Liberia Demographic and Health Survey 1986 [FR22]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Liberia Demographic and Health Survey 1986 [FR22] Liberia Demographic and Health Survey 1986 Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs ®DHS Demographic and Health Surveys Institute for Resource Development/Westinghouse REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA LIBERIA DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY 1986 by Dorothy Chieh-Johnson Anne R. Cross Ann A. Way Jeremiah M. Sullivan Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs Monrovia, Liberia and Institute .for Resource Development/Westinghouse Columbia, Maryland, U.S.A. February 1988 This report presents the findings of the Liberia Demographic and Health Survey, implemented by the Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs in 1986. The survey is part of the worldwide Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Programme which is designed to collect data on fertility, family planning, and maternal and child health. Additional information on this survey can be ob- tained from the Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs, P.O. Box 9016, Monrovia, Liberia. The Liberia Demographic and Health Survey was carried out with the assistance of the In- stitute for Resource Development (IRD), a subsidiary of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, with offices in Columbia, Maryland. Funding for the survey was provided under a contract with the U.S. Agency for International Development (Contract No. DPE--3023-C~30-4083-00). Addition- al information about the DHS program can be obtained by writing to: DHS, IRD/Westinghouse, P.O. Box 866, Columbia, MD, 21044, U.S.A. (Telex 87775). CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ......................................................................... iii TABLES ............................................................................. v FIGURES ............................................................................ ix PREFACE ........................................................................... xi MAP OF LIBERIA ................................................................... xiv SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 History ....................................................................... 3 1.2 Geography and Climate .......................................................... 4 1.3 Economy ..................................................................... 4 1.4 Educational System ............................................................. 5 1.5 Religion ..................................................................... 5 1.6 Population .................................................................... 6 1.7 Population and Family Planning Policies and Programs ................................ 7 1.8 Health Priorities and Programs .................................................... 7 1.9 Objectives of the Survey ......................................................... 8 1.10 Organization of the Survey ....................................................... 8 1.11 Background Characteristics of the Surveyed Women ................................... 9 2. MARRIAGE AND EXPOSURE TO THE RISK OF PREGNANCY 2.1 Current Marital Status ........................................................... 15 2.2 Polygyny ..................................................................... 16 2.3 Age at First Union .............................................................. 18 2.4 Exposure to the Risk of Pregnancy ................................................. 20 2.5 Breastfeeding, Postpartum Amenorrhea and Abstinence ................................ 23 3. FERTILITY 3.1 Fertility Data .................................................................. 29 3.2 Levels and Differentials in Fertility ................................................. 29 3.3 Fertility Trends ................................................................. 31 3.4 Children Ever Born ............................................................. 32 3.5 Age at First Birth ............................................................... 34 iii Page 4. CONTRACEPTIVE KNOWLEDGE AND USE 4.1 Contraceptive Knowledge ........................................................ 37 4.2 EverUse of Contraception ........................................................ 39 4.3 Current Use of Contraception ..................................................... 40 4.4 Source for Methods ............................................................. 43 4.5 Attitude about Pregnancy and Reasons for Non-use ................................... 46 4.6 Intention To Use In the Future ..................................................... 48 4.7 Approval of the Use of Family Planning Methods ..................................... 49 5. FERTILITY PREFERENCES 5.1 Introduction ................................................................... 53 5.2 Future Fertility Preferences ....................................................... 53 5.3 Ideal Number of Children ........................................................ 59 5.4 Unwanted Fertility .............................................................. 60 6. MORTALITY AND HEALTH 6.1 Mortality ..................................................................... 63 6.2 Maternity Care ................................................................. 70 6.3 Child Health Indicators .......................................................... 71 APPENDIX A: SURVEY DESIGN ..................................................... 83 Sample Design and Implementation ................................................... 83 Characteristics of the Sample ........................................................ 85 APPENDIX B: ESTIMATES OF SAMPLING ERROR ..................................... 87 APPENDIX C: SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES ........................................... 95 REFERENCES ...................................................................... 117 iv TABLES Page 1.1 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF WOMEN AGED 15--49 BY BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS, LIBERIA, 1974, 1984, AND 1986 ............................... 10 1.2 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF WOMEN BY EDUCATION, ACCORDING TO BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS, LIBERIA 1986 ............................... 12 2.1 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF WOMEN BY CURRENT MARITAL STATUS, ACCORDING TO CURRENT AGE, LIBERIA 1986 ................................... 15 2.2 PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WHO HAVE NEVER MARRIED BY AGE GROUP, LIBERIA, 1974, 1984, AND 1986 ........................................................... 16 2.3 PERCENTAGE OF CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN WHO ARE IN A POLYGYNOUS UNION, BY AGE, ACCORDING TO BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS, LIBERIA 1986 .................................................................. 17 2.4 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF WOMEN BY AGE AT FIRST UNION AND MEDIAN AGE AT FIRST UNION, ACCORDING TO CURRENT AGE, LIBERIA 1986 ................... 19 2.5 MEDIAN AGE AT FIRST UNION AMONG WOMEN AGED 20-49 BY CURRENT AGE, ACCORDING TO BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS, LIBERIA 1986 ................ 21 2.6 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN BY EXPOSURE STATUS, ACCORDING TO AGE, LIBERIA 1986 ..................................... 22 2.7 PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WHO ARE CURRENTLY EXPOSED TO THE RISK OF PREGNANCY, BY MARITAL STATUS, ACCORDING TO AGE, LIBERIA 1986 ........... 23 2.8 PROPORTIONS OF WOMEN STILL BREASTFEEDING, POSTPARTUM AMENORRHEIC, AND ABSTAINING, BY MONTHS SINCE BIRTH, AND MEDIAN AND MEAN DURATIONS OF BREASTI~tzEDING, AMENORRHEA AND ABSTINENCE, LIBERIA, 1986 .......................................................................... 24 2.9 MEAN DURATION OF POSTPARTUM BREASTI~EEDING, AMENORRI-IEA, AND SEXUAL ABSTINENCE (CURRENT STATUS ESTIMATE BASED ON BIRTHS WITHIN 36 MONTHS OF THE INTERVIEW DATE), ACCORDING TO BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTHER, LIBERIA, 1986 .................................. 26 3.1 TOTAL FERTILITY RATES FOR 198346, 1980-82, AND THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE SURVEY AND MEAN NUMBER OF CHILDREN EVER BORN TO WOMEN 40-49, ACCORDING TO BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS, LIBERIA, 1986 ................................................................. 30 3.2 AGE-SPECIFIC FERTILITY RATES (PER THOUSAND WOMEN) FOR FIVE-YEAR PERIODS PRIOR TO THE SURVEY, LIBERIA, 1986 ................................. 32 3.3 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF ALL WOMEN AND CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN BY NUMBER OF CHILDREN EVER BORN, ACCORDING TO AGE, LIBERIA, 1986 ......... 33 V Page 3,4 MEAN NUMBER OF CHILDREN EVER BORN TO EVER-MARRIED WOMEN AGED 15--49, ACCORDING TO AGE AT FIRST MARRIAGE AND YEARS SINCE FIRST MARRIAGE, LIBERIA, 1986 ..................................................... 34 3.5 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF ALL WOMEN BY AGE AT FIRST BIRTH, ACCORDING TO CURRENT AGE, LIBERIA, 1986............................................... 35 3.6 MEDIAN AGE AT FIRST BIRTH AMONG WOMEN AGED 20-49, ACCORDING TO CURRENT AGE AND BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMEN, LIBERIA, 1986 .......................................................................... 36 4.1 PERCENTAGE KNOWING ANY CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD AND KNOWING A SOURCE (FOR INFORMATION OR SERVICES) FOR A METHOD AMONG ALL WOMEN AND CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN BY METHOD, LIBERIA, 1986 ................. 38 4.2 PERCENTAGE KNOWING ANY MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD AND PERCENTAGE KNOWING A SOURCE FOR MODERN METHODS AMONG CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN ACCORDING TO BACKGROUND CHARAC'I~RISTICS, LIBERIA, 1986 .......................................................................... 39 4.3 PERCENTAGE WHO HAVE EVER USED CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS AMONG ALL WOMEN AND CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN BY METHOD, LIBERIA, 1986 ....... 40 4.4 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF ALL WOMEN AND WOMEN WHO HAVE EVER USED PERIODIC ABSTINENCE BY KNOWLEDGE
Recommended publications
  • Nimba's Profile
    Nimba’s Profile The Flag of Nimba County: - (Valor, Purity and Fidelity reflected in the stripes) Nimba was part of the central province of Liberia which included Bong and Lofa. It became a full-fledged county in 1964 when President William V.S. Tubman changed the provinces into counties. Nimba became one of the original nine counties of Liberia. Over the years, other sub-divisions have been added making the total of 15 counties. Nimba is located in the North-East Region of the country. The size of Nimba is 4,650 square miles. In his book, Liberia Facing Mount Nimba, Dr. Nya Kwiawon Taryor, Sr. revealed that the name of the county "Nimba", originated from "Nenbaa ton" which means slippery mountain where beautiful young girls slip and fall. Mount Nimba is the highest mountain in Liberia. Nimba is the second largest county in Liberia in terms of population. Before the civil war in 1989, there were over 313,050 people in the county according to the 1984 census. Now Nimba Population has increased to 462,026. Nimba is also one of the richest in Liberia. It has the largest deposit of high grade iron ore. Other natural resources found in Nimba are gold, diamonds, timber, etc. In the late 50's, Nimba's huge iron ore reserve was exploited by LAMCO-the Liberian-American Swedish Mining Company. A considerable portion of Liberia's Gross Domestic Product, GDP, was said to have been generated from revenues from Nimba's iron ore for several years. The Flag of Nimba County: - (Valor, Purity and Fidelity reflected in the stripes) There are negotiations going on for a new contract for the iron ore in Nimba.
    [Show full text]
  • TRC of Liberia Final Report Volum Ii
    REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME II: CONSOLIDATED FINAL REPORT This volume constitutes the final and complete report of the TRC of Liberia containing findings, determinations and recommendations to the government and people of Liberia Volume II: Consolidated Final Report Table of Contents List of Abbreviations <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<............. i Acknowledgements <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<... iii Final Statement from the Commission <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<............... v Quotations <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 1 1.0 Executive Summary <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 2 1.1 Mandate of the TRC <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 2 1.2 Background of the Founding of Liberia <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<... 3 1.3 History of the Conflict <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<................ 4 1.4 Findings and Determinations <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 6 1.5 Recommendations <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<... 12 1.5.1 To the People of Liberia <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 12 1.5.2 To the Government of Liberia <<<<<<<<<<. <<<<<<. 12 1.5.3 To the International Community <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 13 2.0 Introduction <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 14 2.1 The Beginning <<................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Profile of Commissioners of the TRC of Liberia <<<<<<<<<<<<.. 14 2.3 Profile of International Technical Advisory Committee <<<<<<<<<. 18 2.4 Secretariat and Specialized Staff <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 20 2.5 Commissioners, Specialists, Senior Staff, and Administration <<<<<<.. 21 2.5.1 Commissioners <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<. 22 2.5.2 International Technical Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Where Have All the (Qualified) Teachers Gone?
    African Educational Research Journal Vol. 6(2), pp. 30-47, April 2018 DOI: 10.30918/AERJ.62.18.013 ISSN: 2354-2160 Full Length Research Paper Where have all the (qualified) teachers gone? Implications for measuring sustainable development goal target 4.c from a study of teacher supply, demand and deployment in Liberia Mark Ginsburg*, Noor Ansari, Oscar N. Goyee, Rachel Hatch, Emmanuel Morris and Delwlebo Tuowal 1University of Maryland, USA. 2Universidad de Ciencias Pedagógicas Enrique José Varona, Cuba. Accepted 3 April, 2018 ABSTRACT This paper analyzes data collected in the 2013 Liberian Annual School Census undertaken as part of the Educational Management Information System and supplemented by information gathered from teacher education program organizers as well as from samples of graduates from preservice and inservice C- Certificate granting programs undertaken in Liberia in during 2007 to 2013. The authors report that the percentage of “qualified” primary school teachers (that is, those with at least a C-Certificate, which Liberian policy sets as the minimum qualification) expanded dramatically after the education system was decimated during the years of civil war (1989 to 2003). We also indicate that in government primary schools in 2013, the pupil-teacher ratio (24.8) and even the pupil-qualified teacher ratio (36.2) was lower – that is, better – than the policy goal of 44 pupils per teacher. However, teacher hiring and deployment decisions led to large inequalities in these input measures of educational quality. At the same time, the authors discovered that the findings from the analysis of Liberia’s 2013 EMIS data did not fully answer the question of where the (qualified) teachers are, in that we were not able to locate in the EMIS database substantial numbers of graduates of the various C-Certificate teacher education programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Evaluation of Project
    Independent Evaluation of Project “Support to National Peacebuilding Priorities in Enhancing the Capacity of Human Rights Institutions and Entities in Liberia” (Funded by Peacebuilding Fund/Peacebuilding Support Office) Final Evaluation Report An external Consultant has prepared this report. The views expressed herein therefore do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of OHCHR. December 2019 Yagya Bikram Shahi i Evaluation Team Mr. Yagya Bikram Shahi is the chairperson of a development consulting firm - Devsuits in Nepal and is an international consultant who has been involved in managing human rights projects supported by several development partners, such as the governments or aid agencies of Australia, Denmark, EU, Finland, Germany, Norway, Switzerland, the UK and the USA for more than 10 years. He has also worked with UNDP, UNFPA, UN Women and OHCHR for seven years and managed two OHCHR projects funded by Peacebuilding Fund in Nepal and in Uganda. Mr. Shahi oversaw the evaluation of more than 50 projects on human rights, transitional justice and peacebuilding; and evaluated more than a dozen projects on human rights, peacebuilding, community mediation, etc. in Nepal, Liberia and South Sudan. He is trained on project cycle management from MDF, the Netherlands. Mr. Shahi led the final evaluation of the project. Ms. Martin Wiles Mardea, Monitoring and Evaluation Officer and Mr. Daniel Melvin Nyanway, Human Rights Officer from OHCHR Liberia provided necessary substantive information and documents on the project implementation and facilitated the interactions with key project stakeholders, beneficiaries and arranged field visits. Evaluation Managers Dr. Uchenna Emelonye, Country Representative, OHCHR Liberia Mr. Sonny Onyegbula, Human Rights Officer, OHCHR Liberia Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Empowering Youth, Opening up Perspectives - Employment Promotion As a Contribution to Peace Consolidation in South-East Liberia
    SLE Publication Series – S… SLE Publication Series – S251 Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung (SLE) – Centre for Rural Development Study commissioned by Welthungerhilfe in collaboration with the German Financial Cooperation-funded Reintegration and Recovery Program (RRP) and its partners IBIS and medica mondiale Liberia Empowering Youth, Opening up Perspectives - Employment Promotion as a Contribution to Peace Consolidation in South-East Liberia Dr. Ekkehard Kürschner (Teamleader), Joscha Albert, Emil Gevorgyan, Eva Jünemann, Elisabetta Mina, Jonathan Julius Ziebula Monrovia / Berlin, December 2012 Foreword i Foreword SLE Publication Series S251 For 50 years, the Centre for Rural Development (SLE - Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, trains young professionals for the field of German and international development cooperation. Editor Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Three-month practical projects conducted on behalf of German and international Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung (SLE) organisations in development cooperation form an integral part of the one-year Hessische Straße 1-2 postgraduate course. In interdisciplinary teams and under the guidance of an 10115 Berlin experienced team leader, young professionals carry out assignments on innovative Tel.: 0049-30-2093 6900 future-oriented topics, providing consultant support to the commissioning FAX: 0049-30-2093 6904 organisations. Involving a diverse range of actors in the process is of great [email protected] importance here, i.e. surveys from household level to decision makers and experts at www.sle-berlin.de national level. The outputs of this “applied research” directly contribute to solving specific development problems. Editorial Dr. Karin Fiege, SLE The studies are mostly linked to rural development (incl. management of natural resources, climate change, food security or agriculture), the cooperation with fragile or least developed countries (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final report October 2019-March 2020 Grand Bassa, Grand Cape Mount, Rural Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe Counties 2 ACKNOWLEGEMENTS The Link NCA in Grand Bassa, Grand Cape Mount, Rural Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe Counties was commissioned by the Liberian Wash Consortium and funded by Irish Aid. The study was conducted by Link NCA Analyst, Grace Heymsfield, under the supervision of Lenka Blanárová, Senior Nutrition Assessment Coordinator, Action Against Hunger UK, and the study’s focal points: Tom Health (Action Against Hunger France WASH Technical Adviser) and Michael Slewion Doe (Consortium Coordinator), with valuable contributions from the pool of Technical Advisors at Action Against Hunger, France, namely Fabienne Rousseau, Xuan Phan and Janis Differt; Tekar Jallah-Bundor, Action Against Hunger Liberia Nutrition and Health Program Manager, and Mohamed Takoy, Action Against Hunger Liberia Country Representative. The Link NCA team wishes to express their thanks to all those who have contributed to this study and/or facilitated its development, in particular the qualitative and quantitative study teams for their expertise and sense of humor.1 A special thank you to: • G. Tarnue Brooks, Action Against Hunger M&E Officer, for his constant encouragement and immense support co-managing the Risk Factor Survey; • Two additional team members who ‘Linked’ both stages of the study, propelling the study forward with their qualitative and quantitative experience: Paul Sahr Johnson & Joseph N. Davis- Qualitative Research Assistants, Quantitative Supervisors; To Dr. Annette Brima- Davis, Director, Nutrition Division, and Mameni Linga Morli, National SUN Focal Point, for their support of the study, as well as the Grand Cape Mount, Grand Bassa, Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe County Health Teams, for their tireless efforts and partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • View First Project Report
    ACRONYMS AIFO Associazione Italiana Amici di Raoul Follereau ALM American Leprosy Missions CHOs County Health Officers CHT County Health Team CBR Community Based Rehabilitation CCCs Community Care Centers DHOs District Health Officers EPHS Essential Package of Health Services ETUs Ebola Treatment Units EVD Ebola Virus Disease GLRA German Leprosy Relief Association GCHVs General Community Health Volunteers IGAs Income Generating Activities LFPs Leprosy Focal Persons LDHS Liberia Demographic Health Survey MoH Ministry of Health MAP Medical Assistance Program NLTCP National Leprosy and Tuberculosis Control Programme NCD National Commission on Disabilities OICs Officer in Charge PHCs Primary Health Care Staff SHGs Self Help Groups 2 WHO World Health Organization 1. PROJECT TITLE AND GENERAL INFOS Project Title: “Support for the Strategic Plan for the Fight against Leprosy in South EastLiberia” Location: Liberia (West Africa). In 5 Counties: Nimba, Grand Gedeh, River Gee, Grand Kru and Maryland. Dioceses: Diocese of Gbarnga (County of Bong) and of Cape Palmas (County of Maryland). Local partner: Congregation of the Missionary Sisters of the Consolata in Liberia. Other partners: Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW), and National Commission on Disabilities (NCD) Sectors: Health, socio - economic and education. Duration: 3 Years Start date: 1st October, 2014 Overall objective: To contribute to strengthening the national health system in the five counties of the south-east (Grand Gedeh, Sinoe, River Gee, Grand Kru and Maryland) as provided by the "Strategic Plan on Leprosy 2013-2017" of the Ministry of Health. Specific objectives: 1) Increase the quantity, quality and access to services for the identification and treatment of leprosy provided by primary health centers in the communities involved in the project through specific training of medical and paramedical staff.
    [Show full text]
  • FGM in Liberia: Sande (2014)
    7 0 Registered Charity: No. 1150379 Limited Company: No: 08122211 E-mail: [email protected] © 28 Too Many 2019 Second Edition Efua Dorkenoo OBE 1949–2014 28 Too Many dedicates this report to Efua Dorkenoo. A courageous and inspirational campaigner, Efua worked tirelessly for women’s and girls’ rights and to create an African-led global movement to end Female Genital Mutilation. 2 Contents Foreword to the 2014 Edition .................................................... 5 Case Study: Blessing ................................................................... 6 Foreword to the 2019 Edition .................................................... 7 Information on Country Profiles ................................................ 8 Background ............................................................................................................................... 8 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Use of This Country Profile ....................................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 9 The Team .................................................................................................................................. 9 List of Abbreviations ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Issues Emanating from Traditional Practices in Liberia
    UNMIL UNITED NATIONS MISSION IN LIBERIA An Assessment of Human Rights Issues Emanating from Traditional Practices in Liberia Table of Contents 1. Executive summary .................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 3. Methodology and constraints .................................................................................... 3 4. Overview of traditional and cultural societies and practices in Liberia ............... 4 5. Legal and policy framework related to traditional and cultural practices .......... 6 5.1. International and regional human rights framework ................................................. 6 5.2. Domestic legal and policy framework for the protection of human rights in the context of cultural practices ................................................................................................... 10 5.3. Challenges in the legal and normative framework .................................................... 13 5.3.1. The Hinterland Regulations ..................................................................................... 13 5.3.2. “Positive Culture” in Liberian law .......................................................................... 14 5.3.3. Perceptions of human rights among traditional actors and communities ................ 15 6. Human rights abuses emanating from cultural and traditional practices ......... 15 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Comprehensive Prevention Strategy
    COMPREHENSIVE SEXUAL AND GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE PREVENTION STRATEGY FOR LIBERIA NOVEMBER 2019 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUctiON 2 1.1 The Spotlight Initiative and the Comprehensive Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Prevention Strategy 2 2. Background to sexual and gender-Based VIOLENCE IN LIBERIA 3 3. METHODOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE SEXUAL AND gender-Based Violence strategy 7 3.1 Primary and secondary data collection 7 3.2 Limitations 8 4. SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS FROM PRIMARY DATA COLLEctiON 9 5. NATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE PREVENTION OF sexual and gender-Based Violence 17 5.1 Principles and approaches 17 5.2 Vision 18 5.3 Implementation plan and communication strategy 18 5.4 Lessons learned and best practices for community interventions 19 5.5 The socioecological framework as framework for the Strategy 20 6. OBJEctiVE OF THE StRATEGY: ‘SOCIAL NORMS, STRUctURES AND PRActicE ARE IN PLACE TO PREVENT SGBV AND HP AND FACILITATE AccESS TO SRHRS’ 23 7. Recommendations to facilitate implementation OF THE StRATEGY 24 8. THE ActORS IMPLEMENTING THE StRATEGY 25 10. REFERENCES 28 11. APPENDICES 30 Appendix 1: Key questions 30 Appendix 2: Organizations and institutions met 32 Appendix 3: Implementation Plan of the Prevention Strategy 33 Appendix 4: Liberia Comprehensive Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Prevention Strategy: Monitoring and evaluation framework 39 ON DUCTI ro T N Acronyms and abbreviations 1. I 1. CSO CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION DV DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FGD FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION FGM FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Chronic Food Insecurity in Liberia
    Assessment of Chronic Food Insecurity in Liberia Analysis Coordination Analysis Partners Liberia Agribusiness Development Activity (LADA) June 2017 This publication was prepared under the United States Agency for International Development Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Indefinite Quantity Contract, AID-OAA-I-12-00006. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Assessment of Chronic Food Insecurity in Liberia June 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Summary of Classification Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 3 Food Consumption Quality ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Food Consumption Quantity ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Nutrition .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Infrastructure and Inclusive Growth the AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP
    Liberia Infrastructure and Inclusive Growth THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP This report has been prepared by the African Development Bank (AfDB) Group. Designations employed in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the institution concerning the legal status of any country, or the limitation of its frontier. While efforts have been made to present reliable information, the AfDB accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences of its use. Vice President: Zondo Sakala Regional Director: Franck Perrault Chief Country Economist (at the time): Stefan Muller Senior Country Economist: Patrick Hettinger Resident Representative: Margaret Kilo Consultants: Andy Dijkerman, Emmanuel Akpa Copyright 2013 - AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP Photo Credits: AfDB photo files, Graham Prentice, United Nations Liberia Office, Map of Liberia courtesy of Nations Online Project. PUBLISHED BY Temporary Relocation Agency (TRA) B.P. 323-1002 Tunis Belvedere, Tunisia Tel: (216) 7110-2876 Fax: (216) 7110-3779 Website: www.afdb.org Foreword he African Development Bank views poor and the related infrastructure investment priorities that infrastructure as a critical barrier to reducing can best bring Liberia out of its relative isolation. These T poverty and accelerating growth on the continent. will enable Liberia to play a larger role on an agricultural Concurrently, African leaders increasingly realize the trading stage within the Mano River Union, on a regional advantages of regional cooperation and countries are stage within the ECOWAS energy, communications and placing greater emphasis on accelerating integration transit trade markets and on a globally competitive stage through policies and infrastructure. However, countries as an attractive investment destination for manufacturing, recovering from prolonged periods of conflict or troubled mining and agro-industry.
    [Show full text]