DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Reconstruct Old Chinese André-Georges Haudricourt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Reconstruct Old Chinese André-Georges Haudricourt How to reconstruct Old Chinese André-Georges Haudricourt To cite this version: André-Georges Haudricourt. How to reconstruct Old Chinese. 2017. halshs-01631479 HAL Id: halshs-01631479 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01631479 Preprint submitted on 9 Nov 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Non-final version (November 9th, 2017). In preparation for: Haudricourt, André-Georges. Evolution of languages and techniques. (Ed.) Martine Mazaudon, Boyd Michailovsky & Alexis Michaud. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 270). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. How to reconstruct Old Chinese (1954) Originally published as: Comment reconstruire le chinois archaïque, Word 10(2/3). 351–364 (1954). Reprinted (with additions) 1 in Problèmes de phonologie diachronique: 161-182. translated by Guillaume Jacques Abstract [The reconstruction of Chinese raises special difficulties due to the nature of the writing system, which only provides indirect evidence concerning pronunciation. The reconstructions proposed by Karlgren and Maspero are revisited systematically. Comparative data from other East Asian languages are adduced, with special attention to early loans from Chinese into Vietnamese and Tai languages, which provide decisive evidence on Old Chinese, i.e. Chinese as it was spoken before the Tang dynasty. The paper argues against reconstructing a contrast between two series of voiced stops (plain vs. aspirated) in Old Chinese. It provides evidence for the reconstruction of a labiovelar series in Old Chinese, and, taking as a model the development of tonal oppositions from syllable finals in Vietnamese, proposes to reconstruct an Old Chinese derivational suffix *s to account for a series of tonal alternations in Middle Chinese.] [1. Introduction] [1.1 Historical linguistics in East Asian and European languages] The linguistic history of Chinese bears some analogy to that of Romance: Mandarin, Cantonese, Wu (from the lower reaches of the Yangtze River) and Min (from Fujian) correspond to the Romance languages; Classical Chinese, the written language of Korea, Japan and Vietnam, played the 1. [The 1972 reprint includes handwritten Chinese characters for all examples in the text (except in §1.2). These had been omitted in the original publication.] 2 André-Georges Haudricourt same role as Medieval Latin, the written language of Germanic, Hungarian and West Slavic countries; early loanwords from Chinese into Miao [Hmong], Thai, Vietnamese and Khmer correspond to the ancient Latin loanwords in Germanic, Albanian, Basque and Berber.2 There are nonetheless two important differences. First, Latin, an inflectional language, can be classified in a straightforward way as a member of the Indo-European family, to which Germanic, Slavic and Albanian also belong but Basque and Berber do not. But Chinese, a language with invariable words [i.e. lacking inflectional morphology], is more difficult to classify: it belongs to the Tibeto-Burman group, but is it as close to the Tai languages3 as people have long believed? In this type of language, relatedness can only be assessed on the basis of vocabulary, and the number of Chinese loanwords has often been underestimated. 4 In addition, the concept of “mixed languages” was accepted: when language C had vocabulary in common both with language A and with language B, it was said that language C originated in a mixture of a dialect of A and a dialect of B.5 It seems now that the best hypothesis is that the languages A, B, and C all belong to the same language family. In East Asia, languages would all be linked in a chain as one large family, Tibeto-Burman and Chinese being related to Miao [Hmong] and Austroasiatic, these two to Tai, and the latter to Malayo-Polynesian. The second difference lies in the writing system: Latin is written alphabetically, and its spelling encapsulates phonetic information that was passed down unchanged through the ages, while the early loanwords from 2. The best recent overview on this subject is Forrest (1948). 3. [In the translation, the national language of Thailand is referred to as “Thai”, and the name “Tai” refers to what Haudricourt called “Common Thai”, or “Thai proper” (Haudricourt 1956, 1970, in this volume), a group comprising Thai, Lao, Shan, etc., but excluding the Zhuang (a.k.a. Dioi) group of languages. It is a lower level group than what comes to mind nowadays when using the terms Tai or Proto-Tai.] 4. [Haudricourt here questions the view that Tai and Chinese constitute a sub- family within Tibeto-Burman (or “Sino-Tibetan”) (Maspero 1920:22n1). Haudricourt’s proposed chain of relations (next paragraph) excludes Tai from Tibeto-Burman entirely, following Benedict (1942); this view has gained widespread acceptance, although the Tai-Chinese genetic relationship is still defended by some linguists, especially in China (Luo 2008).] 5. A case in point is H. Maspero’s statement (1912: 117) that “Proto-Vietnamese was born from the fusion of a Mon-Khmer dialect, a Tai dialect, and maybe even a third, yet unknown, language.” How to reconstruct Old Chinese (1954) 3 Latin followed the considerable phonetic evolution of the languages of Europe. These early loanwords are therefore quite eroded in comparison to recent loanwords that retain the Latin graphic form. Chinese, on the other hand, is written ideographically, and hence defenceless against phonetic evolution. The official language as it was spoken varied from century to century, either abruptly – as when the location of the capital city changed and a different dialect came to be looked up to as the standard – or gradually, following the phonetic evolution of the language. In fact, since the capital city was located in the North, in an area which was subjected to invasions by Turks, Mongols, Tungus and Manchus, who founded dynasties and became assimilated after a period of bilingualism, the language of the capital city evolved much more rapidly than the languages of Southern China and Southeast Asia. The vulgar pronunciation of Chinese words from the oldest layers of borrowings preserves the original pronunciation better than the more recent learned borrowings as represented by the official readings of the ideographic characters. Analogous cases are exceptional in Europe, e.g. in German, where the word Kaiser [ˈkʰaɪzɐ] ‘emperor’, an early borrowing from Latin Caesar, preserves the ancient pronunciation better than the proper name Cäsar [ˈtsɛzɐ, a later, learned borrowing of the same word]. [1.2 Resources for the reconstruction of Chinese] For the reconstruction of the pronunciation of earlier stages of Chinese, we first have at our disposal the tools of comparative linguistics: comparing Chinese dialects with one another, using early Chinese loanwords into other languages, and assessing to what extent the reconstructions are in keeping with the facts observed in neighbouring languages that are genealogically related to Chinese. [Another resource is the analysis of the writing system.] Most characters are phonograms, which is to say that they work as rebuses. For instance, the ideogram for the word pa 巴6 bā ‘boa’ is used as a phonetic component in the characters 把 ba ̌ ‘to grasp’, 靶 ba ̌ ‘target’, 耙 bà ‘harrow’, 疤 bā ‘scar’, etc. However, this writing system goes back to nearly two thousand BC, and some words whose pronunciation used to be similar at that period are now very different. If we could distinguish with confidence between 6. [See the Appendix for a summary of Pinyin and other transcriptions used in the translation.] 4 André-Georges Haudricourt phonogram and ideogram, this would provide valuable clues concerning the original pronunciation. Unfortunately, this is not the case. For instance, the character 肥 féi ‘fat’ contains the ideogram for ‘boa’; it is difficult to know whether this indicates the idea of fatness that this kind of snake evokes, the pronunciation of a word beginning by a bilabial followed by an open vowel, or both. It is apparently only in the third century AD that people started to compare the pronunciation of characters by means of the method known as fanqiè̌ ( 反切): the pronunciation of a character is indicated by two others, the first having the same initial consonant as the target character, and the second the same rhyme. For example, the pronunciation of ‘boa’, pa, is represented by characters pronounced pak̆ and ka. 7 Basing themselves on fanqiè̌ , on Japanese and Vietnamese readings of Chinese characters,8 and especially on a rhyme dictionary, compiled in 601, but which until recently was known only in a 1008 edition, 9 Henri Maspero and Bernhard Karlgren attempted to reconstruct the pronunciation of Middle Chinese, the language of the Tang period [7th to 9th centuries].10 Maspero and Karlgren were not in agreement on everything, but Karlgren’s reconstruction is the more advanced and the more systematic of the two, and it is the one which has been adopted by a majority of sinologists.11 Moreover, going backwards in time from this Middle Chinese reconstruction and using the phonograms and the rhymes in the Book of Odes [11th–8th centuries BC], Karlgren also 7. [The fanqiè̌ formula for this character is 巴伯加切 |boa uncle add cut|, which translates as: “‘boa’ cuts up into ‘uncle’ and ‘add’”, i.e. “its pronunciation is composed of the initial of ‘uncle’ and the rhyme of ‘add’”.] 8. [Local systems of pronouncing Chinese characters became established in medieval times in neighboring countries which adopted Chinese writing; these readings, called Sino-Japanese, Sino-Vietnamese, etc., evolved independently of the pronunciations in Chinese, and are used in reconstructing older Chinese pronunciation.] 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Look at Linguistic Readers
    Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts Volume 10 Issue 3 April 1970 Article 5 4-1-1970 A Look At Linguistic Readers Nicholas P. Criscuolo New Haven, Connecticut Public Schools Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Criscuolo, N. P. (1970). A Look At Linguistic Readers. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 10 (3). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol10/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Education and Literacy Studies at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact wmu- [email protected]. A LOOK AT LINGUISTIC READERS Nicholas P. Criscuolo NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, PUBLIC SCHOOLS Linguistics, as it relates to reading, has generated much interest lately among educators. Although linguistics is not a new science, its recent focus has captured the interest of the reading specialist because both the specialist and the linguist are concerned with language. This surge of interest in linguistics becomes evident when one sees that a total of forty-four articles on linguistics are listed in the Education Index for July, 1965 to June, 1966. The number of articles on linguistics written for educational journals has been increasing ever SInce. This interest has been sharpened to some degree by the publi­ cation of Chall's book Learning to Read: The Great Debate (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Learning About Phonology and Orthography
    EFFECTIVE LITERACY PRACTICES MODULE REFERENCE GUIDE Learning About Phonology and Orthography Module Focus Learning about the relationships between the letters of written language and the sounds of spoken language (often referred to as letter-sound associations, graphophonics, sound- symbol relationships) Definitions phonology: study of speech sounds in a language orthography: study of the system of written language (spelling) continuous text: a complete text or substantive part of a complete text What Children Children need to learn to work out how their spoken language relates to messages in print. Have to Learn They need to learn (Clay, 2002, 2006, p. 112) • to hear sounds buried in words • to visually discriminate the symbols we use in print • to link single symbols and clusters of symbols with the sounds they represent • that there are many exceptions and alternatives in our English system of putting sounds into print Children also begin to work on relationships among things they already know, often long before the teacher attends to those relationships. For example, children discover that • it is more efficient to work with larger chunks • sometimes it is more efficient to work with relationships (like some word or word part I know) • often it is more efficient to use a vague sense of a rule How Children Writing Learn About • Building a known writing vocabulary Phonology and • Analyzing words by hearing and recording sounds in words Orthography • Using known words and word parts to solve new unknown words • Noticing and learning about exceptions in English orthography Reading • Building a known reading vocabulary • Using known words and word parts to get to unknown words • Taking words apart while reading Manipulating Words and Word Parts • Using magnetic letters to manipulate and explore words and word parts Key Points Through reading and writing continuous text, children learn about sound-symbol relation- for Teachers ships, they take on known reading and writing vocabularies, and they can use what they know about words to generate new learning.
    [Show full text]
  • De Sousa Sinitic MSEA
    THE FAR SOUTHERN SINITIC LANGUAGES AS PART OF MAINLAND SOUTHEAST ASIA (DRAFT: for MPI MSEA workshop. 21st November 2012 version.) Hilário de Sousa ERC project SINOTYPE — École des hautes études en sciences sociales [email protected]; [email protected] Within the Mainland Southeast Asian (MSEA) linguistic area (e.g. Matisoff 2003; Bisang 2006; Enfield 2005, 2011), some languages are said to be in the core of the language area, while others are said to be periphery. In the core are Mon-Khmer languages like Vietnamese and Khmer, and Kra-Dai languages like Lao and Thai. The core languages generally have: – Lexical tonal and/or phonational contrasts (except that most Khmer dialects lost their phonational contrasts; languages which are primarily tonal often have five or more tonemes); – Analytic morphological profile with many sesquisyllabic or monosyllabic words; – Strong left-headedness, including prepositions and SVO word order. The Sino-Tibetan languages, like Burmese and Mandarin, are said to be periphery to the MSEA linguistic area. The periphery languages have fewer traits that are typical to MSEA. For instance, Burmese is SOV and right-headed in general, but it has some left-headed traits like post-nominal adjectives (‘stative verbs’) and numerals. Mandarin is SVO and has prepositions, but it is otherwise strongly right-headed. These two languages also have fewer lexical tones. This paper aims at discussing some of the phonological and word order typological traits amongst the Sinitic languages, and comparing them with the MSEA typological canon. While none of the Sinitic languages could be considered to be in the core of the MSEA language area, the Far Southern Sinitic languages, namely Yuè, Pínghuà, the Sinitic dialects of Hǎinán and Léizhōu, and perhaps also Hakka in Guǎngdōng (largely corresponding to Chappell (2012, in press)’s ‘Southern Zone’) are less ‘fringe’ than the other Sinitic languages from the point of view of the MSEA linguistic area.
    [Show full text]
  • Glottal Stop Initials and Nasalization in Sino-Vietnamese and Southern Chinese
    Glottal Stop Initials and Nasalization in Sino-Vietnamese and Southern Chinese Grainger Lanneau A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Washington 2020 Committee: Zev Handel William Boltz Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Asian Languages and Literature ©Copyright 2020 Grainger Lanneau University of Washington Abstract Glottal Stop Initials and Nasalization in Sino-Vietnamese and Southern Chinese Grainger Lanneau Chair of Supervisory Committee: Professor Zev Handel Asian Languages and Literature Middle Chinese glottal stop Ying [ʔ-] initials usually develop into zero initials with rare occasions of nasalization in modern day Sinitic1 languages and Sino-Vietnamese. Scholars such as Edwin Pullyblank (1984) and Jiang Jialu (2011) have briefly mentioned this development but have not yet thoroughly investigated it. There are approximately 26 Sino-Vietnamese words2 with Ying- initials that nasalize. Scholars such as John Phan (2013: 2016) and Hilario deSousa (2016) argue that Sino-Vietnamese in part comes from a spoken interaction between Việt-Mường and Chinese speakers in Annam speaking a variety of Chinese called Annamese Middle Chinese AMC, part of a larger dialect continuum called Southwestern Middle Chinese SMC. Phan and deSousa also claim that SMC developed into dialects spoken 1 I will use the terms “Sinitic” and “Chinese” interchangeably to refer to languages and speakers of the Sinitic branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family. 2 For the sake of simplicity, I shall refer to free and bound morphemes alike as “words.” 1 in Southwestern China today (Phan, Desousa: 2016). Using data of dialects mentioned by Phan and deSousa in their hypothesis, this study investigates initial nasalization in Ying-initial words in Southwestern Chinese Languages and in the 26 Sino-Vietnamese words.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Chinese Phonology Guillaume Jacques Chinese Historical Phonology Differs from Most Domains of Contemporary Linguisti
    Traditional Chinese Phonology Guillaume Jacques Chinese historical phonology differs from most domains of contemporary linguistics in that its general framework is based in large part on a genuinely native tradition. The non-Western outlook of the terminology and concepts used in Chinese historical phonology make this field extremely difficult to understand for both experts in other fields of Chinese linguistics and historical phonologists specializing in other language families. The framework of Chinese phonology derives from the tradition of rhyme books and rhyme tables, which dates back to the medieval period (see section 1 and 2, as well as the corresponding entries). It is generally accepted that these sources were not originally intended as linguistic descriptions of the spoken language; their main purpose was to provide standard character readings for literary Chinese (see subsection 2.4). Nevertheless, these documents also provide a full-fledged terminology describing both syllable structure (initial consonant, rhyme, tone) and several phonological features (places of articulation of consonants and various features that are not always trivial to interpret, see section 2) of the Chinese language of their time (on the problematic concept of “Middle Chinese”, see the corresponding entry). The terminology used in this field is by no means a historical curiosity only relevant to the history of linguistics. It is still widely used in contemporary Chinese phonology, both in works concerning the reconstruction of medieval Chinese and in the description of dialects (see for instance Ma and Zhang 2004). In this framework, the phonological information contained in the medieval documents is used to reconstruct the pronunciation of earlier stages of Chinese, and the abstract categories of the rhyme tables (such as the vexing děng 等 ‘division’ category) receive various phonetic interpretations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandarin Chinese: an Annotated Bibliography of Self-Study Materials Duncan E
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Law School 2007 Mandarin Chinese: An Annotated Bibliography of Self-Study Materials Duncan E. Alford University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/law_facpub Part of the Legal Profession Commons, Legal Writing and Research Commons, and the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Duncan E. Alford, Mandarin Chinese: An Annotated Bibliography of Self-Study Materials, 35 Int'l J. Legal Info. 537 (2007) This Article is brought to you by the Law School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mandarin Chinese: An Annotated Bibliography of Self- Study Materials DUNCAN E. ALFORD The People's Republic of China is currently the seventh largest economy in the world and is projected to be the largest economy by 2050. Commensurate with its growing economic power, the PRC is using its political power more frequently on the world stage. As a result of these changes, interest in China and its legal system is growing among attorneys and academics. International law librarians similarly are seeing more researchers interested in China, its laws and economy. The principal language of China, Mandarin Chinese, is considered a difficult language to learn. The Foreign Service Institute has rated Mandarin as "exceptionally difficult for English speakers to learn." Busy professionals such as law librarians find it very difficult to learn additional languages despite their usefulness in their careers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Borrowing in Contemporary Spoken Japanese
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 1996 Integration of the American English lexicon: A study of borrowing in contemporary spoken Japanese Bradford Michael Frischkorn Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the First and Second Language Acquisition Commons Recommended Citation Frischkorn, Bradford Michael, "Integration of the American English lexicon: A study of borrowing in contemporary spoken Japanese" (1996). Theses Digitization Project. 1107. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1107 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTEGRATION OF THE AMERICAN ENGLISH LEXICON: A STUDY OF BORROWING IN CONTEMPORARY SPOKEN JAPANESE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfilliiient of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in English Composition by Bradford Michael Frischkorn March 1996 INTEGRATION OF THE AMERICAN ENGLISH LEXICON: A STUDY OF BORROWING IN CONTEMPORARY SPOKEN JAPANESE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University,,, San Bernardino , by Y Bradford Michael Frischkorn ' March 1996 Approved by: Dr. Wendy Smith, Chair, English " Date Dr. Rong Chen ~ Dr. Sunny Hyonf ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis was to determine some of the behavioral characteristics of English loanwords in Japanese (ELJ) as they are used by native speakers in news telecasts. Specifically, I sought to examine ELJ from four perspectives: 1) part of speech, 2) morphology, 3) semantics, and 4) usage domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on the Time When Ping Split Into Yin and Yang in Chinese Northern Dialect
    Chinese Studies 2014. Vol.3, No.1, 19-23 Published Online February 2014 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/chnstd) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/chnstd.2014.31005 Research on the Time When Ping Split into Yin and Yang in Chinese Northern Dialect Ma Chuandong1*, Tan Lunhua2 1College of Fundamental Education, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China 2Sichuan Science and Technology University for Employees, Chengdu, China Email: *[email protected] Received January 7th, 2014; revised February 8th, 2014; accepted February 18th, 2014 Copyright © 2014 Ma Chuandong, Tan Lunhua. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In accordance of the Creative Commons Attribution License all Copyrights © 2014 are reserved for SCIRP and the owner of the intellectual property Ma Chuandong, Tan Lun- hua. All Copyright © 2014 are guarded by law and by SCIRP as a guardian. The phonetic phenomenon “ping split into yin and yang” 平分阴阳 is one of the most important changes of Chinese tones in the early modern Chinese, which is reflected clearly in Zhongyuan Yinyun 中原音韵 by Zhou Deqing 周德清 (1277-1356) in the Yuan Dynasty. The authors of this paper think the phe- nomenon “ping split into yin and yang” should not have occurred so late as in the Yuan Dynasty, based on previous research results and modern Chinese dialects, making use of historical comparative method and rhyming books. The changes of tones have close relationship with the voiced and voiceless initials in Chinese, and the voiced initials have turned into voiceless in Song Dynasty, so it could not be in the Yuan Dynasty that ping split into yin and yang, but no later than the Song Dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • S Suffixes in Old Chinese?
    How many *-s suffixes in Old Chinese? Guillaume Jacques To cite this version: Guillaume Jacques. How many *-s suffixes in Old Chinese? . Bulletin of Chinese linguistics, Brill, 2016, 9 (2), pp.205-217. 10.1163/2405478X-00902014. halshs-01566036 HAL Id: halshs-01566036 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01566036 Submitted on 20 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. How many *-s suffixes in Old Chinese?* Guillaume Jacques July 20, 2017 1 Introduction While qusheng 去聲 derivation is one of the most prominent trace of mor- phology in Old Chinese, it is probably also the least understood one, as it presents diverse and even contradictory functions, to the extent that Downer (1959, 262), in his seminal article, argued that it was simply a way of creat- ing new words, not a derivation with a well-defined grammatical function.1 Yet, we know thanks to the work of scholars such as Haudricourt (1954), Forrest (1960); Schuessler (1985) and Sagart (1999) that qusheng derivation comes (at least in part) from *-s suffixes. As -s suffixes with functions similar to those that have been reconstructed for Old Chinese are attested and even are still productive in more conservative languages of the Trans-Himalayan family, it is worthwhile to explore the exact opposite hypothesis to Downer’s ultrascepticism, namely that the vast array of functions of the *-s is due to the merger of many independent dental suffixes, and constitute indeed obscured traces of a former inflectional system.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-European Linguistics: an Introduction Indo-European Linguistics an Introduction
    This page intentionally left blank Indo-European Linguistics The Indo-European language family comprises several hun- dred languages and dialects, including most of those spoken in Europe, and south, south-west and central Asia. Spoken by an estimated 3 billion people, it has the largest number of native speakers in the world today. This textbook provides an accessible introduction to the study of the Indo-European proto-language. It clearly sets out the methods for relating the languages to one another, presents an engaging discussion of the current debates and controversies concerning their clas- sification, and offers sample problems and suggestions for how to solve them. Complete with a comprehensive glossary, almost 100 tables in which language data and examples are clearly laid out, suggestions for further reading, discussion points and a range of exercises, this text will be an essential toolkit for all those studying historical linguistics, language typology and the Indo-European proto-language for the first time. james clackson is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge, and is Fellow and Direc- tor of Studies, Jesus College, University of Cambridge. His previous books include The Linguistic Relationship between Armenian and Greek (1994) and Indo-European Word For- mation (co-edited with Birgit Anette Olson, 2004). CAMBRIDGE TEXTBOOKS IN LINGUISTICS General editors: p. austin, j. bresnan, b. comrie, s. crain, w. dressler, c. ewen, r. lass, d. lightfoot, k. rice, i. roberts, s. romaine, n. v. smith Indo-European Linguistics An Introduction In this series: j. allwood, l.-g. anderson and o.¨ dahl Logic in Linguistics d.
    [Show full text]
  • Taoism and Chinese Religion
    www.quirinpress.com @QuirinPress Quirin Press Release “It is largely thanks to [Maspero’s] pioneer work in the fields of Chinese religion, anthropology, linguistics and history that China’s contribution to the achievement of man could first be reviewed on terms of parity with those of other civilizations. “To the question whether his discoveries, opinions and interpretations have been outdated by the subsequent thirty years’ research, it may be answered that leading scholars still rely with the utmost confidence on his writings as a framework whose validity has outdated their most recent findings, and whose detail has in many cases not been bettered.” — Michael Loewe, University of Cambridge (from the sleeve notes to the original 1981 edition.) Taoism and Chinese Religion Revised Edition by Henri Maspero Translated by Frank A. Kierman, Jr. Price for pb & E-book: $ 96.56 USD | €74.00 EUR | £ 58.40 GBP | $ 99.99 AUD Publication date: Sep. 2014 Paperback (Sep. 2015 E-book) Size: xli + 689 pages | 6 x 9 in. / 234 x 156 mm. | 2.339 lb / 1060 gm Formats available: Perfect Bound (pb) & E-book Series: Quirin Pinyin Updated Editions (QPUE) ISBN 13: 978-1-922169-04-4 Paper | 978-1-922169-05-1 E-book (Sep 2015) … one of the greatest attractions of Maspero’s writings in this volume (and one that will endure even when our own researches eventually make us better informed than he was on every topic upon which he touched), is the invaluable picture disclosed to us of a mature sinologist remarkable for his broad erudition and penetrating insight confronting a field of research completely untouched by earlier scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Abbreviations
    256 Journal Abbreviations AM: Asia Major AP: Asian Philosophy AS: Asiatische Studien / Études Asiatiques BIHP: Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology (Academia Sinica) BMFEA: Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities BSOAS: Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies EC: Early China HJAS: Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies JAAR: Journal of the American Academy of Religion JAOS: Journal of the American Oriental Society JAS: Journal of Asian Studies JBL: Journal of Biblical Literature JCP: Journal of Chinese Philosophy JCR: Journal of Chinese Religions JEAA: Journal of East Asian Archaeology JTS: Journal of Theological Studies MS: Monumenta Serica NT: Novum Testamentum NTS: New Testament Studies OE: Oriens Extremus PEW: Philosophy East and West TP: T’oung Pao WSP: Warring States Papers Frequently Cited Monographs and Series William H Baxter. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Mouton 1992 BD:MichaelLoewe.ABiographicalDictionaryoftheQin...Brill2000 BDAG: Frederick William Danker. A Greek-English Lexicon...1957; 3ed Chicago 2000 E Bruce Brooks and A Taeko Brooks. The Original Analects. Columbia 1998 CHAC: Michael Loewe et al (ed). Cambridge History of Early China. Cambridge 1999 Chye!nMu". !!!! . !!!!!!!!!!!!!! . 2ed Hong Kong 1956 ECT: Michael Loewe (ed). Early Chinese Texts. SSEC 1993 GSB: Gu#-shr# Bye"n !!!!!! 1926-1941 GSR: Bernhard Karlgren. Grammata Serica Recensa. BMFEA v29 (1957) 1-332 HK: [The Chinese University of Hong Kong ICS concordances] HY: [The Harvard-Yenching concordances] Bernhard Karlgren. [The appropriate gloss or translation in BMFEA] James Legge. [The appropriate volume of James Legge’s Chinese Classics or SBE series] Jv"ng Lya!ng-shu" !!!!!!. !!!!!!!!!!.3v!!!!1984 Ma# Gwo!-ha"n !!!!!!.
    [Show full text]