337 173 510 £326.5 £167.8 £494.3 1,032 The Folkestone School for Girls 325 309 635 £310.9 £295.4 £606.3 1,047 Abbot Beyne School 260 134 394 £305.9 £157.6 £463.6 851 South Bromsgrove Community High School 403 245 649 £303.8 £184.9 £488.8 1,327 George Green's School 338 757 1,096 £299.7 £670.7 £970.4 1,129 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys 211 309 520 £297.0 £435.7 £732.7 709 Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Building Schools for the Future Announcement of Monday 5 July 2010
    Impact of Building Schools for the Future announcement of Monday 5 July 2010 1. This list sets out the impact on schools of the announcement on Building Schools for the Future (BSF) made by the Secretary of State for Education on Monday 5 July 2010. It has been produced by Partnerships for Schools (PfS) after validation at senior level in Local Authorities and rigorously checked by the Department for Education, including by making telephone contact with every Local Authority listed and with all affected Academy sponsors. 2. This process of checking has been necessary because of the complexity of the BSF process, to ensure the accuracy of this list and, in particular, because, to date, PfS has collected data from Local Authorities about BSF schools as they progressed. Rather than micromanaging individual schools, PfS has relied on Local Authority-level information. 3. All Local Authorities which were participating in BSF are listed, plus those who have had one school pathfinders or academies built or being built through the Partnerships for Schools Academies Framework. That is 102 Local Authorities out of a total of 152. And every school which was included within a Local Authority project is listed and is categorised as either ‘open’, ‘unaffected’, ‘for discussion’ or ‘stopped’. 1592 schools are listed in total. 159 are categorised as ‘open’, 547 as ‘unaffected’, 151 as ‘for discussion’ and 735 as ‘stopped’. 4. For simplicity, and because large numbers of pupils cross constituency boundaries to attend school, this list does not provide a breakdown of schools by constituency. 5. There are many examples of Local Authorities in this list having schools in more than one of these categories.
    [Show full text]
  • PRINCIPAL Candidate Information Principal Candidate Information
    PRINCIPAL candidate information Principal candidate information Contents Letter from the Chairman .................................................................................... 3 Welcome from our students ................................................................................. 4 Our community ................................................................................................... 5 Our vision .......................................................................................................... 6 Our mission ........................................................................................................ 6 Our sponsor ....................................................................................................... 7 The Ormiston Academies Trust network ................................................................ 8 Job description .................................................................................................... 9 Person specification ........................................................................................... 11 How to apply .................................................................................................... 13 2 Principal candidate information Letter from the Chairman As the Chairman of Ormiston Academies Trust (OAT), I would like to extend a very warm welcome to you. Thank you for the interest you have shown in the position of Principal at Ormiston Sandwell Community Academy (OSCA). I hope this information pack will be helpful to you and convey
    [Show full text]