DOCSLIB.ORG

Army Reserve and National Guard Support to Intelligence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Army Reserve and National Guard Support to Intelligence Subscriptions: Free unit subscriptions are available by emailing the Editor at [email protected]. Include the complete mailing address (unit name, street address, and building number) and the number of copies per issue. Don’t forget to email the Editor when your unit moves, deploys, or redeploys to insure continual receipt of the Bulletin. Reprints: Material in this Bulletin in not copyrighted (except where indicated). Content may be reprinted if the MI Professional Bulletin and the authors are credited. Our mailing address: MIPB, USAICoE, Box 2001, Bldg. 51005, Ft. Huachuca, AZ, 85613 Issue photographs and graphics: Courtesy of the U.S. Army and issue authors. Commanding General Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence MG Scott D. Berrier publishes the Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin (MIPB) quarterly under the provisions of AR 25-30. MIPB Chief of Staff presents information designed to keep intelligence profes- COL Todd A. Berry sionals informed of current and emerging developments Chief Warrant Officer, MI Corps within the field and provides an open forum in which ideas; CW5 Matthew R. Martin concepts; tactics, techniques, and procedures; historical per- spectives; problems and solutions, etc., can be exchanged Command Sergeant Major, MI Corps and discussed for purposes of professional development. CSM Thomas J. Latter Disclaimer: Views expressed are those of the authors and STAFF: not those of the Department of Defense or its elements. The contents do not necessarily reflect official U.S. Army Editor positions and do not change or supersede information in any Sterilla A. Smith other U.S. Army publications. [email protected] By order of the Secretary of the Army: Design and Layout MARK A. MILLEY Gary V. Morris General, United States Army Chief of Staff Cover Design Gary V. Morris Official: Military Staff GERALD B. O’KEEFE MAJ Derek L. Tureson Administrative Assistant to the to the Secretary of the Army 1521902 From The Editor As a reminder, MIPB is now online at IKN on the open front page at https://www.ikn.army.mil/apps/IKNWMS/Default. aspx?webId=2248. You will find several of the most recent issues there as well. For earlier issues (2013 and earlier) please go to the MIPB site on IKN after you CAC in. The following themes and suspenses are established for: October-December, Intelligence Support to Situational Understanding in 2025 and Beyond, Please contact the editor. January-March, Institutional Training, deadline for submissions is December 11. April-June, Considerations for Separate Brigades Intelligence Teams, deadline for submissions is 3 March 2016. July-September, How to Fight Intel through all Phases of Operations, deadline for submissions is 10 June 2016. Articles from the field will always be very important to the success of MIPB as a professional bulletin. Please continue to submit them. Even though the topic of your article may not coincide with an issue’s theme do not hesitate to send it to me. Most issues will contain theme articles as well as articles on other topics. Your thoughts and lessons learned (from the field) are invaluable. Please call or email me with any questions regarding your article or upcoming issues. Sterilla Smith Editor 19 July - September 2014 PB 34-15-3 Volume 41 Number 3 35 FEATURES 6 38 Days: Maximizing the Military Intelligence Readiness Command by Colonel Stephen E. Zarbo 10 USNORTHCOM’s RC Military Intelligence Brigade by Captain Glenn Draughon, MIRC G3/5 Future Plans 11 Taking MI Professionals from “Provide, Trained, and Ready” to “Provide an Operational MI Army Reserve” by Major Ernesto Clark 15 The Evolution of MI in the Army Reserve: An Informal and Unofficial Historical Summary by Colonel Gregory K. Williams, (USA, Retired) 19 INSCOM Reserve Component Support and Integration by Major Donya Dugan, Deputy Chief, Reserve Programs Office; Captain LaTonya Hama, Operations Officer; and Major Jason Elphick, NG Liaison 22 Maximizing Reserve Component Intelligence Support by Colonel Steve G. Stevens, Army National Guard 27 The Federated Intelligence Program at the State Level by Captain Timothy Kirschner and Major Brian McGarry 30 Intelligence Missions and Realistic Training Boost Readiness and Retention for MI Soldiers of the IL ARNG by Captain Craig M. Robbins and Lieutenant Colonel Douglas M. Masters 32 Language and Culture Training for the Traditional Drilling Linguist by Sergeant Thomas McLaughlin, Sergeant Elizabeth Stegeman, and Major Brian McGarry 35 Training the Reserve Component HUMINT Force by First Lieutenant Joseph Hardin, First Lieutenant David Wachtveitl, and Major Brian McGarry 39 Living the ARNG Culture of “No Cold Starts” by Lieutenant Colonel David M. Church 45 Winning Warfighter: The Intelligence Enterprise by Lieutenant Colonel Jack R. East and Major Oliver G. Wells 51 Developing an Open Source Intelligence “Battle Rhythm” - Meeting the Challenge of Maintaining Situational Understanding in a Complex World by Colonel Kevin C. Wulfhorst 56 The MI Effort to Maintain Individual and Unit Readiness: Reserve and National Guard Challenges by Sergeant Major Brian R. Hale and Lieutenant Colonel (Ret.) Kimberly A. Swasey 60 Intelligence Challenges in Eastern Afghanistan (Part 2) by Lieutenant Colonel Jim Reed, Major Ken Wright, and Chief Warrant Officer Five Erin O’Hara 65 Things I Wish I Had Done Before Going To NTC by Major James King 76 The MI Soldier Heritage Learning Center by Ruth Quinn DEPARTMENTS 2 Always Out Front 64 Contact and Article Submission 4 CSM Forum 68 MI Corps 2015 Hall of Fame Inductees 5 Technical Perspective 79 Professional Reader Inside Back Cover: 2015 LTG Sidney T. Weinstein Award Always Out Front by Major General Scott D. Berrier Commanding General U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence The United States Army of 2015 remains the most powerful Army readiness starts with intelligence readiness and in- and professional Army in the world. A Total Force assem- telligence readiness starts at Fort Huachuca. As Military bled of Active, Reserve, and National Guard professionals Intelligence Professionals, we must remain vigilant in ex- founded on the hard work and dedication of our Soldiers, amining the future. Our goals are not merely to predict our incredible civilians, and families. Throughout our 240 the future, but to describe the future and design an intel- years, all three components of the Army secured our Nation ligence strategy to build capability to win. Leveraging the by preventing conflict and, when necessary, winning its Army’s intelligence Total Force and balancing resources and wars. We are successful because we are well trained, well capabilities across the Active Component, Army National educated, well led, and dedicated to our Profession and our Guard, and Army Reserve are vital to remaining ready to country. We are the strength of our Nation and continue to “Win in a Complex World.” As stated by the Army Chief of serve with distinction and honor and have rightfully earned Staff General Mark A. Milley, “In order for the Army to win, the title, “Trusted Professionals.” it must integrate the Guard and Reserve. Today, the Army is implementing its Total Force Policy, integrating all three Whether on the battlefields of Western Europe, the jun- components, particularly in training and relationship build- gles of Vietnam, or the deserts of Iraq, our Total Force ing. The Guard and Reserve are part of the Army’s regionally has stood ready to defend the Nation. As we examine the aligned forces effort, supporting theater security coopera- emerging operational environment, the world has become tion activities around the world. The United States Army incredibly more complex, unknown, and constantly chang- cannot execute operations anywhere without the Guard ing. In order for our Army and our MI Professionals to retain and Reserve.” our edge, we must not only meet, but exceed the demands Standardization of training, whether at Fort Huachuca, posed by ever- changing threats and environments. Utah, or Georgia, training Soldiers, NCOs, warrant officers It has become increasingly difficult to predict who we will and officers from across all three components, is crucial to fight, where we will fight, and what coalition we will partner mission success. Training that is responsive to the needs of with in the future. The Army Operating Concept states, “we the Total Force, regardless of component, must be designed must anticipate changing conditions to ensure that Army to provide relevant and realistic institutional training for forces are manned, trained, and equipped to overmatch our warfighters. We must continue to improve the integra- enemies in order to seize, retain, and exploit the initiative tion of active and reserve training systems by standardiz- and we must assess our efforts continuously and be pre- ing training, leveraging resources, and incorporating lessons pared to adapt to unexpected opportunities and unantici- learned from over a decade of conflict. pated dangers. Our Army must continuously learn, adapt, After 14 years of war, significant budgetary pressures, and and innovate.” In order for our MI Professionals to antici- an increasingly complex security environment, the Army pate changes and adapt to unexpected opportunities, our is building on its long history of success, adaptation, and Total Force must maintain its readiness and operational strong leadership to change and evolve. A key component relevancy. We must remain globally engaged and take full of this change is the sustainment of symbiotic relationships advantage of training tools and opportunities despite pro- among the Active, Guard, and Reserve forces to help create jected force reductions and diminishing resources. Our pri- opportunities by getting the right units to the right place at mary tasks across all components are to keep our Army the right time. intelligence force in the fight with the best trained, multi- We recognize today that by engaging regionally we have disciplined intelligence force to enable decisive action, and an opportunity to shape the battlefields of tomorrow.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Contamination at U.S. Military Bases in South Korea And
    Copyright © 2010 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120. .S . military forces have been stationed in South Environmental Korea for more than 50 years . Recently, after a decade-long consultation, the two nations agreed to Uintegrate the U .S . forces in a new, concentrated site to accom- Contamination at modate the newly developed military goals of the force . In 2007, the U .S . government returned 31 out of 66 military sites designated to be returned to South Korea . On 23 of U.S. Military the sites returned, both soil and groundwater were found to be contaminated with various pollutants, such as benzene, Bases in South arsenic, trichloroethylene (TCE), tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and heavy metals, such as lead, zinc, nickel, copper, and cad- mium . The U .S . government has contended that under the Korea and the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA),1 it is not responsible for cleaning up the bases . The SOFA, initially signed in 1966, had not contained any Responsibility to environmental provisions until the 2001 amendment, under which environmental provisions were for the first time affixed Clean Up to the sub-agreements of the SOFA . In the Memorandum of Special Understandings on Environmental Protection (the 2001 Memorandum),2 the United States documented its policy to remedy contamination that presents “known imminent and substantial endangerment (KISE)” to human health . This policy statement was identical to the general policy established during the 1990s by the U .S . Department by Young Geun Chae of Defense . Whether the requirement of KISE has been met or not has been left open .
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Light: America's First Counter-Terrorism Unit Jack Murphy
    Blue Light: America's First Counter-Terrorism Unit Jack Murphy On a dark night in 1977, a dozen Green Berets exited a C-130 aircraft, parachuting into a very different type of war. Aircraft hijackings had become almost commonplace to the point that Johnny Carson would tell jokes about the phenomena on television. But it was no laughing matter for the Department of Defense, who realized after the Israeli raid on Entebbe, that America was woefully unprepared to counter terrorist attacks. This mission would be different. The Special Forces soldiers guided their MC1-1B parachutes towards the ground but their element became separated in the air, some of the Green Berets landing in the trees. The others set down alongside an airfield, landing inside a thick cloud of fog. Their target lay somewhere through the haze, a military C-130 aircraft that had been captured by terrorists. Onboard there were no hostages, but a black box, a classified encryption device that could not be allowed to fall into enemy hands. Airfield seizures were really a Ranger mission, but someone had elected to parachute in an entire Special Forces battalion for the operation. The HALO team was an advanced element, inserted ahead of time to secure the aircraft prior to the main assault force arriving. Despite missing a number of team members at the rally point, the Green Berets knew they were quickly approaching their hit time. They had to take down the aircraft and soon. Armed with suppressed Sten guns, they quietly advanced through the fog. Using the bad weather to their advantage, they were able to slip right between the sentries posted to guard the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Total Force Using National Guard and Reserves
    IMPROVING THE TOTAL FORCE USING THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES A Report for the transition to the new administration by The Reserve Forces Policy Board RFPB Report FY17-01 This report, Report FY17-01, is a product of the Reserve Forces Policy Board. The Reserve Forces Policy Board is, by law, a federal advisory committee within the Office of the Secretary of Defense. As mandated by Congress, it serves as an independent adviser to provide advice and recommendations directly to the Secretary of Defense on strategies, policies, and practices designed to improve and enhance the capabilities, efficiency, and effectiveness of the reserve components. The content and recommendations contained herein do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Defense. As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, Title 5, and the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 41, Section 102-3 (Federal Advisory Committee Management), this report and its contents were deliberated and approved in several open, public sessions. IMPROVING THE TOTAL FORCE USING THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES A Report for the transition to the new administration by The Reserve Forces Policy Board RFPB Report FY17-01 4 5 6 Chairman Punaro introduces the Secretary of Defense, the Honorable Ashton B. Carter, during the June 9, 2015 Board Meeting. “The presence, skill and readiness of Citizen Warriors across the country give us the agility and flexibility to handle unexpected demands, both at home and abroad. It is an essential component of our total force, and a linchpin of our readiness.” 1 - Secretary of Defense Ash Carter 1 As Delivered by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, Pentagon Auditorium, Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century
    US Army TRADOC TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 AA MilitaryMilitary GuideGuide toto TerrorismTerrorism in the Twenty-First Century US Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC G2 TRADOC Intelligence Support Activity - Threats Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 15 August 2007 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 1 Summary of Change U.S. Army TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 (Version 5.0) A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century Specifically, this handbook dated 15 August 2007 • Provides an information update since the DCSINT Handbook No. 1, A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century, publication dated 10 August 2006 (Version 4.0). • References the U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • References the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Reports on Terrorist Incidents - 2006, dated 30 April 2007. • Deletes Appendix A, Terrorist Threat to Combatant Commands. By country assessments are available in U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • Deletes Appendix C, Terrorist Operations and Tactics. These topics are covered in chapter 4 of the 2007 handbook. Emerging patterns and trends are addressed in chapter 5 of the 2007 handbook. • Deletes Appendix F, Weapons of Mass Destruction. See TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.04. • Refers to updated 2007 Supplemental TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.01, Terror Operations: Case Studies in Terror, dated 25 July 2007. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No. 1.02, Critical Infrastructure Threats and Terrorism, dated 10 August 2006. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Office of the Secretary, the Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–1155 Phone, 703–545–6700
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–1155 Phone, 703–545–6700. Internet, www.defenselink.mil. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ROBERT M. GATES DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WILLIAM LYNN III Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, ASHTON B. CARTER Technology, and Logistics Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Business PAUL A. BRINKLEY Transformation) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense LOUIS W. ARNY III (Installations and Environment) Under Secretary of Defense for Policy MICHELE FLOURNOY Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense JAMES N. MILLER, JR. for Policy Assistant Secretary of Defense (International ALEXANDER R. VERSHBOW Security Affairs) Assistant Secretary of Defense (Special MICHAEL VICKERS Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict) Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland (VACANCY) Defense and America’s Security) Assistant Secretary of Defense (Global Strategic JOSEPH BENKERT Affairs Assistant Secretary of Defense (Asian and (VACANCY) Pacific Security Affairs) Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Plans) JANINE DAVIDSON Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (VACANCY) (Technology Security Policy/Counter Proliferation) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Strategy, KATHLEEN HICKS Plans and Forces) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Policy PETER VERGA Integration and Chief of Staff) Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense WILLIAM J. CARR, Acting for Personnel and Readiness Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs) DAVID L. MCGINNIS, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve JENNIFER C. BUCK Affairs) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Program JEANNE FITES Integration) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Readiness) SAMUEL D. KLEINMAN Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Military WILLIAM J. CARR Personnel Policy) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Military ARTHUR J. MYERS, Acting Community and Family Policy) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Plans) GAIL H.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    GLOSSARY OF TERMS AC-130 SPECTRE: A ground support aircraft used by the U.S. military, based on the C-130 cargo plane. AC-130s are armed with a 105mm howitzer, 40mm cannons, and 7.62mm miniguns, and are considered the premier close air support weapon of the U.S. arsenal. Accuracy International: A British company producing high-quality preci- sion rifes, often used for military sniper applications. ACOG: Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight. A magnifed optical sight designed for use on rifes and carbines made by Trijicon. Te ACOG is popular among U.S. forces as it provides both magnifcation and an illuminated reticle that provides aiming points for various target ranges. AQ: Al-Qaeda. Meaning “the Base” in Arabic. A radical Islamic terrorist organization once led by Osama bin Laden. AQI: Al-Qaeda in Iraq. An Al-Qaeda-afliated Sunni insurgent group that was active against U.S. forces. Elements of AQI eventually evolved into ISIS. AT-4: Tube-launched 84mm anti-armor rocket produced in Sweden and used by U.S. forces since the 1980s. Te AT-4 is a throwaway weapon: after it is fred, the tube is discarded. ATF/BATFE: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. A federal law enforcement agency, formally part of the Department of 393 1p_Carr_TerminalList_ds.indd 393 8/22/17 1:07 PM 394 GLOSSARY OF TERMS the Treasury, that doesn’t seem overly concerned with alcohol or to- bacco. ATPIAL: Advanced Target Pointer/Illuminator Aiming Laser. A weapon- mounted device that emits both visible and infrared target designa- tors for use with or without night observation devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserve Forces Review 2030 Unlocking the Reserves’ Potential to Strengthen a Resilient and Global Britain
    Reserve Forces Review 2030 Unlocking the reserves’ potential to strengthen a resilient and global Britain May 2021 Contents Executive summary 7 Reserve Forces Review 2030 recommendations 11 Chapter 1 – Context and the imperative for change 15 Chapter 2 – Redefining the relationship between the reserves and society 25 Chapter 3 – Expanding the role of the reserves 43 Chapter 4 – Unlocking the potential of reservists 55 Chapter 5 – Transforming support to the reserves 73 Engagement log 88 Glossary 102 Reserve Forces Review 2030 3 4 Reserve Forces Review 2030 Foreword Brigadier The Rt Hon The Lord Lancaster TD VR When the Chief of the Defence Staff asked me to chair an independent review into the reserve forces, I leapt at the opportunity. For over 32 years, the Army Reserve has been an integral part of my life and perhaps the one constant of my adult years. Like many fellow reservists, my service has been part of a fairly consistent juggling act between the competing demands of a hectic professional career, private life and soldiering. In writing this foreword I recognise that so much has changed. Rather than looking ‘down and in’ at the use of The reserves have evolved from almost entirely reserves by the single services, we have been contingent forces – that trained at weekends tasked with looking ‘up and out’. and annual camps, recruited locally, and were At its heart, this Reserve Forces Review 2030 encapsulated by names such as ‘Territorial (RF30) is about people and skills, and how Army’ and ‘Royal Auxiliary Air Force’ – to the Defence, industry, government and wider reserve forces we have today across all three society can share them.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence & Public Protection
    UCD Career Development Centre DEFENCE & PUBLIC PROTECTION Sector Background An Garda Síochána Policing is a challenging and exciting role and one which continually presents new and interesting experiences. Modern policing entails much more than crime fighting. Reducing the fear of crime and working in partnership with communities are the keys to making a positive difference and improving quality of life for all citizens. Members of An Garda Síochána operate on the front line, supporting victims and witnesses, providing reassurance and instilling confidence. They are also in a position to make a proactive contribution to an area, building relationships and trust within the community. The career presents opportunities to work in a wide variety of fields including Community Policing, Traffic Control and Regulation, Public Order, Detective Duties, Organised Crime, Fraud and Drugs Offences. The Defence Forces The role of the Defence Forces is to defend the state, aid the civil power participating in United Nations missions overseas and provide a fishery protection service. The Defence Forces may be called on by Government to perform other duties in times of emergency. The Defence Forces includes the Permanent Defence Force and the Reserve Defence Force. The Permanent Defence Force ​ ● The Army ● The Air Corps ● The Naval Service The Air Corps is the air component of the Defence Forces with its base and headquarters at Casement Aerodrome in Baldonnel, Co. Dublin. The Naval Service is the maritime component of the Defence Forces with its base and headquarters located in Haulbowline, Co. Cork. The Naval Service is also the principal seagoing agency of the state and is primarily responsible for Maritime Defence and Fishery Protection but also contributes to the State’s law enforcement, search and rescue and emergency response capability.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Army Airfield
    IMPACTS Deployment Guide Hunter Army Airfield ESPO Winter 2019-2020 Live Document: Last Updated 1/7/2020 Introduction Welcome to Hunter Army Airfield (Hunter AAF). This orientation package was created to help you become familiar with the area and to answer some of the questions you may have when you arrive. If you have questions regarding the contents of this package, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the ESPO team. Table of Contents Background 2 Hunter Army Airfield 2 Savannah, Georgia 2 Climate and Weather 2 Arrival and Badging Information 2 Before Arrival 2 Directions 3 Arrival at Hunter 3 Image 1: Aerial view of Hangar 7901, Montgomery Gate, and the Residence Inn. 3 Image 3: Aerial view of parking at Hangar 7901 4 Information on Lodging 4 Lab & Office Information 4 Network 4 Office Equipment 5 Image 3: Forecast briefing area at Hunter. 5 Shipping/Storage 5 Shipments to Hunter Army Airfield 5 Safety 6 Lab, Hangar, & Ramp Safety 6 Emergency Services 6 Other Important Contacts 7 Mission Information 7 Mission Schedule 7 Reporting & Archiving 7 1 Background Hunter Army Airfield The city of Savannah transformed 900 acres of forest, pasture and swamp into the Savannah Municipal Airport in 1929. It was not until 1940 that the airport was renamed Hunter Municipal Airfield after the Savannah native and WWI pilot Lieutenant Colonel Frank O’Driscoll Hunter. This airfield served as an operational training unit during WWII and after. Savannah, Georgia Savannah was founded as a British colonial capital in 1733 and is the oldest city in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Closing of Fort Devens
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1998 Lifestyle management education : a case study of the closing of Fort Devens. Janet B. Sullivan University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Sullivan, Janet B., "Lifestyle management education : a case study of the closing of Fort Devens." (1998). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 5347. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/5347 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLOSING OF FORT DEVENS A Dissertation Presented by JANET B. SULLIVAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION February 1998 School of Education ® Copyright 1998 by Janet B. Sullivan All Rights Reserved LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLOSING OF FORT DEVENS A Dissertation Presented BY JANET B. SULLIVAN Approved as to style and content: C. Carey, Member ft SM-C+' ^/Sheila Mammen, Member Dean ACfQPMLEDGMENTS "Be All That You Can Be" is the Army's recruiting motto. I have been employed by the US Army since 1974. First, I was an Army officer; and now I am a federal civilian employee working as The Equal Employment Opportunity Officer at Fort Carson, Colorado.
    [Show full text]