DOCSLIB.ORG

Sino-Tibetan Languages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sino-Tibetan Languages Sino-Tibetan languages Huba Bartos http://budling.nytud.hu/~bartos/kurzus/kinai.html The Sino-Tibetan language family 2nd largest lg. family (number of native speakers; 2nd only to Indo-European) cca. 350–400 lg’s (9 has >1 million speakers) longer written tradition: Chinese ( >3000 yrs), Tibetan (cca. 1300 yrs), Burmese (cca. 900 yrs) many uncertainties in classification (← few of these lg’s have script, and even those are often not phonetic + a mix of genetic vs. areal relations) Geographical distribution Source: WALS Geographical distribution Source: G. Jacques Language families in East Asia Sino-Tibetan Austroasiatic Austronesian Tai-Kadai Hmong-Mien Source: G. Jacques … and the Altaic languages Source: G. Jacques Speakers of ST languages The largest ST languages : – Chinese: 1.3 billion – Burmese: 42 million – Lolo / Yi ( 彝): 7 million – Tibetan: 6 million – Karen: 5 million – Dzongkha (Bhutanese): 1.5 million – Bodo: 1.5 million – Naga: 1.2 million – Jingphaw: 1 million A little bit of history of science The development of the Sino-Tibetan hypothesis Early errors John C. Leyden (1808): Indo-Chinese family – lg’s of the region spanning from India to China, as well as lg’s of the ‘Eastern Seas’ Max Müller (1855): Turanic theory (Ural-Altaic + Dravidian ( + Caucasian?) lg’s ( + Chinese?) ( + Japanese?)) – mostly relying on typological features (rather than a comparative basis) – (Turanic = ’the rest’: Eurasian lg’s = Semitic (Afroasiatic) + Aryan (Indo-European) + Turanic ) Early moves in the right direction Julius Heinrich Klaproth (1823): Tibetan and Chinese are close relatives, but Vietnamese and Thai do not belong to the same family key difficulty: Chinese writing has never been consistently phonetic therefore: it tells us next to nothing about Old and Proto-Chinese morphology, and its potential complexity → difficult to support any genealogical hypotheses Early moves in the right direction And yet: C.R. Lepsius (1861): Old Chinese could have certain morphological traits (affixes) that have disappeared by now (and may, e.g., be the predecessors of tones) Wilhelm Grube (1881): Old Chinese probably had affixal elements Tibeto-Burman Nathan Brown (1854): the Karen lg. is genetically related to Tibetan, Burmese, Jinghpaw, and other Himalayan lg’s James R. Logan (1859): Tibeto-Burman lg family (including Karen) Indo-Chinese → Sino- Tibetan August Conrady (1896): Indo-Chinese = Tibeto-Burman + Chinese + Kadai – attempted to prove this hypothesis on grounds of grammar similarities Jean Przyluski (1924): „sino-tibétain” (the French translation of the term „Indo-Chinese” ) – Hmong-Mien lg’s also included (on the Kadai (’Sino-Daic’) branch) Indo-Chinese → Sino- Tibetan → „Sino-Tibetan” = rebranded and corrected „Indo-Chinese” (?) Indo-Chinese = Sino-Tibetan Sino-Thai Tibeto-Burman Or (without Karen) Sino-Daic Tai-Kadai Chinese (incl.: Hmong-Mien) Robert Shafer (1893-1973?) worked in the Sino-Tibetan philology project at UC Berkeley Shafer was NOT a trained comparative linguist, but spent enormous efforts on classifying a vast body of data from/on ST-languages Robert Shafer Shafer (1966–1974): hesitations concerning the primary branches, as well as the status of the Kadai langauges Sino-Tibetan Chinese Daic Bodic Burmese Baric Karen Robert Shafer Shafer (1966–1974): hesitations concerning the primary branches, as well as the status of the Kadai langauges Sino-Tibetan Chinese Tibeto-Burman Daic Robert Shafer Old Chinese Written Tib. Written Brm. meaning *ngag 我 nga Na ‘I' *s´m 三 gsum su^m ‘three' *ngag 五 lnga Na^ ‘five' *mj´k 目 mig mjak ‘eye' *ngjag 鱼 nya Na^ ‘fish' *khwin 犬 khyi khwe ‘dog' *srat 杀 bsat sat ‘kill' *sjin 薪 shing sac ‘firewood' *mjing 名 ming ´-man) ‘name’ *khag 苦 kha kha^ ‘bitter' Beyond cognate words: structural similarities – many of these lg’s are tonal (e.g., Chinese, Lhasa Tibetan, Burmese) – typically monosyllabic and morphologically analitic (isolating) – frequent use of classsifiers – SVO (Chin., Karen, Bai) vs. SOV (all other TB) BUT: how much of this is due to areal influences? AND: whence the lack of systematic sound correspondences? Indosphere ~ Sinosphere division of the TB-branch by typological and cultural traits: Indosphere vs. Sinosphere (acc. to the dominance of Indo-Aryan vs. Chinese languages) Indosphere Sinosphere synthetic/agglutinative analytic/isolating polisyllabicity monosyllabicity non-tonal tonal Shafer’s ”heritage” Paul K. Benedict (1941/1972, 1976): Sino-Tibetan ST = Chinese + Tibeto- Burman/Tibeto-Karen – expels the Kadai lg’s from Tibeto-Karen Chinese ST; problems of the family tree (Stammbaum) representation – basis of the currently Tibeto-Burman Karen most widely known and accepted hypothesis Shafer’s ”heritage” Paul K. Benedict (1941/1972, 1976): Sino-Tibetan ST = Chinese + Tibeto- Burman/Tibeto-Karen – expels the Kadai lg’s from Tibeto-Burman Chinese ST; problems of the family tree (Stammbaum) representation – basis of the currently most widely known and accepted hypothesis But what do the Chinese say? (Li Fang-Kuei (李方桂), Luo Changpei (罗常培)) The great summary of the ST- hypothesis: Matisoff / STEDT James A. Matisoff (2003) Proto-Sino-Tibetan homeland: on the Himalayan Plateau, in the source region of the great rivers (Huanghe, Yangtze, Mekong, Brahmaputra, Salween, Irrawaddy), up to cca. 4000 STEDT project: http://stedt.berkeley.edu/index.html The great summary of the ST- hypothesis: Matisoff / STEDT homeland ? The great summary of the ST- hypothesis: Matisoff / STEDT STEDT and the age of great changes reconstruction of Old Chinese: a revision of Karlgren’s system (Pulleyblank, Jaxontov, Li Fang-Kuei, Coblin, Baxter, …) exploration of Proto-ST morphology (Sagart, Baxter) on the TB side: fieldwork → significant body of new data, new lg descriptions STEDT and the age of great changes → Benedict’s system can and must be thoroughly revised ° results from other fields and disciplines must be added / taken into consideration: archeology, genetics → a whole new interdisciplinary approach Some recent proposals Nicholas Bodman (1980): Tibetan is a closer relative of Chinese than of other Himalayan and Burman languages → Sino-Himalayan hypothesis Sino-Himalayan Tibeto-Burman Sino-Tibetan (Himalayan) Chinese Tibetan Some recent proposals Sergei A. Starostin (1994): the closest relatives of Chinese within TB are Kiranti (Bodic etc.) lg’s → Sino-Kiranti hypothesis Sino-Tibetan Sino-Kiranti Tibeto-Burman Chinese Kiranti Some recent proposals Starostin redux (2005): under the influence of Nostratic theory – Sino-Dené-Caucasian Variations on the Sino-Bodic theme: Van Driem primary basis: newly reconstructed OC and well described TB morphological patterns (Van Driem 1997) lexicostatistic, archeological and genetic evidence is sought to support/complement the linguistic model (Van Driem 1999) Variations on the Sino-Bodic theme: Van Driem Proto-TB homeland: in Sichuan, up to about 10.000 B.C. PTB Western TB Eastern TB NorthernTB Southern TB Eastern neolithic c. of India NW-TB NE-TB Lolo-Burmese, Majiayao neolithic c. Yangshao neol. c. Karen, Qiangic Bodic Sinitic Variations on the Sino-Bodic theme: Van Driem Van Driem v2.0 (2011): Trans- Himalayan ”fallen leaves” Sino-Austronesian: Sagart Laurent Sagart (1993, 1995, 2005): seeks genetic relation with Austronesian langauges – v1.0: Sino-Austronesian + remote/ questioned link b/w Chinese and TB – v1.5: Sino – Tibeto-Burman – Austronesian – v2.0: ‘Tibeto-Burmo – Austronesian’ (?) Sino-Austronesian: Sagart Proto- Old Chinese Tibeto-Burman meaning Austronesian *punuq *nuk 脑 (s-)nuk ‘brain’ *qiCeluR *c ´-lo(r?) 卵 twiy ‘egg’ *-kut *m-khut 掘 kot (Jingphaw ) ‘dig’ *nunux *nok 乳 nuw ‘breast’ *uRung *k-rok 角 rung ‘horn’ *kurung *k ´-rong 笼 krungH ‘cage’ Sino-Austronesian: Sagart And a denial… Ch. Beckwith: – Chinese is NOT related to Tibeto-Burman at all – absence of regular sound correspondences – no reconstructible common morphology – shared lexical items: not cognates but borrowings (Chinese → TB) Literature Beckwith, Ch. 2002. The Sino-Tibetan problem, in: Beckwith, Ch. Medieval Tibeto- Burman languages , Brill, Leiden, pp. 113–158 Benedict, P.K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, UK) van Driem, G. 1997. Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the SOAS 60: 455-488. van Driem, G. 1999. A new theory on the origin of Chinese. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin 18: 43-58. van Driem, G. 2011. The Trans-Himalayan Phylum and its Implications for Population Prehistory. Communication on Contemporary Anthropology, 2011, 5, 135-142/ e20 Li Fang-Kuei 1973. 'Languages and Dialects of China'. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1: 1-13 Ma Xueliang 1991. A General Introduction to Sino-Tibetan Languages . (Beijing University Press, Beijing) Matisoff, J.A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman (Univ. of California Press, L.A.) Shafer, R. 1966-1974. Introduction to Sino-Tibetan I-IV. (Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden) Sagart, L. 1993. Chinese and Austronesian: Evidence for a genetic relationship. Journal of Chinese Linguistics , 21(1): 1–62. Sagart, L. 2005. Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: an updated and improved argument. In: L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (szerk.) The Peopling of East Asia:Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics (RoutledgeCurzon, London) Thurgood, G. & R. LaPolla (eds.) 2006. The Sino-Tibetan Languages. (Routledge, London).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research on the Time When Ping Split Into Yin and Yang in Chinese Northern Dialect
    Chinese Studies 2014. Vol.3, No.1, 19-23 Published Online February 2014 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/chnstd) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/chnstd.2014.31005 Research on the Time When Ping Split into Yin and Yang in Chinese Northern Dialect Ma Chuandong1*, Tan Lunhua2 1College of Fundamental Education, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China 2Sichuan Science and Technology University for Employees, Chengdu, China Email: *[email protected] Received January 7th, 2014; revised February 8th, 2014; accepted February 18th, 2014 Copyright © 2014 Ma Chuandong, Tan Lunhua. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In accordance of the Creative Commons Attribution License all Copyrights © 2014 are reserved for SCIRP and the owner of the intellectual property Ma Chuandong, Tan Lun- hua. All Copyright © 2014 are guarded by law and by SCIRP as a guardian. The phonetic phenomenon “ping split into yin and yang” 平分阴阳 is one of the most important changes of Chinese tones in the early modern Chinese, which is reflected clearly in Zhongyuan Yinyun 中原音韵 by Zhou Deqing 周德清 (1277-1356) in the Yuan Dynasty. The authors of this paper think the phe- nomenon “ping split into yin and yang” should not have occurred so late as in the Yuan Dynasty, based on previous research results and modern Chinese dialects, making use of historical comparative method and rhyming books. The changes of tones have close relationship with the voiced and voiceless initials in Chinese, and the voiced initials have turned into voiceless in Song Dynasty, so it could not be in the Yuan Dynasty that ping split into yin and yang, but no later than the Song Dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Style, Wit and Word-Play
    Style, Wit and Word-Play Style, Wit and Word-Play: Essays in Translation Studies in Memory of David Hawkes Edited by Tao Tao Liu, Laurence K. P. Wong and Chan Sin-wai Style, Wit and Word-Play: Essays in Translation Studies in Memory of David Hawkes, Edited by Tao Tao Liu, Laurence K. P. Wong and Chan Sin-wai This book first published 2012 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2012 by Tao Tao Liu, Laurence K. P. Wong and Chan Sin-wai and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-3571-4, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-3571-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................... vii Tao Tao Liu, Laurence K. P. Wong and Chan Sin-wai INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ ix “STYLE, WIT AND WORD-PLAY” – REMEMBERING DAVID HAWKES (1923-2009) Tao Tao Liu A TRIBUTE TO BROTHER STONE ................................................................... 1 John Minford WHAT IS THE POINT OF MAKING TRANSLATIONS INTO ENGLISH OF CHINESE LITERATURE: RE-EXAMINING ARTHUR WALEY AND DAVID HAWKES ......... 15 Tao Tao Liu SURPRISING THE MUSES: DAVI D HAWKES’ A LITTLE PRIMER OF TU FU ...... 33 Laurence K. P. Wong MIND THE GAP: THE HAWKES-MINFORD TRANSITION IN THE STORY OF THE STONE ..................................................................... 115 Chloë Starr THE TRANSLATOR AS SCHOLAR AND EDITOR: ON PREPARING A NEW CHINESE TEXT FOR THE BILINGUAL THE STORY OF THE STONE ................
    [Show full text]
  • Script Crisis and Literary Modernity in China, 1916-1958 Zhong Yurou
    Script Crisis and Literary Modernity in China, 1916-1958 Zhong Yurou Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Yurou Zhong All rights reserved ABSTRACT Script Crisis and Literary Modernity in China, 1916-1958 Yurou Zhong This dissertation examines the modern Chinese script crisis in twentieth-century China. It situates the Chinese script crisis within the modern phenomenon of phonocentrism – the systematic privileging of speech over writing. It depicts the Chinese experience as an integral part of a worldwide crisis of non-alphabetic scripts in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It places the crisis of Chinese characters at the center of the making of modern Chinese language, literature, and culture. It investigates how the script crisis and the ensuing script revolution intersect with significant historical processes such as the Chinese engagement in the two World Wars, national and international education movements, the Communist revolution, and national salvation. Since the late nineteenth century, the Chinese writing system began to be targeted as the roadblock to literacy, science and democracy. Chinese and foreign scholars took the abolition of Chinese script to be the condition of modernity. A script revolution was launched as the Chinese response to the script crisis. This dissertation traces the beginning of the crisis to 1916, when Chao Yuen Ren published his English article “The Problem of the Chinese Language,” sweeping away all theoretical oppositions to alphabetizing the Chinese script. This was followed by two major movements dedicated to the task of eradicating Chinese characters: First, the Chinese Romanization Movement spearheaded by a group of Chinese and international scholars which was quickly endorsed by the Guomingdang (GMD) Nationalist government in the 1920s; Second, the dissident Chinese Latinization Movement initiated in the Soviet Union and championed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SINO-TIBETAN LANGUAGE FAMILY 汉藏语系 1. General Information – Has the 2Nd Largest Native Speaker Community (After
    IntroChinLing ST/ 1 Bartos THE SINO-TIBETAN LANGUAGE FAMILY 汉藏语系 1. General information – has the 2nd largest native speaker community (after the Indo-European family): > 1.1 billion; acc. to some estimations: cca. 250–300 independent languages – many cases of uncertainty in relationships ( ← few of these lg’s have writing systems, and many of those are not phonetic + genetic vs. areal effects) – longer written tradition: Chinese (cca. 3500 yrs), Tibetan 藏语 (cca. 1300 yrs), Burmese 缅 甸语 (cca. 900 yrs) – cultural split: Indosphere – Sinosphere (acc. to the dominant culture) - synthetic/agglutinative - analytic/isolating - polisyllabic - monosyllabic - non-tonal - tonal 2. The basis of genetic affiliation 2.1. Cognate words, phonetic reconstruction – greatest obstacle: few written sources outside Chinese and Tibetan + non-phonetic Chinese script OLD CHINESE WRITTEN TIBETAN WRITTEN BURMESE MEANING *ngag 我 nga Na 'I' *s´m 三 gsum su^m 'three' *ngag 五 lnga Na^ 'five' *mj´k 目 mig mjak 'eye' *ngjag 鱼 nya Na^ 'fish' *khwin 犬 khyi khwe 'dog' *srat 杀 bsat sat 'kill' *sjin 薪 shing sac '(fire)wood' *mjing 名 ming ´-man) ’name’ *khag 苦 kha kha^ ’bitter’ 2.2. Typological similarities – but see the Indosphere ~ Sinosphere cut (above) – basic word order? TB: SOV, Sinitic: SVO – classifers? – looks like an areal feature (Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese: yes, many TB lgs: no) – reduplication? – not widespread in the Indosphere 3. Various views on the internal structure of the family 3.1. The ‘standard’ view (Benedict … Matisoff) IntroChinLing ST/ 2 Bartos Sino-Tibetan
    [Show full text]
  • The Plural Forms of Personal Pronouns in Modern Chinese Baoying Qiu University of Massachusetts Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2013 The plural forms of personal pronouns in Modern Chinese Baoying Qiu University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Part of the Chinese Studies Commons Qiu, Baoying, "The lurp al forms of personal pronouns in Modern Chinese" (2013). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1150. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1150 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PLURAL FORMS OF PERSONAL PRONOUNS IN MODERN CHINESE A Dissertation Presented By BAOYING QIU Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS September 2013 Department of Languages, Literatures & Cultures Asian Languages & Literatures © Copyright by Baoying Qiu 2013 All Rights Reserved The Plural Forms of Personal Pronouns in Modern Chinese A Dissertation Presented By BAOYING QIU Approved as to style and content by: _________________________________ Zhongwei Shen, Chair __________________________________ David K. Schneider, Member __________________________________ Elena Suet-Ying Chiu, Member _________________________________ Amanda C. Seaman, Director Asian
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics Ping Chen Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521641977 - Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics Ping Chen Index More information Index affix-like morphemes in Chinese, Chen Enquan, 55, 57 96–7, 110 Chen Guofu, 120 Analects, 7, 79, 160–1 Chen Jianmin, 51, 94 annotated national character, see Chen Lifu, 162 zhùyCn guózì Chen Mingyuan, 139 Archaic Chinese, 1 Chen Ping, 127, 208 (ch. 7 n. 5) Atlas, 204 n. 5 Chen Songcen, 30, 42–4, 54 Chen Wangdao, 80–1 bAgKwén, 73, 75 Chen Zhangtai, 45, 199 báihuà, 22, 68–75 Cheng, Robert L., 47, 98, 116, 127 new-style, 76 China Central Television (CCTV), 38, traditional, 69, 76, 93 40, 42, 53, 58 Basic Rules of the Orthography of Chinese characters Chinese in PCnyCn, 197 composite, see hétHzì Bauer, Robert, 116 homophony of, 137–8, 140 bèi, 93–4, 208 (ch. 6 n. 2) number of, 135–6, 157 Beifanghua, 2; see also Mandarin ordering of, 143–5, 200–1 Beijing, dialect of, 10–12, 14, 16, 19, 21, simple, see dútHzì 37–41, 205 n. 1 Chinese Language Ordinance, 32, 62 Beijing Television (BTV), 38, 40 Chinese Press Association, 199 bGiyCn, 10; see also Beijing, dialect of Chinese word processors, 187 bGnzì, 116 Christian, Donna, 89 bidialectalism, 30, 204–5 n. 3 CíhFi, 144 biétH, 150 Classical literary Chinese bilingualism, 50, 52–3, 204–5 n. 3 romanization, see wényán Bolinger, Dwight, 132 luómFzì Book of history, see ShE jCng clerical script, see lìshE Book of odes, see ShC jCng Clyne, Michael, 124 Bradley, David, 49 Coblin, South, 11, 206 (ch. 2 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructures of Language and Chinese Scripts in an Age of Global Information Revolution Ulug Kuzuoglu
    Codes of Modernity: Infrastructures of Language and Chinese Scripts In an Age of Global Information Revolution Ulug Kuzuoglu Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 ©2018 Ulug Kuzuoglu All rights reserved ABSTRACT Codes of Modernity: Infrastructures of Language and Chinese Scripts in an Age of Global Information Revolution Ulug Kuzuoglu This dissertation explores the global history of Chinese script reforms—the effort to phoneticize Chinese language and/or simplify the writing system—from its inception in the 1890s to its demise in the 1980s. These reforms took place at the intersection of industrialization, colonialism, and new information technologies, such as alphabet-based telegraphy and breakthroughs in printing technologies. As these social and technological transformations put unprecedented pressure on knowledge management and the use of mental and clerical labor, many Chinese intellectuals claimed that learning Chinese characters consumed too much time and mental energy. Chinese script reforms, this dissertation argues, were an effort to increase speed in producing, transmitting, and accessing information, and thus meet the demands of the industrializing knowledge economy. The industrializing knowledge economy that this dissertation explores was built on and sustained by a psychological understanding of the human subject as a knowledge machine, and it was part of a global moment in which the optimization of labor in knowledge production was a key concern for all modernizing economies. While Chinese intellectuals were inventing new signs of inscription, American behavioral psychologists, Soviet psycho-economists, and Central Asian and Ottoman technicians were all experimenting with new scripts in order to increase mental efficiency and productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Practice in Language Studies Contents
    Theory and Practice in Language Studies ISSN 1799-2591 Volume 7, Number 8, August 2017 Contents REGULAR PAPERS Authentic Assessment: Evaluating the Saudi EFL Tertiary Examination System 597 Fahad Saleh Suleiman Alfallaj and Arif Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Al-Ahdal Effect of Environmental Problem-based Learning on the Indonesian EFL Students’ Environment- 608 related Vocabulary Mastery and Writing Ability Dyah Christina Iswandari, Johannes Ananto Prayogo, and Bambang Yudi Cahyono Practical Research on Classroom Strategies in the Grading Teaching Model 617 Liu Peng, Xianjie Deng, and Fang Xie Discourse Analysis of Oliver Twist from the Perspective of Pragmatics 626 Min Lian An Investigation into the Effect of Reader Response Approach on EFL Learners’ Reading 633 Comprehension, Vocabulary Retention and Test Anxiety Nazanin Biglari and Majid Farahian Teachers’ Role in Dealing with Errors in Students’ Second Language Learning 644 Wei Zuo An Analysis of English Translation of Chinese Classics from the Perspective of Cultural 651 Communication Xiu Yu A Contrastive Study of the Use of Politeness Strategies in Disagreement among Characters with 657 Different Power Relations in English and Farsi Novels Farahman Farrokhi and Mina Arghami A Study on Developing Critical Thinking of English Major Students through the Teaching of 670 Comprehensive English Xianxian Wang A Feminist Study of The Summer before the Dark 677 Ningning Hao A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions of Iranian EFL Learners’ Attitudes towards CMC Tools 682 Usefulness Sanam Mehri and Siros Izadpanah The Influence of Foreign Trade Activities on Chinese Loan Words from the Historical Perspective 690 Yiming Zhao and Yeli Shi Research on the Influence of Internet on Extracurricular Learning and Life of English Major College 695 Students Yi Yang and Tianquan Qi Pragmatic Knowledge and Its Reflection in ESP Textbooks: The Case of Unauthentic Textbooks 701 Zohre G.
    [Show full text]
  • Gan, Hakka and the Formation of Chinese Dialects*
    Dialect Variations in Chinese, 129-153 Papers from the Third International Conference on Sinology, Linguistics Section 2002-4-001-002-000034-2 Gan, Hakka and the Formation of Chinese Dialects* Laurent Sagart Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales The author argues that Hakka and southern Gan are sister dialects, as they share several innovations not found elsewhere; that they arose out of the Chinese dialect spoken in central Jiangxi in Song times, a stratified dialect which included a non-Chinese substratum, probably Miao-Yao; an archaic layer; and a more recent layer with an important Late Middle Chinese component. It is claimed that the linguistic boundary between southern Gan and Hakka arose secondarily due to the effect of an old administrative and geographical boundary. It is also argued that Hakka devoicing took place in the south, when Hakka was in contact with the Miao- Yao language She, and that the old dialect of the city of Ganzhou may have played an important role in the formation of Hakka. The relationship of Gan and Hakka is one of the most hotly disputed questions in Chinese dialectology. Two important issues are: (a) do Hakka and Gan subgroup together, or does Hakka subgroup with Yue and Min? and (b) did Hakka and/or Gan arise in the south, or are they northern dialects transplanted into the south? The idea that Hakka is a northern dialect transplanted into the south has its roots in Lo Hsiang-lin’s 1933 book Kejia Yanjiu Daolun. Lo’s intention was to disprove the notion, then prevalent among Cantonese intellectual circles, that the Hakkas were a non-Chinese people.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Off Ice University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Regional Oral History Off ice University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California China Scholars Series Fang-Kuei Li LINGUISTICS EAST AND WEST: AMERICAN INDIAN, SINO-TIBETAN, AND THAI With an Introduction by George Taylor Interviews Conducted by Ning-Ping Chan and Randy LaPolla in 1986 Copyright @ 1988 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a modern research technique involving an interviewee and an informed interviewer in spontaneous conversation. The taped record is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The resulting manuscript is typed in final form, indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley and other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between the University of California and Fang-Kuei Li dated 20 September 1986. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT) ISSN: 2617-0299 (Online); ISSN: 2708-0099 (Print) DOI: 10.32996/Ijllt
    International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT) ISSN: 2617-0299 (Online); ISSN: 2708-0099 (Print) DOI: 10.32996/ijllt www.ijllt.org Original Research Article On Archival Significance of Dialects in Literary Works Hua Jing 1* & Wu Biyu2 1Associate Professor, School of Foreign Languages, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China 2Professor, School of Foreign Languages, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China Corresponding Author: Hua Jing, E-mail: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History Received: May 05, 2020 The study of dialects in literary works has always focus on the literary and Accepted: June 01, 2020 linguistic significance, while the dialects used in literary works can also be of Volume: 3 archival significance in cultural anthropology. From the perspective of archival Issue: 6 science, this paper tries to illustrate the archival significance of dialects in literary DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.6.1 works, and it concludes that dialects in literary works are of archival significance in that they provide evidence and information of social culture, supporting KEYWORDS materials in researches of writers and effective historical materials and data in researches of regional and contemporary culture. This archival function of dialect Literary works, dialects, archival used in literary works is of archival significance to Chinese history, literary history, significance, cultural folklore and anthropological research. anthropology Introduction 1 As an
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 289 5th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2018) The Evolution of Zhizhuangzhang Initial Consonants in Zhiyan Cluster of Jin Dialect* Feng Gao School of Literature Xi'an University Xi'an, China 710065 Abstract—The ancient Zhizhuangzhang initial consonants the modern pronunciation of Zhizhuangzhang Jing group in Zhiyan cluster of Jin dialect belong to Changxu type. The initial consonant in Chinese: concourse type, dichotomy type, modern pronunciation pattern of Zhizhaozhang groups in and trisection type. Zhiyan cluster dialect includes Zhiyan cluster is in line with the dialect of “Zhongyuan Zhierzhuang and Zhisanzhang, belonging to the dichotomy Yinyun”, which was formed at the latest in the Yuan Dynasty. type. Xiong Zhenghui (1990) pointed out that in the northern dialect, there are the Jinan type with integration of Keywords—ancient Zhizhuangzhang; modern pronunciation Zhizhuangzhang and the Nanjing type and Changxu type type; formation time; Zhiyan cluster; Jin dialect with Zhi'erzhuang and Zhisanzhang opposite to each other. [2] The relationship between the word and sound of I. INTRODUCTION Zhizhuangzhang in Zhiyan cluster is the same as that of Zhiyan cluster of Jin dialect is located in Yan'an City, Changxu type, so it belongs to the typical Changxu type. Shaanxi Province, including dialects of six counties: Wuqi, Zhidan, Ansai, Yan'an, Yanchang and Ganquan. [1] Zhiyan III. THE DISTRIBUTION SCOPE OF THE TYPICAL cluster is in the transitional zone between Jin dialect and CHANGXU TYPE official language of central China. It has transitional features The dichotomy type of Zhizhuangzhang is widely in many aspects of the dialect.
    [Show full text]