A Proposal for an Additional Beamline to the Triumf Isac Facility

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference A PROPOSAL FOR AN ADDITIONAL BEAMLINE TO THE TRIUMF ISAC FACILITY Glen Stinson and Pierre Bricault TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 2A3 Abstract ton experimental hall. The energy range of this beamline is 180 to 500 MeV at a maximum intensity of 10 µA. The present ISAC facility at TRIUMF is fed by one beamline, beamline 2A, that can direct beam to one of two target locations. One of these targets has been in use since ISAC was commissioned; the second is currently being commissioned. The number of proposals for experiments at ISAC are such that we feel the need to deliver more si- multaneous radioactive ion beams. A proposal has been made for an another beamline to ISAC so as to make addi- tional beams available. Through partial extraction by H− stripping, this proposed line would extract a 450-500 MeV beam from extraction port 4 of the TRIUMF cyclotron. A fast switching system would be used to feed an addi- tional two target stations, each equipped with its own mass- separator system. These new target stations will allow tar- get and ion-source development, and also at least three si- multaneous experiments at ISAC. In addition to these two Figure 1: Beamlines in the cyclotron vault. target stations, provision for a 200 µA beam dump has been made. The TRIUMF ISAC facility is now fed by one beamline, beamline 2A, that delivers extracted beam in a northerly INTRODUCTION direction. This beamline is designed for extraction ener- gies between 480 and 500 MeV and an intensity of 100 ISAC at TRIUMF is a radioactive ion beam facility that µA. Currently, the typical operating intensity of 50 µAis uses the isotope separation on line (ISOL) technique to pro- limited by the targets. The primary proton beam can be di- duce radioactive ion beams (RIB). The ISOL system con- rected to one of two targets: the west target that has been sists of a primary production beam, a target/ion source, in operation since ISAC was commissioned, and the east a mass separator, and a separated-beam transport system. target to which the proton beam has been delivered just These systems together act as the source of radioactive ion recently. Because of the demand for experimental beam, beams to be provided to the accelerator or the low-energy provision of additional beamlines to ISAC is considered experimental areas. We utilize the 500 MeV - 100 µA pri- imperative. mary proton beam extracted from the H− cyclotron[1]. A new beamline has been built to transport this beam to one THE PROPOSED BEAMLINE 4N of the two target stations followed immediately by a resid- ual proton beam dump. Historically, extraction port 4 of the TRIUMF cyclotron Before discussing the proposed new beamline we present has been used for beam delivery to the TRIUMF proton an overview of the beamlines that are presently in operation experimental hall. There the demand for beam time for ex- at TRIUMF. Figure 1 shows a layout of the TRIUMF cy- periments has been declining. Consequently, it is proposed clotron and the existing beamlines. Beamline 1A (BL1A), to install another beamline from this extraction port such running to the east of the cyclotron, is the high-current that this new beamline could be used to provide the addi- beamline that feeds experiments in the meson experimen- tional lines to the ISAC facility. The vault portion of this tal hall. Although capable of extracting beams in the en- beamline is seen in the upper left corner of figure 1. An ergy range from 180 to 500 MeV at a maximum intensity overview of the proposed facility is shown in figure 2. of 170 µA, it is normally run at 500 MeV at a beam current This new beamline, called beamline 4N (N for North), of ∼150 µA. Beamline 2C is used for proton therapy (PT) more-or-less parallels BL2A and runs north to deliver beam and for isotope production. The latter accepts beam in the to another set of targets and mass analyzing systems. Thus, energy range of 70 to 110 MeV with a typical beam current in principle, three beams of radioactive ions—one from of 50µA (maximum 80 µA). To the west of the cyclotron, beamline 2A and two from beamline 4N—could be deliv- beamline 4 (BL4) feeds beams to experimenters in the pro- ered to ISAC. 0-7803-7739-9 ©2003 IEEE 1670 Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference LASER EQUIP PAUL TRAP (ABOVE) 8Pi LTNO Pumping Controls Gas YIELD Cylinders 2063H 250l MBC 1000- Helium E1M18 CSB E1M8 E1M8 OLIS P/S CONT T er mi n a l UP X= 551.700 Y=2352.791 Z=3222.375 I I B B P IB P 0 P 0 0 . 5 . S B 8 / L 5 . 0 8 8 9 ) Q D = 4 1 T 0 H 0 G I 0 E Q W M I ( . 5 . S B 8 / L 5 . 0 8 8 9 ) Q D = 4 1 T 0 H 0 G I 0 E Q W IM ( 9 4 2 3 L D I B IB P P 0 0 0 0 P P B I B I 0 0 P P B I B I I I B B P P 0 0 0 P B I 0 P IB 0 P B I 0 P IB 0 P B I 0 P B I 0 P IB 0 P IB 0 P B I 0 P IB DL 3249 DL 3249 0 P B I 0 P B I 4 Q / 1 4 8 4 Q 4 / 1 8 4 Q 1 4 8 / 0 P B I 0 P IB Y M3 A/1 BL4 SM5 A/1 BL4 R MBE CHA SFU ETER ARIM POL SM4 A/1 BL4 1 Q4 1 1 / 8 L4A B 1 5 9 /1 Q 0 A 7 BL4 0 2 0 1 0 6 0 4AQ10 0 2 1 2B 4AQ9 4A/ 2 1 4 1 4AQ8 A/1B2 DIPOL E 5 0 0 2 1 2 4 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 0 2 4 0 1 2 0 2 5 0 1 1 0 0 P IB 2 1 6 0 0 0 2 8 / 4 7 1 Q 4 0 9 8 / 4 1 0 Q 4 Figure 2: Beamlines to the ISAC facility: existing BL2A (right) and proposed BL4N (left). Optics of the beamline another double waist with a beam size of ±2 mm in each of the horizontal and vertical directions. The vault section of BL4N utilizes the first three A quadrupole doublet and a switching magnet follow. quadrupoles of BL4. Because we wish to leave the beam- The switching magnet directs beam to the two targets. The ◦ lines to the proton experimental hall intact, the existing 40 east target is reached through a bend (relative to the beam ◦ dipole is replaced with a switching magnet that bends 40 direction at the entrance of the switching magnet) of 60◦ ◦ left and 32.6 right with respect to the direction of the ex- to the right followed by one of 30◦ to the left. Similarly, tracted beam. A quadrupole doublet is also added in this the west target is reached by a bend of 40◦ to the right fol- vault section. There follows a long 16 m drift through the lowed by one of 10◦ to the left. Beam size at each target (existing) shielding berm of the cyclotron to the tunnel that is designed to be a double waist of dimensions ±2mmin encloses the remaining portion of the beamline. In the tun- each of the horizontal and vertical directions. Because any ◦ nel a quadrupole doublet, another 32.6 dipole, and another targets will be relatively thick, double achromaticity at a quadrupole doublet are the first transport elements encoun- target is not required. However, the beamline is designed tered by the beam. These elements are used to produce to be spatially achromatic (R16 =0in TRANSPORT no- a dispersed double waist at the midpoint of the long drift tation) only at a target. through the berm and a doubly-achromatic double waist Figure 3 shows the beam half-widths along the beamline downstream of the last dipole. leading to the east target. Note that the vertical half-width A four-quadrupole matching section follows to produce is plotted as negative. 1671 Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference development and simultaneous delivery of RIB to experi- ments. Development of new RIB is crucial because each ele- ment can take up to 2 years before it can be delivered to experiments. On the other hand, ion-source development in the harsh environment of the target is even more crucial. In order to allow target and ion source developments for the future program at ISAC we are planning to build new target stations on the new beam line 4N. The actual tar- get hall will be expanded to the west to include room for the two new target stations. The idea is to use as much of the actual infrastructure that we have developed over the last 10 years for the remote handling, nuclear ventilation, waste storage, etc. Furthermore, the new target station will use the same technology we have successfully developed for our actual RIB operation. Figure 2 shows a layout of Figure 3: Beam envelopes along the beamline leading to the actual and proposed target stations. Each of the new the east target.
Recommended publications
  • X-Ray and Optical Diagnostic Beamlines at the Australian Synchrotron Storage Ring

    X-Ray and Optical Diagnostic Beamlines at the Australian Synchrotron Storage Ring

    Proceedings of EPAC 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland THPLS002 X-RAY AND OPTICAL DIAGNOSTIC BEAMLINES AT THE AUSTRALIAN SYNCHROTRON STORAGE RING M. J. Boland, A. C. Walsh, G. S. LeBlanc, Y.-R. E. Tan, R. Dowd and M. J. Spencer, Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. Abstract powerful diagnostic tool which will deliver data to the Two diagnostic beamlines have been designed and machine group as well as information to the machine constructed for the Australian Synchrotron Storage Ring status display for the users. [1]. One diagnostic beamline is a simple x-ray pinhole General Layout camera system, with a BESSY II style pinhole array [2], designed to measure the beam divergence, size and Fig. 1. shows the schematic layout of the XDB with a stability. The second diagnostic beamline uses an optical sketch of the expected beam profile measurement. Both chicane to extract the visible light from the photon beam diagnostic beamlines have dipole source points. The and transports it to various instruments. The end-station electron beam parameters for the source points are shown of the optical diagnostic beamline is equipped with a Table 1. for storage ring with the nominal lattice of zero streak camera, a fast ICCD camera, a CCD camera and a dispersion in the straights and assuming 1% coupling. Fill Pattern Monitor to analyse and optimise the electron Table 1: Electron beam parameters at the source points. beam using the visible synchrotron light. Parameter ODB XDB β x (m) 0.386 0.386 MOTIVATION β y (m) 32.507 32.464 The Storage Ring diagnostic beamlines were desiged to σx (μm) 99 98 serve two essential functions: σx′ (μrad) 240 241 1.
  • Celebrating 40 Years of Beam at Triumf

    Celebrating 40 Years of Beam at Triumf

    BEAMTIME News from Canada’s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics spriNg 2015 | Volume 12 issue 1 Celebrating inside this issue 40 Years of Beam 04 ForTY Years oN 06 FirsT 40 Years at TriumF oF TriumF sCieNCe 08 Ariel e-liNaC 10 ariel sCieNCe program 12 NeWs & aNNouNCemeNTs 14 ProFile Michael Craddock 15 CommerCializaTioN spring Editor: marcello pavan Production: serengeti Design group Beamtime is available online at: www.triumf.ca/home/for-media/ publicationsgallery/newsletter Inquiries or comments to: [email protected] © 2015 TRIUMF Beamtime All Rights Reserved TriumF 4004 Wesbrook Mall Vancouver, BC V6T 2A3 Canada +1 604 222 1047 telephone +1 604 222 1074 fax www.triumf.ca To obtain Beamtime by PDF, sign up at http://lists.triumf.ca/mailman/list- info/triumf-publications TRIUMF is funded by a contribution through the National Research Council of Canada. The province of British Columbia provides capital funding for the construction of buildings for the TRIUMF Laboratory. Director’s VoiCe 3 Jonathan Bagger | Director, TRIUMF Forty Years of reliability Just imagine the excitement and sense of achievement that must have swept through TRIUMF forty years ago, when TRIUMF’s rich the first beam was extracted from the main cyclotron! “history serves An extraordinary feat of engineering, TRIUMF’s 500 MeV cyclotron remains at the as a foundation heart of the laboratory. A machine so robust that it continues to drive cutting-edge on which to build science some four decades later, even being recognized as an Engineering Milestone by the IEEE. new capabilities And that first beam really was just the beginning.
  • National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) Project

    National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) Project

    Department of Energy Project Management Workshop 2016 “Enhancing Project Management” National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS‐II) Project Frank J. Crescenzo, Federal Project Director Office of Science ‐ Brookhaven Site Office NSLS‐II Project • Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SRF) • 10,000 times brighter than NSLS with ultra‐low emittance and exceptional beam stability • Delivers world leading capability to image single atoms • Total Project Cost (TPC) = $912M, TEC= $791.2M; OPC=$120.8M • $150M ARRA accelerated funding profile (did not increase TPC) • LINAC, 3.0 GeV Booster, 500mA Storage Ring 791.5m circumference • 7 Insertion Device Beamlines (ultimate capability for over 60 beamlines) • Various buildings totaling 628,000 gross square feet • Completed 6 months early, added $68M scope from CD‐2 baseline Injector & Storage Ring LINAC BOOSTER STORAGE RING INSERTION DEVICE Beamlines & Endstations CSX Beamline XPD Endstation CHX Endstation HXN Endstation NSLS‐II Floor Plan L‐ LINAC B‐ Booster RF‐ RF facility 1‐5 – Pendant # Why Was This Project Successful? • Basic Energy Science’s (project sponsor) commitment to project success • Laboratory commitment to project success • Excellent Integrated Project Team • Project team’s technical capabilities 6 Thanks! Steven Dierker Laboratory Project Director Aesook Byon Laboratory Deputy Project Director Robert Caradonna Deputy Federal Project Director Phillip Kraushaar Program Manager, SC‐BES 7 Back‐up Slides 8 National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS‐II) Project Storage Ring Lab Office Building (LOB) Satellite Beamline Endstation Building Frank Crescenzo –FPD CD‐4 Achieved March 19, 2015 Brookhaven Site Office (BHSO) Schedule Funding Profile 11 Project Costs WBS WBS Name At CD‐2 Added Scope Final Contingency Utilization Contingency was used primarily for project support which was underestimated and augmented 1.01 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $52,506 $4,743 $69,752 to execute scope additions.
  • The Radiological Situation in the Beam-Cleaning Sections of the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) I I CHAPTER 5 Benchmark Measurements

    The Radiological Situation in the Beam-Cleaning Sections of the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) I I CHAPTER 5 Benchmark Measurements

    Markus Brugger The Radiological Situation in the Beam-Cleaning Sections of the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Technischen Wissenschaften eingereicht an der Technischen Universität Graz Rechbauerstraße 12 A - 8010 Graz CERN-THESIS-2003-039 //2003 Begutachter: Ao.Univ.-Prof. Dr.techn. Ewald Schachinger Institut fur Theoretische Physik der TU Graz Graz, November 2003 Kurzfassung Diese Dissertation beschäftigt sich mit radiologischen Aspekten am "Large Hadron Collider", welcher momentan am CERN gebaut wird. Im Detail handelt es sich dabei um die beiden so genannten "Beam Cleaning Insertions", jene Bereiche in welchen man versucht möglichst alle Teilchen zu absorbieren, welche ansonsten in anderen Teilen des Beschleunigers zu Schäden führen könnten. Es werden zwei kritische Aspekte des Strahlenschutzes behandelt: Dosisleistung durch induzierte Radioaktivität und die Aktivierung von Luft. Die Anpassung des Designs dieser Regionen in Verbindung mit einer detaillierten Abschätzung der jeweiligen Dosisleistungen ist von großer Wichtigkeit für spätere Wartungsarbeiten. Bisher standen lediglich sehr eingeschränkte Studien über die in jenen Regionen zu erwartenden Strahlenniveaus zur Verfügung, welche diese Dissertation nun zu erweitern und vervollständigen sucht. Dabei wird eine neue Methode angewendet um Dosisleistungen zu bestimmen, welche, da sie zum ersten Mal zu deren Berechnung verwendet wird, sorgfältig im Rahmen eines Experimentes überprüft wird. Zusätzlich stellt die Aktivierung der Luft einen wichtigen Aspekt für die Inbetriebnahme des Beschleunigers dar. Jüngste Änderungen im Konzept des Beschleunigers, machen eine Revision vorhandener Ergebnisse und eine umfassende neue Studie notwendig. Die Ergebnisse von beiden Studien sind von großer Wichtigkeit für die weiteren Entscheidungen bezüglich des endgültigen Entwurfs der "Beam Cleaning Insertions".
  • Conceptual Design Report Jülich High

    Conceptual Design Report Jülich High

    General Allgemeines ual Design Report ual Design Report Concept Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source Source Jülich High Brilliance Neutron 8 Conceptual Design Report Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source (HBS) T. Brückel, T. Gutberlet (Eds.) J. Baggemann, S. Böhm, P. Doege, J. Fenske, M. Feygenson, A. Glavic, O. Holderer, S. Jaksch, M. Jentschel, S. Kleefisch, H. Kleines, J. Li, K. Lieutenant,P . Mastinu, E. Mauerhofer, O. Meusel, S. Pasini, H. Podlech, M. Rimmler, U. Rücker, T. Schrader, W. Schweika, M. Strobl, E. Vezhlev, J. Voigt, P. Zakalek, O. Zimmer Allgemeines / General Allgemeines / General Band / Volume 8 Band / Volume 8 ISBN 978-3-95806-501-7 ISBN 978-3-95806-501-7 T. Brückel, T. Gutberlet (Eds.) Gutberlet T. Brückel, T. Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source (HBS) 1 100 mA proton ion source 2 70 MeV linear accelerator 5 3 Proton beam multiplexer system 5 4 Individual neutron target stations 4 5 Various instruments in the experimental halls 3 5 4 2 1 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 4 5 5 Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Allgemeines / General Band / Volume 8 CONTENT I. Executive summary 7 II. Foreword 11 III. Rationale 13 1. Neutron provision 13 1.1 Reactor based fission neutron sources 14 1.2 Spallation neutron sources 15 1.3 Accelerator driven neutron sources 15 2. Neutron landscape 16 3. Baseline design 18 3.1 Comparison to existing sources 19 IV. Science case 21 1. Chemistry 24 2. Geoscience 25 3. Environment 26 4. Engineering 27 5. Information and quantum technologies 28 6. Nanotechnology 29 7. Energy technology 30 8.
  • Beamline CDR Template

    Beamline CDR Template

    LT-XFD_CDR_XPD-00118 NSLS-II Project CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT for the COHERENT HARD X-RAY BEAMLINE AT NSLS-II final draft Sep 2009 NSLS-II Project, Brookhaven National Laboratory Intentionally blank. ii September 2009 Conceptual Design Report for the Coherent Hard X-Ray (CHX) Beamline at NSLS-II Approvals and Reviewers Compiled by Signature Date Andrei Fluerasu, CHX Beamline Scientist, NSLS-II Approved Qun Shen, XFD Director, NSLS-II Reviewers Robert L. Leheny, BAT Spokesperson, on behalf of the BAT Andy Broadbent, Beamlines Manager Nicholas Gmür, ESH Coordinator, NSLS-II Sushil Sharma, Mechanical Engineering Group Leader, NSLS-II Document Updates The Conceptual Design Report for the Coherent Hard X-ray Beamline at NSLS-II is a controlled document, revised under change control. Version No. Date Changes made A 5/13/2009 Initial draft, submitted to BAT B 9/16/2009 Second submittal to BAT, and first to editing 1 10/1/2009 Final draft, submitted to BAT September 2009 iii NSLS-II Project, Brookhaven National Laboratory Intentionally blank. iv September 2009 Conceptual Design Report for the Coherent Hard X-Ray (CHX) Beamline at NSLS-II Contents 1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Scientific Requirements .........................................................................................................................1 Glassy Dynamics in Soft Matter.............................................................................................................2
  • Beam and Detectors

    Beam and Detectors

    Beam and detectors Beamline for schools 2018 Preface All the big discoveries in science have started by curious minds asking simple questions: How? Why? This is how you should start. Then you should investigate with the help of this document whether this question could be answered with the available equipment (or with material that you can provide) and the experimental setup of the Beamline for Schools at CERN. As your proposal takes shape, you will be learning a lot about particle physics, detectors, data acquisition, data analysis, statistics and much more. You will not be alone during this journey: there is a list of volunteer physicists who are happy to interact with you and to provide you with additional information and advice. Remember: It is not necessary to propose a very ambitious experiment to succeed in the Beamline for Schools competition. We are looking for exciting and original ideas! Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 The Beamline for Schools ......................................................................................................................... 3 Typical equipment .................................................................................................................................... 4 Trigger and
  • Lessons Learned from Neutron Instrument Beamline Construction

    Lessons Learned from Neutron Instrument Beamline Construction

    SNS NFDD PM-LL-0001-R02 LESSONS LEARNED FROM NEUTRON INSTRUMENT BEAMLINE CONSTRUCTION December 2009 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. i SNS NFDD PM-LL-0001-R02 LESSONS LEARNED FROM NEUTRON INSTRUMENT BEAMLINE CONSTRUCTION December 2009 Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory for UT-BATTELLE, LLC under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ii Beam Line Lessons Learned System Integration Design Criteria Document (DCD) – Insure that this document clearly states all requirements for the project (including interfaces), that it is reviewed by all appropriate personnel, and signed off by the instrument customer(s). The document should be kept up to date so that the engineering team is always designing to the criteria – not rumor or latest desires. Baseline Debut – Soon after the DCD and P&ID have been drafted, the instrument scientist should present his/her vision of the instrument function, equipment, and operation to a panel consisting of the engineering team, management, key IDT members and other appropriate scientists.
  • Arxiv:1408.0753V1 [Physics.Ins-Det]

    Arxiv:1408.0753V1 [Physics.Ins-Det]

    Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline at the Spallation Neutron Source at ORNL N. Fomin1, G. L. Greene1,2, R. Allen2 , V. Cianciolo2, C. Crawford3, T. Ito7, P. R. Huffman2,4, E. B. Iverson2, R. Mahurin5, W. M. Snow6 1University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA 2Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA 3University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA 4North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA 5University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 6Indiana University and Center for the Exploration of Energy and Matter, Bloomington, IN, USA 7Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA Abstract We describe the Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline (FnPB) facility located at the Spal- lation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The FnPB was designed for the con- duct of experiments that investigate scientific issues in nuclear physics, particle physics, and astrophysics and cosmology using a pulsed slow neutron beam. We present a detailed descrip- tion of the design philosophy, beamline components, and measured fluxes of the polychromatic and monochromatic beams. 1. Introduction Cold neutrons and ultracold neutrons (UCN) have been employed in a wide variety of experi- ments that shed light on important issues in nuclear, particle, and astrophysics. These include the determination of fundamental constants, the study of fundamental symmetry violation, searches for new interactions in nature and tests of the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics. Their special combination of properties make them a good choice to address the expanded list of funda- mental scientific mysteries which now confront us in the wake of the discoveries of dark matter and dark energy, which shows that 95% of the energy content of the universe resides in some un- known form.
  • Guidelines for Beamline Radiation Shielding Design at the National Synchrotron Light Source II

    Guidelines for Beamline Radiation Shielding Design at the National Synchrotron Light Source II

    Guidelines for Beamline Radiation Shielding Design at the National Synchrotron Light Source II Wah-Keat Lee, Razvan Popescu, Zhenghua Xia, Steve Ehrlich and P. K. Job Table of Contents 1. NSLS-II RADIATION SHIELDING POLICY ............................................................................... 4 2. RADIATION SOURCE PARAMETERS AND SHIELDING DESIGN SIMULATIONS........................ 4 3. GENERAL PERSONNEL PROTECTION SYSTEMS GUIDELINES ................................................ 5 4. THERMAL MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 5 5. RAY TRACES ....................................................................................................................... 6 6. GUIDELINES FOR STOPS, COLLIMATORS AND SHUTTERS ................................................. 6 6.1 Primary bremsstrahlung stops, collimators and white beam shutters ........................... 6 6.2 Integral primary bremsstrahlung stop with pink/monochromatic beam apertures ....... 7 6.3 Pink beam shutters/stops ............................................................................................ 8 6.4 Monochromatic beam shutters/stops .......................................................................... 8 7. GUIDELINES FOR SHIELDED ENCLOSURES .......................................................................... 9 7.1 White beam enclosures (or First Optical Enclosures) .................................................... 9 7.2 Monochromatic beam enclosures .............................................................................
  • The TRIUMF Newsletter News from Canada’S National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics

    The TRIUMF Newsletter News from Canada’S National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics

    The TRIUMF Newsletter News from Canada’s National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics DIRECTOR’S NOTES TRIUMF MAGNETS INSTALLED AT LHC very year, TRIUMF has a three-month Eperiod where the accelerators and associated infrastructure undergo extensive maintenance and any planned upgrade. The shutdown period is normally the fi rst three months of the calendar year, but this year, since the regulatory license for the ISAC-II accelerator to send a radioactive beam to an experiment was received at the beginning of January, the shutdown period was delayed to the fourth week of January. This enabled a Shown are six of the 52 Canadian twin-aperture quadrupole magnets two-week running period for MAYA, the fi rst installed in one of the straight “collimation” ISAC-II experiment. The experiment involved sections of the Large Hadron Collider the production of 11Li by the 500 MeV proton tunnel at CERN. (Only one of the two beam beam and acceleration of the lithium beam through apertures is visible - at the bottom right.) These magnets were designed and built ISAC-I and ISAC-II accelerator complex before in a collaborative effort amongst CERN, injection into the MAYA apparatus, which had TRIUMF, and Alstom-Canada. been brought to TRIUMF from GANIL in time for this experiment. The ISAC-II accelerator worked Recent developments in the FIBIAD ion source, TRIUMF for the analysis of data, which will soon superbly during the experiment and exciting new and the relocation of the driver lasers for the laser stream from the LHC at CERN. I am pleased to data from the reaction 11Li(p,t) 9Li was obtained.
  • A New LLRF System for ASTRID and the Proposed ASTRID2

    A New LLRF System for ASTRID and the Proposed ASTRID2

    Jørgen S. Nielsen Institute for Storage Ring Facilities (ISA) Aarhus University Denmark ESLS XVIII (25-26/11 2010), Status of the ASTRID2 project 1 ` ASTRID2 is the new synchrotron light source presently being built in Aarhus, Denmark ` Dec 2008: Received 37 MDKr (5 M€) to ◦ Build a new SR light source ◦ Convert ASTRID into a booster ◦ Move existing beam lines x New 2 T Multi Pole Wiggler ` The project should be finished in 2013 ESLS XVIII (25-26/11 2010), Status of the ASTRID2 project 2 ` ASTRID2 main parameters ◦ Electron energy: 580 MeV ◦ Emittance: 12 nm ◦ Beam Current: 200 mA ◦ Circumference: 45.7 m ◦ 6-fold symmetry x lattice: DBA with 12 combined function dipole magnets x Integrated quadrupole gradient ◦ 4 straight sections for insertion devices ◦ Will use ASTRID as booster (full energy injection) x Allows top-up operation ESLS XVIII (25-26/11 2010), Status of the ASTRID2 project 3 ESLS XVIII (25-26/11 2010), Status of the ASTRID2 project 4 ASTRID2 parameters Combined function dipoles 6x2 solid sector Energy 580 MeV Nominal (max.) dipole field 1.1975 (1.25) T Circumference 45.704 m Bending radius 1.62 m Current 200 mA Nominal quadrupole field ‐3.219 T/m Nominal sextupole field ‐8.0 T/m2 Straight sections 4x2.7 m Quadrupoles 6x(2+2) Betatron tunes 5.185, 2.14 Magnetic length 0.132 m Coupling factor <10% Max. gradient 20 T/m Horizontal emittance 12 nm Sextupoles 6x(2+1) Natural chromaticity ‐6, ‐11 Magnetic length 0.170 m Dynamical aperture 25‐30 mm Max.