1 Mitang, Herbert, Ed. Abraham Lincoln: a Press Portrait. Athens

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Mitang, Herbert, Ed. Abraham Lincoln: a Press Portrait. Athens Mitang, Herbert, ed. Abraham Lincoln: A Press Portrait. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1989. Lincoln letter on candidacy for General Assembly in 1832, 4 1836 election, newspaper letters, 8-11 Celebration of getting the capital in Springfield, toast, volunteers, Long Nine, 11-14 Springfield Junto, newspaper attack on Lincoln and his allies, 1839, 14-15 Lincoln and Douglas, 1839, 16-18 1840 election, 18-20 Conflict in legislature, Whigs breaking quorum, 20-23 Investigation of public printing, 23-25 Canal bonds, 25-26 Lincoln as possible gubernatorial candidate, 26-27 Possible duel with Shields, 28-43 1844 Clay, debate with John Calhoun, 43-45 Whig candidate for Congress, 46-47 Lincoln denies charge of religious skepticism, 50 Harbor and River convention in Chicago, 51 New members of Congress, 52-54 Lincoln and spot resolutions, 54-58 Tribune on Lincoln and debate in House, 59-60 1848 speaking tour of New England, 60-67 Whigs thank Lincoln for congressional service, 67-68 Lincoln writes editorial, speeches, opposing Kansas-Nebraska act, Douglas, 68-75 Lincoln and anti-Nebraska convention, 78 Republican convention, 1856, 78-82 Dred Scott decision, Lincoln reply to Douglas, 82-87 Lincoln for Senate, Lincoln story, 88-89 Republican convention, 89-90 House Divided speech, 90-96 New York Tribune and Lincoln, 96-98 Southern denunciation of Illinois Republicans, 98-100 Lincoln and Douglas, house divided, 100-3 Chicago Tribune on Lincoln’s Mexican War record, 103-4 Lincoln Douglas debates, 104-28 1858, call for Lincoln for president, 130-31 New York Tribune on Lincoln and Douglas after the election, 131-33 Sympathy for Lincoln in Kansas, 134 Pennsylvania and Lincoln, 135 Speaking in Ohio in 1859, 136-43 Connecticut and Lincoln, 144 Illinois editorial on Lincoln for president, 144-45 Pennsylvania, campaign biography of Lincoln, 145-52 Chicago Tribune on importance of Illinois in 1860 campaign, Lincoln popularity, 152-54 Cooper Union Speech, New York Tribune, 154-61 Chicago convention 1860, Chicago Tribune promotion of Lincoln, 164-85 1 Douglas, humor of the campaign, anecdotes, Lincoln’s conscientious honesty, 185-90 Grudging southern respect for Lincoln, 191-92 Poem, 192-93 London press on Lincoln, 193-94 New Orleans press, Lincoln delusions on race, 194-96 John Bell newspaper and Lincoln, 196-97 German voters and Lincoln, 197-98 Lincoln and rail splitting, 198-200 Election day in Springfield, 200-4 Lincoln and disunion, press disputes over election consequences, 204-7 Reaction to Lincoln’s election in New York, 207-211 Missouri, Lincoln, victory, slavery, 211-12 Lincoln receives news of his election, 212-18 Texas reaction to Lincoln election, 219-20 Times of London and Lincoln election, 220-23 Florida and Lincoln, 224 Departure of Lincoln from Springfield, 224-25 Lincoln journey to Washington, 225-32 Charleston Mercury and Lincoln, 232-34 Lincoln inaugural, 236-44 Charleston Mercury, 244-46 Charleston Mercury, Kansas, Indian slaveholders, 246-48 London, Paris, Lincoln and secession, inaugural address, 248-51 Henry J. Raymond, New York Times, need for a policy, 251-55 Lincoln, forts, blockade, attraction to women, 255-56 Maine, opposition to civil war, 256-57 New Orleans, reaction to Lincoln’s call troops, 258-61 Copperhead press on peace at beginning of war, 261-62 Fort Sumter poems, Charleston Mercury, 262-66 Baltimore newspaper attack on Lincoln, 267-68 Baltimore poem on Lincoln message to Congress, 269-71 French commentary on Lincoln message to Congress, 271-73 Lincoln, joke, 273-74 Richmond editor, divorce, 274-75 New York Tribune, Frémont and Lincoln, 275-76 Lincoln first annual message to Congress, New York Tribune, 276-79 Trent Affair, Times of London, 279-82 Seward, Trent affair, Richmond Dispatch, 282-84 Richmond Dispatch, anti-Lincoln poems, 284-87 New York Tribune, Lincoln, slavery, emancipation, 290-93 David Hunter, Lincoln, New York Tribune, 293-97 British, anti-Lincoln description of Lincoln, 297 National Intelligencer, Moderate opinion on slavery, 298-300 Lincoln’s letter to Greeley, 300-302 Emancipation Proclamation, 302-310 Southern press and Emancipation Proclamation, 310-16 2 French and British press on Emancipation Proclamation, 316-23 Ralph Waldo Emerson, Emancipation Proclamation, 323-28 Lincoln annual message to Congress, 1862. 328-30 Final Emancipation Proclamation, British reaction, 330-333 Lincoln the dictator, Confederate opinion, 336-37 Delegation of Indians visit Lincoln, 337-39 British pro-Confederate satire on American military conflict, 339-40 Emancipation, Kansas opinion, Lincoln gunboat poem, 340 Confederate, Lincoln catechism, 342-43 Lincoln as commander in chief, 343-44 Southern Illustrated News, July 4 in Washington, 344-48 London Punch, Lincoln as Brutus, 348-50 Southern Illustrated News, tyrant Lincoln, Emancipation Proclamation, 350-52 Brownlow and Lincoln, 352-53 Wisconsin Republican newspaper defends Lincoln, 354-55 Lincoln at Gettysburg, 355-61 London Times, Gettysburg, Lincoln, Everett, Henry Ward Beecher, 361-64 Lincoln’s third annual message, 364-72 Brownlow, Lincoln, radicals, the war, 372-73 Harriet Beecher Stowe, biographical sketch of Lincoln, 373-78 Copperhead press, dictator Lincoln, 379-81 Greeley and opening of presidential campaign, 381-84 Harper’s Weekly and praise for Lincoln, 384-89 New York Herald, Lincoln, Grant, and the War Department, Halleck, Stanton, 389-91 New York Herald and Lincoln, 391-93 French opinion, Lincoln and Grant, 394 New York Times and a second term for Lincoln, 395-97 Republican convention in Baltimore, Lincoln, Johnson, 400-2 Lincoln at the Philadelphia Sanitary Fair, 403-6 Illinois, weak prospects for Lincoln’s reelection, 406-7 Richmond newspaper, strength of Lincoln in September 1864, Atlanta, 407-9 London Times assessment military situation and election of 1864, 409-11 Richmond Sentinel, Lincoln and the prisoners of war, 411-13 Chicago Tribune, campaign of 1864 and the country’s future, 413-15 Richmond Dispatch on Lincoln’s management and election of 1864, 415-17 Richmond Dispatch on 1864 election results, 417-18 Harpers Weekly and 1864 election results, 419-20 London Times and 1864 election results, 420-22 London Punch, poem on Lincoln’s re-election, 422-23 Joke, Lincoln’s shortest speech, 423 Lincoln fourth annual message, New York Tribune, 423-25 Satire on possible inaugural address, 425-28 London Times on Lincoln’s fourth annual message, 428-30 New York World on Lincoln and peace conference, 430-32 Richmond Sentinel on Lincoln and peace negotiations, 432-434 Lincoln second inaugural, Illinois State Journal, Petersburg Express, 434-38 3 New York Herald on Lincoln’s second term, cabinet and policy, 438-40 Chicago Times on Lincoln’s second inaugural, 440-41 Washington National Intelligencer on Second Inaugural, 441-442 Petersburg Express on Lincoln’s second inaugural address, 442-43 London Times on Lincoln’s second inaugural, 444-45 London Spectator on Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, 446-49 New York Tribune, Horace Greeley advice on peace, 449-51 New York Times, fall of Richmond, 451-52 Boston Journal on Lincoln’s entry into Richmond, Richmond Whig on same subject, 452-55 Lincoln last speech on Reconstruction, New York World, Washington National Intelligencer, 456-59 Springfield Daily State Journal, Lincoln assassination, Illinois State Register, 461-65 Lincoln assassination, New York Herald, New York Tribune, 465-72 New York Times, Lincoln’s second inaugural, assassination, 472-73 Frankfort Commonwealth on Lincoln assassination, 473-75 Richmond Whig, Lincoln assassination, 475-76 Houston Tri-Weekly Telegraph, Lincoln Assassination, 476-79 San Francisco Daily Alta Californian, Lincoln Assassination, 479-81 New York Tribune, Lincoln and Reconstruction, 482-83 London Morning Post, Lincoln assassination, 483-84 London Times assessment of Lincoln, 484-87 London Punch, Lincoln assassination, 487-90 Death of Lincoln, Paris editorials, 49094 Italian editorial on Lincoln, 494-95 Noah Brooks, recollections of Lincoln, 495-508 4 .
Recommended publications
  • The Dispute Over the Annexation of Texas and Opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's Independence, the Nueces River Was R
    American Studies Mr. Carlson The Dispute over the Annexation of Texas and opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's independence, the Nueces River was recognized as the northern boundary of Mexico. Spain had fixed the Nueces as a border in 1816, and the United States ratified it in the 1819 treaty by which the United States had purchased Florida and renounced claims to Texas. Even following Mexico's independence from Spain, American and European cartographers fixed the Texas border at the Nueces. When Texas declared its independence, however, it claimed as its territory an additional 150 miles of land, to the Rio Grande. With the annexation of Texas in 1845, the United States adopted Texas's position and claimed the Rio Grande as the border. Mexico broke diplomatic relations with the United States and refused to recognize either the Texas annexation or the Rio Grande border. President James Polk sent a special envoy, John L. Slidell, to propose cancellation of Mexico's debt to United States citizens who had incurred damages during the Mexican Revolution, provided Mexico would formally recognize the Rio Grande boundary. Slidell was also authorized to offer the Mexican government up to $30 million for California and New Mexico. Between Slidell's arrival on December 6, 1845, and his departure in March 1846, the regime of President Jose Herrara was overthrown and a fervently nationalistic government under General Mariano Paredes seized power. Neither leader would speak to Slidell. When Paredes publicly reaffirmed Mexico's claim to all of Texas, Slidell left in a temper, convinced that Mexico should be "chastised." American Studies Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Image Credits
    the exclusive roster of conferees points to the fact that the honor remains one of the few ways the United States gov- NOTES ernment can acknowledge a foreigner’s contribution to the nation and/or to mankind. The congressional joint resolu- 1. T. Lawrence Larkin, “A ‘Gift’ Strategically tion clearly enumerated Gálvez’s contributions: he led a truly Solicited and Magnanimously Conferred: The multi-national military force to strategically significant American Congress, the French Monarchy, and the victories against Great Britain during the Revolutionary State Portraits of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette,” War; he later served the cause of science as viceroy of New Winterthur Portfolio 44, no. 1 (2010): 31–75; Larkin, Spain by sponsoring hydrographic expeditions of the Gulf “Final Report for Research Undertaken with the Aid of Mexico; his name has been given to several localities in of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society, April–June Texas and Louisiana; and the state of Florida named him a 2000,” Research Files, USCHS. “Great Floridian” in 2012. 2.James Alton James, “Oliver Pollock, Financier of In the spring of 2014, Representative Jeff Miller (FL) the Revolution in the West,” Mississippi Valley His- introduced H.J. Res. 105 in the House, and Senator Marco torical Review, 16, no. 1(June 1929): 67–80; Robert Rubio (FL) introduced S.J. Res. 38 in the Senate, to confer Morris to Bernardo de Gálvez, 21 Nov. 1781, in honorary United States citizenship on Gálvez. As president E. James Ferguson and John Catanzariti, eds., The general of the Sons of the American Revolution, I wrote a Papers of Robert Morris, 1781-1784 (9 vols., Pitts- letter to every member of the House Foreign Affairs Com- burgh, PA, 1980–99), 2:221–22.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln and Emancipation: a Man's Dialogue with His Times
    DOCUMRNT flitSUP48 ED 032 336 24 TE 499 934 By -Minear, Lawrence Lincoln and Emancipation: A Man's Dialogue with His Times. Teacher and Student Manuals. Amherst Coll., Mass. Spons Agency-Office of Education (DREW). Washington. D.C. Bureau of Research. Report No -CRP -H 1 68 Bureau No-BR-S-1071 Pub Date 66 Contract -OEC 5-10-158 Note-137p. EDRS Price MF-$0.75 HC Not Available from EDRS. Descriptors -*Civil War (United States),*Curriculum Guides, Democracy, Government Role, *Leadership Qualities, Leadership Styles, Political Influences, Political Issues, Political Power, Role Conflict, Secondary Education, Self Concept. *Slavery. *Social Studies. United States History Identifiers -*Abraham Lincoln. Emancipation Proclamation Focusing on Abraham Lincoln and the emancipation of the Negro, this social studies unit explores the relationships among men and events, the qualities of leadership. and the nature of historical change. Lincoln's evolving views of the Negro are examined through (1) the historical context in which Lincoln's beliefs about Negroes took shape, (2) the developments in Lincoln's political life, from 1832 through 1861, which affected his beliefs about Negroes, (3) the various military, political.. and diplomatic pressures exerted on Lincoln as President which made him either the captive or master of events, (4) the two Emancipation Proclamations and the relationship between principle and expediency, (5) the impact of the emancipation on Lincoln's understanding of the conduct and purposes of the war and the conditions of peace, and (6) Lincoln's views on reconstruction in relation to emancipation, Inlcuded are suggestions for further reading, maps. charts. and writings from the period which elucidate Lincoln's political milieu.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln Studies at the Bicentennial: a Round Table
    Lincoln Studies at the Bicentennial: A Round Table Lincoln Theme 2.0 Matthew Pinsker Early during the 1989 spring semester at Harvard University, members of Professor Da- vid Herbert Donald’s graduate seminar on Abraham Lincoln received diskettes that of- fered a glimpse of their future as historians. The 3.5 inch floppy disks with neatly typed labels held about a dozen word-processing files representing the whole of Don E. Feh- renbacher’s Abraham Lincoln: A Documentary Portrait through His Speeches and Writings (1964). Donald had asked his secretary, Laura Nakatsuka, to enter this well-known col- lection of Lincoln writings into a computer and make copies for his students. He also showed off a database containing thousands of digital note cards that he and his research assistants had developed in preparation for his forthcoming biography of Lincoln.1 There were certainly bigger revolutions that year. The Berlin Wall fell. A motley coalition of Afghan tribes, international jihadists, and Central Intelligence Agency (cia) operatives drove the Soviets out of Afghanistan. Virginia voters chose the nation’s first elected black governor, and within a few more months, the Harvard Law Review selected a popular student named Barack Obama as its first African American president. Yet Donald’s ven- ture into digital history marked a notable shift. The nearly seventy-year-old Mississippi native was about to become the first major Lincoln biographer to add full-text searching and database management to his research arsenal. More than fifty years earlier, the revisionist historian James G. Randall had posed a question that helps explain why one of his favorite graduate students would later show such a surprising interest in digital technology as an aging Harvard professor.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenberg – a Wicked
    POLK, CLAY, LINCOLN, AND THE 1846 U.S. INVASION OF MEXICO WICKED WAR AMY S. GREENBERG I do not think there was ever a more wicked war than that waged by the United States on Mexico. I thought so at the time, when I was a youngster, only I had not moral courage enough to resign. —ULYSSES S. GRANT, 1879 Introduction THIS is THE STORY of five men, four years, and one foreign war. Henry Clay, James K. Polk, Abraham Lincoln, John J. Hardin, and Nicholas Trist were bound together in unexpected political and personal battle during the years 1844-48 as AmericaVwar against Mexico unfolded, then stumbled to an end. That conflict, which breached George Washington's injunction to avoid entanglements abroad, was an act of expansionist aggression against a neighboring country. It reshaped the United States into lord of the continent and announced the arrival of a new world power. TheJJ.S.-Mexican conflict also tipped an internecine struggle over slaveryjnto civil war. Though both Its justification and its consequences are dim now, this, America's first wgr against another republic, decisively broke with the past, shaped the future, and to this day affects how the United States acts in the world. This is also a story about politics, slavery, Manifest Destiny, Indian kill- ing, and what it meant to prove one's manhood in the nineteenth century. It explores the meaning of moral courage injVmerica, the importance of legacies passed between generations, and the imperatives that turn politi- cians into leaders. And it attempts to explain why the United States invaded a neighboring country and how it came to pass that a substantial number of Americans determined to stop the ensuing war.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Lincoln: Preserving the Union and the Constitution
    ABRAHAM LINCOLN: PRESERVING THE UNION AND THE CONSTITUTION Louis Fisher* I. THE MEXICAN WAR ..................................................................505 A. Polk Charges Treason ...................................................507 B. The Spot Resolutions ....................................................508 C. Scope of Presidential Power .........................................510 II. DRED SCOTT DECISION ...........................................................512 III. THE CIVIL WAR .....................................................................513 A. The Inaugural Address.................................................515 B. Resupplying Fort Sumter .............................................518 C. War Begins ...................................................................520 D. Lincoln’s Message to Congress .....................................521 E. Constitutionality of Lincoln’s Actions .......................... 523 F. Suspending the Writ .....................................................524 G. Statutory Endorsement ................................................527 H. Lincoln’s Blockade .......................................................528 IV. COMPARING POLK AND LINCOLN ...........................................531 * Specialist in constitutional law, Law Library, Library of Congress. This paper was presented at the Albany Government Law Review’s symposium, “Lincoln’s Legacy: Enduring Lessons of Executive Power,” held on September 30 and October 1, 2009. My appreciation to David Gray Adler, Richard
    [Show full text]
  • CONSUMING LINCOLN: ABRAHAM LINCOLN's WESTERN MANHOOD in the URBAN NORTHEAST, 1848-1861 a Dissertation Submitted to the Kent S
    CONSUMING LINCOLN: ABRAHAM LINCOLN’S WESTERN MANHOOD IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1848-1861 A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By David Demaree August 2018 © Copyright All right reserved Except for previously published materials A dissertation written by David Demaree B.A., Geneva College, 2008 M.A., Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2012 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by ____________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Kevin Adams, Ph.D. ____________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Elaine Frantz, Ph.D. ____________________________, Lesley J. Gordon, Ph.D. ____________________________, Sara Hume, Ph.D. ____________________________ Robert W. Trogdon, Ph.D. Accepted by ____________________________, Chair, Department of History Brian M. Hayashi, Ph.D. ____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences James L. Blank, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 02 003-020 OGURA(責)山.Indd
    The Japanese Journal of American Studies, No. 31 (2020) Copyright © 2020 Izumi Ogura. All rights reserved. This work may be used, with this notice included, for noncommercial purposes. No copies of this work may be distributed, electronically or otherwise, in whole or in part, without permission from the author. The Concord Community: Ralph Waldo Emerson and the Antislavery Movement Izumi OGURA* INTRODUCTION Traditional scholarship on Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–82) tends to focus on his representative works from the 1830s, such as Nature (1836), “The American Scholar” (1837), and “The Divinity School Address” (1838).1 Many scholars contend that as Emerson emphasized the “self- supplied powers of the individual,”2 he did not make explicit statements opposing slavery.3 George M. Fredrickson writes in The Inner Civil War (1965) that Emerson’s “detachment” and seclusion led him to remain aloof from society and politics and that it was not until the outbreak of the Civil War that he became “an infl uential and active citizen.”4 He says that Emerson’s egoistic self-reliance transformed him into a “useful citizen” as he got involved in the slavery argument and the Civil War.5 For Emerson, the question of slavery was the turning point in his acceptance of “collective feeling as the equivalent of individual intuition.”6 In Virtue’s Hero (1990), Len Gougeon leads the way in revising past negative interpretations of Emerson’s attitude toward society. Still, in his 2012 article “Militant Abolitionism,” he states that even in the twenty-fi rst century,
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln's Cooper Union Speech Background
    Background for Lincoln’s Cooper Union Address The Issue of Slavery in the Territories As the United States expanded in the first half of the 19th century and new states entered the Union, the status of slavery in the new territories and in the newly admitted states became the central issue of political debate. The formulation of the legislative branch in the US Constitution was designed specifically to protect the states from being out voted by the more populous northern free states. While seats in the House of Representatives are based on population, each state has two seats in the United States Senate. Consequently, as long as the number of slave states roughly equaled the number of free states, it would be impossible for the free states to have the necessary votes to ban slavery in all the new territories. Moreover, the Constitution requires two-thirds of each house to propose any amendment to the Constitution and two-thirds of all the states to ratify. Consequently, as long as one-third of the states were slave states, it would be impossible to pass a amendment to the Constitution abolishing slavery. The United States expanded substantially, first by the Louisiana Purchase and then by the acquisition of California and what is now the southwestern United States in the Mexican- American War 1846-48. Most opponents of slavery opposed the Mexican-American War because they saw it as a war that would expand the number of slave states. During this period a number of compromises were made to admit states while placating Southern fears of a growing number of free states.
    [Show full text]
  • History 316: the Era of the American Civil War Fall 2017: MW 4:10-5:25
    History 316: The Era of the American Professor Michael McManus Civil War Office: 401 Linfield Hall Fall 2017: MW 4:10-5:25 Office hours: Wednesday, 2:30-4:00 or Roberts Hall 210 by appointment Email: [email protected] History 316 is an upper-level undergraduate course exploring the history of the United States during the years of the sectional crisis, the Civil War, and Reconstruction. We will explore the causes, course, and consequences of the Civil War and attempt to understand the multiple meanings of this transforming event in American history. We will examine in particular the political impact of the slavery issue in bringing on secession and war, the soldiers experience, emancipation and Reconstruction. Lectures are central to the course and you are required to attend them all, to be on time, to pay careful attention, to take detailed notes, and to remain present until they have concluded. In addition, you are to complete all reading assignments and make a determined effort to understand the topics covered and the author’s interpretation of events. You are strongly encouraged to engage actively with the readings, take careful notes, and prepare an outline of the assignment. Electronic devices can be intensely distracting to your fellow students and teacher. For this reason, cellphones must be turned off completely once you enter the classroom. Classroom use of laptops, tablets, and other electronic devices is deeply discouraged, taking notes by hand is strongly encouraged. LEARNING OBJECTIVES To understand the evolution of slavery
    [Show full text]
  • The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln
    REVIEWS THm COLLECTED WORKS OF ABRAHAm LiNcoLN. Roy P. Basler, ed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1953. 9 vols. $115.00. THIs stupendous work is the definitive collection of Lincoln papers. It is superbly edited and handsomely published. It has been widely reviewed, and has already become a commercial success, fully vindicating the daring of the press which published it and the patience of the editors who created it. A review of any collected works of this kind is likely to develop into a catalog of treasures. The treasures are here. Each volume necessarily contains much minutia of no great significance, but the deep-seated Lincoln enthusiast will want to know about everlthing, and the casual browser will find a good deal to interest him which is not in the shorter collections. Though the Works omit most of the exclusively legal writings by Lincoln, as for example his pleadings, what is here can be seen by a law:yer with the eye of a fellow craftsman, which makes it look a little different than it does to others. If Lincoln is read with a professional eye, any lawyer can learn from his reading. I Abraham Lincoln was President of the United States from 1861 to 1865. He romanced with Ann Rutledge (if he did at all) for only a few months. He pulled a puppy out of a river, rescued a pig, went down the Mississippi on a flatboat, and ran a store, unsuccessfully, for a year. He gave the Gettys- burg Address in something under five minutes, asked a particularly probing question of Stephen A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Eight “A Strong but Judicious Enemy to Slavery”: Congressman Lincoln (1847-1849) Lincoln's Entire Public Service O
    Chapter Eight “A Strong but Judicious Enemy to Slavery”: Congressman Lincoln (1847-1849) Lincoln’s entire public service on the national level before his election as president was a single term in the U. S. House. Though he had little chance to distinguish himself there, his experience proved a useful education in dealing with Congress and patronage. WASHINGTON, D.C. Arriving in Washington on December 2, 1847, the Lincolns found themselves in a “dark, narrow, unsightly” train depot, a building “literally buried in and surrounded with mud and filth of the most offensive kind.”1 A British traveler said he could scarcely imagine a “more miserable station.”2 Emerging from this “mere shed, of slight construction, designed for temporary use” which was considered “a disgrace” to the railroad company as well as “the city that tolerates it,”3 they beheld an “an ill-contrived, 1 Saturday Evening News (Washington), 14 August 1847. 2 Alexander MacKay, The Western World, or, Travels in the United States in 1846-47 (3 vols.; London: Richard Bentley, 1850), 1:162. 3 Letter by “Mercer,” n.d., Washington National Intelligencer, 16 November 1846. The author of this letter thought that the station was “in every respect bad: it is cramped in space, unsightly in appearance, inconvenient in its position, and ill adapted to minister to the comfort of travellers in the entire character of its arrangements.” Cf. Wilhelmus Bogart Bryan, A History of the National Capital from Its Foundation through the Period of the Adoption of the Organic Act (2 vols.; New York: Macmillan, 1914-16), 2:357.
    [Show full text]