DOCSLIB.ORG

Independent Evaluation of Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Independent Evaluation of Project Independent Evaluation of Project “Support to National Peacebuilding Priorities in Enhancing the Capacity of Human Rights Institutions and Entities in Liberia” (Funded by Peacebuilding Fund/Peacebuilding Support Office) Final Evaluation Report An external Consultant has prepared this report. The views expressed herein therefore do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of OHCHR. December 2019 Yagya Bikram Shahi i Evaluation Team Mr. Yagya Bikram Shahi is the chairperson of a development consulting firm - Devsuits in Nepal and is an international consultant who has been involved in managing human rights projects supported by several development partners, such as the governments or aid agencies of Australia, Denmark, EU, Finland, Germany, Norway, Switzerland, the UK and the USA for more than 10 years. He has also worked with UNDP, UNFPA, UN Women and OHCHR for seven years and managed two OHCHR projects funded by Peacebuilding Fund in Nepal and in Uganda. Mr. Shahi oversaw the evaluation of more than 50 projects on human rights, transitional justice and peacebuilding; and evaluated more than a dozen projects on human rights, peacebuilding, community mediation, etc. in Nepal, Liberia and South Sudan. He is trained on project cycle management from MDF, the Netherlands. Mr. Shahi led the final evaluation of the project. Ms. Martin Wiles Mardea, Monitoring and Evaluation Officer and Mr. Daniel Melvin Nyanway, Human Rights Officer from OHCHR Liberia provided necessary substantive information and documents on the project implementation and facilitated the interactions with key project stakeholders, beneficiaries and arranged field visits. Evaluation Managers Dr. Uchenna Emelonye, Country Representative, OHCHR Liberia Mr. Sonny Onyegbula, Human Rights Officer, OHCHR Liberia Mr. Sabas Monroy, Evaluation Officer, PPMES, OHCHR Geneva Mr. Bradford C. Smith, Human Rights Officer, FOTCD, Africa Section II, OHCHR Geneva Mr. John R. Dennis, Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist, Peacebuilding Fund Secretariat, Liberia ii Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ vii 1. Background and Context ........................................................................................................................... 1 Background .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Evaluation Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 4 Purpose of the evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 4 Evaluation scope ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Evaluation design and methodology ......................................................................................................... 4 Evaluation tools ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Evaluation activities ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Limitations of the evaluation ...................................................................................................................... 6 3. Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Relevance ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Effectiveness ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Efficiency ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Sustainability................................................................................................................................................ 11 Initial impact ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Gender equality and human rights ......................................................................................................... 13 4. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................ 14 5. Lessons Learnt and Recommendations ................................................................................................ 15 Lessons Learnt ........................................................................................................................................... 15 Recommendations to national stakeholders ....................................................................................... 15 Recommendations to OHCHR .............................................................................................................. 16 Recommendations to PBF/PBSO ........................................................................................................... 17 6. Annexes ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 A. Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................................. 18 I. Background ............................................................................................................................................. 18 II. Purpose (and use of the evaluation) .................................................................................................. 20 iii III. Objectives of the assignment .......................................................................................................... 21 IV. Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 21 V. Evaluation questions and criteria ....................................................................................................... 23 VI. Evaluation design (process and methods ............................................................................................ 26 VI. Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 27 VII. Stakeholder participation................................................................................................................. 28 VIII. Time frame.......................................................................................................................................... 28 IX. Expected deliverables ....................................................................................................................... 31 X. Management of evaluation ............................................................................................................... 34 XI. Evaluation team composition, skills and experiences................................................................ 34 XII. Ethical code of conduct ................................................................................................................... 35 I. Annexes ................................................................................................................................................... 36 B. List of documents reviewed ............................................................................................................... 61 C. List of people consulted ..................................................................................................................... 62 D. Evaluation tools .................................................................................................................................... 67 E. Survey tables and charts ...................................................................................................................... 76 iv Abbreviations and Acronyms CO Country Office CS Civil Society CSO Civil Society Organization CSO Platform Civil Society Human Rights Advocacy Platform DAC Development Assistance Committee DEXREL Donor and External Relations ESC(R) Economic, Social and Cultural (Rights) EU European Union FGD Focus Group Discussion FGM Female Genital Mutilation FOTCD Field Operations and Technical Cooperation Division GEHR Gender Equality and Human Rights GJRP Global Justice and Research Project HP Harmful Practice(s) HRPS Human Rights Protection Services INCHR Independent National Commission on Human Rights KII Key Informant Interview LGBTIQ Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer LMPTF Liberia Multi-Partner Trust Fund LNBA Liberia National Bar Association MOGCSP Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection MOJ Ministry of Justice NHRAP
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nimba's Profile
    Nimba’s Profile The Flag of Nimba County: - (Valor, Purity and Fidelity reflected in the stripes) Nimba was part of the central province of Liberia which included Bong and Lofa. It became a full-fledged county in 1964 when President William V.S. Tubman changed the provinces into counties. Nimba became one of the original nine counties of Liberia. Over the years, other sub-divisions have been added making the total of 15 counties. Nimba is located in the North-East Region of the country. The size of Nimba is 4,650 square miles. In his book, Liberia Facing Mount Nimba, Dr. Nya Kwiawon Taryor, Sr. revealed that the name of the county "Nimba", originated from "Nenbaa ton" which means slippery mountain where beautiful young girls slip and fall. Mount Nimba is the highest mountain in Liberia. Nimba is the second largest county in Liberia in terms of population. Before the civil war in 1989, there were over 313,050 people in the county according to the 1984 census. Now Nimba Population has increased to 462,026. Nimba is also one of the richest in Liberia. It has the largest deposit of high grade iron ore. Other natural resources found in Nimba are gold, diamonds, timber, etc. In the late 50's, Nimba's huge iron ore reserve was exploited by LAMCO-the Liberian-American Swedish Mining Company. A considerable portion of Liberia's Gross Domestic Product, GDP, was said to have been generated from revenues from Nimba's iron ore for several years. The Flag of Nimba County: - (Valor, Purity and Fidelity reflected in the stripes) There are negotiations going on for a new contract for the iron ore in Nimba.
    [Show full text]
  • TRC of Liberia Final Report Volum Ii
    REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME II: CONSOLIDATED FINAL REPORT This volume constitutes the final and complete report of the TRC of Liberia containing findings, determinations and recommendations to the government and people of Liberia Volume II: Consolidated Final Report Table of Contents List of Abbreviations <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<............. i Acknowledgements <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<... iii Final Statement from the Commission <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<............... v Quotations <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 1 1.0 Executive Summary <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 2 1.1 Mandate of the TRC <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 2 1.2 Background of the Founding of Liberia <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<... 3 1.3 History of the Conflict <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<................ 4 1.4 Findings and Determinations <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 6 1.5 Recommendations <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<... 12 1.5.1 To the People of Liberia <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 12 1.5.2 To the Government of Liberia <<<<<<<<<<. <<<<<<. 12 1.5.3 To the International Community <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 13 2.0 Introduction <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 14 2.1 The Beginning <<................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Profile of Commissioners of the TRC of Liberia <<<<<<<<<<<<.. 14 2.3 Profile of International Technical Advisory Committee <<<<<<<<<. 18 2.4 Secretariat and Specialized Staff <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 20 2.5 Commissioners, Specialists, Senior Staff, and Administration <<<<<<.. 21 2.5.1 Commissioners <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 22 2.5.2 International Technical Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Where Have All the (Qualified) Teachers Gone?
    African Educational Research Journal Vol. 6(2), pp. 30-47, April 2018 DOI: 10.30918/AERJ.62.18.013 ISSN: 2354-2160 Full Length Research Paper Where have all the (qualified) teachers gone? Implications for measuring sustainable development goal target 4.c from a study of teacher supply, demand and deployment in Liberia Mark Ginsburg*, Noor Ansari, Oscar N. Goyee, Rachel Hatch, Emmanuel Morris and Delwlebo Tuowal 1University of Maryland, USA. 2Universidad de Ciencias Pedagógicas Enrique José Varona, Cuba. Accepted 3 April, 2018 ABSTRACT This paper analyzes data collected in the 2013 Liberian Annual School Census undertaken as part of the Educational Management Information System and supplemented by information gathered from teacher education program organizers as well as from samples of graduates from preservice and inservice C- Certificate granting programs undertaken in Liberia in during 2007 to 2013. The authors report that the percentage of “qualified” primary school teachers (that is, those with at least a C-Certificate, which Liberian policy sets as the minimum qualification) expanded dramatically after the education system was decimated during the years of civil war (1989 to 2003). We also indicate that in government primary schools in 2013, the pupil-teacher ratio (24.8) and even the pupil-qualified teacher ratio (36.2) was lower – that is, better – than the policy goal of 44 pupils per teacher. However, teacher hiring and deployment decisions led to large inequalities in these input measures of educational quality. At the same time, the authors discovered that the findings from the analysis of Liberia’s 2013 EMIS data did not fully answer the question of where the (qualified) teachers are, in that we were not able to locate in the EMIS database substantial numbers of graduates of the various C-Certificate teacher education programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Empowering Youth, Opening up Perspectives - Employment Promotion As a Contribution to Peace Consolidation in South-East Liberia
    SLE Publication Series – S… SLE Publication Series – S251 Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung (SLE) – Centre for Rural Development Study commissioned by Welthungerhilfe in collaboration with the German Financial Cooperation-funded Reintegration and Recovery Program (RRP) and its partners IBIS and medica mondiale Liberia Empowering Youth, Opening up Perspectives - Employment Promotion as a Contribution to Peace Consolidation in South-East Liberia Dr. Ekkehard Kürschner (Teamleader), Joscha Albert, Emil Gevorgyan, Eva Jünemann, Elisabetta Mina, Jonathan Julius Ziebula Monrovia / Berlin, December 2012 Foreword i Foreword SLE Publication Series S251 For 50 years, the Centre for Rural Development (SLE - Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, trains young professionals for the field of German and international development cooperation. Editor Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Three-month practical projects conducted on behalf of German and international Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung (SLE) organisations in development cooperation form an integral part of the one-year Hessische Straße 1-2 postgraduate course. In interdisciplinary teams and under the guidance of an 10115 Berlin experienced team leader, young professionals carry out assignments on innovative Tel.: 0049-30-2093 6900 future-oriented topics, providing consultant support to the commissioning FAX: 0049-30-2093 6904 organisations. Involving a diverse range of actors in the process is of great [email protected] importance here, i.e. surveys from household level to decision makers and experts at www.sle-berlin.de national level. The outputs of this “applied research” directly contribute to solving specific development problems. Editorial Dr. Karin Fiege, SLE The studies are mostly linked to rural development (incl. management of natural resources, climate change, food security or agriculture), the cooperation with fragile or least developed countries (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final report October 2019-March 2020 Grand Bassa, Grand Cape Mount, Rural Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe Counties 2 ACKNOWLEGEMENTS The Link NCA in Grand Bassa, Grand Cape Mount, Rural Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe Counties was commissioned by the Liberian Wash Consortium and funded by Irish Aid. The study was conducted by Link NCA Analyst, Grace Heymsfield, under the supervision of Lenka Blanárová, Senior Nutrition Assessment Coordinator, Action Against Hunger UK, and the study’s focal points: Tom Health (Action Against Hunger France WASH Technical Adviser) and Michael Slewion Doe (Consortium Coordinator), with valuable contributions from the pool of Technical Advisors at Action Against Hunger, France, namely Fabienne Rousseau, Xuan Phan and Janis Differt; Tekar Jallah-Bundor, Action Against Hunger Liberia Nutrition and Health Program Manager, and Mohamed Takoy, Action Against Hunger Liberia Country Representative. The Link NCA team wishes to express their thanks to all those who have contributed to this study and/or facilitated its development, in particular the qualitative and quantitative study teams for their expertise and sense of humor.1 A special thank you to: • G. Tarnue Brooks, Action Against Hunger M&E Officer, for his constant encouragement and immense support co-managing the Risk Factor Survey; • Two additional team members who ‘Linked’ both stages of the study, propelling the study forward with their qualitative and quantitative experience: Paul Sahr Johnson & Joseph N. Davis- Qualitative Research Assistants, Quantitative Supervisors; To Dr. Annette Brima- Davis, Director, Nutrition Division, and Mameni Linga Morli, National SUN Focal Point, for their support of the study, as well as the Grand Cape Mount, Grand Bassa, Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe County Health Teams, for their tireless efforts and partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • View First Project Report
    ACRONYMS AIFO Associazione Italiana Amici di Raoul Follereau ALM American Leprosy Missions CHOs County Health Officers CHT County Health Team CBR Community Based Rehabilitation CCCs Community Care Centers DHOs District Health Officers EPHS Essential Package of Health Services ETUs Ebola Treatment Units EVD Ebola Virus Disease GLRA German Leprosy Relief Association GCHVs General Community Health Volunteers IGAs Income Generating Activities LFPs Leprosy Focal Persons LDHS Liberia Demographic Health Survey MoH Ministry of Health MAP Medical Assistance Program NLTCP National Leprosy and Tuberculosis Control Programme NCD National Commission on Disabilities OICs Officer in Charge PHCs Primary Health Care Staff SHGs Self Help Groups 2 WHO World Health Organization 1. PROJECT TITLE AND GENERAL INFOS Project Title: “Support for the Strategic Plan for the Fight against Leprosy in South EastLiberia” Location: Liberia (West Africa). In 5 Counties: Nimba, Grand Gedeh, River Gee, Grand Kru and Maryland. Dioceses: Diocese of Gbarnga (County of Bong) and of Cape Palmas (County of Maryland). Local partner: Congregation of the Missionary Sisters of the Consolata in Liberia. Other partners: Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW), and National Commission on Disabilities (NCD) Sectors: Health, socio - economic and education. Duration: 3 Years Start date: 1st October, 2014 Overall objective: To contribute to strengthening the national health system in the five counties of the south-east (Grand Gedeh, Sinoe, River Gee, Grand Kru and Maryland) as provided by the "Strategic Plan on Leprosy 2013-2017" of the Ministry of Health. Specific objectives: 1) Increase the quantity, quality and access to services for the identification and treatment of leprosy provided by primary health centers in the communities involved in the project through specific training of medical and paramedical staff.
    [Show full text]
  • FGM in Liberia: Sande (2014)
    7 0 Registered Charity: No. 1150379 Limited Company: No: 08122211 E-mail: [email protected] © 28 Too Many 2019 Second Edition Efua Dorkenoo OBE 1949–2014 28 Too Many dedicates this report to Efua Dorkenoo. A courageous and inspirational campaigner, Efua worked tirelessly for women’s and girls’ rights and to create an African-led global movement to end Female Genital Mutilation. 2 Contents Foreword to the 2014 Edition .................................................... 5 Case Study: Blessing ................................................................... 6 Foreword to the 2019 Edition .................................................... 7 Information on Country Profiles ................................................ 8 Background ............................................................................................................................... 8 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Use of This Country Profile ....................................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 9 The Team .................................................................................................................................. 9 List of Abbreviations ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Issues Emanating from Traditional Practices in Liberia
    UNMIL UNITED NATIONS MISSION IN LIBERIA An Assessment of Human Rights Issues Emanating from Traditional Practices in Liberia Table of Contents 1. Executive summary .................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 3. Methodology and constraints .................................................................................... 3 4. Overview of traditional and cultural societies and practices in Liberia ............... 4 5. Legal and policy framework related to traditional and cultural practices .......... 6 5.1. International and regional human rights framework ................................................. 6 5.2. Domestic legal and policy framework for the protection of human rights in the context of cultural practices ................................................................................................... 10 5.3. Challenges in the legal and normative framework .................................................... 13 5.3.1. The Hinterland Regulations ..................................................................................... 13 5.3.2. “Positive Culture” in Liberian law .......................................................................... 14 5.3.3. Perceptions of human rights among traditional actors and communities ................ 15 6. Human rights abuses emanating from cultural and traditional practices ......... 15 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Comprehensive Prevention Strategy
    COMPREHENSIVE SEXUAL AND GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE PREVENTION STRATEGY FOR LIBERIA NOVEMBER 2019 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUctiON 2 1.1 The Spotlight Initiative and the Comprehensive Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Prevention Strategy 2 2. Background to sexual and gender-Based VIOLENCE IN LIBERIA 3 3. METHODOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE SEXUAL AND gender-Based Violence strategy 7 3.1 Primary and secondary data collection 7 3.2 Limitations 8 4. SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS FROM PRIMARY DATA COLLEctiON 9 5. NATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE PREVENTION OF sexual and gender-Based Violence 17 5.1 Principles and approaches 17 5.2 Vision 18 5.3 Implementation plan and communication strategy 18 5.4 Lessons learned and best practices for community interventions 19 5.5 The socioecological framework as framework for the Strategy 20 6. OBJEctiVE OF THE StRATEGY: ‘SOCIAL NORMS, STRUctURES AND PRActicE ARE IN PLACE TO PREVENT SGBV AND HP AND FACILITATE AccESS TO SRHRS’ 23 7. Recommendations to facilitate implementation OF THE StRATEGY 24 8. THE ActORS IMPLEMENTING THE StRATEGY 25 10. REFERENCES 28 11. APPENDICES 30 Appendix 1: Key questions 30 Appendix 2: Organizations and institutions met 32 Appendix 3: Implementation Plan of the Prevention Strategy 33 Appendix 4: Liberia Comprehensive Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Prevention Strategy: Monitoring and evaluation framework 39 ON DUCTI ro T N Acronyms and abbreviations 1. I 1. CSO CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION DV DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FGD FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION FGM FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Chronic Food Insecurity in Liberia
    Assessment of Chronic Food Insecurity in Liberia Analysis Coordination Analysis Partners Liberia Agribusiness Development Activity (LADA) June 2017 This publication was prepared under the United States Agency for International Development Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Indefinite Quantity Contract, AID-OAA-I-12-00006. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Assessment of Chronic Food Insecurity in Liberia June 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Summary of Classification Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 3 Food Consumption Quality ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Food Consumption Quantity ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Nutrition .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Infrastructure and Inclusive Growth the AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP
    Liberia Infrastructure and Inclusive Growth THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP This report has been prepared by the African Development Bank (AfDB) Group. Designations employed in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the institution concerning the legal status of any country, or the limitation of its frontier. While efforts have been made to present reliable information, the AfDB accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences of its use. Vice President: Zondo Sakala Regional Director: Franck Perrault Chief Country Economist (at the time): Stefan Muller Senior Country Economist: Patrick Hettinger Resident Representative: Margaret Kilo Consultants: Andy Dijkerman, Emmanuel Akpa Copyright 2013 - AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP Photo Credits: AfDB photo files, Graham Prentice, United Nations Liberia Office, Map of Liberia courtesy of Nations Online Project. PUBLISHED BY Temporary Relocation Agency (TRA) B.P. 323-1002 Tunis Belvedere, Tunisia Tel: (216) 7110-2876 Fax: (216) 7110-3779 Website: www.afdb.org Foreword he African Development Bank views poor and the related infrastructure investment priorities that infrastructure as a critical barrier to reducing can best bring Liberia out of its relative isolation. These T poverty and accelerating growth on the continent. will enable Liberia to play a larger role on an agricultural Concurrently, African leaders increasingly realize the trading stage within the Mano River Union, on a regional advantages of regional cooperation and countries are stage within the ECOWAS energy, communications and placing greater emphasis on accelerating integration transit trade markets and on a globally competitive stage through policies and infrastructure. However, countries as an attractive investment destination for manufacturing, recovering from prolonged periods of conflict or troubled mining and agro-industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021 Liberia Landscape Paper and Maps
    The 2021 Liberia Landscape Paper and Maps Friends of Liberia is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, based in Washington, DC. Our members live throughout the world and in several foreign countries. Anyone who donates to support the organization shares the mission, vision, and values is a member. These may be found at https://fol.org/about-us/. Address Tel / Cel Website ___________ ________ _________ Friends Of Liberia +1 202 546 0139 www.fol.org 1050 15th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 P a g e | 1 A Statement About the Importance of Literacy from CODE, Canadian Organization For Development Through Education "Education is one of the fundamental battles to wage in our society. It's the moral duty to the generations.......Antonia Guterres, UN Secretary General UNDERSTANDING LITERACY A Brighter Future Written words are the gateway to knowledge, empowerment and opportunity; the way to a brighter future. Despite all the many benefits of literacy in the developing world more than half of all children (ages 6-14) are not achieving minimum proficiency levels in reading---and globally 750 million adults are illiterate. The global literacy crisis is holding up progress in all areas of development, from health and education to gender equality and economic growth. In fact, literacy is essential to success in achieving every one of the United Nations 17 Sustainable Goals: NO POVERTY, ZERO HUNGER, GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, QUALITY EDUCATION, GENDER EQUALITY CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION, AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY, DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE, REDUCED INEQUALITIES, SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES, CLIMATE ACTION, LIFE BELOW WATER, LIFE ON LAND, PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS, and PARTNERSHIP FOR THE GOALS.
    [Show full text]