1 Design, Construction, and Demonstration of A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Design, Construction, and Demonstration of A DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND DEMONSTRATION OF A NEUTRON BEAMLINE AND A NEUTRON IMAGING FACILITY AT A MARK-I TRIGA REACTOR by Aaron E. Craft 1 Copyright by Aaron E. Craft 2012 All Rights Reserved i A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Coloado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Nuclear Science and Engineering). Golden, Colorado Date _____________________ Signed: _____________________ Aaron E. Craft Signed: _____________________ Dr. Jeffrey C. King Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date _____________________ Signed: _____________________ Dr. Jeffrey C. King Assistant Professor and Interim Director Nuclear Science and Engineering Program Signed: _____________________ Dr. Michael J. Kaufman Professor and Head Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering ii ABSTRACT The fleet of research and training reactors is aging, and no new research reactors are planned in the United States. Thus, there is a need to expand the capabilities of existing reactors to meet users’ needs. While many research reactors have beam port facilities, the original design of the United States Geological Survey TRIGA Reactor (GSTR) did not include beam ports. The MInes NEutron Radiography (MINER) facility developed by this thesis and installed at the GSTR provides new capabilities for both researchers and students at the Colorado School of Mines. The facility consists of a number of components, including a neutron beamline and beamstop, an optical table, an experimental enclosure and associated interlocks, a computer control system, a multi-channel plate imaging detector, and the associated electronics. The neutron beam source location, determined through Monte Carlo modeling, provides the best mixture of high neutron flux, high thermal neutron content, and low gamma radiation content. A Monte Carlo n-Particle (MCNP) model of the neutron beam provides researchers with a tool for designing experiments before placing objects in the neutron beam. Experimental multi- foil activation results, compared to calculated multi-foil activation results, verify the model. The MCNP model predicts a neutron beamline flux of 2.2*106 ± 6.4*105 n/cm2-s based on a source particle rate determined from the foil activation experiments when the reactor is operating at a power of 950 kWt with the beam shutter fully open. The average cadmium ratio of the beamline is 7.4, and the L/D of the neutron beam is approximately 200±10. Radiographs of a sensitivity indicator taken using both the digital detector and the transfer foil method provide one demonstration of the radiographic capabilities of the new facility. Calibration fuel pins manufactured using copper and stainless steel surrogate fuel pellets provide additional specimens for demonstration of the new facility and offer a comparison between digital and film radiography at the new facility. Comparison of the radiographs taken by the two methods reveals that the digital detector does not produce high quality images when compared to film radiography. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. iii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. vi LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... ix NOMENCLATURE ....................................................................................................................x LIST OFABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................................................................................... xii DEDICATION ........................................................................................................................ xiii 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 2 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................3 2.1 History of Neutron Radiography ...................................................................................3 2.2 Fundamentals of Neutron Imaging ................................................................................6 2.3 Neutron Beams ........................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Neutron Sources .......................................................................................................... 14 2.4.1 Radioisotope Sources ........................................................................................... 14 2.4.2 Accelerator-Based Systems .................................................................................. 15 2.4.3 Nuclear Reactors .................................................................................................. 17 2.4.4 The United States Geological Survey TRIGA Reactor ......................................... 19 2.5 Neutron Imaging Techniques and Detection Methods.................................................. 21 2.5.1 Direct Imaging Methods....................................................................................... 22 2.5.2 Indirect Imaging Methods .................................................................................... 23 2.5.3 Dynamic Neutron Radioscopy.............................................................................. 25 2.5.4 Computed Tomography ....................................................................................... 29 2.6 Radiographic Artifacts and Image Processing.............................................................. 30 2.6.1 Nonuniformity ..................................................................................................... 30 2.6.2 Acquisition System Defects ................................................................................. 30 2.6.3 Beam Hardening .................................................................................................. 31 iv 2.7 Neutron Imaging Applications .................................................................................... 32 3 MAJOR FACILITY SUBSYSTEMS................................................................................. 35 3.1 Neutron Beamline ....................................................................................................... 35 3.1.1 Beamline Design and Control .............................................................................. 35 3.1.2 Selection of the Beamline Source Location .......................................................... 38 3.1.3 Installation of the Neutron Beamline .................................................................... 41 3.1.4 Gas Pressure Control System ............................................................................... 43 3.2 Radiation Beamstop .................................................................................................... 44 3.2.1 Beamstop Modeling and Design ........................................................................... 44 3.2.2 Construction of the Beamstop .............................................................................. 50 3.3 Experiment Station ...................................................................................................... 51 3.3.1 Optical Table and Vibration Isolation ................................................................... 51 3.3.2 Experiment Enclosure .......................................................................................... 53 3.3.3 Motorized Sample Stage ...................................................................................... 56 3.4 Neutron-Sensitive Multi-Channel Plate Detector ......................................................... 57 3.5 Computer Control System ........................................................................................... 60 4 MCNP MODEL OF THE BEAMLINE ............................................................................ 66 4.1 Experimental Verification of the Beamline Model ....................................................... 70 5 CHARACTERIZATION AND DEMONSTRATION OF THE NEW FACILITY ............. 75 5.1 Characterization of the New Beamline ........................................................................ 75 5.2 Demonstration of the New Neutron Radiography Capabilities ..................................... 78 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................. 90 7 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK .............................................................. 92 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 95 APPENDIX A – MCNP Model of the Neutron Beamline ........................................................ 101 APPENDIX B – Procedures for the Neutron Imaging Facility ................................................. 109 APPENDIX C – 50.59 Review for a Neutron Imaging Facility at the GSTR ........................... 121 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1. Qualitative representation of x-ray and neutron cross-sections. .................................. 6 Figure 2.2. Qualitative representation of x-ray and neutron cross-sections
Recommended publications
  • X-Ray and Optical Diagnostic Beamlines at the Australian Synchrotron Storage Ring
    Proceedings of EPAC 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland THPLS002 X-RAY AND OPTICAL DIAGNOSTIC BEAMLINES AT THE AUSTRALIAN SYNCHROTRON STORAGE RING M. J. Boland, A. C. Walsh, G. S. LeBlanc, Y.-R. E. Tan, R. Dowd and M. J. Spencer, Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. Abstract powerful diagnostic tool which will deliver data to the Two diagnostic beamlines have been designed and machine group as well as information to the machine constructed for the Australian Synchrotron Storage Ring status display for the users. [1]. One diagnostic beamline is a simple x-ray pinhole General Layout camera system, with a BESSY II style pinhole array [2], designed to measure the beam divergence, size and Fig. 1. shows the schematic layout of the XDB with a stability. The second diagnostic beamline uses an optical sketch of the expected beam profile measurement. Both chicane to extract the visible light from the photon beam diagnostic beamlines have dipole source points. The and transports it to various instruments. The end-station electron beam parameters for the source points are shown of the optical diagnostic beamline is equipped with a Table 1. for storage ring with the nominal lattice of zero streak camera, a fast ICCD camera, a CCD camera and a dispersion in the straights and assuming 1% coupling. Fill Pattern Monitor to analyse and optimise the electron Table 1: Electron beam parameters at the source points. beam using the visible synchrotron light. Parameter ODB XDB β x (m) 0.386 0.386 MOTIVATION β y (m) 32.507 32.464 The Storage Ring diagnostic beamlines were desiged to σx (μm) 99 98 serve two essential functions: σx′ (μrad) 240 241 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 40 Years of Beam at Triumf
    BEAMTIME News from Canada’s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics spriNg 2015 | Volume 12 issue 1 Celebrating inside this issue 40 Years of Beam 04 ForTY Years oN 06 FirsT 40 Years at TriumF oF TriumF sCieNCe 08 Ariel e-liNaC 10 ariel sCieNCe program 12 NeWs & aNNouNCemeNTs 14 ProFile Michael Craddock 15 CommerCializaTioN spring Editor: marcello pavan Production: serengeti Design group Beamtime is available online at: www.triumf.ca/home/for-media/ publicationsgallery/newsletter Inquiries or comments to: [email protected] © 2015 TRIUMF Beamtime All Rights Reserved TriumF 4004 Wesbrook Mall Vancouver, BC V6T 2A3 Canada +1 604 222 1047 telephone +1 604 222 1074 fax www.triumf.ca To obtain Beamtime by PDF, sign up at http://lists.triumf.ca/mailman/list- info/triumf-publications TRIUMF is funded by a contribution through the National Research Council of Canada. The province of British Columbia provides capital funding for the construction of buildings for the TRIUMF Laboratory. Director’s VoiCe 3 Jonathan Bagger | Director, TRIUMF Forty Years of reliability Just imagine the excitement and sense of achievement that must have swept through TRIUMF forty years ago, when TRIUMF’s rich the first beam was extracted from the main cyclotron! “history serves An extraordinary feat of engineering, TRIUMF’s 500 MeV cyclotron remains at the as a foundation heart of the laboratory. A machine so robust that it continues to drive cutting-edge on which to build science some four decades later, even being recognized as an Engineering Milestone by the IEEE. new capabilities And that first beam really was just the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) Project
    Department of Energy Project Management Workshop 2016 “Enhancing Project Management” National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS‐II) Project Frank J. Crescenzo, Federal Project Director Office of Science ‐ Brookhaven Site Office NSLS‐II Project • Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SRF) • 10,000 times brighter than NSLS with ultra‐low emittance and exceptional beam stability • Delivers world leading capability to image single atoms • Total Project Cost (TPC) = $912M, TEC= $791.2M; OPC=$120.8M • $150M ARRA accelerated funding profile (did not increase TPC) • LINAC, 3.0 GeV Booster, 500mA Storage Ring 791.5m circumference • 7 Insertion Device Beamlines (ultimate capability for over 60 beamlines) • Various buildings totaling 628,000 gross square feet • Completed 6 months early, added $68M scope from CD‐2 baseline Injector & Storage Ring LINAC BOOSTER STORAGE RING INSERTION DEVICE Beamlines & Endstations CSX Beamline XPD Endstation CHX Endstation HXN Endstation NSLS‐II Floor Plan L‐ LINAC B‐ Booster RF‐ RF facility 1‐5 – Pendant # Why Was This Project Successful? • Basic Energy Science’s (project sponsor) commitment to project success • Laboratory commitment to project success • Excellent Integrated Project Team • Project team’s technical capabilities 6 Thanks! Steven Dierker Laboratory Project Director Aesook Byon Laboratory Deputy Project Director Robert Caradonna Deputy Federal Project Director Phillip Kraushaar Program Manager, SC‐BES 7 Back‐up Slides 8 National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS‐II) Project Storage Ring Lab Office Building (LOB) Satellite Beamline Endstation Building Frank Crescenzo –FPD CD‐4 Achieved March 19, 2015 Brookhaven Site Office (BHSO) Schedule Funding Profile 11 Project Costs WBS WBS Name At CD‐2 Added Scope Final Contingency Utilization Contingency was used primarily for project support which was underestimated and augmented 1.01 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $52,506 $4,743 $69,752 to execute scope additions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Radiological Situation in the Beam-Cleaning Sections of the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) I I CHAPTER 5 Benchmark Measurements
    Markus Brugger The Radiological Situation in the Beam-Cleaning Sections of the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Technischen Wissenschaften eingereicht an der Technischen Universität Graz Rechbauerstraße 12 A - 8010 Graz CERN-THESIS-2003-039 //2003 Begutachter: Ao.Univ.-Prof. Dr.techn. Ewald Schachinger Institut fur Theoretische Physik der TU Graz Graz, November 2003 Kurzfassung Diese Dissertation beschäftigt sich mit radiologischen Aspekten am "Large Hadron Collider", welcher momentan am CERN gebaut wird. Im Detail handelt es sich dabei um die beiden so genannten "Beam Cleaning Insertions", jene Bereiche in welchen man versucht möglichst alle Teilchen zu absorbieren, welche ansonsten in anderen Teilen des Beschleunigers zu Schäden führen könnten. Es werden zwei kritische Aspekte des Strahlenschutzes behandelt: Dosisleistung durch induzierte Radioaktivität und die Aktivierung von Luft. Die Anpassung des Designs dieser Regionen in Verbindung mit einer detaillierten Abschätzung der jeweiligen Dosisleistungen ist von großer Wichtigkeit für spätere Wartungsarbeiten. Bisher standen lediglich sehr eingeschränkte Studien über die in jenen Regionen zu erwartenden Strahlenniveaus zur Verfügung, welche diese Dissertation nun zu erweitern und vervollständigen sucht. Dabei wird eine neue Methode angewendet um Dosisleistungen zu bestimmen, welche, da sie zum ersten Mal zu deren Berechnung verwendet wird, sorgfältig im Rahmen eines Experimentes überprüft wird. Zusätzlich stellt die Aktivierung der Luft einen wichtigen Aspekt für die Inbetriebnahme des Beschleunigers dar. Jüngste Änderungen im Konzept des Beschleunigers, machen eine Revision vorhandener Ergebnisse und eine umfassende neue Studie notwendig. Die Ergebnisse von beiden Studien sind von großer Wichtigkeit für die weiteren Entscheidungen bezüglich des endgültigen Entwurfs der "Beam Cleaning Insertions".
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Energy Resolved Neutron Imaging Detector Based On
    A novel energy resolved neutron imaging detector based on TPX3Cam for the CSNS Jianqing Yang1,2,3, Jianrong Zhou2,3,4*, Xingfen Jiang2,3,4, Jinhao Tan2,3,5, Lianjun Zhang2,3,5, Jianjin Zhou2,3, Xiaojuan Zhou2,3,Wenqin Yang2,3,4,Yuanguang Xia2,3, Jie Chen2,3, XinLi Sun1, Quanhu Zhang1**, Zhijia Sun2,3,4***, Yuanbo Chen2,3,4 1. Xi’an Research Institute of Hi-Tech, 710025, Xian,China. 2. Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan, 523803, Guangdong, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; 4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 5. Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150000 Abstract: The China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) operates in pulsed mode and has a high neutron flux. This provides opportunities for energy resolved neutron imaging by using the TOF (Time Of Flight) approach. An Energy resolved neutron imaging instrument (ERNI) is being built at the CSNS but significant challenges for the detector persist because it simultaneously requires a spatial resolution of less than 100 μm, as well as a microsecond-scale timing resolution. This study constructs a prototype of an energy resolved neutron imaging detector based on the fast optical camera, TPX3Cam coupled with an image intensifier. To evaluate its performance, a series of proof of principle experiments were performed in the BL20 at the CSNS to measure the spatial resolution and the neutron wavelength spectrum, and perform neutron imaging with sliced wavelengths and Bragg edge imaging of the steel sample.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Report Jülich High
    General Allgemeines ual Design Report ual Design Report Concept Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source Source Jülich High Brilliance Neutron 8 Conceptual Design Report Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source (HBS) T. Brückel, T. Gutberlet (Eds.) J. Baggemann, S. Böhm, P. Doege, J. Fenske, M. Feygenson, A. Glavic, O. Holderer, S. Jaksch, M. Jentschel, S. Kleefisch, H. Kleines, J. Li, K. Lieutenant,P . Mastinu, E. Mauerhofer, O. Meusel, S. Pasini, H. Podlech, M. Rimmler, U. Rücker, T. Schrader, W. Schweika, M. Strobl, E. Vezhlev, J. Voigt, P. Zakalek, O. Zimmer Allgemeines / General Allgemeines / General Band / Volume 8 Band / Volume 8 ISBN 978-3-95806-501-7 ISBN 978-3-95806-501-7 T. Brückel, T. Gutberlet (Eds.) Gutberlet T. Brückel, T. Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source (HBS) 1 100 mA proton ion source 2 70 MeV linear accelerator 5 3 Proton beam multiplexer system 5 4 Individual neutron target stations 4 5 Various instruments in the experimental halls 3 5 4 2 1 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 4 5 5 Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Allgemeines / General Band / Volume 8 CONTENT I. Executive summary 7 II. Foreword 11 III. Rationale 13 1. Neutron provision 13 1.1 Reactor based fission neutron sources 14 1.2 Spallation neutron sources 15 1.3 Accelerator driven neutron sources 15 2. Neutron landscape 16 3. Baseline design 18 3.1 Comparison to existing sources 19 IV. Science case 21 1. Chemistry 24 2. Geoscience 25 3. Environment 26 4. Engineering 27 5. Information and quantum technologies 28 6. Nanotechnology 29 7. Energy technology 30 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Beamline CDR Template
    LT-XFD_CDR_XPD-00118 NSLS-II Project CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT for the COHERENT HARD X-RAY BEAMLINE AT NSLS-II final draft Sep 2009 NSLS-II Project, Brookhaven National Laboratory Intentionally blank. ii September 2009 Conceptual Design Report for the Coherent Hard X-Ray (CHX) Beamline at NSLS-II Approvals and Reviewers Compiled by Signature Date Andrei Fluerasu, CHX Beamline Scientist, NSLS-II Approved Qun Shen, XFD Director, NSLS-II Reviewers Robert L. Leheny, BAT Spokesperson, on behalf of the BAT Andy Broadbent, Beamlines Manager Nicholas Gmür, ESH Coordinator, NSLS-II Sushil Sharma, Mechanical Engineering Group Leader, NSLS-II Document Updates The Conceptual Design Report for the Coherent Hard X-ray Beamline at NSLS-II is a controlled document, revised under change control. Version No. Date Changes made A 5/13/2009 Initial draft, submitted to BAT B 9/16/2009 Second submittal to BAT, and first to editing 1 10/1/2009 Final draft, submitted to BAT September 2009 iii NSLS-II Project, Brookhaven National Laboratory Intentionally blank. iv September 2009 Conceptual Design Report for the Coherent Hard X-Ray (CHX) Beamline at NSLS-II Contents 1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Scientific Requirements .........................................................................................................................1 Glassy Dynamics in Soft Matter.............................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Beam and Detectors
    Beam and detectors Beamline for schools 2018 Preface All the big discoveries in science have started by curious minds asking simple questions: How? Why? This is how you should start. Then you should investigate with the help of this document whether this question could be answered with the available equipment (or with material that you can provide) and the experimental setup of the Beamline for Schools at CERN. As your proposal takes shape, you will be learning a lot about particle physics, detectors, data acquisition, data analysis, statistics and much more. You will not be alone during this journey: there is a list of volunteer physicists who are happy to interact with you and to provide you with additional information and advice. Remember: It is not necessary to propose a very ambitious experiment to succeed in the Beamline for Schools competition. We are looking for exciting and original ideas! Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 The Beamline for Schools ......................................................................................................................... 3 Typical equipment .................................................................................................................................... 4 Trigger and
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Neutron Instrument Beamline Construction
    SNS NFDD PM-LL-0001-R02 LESSONS LEARNED FROM NEUTRON INSTRUMENT BEAMLINE CONSTRUCTION December 2009 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. i SNS NFDD PM-LL-0001-R02 LESSONS LEARNED FROM NEUTRON INSTRUMENT BEAMLINE CONSTRUCTION December 2009 Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory for UT-BATTELLE, LLC under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ii Beam Line Lessons Learned System Integration Design Criteria Document (DCD) – Insure that this document clearly states all requirements for the project (including interfaces), that it is reviewed by all appropriate personnel, and signed off by the instrument customer(s). The document should be kept up to date so that the engineering team is always designing to the criteria – not rumor or latest desires. Baseline Debut – Soon after the DCD and P&ID have been drafted, the instrument scientist should present his/her vision of the instrument function, equipment, and operation to a panel consisting of the engineering team, management, key IDT members and other appropriate scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1408.0753V1 [Physics.Ins-Det]
    Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline at the Spallation Neutron Source at ORNL N. Fomin1, G. L. Greene1,2, R. Allen2 , V. Cianciolo2, C. Crawford3, T. Ito7, P. R. Huffman2,4, E. B. Iverson2, R. Mahurin5, W. M. Snow6 1University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA 2Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA 3University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA 4North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA 5University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 6Indiana University and Center for the Exploration of Energy and Matter, Bloomington, IN, USA 7Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA Abstract We describe the Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline (FnPB) facility located at the Spal- lation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The FnPB was designed for the con- duct of experiments that investigate scientific issues in nuclear physics, particle physics, and astrophysics and cosmology using a pulsed slow neutron beam. We present a detailed descrip- tion of the design philosophy, beamline components, and measured fluxes of the polychromatic and monochromatic beams. 1. Introduction Cold neutrons and ultracold neutrons (UCN) have been employed in a wide variety of experi- ments that shed light on important issues in nuclear, particle, and astrophysics. These include the determination of fundamental constants, the study of fundamental symmetry violation, searches for new interactions in nature and tests of the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics. Their special combination of properties make them a good choice to address the expanded list of funda- mental scientific mysteries which now confront us in the wake of the discoveries of dark matter and dark energy, which shows that 95% of the energy content of the universe resides in some un- known form.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Beamline Radiation Shielding Design at the National Synchrotron Light Source II
    Guidelines for Beamline Radiation Shielding Design at the National Synchrotron Light Source II Wah-Keat Lee, Razvan Popescu, Zhenghua Xia, Steve Ehrlich and P. K. Job Table of Contents 1. NSLS-II RADIATION SHIELDING POLICY ............................................................................... 4 2. RADIATION SOURCE PARAMETERS AND SHIELDING DESIGN SIMULATIONS........................ 4 3. GENERAL PERSONNEL PROTECTION SYSTEMS GUIDELINES ................................................ 5 4. THERMAL MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 5 5. RAY TRACES ....................................................................................................................... 6 6. GUIDELINES FOR STOPS, COLLIMATORS AND SHUTTERS ................................................. 6 6.1 Primary bremsstrahlung stops, collimators and white beam shutters ........................... 6 6.2 Integral primary bremsstrahlung stop with pink/monochromatic beam apertures ....... 7 6.3 Pink beam shutters/stops ............................................................................................ 8 6.4 Monochromatic beam shutters/stops .......................................................................... 8 7. GUIDELINES FOR SHIELDED ENCLOSURES .......................................................................... 9 7.1 White beam enclosures (or First Optical Enclosures) .................................................... 9 7.2 Monochromatic beam enclosures .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Imaging- a Nondestructive Diagnostic Tool for Material Science
    Presents: Muhammad Abir, Ph.D. Imaging Specialist Phoenix, LLC Neutron Imaging- A Nondestructive Diagnostic Tool for Material Science Abstract: Neutron imaging is a powerful non-invasive technique in various applications for probing the internal structure of much thicker objects as well as for imaging of low Z materials. Particularly in situations, where penetration through x-rays is difficult, neutron imaging plays an important role. Manufacturers of complex parts through additive manufacturing processes or large high-density items that may not be well suited to x-rays finds the benefits of neutron imaging intriguing. Manufacturers of composite materials, turbine blade manufacturers, and manufacturers utilizing investment casting techniques are also interested to see how neutron radiography can find residual ceramic core material leftover from chemical leaching and dissolving processes. Neutrons are generated either from a neutron generating isotope (e.g. UW Madison nuclear reactor) in a reactor facility or from a deuterium-deuterium or deuterium- tritium neutron generator (e.g. Phoenix) or proton accelerator (e.g. SNS at ORNL). Depending on neutron energies, different neutron imaging systems can be developed. Usually the high- resolution (less than 10 µm) neutron imaging systems are developed with cold neutrons while the medium-resolution (usually 10 µm- 200 µm) neutron imaging systems can be developed with thermal neutrons. For dense samples that are not easily penetrable, mm-range resolution neutron imaging systems can be developed using fast neutrons. With the combination of X-ray and neutron imaging, the fusion between X-ray and neutron imaging can provide more insight about the materials. This talk will discuss Dr.
    [Show full text]