Ernestine L. Rose: Freethinking Rebel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ernestine L. Rose: Freethinking Rebel GREAT MINDS sion and reinforcement, uplifted by the energy and excitement of shared belief. Ernestine L. Rose: Beginning in 1850, Rose helped orga- nize the national women’s rights conven- tions that were held yearly after the 1848 Seneca Falls meeting. As the women’s Freethinking Rebel rights movement grew, in part because of the great success of her speeches at the yearly conventions, Rose became one Carol Kolmerten of the most important speakers in the movement and the one the newspapers labeled as “the most eloquent.” he editor of a small Maine news- Despite her importance, Rose is per- paper wrote “It would be shame- haps the most forgotten of the women’s T ful to listen to this woman, a thousand times below a prostitute.” A minister in Charleston, South Carolina, Ernestine L. Rose forbade his congregation to heed “this 1810–1892 female devil.” The object of this scorn was Ernestine L. Rose, one of the major Background Born Ernestine Potowski, daughter of an Orthodox intellectual forces behind then women’s rabbi in the ghetto of Piotrkow, Poland. Rebellious rights movement in nineteenth-century since age five, she rejected Judaism, left home, America. traveled, and, in England, became an advocate of The Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University Robert Owen’s socialism. Emigrating to the United Rose spent more than four decades States in 1836 with her husband, jeweler William arguing for women’s rights and against Rose, she quickly emerged as a fiery freethought, legal and social restrictions on women. women’s rights, and abolition lecturer. vate property and organized religion and Born in Poland in 1810 of Jewish parents, Achievement the importance of education, freethought, Rose was one of the earliest women to give public Rose chafed at her father’s religion at an and women’s rights. Her first and most lectures in the United States, following Frances early age. Leaving home at seventeen, she (Fanny) Wright (1795–1852). Despite her Polish important early platform was close to first traveled to Berlin, where she is reput- accent and relentless manner, Rose became a home—the annual New York City Thomas marquee speaker who helped draw thousands ed to have invented a chemical paper to Paine birthday celebration. There, amidst to women’s rights, antislavery, and freethought perfume apartments (“Cologne waters”), her freethinking friends, Rose joined the events. Throughout her public life she espoused a then sailed to England. In England Rose consistent platform of atheism, freedom of thought, men every January 29, making toasts quickly became enamored with the ideas of equal rights for women, and the abolition of slavery. and giving speeches on the “superstition” Notable Work socialist Robert Owen. At an Owenite meet- inherent in Chris tianity. In 1853, she was Rose is known to history primarily as a speaker on ing she met her future husband, William the women’s suffrage and antislavery movements. selected president of the New York Paine Rose, and together they came to the New One of her freethought speeches, “A Defense of Society, a first-ever accomplishment for a Atheism,” was preserved in pamphlet form by World in May of 1836 as reformers. woman in any Paine group. Boston freethought publisher J.P. Mendum. Within months, Ernestine Rose had Accolades By the early 1850s, Rose was increas - begun speaking to groups of New Yorkers Returning to England in 1869, Rose was befriend- ingly dedicated to the intertwined issues about “Mr. Owen’s system,” while her ed by leading British freethinkers. Atheist Charles of women’s rights and free thought. She Bradlaugh and freethinking cleric Moncure husband opened a jewelry repair shop to believed, as Robert Owen had before Conway spoke at her husband’s funeral in help support her speaking efforts. Rose’s 1882. She became close to Bradlaugh’s daugh- her—until he converted to Christian first cause during her first winter in New ter and biographer, Hypatia Bradlaugh Bonner. mysticism in his old age—that the devel- Freethought firebrand George Jacob Holyoake York City was the Married Woman’s opment of organized religion and the spoke at Rose’s graveside ten years later. Property Act—she gathered signatures to Fitting Epitaph capitalist economic system were the pass legislation that would allow married “But for the fact that such genuine reformers are major causes of women’s inferior sta- never suitably appreciated in their days and gen- women to retain their property after mar- tus. But Rose, unlike Owen, understood eration, she would now be the most popular, as riage. At a time when almost no woman from the context of her life how a simple she has long been the best, female lecturer in the spoke in public, Rose spent her first United States.” —Rabbi Jonas Bondi, May 1869 change of economic systems would not decade in the United States writing and Note alone liberate women. Women needed, Annie Laurie Gaylor, ed. Women Without Super- lecturing throughout the country on tra- she believed, to work together in con- stition (Madison, Wis.: FFRF Inc., 1997), pp. ditional Owenite concerns: the evil of pri- 63–72. certed and unified action. They needed Carol Kolmerten is a professor of a gathering much like the Paine cele- English at Hood College, in Fred erick, brations, a unifying space, as it were, Maryland. Her biography of Ernestine that would provide them with the moral Rose, The American Life of Ernestine L. equivalent of evangelical rivals. Isolated Rose, is now available from Syracuse women could come together for conver- University Press. 53 http://www.secularhumanism.org summer 2002 rights activists; today virtually no one sional men who were out for individual on immigrants’ rights—when Rose sud- knows her name. She is, to use Virginia gain to the detriment of societal benefit. denly told Anthony that she had heard Woolf’s words, “a stranded ghost.” Her The only professional Rose did not lam- her friend, women’s rights activist Lucy disappearance from history is telling: not baste was the schoolmaster, a figure that Stone, express prejudice against grant- only was she scorned by newspaper edi- typically was the subject of ridicule. ing to foreigners the rights of citizen- tors and Southern ministers, but she also The morning before Rose’s final talk, ship. It was a subject that Rose, who was isolated from and sometimes ignored the two women attended the Baltimore was not yet a citizen, felt strongly about. by the very women and men with whom Universalist Church to hear a sermon Anthony, unable to believe any- she shared reform platforms. Rose was on “Woman’s Sphere,” where they thing bad about Lucy Stone,1 expressed an “other” in a movement of others—an heard that women should have rights disbelief that she would say such a outsider in a group of women who banded but should not have equal rights with thing. Rose countered by saying that together against oppression. She looked men. The morning sermon influenced Anthony was blinded by “that clique of and sounded different from the other Rose’s evening talk in the Committee Abolitionists.” Anthony felt compelled women: she spoke with a foreign accent; Room of the Maryland Institute, where to defend Stone, asking Rose “Is there she was outspoken; she was ironic. she spoke of “Charity,” or rather the not one in the Reform ranks, whom you Even more significant, Rose was a lack of it as expressed in sectarian- think true, not one but whom panders to professed freethinker. In a movement ism and in the “monstrous cruelties” the popular feeling?” that drew much of its moral and intel- perpetrated by dogmatic clergymen. Rose answered that she could not lectual energy from appeals to Christian Rose ended her speech by reviewing the help it: “I take them by the words of piety, the combination of Rose’s athe- morning’s sermon and then imploring their own mouths. I trust all until their ism, her Jewish and Polish background, her listeners to ensure that there could own words or acts declare them false her foreign accent, and her outspoken never be a time again when “priestly to truth and right.” Yet, such forthright ways made her an obvious target for bloodhounds” would have permission words caused anguish for Rose. She antagonistic newspaper editors and to “hunt down and mercilessly butcher tried to explain her misery to Anthony: ministers who wanted to prove how those who may simply differ from them “No one can tell the hours of anguish radical and wrongheaded the women’s in opinion.” Anthony called her speech I have suffered, as one after another I rights movement was. But the blunt a “glorious” one and was immensely have seen those whom I had trusted, daughter of Eastern European culture pleased that, even though the hall seat- betray falsity of motive as I have been also caused discomfort and unease for ed about five hundred people, hundreds compelled to place one after another on those within the movement. Rose acted were unable to get in because all the the list of panderers to public favor.” as a kind of barometer for the reformers; seats were sold. Ten years younger and far less cyn- she registered their anti-Semitism, their Local papers noted Rose’s power- ical, Anthony responded: “Do you know anti-immigrationist sentiment, and their ful oratorical style. The Baltimore Mrs. Rose, that I can but feel that you unconscious racism. Rose’s story is thus Repub lican and Argus praised “Mrs. place me too on that list.” Rose hesitat- a story outside the standard narrative of Rose’s Lecture” as “forcible, nay truly ed, implying that Anthony was correct.
Recommended publications
  • The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American
    The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American Culture, 1830-1900 Ana Lucette Stevenson BComm (dist.), BA (HonsI) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics I Abstract During the 1830s, Sarah Grimké, the abolitionist and women’s rights reformer from South Carolina, stated: “It was when my soul was deeply moved at the wrongs of the slave that I first perceived distinctly the subject condition of women.” This rhetorical comparison between women and slaves – the woman-slave analogy – emerged in Europe during the seventeenth century, but gained peculiar significance in the United States during the nineteenth century. This rhetoric was inspired by the Revolutionary Era language of liberty versus tyranny, and discourses of slavery gained prominence in the reform culture that was dominated by the American antislavery movement and shared among the sisterhood of reforms. The woman-slave analogy functioned on the idea that the position of women was no better – nor any freer – than slaves. It was used to critique the exclusion of women from a national body politic based on the concept that “all men are created equal.” From the 1830s onwards, this analogy came to permeate the rhetorical practices of social reformers, especially those involved in the antislavery, women’s rights, dress reform, suffrage and labour movements. Sarah’s sister, Angelina, asked: “Can you not see that women could do, and would do a hundred times more for the slave if she were not fettered?” My thesis explores manifestations of the woman-slave analogy through the themes of marriage, fashion, politics, labour, and sex.
    [Show full text]
  • The 19Th Amendment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Women Making History: The 19th Amendment Women The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. —19th Amendment to the United States Constitution In 1920, after decades of tireless activism by countless determined suffragists, American women were finally guaranteed the right to vote. The year 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment. It was ratified by the states on August 18, 1920 and certified as an amendment to the US Constitution on August 26, 1920. Developed in partnership with the National Park Service, this publication weaves together multiple stories about the quest for women’s suffrage across the country, including those who opposed it, the role of allies and other civil rights movements, who was left behind, and how the battle differed in communities across the United States. Explore the complex history and pivotal moments that led to ratification of the 19th Amendment as well as the places where that history happened and its continued impact today. 0-31857-0 Cover Barcode-Arial.pdf 1 2/17/20 1:58 PM $14.95 ISBN 978-1-68184-267-7 51495 9 781681 842677 The National Park Service is a bureau within the Department Front cover: League of Women Voters poster, 1920. of the Interior. It preserves unimpaired the natural and Back cover: Mary B. Talbert, ca. 1901. cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this work future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • PIONEERS of WOMEN’S RIGHTS in MANHATTAN Gale A
    A WALKING TOUR PIONEERS OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN MANHATTAN Gale A. Brewer MANHATTAN BOROUGH PRESIDENT Brewer_WomensHistory_Final.indd 1 2/25/20 4:08 PM One Hundred Years of Voting A century has passed since American suffragists girded for their final push to win the ballot for women in every corner of the United States. Under the skilled and persistent direction of Carrie Chapman Catt, and spurred by the energy of Alice Paul’s National Woman Party, the 19th Amendment won approval on August 26, 1920. In this pamphlet, we find reminders of the struggles and achievements of New York women who spoke, marched, and even fought for the vote and the full panoply of rights. These were women who marched to Albany in the winter, or demonstrators who were jailed for their protests in Washington. Crystal Eastman, a young activist, spoke a large truth when she said, after ratification, “Now we can begin.” To complete one task is to encounter the next. Indeed, even after a hundred years we must still seek to complete the work of attaining women’s equality. Sincerely, Gale A. Brewer, Manhattan Borough President Brewer_WomensHistory_Final.indd 2 2/25/20 4:08 PM Sojourner Truth Preacher for Abolition and Suffrage Old John Street Chapel 1 Sojourner Truth was born Isabella Baumgold and lived as a Dutch-speaking slave in upstate New York. With difficulty, she won her freedom, moved to New York City, and joined the Methodist Church on John Street. She then changed her name to Sojourner Truth and spent the rest of her long life speaking against slavery and for women’s rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Woman's Rights Claims Concerning Wives' Household Labor, 1850-1880
    Articles Home As Work: The First Woman's Rights Claims Concerning Wives' Household Labor, 1850-1880 Reva B. Siegelt CONTENTS INTRODUCnION .............................................. 1075 I. GENESIS OF A RIGHTS DISCOURSE .............................. 1081 A. The Law of MaritalProperty in the Antebellum Era .............. 1082 B. Women's Household Labor in the Antebellum Era ................ 1086 C. Ideological Sources of Joint Property Advocacy ................. 1091 1. Utopian Communitarianism ............................ 1094 2. Abolitionism and PoliticalAntislavery .................... 1098 t Acting Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley; Visiting Professor of Law, Yale Law School, 1993-94. B.A., 1978, M.Phil. 1982, J.D. 1986, Yale University. This Article is dedicated to Hannah, Anna, and Eve, as well as to "Pen-Holder" and all the rest of "my ladies," whose voices I have tried to make audible in these pages. I owe deep thanks to the many friends and colleagues who helped me with the manuscript along the way: Hugh Baxter, Mary Becker, Nancy Cott, Ira Ellman, Thomas Ferraro, William Fletcher, Gillian Hadfield, Hendrick Hartog, Herma Hill Kay, Christine Littleton, Kristin Luker, Martha Minow, Andrea Peterson, Robert Post, Derick Schilling, Harry Scheiber, Maijorie Shultz, Joan Williams, and workshop participants at the Yale Law School and the University of Chicago Law School. Special thanks go to Ann Lucas, Rebecca Schleifer, Laura Schlichtmann, and Peggie Smith for their research assistance, to my editor, Jonathan Weissglass, to Kristin Largent-Moyes for all kinds of help with "HAW," and to Boalt Hall and the Center for the Study of Law and Society for financial support so generously provided. 1073 1074 The Yale Law Journal [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Worcester Womens Rights Convention
    THE WORCESTER WOMENS RIGHTS CONVENTION OF 1850: A SOCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE RANK AND FILE MEMBERSHIP By HOLLY N. BROWN Bachelor of Arts University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 1994 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTERS OF ARTS May, 1997 THE WORCESTER WOMENS RIGHTS CONVENTION OF 1850: A SOCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE RANK AND FILE MEMBERSHIP Thesis Approved: . ~ 1t1'J~ cd ~~ Dean of the Graduate College 11 PREFACE This study analyzed the membership of the Worcester Women's Rights Convention of 1850, to compare the major characteristics of this group to the general population of Worcester, Massachusetts in 1850. The members of the convention were urban, white, Protestant and different from the general population. The city of Worcester's population was much more diverse. Within the membership group it was found that they were not all of the same socio-economic background. By dividing the one group into three categories--antislavery organizers, women, and men--the study found that there were working class as well as upper and middle class individuals at the convention. The class diversity occurred almost wholly among women. The bulk of the research of this study was conducted at the American Antiquarian Society in Worcester, Massachusetts. Sources were also located at the Worcester Historical Museum and the Worcester Room at the Worcester Public Library. 111 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincere appreciation to my major advisor, Dr. James Huston for his intelligent supervision, constructive guidance, and for his time and effort in my education on quantification.
    [Show full text]
  • First 7Ree Volumes; and Indicate the Geographic and Institutional Diversity of Womenss Studies
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 137 144 SO 009 609 AUTHOR Rosenfelt, Deborah Silverton, Ed. TITLE Going Strong: New Courses/New Programs. Female Studies VII. INSTITUTION State Univ. of New York, Old Westbury. Coll. at Old Westbury. Feminist Press. PUB DATE 73 NOTE 258p.; For related documents, see SO 009 608-611 AVAILABLE FROMThe Feminist Press, Box 334, Old Westbury, New York 11568 ($5.00) EDES PRICE EF-$0.83 Plus Postage. HC Not Availablo from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Art Education; *College Curriculum; *Course Descriptions; Curriculum Guides; Developing Nations; Education; Females; Higher Education; Humanities Instruction; Interdisciplinary Approach; Journalism; Legal Education; Literature; Non Western Civilization; S1/41cial Sciences; Social Work;. Speech;. Theological Education; *Womens Studies IDENTIFIERS Third Worad ABSTRACT The fourth volume in a series, this publication describes new college courses and programs in women's studiesas of November, 1973. The author selected courses whichare innovative; provide significant assistance through organization, bibliography,or project suggestions to women developing their own courses in the area; extend rather than repeat material already, available in the first 7ree volumes; and indicate the geographic and institutional diversity of womenss studies. Coarse descriptionson Third World women in non-Western societies are included. Following a brief intro6,3tion, the book outlines courses in female studies in the following areas: interdisciplinary courses; humanities and arts; classics; history; literature; philosophy;
    [Show full text]
  • AVAILABLE Fromnational Women's History Week Project, Women's Support Network, Inc., P.O
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 233 918 SO 014 593 TITLE Women's History Lesson Plan Sets. INSTITUTION Women's Support Network, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA. SPONS AGENCY Women's Educational Equity Act Program (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 83 NOTE 52p.; Prepared by the National Women's History Week Project. Marginally legible becalr,:e of colored pages and small print type. AVAILABLE FROMNational Women's History Week Project, Women's Support Network, Inc., P.O. Box 3716, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 ($8.00). PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; *Art Educatien; Audiovisual Aids; Books; Elementary Secondary Education; *English Instruction; *Females; *Interdisciplinary Approach; Learning Activities; Lesson Plans; Models; Resource Materials; Sex Role; *United States History; *Womens Studies IDENTIFIERS Chronology; National Womens History Week Project ABSTRACT The materials offer concrete examples of how women contributed to U.S. history during three time periods: 1763-1786; 1835-1860; and 1907-1930. They can be used as the basis for an interdisciplinary K-12 program in social studies, English, and art. There are three major sections to the guide. The first section suggests lesson plans for each of the time periods under study. Lesson plans contain many varied learning activities. For example, students read and discuss books, view films, do library research, sing songs, study the art of quilt making, write journal entries of an imaginary trip west as young women, write speeches, and research the art of North American women. The second section contains a chronology outlining women's contributions to various events.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Guide
    The National American Woman Suffrage Association 1890 (NAWSA) MUNUC 33 ONLINE1 The National American Woman Suffrage Association 1890 (NAWSA)| MUNUC 33 Online TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ A NOTE ON INTERSECTIONALITY FROM THE DAIS………...……….………3 CHAIR LETTERS………………………….….…………………..…….…….....…5 COMMITTEE STRUCTURE.……………..………………………………………..9 TOPIC A: ORGANIZING THE WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT……….14 Statement of the Problem……………….……………..………….…14 History of the Problem………………………………………………….26 Roster……………………………………………………………………..30 Bibliography……………………………………………………………..66 2 The National American Woman Suffrage Association 1890 (NAWSA)| MUNUC 33 Online A NOTE ON INTERSECTIONALITY FROM THE DAIS ____________________________________________________ Dear Delegates, Welcome to the National American Woman’s Suffrage Association - where you will spend your weekend writing and voting on policy that will advance gender equality and grant women the rights that they deserve. We hope this committee will provoke conversations, creativity, and a hard (and even critical) look at the movement that led to the enfranchisement of the largest group of voters at a single time. Our goal with running this committee is to teach you about how to organize and run a political movement. However, we also want you to understand and critique how political movements have worked in the past. In order to do this, we must confront both the parts of our history that are commendable and inspiring, as well as the parts of our history in which people were discriminatory or acted in a manner that we would not support today. The history we will be discussing is not faultless, and deals with racist, antisemitic, and homophobic actors both outside and within the suffrage movement. Some of you have been assigned characters who hold problematic, prejudiced beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Petticoats of Steel
    Directed by Margaret E. Hall FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: MARGARET E. HALL AARON MARQUISE Associate Artistic Director Arts Education Manager [email protected] [email protected] 518.462.4531 x410 518.382.3884 x128 1 Table of Contents Capital Repertory Theatre’s 36th Season - 2016-2017 LOBBY HERO by Kenneth Lonergan 3 A Letter from our Education Department SEPT 29 – OCT 20, 2019 4 About Us 5 Attending a Performance IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE 6 About the Script/Characters Live from the WVL Radio Theatre 7 Historical Context: A Timeline Adapted by WVR Repoley from the motion 12 The Women of Petticoats of Steel picture by Frank Capra 16 Vocabulary NOV 22 – DEC 22, 2019 17 The Documents 26 Who’s Who: In The Production YOUR BEST ONE by Meridith Friedman 27 About the Playwrights East Coast Premiere 28 Ideas for Curriculum Integration JAN 17 – FEB 09, 2020 31 Resources Consulted 32 Teacher Evaluation THE IRISH AND HOW THEY GOT THAT WAY 33 theREP’s Mission In Action By Frank McCourt, featuring the music of Ireland *This study guide is an updated replica of MAR 06 – APRIL 05, 2020 theREP’s study guide from the 2017 Tour. SISTER ACT Music by Alan Menken, Lyrics by Glenn Slater, Book by Cheri and Bill Steinkellner Based on the Touchstone Pictures Motion Picture, SISTER ACT, written by Joseph HoWard theREP’s ON-THE-GO! IN-SCHOOL TOURS We come to YOU! To book a tour, contact Aaron Marquise at [email protected] | 518-382-3884 x128 Tour Dates Tour Dates Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long History of the Battle for Women's Suffrage
    The Long History of the Battle for Women’s Suffrage The Age-Old Absence of Rights for Women The compelling need by women throughout the world to secure rights – over their lives, their children, their bodies, their property - has burned for centuries. In America it was not only regarding voting that women were disadvantaged. The absence of women’s rights – long before women’s suffrage – was cruelly obvious. A woman’s property became her husband’s upon marriage, and women were only gradually allowed to act as independent agents in legal contexts on a state-by-state basis after 1839. American women, until well into the 20th century, could not sue for divorce or gain legal custody of their children if their husbands divorced them or died. Age, sex and wage discrimination in the workplace was legal, and widely practiced. Few laws gave women any right to their earnings or inheritance and even fewer laws addressed physical abuses that women suffered at the hands of their husbands. The U.S. followed English Common Law: “The husband and wife are one, and that one is the husband.” Where is the “Right” in “Right to Vote”? Isn’t the “right to vote” one of our most fundamental constitutional rights? In fact, it is not. Neither the original Constitution nor the Bill of Rights expressly guarantees the right to vote. Until the 15th Amendment passed in 1870, granting the vote to all African American men, each state decided who could vote. Only in the 1960s, when the Supreme Court concluded that the 14th Amendment implicitly protected the right to vote, did voting come to be regarded as a fundamental federal constitutional right.
    [Show full text]
  • Dedication Planned for New National Suffrage Memorial
    Equality Day is August 26 March is Women's History Month NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY ALLIANCE Women Win the Vote Before1920 Celebrating the Centennial of Women's Suffrage 1920 & Beyond You're Invited! Celebrate the 100th Anniversary of Women’s Right to Vote Learn What’s Happening in Your State and Online HROUGHOUT 2020, Americans will celebrate the Tcentennial of the extension of the right to vote to women. When Congress passed the 19th Amendment in 1919, and 36 states ratified it by August 1920, women’s right to vote was enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Now there are local, state and national centennial celebrations in the works including shows and © Trevor Stamp © Trevor parades, parties and plays, films The Women’s Suffrage Centennial float in the Rose Parade in Pasadena, California, was seen by millions on January 1, 2020. On the float were the and performers, teas and more. descendants of suffragists including Ida B. Wells, Susan B. Anthony, Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglass and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Ten rows of Learn more, get involved, enjoy the ten women in white followed, waving to the crowd. Trevor Stamp photo. activities, and recognize as never before that women’s hard fought Dedication Planned for New achievements are an important part of American history. National Suffrage Memorial HE TURNING POINT Suffra- were jailed over 100 years ago. This gist Memorial, a permanent marked a critical turning point in suffrage Inside This Issue: tribute to the American women’s history. Great Resources T © Robert Beach suffrage movement, will be unveiled on Spread over an acre, the park-like A rendering of the Memorial August 26, 2020 in Lorton, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • The National American Woman Suffrage Association 1890 (NAWSA) MUNUC 33 1 the National American Woman Suffrage Association 1890 (NAWSA)| MUNUC 33
    The National American Woman Suffrage Association 1890 (NAWSA) MUNUC 33 1 The National American Woman Suffrage Association 1890 (NAWSA)| MUNUC 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ A NOTE ON INTERSECTIONALITY FROM THE DAIS………...……….………3 CHAIR LETTERS………………………….….…………………..…….…….....…5 COMMITTEE STRUCTURE.……………..………………………………………..9 TOPIC A: ORGANIZING THE WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT……….14 Statement of the Problem……………….……………..………….…14 History of the Problem………………………………………………….26 Roster……………………………………………………………………..30 Bibliography……………………………………………………………..66 2 The National American Woman Suffrage Association 1890 (NAWSA)| MUNUC 33 A NOTE ON INTERSECTIONALITY FROM THE DAIS ____________________________________________________ Dear Delegates, Welcome to the National American Woman’s Suffrage Association - where you will spend your weekend writing and voting on policy that will advance gender equality and grant women the rights that they deserve. We hope this committee will provoke conversations, creativity, and a hard (and even critical) look at the movement that led to the enfranchisement of the largest group of voters at a single time. Our goal with running this committee is to teach you about how to organize and run a political movement. However, we also want you to understand and critique how political movements have worked in the past. In order to do this, we must confront both the parts of our history that are commendable and inspiring, as well as the parts of our history in which people were discriminatory or acted in a manner that we would not support today. The history we will be discussing is not faultless, and deals with racist, antisemitic, and homophobic actors both outside and within the suffrage movement. Some of you have been assigned characters who hold problematic, prejudiced beliefs.
    [Show full text]