DOCSLIB.ORG

The Making of Taiwan Province, 1872–1887

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Making of Taiwan Province, 1872–1887 Chapter 21 The Making of Taiwan Province, 1872–1887 The wars for control over Taiwan in the seventeenth century between the Dutch, the Ming loyalist Zheng Chenggong, and the Qing Empire ended when the Manchus annexed the island in 1683. The Manchu overlords proved re- luctant colonizers who were satisfied with keeping Taiwan out of the hands of its enemies, making it a part of Fujian province, and maintaining an inner frontier zone on the island between Han settlers and the upland indigenous population. Starting in the 1860s, however, the “Beautiful Isle” (Formosa) found itself an object of colonial desire by the European treaty port powers, Qing self- strengthening modernizers, and Japanese imperialists. Intense global interest in Taiwan re-emerged in the immediate aftermath of the Second Opium War (1856–1860), when the island became part of the treaty port system with the opening of Danshui (Tamsui) and Anping (Tainan). Relatively quickly, Taiwan was integrated into long-distance trading networks as global markets hungered for its sugar, camphor, and tea. This demand led to an increase in commodity production and the penetration of Han settlers into upland areas to harvest camphor and open lands for tea cultivation, which only worsened interethnic strife with the indigenous peoples. Despite the con- flicts, the quick and easy profits to be had only whetted the appetite of impe- rialist interest in Taiwan. In late 1871, the indigenous Paiwan people murdered more than fifty sail- ors from the Liuqiu (Ryukyu) archipelago, who had become marooned on the southern tip of Taiwan during a typhoon. The massacre sparked a heated debate between the Qing and Japan over the sovereignty of both Taiwan and the Liuqiu Islands that ended with a Japanese “punitive” expedition against the aborigines in 1874. In response, the Qing appointed Shen Baozhen, the di- rector of the Fuzhou Shipyard, as an imperial commissioner to deal with the Japanese and to begin a reform program that would ensure Qing sovereignty over Taiwan. Shen Baozhen, Ding Richang, and Liu Mingchuan, the three most famous ranking officials in Taiwan between 1874 and 1891, brought the self-strength- ening approach to the island. Over these seventeen years, Shen, Ding, and Liu strengthened Qing military control by purchasing Western guns, building forts, and reforming the local Green Army forces; expanded local government by in- creasing the number of administrative offices and districts; fostered economic modernization by attempting to enhance Taiwan’s revenue base through fiscal © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi 10.1163/9789004361003_023 The Making of Taiwan Province, 1872–1887 225 rationalization; bolstered gentry formation and the spread of elite culture; and encouraged Han colonization in the aftermath of a series of aggressive “pacification” campaigns against the indigenous peoples known as “Opening Up the Mountains and Pacifying the Aborigines” (kaishan fufan 開山撫番). Government reforms on Taiwan accelerated after Liu Mingchuan became gov- ernor of Fujian and defender of Taiwan during the Sino-French War of 1884–85. In the years after the war, Liu rebuilt damaged military installations, expanded the railroad network, started a steamship company, expanded telegraph lines, and opened a modern post office. In 1885, the Qing Court also authorized the creation of Taiwan province, with Liu as its first governor, but it would take until 1887 for all the necessary preparations to be completed. July 14, 1872 The viceroy and lieut.-governor of Fujian report that the commander-in-chief of the provincial forces has gone to Formosa on a tour of inspection. In the 53rd year of the reign Qianlong (1788) the following edict was received by the Fujian authorities.1 Formosa, from its isolated position and the turbulent character of its inhabitants, is a convenient spot for plotting and sedition; we therefore direct that the Manchu general, the viceroy, lieut.-governor and commander- in-chief make, in routine, periodic visits to the island, and forward a report thereon to the Throne. A similar edict was received in the 11th year of Jiaqing, and again in the 15th year of the same reign. The latter edict ordered that the visit should be biennial. But since 1847 the only visit to the island was made by the admiral of Fujian, in 1867. The authorities have therefore felt it their duty to depute one of their number to visit it this year, and have accordingly sent the commander-in-chief. He started from Xiamen in a steamer, and has already arrived at Formosa. As soon as he has completed his tour, a report will be for- warded to the Throne. April 16–17, 1874 The Governor-General of Fujian and Zhejiang memorializes respecting the appointment of an officer to fill the post of colonel of the naval brigade in 1 In 1788, the Qing government suppressed a major Triad uprising known as the Lin Shuangwen rebellion on Taiwan..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Issue Taiwan and Ireland In
    TAIWAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Taiwan in Comparative Perspective is the first scholarly journal based outside Taiwan to contextualize processes of modernization and globalization through interdisciplinary studies of significant issues that use Taiwan as a point of comparison. The primary aim of the Journal is to promote grounded, critical, and contextualized analysis in English of economic, political, societal, and environmental change from a cultural perspective, while locating modern Taiwan in its Asian and global contexts. The history and position of Taiwan make it a particularly interesting location from which to examine the dynamics and interactions of our globalizing world. In addition, the Journal seeks to use the study of Taiwan as a fulcrum for discussing theoretical and methodological questions pertinent not only to the study of Taiwan but to the study of cultures and societies more generally. Thereby the rationale of Taiwan in Comparative Perspective is to act as a forum and catalyst for the development of new theoretical and methodological perspectives generated via critical scrutiny of the particular experience of Taiwan in an increasingly unstable and fragmented world. Editor-in-chief Stephan Feuchtwang (London School of Economics, UK) Editor Fang-Long Shih (London School of Economics, UK) Managing Editor R.E. Bartholomew (LSE Taiwan Research Programme) Editorial Board Chris Berry (Film and Television Studies, Goldsmiths College, UK) Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao (Sociology and Civil Society, Academia Sinica, Taiwan) Sung-sheng Yvonne Chang (Comparative Literature, University of Texas, USA) Kent Deng (Economic History, London School of Economics, UK) Bernhard Fuehrer (Sinology and Philosophy, School of Oriental and African Studies, UK) Mark Harrison (Asian Languages and Studies, University of Tasmania, Australia) Bob Jessop (Political Sociology, Lancaster University, UK) Paul R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circulation and Interpretation of Taiping Depositions
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Senior Honors Papers / Undergraduate Theses Undergraduate Research Spring 5-17-2019 A War of Words: The irC culation and Interpretation of Taiping Depositions Jordan Weinstock Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/undergrad_etd Part of the Asian History Commons Recommended Citation Weinstock, Jordan, "A War of Words: The irC culation and Interpretation of Taiping Depositions" (2019). Senior Honors Papers / Undergraduate Theses. 15. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/undergrad_etd/15 This Unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Research at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Papers / Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A War of Words: The Circulation and Interpretation of Taiping Depositions By Jordan Weinstock A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for Honors in History In the College of Arts and Sciences Washington University Advisor: Steven B. Miles April 1 2019 © Copyright by Jordan Weinstock, 2019. All rights reserved. Abstract: On November 18, 1864, the death knell of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom was rung. Hong Tiangui Fu had been killed. Hong, divine leader of the once nascent kingdom and son of the Heavenly Kingdom’s founder, was asked to confess before his execution, making him one of the last figures to speak directly on behalf of the Qing’s most formidable opposition. The movement Hong had inherited was couched in anti-Manchu sentiment, pseudo-Marxist thought, and a distinct, unorthodox, Christian vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Bannerman and Townsman: Ethnic Tension in Nineteenth-Century Jiangnan
    Bannerman and Townsman: Ethnic Tension in Nineteenth-Century Jiangnan Mark Elliott Late Imperial China, Volume 11, Number 1, June 1990, pp. 36-74 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/late.1990.0005 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/late/summary/v011/11.1.elliott.html Access Provided by Harvard University at 02/16/13 5:36PM GMT Vol. 11, No. 1 Late Imperial ChinaJune 1990 BANNERMAN AND TOWNSMAN: ETHNIC TENSION IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY JIANGNAN* Mark Elliott Introduction Anyone lucky enough on the morning of July 21, 1842, to escape the twenty-foot high, four-mile long walls surrounding the city of Zhenjiang would have beheld a depressing spectacle: the fall of the city to foreign invaders. Standing on a hill, looking northward across the city toward the Yangzi, he might have decried the masts of more than seventy British ships anchored in a thick nest on the river, or perhaps have noticed the strange shapes of the four armored steamships that, contrary to expecta- tions, had successfully penetrated the treacherous lower stretches of China's main waterway. Might have seen this, indeed, except that his view most likely would have been screened by the black clouds of smoke swirling up from one, then two, then three of the city's five gates, as fire spread to the guardtowers atop them. His ears dinned by the report of rifle and musket fire and the roar of cannon and rockets, he would scarcely have heard the sounds of panic as townsmen, including his own relatives and friends, screamed to be allowed to leave the city, whose gates had been held shut since the week before by order of the commander of * An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Manchu Studies (Manzokushi kenkyùkai) at Meiji University, Tokyo, in November 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Internatioanl Symposium on Lin Zexu, the Opium War and Hong Kong = Lin Zexu, Ya Pian Zhan Zheng Yu Xianggang Guo Ji Yan Tao
    c * Jointly organized by ft W (# Hong Kong Museum of Hislory. Pro\ isional Urban Council Hit^fr Lin Ze.\u Koundalion Association of Chinese Histonans M -f: ' I International Symposium on Lin Zexu, the Opium War and Hong Kong ate: 18-19.12.98 = 'Lin Zexu and the Opium War " Exhibitii Date of Opening: 1 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 1' ( Canada-Hong Kong Resource Centre 1 Spadioa Crescent, Rm. Ill • Toronto, Canada • M5S 1A1 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2009 with funding from Multicultural Canada; University of Toronto Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/linzexuyapianzhaOOhong ) ) #^ List of Parti cipants ( ( Listed in alphabetical order) Mainland: 1. Prof. Dai Xueji (Institute of Social Sciences, Fujian) 2. Prof. Deng Kaisong (Office of Hong Kong and Macau History, Institute of Social Sciences, Guangdong 3. Prof. Hao Guiyuan (Institute of World History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) 4. M Prof. Huang Shunli (Department of History, University of Xiamen) 5. Prof. Jiang Dachun (Institute of Modern History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) 6. Prof. Lai Xinxia (Local Document Research Institute, Nankai University) 7. I Prof. Li Hongsheng (University of Social Sciences, Guangdong I History Society, Guangdong 8. Prof. Lin Qingyuan (Department of History, Fujian Normal University) 9. Prof. Lin Zidong (Federation of Social Sciences, Fujian) 10. Prof. Ling Qing (Lin Zexu Foundation) 11. Prof. Liu Shuyong (Institute of Modem History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) 12. Prof. Wang Rufeng (Department of History, The People's University of China) 13. Prof. Xiao Zhizhi (Academy of History and Culture, University of Wuhan) 14. Jl Prof. Yang Guozhen (Institute of Historical Research, University of Xiamen) 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmentalism in Late Qing China, –
    The Historical Journal, , (), pp. – © The Author(s), . Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/./), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. doi:./SX DEVELOPMENTALISM IN LATE QING CHINA, – * JONATHAN CHAPPELL Independent scholar ABSTRACT. This article explores the changing historical referents that Qing officials used in arguing for the extension of direct governance to the empire’s frontier regions from the sto the s. In the s, Shen Baozhen and Zuo Zongtang made the case for a change of governance on Taiwan and in Xinjiang respectively by reference to past Chinese frontier management. However, in the first decade of the twentieth century Cen Chunxuan and Yao Xiguang both referred to the European past, and specifically the history of European colonialism, to argue for reform of frontier policy in Mongolia. I argue that this shift was a result of both the empire’s altered political circum- stances and a growing belief in the inevitability of an evolutionary fate which awaited nomadic peoples, who were destined to be colonized. Yet this was not a case of Chinese thinkers simply adopting European ideas and perspectives wholesale. The adoption of European historical referents was entangled with Han Chinese perceptions of Mongolian populations which had been carefully culti- vated by the Manchu Qing state.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Warfare and the Refraction of China's Self-Strengthening Reforms
    Modern Asian Studies 38, 2 (2004), pp. 283–326. 2004 Cambridge University Press DOI:10.1017/S0026749X04001088 Printed in the United Kingdom Naval Warfare and the Refraction of China’s Self-Strengthening Reforms into Scientific and Technological Failure, 1865–18951 BENJAMIN A. ELMAN Princeton University In the 1950s and 1960s, Chinese, Western, and Japanese scholarship debated the success or failure of the government schools and regional arsenals established between 1865 and 1895 to reform Qing China (1644–1911). For example, Quan Hansheng contended in 1954 that the Qing failure to industrialize after the Taiping Rebellion (1850–64) was the major reason why China lacked modern weapons during the Sino-Japanese War.2 This position has been built on in recent reassessments of the ‘Foreign Affairs Movement’ (Yangwu yundong) and Sino-Japanese War of 1894–95 ( Jiawu zhanzheng) by Chinese scholars. They argue, with some dissent, that the inadequacies of the late Qing Chinese navy and army were due to poor armaments, insufficient training, lack of leadership, vested interests, lack of funding, and low morale. In aggregate, these factors are thought to demonstrate the inadequacies of the ‘Self- Strengthening era’ and its industrial programs.3 1 An earlier version was presented at the conference ‘The Disunity of Chinese Science,’ organized by Roger Hart (University of Texas, Austin), sponsored by the History of Science Program at the University of Chicago, May 10–12, 2002.My thanks to an anonymous reader who suggested parts to expand and who also dir- ected me to important recent work on the topic. 2 Quan Hansheng, ‘Jiawu zhanzhen yiqian de Zhongguo gongyehua yundong,’ Lishi yuyan yanjiusuo jikan 25, 1 (1954): 77–8.
    [Show full text]
  • SUN YAT-SENS: CONTESTED IMAGES of a POLITICAL ICON By
    SUN YAT-SENS: CONTESTED IMAGES OF A POLITICAL ICON by THOMAS EVAN FISCHER A THESIS Presented to the Asian Studies Program and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts September 2020 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Thomas Evan Fischer Title: Sun Yat-sens: Contested Images of a Political Icon This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Asian Studies Program by: Bryna Goodman Chairperson Ina Asim Member Daniel Buck Member and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2020 ii © 2020 Thomas Evan Fischer iii THESIS ABSTRACT Thomas Evan Fischer Master of Arts Asian Studies Program September 2020 Title: Sun Yat-sens: Contested Images of a Political Icon This thesis explores the afterlives of the Chinese revolutionary icon Sun Yat- sen and their relevant contexts, arguing that these contexts have given rise to different images of the same figure. It serves as a gallery in which these different images are put into conversation with one another, revealing new insights into each. Key to the discussion, Sun is first introduced in a short biography. Then, the thesis moves to his different afterlives: Sun and the fight for his posthumous approval in the Republic of China before 1949; Sun and his usage in Chinese Communist political rhetoric from 1956 through 2016; Sun and his changing image in the ROC-Taiwan, a change that reflects the contentious political environment of an increasingly bentu Taiwan; Sun and two of his images among the overseas Chinese of Hawaii and Penang.
    [Show full text]
  • State Adoption of Transformative Technology: Early Railroad Adoption in China and Japan
    International Studies Quarterly (2017) 0,1–14 State Adoption of Transformative Technology: Early Railroad Adoption in China and Japan J ON SCHMID AND JONATHAN H UANG Georgia Institute of Technology Steam locomotives, a transformative transportation technology, experienced quick and wide adoption among major Western powers in the nineteenth century. However, when this technology reached East Asia later in the century, Japan enthusiastically adopted it while China did not. Why was this the case? This article investigates the difference in railroad technology adoption between late Qing China and Meiji-era Japan. Through analysis of historical accounts as well as original source documents, we argue that variations in concern for internal and external security were important determinants of the distinct adoption deci- sions. The Qing Court’s apprehension that technological change would lead to domestic social unrest and make China vulnera- ble to external threats deterred it from adopting railroads. In Japan, the Meiji leadership faced a less-pronounced internal and external threat environment. This allowed them to focus on the railroads’ potential to drive economic growth, consolidate ad- ministrative rule, and mobilize military resources. Our results suggest that perceptions regarding a technology’s expected effects may contribute more to technology adoption decisions than is suggested by the prevailing literature. Introduction this technology reached East Asia in the 1850s, however, Japan enthusiastically and effectively adopted it, while National and local governments increasingly face adoption China resisted foreign attempts to build rail lines and decisions for potentially transformative technologies such failed to support an indigenous domestic railroad indus- as autonomous vehicles, smart electricity grids, commercial try.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Japanese Effort to Colonize Taiwan and the Chinese Reaction
    Athens Journal of History - Volume 4, Issue 4 – Pages 307-328 The First Japanese effort to colonize Taiwan and the Chinese Reaction By Nikolaos Mavropoulos Successful modernization at home, the self-congratulatory ideology of State Shintō and the trend of the time made Japan’s expansion appear as an act of benevolence towards its adjacent, more underdeveloped nations. Before expanding abroad however the new leadership had to solidify its rule and authority in the Japanese archipelago. Initially the main Japanese islands were brought under submission and were ruled almost despotically by the Satchō leaders that came to dominate the government after their victory over the old regime. Clans were relocated or brushed aside, people were taught the standard national language and made into loyal subjects and the entire nation suddenly acquired after centuries of division a common identity (internal colonialism). Japan rapidly embraced the colonial theories and imperialistic reasoning of the West. Strategic considerations about the safety of the nation spurred Tōkyō towards controlling, absorbing or reforming the Chinese held island of Taiwan. A relatively unknown military as well as a diplomatic clash with China took place in the 1870s for the control of his island. Literature Review Until the 1990s those few interested in Japan’s rule over Taiwan were faced with several obstacles due to the Cold War era’s politics and Taiwan’s delicate situation; it was only then that the official documents of the Japanese administration in the island were finally made accessible to the public. The liquidation of the Japanese empire was not a voluntary act; it was a result of Tōkyō’s military defeat in the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE (Abbreviated)
    CURRICULUM VITAE (abbreviated) PONG, David B.P.T., Professor of East Asian History Qualifications: B.A. (Hons.) & Ph.D., History, School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London Courses: HIST 137 East Asian Civilizations: China HIST 365 British Colonialism in East Asia HIST 368 Modern China, 1600-1921 HIST 369 China since 1900 HIST 479 20th-Century China – Seminar HIST 679 20th-Century China – Seminar Awards & Honors (selected): Royal Asiatic Society Forlong Exhibition; Research Fellow, Institute of Historical Research, University of London; American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Research Fellowship; Research Fellow, Department of Far Eastern History, Research School of Pacific Studies, Institute of Advanced Studies, Australian National University; Honorary Research Fellow, Modern History Research Centre, The Hong Kong Baptist University; University of Delaware College of Arts and Science Outstanding Service Award; Title VI, “Undergraduate International Studies & Foreign Languages” Grant ($173,000) for strengthening East Asian Studies Program (Principal Investigator, served with Professor Alice Ba as co-directors); Fulbright Scholar-in-Residence, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2009-2010. Publications -- BOOKS: 1. Taiwan haifang bing kaishan riji (The defense and development of Taiwan, 1874-75: the journal of Brigade-General Luo Dachun), by Luo Dachun, compiled and edited with a critical Introduction and Index by David Pong (Taipei: The Economic Research Department, Bank of Taiwan, 1972), 8 + 128 pages. 2. A Critical Guide to the Kwangtung Provincial Archives Deposited at the Public Record Office of London. Harvard East Asian Monographs, No. 63 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1975), 12 + 203 pages. 3. Ideal and Reality: Social and Political Change in Modern China, 186O-1949 (University Press of America, October 1985; Second Printing, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a History of Modern Science in Republican China 15 Benjamin A
    Science and Technology in Modern China, 1880s-1940s Edited by Jing Tsu and Benjamin A. Elman LEIDEN | BOSTON This is a digital offprint for restricted use only | © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV Contents List of Figures vii Notes on Contributors ix Introduction 1 Jing Tsu and Benjamin A. Elman Toward a History of Modern Science in Republican China 15 Benjamin A. Elman Historiography of Science and Technology in China The First Phase 39 Iwo Amelung Disciplining the National Essence Liu Shipei and the Reinvention of Ancient China’s Intellectual History 67 Joachim Kurtz Science in Translation Yan Fu’s Role 93 Shen Guowei Chinese Scripts, Codes, and Typewriting Machines 115 Jing Tsu Semiotic Sovereignty The 1871 Chinese Telegraph Code in Historical Perspective 153 Thomas S. Mullaney Proofreading Science Editing and Experimentation in Manuals by a 1930s Industrialist 185 Eugenia Lean The Controversy over Spontaneous Generation in Republican China Science, Authority, and the Public 209 Fa-ti Fan Bridging East and West through Physics William Band at Yenching University 245 Danian Hu Periodical Space Language and the Creation of Scientific Community in Republican China 269 Grace Shen This is a digital offprint for restricted use only | © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV vi Contents Operatic Escapes Performing Madness in Neuropsychiatric Beijing 297 Hugh Shapiro Index 327 Contents Notes on Contributors ix Introduction 1 Jing Tsu and Benjamin A. Elman Introduction 1 Toward a History of Modern Science in Republican China 15 Benjamin A. Elman 15 Historiography of Science and Technology in China 39 The First Phase 39 Iwo Amelung 39 Disciplining the National Essence 67 Liu Shipei and the Reinvention of Ancient China’s Intellectual History 67 Joachim Kurtz 67 Science in Translation 93 Yan Fu’s Role 93 Shen Guowei 93 Chinese Scripts, Codes, and Typewriting Machines 115 Jing Tsu 115 Semiotic Sovereignty 153 The 1871 Chinese Telegraph Code in Historical Perspective 153 Thomas S.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Aesthetics of Taipei City Walls 15
    OriginalThe Bulletin papers of JSSD Received February 2, 2012; Accepted February 1, 2016 determinants of emotional state Psychological Review 1962; 613-622. Original paper 69: 379-399. 29. Essa IA, Pentland AP. Coding, analysis, interpretation, and 14. Reevy GM. Encyclopedia of emotion. Santa Barbara, recognition of facial expressions. IEEE Transactions on Greenwood: CA, 2010. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1997; 19(7): DESIGN AESTHETICS OF TAIPEI CITY WALLS 15. Fridlund AJ. Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. 757-63. Academic Press: London, 2014. 30. Valstar M. Automatic facial expression analysis. In Mandal Aesthetic Principles and Culture Preservation 16. Mahrabian A. Silent messages. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA, MK, Awasthi A (Eds.), Understanding facial expressions in 1981. communication. Springer: India, 2015; 143-172. 17. Ekman P, Friesen WV. Facial action coding system: A 31. Pos O, Green-Armytage P. Facial expression, colors and Chang-Rong LIN *, Ta-Wei KUO**, Yu-Fu YANG**, Hsuan-Chu CHEN**, Jui-Che TU** technique for the measurement of facial movement. basic emotions. Color: Design & Creativity 2007; 1(1): 2, Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Also, 1978. 1-20. *Department of Art Industry, National Taitung University 18. Ekman P, Friesen WV, O'Sullivan M, Diacoyanni-T I, 32. Lajevardi SM, Wu HR. Facial expression recognition in 369, Sec. 2, University Rd., Taitung, Taiwan, R.O.C. Krause R, Pitcairn T, Scherer K, et al. Universals and cultural perceptual color space. IEEE Transactions on Image ** Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology,Yunlin differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Processing 2012; 21(8): 3721-3733.
    [Show full text]