Influence of Climatic Factors on The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Influence of Climatic Factors on The FORESTRY IDEAS, 2021, vol. 27, No 1 (61): 29–45 INFLUENCE OF CLIMATIC FACTORS ON THE FORMATION OF SCOTS PINE (PINUS SYLVESTRIS L.) AND NORWAY SPRUCE (PICEA ABIES KARST.) RADIAL GROWTH ELEMENTS IN THE BOREAL ZONE OF RUSSIA Dmitry A. Danilov1* and Dmitry A. Zaytsev2 1Institute of Forests and Natural Resources, Saint-Petersburg State Forest Technical University, 5 Institutsky lane, Saint-Petersburg, 194021, Russian Federation. Leningrad Research Agriculture Institute Branch of Russian Potato Research Centre, 1 Institutskaya Str., Gatchinsky District, Leningrad Oblast, 188338, Russian Federation. E-mails: [email protected]*; [email protected] Received: 25 December 2020 Accepted: 28 February 2021 Abstract We studied the influence of average temperatures and precipitation of the growing season on the formation of macrostructural elements of radial growth in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands of Leningrad region located in the boreal zone of the European part of Russia. Denro- climatic studies were carried out using the results of wood samples analysis from forest stands on two-layer soils collected during 60 years. The digitized parameters of wood samples were processed in a GIS system, which made it possible to obtain an array of generalized dendrochro- nologies. A rank correlation analysis of the data obtained was carried out using the Spearman’s test. To simulate the combined effect of the amount of precipitation and average temperatures on the formation of the structural elements of radial growth, the method of the quadratic function was used. Depending on the composition of a stand, there was a different response to the se- lected meteorological factors during the study period. In pine stands, the effect of the average temperature of the growing season on the amount of annual radial growth was greater than in spruce stands. In spruce and pine stands with the participation of deciduous species, the struc- tural elements of wood were more meteosensitive. The use of the quadratic function method made it possible to assess the combined effect of the total precipitation and average temperature of the growing season on the elements of radial growth of pine and spruce in the stands under study over the period of the experiment. Stands with various proportions of pine predominantly responded in the same way to changes in external factors associated with the climatic features of the region, which indicates the priority of their use in dendrochronological studies. Key words: amount of precipitation, annual ring width, average temperature, early and late wood, statistical analysis. Introduction formation about changes in the action of environmental factors (Byusgen 1906, A great number of researchers noted the Mikola 1962, Vikhrov and Protasevich ability of annual growth rings to retain in- 1965, Dergachev and Chistyakov 1993, 30 D. Danilov and D. Zaytsev Makinen et al. 2002, Grippa and Potakhin vital state of a stand, etc. For this reason, 2016). The obtained information, on one the revealed correlations between the cur- hand, is chronological, that is, it repre- rent radial growth and meteorological fac- sents the variability of annual growth in tors are, in fact, statistical, reflecting their time, the presence of temporary cyclical influence on the intensity of the use of wa- changes, and the direction of changes ter-mineral soil resources in accordance (Mielikäinen et al. 1996). On the other with the vital state of the stand. hand, this information is associated with It has been noted that the growth rate exogenous and endogenous environmen- of annual rings of Scots pine and Norway tal factors (Eckstein et al. 1989). spruce of the same age growing in the Radial growth of stem wood of for- Baltic region in different habitat conditions est-forming woody plants is a complex in- was not the same against the background tegral indicator, to the formation of which of changes in weather factors (Bitvinskas the genotype of each particular plant and 1974, 1984). a complex of environmental factors con- Variability in radial growth of conifer- tribute. Radial growth of trees is a bioin- ous trees in Central and Eastern Europe dicator, and the characteristics of tree and in Northern Fennoscandia was main- growth rings can show changes in the en- ly associated with changes in the sum of vironment (Babushkina et al. 2010). positive temperatures of the growing sea- A large number of publications have son (Mikola 1962; Makinen et al. 2000, been devoted to the variability of tree 2001, 2002, 2003). In contrast, in Central growth, but many issues remain debat- Europe variation in growth of conifers was able or poorly understood, due to the di- mainly correlated with precipitation (Eck- versity of both forest biogeocoenoses and stein et al. 1989, Kahle 1994, Kahle and the nature of environmental impacts, as Spiecker 1996). Studies of precipitation well as the differences in research meth- effect on annual radial growth of Norway ods (Henttonen 1990, Demakov 2005, Va- spruce carried out in southern and central ganov et al. 2006, Zaytsev et al. 2020). Finland have also revealed that damage Climatic factors have a particularly and dying off of spruce in drought-sen- strong effect on the growth rate. By de- sitive areas in the southern part of the viating from the long-term average they country could be primarily related to low produce response in plants (Mitryajkina precipitation rather than temperature fluc- 2005). tuations (Mikola 1962; Henttonen 1990; Since a complex of factors affects Mielikäinen et al. 1996; Miina 2000; Maki- growth and development of plants during nen et al. 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003). their life cycle, the relationship between Makinen et al. (2002, 2003) stud- the width of annual growth rings and cli- ied changes in radial growth of Norway matic parameters is not always unambig- spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and its uous. dependence on various climatic vari- Meteorological values such as air tem- ables. The researchers compared for- perature and precipitation directly influ- est stands in southwestern and eastern ence the development of dendrocoenoses Germany, Norway and Finland. Climate (Miina 2000). However, the growth of the models included local temperature and trunk mass of trees also depends on soil precipitation, and temperature anomalies. nutrients, moisture, depth of groundwater, Trees growing in moderate conditions Influence of Climatic Factors on the Formation of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ... 31 have been found to be less responsive Material and Methods to climate change. Changes in spruce growth were clearly correlated with tem- To correctly identify the consequences of perature. the influence of meteorological parame- When the Baltic countries were consid- ters on tree growth, only forest stands on ered, on moist soil growth of Scots pine similar soils and in similar hydrological was more sensitive to precipitation of the conditions should be considered. The se- previous year (Daukane and Elferts 2011). lection of sampling points is a key issue Studies of interannual differences in dendroclimatic research. It determines in growth of Scots pine tree rings at the sensitivity of trees under study to various northern border of the range under the environmental factors. conditions of the European North have To study the influence of meteorologi- revealed consistency in long-term growth cal factors on annual growth of Scots pine and the same response to changes in and Norway spruce, studies were carried environmental conditions (Tyukavina and out in pure and mixed coniferous stands of Lezhneva 2014, Tyukavina 2015). In dif- the same age class (85–100 years) of the ferent growing conditions, pine reacted to bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) series of unfavourable factors more synchronously forest types in the conditions of Oredezh than to optimal ones. plateau of Luga-Oredezhsky landscape According to a number of authors, in region of Leningrad region located in the the taiga geocomplexes of the Europe- Northwest of the European part of Russia. an North of Russia, the amount of radial Geographic coordinates of study area are growth of wood is limited by the ratio of 59°16’58” N and 30°14’24’’ E. heat and moisture, both in the atmos- The natural stands under study have phere and in the soil, especially during not been affected by human activities and the growing season (Grippa and Potakhin grow on soils with two-layer structure. The 2016, Chudakov et al. 2020). landscape types under consideration are The analysis of wood samples collect- widespread in the boreal zone of Valdai ed from large territories by scientists from glaciation area: within the moraine plain different countries made it possible to and along the tops and slopes of north-fac- consider tree growth as an indicator of the ing moraine hills. Two-layer sediments are dynamics of biological systems in space rocks of a loamy or sandy composition of and time in connection with changes in low thickness (30–70 cm) occurring on natural conditions and anthropogenic in- loams, which serve as the first imperme- fluences at the local, regional and global able horizon from the surface. The main scales (Martínez-Sancho et al. 2020). distinguishing feature of the hydrolog- In connection with the above, it is nec- ical regime of drained soils on two-layer essary for forestry practice to determine sediments is the presence of a surface stands with less dependence on variations soil-groundwater horizon in April-May and of limiting meteorological factors. The aim September-November which screens the of the study was to analyse the influence loam located below (Chertov 1981). of meteorological parameters on the for- The climate of the area is Atlantic-con- mation of annual growth and its structur- tinental, with relatively mild winters with al elements in Norway spruce and Scots thaws and moderately warm summers. pine stands of various compositions. The prevailing winds are westerly and 32 D.
Recommended publications
  • St Petersburg City & Leningrad Orphanage Addresses
    St Petersburg & Leningrad Oblast orphanages from Yell.Ru – already translated, in Russian starts page 7 http://www.yell.ru/spbeng/index.php?company&p=1&ri=1925 ALMUS, Orphanage, Social & Rehabilitation Centre Tel. 568-33-52 192174, Ul. Shelgunova, 25 Fax 568-33-52 Map BLAGODAT, Children's Home № 41 Tel. 370-08-01 196191, Novoizmaylovskiy Prospekt, 40, build 3 Map CHILDREN'S ARK, Social Orphanage Tel. 700-55-56 192177, Pribrezhnaya Ul., 10, build 1 Fax 700-55-56 Map Children's Home Tel. 750-10-04 198260, Prospekt Narodnogo Opolcheniya, 155 Map Children's Home & School № 27 Tel. 461-45-80 196650, Kolpino, Ul. , 6 Map Children's Home & School № 46, English Tel. 430-32-51 197183, Ul. Savushkina, 61 Map Children's Home & School № 9 Tel. 772-46-53 192286, Bukharestskaya Ul., 63 Fax 772-58-47 Map Children's Home № 1 Tel. 377-36-61 198216, Schastlivaya Ul., 6 Fax 377-36-61 Map Children's Home № 1, Kingisepp Tel. (81375)273- 188485, Leningrad Region, Kingisepp, APTEKARSKIJ Pereulok, 14 90 Fax (81375)277-25 Children's Home № 10 Tel. 252-49-94 198095, Ul. Ivana Chernykh, 11-а Map Children's Home № 11 Tel. 360-02-71 192071, Bukharestskaya Ul., 37, build 2 Fax 360-02-71 Map Children's Home № 14 Tel. 232-58-06 197198, Syeszhinskaya Ul., 26/28 Map Children's Home № 19 Tel. 524-51-44 195298, derevnya Zanevka Children's Home № 2 for Retarded Children (Age 4-18) Tel. 450-52-70 198504, Stary Petergoff, Petergofskaya Ul., 4/2 Children's Home № 20 Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St
    List of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region № Units Addresses п\п 1 Admiralteysky District of Saint 190013, Saint Petersburg Vereyskaya Street, 39 Petersburg 2 Vasileostrovsky District of Saint 199106, Saint Petersburg, Vasilyevsky Island, 19th Line, 12a Petersburg 3 Vyborgsky District of Saint 194156, Saint Petersburg, Prospekt Parkhomenko, 18 Petersburg 4 Kalininsky District of Saint 195297, Saint Petersburg, Bryantseva Street, 15 Petersburg 5 Kirovsky District of Saint 198152, Saint Petersburg, Avtovskaya Street, 22 Petersburg 6 Kolpinsky District of Saint 198152, Saint Petersburg, Kolpino, Pavlovskaya Street, 1 Petersburg 7 Krasnogvardeisky District of 195027, Saint Petersburg, Bolsheokhtinsky Prospekt, 11/1 Saint Petersburg 8 Krasnoselsky District of Saint 198329, Saint Petersburg, Tambasova Street, 4 Petersburg 9 Kurortny District of Saint 197706, Saint Petersburg, Sestroretsk, Primorskoe Highway, Petersburg 280 10 Kronshtadtsky District of Saint 197760, Saint Petersburg, Kronstadt, Lenina Prospekt, 20 Petersburg 11 Moskovsky District of Saint 196135, Saint Petersburg, Tipanova Street, 3 Petersburg 12 Nevsky District of Saint 192171, Saint Petersburg, Sedova Street, 86 Petersburg 13 Petrogradsky District of Saint 197022, Saint Petersburg, Grota Street, 1/3 Petersburg 14 Petrodvortsovy District of Saint 198516, Saint Petersburg, Peterhof, Petersburg Konnogrenaderskaya Street., 1 15 Primorsky District of Saint 197374 Saint Petersburg, Yakhtennaya Street, 7/2
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Charitable Activity of the Elena and Gennady Timchenko Foundation Timchenko Elena & Gennady Timchenko Foundation Foundation Contents
    2015 REPORT ON THE CHARITABLE ACTIVITY OF THE ELENA AND GENNADY TIMCHENKO FOUNDATION TIMCHENKO ELENA & GENNADY TIMCHENKO FOUNDATION FOUNDATION CONTENTS Message from Elena and Gennady Timchenko .....................4 Working with the Foundation.............................................109 Message from Xenia Frank .....................................................6 Selecting grant recipients .............................................. 110 Message from Maria Morozova .............................................8 Open grant competitions ............................................... 110 The Foundation’s mission statement and values ................10 Non-competitive support ................................................111 Work programme ..................................................................11 Duration of project support ............................................111 5 years of work – facts and results ...................................... 12 Programme evaluation system ...........................................111 Key results in 2015 .............................................................. 16 Risk management ...............................................................112 Interaction with stakeholders .............................................112 Working with enquiries from the public .........................112 THE OLDER GENERATION PROGRAMME .......................18 Working with regional agents .........................................113 Society for all Ages Focus Area ............................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Package JSSP/ICB/2.3.2. Telecommunication Infrastructure Development in the Area of Departmental Telephone Network, Stage 1
    Judicial System Support Project BIDDING DOCUMENTS # JSSP/ICB/2.3.2 Section VI “Technical Requirements (including Implementation Schedule)” 169 Package JSSP/ICB/2.3.2. Telecommunication Infrastructure Development In the Area of Departmental Telephone Network, Stage 1 Section VI. Technical requirements (including Implementation Schedule) A. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................... 172 A.1. Subject of this Contract ...................................................................................... 172 A.2. Payer ................................................................................................................. 172 A.3. Client ................................................................................................................. 172 A.4. Consignee .......................................................................................................... 172 A.5. Expected results ................................................................................................. 172 A.6. Primary objectives of the Client ......................................................................... 173 A.7. List of acronyms ................................................................................................ 173 B. FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................... 176 B.1. Current Status .................................................................................................... 176 B.2. Main responsibilities
    [Show full text]
  • WCER Problems of Reforming Local Self Governance
    Consortium for Economic Policy Research and Advice WCER Canadian Association Institute Working Academy International of Universities for the Economy Center of National Development and Colleges in Transition for Economic Economy Agency of Canada Reform Problems of Reforming Local Selfgovernance: Structural and Financial Aspects Moscow 2005 УДК 352+336.132.11 ББК 65.050.2+65.261.8 P93 Problems of Reforming Local Selfgovernance: Structural and Financial Aspects. M.: IET, 2005. P. 421. Agency CIP RSL Team leader – I. Starodubrovskaya Authors: Chapters 1, 6–7, Introduction, Conclusion – I. Starodubrovskaya; Chapter 2 – I. Starodubrovskaya, M. Slavgorodskaya, T. Letunova; Chapters 3, 4 – M. Slavgorodskaya; Chapter 5 – I. Starodubrovskaya, M. Slavgorodskaya; Chapter 8 – I. Starodubrovskaya, N. Mironova; Chapter 9 – E. Slack, Consulting Inc., Canada; Chapters 10, 12 – H. Kitchen, Department of Economics, The Trent University, Canada; Chapter 11 – G. Gaboury, F. Vaillancourt, Department of Economics, The University of Montreal, Canada. The paper considers territorial models of local selfgovernance that had emerged in Russian regions prior to the reform and their impact on various aspects of municipal establishments' activities. The authors evaluate the regional law in the area of local selfgovernance and interbudgetary relations and consider issues associated with the rise and emergence of territorial foundations of the institute in question until 2003. The authors also analyze reforms undertaken in RF regions in 2004 that addressed the problem of a new territorial structure of local selfgovernance. Individual chapters highlight on international experiences in the area of organization and financing of local administrations. JEL Classification: H11, H70, H77, K10. Editors: Glavatskaya N., Mezentseva K., Serianova S.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy of RUSSLAVBANK
    Content Address of Chairman of the Board ........................4 General Bank Information .....................................6 Strategy of RUSSLAVBANK .................................16 Activity Results in 2008 ......................................18 Auditor’s Opinion ................................................26 Published Financial Statements ..........................28 ADDRESS OF CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD In 2009 RUSSLAVBANK will mark its 19th year of operations. During this period the Bank has lived through nu- merous and various events — festal and heavy, but by all means useful, contributing to its further growth. All these years the Bank has been developing together with its clients and thanks to them. The current crisis is not the first one in the Bank’s history. Economic difficulties are a sort of moment of truth, when business is testing its stability and survivability. And the Bank is passing through this ordeal with credit, retaining and strengthening the gained position. According to “RBK–Rating” agency RUSSLAVBANK ranked as one of top–100 most profitable banks in 2008. At the traditional world banking forum SIBOS–2008 managers of major financial institutions of the world agreed that in the current economic situation the commission business is a vital component enabling to retain the profitability, stability and steadiness of a full–scale bank. And money transfers and payments are one of the most dynamically developing tools of this business. This statement is confirmed by positive developing dynamics of inter- national cash remittance and payment system CONTACT created by RUSSLAVBANK: the number of service points is expanding, the list of the system’s partners is increasing, the volumes and number of users is growing. The leading international and Russian rating agencies have assigned rather high long–term and short–term deposit ratings and credit ratings to RUSSLAVBANK — А, В3, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Special Offers
    SPECIAL OFFERS 1 How to recharge Как пополнить the transport pass? баланс проездного? Transport pass can be Пополните баланс в recharged at metro cash- кассах или терминалах desks and e-terminals. метрополитена. Using the terminal first В терминале выберите choose “Top up the unified опцию «Пополнить e-purse” option and then единый электронный insert the card. кошелек», затем вставьте карту. терминалы / terminals опции / options турникет / turnstile считыватель / card reader Public Общественный transport транспорт St. Petersburg Card can be Карта Гостя может исполь- used as a travel pass on all зоваться как проездной means of transport after its на всех видах городского balance is topped up. транспорта после попол- нения баланса электрон- ного кошелька. Metro В метро Touch the card on a Для оплаты проезда при- turnstile to pay for a trip. ложите карту к турникету. In buses, trams and Автобусы, трамваи, trolleybuses троллейбусы Touch the card on a card Для оплаты проезда reader to pay for the trip or приложите карту к считы- present it to a conductor. вателю или предъявите кондуктору. St. Petersburg Card Customer service Служба информации Карты Гостя + 7 (812) 604 00 42 [email protected] 4 _ _. _ _. _ _ __:__ _ _. _ _. _ _ __:__ Fill in the date and time of the first visit and expiry. Впишите дату и время начала и окончания срока действия карты. 5 How to use your St. Petersburg Card? 1. St. Petersburg Card is valid for 2 days / 48 hours, 3 days / 72 hours, 5 days / 120 hours or 7 days / 168 hours from the first visit to a museum or a tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Industry in the Leningrad Region
    GUIDE TO INDUSTRY IN THE LENINGRAD REGION LENINGRAD REGION COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY PwC Russia (www.pwc.ru) provides industry-focused assurance, advisory, tax and legal services. Over 2,500 people work in our offices in Mos- cow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Kazan, Novosibirsk, Krasnodar, Voronezh, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk and Vladikavkaz. We share our thinking, ex- perience and solutions to develop fresh perspectives and practical advice to open up new opportunities for business. The global network of PwC firms brings together more than 180,000 people in 158 countries. PwC first came to the Russian market in 1913, and re-established its presence in 1989. Over the past 20 years, PwC has grown to become the larg- est professional services provider in Russia. TABLE OF CONTENTS According to independent research conducted among the largest companies and organisations in Russia over the period 2008-2012, PwC has consistently been the strongest brand among the Big Four over the past five years. This study was conducted anonymously by an independent research organisation to ESOMAR standards. 4 Introduction by the Governor - Defence-industrial complex of the Leningrad Region - Mining - Production and distribution of power, 6 Foreword by the Managing gas and water Partner of PwC Russia - Agricultural sector - Success stories 10 Investment potential • ZAO International Paper of the Leningrad Region • Tikhvin Freight Car - Social and economic situation Building Plant CJSC - Gross regional product (GRP) • OAO Ust-Luga
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Industry in the Leningrad Region
    GUIDE TO INDUSTRY IN THE LENINGRAD REGION LENINGRAD REGION COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY 1X$3VTTJB XXXQXDSV QSPWJEFTJOEVTUSZGPDVTFEBTTVSBODF BEWJTPSZ UBYBOEMFHBMTFSWJDFT0WFS QFPQMFXPSLJOPVSPGΎDFTJO.PT- cow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Kazan, Novosibirsk, Krasnodar, Voronezh, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk and Vladikavkaz. We share our thinking, ex- perience and solutions to develop fresh perspectives and practical advice to open up new opportunities for business. The global network of PwC ΎSNTCSJOHTUPHFUIFSNPSFUIBO QFPQMFJODPVOUSJFT 1X$ΎSTUDBNFUPUIF3VTTJBONBSLFUJO BOESFFTUBCMJTIFEJUTQSFTFODFJO0WFSUIFQBTUZFBST 1X$IBTHSPXOUPCFDPNFUIFMBSH- est professional services provider in Russia. TABLE OF COONNTTEENNTS "DDPSEJOHUPJOEFQFOEFOUSFTFBSDIDPOEVDUFEBNPOHUIFMBSHFTUDPNQBOJFTBOEPSHBOJTBUJPOTJO3VTTJBPWFSUIFQFSJPE 1X$IBT DPOTJTUFOUMZCFFOUIFTUSPOHFTUCSBOEBNPOHUIF#JH'PVSPWFSUIFQBTUΎWFZFBST5IJTTUVEZXBTDPOEVDUFEBOPOZNPVTMZCZBOJOEFQFOEFOU SFTFBSDIPSHBOJTBUJPOUP&40."3TUBOEBSET 4 Innttrooduucctiionn bbyy tthe Goovveernnnoor - Defence-industrial complex of thhhee Lenninnggrraad Reegiionn - Mining - Production and distribution of power, 6 FoForrewwoorrd byy tthhe MMaanaagginngg gas and water PParrtnnneer of PwwCC RRuusssiaa - Agricultural sector - Success stories 100 Innvvesssttmmennt pootteenttiaal ã© ZAO International Paper of thhhee Lenninnggrraad Reegiionn ã© Tikhvin Freight Car - Social and economic situation Building Plant CJSC - Gross regional product (GRP) ã© OAO Ust-Luga Company - Investment climate ã© Galactika Group of Companies
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Guide
    Putevoditel-Eng_Layout 1 28.01.2015 15:17 Page 1 2 26 - Governor of the Leningrad Region - PwC Russia’s Managing Partner - Economic Development Agency of Leningrad - Chairman of the Leningrad Region Legislative Region: «one-stop-shop» investor support Assembly - Agency for Strategic Initiatives to Promote - Ombudsperson for Entrepreneurs' Rights New Projects in the Leningrad Region 28 10 - General statistics and performance - Manufacturing - Statistics - Mining - Ratings - Power, gas and water production - Cluster policy and distribution - Competitive advantages - Investment strategy 32 - State support - Medical, Pharmaceutical and Radiation Tech- - Investment law nology Cluster - Investment sites. Integrated regional - Shipbuilding Cluster information system - Construction Materials Cluster - Industrial parks - Agricultural Cluster - Public private partnerships - Automotive and Auto Components Cluster - Organisations and associations - Forestry Cluster - Oil&Gas, Chemical and Petrochemical Cluster - Military Industrial Cluster 62 Leningrad region the territory of successful investments PwC 1 Putevoditel-Eng_Layout 1 28.01.2015 15:17 Page 2 2 Leningrad region the territory of successful investments PwC Putevoditel-Eng_Layout 1 28.01.2015 15:17 Page 3 The Leningrad Region is rightfully considered to be one cial and economic actors. We need to create the condi- of the most attractive areas in Russia for investors. The re- tions for developing a «new» economy based on high- gion's economy is among north-western Russia's top perform- tech industries. To this end, a network of private and ers in terms of gross regional product. We are committed public industrial parks has been built in the Leningrad Re- not only to maintaining this leading position, but also trans- gion to cultivate business.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages of Investing in Leningrad Region
    www.lenoblinvest.ru Contents Foreword by the Governor Tax benefits 14 of Leningrad region 3 Industrial parks 15 General information 4 Territory of advanced social and economic Advantages of investing development Pikalevo 16 in Leningrad region 5 Territory of prospective development near commercial Economy 6 seaport of Ust-Luga 17 Industry 8 Success stories 18 Investors support 10 Contacts 22 Front Office for Investor Relations 12 Foreword by the Governor of Leningrad region Leningrad region strives to be among the We are open for dialogue with potential most successful regions in Russia. In order investors, our rules are simple and clear for to achieve this, the regional government takes business. We maintain transparent conditions for specific steps aimed at attraction of investments successful business established in the region. and support for entrepreneurial initiatives. Since 2013 the Front Office for Investor Relations Our region is one of the leaders of the Administration of Leningrad Region has of Northwestern Federal District in terms been working for comfortable interaction with of economic development and one of the investors and investment projects support largest industrial centres in Russia. Due to its on “one-stop-shop” principle significantly contributing unique geographical location and diversified to improvement of investment attractiveness of the economy the region is progressively increasing region. the volume of shipped industrial products. Due to concerted efforts of the team One of the most important priorities defined of Leningrad region we move forward and make in Socio-Economic Development Strategy the region attractive not only for Russian, but also of Leningrad Region up to 2030 is industrial for foreign investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor's Guide
    Contents General information 4 Business support infrastructure 14 Advantages of investing Economic Development Agency in Leningrad region 5 of Leningrad Region 16 Economy 6 Measures of support for business 18 Investment climate 7 Ongoing projects 26 Industry 8 Success stories 30 Territories of prospective 10 Contacts 34 development Introductory words Leningrad region is one of the largest main anti-crisis measures of support were industrial centers of Russia and holds leading adopted in the region as soon as possible; positions in the Northwestern Federal District the investment team always stays in touch in terms of the economic development. It is with the business and quickly reacts to the proven by the actual figures: the GRP of the changes, which take place. The efforts of the region has been growing by 2.5 times faster region were highly appraised at the federal than the GDP of Russia over the past 6 years. level – Leningrad region took the second A comprehensive activity, targeted at the place in the ranking of regions in terms of the attraction of investment and support of entrepreneurship supporting measures entrepreneurial initiatives, is carried out in during the pandemics, which was prepared Leningrad region, and the achievements of by the Presidential Commissioner for the region in terms of its investment policy Entrepreneurs’ Rights of Russia. are observed not only by the Russian, but The team of Leningrad region is open for also international business community. In dialogue with investors, and one of the key 2020, as the poll of the Russian-German platforms for direct interaction between the Chamber of Commerce showed, Leningrad representatives of Leningrad region and the region was included in top ten regions, which Russian and global community is the are most attractive for the German business, Baltic Regional Investment Forum BRIEF.
    [Show full text]