Birmingham City Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Birmingham City Council BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE 15 MARCH 2012 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE HELD ON THURSDAY, 15 MARCH 2012 AT 1100 HOURS IN COMMITTEE ROOMS 3 AND 4, COUNCIL HOUSE, BIRMINGHAM PRESENT :- Councillor Douglas Osborn in the Chair; Councillors Beauchamp, Clancy, Cornish, Delaney, Henley, Hutchings, Jones, Linnecor, Smith and Willis. ****************************** PUBLIC ATTENDANCE 8705 The Chairman welcomed members of the public to the meeting, indicating that a leaflet had been circulated explaining how the Committee operated. He stressed that, because the Committee was a quasi-judicial one, no decisions had been made before the meeting. _______________________________________________________________ APOLOGIES 8706 Apologies for non-attendance were submitted on behalf of Councillors Fazal, Griffiths, Sharpe and Zaffar. _______________________________________________________________ CHAIRMAN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS (A) Future Meetings 8707 The Chairman reported that the next 3 meetings were scheduled on Thursday 22 March, Wednesday 4 April and then Thursday 12 April 2012. _______________________________________________________________ (B) Letter Received 8708 The Chairman reported that a letter had been received from the University Hospital concerning parking, which was circulated to all Members. _______________________________________________________________ 1088 Planning Committee – 15 March 2012 MINUTES 8709 The Minutes of the meeting held on 1 March 2012 were approved as a true and correct record subject to the following insertion:- Councillor Smith requested the following be inserted to Report 20 – Royal Mail Delivery Office, Upper Cliton Road, Sutton Coldfield – 2011/08084/PA (8694 refers):- Councillor Smith commented that English Heritage listed the 1942 Building for a reason, namely its heritage value and not its aesthetics. _______________________________________________________________ MATTERS ARISING 8710 There were no matters arising. _______________________________________________________________ NOTIFICATION BY MEMBERS OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS THAT THEY CONSIDER SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY COMMITTEE Planning Application No 2012/00392/PA – Land to rear 174 Baldwins Lane, Hall Green, Birmingham, B28 0QA 8711 Councillor Smith requested that this application be referred to Committee for determination in view of the access way and properties in the surrounding area. _______________________________________________________________ PETITIONS 8712 There were no petitions received. _______________________________________________________________ REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND REGENERATION The following report was submitted:- (See document No. 1) Planning Application in respect of the City Centre Report No. 7 – 1-3 Bond Street, Hockley - 2011/08319/PA Councillor Smith welcomed this application and expressed her appreciation of the way in which this locally listed building was to be retained. 8713 RESOLVED :- That planning permission be granted for the reason(s) set out in the report, subject to the conditions specified therein. _______________________________________________________________ 1089 Planning Committee – 15 March 2012 Planning Applications in respect of the North West area Report No. 8 – 156 Birmingham Road, Wychbold Hotel, Sutton Coldfield - 2011/08638/PA Councillor Maureen Cornish expressed her concerns in relation to the applicant requesting a further 3 year extension period for the implementation of the development. She considered that the current state of the property was poorly maintained and posed a health and safety issue. She also suggested that an additional condition be inserted in relation to this. Councillor Beauchamp concurred with Councillor Maureen Cornish’s views and further added that the site was not being looked after and that the applicant should be asked to commence with the development. The Chairman then sought clarification from Members in relation to referring their concerns over the conditions of the site to Regulatory Services, which was agreed by all. 8714 RESOLVED :- That the matter be referred to Regulatory Services in relation to the concerns raised above in relation to the condition of the site. _______________________________________________________________ Report No. 9 - Royal Mail Delivery Office, Upper Clifton Road, Sutton Coldfield - 2011/08088/PA The Area Planning Manager (North West) reported updates on the report as follows:- (1) Condition 15 to be removed as an amended road and car park layout had been received and was now satisfactory. (2) Condition 17 – Tree works – to be amended to require specific compliance with the arboricultural report. (3) Amendments to the structure of remaining conditions to allow the separate discharge as conditions relating to the residential/office and delivery office elements of the scheme. Councillor Maureen Cornish commented that she supported Option A which would be better for local residents. She considered that whilst Option B met the requirements, a large number of trees would have to be removed. She indicated that this site would need to be redeveloped one way or another and emphasised that both options A and B should have been presented at the same time. Councillor Clancy sought clarification as to whether or not there would be loss of the woodland as per the model displayed. 1090 Planning Committee – 15 March 2012 Councillor Jones indicated that she did not agree with Option A and had some concerns with Option B. She made reference to potential access problems to Tudor Hill as whilst on the site visit the coach was having great difficulty in turning around. She emphasised that there could be 27 houses using this access, removal vans and future delivery problems. She also sought clarification as to how many visitors were estimated to visit the 1879 listed building. Councillor Hutchings concurred with Councillor Maureen Cornish’s comments and considered that this application was unsatisfactory and that he would be voting against it. Councillor Smith sought clarification as to what percentage of the listed building would be lost, to which the response was 50%. The Area Planning Manager (North West) in responding to Members’ queries emphasised that each application should be considered on its own merits. He reported that the proposal had been developed in conjunction with the advice from the Conservation Officer to obtain a balance in order to preserve the building and allow the post office to operate their business. The Area Planning Manager (North West) then indicated that any impact on trees would be inevitable, however, Option B would have a lesser impact than Option A. He then reported that there would be a loss of some trees around the woodland edge which would be replaced and the long term plan would be to achieve healthier trees on the site. The Transportation Officer reported that Option B allowed improved turning facilities for vehicles to access the Tudor House site. An assessment was carried out on residential traffic and there were no highway issues. Councillor Linnecor sought clarification as to what percentage of trees would be lost. The Area Planning Manager (North West) reported that in terms of the tree survey the aim was to retain as many trees as possible but there were a selection of trees that had to be removed. The Tree Officer looked at the future of the woodland and ways to maximise the health of retained trees. Councillor Beauchamp considered that Option A was a far better proposal than Option B as Option A would have a Heritage Centre which would allow visitors to visit, whereas Option B would have an emphasis on commercial business. He expressed his disappointment at the Post Office for presenting the proposals in this manner and, therefore, it would be a difficult decision to make. Councillor Smith highlighted that it was important to respect the views of the English Heritage as it was crucial that the heritage was not lost. The Area Planning Manager (South) highlighted that the proposed Option B was a good way forward in achieving both an opportunity for the post office and 1091 Planning Committee – 15 March 2012 also to preserve the 1879 listed building. He considered that Option B offered a wide package of benefits within the scheme: the listed buildings, improving a run-down site, maintaining the Post Office on site, maintaining access to the potential future railway station next door, new housing, and long-term tree management. It was then put to the vote to approve the application, 2 voted in favour, 6 voted against, and 2 abstained. Councillor Linnecor proposed deferring the application in order to see an Option C, seconded by Councillor Hutchings. The Area Planning Manager (South) noted that discussions for the site had been in progress for years and that there was no Option C, and that the Committee needed to determine the application before them. Councillor Linnecor proposed reasons for refusal: demolition of the listed building, insufficient Section 106 monies, ecology, and transportation. The Transportation Officer stated he would wish to discuss further any possible highway reasons for refusal. It was then moved to defer the application in order to receive further advice on the four areas of concern: 5 voted in favour, 3 voted against and 2 abstentions. 8715 RESOLVED :- That consideration of this application be deferred minded to refuse and pending further information. _______________________________________________________________ Report No. 10 - Royal Mail Delivery
Recommended publications
  • Guest Rooms Directory
    Guest rooms directory If you are an existing customer, a friend/relative of an existing customer or an employee of Anchor Hanover, you can make a request to stay at any of the guest rooms at the locations in the list below. The location will charge a small fee which is determined by the manager and residents of each location. The locations below are grouped by county and the counties are arranged in alphabetical order. When you have found a suitable location, please phone the manager on the number provided to discuss and arrange your booking. County Name of location Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Postcode Telephone Bedfordshire Dame Alice Court 19 Newnham Street Bedford MK40 3NR 01234 347 733 Bedfordshire Eleanor's Court Dunstable LU6 1SB 01582 661710 Bedfordshire Hanover Court Bedford MK40 2BW 01234 356355 Leighton Bedfordshire Hanover Court LU7 2QJ 01525 377212 Buzzard Bedfordshire Hanover Court Wootton MK43 9EQ 01234 768033 Bedfordshire Lavender Court Ampthill MK45 2BX 01525 841519 Bedfordshire Runnymede Court Luton LU3 3UZ 01582 490016 Leighton Bedfordshire St George's Court LU7 1BF 01525 378118 Buzzard Berkshire Bowes Lyon Close Windsor SL4 1TA 01753 830919 Berkshire Bridgeman Court Bridgeman Drive Windsor SL4 3SD 01753 863 221 County Name of location Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Postcode Telephone Berkshire Hanover Court Caversham RG4 6QR 0118 947 4338 Berkshire Hanover Gardens Bracknell RG12 7PD 01344 451699 Berkshire Hanover Mead Bray SL6 2AW 01628 632945 Berkshire Lambourn Court Walton Way Newbury RG14 2HS 01635 479 85 Berkshire
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Lodge, Sutton Park
    MIDLAND LODGE, SUTTON PARK A history of the building with details of its architecture, its association with two well-known tenants and the establishment of Sutton Coldfield’s Vesey Club in 1888. Roy Billingham Midland Lodge is a residential property situated within Sutton Park, designed by William Jenkins, a Birmingham architect, and built in 1880 for the Warden and Society of Sutton Coldfield. Following the Town’s incorporation in 1886, ownership passed to the new Corporation of Sutton Coldfield, and to Birmingham City Council in 1974 after Government reorganisation of local authority boundaries. The site of Midland Lodge (O.S. Grid Ref. SP 1121 9715) is adjacent to the Midland Gate entrance to Sutton Park at the western end of Midland Road which was constructed as a private road by the Midland Railway Company in 1879 to provide direct access for train passengers to and from the Park for their Sutton Park railway station. “New Lodge”, as the cottage was originally called, had several tenants prior to 1886 when Benjamin Stone, Sutton Coldfield’s first Mayor, took over the tenancy in order to meet the necessary residential qualifications to become a burgess of the Town. During his four years as Mayor, 1886-90, the lodge was known as “The Mayor’s Cottage” which he treated as his pied- à-terre, his own home being in Grange Lane, Erdington. After Stone terminated his tenancy in 1891 the cottage was referred to ever afterwards as “Midland Lodge”. Fig. 1(a) – Midland Lodge in c. 1910 Fig. 1(b) – Midland Lodge in February, 2014 Photograph by Benjamin Stone [Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham City Council Planning Committee 27 October 2016
    Birmingham City Council Planning Committee 27 October 2016 I submit for your consideration the attached reports for the South team. Recommendation Report No. Application No / Location / Proposal Defer – Informal Approval 8 2016/04804/PA 2A Frederick Road Selly Oak Birmingham B29 6PB Demolition of existing office building and erection of 48 bed student halls of residence with associated parking access and landscaping. Approve - Conditions 9 2016/07120/PA 113 Lordswood Road Winfield House Quinton Birmingham B17 9BH Demolition of existing building and erection of 7 no. residential dwellings with associated access improvements, landscaping and groundworks Determine 10 2016/05855/PA 262 Vicarage Road Kings Heath Birmingham B14 7NH Change of use from residential dwelling (Use Class C3) to HMO (Use Class Sui Generis) Approve - Conditions 11 2016/05861/PA 112 Southam Road Land at the rear of Hall Green Birmingham B28 0AD Erection of 1 detached dwelling house Page 1 of 2 Director of Planning and Regeneration Approve - Conditions 12 2016/06514/PA 68 Oxford Road Moseley Birmingham B13 9SQ Erection of two storey rear, single storey rear and single storey forward extensions and installation of dormer window to front Page 2 of 2 Director of Planning and Regeneration Committee Date: 27/10/2016 Application Number: 2016/04804/PA Accepted: 05/07/2016 Application Type: Full Planning Target Date: 31/10/2016 Ward: Selly Oak 2A Frederick Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham, B29 6PB Demolition of existing office building and erection of 48 bed student halls of residence with associated parking access and landscaping. Applicant: Markey Construction Unit Q1, Quadrant Distribution Centre, Quadrant Way, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 2RN Agent: BM3 Architecture Ltd 28 Pickford Street, Birmingham, B5 5QH Recommendation Approve Subject To A Section 106 Legal Agreement 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Oaks Ward Application Number Site Address Development
    Four Oaks Ward Application SCTC Number Site Address Development Description Resolution BCC Decision Erection of single storey forward & rear Woodstock 29a Hartopp Road extensions, first floor side & forward 2017/08856/PA Sutton Coldfield Birmingham B74 No Objection Refuse extensions, balcony to first floor rear elevation 2QR and installation of front gates and railings. 4 The Moorlands Sutton Coldfield 2017/09297/PA Erection of detached garage to front No Objection Refuse B74 2RF Trinity Ward Application SCTC Number Site Address Development Description Resolution BCC Decision Rear of 77-79 Maney Hill Road Application to determine the details of Part Sutton Coldfield Birmingham B72 condition no's 1 -7 (inclusive) attached to No Objection Approve/ 2017/05240/PA 1JS planning approval 2016/01667/PA Part Refuse Change of use from residential (Use Class C3) 62 Rectory Road Sutton Coldfield 2017/08743/PA to 8-bed HMO (House in Multiple Occupation) Objection Withdrawn Birmingham B75 7AS (Sui Generis) 46 Essex Road Sutton Coldfield Erection of two storey forward and rear and 2017/09173/PA Objection Approve Birmingham B75 6NS single storey rear extensions 22 Essex Road Four Oaks Sutton 2017/09048/PA Erection of two storey forward extension No Objection Refuse Coldfield West Midlands B75 6NS 85 Blakemore Drive Sutton Erection of two storey rear extension and 2017/09021/PA No Objection Refuse Coldfield Birmingham B75 7RW installation of dormer to rear 9 Lyndon Road Sutton Coldifeld B73 2017/09010/PA Erection of single storey rear extension No Objection Refuse 6BS Listed Building Consent for internal alterations 22 High Street Sutton Coldfield 2017/07743/PA to create 2 self-contained apartments and No Objection Refuse Birmingham B72 1UX alterations to shop front Change of use of ancillary upper floors 22 High Street Sutton Coldfield 2017/07683/PA residential accommodation to 2 self-contained No Objection Refuse Birmingham B72 1UX apartments and alterations to shop front The Marquee Lower Parade Sutton Creation of an additional storey to create 3no.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency and Contingency Plan 2019
    Wilson Stuart University College Birmingham Partnership Trust EMERGENCY AND CONTINGENCY PLAN VERSION CONTROL Issue Date: September 2019 Version: 2.0 Written By: Business Manager Agreed by The Board of Trustees CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2. DEFINITION ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. AIMS ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 4. EMERGENCY PRIORITY LEVELS ........................................................................................................................ 2 5. PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES .......................................................................................................................... 3 6. WHEN AN EMERGENCY OCCURS..................................................................................................................... 4 7. IMMEDIATE ACTION SHEET ............................................................................................................................. 5 8. INCIDENT LOG ................................................................................................................................................. 6 9. SUBSEQUENT ACTION SHEET .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Highways Minutes | Tues 7Th November 2017
    Planning and Highways Meeting Tuesday 7th November 2017 Sutton Coldfield Town Hall 7pm Present Cllrs D Allan (Chairman), L. Allen, Cairns, Griffin, Horrocks, Long, Perks & Puri. In Attendance Olive O’Sullivan - Town Clerk and Natalia Gorman - Administrative Officer. There were 4 members of the public and no press present. The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting and invited questions or comments from the public. Adam Hughes, a resident of Trinity Ward made an objection to planning application 2017/09173/PA, 46 Essex Road. Stating the proposed plan showed a lack of detail in respect of his own property, No 48, that the scale is not in keeping with area and that it would be intrusive to his property. Mr. Hughes suggested that there may also be an impact on existing trees on Essex Road and that the proposed extension would also have an impact on daylight, sunlight and would cause overshadowing and loss of privacy. Jill Turner, a New Hall resident made an objection to planning application 2017/08620/PA, 7 Oak Farm Close. Ms. Turner advised committee that the orangery has already been erected without planning permission, that it causes a loss of privacy to her garden, has an impact on daylight, sunlight & overshadowing and also the scale, mass and design is not in keeping with the area. Martin Pearce, a resident of Four Oaks ward asked for an update on driver feedback signs. The Chair advised Mr. Pearce that a meeting with Birmingham City Council to discuss the terms & conditions was successful and the Town Council has now received the revised costs for the signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations for Birmingham City Council
    Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and draft recommendations 5 Submissions received 5 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Warding patterns 7 Detailed wards 9 City centre and surrounding area 9 East of city centre 13 North of city centre 18 South-east of city centre 21 South-west of city centre 26 Sutton Coldfield 30 Conclusions 33 Parish electoral arrangements 33 3 Have your say 35 Appendices A Table A1: Draft recommendations for Birmingham City 37 Council B Submissions received 43 C Glossary and abbreviations 46 Summary Who we are The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) is an independent body set up by Parliament. We are not part of government or any political party. We are accountable to Parliament through a committee of MPs chaired by the Speaker of the House of Commons. Our main role is to carry out electoral reviews of local authorities throughout England. Electoral review An electoral review examines and proposes new electoral arrangements for a local authority. A local authority’s electoral arrangements decide: How many councillors are needed How many wards or electoral divisions should there be, where are their boundaries and what should they be called How many councillors should represent each ward or division Why Birmingham? We are conducting a review of Birmingham City Council following a recommendation by Sir Bob Kerslake (now Lord Kerslake) in his review of the governance and organisational capabilities of Birmingham City Council. That review followed on from concerns about the effectiveness of current operational arrangements in the Council. We subsequently agreed to undertake such a review, stimulated by Kerslake’s objective of improving effective and convenient local government in Birmingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham City Council Planning Committee 01 February 2018
    Birmingham City Council Planning Committee 01 February 2018 I submit for your consideration the attached reports for the South team. Recommendation Report No. Application No / Location / Proposal Defer – Informal Approval 8 2017/10086/PA Beechenhurst House 10 Serpentine Road Selly Oak Birmingham B29 7HU Minor material amendment attached to planning approval 2016/03063/PA to increase finished ground levels around the annex block by 500mm Page 1 of 1 Corporate Director, Economy Committee Date: 01/02/2018 Application Number: 2017/10086/PA Accepted: 27/11/2017 Application Type: Minor Material Amendment Target Date: 26/02/2018 Ward: Selly Oak Beechenhurst House, 10 Serpentine Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham, B29 7HU Minor material amendment attached to planning approval 2016/03063/PA to increase finished ground levels around the annex block by 500mm Applicant: Five Oaks Green Ltd c/o Agent Agent: Tyler Parkes 66 Stratford Road, Shirley, Solihull, West Midlands, B90 3LP Recommendation Approve Subject To A Section 106 Legal Agreement 1. Proposal 1.1. This proposal is for minor amendments to the approved scheme for the conversion of Beechenhurst House to student accommodation, which included a new-build, 3 storey (plus basement) annex block within the rear grounds. 1.2. The key amendment to the approved scheme comprises an increase to the finished ground levels around the proposed new annex building by 500mm; which in turn has no impact on the overall height of the building. However, increases the finished floor levels by 500mm; height and position of windows; the height of the stairwell which would protrude 500mm and reduced the depth of the parapet at roof level from 900mm to 400mm.
    [Show full text]
  • 24Th February 2021 No Application
    Four Oaks Ward 28th January- 24th February 2021 Application Date 21 days for No Number Site Address Development Description Registered comment 6 Farncote Drive and land r/o 38 & Demolition of existing 2021/01179/PA 40 Walsall Road bungalow and erection of 3 24/02/2021 17/03/2021 Sutton Coldfield no. detached dwellings 1 B74 4QS 1 Wentworth Road Erection of single storey 2021/00778/PA Four Oaks Sutton 24/02/2021 17/03/2021 rear extension ColdfieldB74 2SG 2 Installation of 1.8m high 41a Edge Hill Road vertical aluminium fence to Sutton Coldfield 2021/01164/PA front including electric 19/02/2021 12/03/2021 Birmingham B74 entrance gates and 4PD 3 alterations to driveway. Non-Material Amendment 6 Wyvern Road to approval 2019/09990/PA Sutton Coldfield 2021/00968/PA for change on the front 19/02/2021 12/03/2021 Birmingham B74 elevation to bricks of a 2PT similar material 4 15A Ladywood Road Four Oaks Erection of single storey 2021/01176/PA 18/02/2021 11/03/2021 Sutton Coldfield side orangery 5 B74 2SW 9 Hawkesford Close Erection of single storey 2021/01089/PA Sutton Coldfield 16/02/2021 09/03/2021 rear extension B74 2TR 6 29 Hartopp Road Erection single storey rear 2021/00481/PA Four Oaks Sutton 09/02/2021 02/03/2021 extension. Coldfield B74 2RE 7 Application to determine the details for condition numbers 3 (site assessment/remediation scheme), 4 (verification report), 5 (Ecological), 6 (hard and/or soft landscape), 7 (hard Land rear of 2-22 surfacing), 8 (boundary Clarence Road Four treatment), 9 (lighting Oaks Sutton 2020/07655/PA scheme),
    [Show full text]
  • 33 Tudor Hill Sutton Coldfield West Midlands
    33 TUDOR HILL SUTTON COLDFIELD WEST MIDLANDS B73 6BD A BEAUTIFUL EDWARDIAN GENTLEMAN’S RESIDENCE, PROVIDING A UNIQUE RE-DEVELOPMENT OR INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY IN WALKING DISTANCE OF SUTTON PARK, THE STATION AND TOWN CENTRE. Planned over three floors, and currently owner- Swallow Cottage: the conservatory out over the landscaped gardens occupied with additional income-producing • Reception hall and benefits from a feature fireplace with real flame accommodation to comprise six bedsits and • Living room fire. A separate family room with vaulted ceiling a detached two bedroom cottage. The annual • Kitchen showcasing exposed beams leads off the kitchen/ potential income currently exceeds £30,000. • Utility room breakfast room and has an aspect over the rear Alternatively, the property can be sold with vacant • Two double bedrooms gardens. possession. • Bathroom The kitchen/breakfast room is well appointed and fully The property lends itself to various commercial fitted with wall and floor cupboards including various Outside: uses (subject to the necessary planning consents). built in appliances and benefits from a separate utility • Detached double garage Alternatively, if retained and converted back to a room. • Large driveway gentleman’s residence • Extensive gardens with paved terrace The two ground floor double bedrooms could the property has the potential as an 8+ bedroom • Garden lodge be converted to provide additional family dwelling. • Further garden outbuildings accommodation if required or may prove useful Set over three floors the accommodation briefly if mobility is restricted due to the large bathroom Approximate gross internal floor area 6753 square foot comprises: adjacent to the bedroom accommodation. including garage and separate cottage.
    [Show full text]
  • Apt 4 Tudor Hill House, 11 Tudor Hill, Sutton Coldfield, B73 6Bd
    APT 4 TUDOR HILL HOUSE, 11 TUDOR HILL, SUTTON COLDFIELD, B73 6BD Apt 4 Tudor Hill House 11 Tudor Hill Sutton Coldfield B74 4HN Offers Invited Around £349,950 This attractive development of luxury apartments were built in 2007 and are set in a delightful tree lined location which is just a short walk from the tranquillity of Sutton Park or the hustle and bustle of Sutton Coldfield Town Centre. Apartment 4 is located on the ground floor with its own private entrance and offers three double bedrooms, two en-suites, main bathroom and an excellent size lounge/dining room with double French doors which open into a well-appointed breakfast kitchen with built in appliances. The apartment boas ts 1,548 sqft of accommodation which features a state of the art under floor heating system, heat recovery, ventilation system and integrated vacuum system. The apartment also benefits from designated parking spaces. Local Amenities Short distance from Sutton Train Station Sutton Town Centre Wyndley Leisure Centre 2400 acres of Parkland at Sutton Park Boldmere Golf Club Moor Hall Golf Club Birmingham City Centre Measurements are shown in metric with imperial in brackets: Ground Floor Accommodation Welcoming Reception Hall Guest Cloakroom Spacious Through Lounge/Dining Room 8.00 x 4.38 (26’3 x 14’4) Well Appointed Fitted Kitchen 4.36 x 2.59 (14’4 x 8’6) Master Bedroom 5.84 x 3.25 (19’2 x 10’8) Dressing Area En-suite Shower Room 2.46 x 2.44 (8’2 x 8’) Bedroom Two 5.055 x 2.56 (16’7 x 8’5) En-suite Shower Room 2.54 x 1.37 (8’4 x 4’6) Bedroom Three 5.05 x 2.89 (16’7 x 9’6) Main Luxury Bathroom 2.49 x 2.41 (8’2 x 7’11) Outside Communal gardens to the rear Allocated parking to the front.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Highways Minutes | Wed 5Th April 2017 Planning And
    Planning and Highways Meeting Wednesday 5th April 2017 Sutton Coldfield Town Hall 7pm Present Cllrs C Ives (Vice Chairman), L Allen, Horrocks, Passey (substitute for Cllr Allan), Perks and Pocock (substitute for Cllr Long), Puri and K Ward (substitute for Cllr Mackey). In Attendance Olive O’Sullivan - Acting Town Clerk, Mary Watkins - Administrative Assistant and Karl Randall – Birmingham City Council, Presenting Officer. There was one member of the public and no press present. The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting and invited questions or comments from the public. Martin Peers, a Four Oaks resident, asked the Committee to consider funding a ‘Driver Feedback Sign’ for the Four Oaks area to help tackle dangerous speeds and make the area much safer for pedestrians. 65 Apologies for Absence The Acting Town Clerk received apologies from Cllrs D Allan, Long and Mackey. Under item 4(v) of the Town Council Standing Orders, the Acting Town Clerk advised Committee that for this meeting Cllr Passey would be substituting, with voting rights, for Cllr Allan, Cllr Pocock would be substituting, with voting rights, for Cllr Long and Cllr K Ward would be substituting for Cllr Mackey. Resolved that the apologies and substitutions for this meeting be noted. 66 Declarations of Interest Cllr Perks declared on non-pecuniary interest in planning application 2017/01827/PA under item 73 (i) as the owner of the property sits with him as a Magistrate. 67 Minutes of Last Meeting Resolved that the minutes of the meeting of Planning & Highways Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 7th March 2017 be signed as a true record of the meeting.
    [Show full text]