Molecular Phylogeny and Spore Evolution of Entolomataceae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Molecular Phylogeny and Spore Evolution of Entolomataceae Persoonia 23, 2009: 147–176 www.persoonia.org RESEARCH ARTICLE doi:10.3767/003158509X480944 Molecular phylogeny and spore evolution of Entolomataceae D. Co-David1, D. Langeveld1, M.E. Noordeloos1 Key words Abstract The phylogeny of the Entolomataceae was reconstructed using three loci (RPB2, LSU and mtSSU) and, in conjunction with spore morphology (using SEM and TEM), was used to address four main systematic issues: 1) the Clitopilus monophyly of the Entolomataceae; 2) inter-generic relationships within the Entolomataceae; 3) genus delimitation Entoloma of Entolomataceae; and 4) spore evolution in the Entolomataceae. Results confirm that the Entolomataceae (Ento­ Entolomataceae loma, Rhodocybe, Clitopilus, Richoniella and Rhodogaster) is monophyletic and that the combination of pinkish Rhodocybe spore prints and spores having bumps and/or ridges formed by an epicorium is a synapomorphy for the family. Rhodogaster The Entolomataceae is made up of two sister clades: one with Clitopilus nested within Rhodocybe and another Richoniella with Richoniella and Rhodogaster nested within Entoloma. Entoloma is best retained as one genus. The smaller spore evolution genera within Entoloma s.l. are either polyphyletic or make other genera paraphyletic. Spores of the clitopiloid type are derived from rhodocyboid spores. The ancestral spore type of the Entolomataceae was either rhodocyboid or entolomatoid. Taxonomic and nomenclatural changes are made including merging Rhodocybe into Clitopilus and transferring relevant species into Clitopilus and Entoloma. Article info Received: 21 April 2009; Accepted: 14 October 2009; Published: 19 November 2009. INTRODUCTION Monophyly of the Entolomataceae and intergeneric relationships The euagaric family Entolomataceae Kotl. & Pouzar is very The members of Entolomataceae have been classified together species-rich. It is composed of more than 1 500 species and because they all share the property of spore prints that are occurs worldwide, from arctic to tropical habitats (Horak 1980, pink to brownish or greyish pink in combination with spores 2008, Baroni 1981, Largent 1994, Noordeloos 2004, Gates & that are bumpy, ridged, or angular in polar or in all views. The Noordeloos 2007, Noordeloos & Hausknecht 2007). The fam- spore wall ornamentations are unique, being formed by local ily is highly variable in terms of sporocarp morphology (tiny to thickenings in the spore wall, the epicorium (Clémençon et al. large; pleurotoid, omphalioid, collybioid, mycenoid, and tricholo- 2004). The presence of pink, angular spores has been consid- matoid, as well as sequestrate), and micromorphology (spore ered so unique that Entolomataceae, in contrast to many other shape, pileipellis structures, pigmentation types, cystidia pres- Agaricales families, has been widely regarded a natural group ence and shape, etc.; Noordeloos 2004; Fig. 1). Lifestyles are (Kühner 1980, Singer 1986). equally varied: Most species are saprotrophic on soil, wood or moss, but some are parasitic on other mushrooms (Noordeloos Species from other genera had, in the past, been placed within 2004), parasitic on plants or ectomycorrhizal (Antibus et al. Entolomataceae. However, recent studies have excluded them. 1981, Agerer & Waller 1993, Agerer 1997, Kobayashi & Hatano Macrocystidia Joss. and Rhodotus Maire had been classified in 2001, Montecchio et al. 2006). The family traditionally contains the family on account of their pink spores, but molecular phylo- three main agaricoid genera: Rhodocybe Maire, Clitopilus (Fr. genetic studies have placed them outside the family (Moncalvo ex Rabenh.) P. Kumm. and Entoloma (Fr.) P. Kumm. s.l. The et al. 2002). Comparison of the spore wall of Rhodotus palmatus latter genus is sometimes split into more genera (e.g. 13 gen- (Bull.) Maire and members of Entolomataceae showed that era; Largent 1994). Additionally, three smaller non-agaricoid their bumps are not homologous (Clémençon 1997). Also, the genera have been distinguished on the basis of habit, namely, phylogenetic study by Moncalvo et al. (2002) suggested that the monotypic Rhodocybella T.J. Baroni & R.H. Petersen (with Catathelasma Lovejoy and a strongly supported clade contain- a cyphelloid habit), Rhodogaster E. Horak (secotioid) and Ri­ ing Callistosporium Singer, Macrocybe Pegler & Lodge and choniella Costantin & L.M. Dufour (gasteroid). Pleurocollybia Singer were best included in Entolomataceae. The more recent phylogenetic study by Matheny et al. (2006) It is no surprise that Entolomataceae, being such a large and highly variable family, raises questions that analysis of morpho- has excluded Catathelasma and Callistosporium from Entolo­ logical characters alone cannot answer, either due to scarcity mataceae with strong support. of characters and/or difficulty in interpreting the significance of Both phylogenetic studies (Moncalvo et al. 2002, Matheny et the characters. Molecular phylogenetic methods are therefore al. 2006) were based on relatively small samples of Entoloma, used in our study to address four main systematic issues: Rhodocybe and Clitopilus and none of Rhodogaster, Richoniella 1. the monophyly of the Entolomataceae; and Rhodocybella. Thus, phylogenetic relationships among 2. inter-generic relationships within the Entolomataceae; these six genera had remained unresolved. 3. genus delimitation of Entolomataceae and, with the addition of spore morphology; Spore evolution 4. spore evolution in the Entolomataceae. Spore characters have been important both to characterize 1 National Herbarium of the Netherlands, Leiden University branch, P.O. Box the family (having pink, angular spores) but also to separate 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands; corresponding authors e-mail: its three main agaricoid genera, Rhodocybe, Clitopilus and [email protected], [email protected]. Entoloma, from each other. Rhodocybe has spores with orna- © 2009 Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. 148 Persoonia – Volume 23, 2009 a b c d e f g h i j k Fig. 1 Entolomataceae variation in basidiocarp morphology. a. Entoloma prunuloides; b. E. sinuatum; c. E. catalaense; d. E. conferendum; e. E. camarophyllus; f. E. roseum; g. E. rodwayi; h. Clitopilus prunulus; i. Rhodocybe gemina; j. Richoniella pumila; k. E. uranochroum. — Photos by: a, b. Y. Deneyer; c. G. Con- siglio; d. J. Vesterholt; e, g–i. M.E. Noordeloos; f. H. Huijser; j. M. Pilkington; k. M. Meusers. mentations in the form of bumps and undulate ridges having 1980), rhodocyboid spores represent the plesiomorphic con- various arrangements resulting in spores that are undulate to dition since they are the more similar to what he considered weakly angular in profile and face views, and angular in polar the closest relative of Entolomataceae, Lepista (Fr.) W.G. Sm. view (Baroni 1981). Clitopilus is characterized by spores with (Tricholomataceae). Species of that genus have pinkish, rough- an ornamentation of longitudinal ridges. Entoloma has spores ened spores. The spores of Clitopilus are the evolutionary that are angular in all views due to its network of intercon- intermediate between Rhodocybe and Entoloma. Entoloma nected ridges that form facets and are highly varied in shape spores are the most complex and represent the most evolved (Romagnesi 1974, Pegler & Young 1978, 1979). spore form. The second theory (Baroni 1981) is similar in that There are two main theories on how spore shapes within Ento­ rhodocyboid spores are ancestral. However, Baroni based his lomataceae evolved. According to the first theory (Kühner argument that the rhodocyboid spore is the most primitive on D. Co-David et al.: Molecular phylogeny and spore evolution of Entolomataceae 149 the assumption that since pink angular spores do not exist 1. Is Entolomataceae monophyletic?; elsewhere in the Agaricales, the first Entolomataceae evolved 2. Are the main genera Rhodocybe, Clitopilus and Entoloma from an unknown member of Tricholomataceae with slightly monophyletic?; rounded-angular, pinkish spores. More pronounced angularity 3. What is the relationship of these three genera to each then derived from this. Furthermore, in contrast to Kühner’s other?; theory, clitopiloid and entolomatoid spores evolved independ- 4. What theories on spore evolution in Entolomataceae are ently from rhodocyboid spores. Note, however, that modern inconsistent with the phylogeny and should therefore be phylogenies support neither the sister relationship of Lepista rejected, and what theories are consistent with it?; nor any member of Tricholomataceae with a pink spore print. 5. How does the phylogeny inform the debate on the various Rather, it is suggested that the Lyophyllaceae are the sister taxonomic proposals for a possible generic delimitation clade of Entolomataceae and that it
Recommended publications
  • ! a Revised Generic Classification for The
    A REVISED GENERIC CLASSIFICATION FOR THE RHODOCYBE-CLITOPILUS CLADE (ENTOLOMATACEAE, AGARICALES) INCLUDING THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW GENUS, CLITOCELLA GEN. NOV. by Kerri L. Kluting A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biology Middle Tennessee State University 2013 Thesis Committee: Dr. Sarah E. Bergemann, Chair Dr. Timothy J. Baroni Dr. Andrew V.Z. Brower Dr. Christopher R. Herlihy ! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first express my appreciation and gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Sarah Bergemann, for inspiring me to push my limits and to think critically. This thesis would not have been possible without her guidance and generosity. Additionally, this thesis would have been impossible without the contributions of Dr. Tim Baroni. I would like to thank Dr. Baroni for providing critical feedback as an external thesis committee member and access to most of the collections used in this study, many of which are his personal collections. I want to thank all of my thesis committee members for thoughtfully reviewing my written proposal and thesis: Dr. Sarah Bergemann, thesis Chair, Dr. Tim Baroni, Dr. Andy Brower, and Dr. Chris Herlihy. I am also grateful to Dr. Katriina Bendiksen, Head Engineer, and Dr. Karl-Henrik Larsson, Curator, from the Botanical Garden and Museum at the University of Oslo (OSLO) and to Dr. Bryn Dentinger, Head of Mycology, and Dr. Elizabeth Woodgyer, Head of Collections Management Unit, at the Royal Botanical Gardens (KEW) for preparing herbarium loans of collections used in this study. I want to thank Dr. David Largent, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Evaluation of Gasteroid and Cyphelloid Species of Entolomataceae from Eastern North America
    A RE-EvALUATiON Of gASTEROiD AND CyPHELLOiD SPECiES Of Entolomataceae fROM EASTERN North AMERiCA TimoThy J. Baroni1 and P. Brandon maTheny2 Abstract. The gasteroid genus Richoniella and the cyphelloid genus Rhodocybella (Entolomataceae) are poorly known fungal genera that have yet to be evaluated in depth in a molecular phylogenetic context. Here, we report a recent find, including detailed descriptions and photographs, of the rarely collected gasteroid species Richo- niella asterospora from southeast North America. Phylogenetic placement of this species within a multi-gene treatment of the Entolomataceae supports the polyphyly of Richoniella. Richoniella asterospora shares an alli- ance with agaricoid and secotioid species within the diverse, heteromorphic genus Entoloma. Also rarely encoun- tered is the cyphelloid genus Rhodocybella, known only from southeast North America. Molecular annotation and phylogenetic analysis of the holotype suggest an affiliation with two lignicolous European pileate-stipitate species of Entoloma, E. pluteisimilis and E. zuccherellii. Results from molecular annotation of three additional species of Entolomataceae are also reported. in addition, we propose recognition of the following robust mono- phyletic groups: the Pouzarella clade within the genus Entoloma; and the genera Rhodocybe and Clitopilopsis and the Rhodophana clade, apart from the genus Clitopilus, within which they have been recently subsumed. Both Richoniella asterospora and Rhodocybella rhododendri are transferred to the genus Entoloma to maintain its monophyly. Keywords: Agaricales, rare fungi, Rhodocybella, Richoniella, systematics, type specimens. Phylogenetic placement of species of Entolomataceae. Rhodogaster is not known Entolomataceae, a highly diverse family of from North America and only one species of Agaricales with ca. 1100 described species Richoniella, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015 Research University of Calicut
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015 RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT Editorial Committee: The Vice Chancellor (Chairman) The Registrar The Finance Officer The Publication Officer The Public Relations Officer Adv. P. M. Niyas, Member, Syndicate Dr. V .P. Abdul Hameed, Member, Syndicate Adv. Rajeevan Mallissery, Member, Syndicate Dr. C. O. Joshi, Member, Syndicate Sri. O. Abdul Ali, Member, Syndicate Dr. Muhammedali N., Dept. of Mass Communication & Journalism, Member, Senate Sri. E. K. Vijayan M.L.A, Member, Senate Sri. Vallanchira Mohammedali,Member, Senate Sri. Prasanth Rajesh.M.S, Member, Senate Dr. Abdul Gafoor, Dept. of Education Dr. Anil Vallathol, Dept. of Malayalam Prof. Sabu, Dept. of Botany Dr. P. Raveendran, Dept. of Chemistry Prof. N. Ramani, Dept of Zoology Prof. K. K. Eliyas, Dept. of Bio-Technology Prof. Retnaraj, Dept. of Economics Superintendent, Calicut University Press Deputy Registrar, Pl. D (Convenor) CUP 11644/C/16/350 FOREWARD The research departments of a university are the places where new knowledge is created, where the theoretical and the empirical meet, where academic scholarship connects with the outside world, guiding thought, producing ideas and developing solutions. The Directorate of Research (DoR) of the University of Calicut was established on 18 April 2012 to coordinate and guide the research activities of its 171 research centres in an effective and fruitful way so that the highest possible standards of excellence would be attained. Its mission is to initiate and promote research projects that address challenges and issues in the frontier areas and to administer and guide the 37 university departments and 134 other approved research centres so that a generative research environment can be sustained and doctoral students trained in cutting edge research.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete References List
    Aanen, D. K. & T. W. Kuyper (1999). Intercompatibility tests in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex in northwestern Europe. Mycologia 91: 783-795. Aanen, D. K., T. W. Kuyper, T. Boekhout & R. F. Hoekstra (2000). Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Hebeloma based on ITS1 and 2 sequences, with special emphasis on the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex. Mycologia 92: 269-281. Aanen, D. K. & T. W. Kuyper (2004). A comparison of the application of a biological and phenetic species concept in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex within a phylogenetic framework. Persoonia 18: 285-316. Abbott, S. O. & Currah, R. S. (1997). The Helvellaceae: Systematic revision and occurrence in northern and northwestern North America. Mycotaxon 62: 1-125. Abesha, E., G. Caetano-Anollés & K. Høiland (2003). Population genetics and spatial structure of the fairy ring fungus Marasmius oreades in a Norwegian sand dune ecosystem. Mycologia 95: 1021-1031. Abraham, S. P. & A. R. Loeblich III (1995). Gymnopilus palmicola a lignicolous Basidiomycete, growing on the adventitious roots of the palm sabal palmetto in Texas. Principes 39: 84-88. Abrar, S., S. Swapna & M. Krishnappa (2012). Development and morphology of Lysurus cruciatus--an addition to the Indian mycobiota. Mycotaxon 122: 217-282. Accioly, T., R. H. S. F. Cruz, N. M. Assis, N. K. Ishikawa, K. Hosaka, M. P. Martín & I. G. Baseia (2018). Amazonian bird's nest fungi (Basidiomycota): Current knowledge and novelties on Cyathus species. Mycoscience 59: 331-342. Acharya, K., P. Pradhan, N. Chakraborty, A. K. Dutta, S. Saha, S. Sarkar & S. Giri (2010). Two species of Lysurus Fr.: addition to the macrofungi of West Bengal.
    [Show full text]
  • MYCOLEGIUM: Making Sense New Mushroom Genera: of a Ll T He Ne W Horn of Plenty Or Deluge? Mushroom Names Else C
    Courtesy M. G. Wood. MYCOLEGIUM: Making Sense New mushroom genera: of a ll t he Ne w horn of plenty or deluge? Mushroom Names Else C. Vellinga and Thomas W. Kuyper [email protected] n 2014 and the first Text box #1 – Some definitions six months of 2015 clade – a monophyletic group consisting of a common ancestor and all its descendants. alone, more than 20 genus (plural: genera) – a monophyletic group of species that have (preferably) new bolete genera were morphological characters in common. I monophyletic – a genus is called monophyletic when all its members share a proposed. Contrary to what most recent common ancestor that is not shared by species outside that many people would expect, these genera genus (the red and blue blocks in Fig. 1 represent monophyletic groups). are not restricted to some faraway exotic A single species is monophyletic by definition. locale where the boletes have novel paraphyletic – a genus is called paraphyletic, when only by including members character combinations, no, these new of another genus or other genera, all its members share a common ancestor genus names are for familiar species that (the green block in Fig. 1 represents a paraphyletic genus). occur in North America and Europe and polyphyletic – a genus is called polyphyletic as a more advanced case of that we have been calling by the name paraphyly and the members of the genus are scattered over widely different “Boletus” for a long time. clades (example: Marasmius with M. androsaceus falling inside Gymnopus, This creation of new genera is not and M. minutus outside the family Marasmiaceae).
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Entoloma Ochreoprunuloides</I>
    MYCOTAXON ISSN (print) 0093-4666 (online) 2154-8889 © 2016. Mycotaxon, Ltd. October–December 2016—Volume 131, pp. 881–887 http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/131.881 Entoloma ochreoprunuloides from Italy, with notes on its geographical distribution and allied species Francesco Dovana1, Alfredo Vizzini1*, Fabrizio Boccardo2, Marco Mucciarelli1 & Marco Clericuzio3 1Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, 10125 Torino, Italy 2Via Filippo Bettini 14/11, I-16162 Genova, Italy 3 Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Ambiente e della Vita (DISIT), Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via T. Michel 11, 15121 Alessandria, Italy * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract—An Italian collection of E. ochreoprunuloides [≡ E. prunuloides var. obscurum] is described. The specimen was identified by means of morphology, and by the analysis of its nrITS sequence. The European distribution of the species is also discussed. The sequence from a single Italian specimen of E. luteobasis suggests that E. luteobasis and E. ochreoprunuloides may be conspecific. Key words—Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes, tricholomatoid clade, taxonomy Introduction Entoloma (Fr. ex Rabenh.) P. Kumm. is a large genus of Agaricomycetes, with worldwide distribution; more than 1500 taxa have been described (Morgado et al. 2013). Until a few years ago, the systematics of Entoloma was based only on morphological data (Noordeloos 1981, 1992, 2004), but recent studies based on DNA sequences have started to appear in the literature (e.g., Co-David et al. 2009; Baroni et al. 2011; Kokkonen 2015). The consequence of these investigations is that the infrageneric subdivision is continuously evolving, but this process is just at the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,072,776 B2 Kristiansen (45) Date of Patent: *Jul
    US009072776B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,072,776 B2 Kristiansen (45) Date of Patent: *Jul. 7, 2015 (54) ANTI-CANCER COMBINATION TREATMENT 5,032,401 A 7, 1991 Jamas et al. AND KIT OF-PARTS 5,223,491 A 6/1993 Donzis 5,322,841 A 6/1994 Jamas et al. O O 5,397,773. A 3, 1995 Donzis (75) Inventor: Bjorn Kristiansen, Frederikstad (NO) 5.488,040 A 1/1996 Jamas et al. 5,504,079 A 4, 1996 Jamas et al. (73) Assignee: Glycanova AS, Gamle Fredrikstad (NO) 5,519,009 A 5/1996 Donzis 5,532,223. A 7/1996 Jamas et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,576,015 A 1 1/1996 Donzis patent is extended or adjusted under 35 3. A SE As al U.S.C. 154(b) by 424 days. 5622,940. A 4/1997 Ostroff This patent is Subject to a terminal dis- 33 A 28, AE" claimer. 5,663,324 A 9, 1997 James et al. 5,702,719 A 12/1997 Donzis (21) Appl. No.: 11/917,521 5,705,184. A 1/1998 Donzis 5,741,495 A 4, 1998 Jamas et al. (22) PCT Filed: Jun. 14, 2006 5,744,187 A 4/1998 Gaynor 5,756,318 A 5/1998 KOsuna 5,783,569 A 7/1998 Jamas et al. (86). PCT No.: PCT/DK2OO6/OOO339 5,811,542 A 9, 1998 Jamas et al. 5,817,643 A 10, 1998 Jamas et al. E. S 12, 2008 5,849,720 A 12/1998 Jamas et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Rhodocybe Species (Sect. Rufobrunnea, Entolomataceae) from the East Black Sea Coast of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2017) 41: 200-210 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1607-1 Two new Rhodocybe species (sect. Rufobrunnea, Entolomataceae) from the East Black Sea coast of Turkey 1 2, Ertuğrul SESLİ , Alfredo VIZZINI * 1 Department of Biology Education, Karadeniz Technical University, Söğütlü, Trabzon, Turkey 2 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy Received: 04.07.2016 Accepted/Published Online: 28.10.2016 Final Version: 03.04.2017 Abstract: Two new species of Rhodocybe, R. asanii and R. asyae (Entolomataceae), are described and illustrated from the East Black Sea coast of Turkey. The new species are known from two different localities in Trabzon Province. Diagnostic morphological and molecular (nrITS and nrLSU sequences) characters between the new species and their allies are compared and discussed. Rhodocybe asanii is easily distinguished from related species by its small, reddish beige, convex to plate, or irregular, fragile pileus; adnexed to sinuate lamellae; a pruinose stipe; small basidiospores; and unique sequences. Rhodocybe asyae is recognized well by a rather small, thin, salmon pink, smooth, dish or slightly cup-shaped pileus; decurrent lamellae; a small, pruinose stipe; and different sequences from R. asanii and allied taxa. Some notes on the ecology of the newly described species, a key to the thus far known Turkish Rhodocybe taxa, and phylogenetic trees are provided. Key words: Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes, Agaricales, new species, Trabzon 1. Introduction some other contributions [(Arrhenia acerosa (Fr.) Kühner, Rhodocybe Maire (1926) is a genus of Entolomataceae Entoloma politum (Pers.) Noordel.] were added from characterized by a mostly dull-colored, conical, convex or Artvin Province of Turkey previously (Demirel et al., applanate to depressed funnel-shaped pileus; a cylindrical, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Central and South American Agaricales (Basidiomycota) I: Entolomataceae
    Mycosphere 5 (3): 475-487 (2014) ISSN 2077 7019 www.mycosphere.org Article Mycosphere Copyright © 2014 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/5/3/10 Checklist of Central and South American Agaricales (Basidiomycota) I: Entolomataceae Coimbra VRM1 1 Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Micologia/CCB, Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia de Fungos, Av. Prof. Nelson Chaves, s/n, CEP: 50670-901, Recife-PE, Brazil; email: [email protected] Coimbra VRM 2014 – Checklist of Central and South American Agaricales (Basidiomycota) I: Entolomataceae. Mycosphere 5(3), 475-487, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/5/3/10 Abstract A literature-based checklist of Entolomataceae species (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) occurring in Central and South Americas is provided. In total, 271 species belonging to 13 genera are reported, representing roughly 18% of the known taxa worldwide. Here, Brazil (107 spp.) and Argentina (80 spp.) were the most representative countries. This list does not reflect the real diversity of Entolomataceae in Neotropics but covers only our limited and inconclusive knowledge. Key words – agarics – America – diversity Introduction Entolomataceae Kotl. & Pouzar (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) is a very rich family which includes more than 1,500 species distributed worldwide and occurring in almost every kinds of vegetation and soil (Noordeloos 1987, Co-David 2009, Noordeloos & Gates 2012). Most of its members are saprophytic, but few ectomycorrhizal species are known (Antibus et al. 1981, Noordeloos 1984, Agerer & Waller 1993). This family has been subject of several taxonomic studies around the world, mainly: Africa (Eyssartier et al. 2001, Noordeloos & Hauksnecht 2007), Asia (Manimohan et al. 1995, 2006, He et al. 2013), Europe (Noordeloos 1987, Orton 1991, Noordeloos & Morozova 2010), Oceania (Horak 1980, Gates & Noordeloos 2007, Noordeloos & Gates 2012) and North America (Baroni & Largent 1989, Horak & Desjardin 1993, Largent 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Entolomataceae, Agaricales
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal MycoKeysA 36: new 21–33 species (2018) of Rhodocybe sect. Rufobrunnea (Entolomataceae, Agaricales) from Italy 21 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.36.27094 RESEARCH ARTICLE MycoKeys http://mycokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new species of Rhodocybe sect. Rufobrunnea (Entolomataceae, Agaricales) from Italy Alfredo Vizzini1, Renato Jonny Ferrari2, Enrico Ercole1, Alessandro Fellin3 1 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, I-10125, Torino, Italy 2 Santo Stefano 46, I-39030, San Lorenzo di Sebato (BZ), Italy 3 Via G. Canestrini 10/B, I-38028, Revò (TN), Italy Corresponding author: Alfredo Vizzini ([email protected]) Academic editor: M-A Neves | Received 30 May 2018 | Accepted 30 June 2018 | Published 10 July 2018 Citation: Vizzini A, Ferrari RJ, Ercole E, Fellin A (2018) A new species of Rhodocybe sect. Rufobrunnea (Entolomataceae, Agaricales) from Italy. MycoKeys 36: 21–33. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.36.27094 Abstract Rhodocybe fumanellii is described from Italy as a new species based both on morphological and molecu- lar nrITS/nrLSU data. It belongs in sect. Rufobrunnea and is characterised by massive tricholomatoid basidiomata with reddish-brown tinges, adnate and crowded lamellae, an enlarged stipe base with long rhizomorphs, long sinuose slender cheilocystidia, ellipsoid basidiospores and the presence of caulocystidia. Drawings of the main micromorphological features as well as a colour photograph of fresh basidiomata in situ are provided and its morphological relationships with allied species are discussed. Keywords Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota, Molecular markers, Phylogeny, Taxonomy Introduction Recently, Kluting et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Papp Viktor.Pdf
    Doktori (PhD) értekezés A Juhdöglő-völgy Erdőrezervátum lignikol bazídiumos nagygombáinak taxonómiája és természetvédelmi helyzete PAPP VIKTOR Témavezető: Dr. Rimóczi Imre, DSc professor emeritus Budapest 2015 A doktori iskola megnevezése: Kertészettudományi Doktori Iskola tudományága: 4. Agrártudományok (4.1 Növénytermesztési és kertészeti tudományok) vezetője: Dr. Tóth Magdolna, DSc egyetemi tanár Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Kertészettudományi Kar, Gyümölcstermő Növények Tanszék Témavezető: Dr. Rimóczi Imre, DSc professor emeritus Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Kertészettudományi Kar, Növénytani Tanszék és Soroksári Botanikus Kert A doktori iskola- és a témavezető jóváhagyó aláírása: A jelölt a Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Doktori Szabályzatában előírt valamennyi feltételnek eleget tett, az értekezés műhelyvitájában elhangzott észrevételeket és javaslatokat az értekezés átdolgozásakor figyelembe vette, ezért az értekezés védési eljárásra bocsátható. .................................................. .................................................. Dr. Tóth Magdolna Dr. Rimóczi Imre doktori iskola vezető témavezető 1 A Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Élettudományi Területi Doktori Tanácsának 2015. december 8-i határozatában a nyilvános vita lefolytatására az alábbi bíráló Bizottságot jelölte ki: BÍRÁLÓ BIZOTTSÁG: Elnöke: Balázs Sándor, MHAS, BCE Tagjai: Terbe István, DSc, BCE Lőkös László, PhD, MTM Bartha Dénes, DSc, NyME Opponensek: Vetter János, DSc, SZIE Lenti István, CSc, Nyíregyházi Főiskola Titkár: Balázs Gábor, PhD, BCE 2 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK
    [Show full text]