Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Summary of Community Meetings on the Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan KIMMIRUT January 10-11, 2013

Summary of Community Meetings on the Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan KIMMIRUT January 10-11, 2013

Summary of Community Meetings on the Draft Land Use Plan KIMMIRUT January 10-11, 2013

Revised - September 2013 Contents

Introduction ...... 3 Appendix 1: Open House ...... 17 1.1 Context ...... 3 Appendix 2: Elected Officials Meeting ...... 18 1.2 Purpose ...... 3 Appendix 3: Questions and Answers ...... 19 1.3 Methodology...... 3 Appendix 4: Community Workshop Scanned Maps ...... 20 1.4 Public Awareness ...... 3 Appendix 5: Wrap Up Session ...... 31 1.5 Community Population and Participation ...... 3 Appendix 6: Follow-up Meeting ...... 33

Protecting and Sustaining the Environment ...... 4 2.1 Areas presented to participants...... 4 2.2 Areas identified by participants ...... 4 2.3 Areas of importance to Protecting and Sustaining the Environment .. 4

Encouraging Conservation Planning ...... 6 3.1 Areas presented to participants ...... 6 3.2 Areas identified by participants ...... 6 3.3 Areas of importance to Encouraging Conservation Planning ...... 6

Building Healthier Communities ...... 8 4.1 Areas presented to participants...... 8 4.2 Areas identified by participants ...... 8 4.3 Areas of importance to Building Healthier Communities ...... 8

Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development ...... 10 5.1 Areas presented to participants...... 10 5.2 Areas identified by participants ...... 10 5.3 Areas of importance to Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development ...... 10

Mixed Use ...... 12 6.1 Areas identified in the Draft Plan ...... 12 6.2 Areas identified by participants ...... 12

Overlapping Goals ...... 15 7.1 Areas identified for multiple goals ...... 15

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  2 Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Context Comments and questions were recorded during the Organizations (HTO) in September 2012. In addition, letters of The Commission visited the community on January 10-11, session and are contained in Appendix 2. invitation were sent to the Kimmirut Mayor and Council and 2013. All events occurred as scheduled. The sessions were The Nunavut Planning Commission (NPC) is preparing a land HTO in advance of the NPC’s visit to advise of the meetings attended as follows; use plan to guide and direct resource use and development in  Public Workshop; A formal presentation of the Draft and to encourage participation. Follow up phone calls were the Nunavut Settlement Area (NSA). As part of its efforts, the Plan content was provided to participants, including a also made.  Elected Officials Meeting; the Mayor and members NPC is facilitating discussions in each Nunavut community on slide overview of its content. Following the of the Hamlet Council and HTO attended the elected land use and resource management issues. Information that is presentation, questions and comments were received Public notice of the various events was provided in the officials meeting. obtained from these discussions will be used to inform from participants. The questions, comments and following ways: decisions regarding the further development of the Nunavut responses are contained in Appendix 3.  Open house; approximately 50 people attended the Land Use Plan (NLUP).  Nunatsiaq News and Nunavut News/North; notice open house to review the Draft Plan. A mapping session followed the presentation of the of community meetings were posted in both 1.2 Purpose Draft Plan. The mapping session involved discussions newspapers a minimum of 45 days in advance.  Public Workshop; approximately 45 people attended regarding the topics presented in the DNLUP and the presentation of the DNLUP and facilitated encouraged participants to identify additional areas  Co-op cable TV; notice of community meetings was This report presents information obtained during the NPC’s mapping sessions. Information was recorded in two and issues important for inclusion in a NLUP. run a minimum of 45 days in advance for one week visit to the community of Kimmirut. The purpose of the report separate mapping groups. Information received during this session was recorded and run again for no less than 14 days before the is to inform decisions regarding the further development of by NPC staff and is included in Appendix 4. meetings. the NLUP, ensuring that the plan reflects the priorities and  Wrap Up Session; approximately 15 people attended values of residents. the wrap up session.  Wrap Up Session; Staff was available to discuss the  Community radio; notices were read by the hosts areas identified during the mapping and identify any It is important to note that the information contained in the and a live interview with the Commission Chairperson additional issues or areas of interest. Information Community Report will be considered in conjunction with all was conducted. received during this session was recorded by NPC other feedback when revising the DNLUP staff and is included in Appendix 5.  Community bulletin boards; notices were posted on

1.3 Methodology bulletin boards around the community 45 days and Areas that participants identified during mapping sessions as again 14 days in advance of the meetings.

important to a particular goal have, in the majority of cases, Information was presented to and received from participants in been included in this report as they were recorded. In  Community mail drop; one page flyers that Kimmirut in accordance with the Nunavut Planning instances where participants identified an area that was better announced the meetings and their purpose were Commission’s Community Engagement Strategy (Engagement suited to another goal, the area has been reclassified to the delivered to the post office in each community for all Strategy). The Engagement Strategy provides for the following more suitable goal and has been verified as appropriate to do mail boxes that accept unaddressed ad-mail. methods for presenting and receiving information; so by the Community.

 nunavut.ca; the schedule of community visits, the  Open house; information contained in the Draft A follow-up meeting was held on May 17, 2013 to review a Draft Plan, and all supporting information was Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP) was presented on 7 draft version of this report with the Hamlet Council, Hunters available on the Commission’s website. multi lingual large format poster boards. Participants and Trappers Organization, and Community Lands and

were encouraged to review the posters, ask questions Resource Committee. A summary of this meeting is included in and provide feedback. Comments and questions were Appendix 6. 1.5 Community Population and recorded by NPC staff and are contained in Appendix Participation 1. 1.4 Public Awareness

Kimmirut is a community of approximately 455 people Figure 1. Location of Kimmirut  Elected Officials Meeting; The NPC Chairperson and The NPC raised public awareness regarding its visit to Kimmirut (Statistics Canada. 2011 Census). It is located on the southern NPC staff met with senior and elected officials in the in accordance with the Engagement Strategy. coast of (see Figure 1). community. The development process for the DNLUP, its content and next steps were presented. The DNLUP and supporting materials were mailed to the Mayor and Council of Kimmirut, the Hunters and Trappers

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  3 Chapter 2: Protecting and Sustaining the Environment

Protecting and Sustaining the Environment was one of five 2.3 Areas of importance to Protecting and topics presented to and discussed by participants during the Sustaining the Environment Open House, Elected Officials Meeting, Public Workshop and

Wrap up Session, collectively referred to in this document as Areas and issues discussed during the information sharing and information sharing and gathering sessions. gathering sessions as important to Protecting and Sustaining 2.1 Areas presented to participants the Environment are illustrated on Map 1, including areas identified in the DNLUP and areas identified by the

community. Scanned images of the maps on which During the information sharing and gathering sessions, community feedback was recorded can be found in Appendix participants were presented the following areas and issues as 4. important to Protecting and Sustaining the Environment. Based on discussions with participants, the NPC understands  Key bird habitat sites that:

 Caribou Habitat sites  The areas identified on Map 1 are considered by the Community to be important to Protecting and  Atlantic Cod Lakes Sustaining the Environment.

 Cumulative Impacts  In these areas, the community would like the NLUP to encourage activities that support environmental

protection and management needs, including wildlife  Transboundary considerations conservation, protection and management.

 Climate change This feedback will be considered in conjunction with all other feedback when revising the DNLUP. The importance of these issues and areas to Protecting and

Sustaining the Environment was not disputed by participants during the information sharing and gathering sessions.

2.2 Areas identified by participants

Additional areas and issues were identified by participants as important to Protecting and Sustaining the Environment during the information sharing and gathering sessions. These additional areas are;

 Important bird areas

 Walrus areas

 Fishing areas

 Hunting areas

 Polar bear habitat

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  4 PROTECTING AND SUSTAINING THE ENVIRONMENT (PSE) • KIMMIRUT • MAP 1

PSE Goal areas from the DNLUP discussed during community consultations Additional PSE Goal areas identified during community consultations

Nunavut 1:70,000,000 ! Alert G L

Goal areas discussed during community consultations represent the generalized goal areas presented from the Draft N T Kimmirut Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Goal areas ^_ do not represent specific designations and recommendations as layed out in the

DNLUP. For more information on these ! areas please refer to the DNLUP and the Eureka AB SK MB QC Options and Recommendations document. ON Information collected in communities will 500 0 500 1000 1500 be considered in conjunction with all other Kilometres feedback when revising the DNLUP and will be part of the Consultation Record.

Grise Fiord !

! Resolute

! !

O u t er L a n d ! F a s Clyde River t I c e

Z o n e

! ! ! ! ! ! Hall Beach ! ! !

!

! Bathurst Inlet ! Repulse Bay

!

! Cape Dorset ! Kimmirut ! Baker Lake !

Chesterfield Inlet !

!

! Whale Cove

!

!

1:9,600,000 250 125 0 250 500 For Data Sources see Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Areas identified by community collected as part of the Nunavut Planning Commissions Community Engagement Kilometres Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Strategty during the Mapping Sessions for the DNLUP on Conic, NAD83 January 10 & 11, 2013. Maps were digitized at the Nunavut Produced by the Nunavut Planning Planning Commission. Commission: (867)983-4625, To be used for illustration purposes only as part of the Draft [email protected] $ June-24-13 Nunavut Land Use Plan Consultation Process.

Chapter 3: Encouraging Conservation Planning

Encouraging Conservation Planning was one of five topics 3.3 Areas of importance to Encouraging presented to and discussed by the participants during the Conservation Planning information sharing and gathering sessions.

3.1 Areas presented to participants Areas and issues discussed during the information sharing and gathering sessions as important to Encouraging Conservation

Planning are illustrated on Map 2, including areas identified in During the information sharing and gathering sessions, the DNLUP and areas identified by the community. Scanned participants were presented the following areas and issues as images of the maps on which community feedback was important to Encouraging Conservation Planning; recorded can be found in Appendix 4.  National Parks Awaiting Full Establishment Based on discussions with participants, the NPC understands

that:  Proposed National Parks  The areas identified on Map 2 are considered by the  National Marine Conservation Areas Community to be important to Encouraging Conservation Planning.

 Thelon Wildlife Sanctuary  In these areas, the community would like the NLUP to encourage activities that support environmental  Migratory Bird Sanctuaries protection and management needs, including wildlife conservation, protection and management.  National Wildlife Areas This feedback will be considered in conjunction with all other  National Historic Sites feedback when revising the DNLUP.

 Territorial Historic Sites

 Heritage Rivers

The importance of these issues and areas to Encouraging Conservation Planning was not disputed by participants during the information sharing and gathering sessions.

3.2 Areas identified by participants

Additional areas and issues were identified by participants as important to Encouraging Conservation Planning during the information sharing and gathering sessions. These additional areas are.

 Traditional camping areas

 Eider duck nesting

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  6 ENCOURAGING CONSERVATION PLANNING (ECP) • KIMMIRUT • MAP 2

ECP Goal areas from the DNLUP discussed during community consultations Additional ECP Goal areas identified during community consultations

Nunavut 1:70,000,000 ! Alert G L

Goal areas discussed during community consultations represent the generalized goal areas presented from the Draft N T Kimmirut Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Goal areas ^_ do not represent specific designations and recommendations as layed out in the

DNLUP. For more information on these ! areas please refer to the DNLUP and the Eureka AB SK MB QC Options and Recommendations document. ON Information collected in communities will 500 0 500 1000 1500 be considered in conjunction with all other Kilometres feedback when revising the DNLUP and will be part of the Consultation Record.

Grise Fiord !

! Resolute

! ! Pond Inlet Arctic Bay

O u t er L a n d ! F a s Clyde River t I c e

Z o n e

! Qikiqtarjuaq ! Igloolik ! ! Cambridge Bay Taloyoak ! ! Hall Beach Kugluktuk ! Gjoa Haven ! Kugaaruk! Pangnirtung

! Umingmaktok

! Bathurst Inlet ! Repulse Bay

! Iqaluit

! Cape Dorset ! Kimmirut Coral Harbour ! Baker Lake !

Chesterfield Inlet !

! Rankin Inlet

! Whale Cove

! Arviat

! Sanikiluaq

1:9,600,000 250 125 0 250 500 For Data Sources see Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Areas identified by community collected as part of the Nunavut Planning Commissions Community Engagement Kilometres Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Strategty during the Mapping Sessions for the DNLUP on Conic, NAD83 January 10 & 11, 2013. Maps were digitized at the Nunavut Produced by the Nunavut Planning Planning Commission. Commission: (867)983-4625, To be used for illustration purposes only as part of the Draft [email protected] $ June-24-13 Nunavut Land Use Plan Consultation Process.

Chapter 4: Building Healthier Communities

Building Healthier Communities was one of five topics  Camping areas/drinking water presented to and discussed by the participants during the information sharing and gathering sessions.  Polar bear hunting area

4.1 Areas presented to participants 4.3 Areas of importance to Building During the information sharing and gathering sessions, participants were presented the following areas and issues as Healthier Communities important to Building Healthier Communities; Areas and issues discussed during the information sharing and  Areas of Community Interest gathering sessions as important to Building Healthier Communities are illustrated on Map 3, including areas  Community Land Use identified in the DNLUP and areas identified by the community. Scanned images of the maps on which  Transportation Infrastructure community feedback was recorded can be found in Appendix 4.  Unincorporated Communities Based on discussions with participants, the NPC understands

that:  Alternative Energy Sources  The areas identified on Map 3 are considered by the  Community drinking water supplies Community to be important to Building Healthier Communities.  Land remediation  In these areas, the community would like the NLUP to encourage activities that support community needs  Northern Contaminated Sites Program and cultural priorities.

 Aerodromes This feedback will be considered in conjunction with all other feedback when revising the DNLUP.  Canadian Forces Station

 Northern Warning System sites

The importance of these issues and areas to Building Healthier Communities was not disputed by participants.

4.2 Areas identified by participants

Additional areas and issues were identified by participants as important to contributing to the goal of Building Healthier Communities during the information sharing and gathering sessions. These additional areas are;

 Contaminated sites

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  8 BUILDING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES (BHC) • KIMMIRUT • MAP 3

BHC Goal areas from the DNLUP discussed during community consultations Additional BHC Goal areas identified during community consultations

Nunavut 1:70,000,000 ! Alert G L

Goal areas discussed during community consultations represent the generalized goal areas presented from the Draft N T Kimmirut Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Goal areas ^_ do not represent specific designations and recommendations as layed out in the

DNLUP. For more information on these ! areas please refer to the DNLUP and the Eureka AB SK MB QC Options and Recommendations document. ON Information collected in communities will 500 0 500 1000 1500 be considered in conjunction with all other Kilometres feedback when revising the DNLUP and will be part of the Consultation Record.

Grise Fiord !

! Resolute

! ! Pond Inlet Arctic Bay

O u t er L a n d ! F a s Clyde River t I c e

Z o n e

! Qikiqtarjuaq ! Igloolik ! ! Cambridge Bay Taloyoak ! ! Hall Beach Kugluktuk ! Gjoa Haven ! Kugaaruk! Pangnirtung

! Umingmaktok

! Bathurst Inlet ! Repulse Bay

! Iqaluit

! Cape Dorset ! Kimmirut Coral Harbour ! Baker Lake !

Chesterfield Inlet !

! Rankin Inlet

! Whale Cove

! Arviat

! Sanikiluaq

1:9,600,000 250 125 0 250 500 For Data Sources see Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Areas identified by community collected as part of the Nunavut Planning Commissions Community Engagement Kilometres Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Strategty during the Mapping Sessions for the DNLUP on Conic, NAD83 January 10 & 11, 2013. Maps were digitized at the Nunavut Produced by the Nunavut Planning Planning Commission. Commission: (867)983-4625, To be used for illustration purposes only as part of the Draft [email protected] $ June-24-13 Nunavut Land Use Plan Consultation Process.

Chapter 5: Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development

Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development was one of areas identified in the DNLUP and areas identified by the five topics presented to and discussed by the participants community. Scanned images of the maps on which during the information sharing and gathering sessions. community feedback was recorded can be found in Appendix 4. 5.1 Areas presented to participants Based on discussions with participants, the NPC understands

that: During the information sharing and gathering sessions, participants were presented with the following areas  The areas identified on Map 4 are considered by the important to Encouraging Sustainable Economic Community to be important to Encouraging Development; Sustainable Economic Development.

 Mineral Exploration and Production  In these areas, the community would like the NLUP to encourage activities that support economic  Oil and Gas Exploration opportunities and needs.

This feedback will be considered in conjunction with all other  Commercial Fisheries feedback when revising the DNLUP.

The importance of these issues and areas to Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development was not disputed by participants during the information sharing and gathering sessions.

5.2 Areas identified by participants

Additional areas and issues were identified by participants as important to Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development during the information sharing and gathering sessions. The additional areas identified are;

 Commercial fisheries

 Sports hunting

 Soapstone quarries

5.3 Areas of importance to Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development

Areas and issues discussed during the information sharing and gathering sessions as important to Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development are illustrated on Map 4, including

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  10 ENCOURAGING SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ESED) • KIMMIRUT • MAP 4

ESED Goal areas from the DNLUP discussed during community consultations Additional ESED Goal areas identified during community consultations

Nunavut 1:70,000,000 ! Alert G L

Goal areas discussed during community consultations represent the generalized goal areas presented from the Draft N T Kimmirut Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Goal areas ^_ do not represent specific designations and recommendations as layed out in the

DNLUP. For more information on these ! areas please refer to the DNLUP and the Eureka AB SK MB QC Options and Recommendations document. ON Information collected in communities will 500 0 500 1000 1500 be considered in conjunction with all other Kilometres feedback when revising the DNLUP and will be part of the Consultation Record.

Grise Fiord !

! Resolute

! ! Pond Inlet Arctic Bay

O u t er L a n d ! F a s Clyde River t I c e

Z o n e

! Qikiqtarjuaq ! Igloolik ! ! Cambridge Bay Taloyoak ! ! Hall Beach Kugluktuk ! Gjoa Haven ! Kugaaruk! Pangnirtung

! Umingmaktok

! Bathurst Inlet ! Repulse Bay

! Iqaluit

! Cape Dorset ! Kimmirut Coral Harbour ! Baker Lake !

Chesterfield Inlet !

! Rankin Inlet

! Whale Cove

! Arviat

! Sanikiluaq

1:9,600,000 250 125 0 250 500 For Data Sources see Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Areas identified by community collected as part of the Nunavut Planning Commissions Community Engagement Kilometres Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Strategty during the Mapping Sessions for the DNLUP on Conic, NAD83 January 10 & 11, 2013. Maps were digitized at the Nunavut Produced by the Nunavut Planning Planning Commission. Commission: (867)983-4625, To be used for illustration purposes only as part of the Draft [email protected] $ June-24-13 Nunavut Land Use Plan Consultation Process. Chapter 6: Mixed Use

6.1 Areas identified in the Draft Plan

The DNLUP identifies areas important for a variety of uses. These areas were presented to participants during the workshop as Mixed Use Areas. These areas, as they occur around the community, are illustrated on Map 5.

6.2 Areas identified by participants

No additional areas were identified as Mixed Use by participants. However, some areas identified as Mixed Use in the DNLUP were considered by participants to require additional protection because of their particular qualities. These areas and the goals they are important for are identified on Map 6.

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  12 MIXED USE (MU) • KIMMIRUT • MAP 5

MU Goal areas from DNLUP discussed during community consultations

Nunavut 1:70,000,000 ! Alert G L

Goal areas discussed during community consultations represent the generalized goal areas presented from the Draft N T Kimmirut Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Goal areas ^_ do not represent specific designations and recommendations as layed out in the

DNLUP. For more information on these ! areas please refer to the DNLUP and the Eureka AB SK MB QC Options and Recommendations document. ON Information collected in communities will 500 0 500 1000 1500 be considered in conjunction with all other Kilometres feedback when revising the DNLUP and will be part of the Consultation Record.

Grise Fiord !

! Resolute

! ! Pond Inlet Arctic Bay

O u t er L a n d ! F a s Clyde River t I c e

Z o n e

! Qikiqtarjuaq ! Igloolik ! ! Cambridge Bay Taloyoak ! ! Hall Beach Kugluktuk ! Gjoa Haven ! Kugaaruk! Pangnirtung

! Umingmaktok

! Bathurst Inlet ! Repulse Bay

! Iqaluit

! Cape Dorset ! Kimmirut Coral Harbour ! Baker Lake !

Chesterfield Inlet !

! Rankin Inlet

! Whale Cove

! Arviat

! Sanikiluaq

1:9,600,000 250 125 0 250 500 For Data Sources see Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Areas identified by community collected as part of the Nunavut Planning Commissions Community Engagement Kilometres Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Strategty during the Mapping Sessions for the DNLUP on Conic, NAD83 January 10 & 11, 2013. Maps were digitized at the Nunavut Produced by the Nunavut Planning Planning Commission. Commission: (867)983-4625, To be used for illustration purposes only as part of the Draft [email protected] $ June-24-13 Nunavut Land Use Plan Consultation Process. MIXED USE (MU) • KIMMIRUT • MAP 6

Additional PSE Goal areas identified during community consultations Additional BHC Goal areas identified during community consultations

Nunavut 1:70,000,000 ! Alert G L

Goal areas discussed during community consultations represent the generalized goal areas presented from the Draft N T Kimmirut Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Goal areas ^_ do not represent specific designations and recommendations as layed out in the

DNLUP. For more information on these ! areas please refer to the DNLUP and the Eureka AB SK MB QC Options and Recommendations document. ON Information collected in communities will 500 0 500 1000 1500 be considered in conjunction with all other Kilometres feedback when revising the DNLUP and will be part of the Consultation Record.

Grise Fiord !

! Resolute

! ! Pond Inlet Arctic Bay

O u t er L a n d ! F a s Clyde River t I c e

Z o n e

! Qikiqtarjuaq ! Igloolik ! ! Cambridge Bay Taloyoak ! ! Hall Beach Kugluktuk ! Gjoa Haven ! Kugaaruk! Pangnirtung

! Umingmaktok

! Bathurst Inlet ! Repulse Bay

! Iqaluit

! Cape Dorset ! Kimmirut Coral Harbour ! Baker Lake !

Chesterfield Inlet !

! Rankin Inlet

! Whale Cove

! Arviat

! Sanikiluaq

1:9,600,000 250 125 0 250 500 For Data Sources see Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan (DNLUP). Areas identified by community collected as part of the Nunavut Planning Commissions Community Engagement Kilometres Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Strategty during the Mapping Sessions for the DNLUP on Conic, NAD83 January 10 & 11, 2013. Maps were digitized at the Nunavut Produced by the Nunavut Planning Planning Commission. Commission: (867)983-4625, To be used for illustration purposes only as part of the Draft [email protected] $ April-23-13 Nunavut Land Use Plan Consultation Process.

Chapter 7: Overlapping Goals

7.1 Areas identified for multiple goals

All areas discussed with the community as important for a particular goal are shown on Map 7. In some instances, areas have been identified as important for multiple goals. These areas, and the specific goals they are important to, are also shown on Map 7. In these areas, the NPC will take all of the identified goals and all other feedback into consideration when revising the DNLUP.

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  15 K I Kimmirut • Map 7 I G C D C A C Overlapping Goal Areas G K G I C Hall Beach A K A C D D K Pangnirtung D A C 1:100,000,000 A K G K - D N D 1 Goal Identified in area D C I N 2 Goals Identified in area K C H N 3 Goals Identified in areaD 4 Goals Identified in area D A D A A I

G P C A D B G N D C Established Parks (Land Use Plan does not apply) I Administrative BoundaryD K Repulse Bay D A C N 1:3,000,000 I C 0 50 100 Kilometres A D G F D Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic, NAD83 Iqaluit Areas identified by communityN collected as part C of theC Nunavut Planning Commissions K E I A K Community Engagement Strategty during the K A B P F Mapping Sessions for the DNLUPD on January 10 N E N N M & 11, 2013. Maps wereK digitized at the Nunavut L I L M G K B Planning Commission. I L G N G P N To be used for illustration purposes only as part F D G P of the draft Nunavut Land Use Plan consultation C A P P M E L process. Produced by the Nunavut Planning Cape Dorset N A Commission (NPC), 23/03/2013. L P P L A K P O KimmirutG L I M N M K PM P P K G A PLP K N N I P N P F P P L P L D G L F L A G Coral Harbour G B G G F K C L I Label GoalsA in Area APSE C C BA ECP C BHCB C G D ESEDF G D G E PSE, GECP F BHC, ECP G BHC, PSE H ESED, ECP A $ I ESED, PSE C G K BHC, ESED L BHC, PSE, ECP A M BHC, ESED, ECP G N BHC, ESED, PSE O ESED, PSE, ECP P All Goals (BHC, ESED, PSE, ECP) G

Appendix 1: Open House

During the open house, participants raised the following issues:

 Elders tell us the areas that are important. They know a lot and tell the younger people important areas

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  17

Appendix 2: Elected Officials Meeting

The elected officials meeting was attended by the Mayor and members of the Hamlet Council and HTO. During the meeting, participants raised the following issues:

 Question: When doe the plan apply to projects that are transboundary with the municipality? o The Commission responded that it depends on the project. Generally, municipal activities are not projects. But a mine or industrial activity is, and would be subject to the plan.

 There are parks in place but there are many areas that have not been explored.

 The community currently has a high unemployment rate.

 Sometimes the community is split in how they want activity to proceed.

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  18 Appendix 3: Questions and Answers

During the community workshop, there was a question and answer period, which included a discussion of the following topics:

 Terminology question over the Inuktitut term for “Conservation Area”. o The Commission clarified the use of the term.

 There are issues understanding different dialects. A terminology handbook would be useful.

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  19

Appendix 4: Community Workshop Scanned Maps

Two groups completed the mapping session to identify important areas. This Appendix contains the maps that were used by participants to identify areas that are important to the following land use planning goals:

 Protecting and Sustaining the Environment

 Encouraging Conservation Planning

 Building Healthier Communities

 Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development

 Mixed Use

Also included on each map is a reference table that includes the specific values that were identified for the area.

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  20

Appendix 5: Wrap Up Session

A small group of participants returned to identify additional important areas during the wrap up session.

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  31

Appendix 6: Follow-up Meeting

The NPC returned to the community to review a draft version of this report with the Hamlet Council, Hunters and Trappers Organization, and Community Lands and Resource Committee. The meeting included:

 A presentation of a draft version of this report

 An overview of the mapped information that was recorded for each topic:

o Protecting and Sustaining the Environment

o Encouraging Conservation Planning

o Building Healthier Communities

o Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development

o Mixed Use

 General discussion and comments including:

o Timelines for completion

o Opportunities to provide additional comments

o Interest in seeing how a revised plan will manage mining in the area (lots of gems nearby)

o Discussion about how the community can start using the information that was collected now

Summary of Community Meetings – Kimmirut, January 10-11, 2013  33