Nuzr 1 9 6 4 0 5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Vol. 3. - ~, 1- ,'1 I n -IS - Vol. 3. - ~, 1- ,'1 I n -IS IZIMBABWE EDITORIAL "IS irO.O STILL TIERE"? o..e...e.o............... The recent announcement by the blood-thirsty colonial regine of Smith, that no one is allowed to visit the place where our leader Mr. Nkono is restricted, leaves us in a Lgloon of doubt for his personal safity more especially that the place is so rerote and greatly lion-infested. In the pubs and beerhalls, in the schools and in the streets around the teeming townships of Salisbury, Gatbona, Quo Quo, Gwelo, Fort Victoria, Gwanda Untali and Dulawayo, and in all rural areas and reserves, the rasses' patience is greatly exhausted, and every talk is centred on Mr. Hkono's safety. The "no-visitors" announcenent by the bonny-haad and pendulous-nosed Dupont and his murderous progeny is causing disesteen and !increasing suspicion as to why the people's leader, Joshua !Tkono should be kept hidden by the settlers regime of Smith. What heightens the fears witpii. the ,aseo, s the recent Rhodesian Front Govern:lentts statement that the restriction area is not fenced, and that lkomo lives apart from the other restrictees. The area is near the Portuguese border, lions and elephants are known to roan in the neighbouring bush. Hoif one poses a question: "Is our leader still there?" We therefore roVehl it to the world that the settlers in S. Rhodesia ant Mr. 11komo to suffer the fate of the late Patrice Lununba of the Congo# i)y nsfusing permission to anyone who wants to go and see him there, to clear this gloom of uncertainty in the ninds of the masses in Zimbabwe. As we arc writing, no one knows whether our leader is still alife. We therefore ask the settlers in S. Rhodesia the following questions:a) What crime has been coritted by our leader which makes it impossible for us, his followers to meet him? t) If the people sentenced to death can be seen before they are executed, why should we be barred from meeting our leader, whom we know is in restriction and not in prison? Cont.,...,. Cont,...o C) Under what conditions is he being kept and who is cookino for him? d) What food is he beinr7 Civen? e) Why should he be kept away fron others? After askin, all these questions, and after failing to got the correct answer frot the blood-thirsty regire of Dupont and his murderous clique, we are bound to take it that the settlers have done something to our leader. During the past years of political struggle in Central Africa, we have lost the greatest political heroes like, the beloved Dr. Parirenyatwa, Dunduzu Chisiza and many others. Are we then roino to lose I'kono? Whatever happens to Nkono or any of our leaders who are in restriction, Britain will.,'esponsible, because she has willingly exposed the lives of African nationalists to the Charity of her minority kith and kin. We must inform the world of this crucial morent that if anything happens to I.Tkormo while in restriction, we, the people of Zimbabwe, shall destroy if not aliminate any white settler pest in any possible way, even if it means involving the entire world into a third world war. We shall never listen to any explanation that cones after something has h6ppened to i1r. Ikono. Why are reporters, nenbers of the red-cross not allowed to Go and see him if the settler authorAs argue that he is safe? It is now up to the world to digest the seriousness of the matter and any step taken by Zimbabweans to defend thenselves from the sharp teeth of settlerdom and capitalism. Bloodshed is just off the corner in Zimbabwe and unless we know the safety of our leader Ilkomo, we shall all perish in defence of our rights. SUD-EDITORIAL COMMONWEALTH CONFERENCE. The powder-magazine on which the settlers in S. Rhodesia wore sitting has exploded. They have in their insanity to lie, but with no succes even in London, a place that could accomodate their ancestors some years ago. Recent events have further proved that Zimbabwe (S.R.) is a human butchery, c6vered with prisoners and gallows. Dondoft:- Sir Alec has been requested by the settlers, through their captain of maniacs Smith to invite him to a conference of Commonwealth heads of States (Prime Ministers). Smith has categorically demanded it "as a right." Home on the contrary, stated that S. Rhodesia could be invited as a "courtesy." In this respect, Britain has thus admitted in no ambiguous terms, that S. Rhodesia is not independent against its fallacious and immoral argument at the U.N, that she cannot interfere into the internal affairs of S. Rhodesia. There is thus a clash of ideas with very serious repercussions for the already strife-torn country S. Rodesia o Cont,..... Cont.... If Britain stands by the right; then the Smith squad may declare their diablically planned minority independence aGainst the will of the majority, sooner than envisaged. Britain is now faced with an open crisis. On the other hand, if Britain must succumb to this settler intimidation; then we expect our brothers in the Commonwealth not to find themselves in this net of constitutional black mail. We fail to see how the Pan-Africanist representatives can sit with a man of the dominating settler and murderous regime. We refuse to be convinced >y our Asian friends for this act, and yet at the recent Afro-Asian Conference in Algiers; they agreed to severe all relationships and dealings with these *resont wicked masters of banishments led by Smith. We still fail to see how some other Commonwealth countries who boast of democracy in their own coutries can invite an undemocratic representative at a conference of democratically elected heads under 'One man, One vote.' In the name of sanity and humanity, they (the commonwealth countries) threw away Verwoerd, why replace him with another devil-Smith? DEMAND:- To us, we foresee Zimbabwe flowinS with the blood of the patriots as long as Britain is going to be courteous to the minority call instead of a majority right. This is no time, place nor a chance to dream of courtesy but to find a solution acceptable to the majority of the population in Zimbbwe# Let the world be left with no delusion about our position. We demand that Britain (the creator and origin.ator of this plunder) mkke good her mess-by calling for an immediate constitutional conference now, Where the people's leader Hr. Nkomo shall demand the restoration of Zimbabwe back to the legitimate owners. Men with the sagacity know that it is not a cry for the moon which we, the African masses are making, buY a God-given right which we promise him to fulfU, what ever the circumstances and Sonsequences. Therefore, we think that our African brothers in the Commonwealth, will not betray us, by agreeing to sit at the same table with Smith, who is oppressing and mercilessly killing the defenceless masses in Zimbabwe. The presence of Smith at the Commonwealth Prime Ministers' conference to be held in London, will be a defeat on the part of Britain by the settlers, and it will be a direct admittance by the British Government that she is determined more than ever to protect her kith and kin in Zimbabwe, at the expense of the African masses. Southern Rhodesia is a non-independent colony controlled directly from Britain, therefore this wild talk of S. Rhodesia being internally selfgoverning is completely nul and Void. We challenge Britain to use her power and suspend the present white-manto- whiteman constitution, which the masses have rejected enbloc. Whatdoes Britain say? (1) P.C.C. DRAiiCIi ASKS FOR A COISTITUTIT'I COiFEREIICE In a memorandum to the Dritish Government, the University College of Rhodesia and HIyasaland P.C.C. branch ashod for an im:ediate constitutional conference to be attended by all the representatives of the people of Zimbabwe* The memorandum said Dritaih's reluctance to exercise her legal powers over SR. had resulted in the present economic stagnation mounting to unemployment and erosion of the 'Rule of Law'. In drawing attention to the deteriorating situation in the country, the memorandum signed by the branch chairman 1ir. Herbert T . Musikavanhut says the "failure of Field's premiership provides conclusive evidence of the explosiveness of the situation." The memorandum went on to say that the 1961 Whitehead-Sandys constitution, rejected in tot6 bir 4,O0,O'Atrilcans rmust be suspended forthwith and immediately replaced by a constitution accepta7.le to the majority of the populationi COIIIEUT: We, the people of Zimbabwe, warn Dritain and the settlers in S.R. that our forces are narching forward and no r.inority cliques shall halt our determination to rule Zimbabwe under the leadership if komo aid all his lieutenants.' Ve are very much aware that the present mass arrests of the P.C.C. supporters, the detentions and restrictions, and other diabolic tactic$ now being used by the set tler regine df the Oejected Smith, are preliminary -steps towardIs a unilateral declaration of independence. Therefore we warn him before it is too late that any such irrespohsible steps will be met with the amount of force they deserve by the African masses. SETTLER COSTAS DISCIPLIUED DY AFRICATS- SALISDURY. ......... .............................. see In a European suburb of Avondale, Salisbury, a certain European cafe owner, Costas CalocgTipies, was disciplined by four African customers who wanted to be served with chocolates and fresh milk. This nan Costas, using the Vorster entality called these four gentleman 'Kaffirs' and went on to say that he was not prepared to serve the kaffirs in his cafe.
Recommended publications
  • A Biographical Study of Bishop Ralph Edward Dodge 1907 – 2008

    A Biographical Study of Bishop Ralph Edward Dodge 1907 – 2008

    ABSTRACT Toward a New Church in a New Africa: A Biographical Study of Bishop Ralph Edward Dodge 1907 – 2008 This biography of a Methodist Bishop, Ralph Edward Dodge is an extensive look into how, as a missionary, mission board executive, and bishop, Dodge applied principles of indigenization he embraced as a young man preparing for missionary work to the complexities of ministry in Southern Africa when empires were withdrawing and new nations were forming. Written by an African, the dissertation examines Dodge’s impact upon the several countries in which he was involved as a churchman ‒ countries that would soon move from imperial subjugation to independence. Ralph Edward Dodge (1907–2008) was an American missionary and Bishop of the Methodist Church and United Methodist Church. He was born in Iowa and went to Africa in 1936 at age 29. He began his missionary career in the Portuguese colony of Angola. Except for four years during World War II, he would serve there until 1950. During the war, he continued his postgraduate work, obtaining two more degrees, including a PhD. Afterwards, Dodge and his family returned to Africa. In 1950, he was asked to serve as Executive Secretary for Africa and Europe at the Methodist Church’s Board of Missions in New York. Six years later, the Reverend Doctor Dodge would return to Africa as Bishop Dodge, the first Methodist Bishop elected by the Africa Central Conference, and the only American. His Episcopal Area included the colonial territories of Angola, Mozambique, and Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe). When his twelve-year term was ended, he was elected “Bishop for Life.” Bishop Dodge remained in Africa until his “retirement” in 1968.
  • Race, Identity, and Belonging in Early Zimbabwean Nationalism(S), 1957-1965

    Race, Identity, and Belonging in Early Zimbabwean Nationalism(S), 1957-1965

    Race, Identity, and Belonging in Early Zimbabwean Nationalism(s), 1957-1965 Joshua Pritchard This thesis interrogates traditional understandings of race within Zimbabwean nationalism. It explores the interactions between socio-cultural identities and belonging in black African nationalist thinking and politics, and focuses on the formative decade between the emergence of mass African nationalist political parties in 1957 and the widespread adoption of an anti- white violent struggle in 1966. It reassesses the place of non-black individuals within African anti-settler movements. Using the chronological narrative provided by the experiences of marginal non-black supporters (including white, Asian, coloured, and Indian individuals), it argues that anti-colonial nationalist organisations during the pre-Liberation War period were heavily influenced by the competing racial theories and politics espoused by their elite leadership. It further argues that the imagined future Zimbabwean nations had a fluid and reflexive positioning of citizens based on racial identities that changed continuously. Finally, this thesis examines the construction of racial identities through the discourse used by black Zimbabweans and non-black migrants and citizens, and the relationships between these groups, to contend that race was an inexorable factor in determining belonging. Drawing upon archival sources created by non-black 'radical' participants and Zimbabwean nationalists, and oral interviews conducted during fieldwork in South Africa and Zimbabwe in 2015, the research is a revisionist approach to existing academic literature on Zimbabwean nationalism: in the words of Terence Ranger, it is not a nationalist history but a history of nationalism. It situates itself within multiple bodies of study, including conceptual nationalist and racial theory, the histories of marginal groups within African nationalist movements, and studies of citizenship and belonging.
  • Peasants and Nationalism in the Development of Land Ownership Structure in Zimbabwe from Pre-Colonialism to the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) Period

    Peasants and Nationalism in the Development of Land Ownership Structure in Zimbabwe from Pre-Colonialism to the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) Period

    LAND TO THE PEOPLE: Peasants and nationalism in the development of land ownership structure in Zimbabwe from pre-colonialism to the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) period. Bridget M. Mupfuvi Salford Business School University of Salford, Greater Manchester United Kingdom Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, March 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER ONE ..................................................................................................................... 10 THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING: INTRODUCING THE STUDY ......................... 10 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Key Research Questions ................................................................................................. 16 1.3 Significance of the study ................................................................................................ 19 1.4 Historical Significance of the Study ............................................................................... 20 1.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 25 1.7 Chapter Outline .............................................................................................................. 26 CHAPTER TWO ...................................................................................................................
  • Rhodesia to Zimbabwe a Chronology 1830 to 1976

    Rhodesia to Zimbabwe a Chronology 1830 to 1976

    Rhodesia To Zimbabwe A Chronology 1830 to 1976 by George M. Houser THE AFRICA FUND (Associated with The American Committee on Africa) 305 E. 46th St. * New York, N.Y. 10017 9 Telephone (212) 838-5030 16-~ 16 0N55 7 MASHONALAND NORTH ~ lae KaS / Namibia ~oo 10 T . .. .0 , o ledell ELsv' MASHONALAND OUTH * MILANDS O~on MATABELELANDNORTH *Redd:LU ANClANU.-*-Kt BOTSWANAFotVcri Rs~o~oyo*/ ~For, V'cto,, '..2 Shobon, LKele 1 VICTORI MATABELELAND SOUTH > MOZAMBIQUE SOUTH AFRICA 28 3 Note Provrnces -.- hove no posthon n requlor strvctvre of governmnft Zimbabwe FROM RHODESIA TO ZIMBABWE A conflict of major proportions is now coming to a head in southern Africa, as Africans struggling for a free Zimbabwe confront a white minority government whose sole aim is to protect the political power and economic privilege of the tiny Rhodesian settler population. The white minority numbers less than 280,000 in a population of over 6 million, but it is a minority determined to maintain its power and privilege as long as possible. History, for the white minority, begins with the aggressive expansionism of Cecil Rhodes. His central role in the work of British colonial occupation at the end of the 19th century is reflected in the naming of both Northern Rhodesia (now independent Zambia) and Southern Rhodesia in his honor. The attitude of most white settlers toward African history prior to white occupation is accurately summed up by the white Rhodesian who told a New York Times reporter: "The African has no past, very little present without white or yellow help, and no future of his own." Rhodesian settlers use this argument to justify the history of white minority rule, to explain the present repression of Africans and to project continued white rule into the future.
  • Competing Nationalist Narratives and the Zimbabwe African People’S Union, 1961-1980

    Competing Nationalist Narratives and the Zimbabwe African People’S Union, 1961-1980

    “Yesterday it was One Man One Vote, Today it is One Man One Gun:” Competing Nationalist Narratives and the Zimbabwe African People’s Union, 1961-1980 by Nicholas Baker Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia June 2018 © Copyright by Nicholas Baker, 2018 Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………….iii Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………………….iv Chapter One: Introduction…………………………………………………………………....1 African Nationalism and Resistance in Zimbabwe……………………………………3 The Historiography of ZANU and ZAPU in Zimbabwe……………………………..10 Project Parameters and Methodology………………………………………………..14 Chapter Two: The Initial Stages of African Nationalism in Southern Rhodesia…………...20 Population Change and Government Responses……………………………………..22 Resuscitating the ANC and the Creation of the CYL………………………………..27 Laying the Foundations of ZAPU……………………………………………………36 State in Emergency: The End of the SRANC and the Start of the NDP……………..52 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………58 Chapter Three: ZAPU’s Early Years and the African Nationalist Fracture………………..61 Joining the Party: The Brief Legal Existence of ZAPU……………………………..62 The ZANU-ZAPU Split……………………………………………………………...77 The Impact of the Split on ZAPU……………………………………………………96 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….104 Chapter Four: ZAPU in the Struggle: Confronting the Regime and Internal Dissent….....107 Building a Military………………………………………………………………….109 Confronting UDI……………………………………………………………………123 The ZAPU-ANC
  • Jacob Chikuhwa a Crisis of Go

    Jacob Chikuhwa a Crisis of Go

    A CRISIS OF GOVERNANCE: ZIMBABWE A CRISIS OF GOVERNANCE: ZIMBABWE Jacob Chikuhwa Algora Publishing New York © 2004 by Algora Publishing. All Rights Reserved www.algora.com No portion of this book (beyond what is permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the United States Copyright Act of 1976) may be reproduced by any process, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the express written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 0-87586-284-5 (softcover) ISBN: 0-87586-285-3 (hardcover) ISBN: 0-87586-286-1 (ebook) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chikuhwa, Jacob W. (Jacob Wilson), 1940- A crisis of governance : Zimbabwe / Jacob Chikuhwa. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-87586-284-5 (trade paper : alk. paper) — ISBN 0-87586-285-3 (hard cover : alk. paper) — ISBN 0-87586-286-1 1. Zimbabwe—Politics and government—1980- I. Title. JQ2925.C47 2004 320.96891—dc22 2004006344 Printed in the United States This book is dedicated to all the people who were tortured and those who died for the liberation and for the democratic process underway in Zimbabwe. I also dedicate the book to those who are campaigning to make Zimbabwe a truly democratic society. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my wife Raisa, my son Tonderai-Wilson and his wife Assiati and my daughter Eleonora-Ngwarai, and all my friends and acquaintances who have directly or indirectly made the task of writing this book more easy, bearable and even pleasurable. These include pastors Doug and Jodi Fondell, who provided me with material and moral support when I had just returned to Sweden at the end of April 2002.
  • Reconstructing the Implications of Liberation Struggle History on SADC Mediation in Zimbabwe

    Reconstructing the Implications of Liberation Struggle History on SADC Mediation in Zimbabwe

    OCCASIONAL PAPER NO 92 South African Foreign Policy and African Drivers Programme September 2011 Reconstructing the Implications of Liberation Struggle History on SADC Mediation in Zimbabwe Sabelo J Ndlovu-Gatsheni s ir a f f A l a n o ti a rn e nt f I o te tu sti n In rica . th Af hts Sou sig al in Glob African perspectives. About SAIIA The South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) has a long and proud record as South Africa’s premier research institute on international issues. It is an independent, non-government think-tank whose key strategic objectives are to make effective input into public policy, and to encourage wider and more informed debate on international affairs with particular emphasis on African issues and concerns. It is both a centre for research excellence and a home for stimulating public engagement. SAIIA’s occasional papers present topical, incisive analyses, offering a variety of perspectives on key policy issues in Africa and beyond. Core public policy research themes covered by SAIIA include good governance and democracy; economic policymaking; international security and peace; and new global challenges such as food security, global governance reform and the environment. Please consult our website www.saiia.org.za for further information about SAIIA’s work. A b o u t t h e S o u t h A f r I c A n f o r e I g n p o l I c y A n d A f r I c A n d r I v e r S p r o g r A m m e Since the fall of Apartheid in 1994, South Africa’s foreign policy has prioritised the development of Africa.
  • DRAFT – Please Do Not Quote Or Cite Without Author's Permission. Dr Zoë

    DRAFT – Please Do Not Quote Or Cite Without Author's Permission. Dr Zoë

    DRAFT – Please do not quote or cite without author’s permission. Dr Zoë R Groves Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Humanities, Wit Institute for Social and Economic Research (WISER), University of the Witwatersrand Email: [email protected] Transnational Migration and Pan-African Solidarity: the case of the Central African Federation, 1953-19631 Abstract The Federation of Northern and Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland was declared in 1953, linking the three territories of central Africa politically and economically. The decision went against the wishes of the African majority, particularly in Nyasaland and Northern Rhodesia, where Federation was viewed as an opportunity to extend white settler domination north of the Zambezi. The territories had a history of close association prior to 1953, connected by flows of migrant labour to the urban and industrial economies of the south. Anti-federation sentiment served to unite African political interests in central Africa in the 1950s, bringing about a moment of Pan-African solidarity between the African Congress parties that has remained largely unexplored by historians. This paper inquires into transnational political networks and highlights the influence of ‘northern’ nationalists on African politics during the Federation period. This study complicates the nationalist histories of central Africa and contributes to research on Pan-Africanism, African diasporas, and the impact of cross border mobility on central African politics. Introduction The central and southern African region has a rich
  • Whites in Zimbabwe and Rhodesia: Hapana Mutsauko Here

    Whites in Zimbabwe and Rhodesia: Hapana Mutsauko Here

    Southeastern Regional Seminar in African Studies (SERSAS) Fall Meeting 27-28 October 20 00 University of Tennessee, Kn oxville Tennessee, USA Whites in Zimbabwe and Rhodesia: Hapana Mutsauko Here. Is it the same difference? David Leaver Raymond Walters C ollege University of Cincinnati Quote with Permission from [email protected] Copyright © 2001 by David Leaver All Rights Reserved There is no intention on our part to use our majority to victimize the minority. We will ensure there is a place for everyone in this country. We want to ensure a sense of security for both winners and losers. (Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe's new Prime Minister, election night 1980) If the new millennium, like the last . remains the age of the master race, of the master economy and the master state, then I am afraid we in developing countries will have to stand up and say: "Not again". (Robert Mugabe, July 2000 Millennium summit).[1] In an effort to incite popular support once enjoyed after Zimbabwe's liberation struggle (1962-1980), President Robert Mugabe, as victor over white supremacy, today denounces his country's tiny white minority for racial privilege and supposed alien loyalties.[2] Until the mid-1990s, while he pursued national reconciliation after bloody civil war, Mugabe enjoyed respect abroad and popular support at home. Then at the polls his Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) was twice rejected, especially by urban 'born frees', younger voters lacking experience of the liberation struggle. Rejection came as a 'no' vote in a February 2000 constitutional referendum to approve uncompensated confiscation of white commercial farms.
  • War Veterans in Zimbabwe's Land Occupations

    War Veterans in Zimbabwe's Land Occupations

    WAR VETERANS IN ZIMBABWE ’S LAND OCCUPATIONS : COMPLEXITIES OF A LIBERATION MOVEMENT IN AN AFRICAN POST -COLONIAL SETTLER SOCIETY Wilbert Zvakanyorwa Sadomba Promotor: Prof. dr. P. Richards Hoogleraar Technologie en Agrarische Ontwikkeling Wageningen Universiteit Co-Promotoren: Prof. dr. S. Moyo Director African Institute of Agrarian Studies Dr. ir. K. Jansen Universitair docent, leerstoelgroep Technologie en Agrarische Ontwikkeling Wageningen Universiteit Leescommissie: Prof. dr. ir. D.J.M. Hilhorst Wageningen Universiteit Prof dr. ir. C. Leeuwis Wageningen Universiteit Prof. dr. I. Scoones Institute of Development Studies University of Sussex, United Kingdom Dr. ir. P. de Vries Wageningen Universiteit Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool: CERES –Research School for Resource Studies for Development WAR VETERANS IN ZIMBABWE ’S LAND OCCUPATIONS : COMPLEXITIES OF A LIBERATION MOVEMENT IN AN AFRICAN POST -COLONIAL SETTLER SOCIETY Wilbert Zvakanyorwa Sadomba Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. Dr. M.J. Kropff, In het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 17 juni 2008 des namiddags te half 2 in de Aula Sadomba, Wilbert Zvakanyorwa (2008) War Veterans in Zimbabwe’s Land Occupations: Complexities of a liberation movement in an African post-colonial settler society Keywords: Post-colonial settlerism, liberation, land, war veterans, politics, agrarian change ISBN: 978-90-8504-917-3 Dedication To my two daughters Tamirirana and Agnes Tapurai: That as mothers remember, will you, The spirit of struggle passed over, ever; That your fecund powers of shall beget, Resistance of Africa’s marginal poor, Yearning still, seeking but in vain, The content of their liberation, Shuttered, destroyed by; top heavy-weights the filthy, rich, few.
  • The ZAPU and ZANU Guerrilla Warfare and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Zimbabwe

    The ZAPU and ZANU Guerrilla Warfare and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Zimbabwe

    The ZAPU and ZANU guerrilla warfare and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Zimbabwe http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.crp3b10012 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org The ZAPU and ZANU guerrilla warfare and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Zimbabwe Author/Creator Bhebe, Ngwabi Publisher Mambo Press (Gweru) Date 1999 Resource type Books Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) Zimbabwe Source Northwestern University Libraries, Melville J. Herskovits Library of African Studies, 968.9104 B575z Rights By kind permission of Ngwabi Bhebe and Mambo Press. Description This book is an analysis of the ideologies, policies and strategies of ZANU and ZAPU.
  • Oalle°Stein, Immanuel Maurice, 1

    Oalle°Stein, Immanuel Maurice, 1

    CAMP Guide - Wallerstein Collection of Political Ephemera Immanuel Wallerstein Collection of Political Ephemera of the Liberation Movements of Lusophone Africa and Anglophone Southern Africa (1958-1975) Inventory and Reel Guide INTRODUCTION This inventory of Professor Immanuel Wallerstein's collection of political ephemera was compiled by Beverly Grier and Margaret Kinsman. Both are Yale graduate students- Ms. Grier in Political Science and Ms. Kinsman in History. The cost of their labor was borne by the now defunct Southern African Research Archival Project (SARAP) Funded by the Ford Foundation through the Northwestern University Program of African Studies. The selection of the documents to be filmed was begun by Mr. Richard Ruda, formerly a Yale graduate student in History, and completed by Ms. Kinsman. The items that were not filmed are those that are in the Chilcote Collection, filmed by the Hoover Institution Press, and serials filmed by CAMP. In some cases a different version, edition, or translation of a document may be found in Chilcote. Also omitted were clippings from Time Magazine and other readily available periodicals. In some cases entire issues of less common magazines are in the original collection but only one or two sections are relevant – only these were filmed. The cost of the filming was borne by CAMP - the Cooperative Africana Microform Project sponsored by the African Studies Association - and administered by the Center for Research Libraries. The microfilming was performed by the Yale University Library Photographic Services Department. Ms. Kinsman checked each frame against the original documents and arranged for some omitted items to be filmed and spliced in.