DOCSLIB.ORG

GMT Global Report Global Light Rail Report 2017 F1.Qxp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GLOBAL LIGHT RAIL PROJECTS REPORT 2017 Global Mass Transit Research has released the third edition of the Global Each project profile provides information on: Light Rail Projects Report 2017 – the most comprehensive and up-to-date Background study on the sector. Key players The report comprises two distinct sections. Network Ridership Part 1 (42 slides) of the report describes the existing state of, and the Rolling stock and technology expected opportunities in, the global light rail industry in terms of network, Fare system ridership, rolling stock and technology, as well as fare systems. It examines Extensions/Capital projects recent technical and financing developments; analyses key growth drivers Recent developments and contracts awarded and challenges; and assesses the future outlook for the industry. Project contacts Part 2 (555 slides) of the report provides updated information on the world's The report will be useful to organisations interested in the global light rail top 109 light-rail projects that present significant capital investment industry – government agencies, transport authorities, operators, service opportunities. The report covers 43 countries organised into five regions: and technology providers, equipment manufacturers and suppliers, EPC North America, Latin America, Asia, Europe, and Middle East & Africa. contractors, investors/lenders, research organisations, industry consultants, The report presents information on existing network, stations, ridership, regulatory agencies, development institutions, etc. rolling stock, technology and fare systems. It highlights upcoming capital The report is available in the PowerPoint Presentation format and also investment needs and opportunities such as extensions and upgrades of includes an MS Excel file with information in database format. It is priced at existing lines and stations; development of new lines and stations; rolling USD4,000. stock procurement and refurbishment; power and communications technology upgrades; as well as fare system developments. As special offer for Public Transport Authorities/Agencies the report is priced at USD 3,500. Published by Global Mass Transit B-17, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi 110016, India Mobile: +1 905 228 6419, Email: [email protected] Website: www.globalmasstransit.net Table of Contents PART 1: EXISTING AND EVOLVING GLOBAL LIGHT RAIL INDUSTRY 2.2.2 Brazil 2.2.2.1 Goiânia Light Rail (VLT) 200 1.1 Global light rail industry 10 2.2.2.2 Natal Light Rail (VLT) 203 1.1.1 Overview 11 2.2.2.3 Santos Light Rail (VLT) 207 1.1.2 Network and ridership 12 1.1.3 Rolling stock and technology 19 2.2.2.4 São Paulo's Monorail 212 1.1.4 Fare systems 23 1.1.5 Funding and finance 25 2.2.3 Chile 1.1.6 Recent contracts awarded 30 2.2.3.1 Las Condes Light Rail 218 1.1.7 Key trends and developments 38 2.2.4 Colombia 1.2 Opportunities and outlook 39 1.2.1 Key growth drivers 40 2.2.4.1 BogotaRegioTram 222 1.2.2 Network expansion 41 1.2.3 Launch of new systems 43 2.2.5 Mexico 1.2.4 Rolling stock procurement and technology innovation 44 2.2.5.1 Guadalajara Light Rail 225 1.2.5 Fare system development 45 1.2.6 Open tenders with contracts to be awarded 49 2.2.6 Peru 1.2.7 Key issues and challenges 50 1.2.8 Outlook 51 2.2.6.1 ArequipaLight Rail 232 PART 2: PROJECT PROFILES 2.3 AsiaPacific 235 2.3.1 Australia 2.1 North America 54 2.3.1.1 Canberra Capital Metro 236 2.1.1 Canada 2.3.1.2 Gold Coast Light Rail 243 2.1.1.1 Calgary CTrain 55 2.1.1.2 Edmonton Light Rail 61 2.3.1.3 Newcastle Light Rail 251 2.1.1.3 Hamilton Light Rail 69 2.3.1.4 Parramatta Light Rail Transit 258 2.1.1.4 Hurontario-Main Light Rail 73 2.3.1.5 Sydney Light Rail 263 2.1.1.5 Ottawa O-Train 77 2.1.1.6 Surrey Light Rail 84 2.3.2 China 2.1.1.7 Toronto Light Rail 88 2.3.2.1 Changchun Light Rail Transit 269 2.1.1.8 Waterloo-Kitchener Light Rail 93 2.3.2.2 Macau Light Rapid Transit 275 2.1.2 United States 2.3.2.3 Songjiang Tram 281 2.1.2.1 Baltimore Light Rail 98 2.3.2.4 Suzhou Tram 285 2.1.2.2 Boston Green Line and Trolley 104 2.3.2.5 Zhuhai Tram 289 2.1.2.3 Broward Transit Streetcar 112 2.1.2.4 Charlotte Lynx Rapid Transit 116 2.3.3 India 2.1.2.5 Denver Light Rail 122 2.1.2.6 Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit 128 2.3.3.1 Kozhikode Light Metro 293 2.1.2.7 Fort Lauderdale Wave Streetcar 132 2.3.3.2 Mumbai Monorail 297 2.1.2.8 Los Angeles Metro Rail 136 2.3.3.3 Thiruvananthapuram Light Metro 302 2.1.2.9 Milwaukee Streetcar 144 2.1.2.10 Minneapolis Light Rail 148 2.3.4 Indonesia 2.1.2.11 Oklahoma City Streetcar 154 2.3.4.1 Jakarta Light Rail Transit 306 2.1.2.12 Phoenix Metro Light Rail 158 2.1.2.13 Sacramento Light Rail and Streetcar 164 2.3.4.2 Palembang Light Rail Transit 311 2.1.2.14 San Diego Trolley 169 2.1.2.15 San Francisco Muni Metro 175 2.3.5 Kazakhstan 2.1.2.16 Santa Ana and Garden Grove Streetcar 181 2.3.5.1 Almaty Light Rail Transit 316 2.1.2.17 Seattle Link Light Rail 185 2.3.5.2 Astana Light Rail Transit 320 2.1.2.18 Tempe Streetcar 192 2.3.5.3 Pavlodar Tram 323 2.2 Latin America 196 2.2.1 Bolivia 2.3.6 Malaysia 2.2.1.1 Cochabamba LRT 197 2.3.6.1 Kuala Lumpur Rapid Transit (RapidKL) 328 www.globalmasstransit.net Table of Contents 2.3.7 Philippines 2.4.12 Portugal 2.3.7.1 Manila Light Rail 335 2.4.12.1 Porto Light Rail 470 2.3.8 SouthKorea 2.4.13 Russia 2.3.8.1 Seoul Light Rail 344 2.4.13.1 Moscow Tramway 475 2.4.13.2 Saint Petersburg Tram 482 2.3.9 Taiwan 2.3.9.1 Ankeng Light Rail 347 2.4.14 Spain 2.3.9.2 Danhai Light Rail 349 2.4.14.1 Barcelona Tram 489 2.3.9.3 Kaohsiung Circular Rail Line 354 2.4.14.2 Euskotren Tranbia 497 2.4.14.3 Murcia Tramway 504 2.3.10 Thailand 2.4.14.4 Zaragoza Tramway 508 2.3.10.1 Bangkok Sky Train and Monorail 358 2.3.10.2 Phuket Light Rail 364 2.4.15 Switzerland 2.4.15.1 Geneva Tramway (Réseau tramway de Genève) 514 2.3.11 Vietnam 2.4.15.2 Zurich Tram 520 2.3.11.1 Hanoi Light-Metro and Monorail 367 2.4.16 Turkey 2.4 Europe 373 2.4.16.1 Bursarayand Burtram 526 2.4.1 Belgium 2.4.16.2 Izmir Tram, Light-Metro and Monorail 531 2.4.1.1 Antwerp Tramway 374 2.4.16.3 Izmit Akçaray 536 2.4.1.2 Liège Tramway 379 2.4.17 United Kingdom 2.4.2 Denmark 2.4.17.1 Birmingham Midland Metro 540 2.4.2.1 Copenhagen Ring 3 Light Rail 382 2.4.17.2 Manchester Metrolink 546 2.4.2.2 Odense Letbane 386 2.5 Middle East and Africa 552 2.4.3 Finland 2.5.1 Algeria 2.4.3.1 Helsinki Tram 390 2.5.1.1 Constantine Tramway 553 2.4.3.2 Tampere Light Rail 396 2.5.1.2 Mostaganem Tramway 557 2.5.1.3 Sétif Tramway 561 2.4.4 France 2.4.4.1 Avignon Tramway 400 2.5.2 Egypt 2.4.4.2 Bordeaux Tramway 403 2.5.2.1 Cairo Monorail 565 2.4.4.3 Caen Light Rail 407 2.4.4.4 Lyon Tramway 410 2.5.3 Israel 2.4.4.5 Nantes Tramway 415 2.5.3.1 Haifa -Nazareth LRT 568 2.4.4.6 Nice Tramway 421 2.5.3.2 Jerusalem Light Rail 570 2.4.4.7 Paris Tramway 427 2.5.3.3 Tel Aviv Light Rail 575 2.4.5 Germany 2.5.4 Morocco 2.4.5.1 Ulm Tramway 436 2.5.4.1 Casablanca Tram 580 2.5.4.2 Rabat-Salé Tramway 586 2.4.6 Ireland 2.4.6.1 Luas Light Rail 440 2.5.5 Nigeria 2.5.5.1 Abuja Light Rail 591 2.4.7 Italy 2.5.5.2 Lagos Light Rail 595 2.4.7.1 Firenze Tram (Tramvia) 446 2.5.6 Qatar 2.4.8 Luxembourg 2.5.6.1 Lusail Tramway 599 2.4.8.1 Luxtram 451 2.5.7 United Arab Emirates (UAE) 2.4.9 Macedonia 2.5.7.1 Dubai Tram 504 2.4.9.1 SkopjeTram 456 PART3: APPENDIX 2.4.10 Netherlands 2.4.10.1 Utrecht Sneltarm 459 3.1 List of Currency Conversions 610 3.2 Sources and Methodology 611 2.4.11 Norway 2.4.11.1 Bergen Light Rail 463 Sources and Methodology Global Mass Transit Research’s industry analysts have utilised primary and secondary research sources in preparing this report. Primary sources include information obtained through telephone interviews and emails from public transport authorities, operators and regulators.
Recommended publications
  • I Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport

    I Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport

    i Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Adapting Pricing and Infrastructural Innovations using Frugal Approach in Ethiopia and Nigeria iii Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Adapting pricing and infrastructural innovations using frugal approach in Ethiopia and Nigeria Innovatie en aanpassing in stedelijk light-rail vervoer Aanpassing van beprijzing- en infrastructuurinnovaties met behulp van een sobere aanpak in Ethiopië en Nigeria Thesis to obtain the degree of Doctor from the Erasmus University Rotterdam by command of the rector magnificus Prof. dr. R.C.M.E. Engels and in accordance with the decision of the Doctorate Board. The public defence shall be held on Friday May 8, 2020 at 11.30 hrs by Taslim Adebowale Alade born in Kano, Nigeria Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport iv Doctoral Committee: Promoter: Prof. dr. J. Edelenbos Other members: Prof. dr. H. Geerlings Prof. dr. ir. T. Tillema Prof. dr. P. Knorringa Copromoter: Dr. A. Gianoli v Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Dedication I dedicate this PhD dissertation to my late father and mother, Abdulrahman Babatunde Alade and Esther Eyinade Alade; for giving me a solid and deeply rooted foundation in education. Our parent made sure we had all we needed, especially when it comes to our education. They also encouraged us to push the limits and always aim high, no matter the challenges on the way. I love you both. Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport vi Acknowledgments First, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Jesus Christ, our Lord and saviour, for His love, sponsorship of the PhD studies, grace, empowerment, protection, provision, and mercy upon my life and family.
  • Nigeria's Railway System

    Nigeria's Railway System

    NIGERIA’S RAILWAY SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT, DECLINE AND REBIRTH 1 4TH EDITION 2020 MESSAGE FROM EDITOR-IN-CHIEF ........................................................................... 3 DG’S STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 4 FEATURE STORY ............................................................................................................ 6 TRANSPORTATION SECTOR PPP PROJECTS ............................................................ 12 REBALANCING AIRPORT PPPS, EVEN AS THE COVID-19 WINDS STILL BLOW . 16 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................. 19 4TH QUARTER 3PUCF MEETING REPORT ............................................................... 26 OBC/FBC COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATES PRESENTED IN 4TH QUARTER 2020 .... 28 ICRC IN THE NEWS ................................................................................................... 30 WORKSHOPS - TRAININGS - CONFERENCES – SUMMITS – SYMPOSIUMS ...... 35 HOW TO COMBAT ZOOM FATIGUE ...................................................................... 36 FROM THE NIGERIA INSTITUTE OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND PPP ........................ 40 HEALTH & WELLNESS ............................................................................................... 42 ON A LIGHTER NOTE ................................................................................................ 46 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION .....................................................................................
  • Parramatta Light Rail Fact Sheet

    Parramatta Light Rail Fact Sheet

    Fact sheet Enabling Works We’re building the Parramatta Light Rail, one of the NSW Government’s major infrastructure projects to serve a growing Sydney. In early 2019, you will start to notice some changes to Parramatta roads and traffic intersections as we prepare for construction. The Parramatta Light Rail project team will continue to keep you updated before and during the work. LATE 2018 2019 2023 • ENABLING WORKS SITE • MAIN ENABLING WORKS BEGIN • STAGE 1 BEGINS OPERATING INVESTIGATIONS BEGIN • MAJOR CONSTRUCTION BEGINS Enabling Works ‘Enabling Works’ is the term used for construction works such as the relocation of underground utilities, the modification or installation of traffic lights, road widening, the redirection of traffic flows and changes to parking, to modify and improve the capacity of the existing traffic network. The Parramatta Light Rail team will engage with residents and local businesses to communicate changes to property access as a result of the changes. Why is this work being done? Transport for NSW is conducting these works to enable the building and operation of Parramatta Light Rail Stage 1, and to mitigate the impacts of construction. Most of the Parramatta Light Rail Enabling Works What is Parramatta Light Rail? are being undertaken along roads that do not form part of the Parramatta Light Rail route. The works are Stage 1 of Parramatta Light Rail will connect intended to increase road capacity to ensure traffic Westmead to Carlingford, via Parramatta CBD can move in and around the Parramatta area during and Camellia. The route will link Parramatta’s construction and, later, operations of light rail.
  • (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the Selection of Projects

    (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the Selection of Projects

    Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the selection of projects July 2020 Innovation and Networks Executive Agency THE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS IN THIS PUBLICATION ARE AS SUPPLIED BY APPLICANTS IN THE TENTEC PROPOSAL SUBMIS- SION SYSTEM. THE INNOVATION AND NETWORKS EXECUTIVE AGENCY CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ISSUE ARISING FROM SAID DESCRIPTIONS. The Innovation and Networks Executive Agency is not liable for any consequence from the reuse of this publication. Brussels, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA), 2020 © European Union, 2020 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Distorting the original meaning or message of this document is not allowed. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos and other material that is not under the copyright of the European Union, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. PDF ISBN 978-92-9208-086-0 doi:10.2840/16208 EF-02-20-472-EN-N Page 2 / 168 Table of Contents Commonly used abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Les Systèmes De Transport Collectif Structurants

    Les Systèmes De Transport Collectif Structurants

    la CeMathèque d oossier s s i e r tthématique h é m a t i q u e > Les systèmes de transpotransportr t collectif strstructurantsucturants > Définition, rôle et impact d’un sysystèmestème de trtransportansport ccollectifollectif structurstructurantant > CaracCaractéristiquestéristiques d’un sysystèmestème de trtransportansport colleccollectiftif strucstructurantturant > LeLess réponses possibles : différents types de matériel roulant enenvisageablesvisageables > LeLess infrinfrastructuresastructures de déplacdéplacementement > Coût des différents sysystèmes.stèmes. Eléments comparcomparatifsatifs > Domaine de perpertinencetinence de chaque sysystèmestème La CeMathèque_n°26n°26 décembre 2008 > Préambule Divers systèmes de transport collectif, plus ou moins innovants selon les cas, permettent la mise en place d’une desserte très efficiente dans des contextes précis. Ils dynamisent le trans- port en commun, le rendent plus attractif et favorisent un accroissement de sa clientèle, dans des conditions qui le rendent également plus concurrentiel avec la voiture individuelle. Ces systèmes ont la caractéristique d’être structurants, c’est-à-dire qu’ils constituent l’ossature d’un réseau et offrent, à ce titre, une desserte qui rencontre un ensemble d’exigences préci- ses, au moins en termes de régularité, de fréquence et de rapidité. Ils proposent également un niveau de service élevé. Ils structurent aussi l’environnement dans lequel ils s’inscrivent : en termes d’attractivité et de développement des lieux d’activités, d’habitat, … Différentes solutions existent et connaissent un succès croissant. Elles témoignent d’une diver- sification importante des alternatives possibles, qui peuvent être adoptées au sein d’une 8 même ville. Chacune dispose de son domaine de pertinence. Ce qui indique clairement 200 qu’à chaque situation correspond une solution, pas nécessairement parfaite, mais la mieux adaptée parmi ces différentes solutions.
  • Ðə Məʊˈbɪlɪtɪ ˈkʌmpənɪ

    Ðə Məʊˈbɪlɪtɪ ˈkʌmpənɪ

    / ðə məʊˈbɪlɪtɪ ˈkʌmpənɪ / Since 1853. Best known as Transdev. To be the mobility company is very ambitious but also very modest: to bring and build THE solution for clients, only the result counts! The commitment is to be the company that operates the best daily mobility options, in a spirit of open partnership serving communities and people, and with innovation and sustainability in mind at all times. 2 transdev.com THANK YOU TO OUR CONTRIBUTORS. Publication director: Pascale Giet. Photo credits: A. Acosta, W. Beaucardet, CDGVal, Connexxion, O. Desclos, J.-F. Deroubaix, Focke Strangmann, Fotopersbureau HCA/P. Harderwijk, P. Fournier, GettyImages/Westend61, Groupeer, T. Itty, Joel, S. van Leiden, Lizafoto/L. Simonsson, J. Locher, J. Lutt, U. Miethe, J. Minchillo, Mobike, Moovizy Saint-Etienne, Rouen Normandie Autonomous Lab, RyanJLane, Schiphol, T. Schulze, Service photographique The mobility company The mobility de Mulhouse Alsace Agglomération, SkyScans/D. Hancock, A. Oudard Tozzi, Transdev Australasia, Transdev Australia, Transdev et Lohr, Transdev North Holland, Transdev Sweden, Transdev USA, Transport de l’agglomération Nîmoise, Urbis Park, R. Wildenberg. This document is printed on FSC-certifi ed paper made from 100% recycled pulp by an Imprim’Vert-labelled professional. Partner of the Global Compact Design-production-editing: / Publication May 2019. TRANSDEV 10 Our people at the heart of Transdev’s value proposition 14 Meeting the expectations of our clients and passengers 28 Responsibility means being a local economic and social actor 32 Personalized 34 Autonomous 36 Connected 38 Electric 40 & Eco-friendly The mobility company The mobility TRANSDEV 2 Transdev ID* As an operator and global integrator of mobility, Transdev gives people the freedom to move whenever and however they choose.
  • Innovative Technologies for Light Rail and Tram: a European Reference Resource

    Innovative Technologies for Light Rail and Tram: a European Reference Resource

    Innovative Technologies for Light Rail and Tram: A European reference resource Briefing Paper 4 Traction Battery - NiMH and PRIMOVE Systems September 2015 Sustainable transport for North-West Europe’s periphery Sintropher is a five-year €23m transnational cooperation project with the aim of enhancing local and regional transport provision to, from and withing five peripheral regions in North-West Europe. INTERREG IVB INTERREG IVB North-West Europe is a financial instrument of the European Union’s Cohesion Policy. It funds projects which support transnational cooperation. Innovative technologies for light rail and tram Working in association with the POLIS European transport network, who are kindly hosting these briefing papers on their website. Report produced by University College London Lead Partner of Sintropher project Authors: Charles King, Giacomo Vecia, Imogen Thompson, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London. The paper reflects the views of the authors and should not be taken to be the formal view of UCL or Sintropher project. 4 Innovative technologies for light rail and tram Table of Contents Background .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Innovative technologies for light rail and tram – developing opportunities ................................................... 6 Traction Battery Trams ................................................................................................................................
  • Finest Link New Technologies Challenge

    Finest Link New Technologies Challenge

    FinEst Link New Technologies Challenge Antero Alku, Esa Nurkka Alkutieto Oy, 8.1.2018, päivitetty versio Table of contents 1. Executive summary 2. Goal 3. Service concept of the tunnel • Traffic system level • Service level 4. Variations of a TSI compatible tunnel • Car transport in large profile rolling stock • Dual gauge track 5. Service concepts of trains • Commuter trains • Road vehicle trains • Long distance passenger trains • Night trains to Rail Baltica • Freight trains 6. Traffic economy • Basics of public transport economy • Train operating costs • Tunnel maintenance and operation • Incomes • Operational result 7. Tunnel economy • Return of investment • Development of ROI • ROI and the size of investment 8. Tunnel concept • Basic situation • Helsinki end transfer • Tallinn end transfer • Road vehicle train terminals • Freight transfer terminals • Tunnel track gauge • Tunnel concept investment 9. Tunnel concept • Car transport in large profile rolling stock • Double track gauge 10. Regional impacts • Channel tunnel – a bad proxy for Helsinki-Tallinn tunnel • Øresund Bridge – a better proxy for Helsinki-Tallinn tunnel • Conclusion on the regional impacts 11. Conclusion 2 Executive summary The key findings in this report: ● The justification for the construction of the tunnel is based on the daily commuting between Helsinki area and Tallinn area. The business potential of long term passenger transportation as well as freight transportation is of minor significance, and the business case is viable based solely on commuting traffic. ● The utilization of the artificial islands has not been discussed in this report, but the potential should not be underestimated. ● A 1435/1524 mm dual gauge track is the recommended solution, with 1435 mm tracks dedicated for Rail Baltica passenger trains ending underneath the Helsinki railway station.
  • 2018 Streetcar Summit Westin New Orleans – Canal Place All Sessions in the Grand Ballroom

    2018 Streetcar Summit Westin New Orleans – Canal Place All Sessions in the Grand Ballroom

    2018 Streetcar Summit Westin New Orleans – Canal Place All Sessions in the Grand Ballroom Sunday, April 15, 2018 4:00 – 5:00 pm The Next Generation: Conversations between students from local universities and experts in the field 5:00 – 7:00 pm Reception at the Hotel Monday, April 16, 2018 8:00 – 9:00 am Registration, Check in and Breakfast 9:00 – 10:00 am Welcome and brief updates on projects DJ Baxter, SOJ, Chair Community Streetcar Coalition Board 10:00 – 10:30 am Legislative Update Jeff Boothe, Executive Director, Community Streetcar Coalition 10:30 – 10:45 am Break 10:45 – 12:00 pm Evolving Technology – Off-Wire Vehicles and Autonomous Streetcars Moderator: Barbara Schroeder, Alstom Transport Curtis Ailes, City of Seattle Jim Barbaresso, HNTB Mark Dorn, AECOM 12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch 1:30 – 3:00 pm Evolving Role of Streetcars in Urban Transit Systems Moderator: Ethan Melone, Parsons Robin Aredondo-Savage, Vice Mayor, City of Tempe, AZ Jeff Boothe, Boothe Transit Consulting Tom Gerend, Kansas City Streetcar Authority Keith Jones, RATP Dev America, Washington DC Streetcar Luis Mota, Valley Metro 3:00 – 4:15 pm Planning for the next 10-100 years: Stories from the Veterans Moderator: Jeff Boothe, Community Streetcar Coalition Dan Bower, Executive Director, Portland Streetcar, Inc. Chris Eilerman, City of Seattle Adelee Le Grand, Transdev, New Orleans 4:15 – 4:45 pm Statistics Tracked – what do we choose and why? DJ Baxter, SOJ, Chair Community Streetcar Coalition Board 4:45 – 5:15 pm Opening 2018! – Special look at the new systems opening
  • Refonte Du Reseau De Surface Atoubus Elements D’Analyse Lyon En Lignes.Org

    Refonte Du Reseau De Surface Atoubus Elements D’Analyse Lyon En Lignes.Org

    REFONTE DU RESEAU DE SURFACE ATOUBUS ELEMENTS D’ANALYSE LYON EN LIGNES.ORG Le SYTRAL a souhaité engager une démarche de refonte importante du réseau d’autobus et de trolleybus dans le but d’une meilleure adéquation de l’offre à l’évolution de la mobilité dans l’agglomération lyonnaise et dans un souci de meilleure lisibilité et de meilleure qualité du service de transport. La présente analyse détaille les remarques effectuées par les membres du site www.lyon- en-lignes.org selon une lecture détaillée et comparée à la situation de terrain rencontrée quotidiennement sur le réseau. Dans un second temps, le présent document propose des solutions alternatives à étudier en comparaison au schéma de référence proposé par le SYTRAL. APPROCHE GENERALE La restructuration : un principe souhaitable Le réseau de surface a connu en trois décennies quatre grandes restructurations : la plus importante date de 1978 lors de la mise en service de la première phase du métro ; la deuxième en 1991 lors de la mise en service de la ligne D ; la troisième en 1997 lors de son prolongement à la gare de Vaise ; et enfin en 2001 lors de la mise en service des lignes T1 et T2 du tramway. En complément, des opérations plus ponctuelles ont concerné le plateau ouest en 1980, la Croix-Rousse en 1984, le sud-est lyonnais en 1993 (prolongement de la ligne D à Vénissieux), en 2006 (mise en service de T3) et en 2009 (ouverture de T4). Atoubus est un projet d’ampleur considérable, le plus important depuis 1978. Il est nécessaire compte tenu de l’évolution importante de l’urbanisation et de la dynamique socio-démographique de l’agglomération.
  • Format Acrobat

    Format Acrobat

    N° 88 SÉNAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 1996-1997 Annexe tu procès-verbal de la séance du 21 novembre 1996. AVIS PRÉSENTÉ au nom de la commission des Affaires économiques et du Plan (1) sur le projet de loi de finances pour 1997, ADOPTÉ PAR L'ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE, TOME XVIII TRANSPORTS TERRESTRES Par M. Georges BERCHET, Sénateur. (1) Cette commission est composée de : MM. Jean François-Poncet, président ; Gérard Larcher, Henri Revol, Jean Huchon, Fernand Tardy, Gérard César, Louis Minetti, vice-présidents ; Georges Berchet, William Chervy, Jean-Paul Émin, Louis Moinard, secrétaires ; Louis Althapé, Alphonse Arzel, Mme Janine Bardou, MM. Bernard Barraux, Michel Bécot, Jean Besson, Claude Billard, Marcel Bony, Jean Boyer, Jacques Braconnier, Gérard Braun. Dominique Braye, Michel Charzat, Marcel-Pierre Cleach, Roland Courteau, Désiré Debavelaere, Gérard Delfau, Fernand Demilly, Marcel Deneux, Rodolphe Désiré, Jacques Dominati, Michel Doublet. Mme Josette Durrieu, MM. Bernard Dussaut, Jean-Paul Émorine, Léon Fatous, Hilaire Flandre, Philippe François, Aubert Garcia, François Gerbaud, Charles Ginésy, Jean Grandon, Francis Grignon, Georges Gruillot, Claude Haut, Mme Anne Heinis, MM. Pierre Hérisson, Rémi Herment, Bernard Hugo, Bernard Joly, Edmond Lauret, Jean-François Le Grand, Félix Leyzour, Kléber Malécot, Jacques de Menou, Louis Mercier, Mme Lucette Michaux-Chevry, MM. Jean-Marc Pastor, Jean Pépin, Daniel Percheron, Jean Peyrafitte, Alain Pluchet, Jean Pourchet, Jean Puech, Paul Raoult, Jean-Marie Rausch, Charles Revet, Roger Rigaudière, Roger Rinchet, Jean-Jacques Robert, Jacques Rocca Serra, Josselin de Rohan, René Rouquet, Raymond Soucaret, Michel Souplet, André Vallet, Jean-Pierre Vial. Voir les numéros : Assemblée nationale (l0ème législ.) : 2993. 3030 à 3035 et TA. 590. Sénat: 85 et 86 (annexe n° 18) (1996-1997).
  • Floating Slab Mats 2020

    Floating Slab Mats 2020

    PRODUCT REFERENCE LIST Floating Slab Mats 2020 Year Network Project Product Type Type Track Load Total 2002 FR TBM Bordeaux: Tramway - Tramway 100 kN 31,000 m² Bordeaux 2002 PT Metro Lisbon: Odivelas, - Metro 100 kN 10,000 m² Lisboa Campo Grande & Falagueira station 2003 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Chaussée de - Tramway 100 kN 1,800 m² Charleroi - Phase 1 2003 Brussels: Chaussée de - Tramway 100 kN 5,250 m² Charleroi - Phase 2 2003 De Lijn Gent: Gent St-Pieters - - Tramway 100 kN 10,000 m² Flanders Expo 2003 FR TBM Bordeaux: Tramway - Tramway 130 kN 9,700 m² Bordeaux 2003 GR TRAM SA Athens: Kasamouli - - Tramway 100 kN 4,000 m² Panagitsas 2004 BE De Lijn Gent: Gent St-Pieters - - Tramway 95 kN 400 m² Flanders Expo 2004 ES GTP-FGV Valencia: Tram Valencia - Tramway 113 kN 200 m² 2005 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Avenue de - Tramway 100 kN 2,245 m² l'Hippodrome 2005 Brussels: Rue du Bailli - Tramway 100 kN 2,410 m² 2005 Brussels: Avenue - Tramway 100 kN 610 m² P.Janson 2005 Brussels: L94 - - Tramway 120 kN 600 m² Boulevard du Souverain 2005 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 250 m² 2005 Brussels: Terminus - Tramway 100 kN 550 m² Boondael 2005 PT Metro Porto Porto: Metro do Porto - Tramway 100 kN 3,900 m² 2006 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Terminus - Tramway 130 kN 481 m² Louise Legrand 2006 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 300 m² Fase 2 2006 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 290 m² Fase 2E 2006 Brussels: Wielemans - - Tramway 100 kN 15 m² Van Volxem 2006 ES GTP-FGV Alicante: Tram Line 2 PANDROL FSM- Tramway 113 kN 690 m² L10 2020 © Pandrol 2020